478:
work. I suspect it was never more than a term of derision, used first by German liberals and later by
American Roman Catholics and Protestant fundamentalists, and which now has become part of the common theological vocabulary without having reeived, in English-speaking scholarship, the critical evaluation for which it calls. Moreover, it is an important question whether any one term can describe the widely varied theologies of the Niebuhr brothers (who were very different from each other), Paul Tillich, Karl Barth, Emil Brunner (who were more or less at each others' throats theologically from 1929 until Brunner's death in 1966), and Rudolph Bultmann, who lived in an entirely different theological and hermeneutical universe from the rest.
960:"Crisis theology, or neoorthodoxy, saw the Bible as the ultimate authority but did not consider it inerrant. God, it affirmed, does not reveal doctrines but makes himself known in history through his "mighty acts," chief of which is Jesus Christ. The Holy Spirit enabled the biblical writers to see the acts as a revelation of God's will and can likewise inspire readers. Believers may avoid the fundamentalist error of pitting the biblical story of creation against the scientific theory of evolution by recognizing that the Bible does not attempt to give a scientific explanation of how the universe began; it reveals God's will and purpose in creation."
990:. Also a reaction against rationalism and science, existentialism, according to Kierkegaard, insists that religious truth is discovered not by abstract thought or scientific observation but by living. God cannot be an object of human thought; he is a living person who challenges us to decision. Christianity, said Kierkegaard, is the courage to be an individual over against the masses, whose minds have been subjected to mass media. Existentialism does not ask "What is Christianity?" and expect an answer in terms of doctrine. It asks, "How does one become a Christian?", which must be answered by individual decision."
957:"Liberal theology was challenged on another level by the new, postwar Crisis theology, developed in Europe by the Swiss pastor Karl Barth. Trained as a liberal but disillusioned by the war, he published a commentary on Romans (1919) in which he called for a return to the traditional, orthodox Christian view of sin. This neoorthodoxy, did not, however, return to other aspects of orthodoxy but accepted the results of biblical criticism and scientific thought. Fundamentalists found it even more distasteful than liberalism."
1473:"I don't disagree or dispute this, but would be very interested in seeing this sourced. This is a hunch I've had for a long time. It was less influential among mainline Protestant groups with an Arminian theological orientation, such as the Methodist Church, the Episcopal Church, the Christian Church (Disciples of Christ), and the Northern Baptists, with many pastors in these denominations opting to continue the traditions of American religious liberalism (while others firmly took their stands with evangelicalism)."
160:
184:
84:
53:
253:
263:
232:
196:
954:"Reaction to Liberal Theology. By 1900, Liberal theology and its concomitants--biblical criticism and the theory of evolution--were being challenged in the U.S. by fundamentalists, who believed that these elements were destroying the fundamental truths of Chrsitanity and dedicated themselves to rooting them out. As a reslut, several deonminations split, and new ones, many of them Pentecostal, formed."
22:
94:
1207:, and the construction of a theology firmly based on the proclamation of God's word in the bible. But despite this emphasis on God's otherness, and stern warnings not to confuse God's realm with the human (dalectical theology), even neo-orthodox theologians are rooted in a particular cultural context. Two world wars, the terror imposed by totalitarian regimes, a technologically organized
951:"20th Century. Protestanitism entered the 20th century with great optimism inspired by the achievements of liberal theology and missionary success. Its confidence was severely jolted, however, by World War I, which proved that Christendom had not progressed beyond barbarism after all, and by theological controversy. But it moved toward greater social involvement and religious unity."
1219:, and technology have led to a deep mistrust of all human institutions and culture. God's transcendence must be safeguarded and human brokenness affirmed. Humanity's only hope is God's saving action in Christ. This strong Christocentrism confonts individuals with the need for a radical decision for or against God's word in Jesus Christ as proclaimed by the church." --
539:
Brunner, and perhaps others, from readings of whose work they actually derive. In this article, perhaps it would be best to use this section to describe the things scholars like Tracy and
Douglas John Hall say hold allegedly "neo-orthodox" theologians together, such as a mostly negative assessment of human nature and society.
1541:
occurances; and c.) even if something is a revelation it may not be from God; any other spiritual force going around making revelations has every reason to try to convince people that he/it is God when something different, or opposite, may be the case. Books which tell us about God also tell us about, e.g. The Devil...
938:(1919), introducing a "theology of crisis," which, in rejection of Liberalism, reaffirmed Pauline, Augustinian, and Reformation doctrines of the divine initiative and the Bible as God's Word. In America, Reinhold Niebuhr similarly returned from Liberalism to Biblical and early Protestant points of emphasis."
