854:
cannibalism. Simply a matter of perspective, or an inaccuracy? Nothing 'nativist' about pointing out that many of the early visitors to Yuquot stayed a short while, and brought with them a whole lot of preconceptions about what they were seeing: nothing new about pointing out that outside observers, with little or no knowledge of the local language, and relationships of purely commercial, and later, institutional interest with local groups produce very partial, often inaccurate accounts. That said, I find Jewitt's account informative, even when it offers a version of events that differ from the local history: on the flip side, i recall an illustration of a northern nuu-chah-nulth village from one of the spanish expeditions, in which the house fronts are depicted with polka dots. Clearly, the illustrator was at a distance, or couldn't render the images, so he fudged it. And Meares ("liar Meares" according to the maquinna we're discussing) provided accounts that were intentionally fantastical, to shore up his tenuous claims. A couple of these were "white men", though the spaniard was more likely beige...so what? I in fact agree with much of your commentary, though it drifts into characteristic (in light of your other posts, on this and other forums) polemic at the end. I'd suggest you've attached a lot of what are clearly personal pet peeves regarding history to my comments unfairly. I don't see it said anywhere in my comments that white accounts are to be entirely disregarded; seems much of your post, in reference to my comments, is itself bad history. From one dumb white man to another, regards. Woodschmoe, July 2006.
835:"demonstrated" is not quite the proper verb there, unless you expect the First Nations account to be more reliable than anyone else's, simpy because it's First Nations. That's not how the world works; or we'd accept the Turkish version of Albanian and Greek history, or the Japanese version of the history of the Manchukuo. Good history relies on telling all sides of the story; blanket denials based on the skin colour or cultural origin of the person making the account are not valid, nor should they be expected to be simply because a name/person "belongs" to a given people. Denial of someone else's account to the point of excluding it altogether is, to me, dishonest (by which I mean things like reports of cannibalism by the early mariners - who had seen such practices elsewhere and could not have been "mistaken because they were dumb white men", as some nativists like to claim - cannot be excluded; they can be
875:, maybe they deserve to be forgotten, how's that? And yeah, your comment about "demonstrated to be inaccurate" set me off about a lot of C*R*A*P heard/seen in soc.culture.native and L-CHINOOK about whitey not knowing what he was talking about and only indigenous accounts being trustworthy/valid; the implication was there that that's where you were coming from, or your sources were, so I reacted, yes reacted, accordingly; and cannibalism being the most polemical I brought it up, partly because of a passage in Pethick's book I came across the other day which I pondered adding to the article; I just got up so will find the passage later and post it here for your consideration; since you're evidently more of an expert on the Nuu-chah-nulth than I ever could be or would want to be. I simply wrote the original base-article because it was
859:
off-the-cuff in about four minutes (I type 110+wpm) and generally don't "rehearse"; same as your jibe about my "pet peeves" and such = whichever talk forums, be it on Oregon or the nauseous p.c.rewrite of
Canadian-Chinese history, or Central Canadian biases concerning BC, or American biases (APOV) on the Alaska boundary and others, it's not "pet peeves", it's concern for truth, especially for overturning shibboleths and dearly-held mythologies which; very much like the Nuu-chah-nulth concern for having their history accounted for correctly. But I'll tell you what; it would help if they sat down and made a point of circulating it; I made my contributions in Maquinna, Mowachaht, and here
871:, as also with many other BC First Nations historical figures, vs. the plethora of such articles in the Hew Hess of Hay. Nothing in Wiki is ever "done", that's a given. I was trying to begin the process of filling in the blanks; maybe I should have just let Wikidom ignore Maquinna's existence and not bothered trying to expand the Nuu-chah-nulth or Mowahchaht articles either; if people can't be bothered to take part in the writing of their own history, but then take offense when someone else makes and earnest effort to based on available materials and exposure
85:
64:
264:
198:
719:
marriage, kinship, and trade. Names from one group appear in another; the Makah potentially trace their origin to the
Northern part of Vancouver Island, and maintain relations along the west coast. The name "nuu chah nulth" was chosen by the people themselves, to reflect the depth of their historic relationships. Rivalry is no indication of profound division: numerous stories describe intense rivalries between chiefs of the same village....Woodschmoe, Dec. 2005
907:
about 30 per cent of the native-origin words in CJ; it's fourth over all after
Chinookan, French and English, and is followed by Chehalis and some smatterings of Kwakiutl and plateau languages (but no one ever recorded the Hawaiian, Russian, Chinese, Gaelic, Portuguese, Algonkian etc components and regional peculiarities that are mentioned in some accounts - which apparently were many; most CJ lexicons are based on Columbia River Jargon)
709:
rather than on historical political relationships (or animosities vs alliances); I'm in no position to want to get in a bad-history squabble ("it's not your place to say that!") nor to write up the details, but in the early pre-colony days and for a few decades after the chiefs of what is now the Nuu-chah-nulth were all rivals, if not entirely enemies (which they were often enough, as so famously with
Wickanninish and Maquinna).
