797:
can agree, the breadth of the discipline bio and neuro is substaintially different. 'bio' nowadays is so vast that one can even sell it as a trademark or buy it at a european supermarket,...in a mocking sense what i am getting at is neurology sure is gigantic but still a subset of biology. In the end there's enough research available to warrant those fields dozens of pages, but i don't have the inclination to engage in a wikipedia-writing-binge. Thus for now logic would command to have a page for bio-cyb. with some category of neuro-cyb in it. In fact those interested in how drastically things are going ahead should check out the blue gene and other related projects.
832:
can easily deduce the meaning. I know it's gotten fuzzy over the time, but if each and everyone contributes more and more fuzziness we can skip terminiology and start describing science in everyday-language as warm, bright, kaboo, or..... u get the meaning. Scientific disciplines use terminology for their own name. And we invented terminology for the singular purpose to not end up with some fuzzy lingustics no-one except the author can interprete right, and even that possibility, declining over time. We devised that even one step further further with abstract languages. That's all i can say to that subject.
170:
261:
240:
160:
142:
22:
74:
53:
1189:
one distinct reason. As of 2006 there is no way of creating a Brain interface in any way other than accounting for large sections of the brain . Moreover we don't even know what is going on in there as far as that from complex structure suddenly consciousness arises. An interface should translate something, however a BCI so far is mostly about assuming something.
1093:
university: Biology, Neurobiology, Physics, Applied Math, Cybernetics, Mechanical engineering, Electrical
Engineering, Biomedical Engineering. It mostly comes down to what the conventions are at your university, country, etc. As it happens, I do not know of anyone claiming to do neurocybernetics within the US-- I've only seen the term used in Japan and Europe. --
675:
654:
685:
776:"Neuro cybernetics" is simply the European name for "Neural engineering." I propose we merge the two and ensure that the lead sentence mentions both the European and American names. I would put a redirect too on "Neuro cybernetics" and "Neurocybernetics" pointing towards "Neural engineering". Any objections? --
1188:
Exactly, that's what it is. it is control theory applied to biological systems with special regard to neurology, as one could also apply control theory to a unicellular organism obviously lacking neurons. It should not be merged with BCIs as those are a sub section and in fact don't really match for
831:
Also i am kinda bewildered and stunned at the same time: 'bewildstunned' Does no-one care to check up upon the definitions anymore. I mean no one of you were to mix apples and pears. So if one were to check up on the definitions on neuro; cybernetics; neural; engineering; computational; science one
796:
I created this article a while back ago, but foremost with the propensity to build up and gather information regarding bio cybernetics. - i merged those some months ago. My intend, reading this discussion now would be to rename it to biological cybernetics. Of course it isn't the same as, i hope we
812:
Thanks for your response Dr
Hofmann. Well, I can say this to defend my original idea of combining the two: As far as I know there are no Neurocybernetic departments in North America -- this suggests to me that there is some naming issue at state here that needs to be resolved in some fashion. I
1135:
still u can't just mix them like u wish: abviously neuro cybernetics with or with a blank is the same but computational neur. et al, .....i mean just deduce the meaning of those sub-disciplines by their name, which are too crystal clear to explain them. neuro cybernetics surely will rely on comp.
1207:
Above discussion seems to converge on the decision NOT to merge neuroengineering to neurocybernetics. I apologize for having taken a seemingly one-sided stand for "engineering = building".... My own research is indeed more oriented to hardware, microtechnologies and signal processing. But I am
1040:
but apparently Bocaj was faster. However the only REASON WHY neuro cybernetics today resembles computational neuroscience is because ultimately any theoretical modelling is nowadays carried out on computers - they are a fixture of our lives in any given aspect. Meanwhile some weeks ago, i did
1092:
I have to respectfully disagree with Uli
Hoffman-- engineering is about more than just "building things." It can be about , for example, modeling systems with quantitative methods. The reality is that someone who is doing research in this field could be in any of a number of departments at a
903:
Do you think there is a clear mapping of neurocybernetics with either of these two disciplines? If no we need to clearly state its relationship to both disciplines in its introduction and somewhere in the article we need to justify why it doesn't exist as a discipline in North
America.
786:
I disagree. It's by far not a a question of
European and American names... It is a question of hardware and software. "Neuro cybernetics" is more oriented towards the software, algorithimic and information processing side of the problem "neural interface" - "how to describe and
1178:
I do not know how
Semiconscious' thread developed (after all it is a thread outside our current discussion), but isn't cybernetics part of control theory? So, by far not limited to "interfaces"? I think its not really relevant for this discussion.