1540:
What we actually have, the reports, is three steps away from God, since a.) they are only human reports; b.) the people making the reports, no matter how sincere, well-motivated, intelligent and observant they may be, may still be mistaken; they may be delusions, or honest attempts to explain unusual
1374:
Well, if you feel that way I am sure you can find a way to sort it out. I hope nobody feels reluctant to offer sources. Now, the EA says that one brother was "second to none in social concern", NOT in introducing to
America, but certainly that the introduction was due to him. The Oxford confirms both
729:
Again, let me quote "not least the fundamental one that there ever was any such 'movement' as neo-orthodoxy." For someone who claims to be a seminary professor on their user page, it seems virtually impossible for this to be true when even a collegiate dictionary states that neo-orthodoxy was in fact
680:
Please discuss your changes. Add something about
Barbour if you like. He was a decent scholar, a specialist in science & religion, but belonged to a previous generation. Moreover, I have not disputed the obvious fact that people use the term neo-orthodoxy. I am only pointing out that contemporary
477:
I believe documentation is needed for many claims in this article, not least the fundamental one that there ever was any such "movement" as neo-orthodoxy. It would help immensely if someone could document that a theologian associated with the term ever accepted it as a valid description of his or her
1339:
Regarding 3rd-Opinion dispute. As I've learned at the library, the other most recent editor does indeed employ some good up-to-date sources, but his or her lede seemed out-of-line with other summaries, while the original (not written by me) was pretty much inline with them. If my actions or comments
538:
I seem to be talking to myself here, but against the possibility that someone else gets interested in this article, I will continue to do so. I believe it would be valuable to change the section on theological emphases. Much of what is there might more appropriately be part of the articles on Barth,
1585:
I don't want to affront you, but I did a little
Googling of Thurneysen and wonder if someone might have questioned whether he met the test of notability. I would think Knowledge (XXG) would have an archive of deleted pages, so that the talk page could be reviewed, but if it does, I don't know where
845:
This is because "some theologians" looks like "weasel words", given the rather subjective evaluation the sentence represents, unless the ENTIRE statement can be attributed to some reliable source. Preferably that source should be attributed inline. Please add HERE verifiable and sourced statements
714:
I do not doubt that
Barbour uses the term. I am on vacation and cannot consult my copy of his book. I have cited several scholars who likewise use the term in often-contradictory ways. Please feel free to write about how Barbour uses the term. However, his use of the term does not contradict what I
492:
I have checked sources that use the term neo-orthodoxy for some of the individuals listed in the "Important
Figures" section, and can find no published source that associates Stringfellow, Lehmann, or Ellul with this term. I am tagging them as citation needed, and will delete them if no citation is
1378:
It is so easy to word it according to the sources, which make it clear that both brothers were notable in this regard. Please do not refer to sources that you cannot produce or move the discussion to other matters; that defeats the object of the exercise. If there are sources that offer views that
1298:
The material does not give prominence to the other brother as the introducer to
America but only as a prominent theologian. The version above contains all relevant material you have offered. One cannot attribute to these two sources statements that they do not make. The statement that the two were
1517:
I would like this question to be sent to an
Orthodox theologian. I believe one critical point of clarification relates to the word "forensic". If you follow the link to the Knowledge (XXG) article you will only find it used as in crime scene investigations. In my limited understanding of Orthodox
1042:
page xxxiii has this statement: "Tillich's career was begun when liberal theology was on the wane; he lived through the transitions of theology from the rise of 'crisis' theology to is transformation by Barth into neo-orthodoxy, and from the decline of Barth's influence to the paramountcy of
619:
What has been written by you not only ignores the original scholarship (which was not only accurate to the expert but plausible and uncontroversial to the general reader) but nearly obliterates it. If such sources exist to support what you wrote (which is highly suspect), then these sources
1084:
Neo-orthodoxy along with
Fundamentalism is described as "anti-cultural moves, dictated by a fortress mentality. "They are defensive forms of Christian living in a complex world; attempts to remain free of or withdraw from the various cultural pressures that are thought to compromise their
1375:
brothers were important. But you cannot claim absolute preeminence for both, much less attribute this judgment to "theologians" without attribution, on the basis of these sources. Is this such an important thing, that you would hold us up just to assert something that cannot be verified?
1194:
are often grouped under the title 'neo-orthodox' to highlight their common interest in constructing a theology grounded on Reformation principles. At the time they often described it as a 'dialectical theology'. Its major characteristics are the critique of 19th- and early 20th-century
963:"Because neoorthodoxy emphasized the doctrine of sin, it was often considered pessimistic. In fact, it firmly believed in the power of God to renew human life. Its position was summed up in Jesus' words "With men this is impossible, but with God all things are possible"
1379:
seem "out of line", please produce those: it would be conscientious to find a way to incorporate that material. Please do not forget to make a concordance with the brothers' own pages and other articles. Please ask the other editors warmly to participate.