313:
292:
508:
188:
161:
1308:). The crafters of the ethnicities and tribes naming convention (which your guideline violates) clearly respected our collective decisions/consensus from long ago re both standalone names without "people/tribe/nation/peoples" unless absolutely necessary and also re the use of endonyms where available; but when I brought it up in the RMs of last year you insulted and baited me and
33:
863:, at least anything much more than a stub; I "winged it" in order to un-redlink other pages' articles and also because the Maquinna in question was ref'd in those articles (which none of the others have reason to be, except maybe the most recent guy concerning Luna the killer whale, if there's an article on that). And when I said I'd "done" Maquinna I didn't mean I'd
383:
898:
of a more accurate article. If you laid down the bones, good on you: hopefully someone else adds more. I'm done. Nothing personal intended, apart from an initial reactionary tone; the rest seems fair and topical to me. Congrats on breaking the 5 minute barrier on your last post; they said it couldn't be done. Woodschmoe, July 2006
830:
just felt there wasn't enough here. I'm aware of the chiefly-lineage thing; same deal with
Kiyapilano (Capilano) and Kahtsahlano (Kitsilano) in the Vancouver area; there are still chiefs with those names/ titles; the article should explain that and maybe list the succession of Maquinnas. But there's a
1464:
Is that a template or just a copy-paste you're using to repeat your post across all these RMs? Hell I guess I'll copy paste to, since I'm replying to the same as-if-bot-generated comment. Here are view stats that debunk the premise that "people-language pairs" are a legitimate primarytopic equation,
1449:
There was a discussion and a subsequent unanimous vote in favor of explicit disambiguation of people–language pairs. "Nuu-chah-nulth" can refer to both the people and the language, which means it falls under "Where a common name exists in
English for both a people and their language, a title based on
858:
Well, hell, trying to write First
Nations/Native American articles is like walking on eggshells; you try and do good and inevitably someone sees ill in whatever you do; and to me it strikes me that you're being patronizing with this comment about my reply to you being "well-rehearsed"; it was written
811:
I took a stab at frameworks on some Nuu-chah-nulth history, partly as spinoffs of geographic or other historical or First
Nations articles; just writing from the seat of my pants so anyone who knows better/more please rewrite/augment. Haven't dared write much because I haven't studied them in detail,
897:
Apologies, Skookum1, for a patronizing tone indeed; it was in response to a lecturing one. I cannot speak for the Nuu chah nulth, nor am i an expert, as you mention (though in a fashion which suggests sarcasm: no matter...), but my entries here, and accompanying discussions are simply in the service
829:
Look, I "winged it" when I created/expanded the
Maquinna article from what I knew from the books I've read, which range from anthro-ethno works and First Nations-flavoured accounts to Pethick's excerpts from the early mariner's journals; anybody can change anything in Wiki, and you're welcome too; I
679:
Some preferred-spelling native-perfect versions of names are in current political/organizational use, e.g. Tla-oh-quiat - which is the same word as
Clayoquot, just transliterated differently. So there Tla-oh-quiat (or whatever sp. the band uses for itself) and there's the IPA-ish linguist's version.
664:
then I would be in agreement that a change is not required, following the Germany/Deutchland explanation. But it is disrespectful to the Nuu-Chah-Nulth for us to choose a different name be the most prominent reference to them on Knowledge. Additionally on most if not all of the Government of British
651:
The information added about the origin of the Nootka and Nuu-Chah-Nulth names is helpful, but I too believe this article should be renamed. The article relates to a people, and they have the right to name themselves as they choose and we should use that name as much as we can. Other examples of this
1268:
There was a discussion once on whether the ethnicity should have precedence for the name, and it was decided it shouldn't. That could be revisited. But it really should be one discussion on the principle, not thousands of separate discussions at every ethnicity in the world over whether it should
853:
Clearly a well rehearsed lecture, but to follow one of your points (I will have to track down the precise citation later, as it is in my archives)an early european witness to Maquinna noted him sucking blood from a cut on his arm: it was cited in the 'historic' account of the witness as evidence of
825:
I have updated the page, based upon established sources: scholarly, archival, and from interviews with members of various Nuu-chah-nulth nations. I would caution having 'done' Maquinna, etc. as one must answer 'which one?' there have been numerous Maquinnas through history, and the name is still in
704:
Nootkas, the line and people of Maquinna (I've met one or two). People less read-up on native affairs still use Nootka to refer to the Nuu-chah-nulth; and that name kinda also means the Nitinat, too, in an old-fashioned historical way (19th C books); BC politicians/media/educators will consistently
1486:
Well, that's better than the 8:1 and 5:1 we've seen elsewhere anyway. your premise that "people-language pairs" exist as equally primary topics is rubbish, and demonstrable over and over again; one of the many flawed in NCL. Next time your crew revises that guideline, you should learn some math
708:
It's also worth mentioning that prior to the Indian Act and the cultural survival imperative after the Conversion and the Potlach Laws and all that, the Nuu-chah-nulth as a group were not organized as one entity; but wound up that way from bureaucratic structures built upon the language divisions,
1298:
added as you rewrote your guideline to promote/enact. It says quite the opposite; the CRITERIA page also says that prior consensus should be respected, and those who crafted it an attempt to contact them towards building a new consensus done; and calls for consistency within related topics which
906:
The etymologies provided for many/ten/hiyu (hyo in Jewittian Nuu-chah-nulth transcription) and siah/far/sky are from Shaw, as repeated ad nauseam by Chinookologists since. Links provided later once I find the correct page refs. IIRC Nuu-chah-nulth/Southern Wakashan is supposed to have contributed
