Knowledge

Talk:New Jersey Turnpike/GA4

Source 📝

42: 251:
section, and they contain a lot of detail that may be excessive. The "In popular culture" may contain indiscriminate, trivial mentions, and many of the entries are unsourced. If I had seen this nomination sooner, I would have recommended that it be withdrawn, because many of the issues mentioned in GA3 have not been addressed adequately. –
250:
I know this nomination has been failed already, but I do not think the article is broad in coverage, either. There is more that can be said about the turnpike's history between the 1950s and the 1990s. The first six paragraphs of the "2000s to present" section are longer than the "1950s to 1990s"
219:
I'm afraid this is going to be a quickfail. The article is not at all ready for GAN. I see a citation needed tag, an unreliable source tag, a full citation needed tag, and multiple paragraphs with no citations. Please address these issues, and the unresolved issues from
47: 80: 126: 70: 156: 122: 52: 107: 99: 232: 228: 171: 175: 75: 240: 150: 221: 236: 146: 191:
At least one unreliable source tag, and several areas with no citations, plus multiple dead links as citations.
115: 17: 256: 92: 252: 260: 244: 160: 203:
I do not see anything glaring, but have not fully evaluated this criterion.
185:
Several issues with prose, not to mention multiple areas lacking citations.
174:. This is how the article, as of January 10, 2023, compares against the 231:. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to have it 134: 103: 227:
When these issues are addressed, the article can be
8: 215:I have not fully evaluated this criterion. 30: 197:Think we are generally in OK shape here. 61: 33: 7: 235:. Thank you for your work so far.— 24: 166:Failed "good article" nomination 1: 261:01:35, 11 January 2023 (UTC) 245:20:34, 10 January 2023 (UTC) 222:Talk:New Jersey Turnpike/GA3 170:This article has failed its 161:20:34, 10 January 2023 (UTC) 277: 201:4. Neutral point of view?: 176:six good article criteria 18:Talk:New Jersey Turnpike 224:, before renominating. 172:Good article nomination 195:3. Broad in coverage?: 237:Trainsandotherthings 147:Trainsandotherthings 183:1. Well written?: 89: 88: 268: 139: 130: 111: 43:Copyvio detector 31: 276: 275: 271: 270: 269: 267: 266: 265: 189:2. Verifiable?: 168: 120: 97: 91: 85: 57: 29: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 274: 272: 264: 263: 217: 216: 210: 204: 198: 192: 186: 167: 164: 140: 87: 86: 84: 83: 78: 73: 67: 64: 63: 59: 58: 56: 55: 53:External links 50: 45: 39: 36: 35: 28: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 273: 262: 258: 254: 249: 248: 247: 246: 242: 238: 234: 230: 225: 223: 214: 211: 208: 205: 202: 199: 196: 193: 190: 187: 184: 181: 180: 179: 177: 173: 165: 163: 162: 158: 155: 152: 148: 145: 141: 138: 137: 133: 128: 124: 119: 118: 114: 109: 105: 101: 96: 95: 82: 79: 77: 74: 72: 69: 68: 66: 65: 60: 54: 51: 49: 46: 44: 41: 40: 38: 37: 32: 26: 19: 226: 218: 212: 206: 200: 194: 188: 182: 169: 153: 143: 142: 135: 131: 117:Article talk 116: 112: 93: 90: 81:Instructions 229:renominated 213:6. Images?: 207:5. Stable?: 104:visual edit 253:Epicgenius 233:reassessed 209:Okay here. 48:Authorship 34:GA toolbox 144:Reviewer: 71:Templates 62:Reviewing 27:GA Review 157:contribs 76:Criteria 127:history 108:history 94:Article 136:Watch 16:< 257:talk 241:talk 151:talk 123:edit 100:edit 259:) 243:) 178:: 159:) 125:| 106:| 102:| 255:( 239:( 154:· 149:( 132:· 129:) 121:( 113:· 110:) 98:(

Index

Talk:New Jersey Turnpike
Copyvio detector
Authorship
External links
Templates
Criteria
Instructions
Article
edit
visual edit
history
Article talk
edit
history
Watch
Trainsandotherthings
talk
contribs
20:34, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
Good article nomination
six good article criteria
Talk:New Jersey Turnpike/GA3
renominated
reassessed
Trainsandotherthings
talk
20:34, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
Epicgenius
talk
01:35, 11 January 2023 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.