604:
I beg your pardon, but my revisions were richly sourced, unlike the original, without a hint of original research. I am reverting this back to the way it was. Please do not revert again without specifically discussing the changes here, as I have done all
523:
I added a section on theologians who have been called neo-orthodox, and some of the problems with that, and moved the existing statement that the term has largely been abandoned into the opening paragraph. I'm now looking for the original source of the
1518:
theology, the word is used to critique Western theology's narrow interpretation of justification, that it, seeing God as a judge who pronounces the accused as guilty, but exonerated by grace. Orthodoxy has a broader definition of salvation as theosis.
1544:
This is a serious matter, since people who think they have revelations from God are not shy in forcing their views on others. Obviously this would be wonderful if they were right -- but there is, um, at least the possibility that they are not.
1241:'s return from Liberalism to Biblical and early Protestant points of emphasis that marked the introduction of neoorthodoxy to America. Niehbur was second to none in his concern to apply Christianity to the social realm: his brother
1117:
Opinion the third here. I understand why the reference was altered. The sentence was right in respect of one brother. The importance of the other has yet to be established. Can a well-sourced statement be found for him?
642:"not least the fundamental one that there ever was any such 'movement' as neo-orthodoxy." This is the basic motivation for the changes made. Let me point out to other editors that the term Neo-orthodoxy is well used by
1634:
There is now an article on Thurneysen, and viewing its history reveals it has been in Knowledge (XXG) since November 2016, so that reveals it has entered Knowledge (XXG) after the above comments were typed.
1402:
Firefly, I note that you have not replied nor contacted other involved editors, but have continued to edit. Would you like me to reword and reinsert the sentence, or suggest a version yourself, or what?
508:
I deleted this section, since no references were ever given after I marked it, and it seems to contradict the section on difficulties identifying theologians to whom the term can meaningfully be applied.
804:
Here's a minor third opinion, not on the substance which I know little about. But given this obviously is a contention version, either version should have inline citations - and with page numbers. See
1537:
The article is full of references to revelations by God when what is actually meant is something quite different, human reports of what some, but not all, people believe to be revelations from God.
419:
I am curious why there is the necessity to distance Barth from the existentialism of say, Paul Tillich, who is also as a liberal theologian. I wonder whether it might be better to distance him from
357:
I've done a bit of editing to make this more readable. I'm not sure about the portion that is in parentheses though, and this might need to be further defined--perhaps through an example).
169:
63:
860:
Further please note that neither Niehbur's own article relates them straightforwardly to neo-orthodoxy. The requested data, if available, should be added there too, preferably first.
1863:
214:
646:
a scholar with a Ph.D. in Physics from the University of Chicago and a B.S. in Divinity from Yale and who has taught at a top 10 liberal arts college for decades and even won the
1868:
1858:
1848:
174:
1620:
Well, that would certainly explain it! I did ask at the Village Pump, and was directed to some off-site resources for deleted pages, but didn't find anything there, either.
1317:. All quotes above have been provided to give understanding of how this topic is handled in other encylopedia sources in general. In particular, the material shows that
696:
Barbour's usage in a textbook simply refutes your comments and your justifications for making changes. Other editors can figure out what's going on. Perhaps listing at
1771:
1767:
1753:
1843:
150:
1853:
761:
1670:
967:
The charge that neoorthodxy had no social or political concerns also was inaccurate. Barth threw himself into the struggle against Hitler and was forced to flee.
1696:
This article says that "Karl Barth is the leading figure associated with the movement"(i.e. neo-orthodoxy) right at the start of the article, but the article on
209:
67:
1838:
140:
335:
289:
1276:
The material supports both brothers in the article, but the sentence taken out probably needs to be recast, rewritten, etc. to reflect known weaknesses. --
1873:
1833:
1132:"I have something along those lines. I need to find an electronic version or quote part of it for you. I should have it up in ten to twenty minutes." --
116:
1424:
for the original editors. I think it can be left out for now, but your rewording and reinsertion would be another way forward. I leave it up to you. --
1883:
325:
297:
1888:
1878:
107:
58:
1739:
1450:? (Or I suspect not). It would possibly be profitable if the article could relate Neo-Orthodoxy to Lutheran Orthodoxy – or unrelate it.
293:
1508:
1480:
372:
809:. I personally feel such inline citations are more credible, whatever the disputed material is. Carol Moore 15:31, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
1749:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
301:
277:
237:
1503:? Were the former's proponents influenced by the latter's theology in any way? Or is the similarity in naming just a coincidence?
1067:
1104:
1063:
1010:
33:
578:
554:
I put the unreferenced section template here, and will edit the section along the lines I mentioned above when time permits.
1814:
201:
1552:
423:
as this is more related to the effect of modernism on Christianity than Liberal Christianity which is more to do with
806:
1504:
1108:
971:, who took neoorthodoxy to America, was second to none in his concern to apply Christianity to the social realm."