1241:
of users, two - no three - have engaged in insults against me is beyond smug to the point of ridiculousness; an RfC may be required to change that guideline, as it's clear I'm shut out of any process involving that group of editors, who have been relentlessly contrarian and hostile to anything
699:
BTW I think if someone in BC, at least someone knowledgeable about First Nations, were to have said "so you a Nootka?" it would be taken for granted that whomever said it already the person was from Nootka Sound or Gold River or elsewhere on Nootka Sound. i.e. that the person was "A Nootka from
1691:
of UBC to conduct a genetic survey on the Nuu-chah-nulth to investigate a high rate of rheumatoid disease; the ~900 participants gave consent to medical research only. Shortly after collecting blood samples, Ward moved to Utah (and eventually Oxford), taking the samples with him and using them
718:
I too wish to avoid a 'bad history squabble', so suffice to say that a critical portion of the above declaration is historically incorrect. In the early pre-colony days SOME of these nations were rivals and enemies: but others were closely allied. All groups are deeply interrelated by ties of
611:
True, but the place name was imposed by the same people who declared the people to be Nootka: so I don't think that this fact has any bearing on the question at hand. As mentioned, the Nuu-chah-nulth themselves have far older, still existent place names for these locations, so to refer to the
568:
There is a convention, in English, and in other languages, to use the names of geographic locations that are traditional in those languages -- even when knowledgeable people know that the locals have a totally different name. Locals call it Deutchland, English speakers call it Germany, French
1324:
but that's a crock. The way to "address this issue properly" is to examine all of these, but bulk of them needless directs from then-long-standing titles moved by yourself, one by one as I was instructed/advised re the bulk RMs; as case-by-case decisions are needed. You want a centralized
834:
chief Maquinna in the early history of Contact here, which most people searching for the name are going to look for/expect to find. As for "demonstrated to be inaccurate" I gather you mean that the white accounts of him are to be considered discredited by the First Nations oral history;
595:
Well, on the west coast of Vancouver Island the term Nootka is rarely used. In newspapers, museums, and in speech Nuu-Chah-Nulth is much more common. It's possible this is a local thing, and that Nootka is the more commonplace term in the outside world. But it struck me as
520:
1554:
Hasn't actually expanded much since May 2006; has a number of sources/external links, but relatively few inline citations. A number of empty sections suggest the depth of information that could be here on Nuuchahnulth history, customs, dress, etc. etc., but isn't.
812:
only know what I've picked up from newspapers and various histories over the years..Maquinna and Mowachaht I think I've done already; have to flesh out Maquinna after rereading some accounts, and do some of the other historic chiefs, like Wickanninish. See also
578:
Should I try my best to use the aboriginal place-names? When should I try to use aboriginal place-names? Should I try to use them when I am probably going to mangle them? I think I probably shouldn't try to use an aboriginal place-name when it will confuse my
1293:
that's fine to say about a discussion that you presided over on an isolated guideline talkpage that you didn't invite anyone but your friends into..... WP:ETHNICGROUPS is clear on the variability of "X", "Xs", or "X people" and says nothing being people
1288:
LOL that's funny I already tried that and got criticized for mis-procedure. Your pet guideline was never discussed at a central location nor even brought up with other affected/conflicting guidelines nor any relevant wikiprojects. And as for
826:
use today. I presume you refer to the Maquinna of Cook's time, but I think it is worth noting this, and would caution that much of the historic information regarding these chiefs has been demonstrated to be inaccurate....Woodschmoe, Dec. 2005
632:
I have added some information about the origin of the name. I think that should suffice, as opposed to a rename of the article. I've also broken the article into sections, as I would (eventually) like to add some info about their mythology.
143:
790:
Heya, I'm planning on expanding this whole article (about 800 words added) including greater detail into some areas like food and society. I might end up changing the formatting of the page to ensure that it flows as a full article.
786:
This page really needs to be expanded as it pretty much only talks aboutthe language right now. I'd like to know more about the history of the Nootka, and their current population and it's evolution. as well as their culture.
1303:
long ago had devised the use of "FOO" and often "PREFERRED ENDONYM" (for Canada especially, where such terms are common English now and your pet terms are obsolete and in disuse and often of clearly racist origin e.g.
1422:
per CambridgeBayWeather. In cases where the requested move simply eliminates the word "people", and the destination title is already a simple redirect to the current title, it is clear that guidelines favoring both
1727:
133:
1732:
605:
BTW, Nootka IS a place name - eg Nootka Sound, Nootka Island. That is the correct, established name for those locations. But the name of the native group is more properly Nuu-Chah-Nulth, in my opinion.
1144:
recommends the former arrangement we seem to have an emerging consensus that the PRIMARYTOPIC claim takes precedence. As with the others the issue will benefit from a wider discussion as mentioned.--
109:
982:
Most articles on indigenous nation in the Northwest Coast negate any mention of the present day Indigenous. I agree that it does need work on. Other notable people to include would be Art Thompson,
1722:
1450:
that term, with explicit disambiguation, is preferred for both articles". "Nuu-chah-nulth" was made a dab page in response to this guideline, only to be made a redirect later without discussion. --
986:(Current BC AFN Reigional Chief), and information about the current treaty process, although that is going to be "news" in the next few weeks with the Maa-nulth treaty group going to vote soon.