919:
I should also mention that "neuro-" is a prefix and not an indepedent word (the independent form is "neural".) Thus if we were to keep "neuro cybernetics" I would recommend that it be renamed to either "neural cybernetics" or "neurocybernetics."
1136:
neurosiences as in fact our civilization seems to rely more on more on computational tasks. We based science on logic long before computers were invented and ult. computers have been implemented the basic logic-set to formulate anything else.
1049:. It is unwise to merge it with comp. neurosc. however as this page will grow rapidly due it's broad range. Ultimately neuro cyb. is a mathematical modelling of 'process pathways' within organism (and come to think of it, dead ones too).
874:. .... The authors present three principles of neural engineering based on the representation of signals by neural ensembles, transformations of these representations through neuronal coupling weights, and the integration of
409:
963:
Even if we all did agree with the hardware and software distinction (which I personally do not), then surely neural engineering should not be merged with a "software" field like computational neuroscience!
937:
I think that Dr. Hoffman makes a good point about the distinction between hardware and software aspects, but I think that the current state of the naming issue does require a choice be made. A merger with
850:, describes itself this way "In Neural Engineering, Chris Eliasmith and Charles Anderson provide a synthesis of the disparate approaches current in computational neuroscience, incorporating ideas from
878:
and neural dynamics." (emphasis added by me.) On BmeCentral, Neural
Engineering is described this way "Neural engineering is an interdisciplinary field comprised of neuroscience, neurobiology and
790:"Neural engineering" is clearly an engineering discipline. It deals with the technological implications - the "how to make". So I think they should be kept as two separate streams. uli hofmann,
900:
Computational
Neuroscience has been around for years now. This field, at least in North America, combines theoretical neuroscience with computer science and cybernetic principles.
703:
1161:
Computational neuroscience is more of a general descriptor of a branch of science that uses computational and mathematical methods for examine the processes of the brain, whereas
707:
419:
314:
1276:
216:
124:
1291:
304:
222:
1266:
114:
560:
747:
484:
1286:
350:
1261:
590:
847:
Many of the books that I've read on "Neural engineering" discuss the theoretical modelling aspects as well. For example, the book "Neural
Engineering"
90:
1301:
1281:
1271:
737:
414:
373:
192:
1306:
1296:
712:
478:
458:
337:
280:
271:
245:
81:
58:
1239:
360:
183:
147:
553:
472:
355:
698:
659:
386:
1209:
497:
364:
33:
1238:
There seem to be quite a few references to "Dr. LaPlaca's lab" in this article, even though it is not an article about that.
882:, encompassing experimental, computational and theoretical aspects of neural tissue regeneration, neural signal processing,
501:
391:
1212:
848:
369:
378:
1151:(I just noticed that Semiconscious made this statement on the computational neuroscience talk page a while back. --
1037:
1010:
1002:
939:
822:
382:
507:
Add
Transhumanism navigation template on the bottom of all transhumanism articles; (use {{Transhumanism}} or see
1243:
1166:
279:
related articles on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the
39:
21:
522:
508:
1170:
191:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
89:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
395:
1214:
1180:
1165:
is more specifically about designing interfaces. I believe neurocybernetics should be combined with
1152:
1126:
990:
921:
905:
777:
1190:
1137:
1050:
998:
833:
818:
798:
770:
620:
175:
1094:
1070:
1014:
965:
943:
1162:
1006:
994:
895:
814:
766:
545:, as this is common with positions on theories on life and may be suitable for deletion (see
535:
462:
1224:
690:
546:
1208:
performing simulations as well. I recommend "Neuroprosthetics - Theory and Practice"
1046:
514:
Add Transhumanism info box to all transhumanism related talk pages (use {{Wpa}} or see
169:
1255:
626:
608:
276:
1223:
I will remove the merge tag, per the above vote and put "other uses" tags instead.--
604:
515:
86:
260:
239:
521:
Add ] to the bottom of all transhumanism related articles, so it shows up on the
469:
Show off a userbox with {{userWPA}} or {{userWPA2}} and attract potential members
1042:
791:
188:
159:
141:
680:
165:
552:
Watch the list of transhumanism related articles and add to accordingly (see
1247:
1227:
1217:
1193:
1183:
1155:
1140:
1129:
1097:
1073:
1053:
1017:
993:"I now think there are two main choices (if we are to make a merge), either
968:
946:
924:
908:
836:
801:
780:
542:
336:
If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the
813:
now think there are two main choices (if we are to make a merge), either
73:
52:
674:
653:
496:
Use a "standard" layout for transhumanism related articles (see:
710:. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at
15:
702:, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the
1041:
however clean the article up and linked it accordingly in
541:
Try to expand stubs, however, some "new" articles may be
534:
Find/cite sources for all positions of an article (see
449:
445:
441:
437:
1118:"computational neuroscience" - 482,000 hits via Google
275:, which aims to organize, expand, clean up, and guide
1069:
Ok. That merge sounds much more reasonable to me. --
436:
187:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
85:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
431:
221:This article has not yet received a rating on the
989:I was refering to the specific statement made by
1121:"neural engineering" - 2,350,000 hits via Google
326:For more information and how you can help click
706:and that biomedical information in any article
1105:Some possibly helpful contextual statistics:
886:, neuroelectronics, neuromechanical systems,
704:Manual of Style for medicine-related articles
8:
892:neural circuits (artificial and biological)
19:
1115:"neural cybernetics" - 224 hits via Google
1112:"neurocybernetics" - 9,290 hits via Google
648:
322:
234:
136:
47:
1109:"neuro cybernetics" - 740 hits via Google
713:Knowledge (XXG) talk:WikiProject Medicine
289:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Transhumanism
1036:I wanted to point out the similarity to
99:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Neuroscience
1277:Unknown-importance Engineering articles
890:, neuroimaging, neural prosthetics and
650:
236:
201:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Engineering
138:
49:
1292:High-importance Transhumanism articles
567:
455:
1267:High-importance neuroscience articles
7:
722:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Medicine
696:This article is within the scope of
181:This article is within the scope of
79:This article is within the scope of
38:It is of interest to the following
1287:Start-Class Transhumanism articles
365:Knowledge (XXG):Research resources
361:Links to Transhumanism information
292:Template:WikiProject Transhumanism
14:
1262:Start-Class neuroscience articles
942:seems the best course of action.
102:Template:WikiProject Neuroscience
1302:Mid-importance medicine articles
1282:WikiProject Engineering articles
1272:Start-Class Engineering articles
708:use high-quality medical sources
683:
673:
652:
259:
238:
204:Template:WikiProject Engineering
168:
158:
140:
72:
51:
20:
884:neural modeling and computation
742:This article has been rated as
309:This article has been rated as
119:This article has been rated as
1307:All WikiProject Medicine pages
1211:over the "Neural Engineering"
575:Notable transhumanist articles
523:list of transhumanism articles
459:Join WikiProject transhumanism
1:
1297:Start-Class medicine articles
781:03:38, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
725:Template:WikiProject Medicine
428:
195:and see a list of open tasks.
93:and see a list of open tasks.
1228:18:35, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
580:Shorten / merge into others
1323:
1218:14:44, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
1184:14:36, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
1141:18:14, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
1038:computational neuroscience
1011:computational neuroscience
1003:computational neuroscience
940:computational neuroscience
894:." (empahsis added by me)
837:18:21, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
823:computational neuroscience
802:18:21, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
748:project's importance scale
611:- discuss whether you are
420:New Transhumanism articles
315:project's importance scale
223:project's importance scale
125:project's importance scale
1194:17:43, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
1173:19:22, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
1156:18:54, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
1130:03:48, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
1098:01:11, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
1074:14:12, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
1054:17:55, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
1018:02:47, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
969:01:11, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
947:00:30, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
925:18:59, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
909:17:12, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
741:
668:
561:write for an encyclopedia
321:
308:
272:WikiProject Transhumanism
254:
220:
153:
118:
67:
46:
1248:19:05, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
1167:Brain-computer interface
598:Your immediate attention
82:WikiProject Neuroscience
184:WikiProject Engineering
625:Clarify references in
554:transhumanism articles
370:Writing about religion
295:Transhumanism articles
28:This article is rated
860:communications theory
415:Transhumanism article
105:neuroscience articles
32:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
1009:is another name for
1005:." I am saying that
1001:or another name for
997:is another name for
821:or another name for
817:is another name for
699:WikiProject Medicine
591:a transhumanism stub
207:Engineering articles
509:navigation template
498:The perfect article
473:Help with articles.
374:Article development
340:for more details.
267:Neural engineering'
999:neural engineering
872:probability theory
856:neural computation
819:neural engineering
771:Neural engineering
629:, using footnotes.