1770:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
1025:
658:. Altough I can sympathize with such thinking, such an attitude nevertheless remains fundamentally confused. --
39:
21:
1805:
1731:
1476:
1092:
1051:
998:
397:
360:
1727:
1576:
1548:
1484:
1314:
880:
813:
420:
368:
1789:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
1777:
1740:
https://web.archive.org/web/20090815082957/http://www.lutterworth.com/jamesclarke/jc/titles/karlbart.htm
720:
686:
610:
559:
544:
529:
513:
498:
483:
458:
115:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1730:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
364:
1523:
1519:
1429:
1349:
1330:
1281:
1224:
1137:
1100:
1078:
1059:
1006:
926:"Protestant Neoorthodoxy stood in the same loose relation to Soren Kierkegaard that Modernism did to
795:
769:
747:
705:
663:
629:
594:
414:
1621:
1587:
974:"Many neoorthodox were attracted to existentialism, a philosophy developed by the 19th century Dane
577:
uses the term on pages 5, 116-19, 124, 134, 223, 229-32, 267f, 376-80, 383, 416, 422-25 of his book
1625:
1591:
1408:
1384:
1304:
1250:
1123:
865:
851:
846:
of notable authorities re. the importance of the Niehburs in introducing this theology to America.
99:
1325:
are both noteworthy figures for the article. Earlier editors material may need to be re-worked.--
442:
Hmmm..I could have sworn I saw him listed in Liberal Theologians..oh well..strike that comment. --
1610:
1447:
1318:
1187:
1179:
1170:"Despite their considerable differences and theological contexts, Protestant theologians such as
1074:
839:
807:
Knowledge (XXG):Citing_sources#When_adding_material_that_is_challenged_or_likely_to_be_challenged
1774:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
1743:
1790:
1602:
1572:
1500:
975:
810:
655:
1341:
1705:
1640:
1455:
1322:
1264:
1242:
1238:
1196:
1191:
987:
979:
968:
835:
716:
682:
651:
639:
606:
582:
555:
540:
525:
509:
494:
479:
466:
392:
1797:
1421:
786:
also " of the problem"Â ? The original article is in line with these two sources as well as
1425:
1345:
1326:
1277:
1220:
1133:
1096:
1055:
1002:
791:
779:
765:
757:
743:
735:
731:
701:
673:
659:
647:
625:
590:
268:
831:
Third opinion. I have removed the following statement temporarily and without prejudice;
677:
586:
1756:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
1404:
1380:
1300:
1246:
1119:
927:
861:
847:
1796:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
1763:
697:
585:
is in error and his or her edits done with a lack of sources suggests extreme form of
159:
1827:
1723:
1606:
1313:"second to none in introducing" is a quote from volumen 22 pages 691-692 of the 2002
443:
436:
428:
883:(p.516) there is this entry: neoorthodoxy (Dalectical theology; Theology of crisis)
1183:
1175:
1021:
983:
183:
112:
1340:
were too quick to judge or too crude in judgement, I fear I may have strayed into
1031:
Neo-orthodoxy, xxix-xxxi, 25, 31, 173 is listed as an entry in its index (p.252)
1701:
1636:
1451:
1260:
787:
643:
621:
574:
388:
1089:. Manuel Castells calls them 'resistance communities' (Castells, 1997: 5-67)."
262:
195:
1762:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
1697:
1171:
931:
842:(1894-1962), did more to introduce neo-orthodoxy to America than anyone else.
783:
424:
258:
191:
89:
83:
52:
1208:
252:
231:
93:
288:-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us
1212:
1020:
462:
284:
764:
where we again see that your rewrite is, in comparison, off the wall. --
1216:
1819:
1709:
1644:
1629:
1614:
1595:
1580:
1556:
1527:
1512:
1488:
1463:
1433:
1412:
1388:
1353:
1334:
1308:
1285:
1268:
1254:
1228:
1141:
1127:
1014:
869:
855:
799:
773:
751:
738:
would write something along those lines and possibly provide a tag as
724:
709:
690:
667:
633:
620:
contradict scholars who are so much more respected and reliable, e.g.
614:
598:
563:
548:
533:
517:
502:
487:
427:, although modernism could be considered a subset of Liberal belief --
401:
376:
1086:
1035:
pages xxix-xxxiv have section title "From Orthodoxy to Neo-Orthodoxy"
672:
I am once again going to put back my well documented text, and call
1420:
I always thought the sentence was weak. I only left it because of
581:. Barbour is an A-list theologian. His usage makes it clear that
1533:
More Than Mere Documentation Needed: How About Truth In Labelling?
1204:
715:
have written, but is only an instance of one facet of the problem.
1245:
was also prominent in the construction of neoorthodox theology.
1566:
1200:
15:
1744:
http://www.lutterworth.com/jamesclarke/jc/titles/karlbart.htm
1571:
Why was the English language article on Thurneysen removed?
182:
158:
1734:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
1026:
Perspectives on 19th and 20th century Protestant theology
1073:
1700:
says that Karl Barth rejected the term neo-orthodoxy.