766:
I'm having a hard time understanding the references vs the footnotes, are they basically the same thing? Does it really matter where I put my citations/references as long as they're present??? (
705:
use Nuu-chah-nulth over Nootka (except for Nootka Sound) although specific First Nation/band/reserve/village names are often used instead, or at least in addition to the collective grouping.
92:
69:
665:
Columbia websites the term Nuu-Chah-Nulth is used. We have a choice to either strengthen a disrespectful, inaccurate label, or we can choose to help promote a people's chosen identity.
1225:"We" is not all of Knowledge obviously, it's you, Kwami and Uysvdi and other NCL regulars concocting a bad guideline (which is not a "policy") that is in conflict with various others.
1398:
466:
439:
429:
569:
speakers call it Allegmagne. It is not an insult to Deutchlanders that we call them Germans. When HMCS Chicoutimi had its accident an Irish coroner was totally unable to say
414:
1185:
should be the title and not other articles whose titles devolved from the name of this group of peoples or their organizations. Target page was moved to current title on
1752:
444:
434:
929:
so any additions relating to governmental organization, chiefs and councillors, resource and development issues as definecd by the First Nation(s) etc should go there.
1742:
244:
1767:
1629:
1625:
1611:
363:
353:
1347:
No, no-one would criticize you for discussing this rationally. But this multitude of move requests is disruptive. They should all be closed without prejudice. —
479:
1772:
1747:
424:
532:
1737:
1405:
also applies given that Nuu-chah-nulth is a redirect here. There is no need to redo any guideline as it already supports the un-disabiguated title.
475:
329:
943:
This is all written rather as if the Nuu-chah-nulth are only in the past. There is at least one quite prominent present-day Nuu-chah-nulth, artist
1762:
254:
328:, nationalities, and other cultural identities on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
273:
171:
1757:
97:
1237:
have to say about this. The smugness in your suggestion for me to "try to change the guideline" in in a space dominated by the same small
1123:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
968:
387:
320:
297:
105:
1607:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
220:
1151:
1597:
1541:, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
1207:. We have policy that the people should go at "XXX people" and the language at "XXX language", with "XXX" being a dab page, see
1687:
I was kind of surprised to not see anything about this on the page. In short, in the 1980s, Health Canada provided funding to
1291:"There was a discussion once on whether the ethnicity should have precedence for the name, and it was decided it shouldn't"
1692:
extensively for anthropological studies, without getting renewed consent, or ever publishing anything medically relevant.
1410:
926:
879:. If that's reason to patronize me, or dump on my efforts, then enjoy your smugness. You may be a dumb white guy; I'm not.
618:
Nuu-Chah-Nulth is approximately pronounced noo-CHAW-nulth, but I would be unqualified to render it into Sampa or IPA. :)
573:. It is hard to understand why. But you and I would almost certainly stumble if we tried to pronouce a Gaelic place-name.
1672:
211:
166:
101:
44:
1368:
per nom. An identified people should be the primary topic of a term absent something remarkable standing in the way.
1114:
1045:
1693:
1628:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
921:
Not sure who's monitoring this page; the lengthy section on the meanings of placenames should be transferred to
1406:
1402:
1394:
796:
771:
972:
1663:
1589:
1024:
922:
1585:
1137:
1019:
401:
1096:
which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —
1647:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
1635:
1517:
1352:
1274:
1234:
1162:
1124:
1093:
1014:
50:
1588:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
563:
that is redirected to Nootka. So, anyone who searches for Nuu-Chah-Nulth, finds the page in question...
680:
Same with the differences in sp. I've seen in St'at'imcets language-books vs in academic works citing
1226:
1148:
964:
739:
1040:
32:
1556:
792:
767:
524:
219:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
108:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
84:
63:
1492:
1334:
1247:
1230:
1194:
634:
619:
540:
511:
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between
1632:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
1648:
685:
263:
1704:
1455:
1428:
1424:
1216:
1009:
987:
1598:
https://web.archive.org/web/20050209143218/http://www.magma.ca/%7Estonham/nootka/ntk_txt.html
750:
Two more (I haven't added them because I don't have the time or knowledge to evaluate them):
1378:
1348:
1270:
1263:
until the issue is addressed properly. These should be discussed at a centralized location.
1035:
952:
1655:
1476:
1436:
1238:
1145:
1060:
736:
693:
455:
17:
1470:
684:
words, but using a different orthographical system. All gets pretty confusing. Same with
1688:
681:
660:, who were previously referred to as Eskimos. If this were a geographic article for say
584:
Have you considered putting a wikiquote of the correct pronunciation of Nuu-Chah-Nulth?
1699:
I'm not sure where/if this should go on the page, but it seems potentially relevant? --
1614:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
1581:
1316:
and were in fact dismissive about any such effort. Pfft. NCLANG fans like to pretend
1242:
upsetting the applecart they carefully concocted to please themselves..and no one else.