483:Help out with the
176:Engineering portal
34:content assessment
1163:neuro cybernetics
1007:neuro cybernetics
995:neuro cybernetics
815:neuro cybernetics
767:Neuro cybernetics
762:
761:
758:
757:
754:
753:
728:medicine articles
647:
646:
643:
642:
639:
638:
635:
634:
529:Maintenance / Etc
502:Featured articles
479:adopt an article.
477:See this month's
392:Assume good faith
387:Original research
383:Verifying sources
283:for more details.
233:
232:
229:
228:
135:
134:
131:
130:
1314:
888:neuroinformatics
880:computer science
765:Merge proposal:
730:
729:
726:
723:
720:
693:
688:
687:
686:
677:
670:
669:
664:
656:
649:
547:deletion process
429:
323:
297:
296:
293:
290:
287:
263:
256:
255:
250:
242:
235:
209:
208:
205:
202:
199:
178:
173:
172:
162:
155:
154:
144:
137:
107:
106:
103:
100:
97:
76:
69:
68:
63:
55:
48:
31:
25:
24:
16:
1322:
1321:
1317:
1316:
1315:
1313:
1312:
1311:
1252:
1251:
1236:
1234:Self-promotion?
1022:NO IT IS NOT!!!
774:
727:
724:
721:
718:
717:
691:Medicine portal
689:
684:
682:
662:
426:
404:See changes to:
311:High-importance
294:
291:
288:
285:
284:
249:High‑importance
248:
206:
203:
200:
197:
196:
174:
167:
121:High-importance
104:
101:
98:
95:
94:
62:High‑importance
61:
29:
12:
11:
5:
1320:
1318:
1310:
1309:
1304:
1299:
1294:
1289:
1284:
1279:
1274:
1269:
1264:
1254:
1253:
1240:98.150.246.224
1235:
1232:
1231:
1230:
1205:
1204:
1203:
1202:
1201:
1200:
1199:
1198:
1197:
1196:
1159:
1145:
1134:
1123:
1122:
1119:
1116:
1113:
1110:
1103:
1102:
1101:
1100:
1087:
1086:
1085:
1084:
1083:
1082:
1081:
1080:
1079:
1078:
1077:
1076:
1047:biocybernetics
1034:
1033:
1032:
1031:
1030:
1029:
1028:
1027:
1026:
1025:
1024:
1023:
978:
977:
976:
975:
974:
973:
972:
971:
954:
953:
952:
951:
950:
949:
930:
929:
928:
927:
914:
913:
912:
911:
901:
898:
876:control theory
864:control theory
858:, physiology,
841:
829:
828:
827:
826:
806:
794:
793:
788:
773:
763:
760:
759:
756:
755:
752:
751:
744:Mid-importance
740:
734:
733:
731:
695:
694:
678:
666:
665:
663:Mid‑importance
657:
645:
644:
641:
640:
637:
636:
633:
632:
631:
630:
623:
594:
593:
577:
576:
566:
565:
564:
557:
550:
539:
536:citing sources
526:
525:
519:
512:
505:
488:
487:
481:
475:
470:
453:
452:
435:
427:
425:
424:
423:
422:
417:
412:
405:
401:
400:
399:
398:
389:
379:Citing sources
376:
367:
358:
356:Article layout
353:
351:Main talk page
346:
342:
332:
331:
319:
318:
307:
301:
300:
298:
264:
252:
251:
243:
231:
230:
227:
226:
219:
213:
212:
210:
193:the discussion
180:
179:
163:
151:
150:
145:
133:
132:
129:
128:
117:
111:
110:
108:
91:the discussion
77:
65:
64:
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1319:
1308:
1305:
1303:
1300:
1298:
1295:
1293:
1290:
1288:
1285:
1283:
1280:
1278:
1275:
1273:
1270:
1268:
1265:
1263:
1260:
1259:
1257:
1250:
1249:
1245:
1241:
1233:
1229:
1226:
1222:
1221:
1220:
1219:
1216:
1213:
1210:
1195:
1192:
1187:
1186:
1185:
1182:
1177:
1176:
1175:
1174:
1172:
1171:Semiconscious
1168:
1164:
1160:
1157:
1154:
1150:
1149:
1148:
1147:
1146:
1143:
1142:
1139:
1132:
1131:
1128:
1120:
1117:
1114:
1111:
1108:
1107:
1106:
1099:
1096:
1091:
1090:
1089:
1088:
1075:
1072:
1068:
1067:
1066:
1065:
1064:
1063:
1062:
1061:
1060:
1059:
1058:
1057:
1056:
1055:
1052:
1048:
1044:
1039:
1021:
1020:
1019:
1016:
1012:
1008:
1004:
1000:
996:
992:
988:
987:
986:
985:
984:
983:
982:
981:
980:
979:
970:
967:
962:
961:
960:
959:
958:
957:
956:
955:
948:
945:
941:
936:
935:
934:
933:
932:
931:
926:
923:
918:
917:
916:
915:
910:
907:
902:
899:
896:
893:
889:
885:
881:
877:
873:
869:
865:
861:
857:
853:
852:neural coding
849:
846:
845:
844:
843:
842:
839:
838:
835:
824:
820:
816:
811:
810:
809:
808:
807:
804:
803:
800:
792:
789:
785:
784:
783:
782:
779:
772:
768:
764:
749:
745:
739:
736:
735:
732:
715:
714:
709:
705:
701:
700:
692:
681:
679:
676:
672:
671:
667:
661:
658:
655:
651:
628:
627:Transhumanism
624:
622:
618:
614:
610:
609:false dilemma
606:
603:
602:
601:
600:
599:
592:
589:
588:
587:
586:
582:
581:
574:
573:
572:
571:
562:
558:
555:
551:
548:
544:
540:
537:
533:
532:
531:
530:
524:
520:
517:
513:
510:
506:
503:
499:
495:
494:
493:
492:
491:Be consistent
486:
482:
480:
476:
474:
471:
468:
467:
466:
465:
464:
460:
454:
451:
447:
443:
439:
434:
430:
421:
418:
416:
413:
411:
410:Core articles
408:
407:
406:
403:
402:
397:
393:
390:
388:
384:
380:
377:
375:
371:
368:
366:
362:
359:
357:
354:
352:
349:
348:
347:
344:
343:
341:
339:
334:
333:
329:
325:
324:
320:
316:
312:
306:
303:
302:
299:
286:Transhumanism
282:
278:
277:Transhumanism
274:
273:
268:
265:
262:
258:
257:
253:
247:
246:Transhumanism
244:
241:
237:
224:
218:
215:
214:
211:
194:
190:
186:
185:
177:
171:
166:
164:
161:
157:
156:
152:
149:
146:
143:
139:
126:
122:
116:
113:
112:
109:
92:
88:
84:
83:
78:
75:
71:
70:
66:
60:
57:
54:
50:
45:
41:
35:
27:
23:
18:
17:
1237:
1206:
1144:
1133:
1124:
1104:
1035:
891:
887:
883:
879:
875:
871:
867:
863:
859:
855:
851:
840:
830:
805:
795:
775:
743:
711:
697:
616:
612:
605:false choice
597:
596:
595:
584:
583:
579:
578:
569:
568:
528:
527:
490:
489:
457:
456:
432:
338:project page
335:
327:
310:
281:project page
270:
266:
182:
120:
96:Neuroscience
87:Neuroscience
80:
59:Neuroscience
40:WikiProjects
1225:Sadi Carnot
1169:instead. --
1153:Ben Houston
1127:Ben Houston
1043:cybernetics
991:Ben Houston
922:Ben Houston
906:Ben Houston
778:Ben Houston
619:this merge
559:And always
485:To-do lists
433:To Do List:
345:Quick help:
269:is part of
198:Engineering
189:engineering
148:Engineering
30:Start-class
1256:Categories
543:neologisms
1215:Ughofmann
1181:Ughofmann
868:dynamics
719:Medicine
660:Medicine
516:info box
396:be civil
787:model".
746:on the
617:against
463:be bold
442:history
313:on the
123:on the
1191:Slicky
1138:Slicky
1051:Slicky
870:, and
834:Slicky
799:Slicky
585:Expand
570:Create
500:, and
36:scale.
1095:Joeyo
1071:Joeyo
1015:Bocaj
966:Joeyo
944:Bocaj
769:into
607:into
450:purge
446:watch
1244:talk
1045:and
621:here
461:and
438:edit
394:and
385:and
372:and
363:and
328:Show
305:High
115:High
1013:.--
738:Mid
615:or
613:for
217:???
1258::
1246:)
1125:--
964:--
920:--
904:--
866:,
862:,
854:,
448:-
444:-
440:-
381:,
1242:(
1158:)
897:.
825:.
750:.
716:.
563:.
556:)
549:)
538:.
518:)
511:)
504:)
330::
317:.
225:.
127:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