1166:
On Page 468 there is a neo-orthodoxy entry that notes
282:, a project to improve Knowledge (XXG)'s articles on
978:
and rediscovered in the 20th century by such men as
734:. Were it routinely used as a term of "opproprium",
387:
Hope that no one minds the cross reference. Thanks.
111:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
1766:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
1299:"second to none in introducing" is not borne out.
1199:with its failure to distinguish sharply between
879:In the index (volume 30) of the 2002, hard-copy
1237:According to the Encyclopedia Americana it was
1752:This message was posted before February 2018.
1211:together with insights into the amibiquity of
654:'s doubt of the existance of neo-orthodoxy is
1864:Top-importance Reformed Christianity articles
1605:. Perhaps it was under a different spelling.
8:
834:Some theologians believe that two brothers,
1499:Any relationship between neo-orthodoxy and
934:, electrified the theological world by his
624:, that their use is not really sensible. --
19:
1869:WikiProject Reformed Christianity articles
1859:Start-Class Reformed Christianity articles
1849:Top-importance Christian theology articles
1722:I have just modified one external link on
1567:https://de.wikipedia.org/Eduard_Thurneysen
1259:Do you mean "his brother Richard Niebuhr"?
226:
47:
1692:Article in Knowledge (XXG) on Karl Barth
1079:The Blackwell Companion to Protestantism
465:page and redirected it to this page. --
435:I've made some edits to reflect this. --
125:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Christianity
1844:Start-Class Christian theology articles
1669:was invoked but never defined (see the
1655:
228:
49:
1854:Christian theology work group articles
1085:biblical-based accounts of Chrisitan
7:
1839:Top-importance Christianity articles
310:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Religion
274:This article is within the scope of
105:This article is within the scope of
1661:
1601:There has never been a page called
1043:Bultmannianism after World War II."
38:It is of interest to the following
14:
1874:WikiProject Christianity articles
1834:Start-Class Christianity articles
1726:. Please take a moment to review
210:WikiProject Reformed Christianity
128:Template:WikiProject Christianity
1884:Top-importance Religion articles
261:
251:
230:
194:
92:
82:
51:
20:
681:scholarship sees many problems.
330:This article has been rated as
145:This article has been rated as
1469:Would like to see this sourced
579:Issues in Science and Religion
1:
1889:WikiProject Religion articles
1879:Start-Class Religion articles
1820:06:52, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
1528:14:25, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
1513:23:06, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
1489:19:47, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
402:15:14, 10 February 2005 (UTC)
313:Template:WikiProject Religion
207:This article is supported by
167:This article is supported by
119:and see a list of open tasks.
1557:18:49, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
1464:17:43, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
790:. Your changes are not. --
693:) 22:51, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
377:22:40, 3 November 2004 (UTC)
202:Reformed Christianity portal
1581:14:05, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
760:website provides a link to
457:I came across a redlink to
1905:
1783:(last update: 5 June 2024)
1719:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
1615:04:58, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
1596:02:46, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
413:Karl Barth is listed as a
336:project's importance scale
151:project's importance scale
1710:16:44, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
1645:16:48, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
1446:Does it at all relate to
1434:10:21, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
1413:01:01, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
1389:12:09, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
1354:11:06, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
1335:11:06, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
1309:02:26, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
1286:01:58, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
1269:16:54, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
1255:01:24, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
1229:00:33, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
1142:00:21, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
1128:23:48, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
1109:20:34, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
1068:20:22, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
1015:19:52, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
870:16:14, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
856:16:09, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
800:13:11, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
774:12:55, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
752:12:50, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
725:23:52, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
710:23:07, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
691:00:07, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
668:22:43, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
634:22:24, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
615:17:23, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
599:13:46, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
564:20:57, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
518:20:57, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
439:04:50, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
431:04:37, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
329:
246:
190:
166:
144:
77:
46:
1630:20:45, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
1505:FiredanceThroughTheNight
549:12:52, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
534:13:28, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
503:12:04, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
488:11:40, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
446:06:56, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
300:standards, or visit the
108:WikiProject Christianity
1715:External links modified
1586:it it. I'll asl around.
1315:Encyclopedia Americana
1215:, progress, politics,
881:Encyclopedia Americana
493:given in a day or two.