1182:
1166:
1065:
732:
560:
1654:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
1716:
1601:
1548:
1538:
1488:
1330:
1317:
1305:
1243:
1208:
1190:
1141:
1097:
1070:
1055:
930:
908:
889:
880:
844:
817:
710:
666:
585:
536:
203:
1569:
Last edited at 22:04, 29 July 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 01:37, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
873:
but it's still not good enough for the people who didn't want to write it themselves
754:
1700:
1507:
1451:
1212:
1075:
1004:
813:
661:
325:
312:
291:
653:
1621:
1369:
1083:
decide on which spelling system rfor Nuu-chah-nulth language should be standard.
1050:
983:
948:
612:
European names as 'correct' is a matter of perspective....woodschmoe, Dec. 2005
507:
843:
simply because the writer of the journal in question was white; that's racist).
751:
1620:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
1516:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a
1432:
1136:
As with the others, we appear to have solid consensus that the people are the
193:
187:
160:
944:
758:
421:
Articles about ethnic groups that currently have issues needing resolution:
415:
Resolve the disparity in importance rankings among different ethnic groups
947:(hmm, guess I'll start that article). I suspect that there are others. -
324:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to
1708:
1677:
1559:
1496:
1459:
1440:
1414:
1383:
1356:
1338:
1278:
1251:
1220:
1198:
1156:
1100:
990:
976:
955:
933:
911:
892:
883:
847:
820:
800:
775:
761:
713:
689:
544:
382:
728:
216:
888:
PS That wasn't "rehearsed" either; and written in about 4.5 minutes.
1171:
moved to "Nuu-chah-nulth (disambiguation)" by Uysvdi on Dec 29 2011
555:
This page should be retitled Nuu-Chah-Nulth. Nootka is a misnomer.
657:
449:
26:
262:
1728:
Low-importance Indigenous peoples of North America articles
1696:
on the whole debacle from the tribal council's newspaper.
1592:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
1487:
first and actually look at stats and, oh, sources too....
118:
Knowledge:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America
1733:
WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America articles
1395:
Knowledge:Article titles#Use commonly recognizable names
1113:
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a
656:, who were previously referred to as the Sarcee, or the
121:
Template:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America
1533:
1312:. Now you want a centralized discussion when you made
1186:
1178:
1174:
1170:
1286:"These should be discussed at a centralized location."
1211:. If you don't like that, try to change the policy. --
1506:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
1399:
Knowledge:Naming conventions (ethnicities and tribes)
502:
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
1723:
C-Class Indigenous peoples of North America articles
1029:"fill in" redlinks on {{Nuu-chah-nulth governments}}
467:
Knowledge:WikiProject Ethnic groups/Article requests
440:
Category:Ethnic groups articles needing reassessment
430:
Category:Ethnic groups articles needing merge action
215:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
96:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
1624:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
1127:. No further edits should be made to this section.
1602:http://www.magma.ca/%7Estonham/nootka/ntk_txt.html
1520:. No further edits should be made to this section.
1181:citing PRIMARYTOPIC, even though that should mean
445:Category:Ethnic groups articles needing attention
435:Category:Ethnic groups articles needing infoboxes
1537:, and are posted here for posterity. Following
1032:articles needing indigenous input/coauthorship
93:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America
1610:This message was posted before February 2018.
1531:The comment(s) below were originally left at
411:of articles within the scope of this project.
8:
917:Meaning of names should be on languages page
124:Indigenous peoples of North America articles
1229:has been ignored by all of you as has what
1580:I have just modified one external link on
1092:There is a move discussion in progress on
425:Category:Unassessed Ethnic groups articles
371:
286:
155:
58:
1473:was viewed 2,587 times this month (March)
1189:with no regard to PRIMARYTOPIC or UNDAB.
533:Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment
1753:Mid-importance British Columbia articles
1140:and should be at the base name. Though
531:Above undated message substituted from
288:
157:
60:
30:
1743:Mid-importance Canada-related articles
1768:Low-importance Ethnic groups articles
375:WikiProject Ethnic groups open tasks:
7:
1132:The result of the move request was:
318:This article is within the scope of
209:This article is within the scope of
90:This article is within the scope of
1269:be at "X", "Xs", or "X people". —
961:Have a look at the german version.
925:, where it belongs. I just created
338:Knowledge:WikiProject Ethnic groups
115:Indigenous peoples of North America
106:indigenous peoples of North America
70:Indigenous peoples of North America
49:It is of interest to the following
1773:WikiProject Ethnic groups articles
1403:Knowledge:Article titles#Precision
516:
512:
341:Template:WikiProject Ethnic groups
25:
1748:C-Class British Columbia articles
1584:. Please take a moment to review
1539:several discussions in past years
1322:especially yourself as its author
999:Nuu-chah-nulth wiki "to do" list
519:. Further details are available
506:
381:
311:
290:
196:
186:
159:
83:
62:
31:
1738:C-Class Canada-related articles
869:because it was pointedly absent
358:This article has been rated as
249:This article has been rated as
138:This article has been rated as
1763:C-Class Ethnic groups articles
991:18:59, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
977:11:17, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
1:
927:Nuu-chah-nulth Tribal Council
912:10:04, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
867:it, only that I'd created it
861:because there wasn't anything
821:10:04, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
801:08:21, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
776:08:22, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
714:10:17, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
332:and see a list of open tasks.
271:This article is supported by
223:and see a list of open tasks.
112:and see a list of open tasks.
1758:All WikiProject Canada pages
1678:08:40, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
1534:Talk:Nuu-chah-nulth/Comments
1465:which is demonstrably bunk:
934:23:32, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
545:05:30, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
274:WikiProject British Columbia
229:Knowledge:WikiProject Canada
102:Indigenous peoples in Canada
1547:Needs thorough expansion --
1327:but never held one yourself
1088:Move discussion in progress
232:Template:WikiProject Canada
1789:
1709:06:21, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
1641:(last update: 5 June 2024)
1577:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
1497:16:24, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
1460:15:13, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
1441:17:32, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
1415:03:22, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
1384:02:37, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
1357:14:31, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
1339:12:47, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
1279:12:26, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
1252:09:31, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
1221:09:13, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
1199:05:42, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
1101:09:14, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
727:I've moved this page from
559:Well, there is a page for
364:project's importance scale
255:project's importance scale
144:project's importance scale
18:Talk:Nuu-chah-nulth people
1560:22:04, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
1546:
1477:"Nuu-chah-nulth language"
1177:to current article title
1157:13:32, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
1046:Pacific Rim National Park
956:08:32, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
893:18:25, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
884:18:25, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
848:17:34, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
669:19:45, Feb 21, 2005 (UTC)
388:WikiProject Ethnic groups
370:
357:
321:WikiProject Ethnic groups
306:
270:
248:
181:
137:
78:
57:
1513:Please do not modify it.
1120:Please do not modify it.
807:Maquinna, Mowachaht, etc
762:07:37, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
742:01:59, 5 Mar 2005 (UTC)
588:19:20, 29 Dec 2004 (UTC)
1683:Genetic research issues
1573:External links modified
1471:"Nuu-chah-nulth people"
1314:no such effort yourself
923:Nuu-chah-nulth language
235:Canada-related articles
1187:June 8, 2011 by JorisV
1025:Nuu-chah-nulth warfare
700:Nootka Sound", one of
696:vs Yuculta/Euclataws.
344:Ethnic groups articles
267:
39:This article is rated
1689:Dr. Richard Hugh Ward
1163:Nuu-chah-nulth people
1094:Talk:Chipewyan people
523:. Student editor(s):
266:
1622:regular verification
1479:was viewed 867 times
1020:Nuu-chah-nulth music
782:History? Population?
551:Renaming the article
1612:After February 2018
1407:CambridgeBayWeather
902:Chinook Jargon Refs
480:discuss these tasks
386:Here are some open
1666:InternetArchiveBot
1617:InternetArchiveBot
1527:Assessment comment
1431:support the move.
1397:and the guideline
1393:as per the policy
1175:redirected by same
1015:Nuu-chah-nulth art
521:on the course page
463:Start an article:
268:
212:WikiProject Canada
45:content assessment
1694:Here's an article
1642:
1567:
1566:
1154:
979:
967:comment added by
839:, but not openly
499:
498:
495:
494:
491:
490:
487:
486:
285:
284:
281:
280:
154:
153:
150:
149:
16:(Redirected from
1780:
1676:
1667:
1640:
1639:
1618:
1544:
1543:
1536:
1515:
1376:
1152:
1122:
1036:Hot Springs Cove
962:
547:
518:
517:13 December 2018
514:
513:6 September 2018
510:
409:on the talk page
406:
400:
385:
372:
346:
345:
342:
339:
336:
315:
308:
307:
302:
294:
287:
237:
236:
233:
230:
227:
206:
201:
200:
199:
190:
183:
182:
177:
174:
172:British Columbia
163:
156:
126:
125:
122:
119:
116:
98:Native Americans
87:
80:
79:
74:
66:
59:
42:
36:
35:
27:
21:
1788:
1787:
1783:
1782:
1781:
1779:
1778:
1777:
1713:
1712:
1685:
1670:
1665:
1633:
1626:have permission
1616:
1590:this simple FaQ
1575:
1532:
1529:
1524:
1511:
1370:
1320:on this issue,
1179:on the same day
1138:WP:PRIMARYTOPIC
1118:
1108:
1090:
1061:Clayoquot Sound
1001:
941:
939:What about now?