421:Modernist_Christianity
187:
163:
28:This article is rated
930:. Its chief prophet,
570:Reversion explanation
459:Neo-orthodox Theology
400:comment was added at
186:
162:
131:Christianity articles
68:Reformed Christianity
32:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
1764:regular verification
1665:The named reference
473:Documentation needed
278:WikiProject Religion
1754:After February 2018
740:usually disparaging
170:theology work group
100:Christianity portal
1808:InternetArchiveBot
1759:InternetArchiveBot
1448:Lutheran Orthodoxy
1442:Lutheran Orthodoxy
1319:H. Richard Niebuhr
1188:H. Richard Niebuhr
1180:Friedrich Gogarten
1075:Alister E. McGrath
875:Requested evidence
840:H. Richard Niebuhr
418:
415:liberal theologian
290:assess and improve
188:
164:
34:content assessment
1784:
1603:Eduard Thurneysen
1549:David Lloyd-Jones
1501:Eastern Orthodoxy
1495:Eastern Orthodoxy
1479:comment added by
1111:
1095:comment added by
1070:
1054:comment added by
1017:
1001:comment added by
976:Soren Kierkegaard
656:pseudo-skepticism
469:12 December 2005
412:
404:
379:
363:comment added by
350:
349:
346:
345:
342:
341:
316:Religion articles
304:for more details.
225:
224:
221:
220:
1896:
1818:
1809:
1782:
1781:
1760:
1685:
1682:
1676:
1675:
1674:
1668:
1660:
1491:
1460:
1323:Reinhold Niebuhr
1243:Reinhold Niebuhr
1239:Reinhold Niebuhr
1234:Will this do???
1197:liberal theology
1192:Reinhold Niebuhr
1163:
1162:
1158:
1090:
1049:
996:
988:Jean-Paul Sartre
980:Martin Heidegger
969:Reinhold Niebuhr
965:(Matthew 19:26).
838:(1892-1971) and
836:Reinhold Niebuhr
730:a movement. See
676:'s attention to
652:User:Mtalleyrand
640:User:Mtalleyrand
395:
358:
318:
317:
314:
311:
308:
302:wikiproject page
271:
266:
265:
255:
248:
247:
242:
234:
227:
204:
199:
198:
133:
132:
129:
126:
123:
102:
97:
96:
86:
79:
78:
73:
70:
55:
48:
31:
25:
24:
16:
1904:
1903:
1899:
1898:
1897:
1895:
1894:
1893:
1824:
1823:
1812:
1807:
1775:
1768:have permission
1758:
1732:this simple FaQ
1717:
1712:
1694:
1689:
1688:
1683:
1679:
1666:
1664:
1662:
1657:
1652:
1564:
1535:
1497:
1474:
1471:
1456:
1444:
1164:
1160:
1156:
1154:
1153:
1082:
1029:
913:
877:
780:Merriam-webster
758:Merriam-webster
736:Merriam-webster
674:User:Firefly322
648:Templeton Prize
572:
475:
455:
410:
385:
383:Cross reference
355:
315:
312:
309:
306:
305:
269:Religion portal
267:
260:
240:
200:
193:
130:
127:
124:
121:
120:
98:
91:
71:
61:
29:
12:
11:
5:
1902:
1900:
1892:
1891:
1886:
1881:
1876:
1871:
1866:
1861:
1856:
1851:
1846:
1841:
1836:
1826:
1825:
1802:
1801:
1794:
1747:
1746:
1738:Added archive
1716:
1713:
1695:
1693:
1690:
1687:
1686:
1677:
1654:
1653:
1651:
1648:
1618:
1617:
1563:
1560:
1534:
1531:
1496:
1493:
1470:
1467:
1443:
1440:
1439:
1438:
1437:
1436:
1400:
1399:
1398:
1397:
1396:
1395:
1394:
1393:
1392:
1391:
1376:
1363:
1362:
1361:
1360:
1359:
1358:
1357:
1356:
1337:
1291:
1290:
1289:
1288:
1232:
1231:
1152:
1150:
1149:
1148:
1147:
1146:
1145:
1144:
1081:
1072:
1047:
1046:
1045:
1044:
1037:
1036:
1028:
1019:
994:
993:
992:
991:
972:
961:
958:
955:
952:
948:
947:
940:
939:
923:
922:
912:
909:
908:
907:
902:Brunner, Emil
900:
876:
873:
829:
828:
827:
826:
825:
824:
823:
822:
821:
820:
819:
818:
817:
816:
776:
754:
732:Meriam-Webster
636:
571:
568:
567:
566:
521:
520:
474:
471:
454:
451:
450:
449:
448:
447:
409:
406:
384:
381:
354:
351:
348:
347:
344:
343:
340:
339:
332:Top-importance
328:
322:
321:
319:
273:
272:
256:
244:
243:
241:Top‑importance
235:
223:
222:
219:
218:
215:Top-importance
206:
205:
189:
179:
178:
175:Top-importance
165:
155:
154:
147:Top-importance
143:
137:
136:
134:
117:the discussion
104:
103:
87:
75:
74:
72:Top‑importance
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1901:
1890:
1887:
1885:
1882:
1880:
1877:
1875:
1872:
1870:
1867:
1865:
1862:
1860:
1857:
1855:
1852:
1850:
1847:
1845:
1842:
1840:
1837:
1835:
1832:
1831:
1829:
1822:
1821:
1816:
1811:
1810:
1799:
1795:
1792:
1788:
1787:
1786:
1779:
1773:
1769:
1765:
1761:
1755:
1750:
1745:
1741:
1737:
1736:
1735:
1733:
1729:
1725:
1724:Neo-orthodoxy
1720:
1714:
1711:
1707:
1703:
1699:
1691:
1681:
1678:
1672:
1659:
1656:
1649:
1647:
1646:
1642:
1638:
1632:
1631:
1627:
1623:
1616:
1612:
1608:
1604:
1600:
1599:
1598:
1597:
1593:
1589:
1583:
1582:
1578:
1574:
1569:
1568:
1561:
1559:
1558:
1554:
1550:
1546:
1542:
1538:
1532:
1530:
1529:
1525:
1521:
1515:
1514:
1510:
1506:
1502:
1494:
1492:
1490:
1486:
1482:
1478:
1468:
1466:
1465:
1461:
1459:
1453:
1449:
1441:
1435:
1431:
1427:
1423:
1419:
1418:
1417:
1416:
1415:
1414:
1410:
1406:
1390:
1386:
1382:
1377:
1373:
1372:
1371:
1370:
1369:
1368:
1367:
1366:
1365:
1364:
1355:
1351:
1347:
1343:
1338:
1336:
1332:
1328:
1324:
1320:
1316:
1312:
1311:
1310:
1306:
1302:
1297:
1296:
1295:
1294:
1293:
1292:
1287:
1283:
1279:
1275:
1274:
1273:
1272:
1271:
1270:
1266:
1262:
1257:
1256:
1252:
1248:
1244:
1240:
1235:
1230:
1226:
1222:
1218:
1214:
1210:
1206:
1202:
1198:
1193:
1189:
1185:
1181:
1177:
1173:
1169:
1168:
1167:
1159:
1151:
1143:
1139:
1135:
1131:
1130:
1129:
1125:
1121:
1116:
1115:
1114:
1113:
1112:
1110:
1106:
1102:
1098:
1094:
1088:
1080:
1076:
1071:
1069:
1065:
1061:
1057:
1053:
1041:
1040:
1039:
1038:
1034:
1033:
1032:
1027:
1023:
1018:
1016:
1012:
1008:
1004:
1000:
989:
985:
981:
977:
973:
970:
966:
962:
959:
956:
953:
950:
949:
945:
942:
941:
937:
933:
929:
925:
924:
920:
917:
916:
915:
914:
910:
905:
901:
898:
894:
893:
892:
890:
886:
882:
874:
872:
871:
867:
863:
858:
857:
853:
849:
843:
841:
837:
832:
815:
812:
808:
803:
802:
801:
797:
793:
789:
785:
781:
777:
775:
771:
767:
763:
759:
755:
753:
749:
745:
741:
737:
733:
728:
727:
726:
722:
718:
713:
712:
711:
707:
703:
699:
695:
694:
692:
688:
684:
679:
675:
671:
670:
669:
665:
661:
657:
653:
649:
645:
641:
638:Let me quote
637:
635:
631:
627:
623:
618:
617:
616:
612:
608:
603:
602:
601:
600:
596:
592:
588:
584:
580:
576:
569:
565:
561:
557:
553:
552:
551:
550:
546:
542:
536:
535:
531:
527:
519:
515:
511:
507:
506:
505:
504:
500:
496:
490:
489:
485:
481:
472:
470:
468:
464:
460:
452:
445:
441:
440:
438:
434:
433:
432:
430:
426:
422:
416:
407:
405:
403:
399:
394:
390:
382:
380:
378:
374:
370:
366:
362:
352:
337:
333:
327:
324:
323:
320:
303:
299:
295:
291:
287:
286:
281:
280:
279:
270:
264:
259:
257:
254:
250:
249:
245:
239:
236:
233:
229:
216:
213:(assessed as
212:
211:
203:
197:
192:
185:
181:
180:
176:
173:(assessed as
172:
171:
161:
157:
156:
152:
148:
142:
139:
138:
135:
118:
114:
110:
109:
101:
95:
90:
88:
85:
81:
80:
76:
69:
65:
60:
57:
54:
50:
45:
41:
35:
27:
23:
18:
17:
1806:
1803:
1778:source check
1757:
1751:
1748:
1721:
1718:
1680:
1663:Cite error:
1658:
1633:
1619:
1584:
1573:MaynardClark
1570:
1565:
1547:
1543:
1539:
1536:
1516:
1498:
1481:91.176.103.3
1472:
1457:
1445:
1401:
1258:
1236:
1233:
1184:Paul Tillich
1176:Emil Brunner
1165:
1083:
1048:
1030:
1022:Paul Tillich
995:
984:Karl Jaspers
964:
943:
935:
918:
903:
896:
895:Barth, Karl
888:
884:
878:
859:
844:
833:
830:
811:Carolmooredc
739:
700:will help.--
573:
537:
522:
491:
476:
456:
411:
386:
365:198.151.35.6
356:
331:
292:articles to
283:
276:
275:
208:
168:
146:
122:Christianity
113:Christianity
106:
59:Christianity
40:WikiProjects
1475:—Preceding
1091:—Preceding
1050:—Preceding
997:—Preceding
788:Ian Barbour
717:Mtalleyrand
683:Mtalleyrand
644:Ian Barbour
622:Ian Barbour
607:Mtalleyrand
583:Mtalleyrand
575:Ian Barbour
556:Mtalleyrand
541:Mtalleyrand
526:Mtalleyrand
510:Mtalleyrand
495:Mtalleyrand
480:Mtalleyrand
467:FurciferRNB
396:—Preceding
359:—Preceding
30:Start-class
1828:Categories
1815:Report bug
1698:Karl Barth
1650:References
1562:Thurneysen
1520:Beau in NC
1426:Firefly322
1346:Firefly322
1327:Firefly322
1278:Firefly322
1221:Firefly322
1172:Karl Barth
1134:Firefly322
1097:Firefly322
1056:Firefly322
1003:Firefly322
932:Karl Barth
792:Firefly322
784:Britannica
766:Firefly322
762:Britannica
744:Firefly322
702:Firefly322
660:Firefly322
626:Firefly322
591:Firefly322
425:Liberalism
408:Karl Barth
1798:this tool
1791:this tool
1671:help page
1622:Dgndenver
1588:Dgndenver
1405:Redheylin
1381:Redheylin
1301:Redheylin
1247:Redheylin
1209:Holocaust
1120:Redheylin
862:Redheylin
848:Redheylin
756:Also the
1804:Cheers.—
1607:Rmhermen
1477:unsigned
1454:dixit. (
1213:religion
1203:and the
1105:contribs
1093:unsigned
1064:contribs
1052:unsigned
1013:) 19:03-
1011:contribs
999:unsigned
891::691-92
463:Theology
444:Randolph
437:Randolph
429:Randolph
373:contribs
361:unsigned
307:Religion
285:Religion
238:Religion
64:Theology
1728:my edit
1342:WP:BITE
1217:science
946::691-92
899::276-77
461:on the
398:undated
353:Editing
334:on the
149:on the
1702:Vorbee
1637:Vorbee
1452:Rursus
1422:WP:AGF
1261:Vorbee
1190:, and
1155:": -->
1087:praxis
986:, and
936:Romans
928:Newman
911:Quotes
887::660;
814:{talk}
650:. So
605:along.
389:Fintor
36:scale.
1205:world
678:WP:EW
587:WP:OR
524:term.
1706:talk
1641:talk
1626:talk
1611:talk
1592:talk
1577:talk
1553:talk
1524:talk
1509:talk
1485:talk
1458:bork
1430:talk
1409:talk
1385:talk
1350:talk
1344:. --
1331:talk
1321:and
1305:talk
1282:talk
1265:talk
1251:talk
1225:talk
1157:edit
1138:talk
1124:talk
1101:talk
1060:talk
1007:talk
921::660
906::654
866:talk
852:talk
796:talk
782:and
778:Are
770:talk
748:talk
742:. --
721:talk
706:talk
698:WP:3
687:talk
664:talk
630:talk
611:talk
595:talk
560:talk
545:talk
530:talk
514:talk
499:talk
484:talk
453:Link
417:, so
393:talk
369:talk
296:and
294:good
1772:RfC
1742:to
1667:BR1
1462:!)
1201:God
1077:'s
1024:'s
589:.--
326:Top
298:1.0
141:Top
1830::
1785:.
1780:}}
1776:{{
1708:)
1684:EA
1673:).
1643:)
1628:)
1613:)
1594:)
1579:)
1555:)
1526:)
1511:)
1487:)
1432:)
1411:)
1387:)
1352:)
1333:)
1307:)
1284:)
1267:)
1253:)
1227:)
1186:,
1182:,
1178:,
1174:,
1140:)
1126:)
1107:)
1103:•
1066:)
1062:•
1009:•
982:,
944:22
889:22
868:)
854:)
798:)
772:)
750:)
723:)
708:)
689:)
666:)
632:)
613:)
597:)
562:)
547:)
532:)
516:)
501:)
486:)
391:|
375:)
371:•
217:).
177:).
66:/
62::
1817:)
1813:(
1800:.
1793:.
1704:(
1639:(
1624:(
1609:(
1590:(
1575:(
1551:(
1522:(
1507:(
1483:(
1428:(
1407:(
1383:(
1348:(
1329:(
1303:(
1280:(
1263:(
1249:(
1223:(
1161:]
1136:(
1122:(
1099:(
1058:(
1005:(
919:6
904:4
897:3
885:6
864:(
850:(
794:(
768:(
746:(
719:(
704:(
685:(
662:(
628:(
609:(
593:(
558:(
543:(
528:(
512:(
497:(
482:(
367:(
338:.
153:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