919:
904:
809:
784:
748:
725:
694:Laich-kwil-tach
553:
530:
504:
456:Peruvian people
404:
398:
343:
340:
337:
334:
333:
300:
234:
231:
228:
225:
224:
202:
197:
195:
175:
169:
123:
120:
117:
114:
113:
72:
43:on Knowledge's
40:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
1786:
1784:
1776:
1775:
1770:
1765:
1760:
1755:
1750:
1745:
1740:
1735:
1730:
1725:
1715:
1714:
1684:
1681:
1660:
1659:
1652:
1605:
1604:
1596:Added archive
1582:Nuu-chah-nulth
1574:
1571:
1565:
1564:
1563:
1562:
1528:
1525:
1523:
1522:
1508:requested move
1503:
1502:
1501:
1500:
1499:
1484:
1483:
1482:
1481:
1480:
1474:
1444:
1443:
1417:
1401:. The section
1387:
1386:
1362:
1361:
1360:
1359:
1342:
1341:
1282:
1281:
1265:
1264:
1257:
1256:
1255:
1254:
1235:WP:ETHNICGROUP
1183:Nuu-chah-nulth
1167:Nuu-chah-nulth
1160:
1130:
1129:
1115:requested move
1109:
1107:
1106:Requested move
1104:
1089:
1086:
1085:
1084:
1081:
1080:
1079:
1073:
1068:
1066:Quatsino Sound
1063:
1058:
1053:
1048:
1043:
1041:Walbran Valley
1038:
1030:
1027:
1022:
1017:
1012:
1007:
1000:
997:
996:
995:
994:
993:
940:
937:
918:
915:
903:
900:
856:
855:
808:
805:
793:MadelaineNabbe
783:
780:
768:MadelaineNabbe
747:
744:
733:Nuu-chah-nulth
724:
721:
677:
676:
675:
674:
673:
672:
671:
670:
642:
641:
640:
639:
638:
637:
625:
624:
623:
622:
609:
608:
607:
606:
600:
599:
598:
597:
590:
589:
581:
580:
575:
574:
565:
564:
561:Nuu-Chah-Nulth
552:
549:
525:MadelaineNabbe
503:
500:
497:
496:
493:
492:
489:
488:
485:
484:
476:edit this list
472:
471:
470:
469:
461:
460:
459:
452:
447:
442:
437:
432:
427:
419:
418:
417:
412:
377:
376:
368:
367:
360:Low-importance
356:
350:
349:
347:
330:the discussion
316:
304:
303:
301:Low‑importance
295:
283:
282:
279:
278:
269:
259:
258:
251:Mid-importance
247:
241:
240:
238:
221:the discussion
208:
207:
191:
179:
178:
176:Mid‑importance
164:
152:
151:
148:
147:
140:Low-importance
136:
130:
129:
127:
110:the discussion
104:, and related
88:
76:
75:
73:Low‑importance
67:
55:
54:
48:
37:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1785:
1774:
1771:
1769:
1766:
1764:
1761:
1759:
1756:
1754:
1751:
1749:
1746:
1744:
1741:
1739:
1736:
1734:
1731:
1729:
1726:
1724:
1721:
1720:
1718:
1711:
1710:
1706:
1702:
1697:
1695:
1690:
1682:
1680:
1679:
1674:
1669:
1668:
1657:
1653:
1650:
1646:
1645:
1644:
1637:
1631:
1627:
1623:
1619:
1613:
1608:
1603:
1599:
1595:
1594:
1593:
1591:
1587:
1583:
1578:
1572:
1570:
1561:
1558:
1553:
1552:
1551:(8 May 2006)
1550:
1545:
1542:
1540:
1535:
1526:
1521:
1519:
1514:
1509:
1504:
1498:
1494:
1490:
1485:
1478:
1475:
1472:
1469:
1468:
1467:
1466:
1463:
1462:
1461:
1457:
1453:
1448:
1447:
1446:
1445:
1442:
1438:
1434:
1430:
1426:
1421:
1418:
1416:
1412:
1408:
1404:
1400:
1396:
1392:
1389:
1388:
1385:
1382:
1381:
1377:
1375:
1374:
1367:
1364:
1363:
1358:
1354:
1350:
1346:
1345:
1344:
1343:
1340:
1336:
1332:
1328:
1323:
1319:
1315:
1311:
1307:
1306:Slavey people
1302:
1297:
1292:
1287:
1284:
1283:
1280:
1276:
1272:
1267:
1266:
1262:
1259:
1258:
1253:
1249:
1245:
1240:
1236:
1232:
1228:
1224:
1223:
1222:
1218:
1214:
1210:
1206:
1203:
1202:
1201:
1200:
1196:
1192:
1188:
1184:
1180:
1176:
1172:
1169:– target was
1168:
1164:
1159:
1158:
1155:
1149:
1147:
1143:
1139:
1135:
1128:
1126:
1121:
1116:
1111:
1110:
1105:
1103:
1102:
1099:
1095:
1087:
1082:
1077:
1074:
1072:
1071:Kyuquot Sound
1069:
1067:
1064:
1062:
1059:
1057:
1056:Barkley Sound
1054:
1052:
1049:
1047:
1044:
1042:
1039:
1037:
1034:
1033:
1031:
1028:
1026:
1023:
1021:
1018:
1016:
1013:
1011:
1008:
1006:
1003:
1002:
998:
992:
989:
985:
981:
980:
978:
974:
970:
969:91.16.114.239
966:
960:
959:
958:
957:
954:
950:
946:
938:
936:
935:
932:
928:
924:
916:
914:
913:
910:
901:
899:
895:
894:
891:
886:
885:
882:
878:
874:
870:
866:
862:
852:
851:
850:
849:
846:
842:
838:
833:
827:
823:
822:
819:
815:
806:
804:
802:
798:
794:
788:
781:
779:
777:
773:
769:
764:
763:
760:
756:
752:
745:
743:
741:
738:
734:
730:
722:
720:
716:
715:
712:
706:
703:
697:
695:
691:
687:
683:
668:
663:
659:
655:
650:
649:
648:
647:
646:
645:
644:
643:
636:
635:BeavisSanchez
631:
630:
629:
628:
627:
626:
621:
620:BeavisSanchez
617:
616:
615:
614:
613:
604:
603:
602:
601:
594:
593:
592:
591:
587:
583:
582:
577:
576:
572:
567:
566:
562:
558:
557:
556:
550:
548:
546:
542:
538:
534:
528:
526:
522:
509:
501:
483:
481:
477:
474:Feel free to
468:
465:
464:
462:
458:
457:
453:
451:
448:
446:
443:
441:
438:
436:
433:
431:
428:
426:
423:
422:
420:
416:
413:
410:
403:
402:Ethnic groups
396:
395:
393:
392:
391:
389:
384:
379:
378:
374:
373:
369:
365:
361:
355:
352:
351:
348:
335:Ethnic groups
331:
327:
326:ethnic groups
323:
322:
317:
314:
310:
309:
305:
299:
298:Ethnic groups
296:
293:
289:
276:
275:
265:
261:
260:
256:
252:
246:
243:
242:
239:
222:
218:
214:
213:
205:
204:Canada portal
194:
192:
189:
185:
184:
180:
173:
168:
165:
162:
158:
145:
141:
135:
132:
131:
128:
111:
107:
103:
99:
95:
94:
89:
86:
82:
81:
77:
71:
68:
65:
61:
56:
52:
46:
38:
34:
29:
28:
19:
1698:
1686:
1664:
1661:
1636:source check
1615:
1609:
1606:
1579:
1576:
1568:
1530:
1512:
1505:
1419:
1390:
1379:
1372:
1371:
1365:
1326:
1325:discussion,
1321:
1318:WP:OWNership
1313:
1309:
1300:
1295:
1290:
1285:
1260:
1204:
1161:
1133:
1131:
1119:
1112:
1091:
1076:Nootka Sound
1005:Wickaninnish
988:OldManRivers
942:
920:
905:
896:
887:
876:
872:
868:
864:
860:
857:
840:
836:
831:
828:
824:
814:Nootka Sound
810:
789:
785:
765:
749:
726:
717:
707:
701:
698:
682:St'at'imcets
678:
662:Nootka Sound
652:include the
610:
570:
554:
529:
505:
473:
454:
408:
394:Meta-tasks:
380:
359:
319:
272:
250:
210:
139:
91:
51:WikiProjects
1518:move review
1429:conciseness
1296:mandatorily
1231:WP:CRITERIA
1125:move review
1051:John Jewitt
984:Shawn Atleo
963:—Preceding
841:discredited
737:violet/riga
1717:Categories
1673:Report bug
1310:still lost
1146:CĂşchullain
837:discounted
746:References
723:Page moved
654:Tsuu T'ina
571:Chicoutimi
397:Place the
1656:this tool
1649:this tool
1425:precision
945:Joe David
688:(sp?) vs
686:Sneneymux
579:listener.
407:template
1662:Cheers.—
1557:Miskwito
1549:Skookum1
1489:Skookum1
1331:Skookum1
1244:Skookum1
1227:WP:UNDAB
1191:Skookum1
1098:RMCD bot
1010:Callicum
965:unsigned
931:Skookum1
909:Skookum1
890:Skookum1
881:Skookum1
865:finished
845:Skookum1
818:Skookum1
711:Skookum1
667:Kurieeto
586:Geo Swan
537:PrimeBOT
1701:Deddish
1586:my edit
1452:JorisvS
1420:Support
1391:Support
1366:Support
1213:JorisvS
1173:, then
690:Nanaimo
390:tasks:
362:on the
253:on the
142:on the
41:C-class
1373:bd2412
1261:Oppose
1209:WP:NCL
1205:Oppose
1142:WP:NCL
949:Jmabel
877:needed
729:Nootka
226:Canada
217:Canada
167:Canada
47:scale.
1433:Xoloz
1349:kwami
1271:kwami
1239:cabal
1134:Move.
832:"the"
658:Inuit
1705:talk
1493:talk
1456:talk
1437:talk
1427:and
1411:talk
1353:talk
1335:talk
1301:"we"
1275:talk
1248:talk
1233:and
1217:talk
1195:talk
973:talk
953:Talk
797:talk
772:talk
759:Lupo
753:and
692:and
596:odd.
541:talk
515:and
450:Iyer
1630:RfC
1600:to
1510:.
1078:etc
740:(t)
731:to
702:the
535:by
478:or
354:Low
245:Mid
134:Low
1719::
1707:)
1643:.
1638:}}
1634:{{
1555:--
1495:)
1458:)
1439:)
1413:)
1355:)
1337:)
1277:)
1250:)
1219:)
1197:)
1165:→
1117:.
975:)
951:|
816:.
803:)
799:)
778:)
774:)
757:.
755:no
735:.
543:)
527:.
482:.
405:}}
399:{{
170::
100:,
1703:(
1675:)
1671:(
1658:.
1651:.
1491:(
1454:(
1435:(
1409:(
1380:T
1351:(
1333:(
1329:.
1273:(
1246:(
1215:(
1193:(
1153:c
1150:/
971:(
795:(
791:(
770:(
539:(
366:.
277:.
257:.
146:.
53::
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
