199:
New York Times or the Wall Street
Journal or the London Telegraph or the Economist because I find them more credible than Joe Six Pack Blogger! There is a lot of anti-american/communist opinion expressed and implied in supposedly "neutral" wikipedia articles. For example the tv license article implies that somehow the government at one time attempted to have a tv license -- which would be a PATENT violation of the 4th amendment -- but decided not to because the quality of commercial TV had been demonstrated. Complete nonsense! The first radio stations in the USA were completely unregulated and completely private enterprises. The american equivilent of OFCOM was not created for another 30 years. Whereas in England, it was apparently illegal to broadcast unless you were the BBC. It was a totally different process, and Americans in any case would certainly NEVER stand for TV licenses. We proved that in 1776. You might as well have Pencil Licenses, and a British Writing Corporation, to "preserve the quality of works created with pencils". The British Writing Corporation, of course, would have the authority to charge money for the right to own pencils, and to inspect your home to determine if you have any unlicensed pencils. (see www.centreforcitizenship.org.uk if you think no brits agree with me on that) My point here is, to suggest that this guy Old Right should be banned from wikipedia in an attempt to create "credibility" is complete nonsense. Either ANYBODY can edit an article, or they can't. If they can't, that seems to defeat the purpose of having a wikipedia. Again, if I want something edited, with reliable information, I will go to Encyclopedia Britannica. If I want unedited information on esoteric subjects like Star Trek and Lord of the Rings, I will use Knowledge. But Knowledge will never be credible to the extent that Encyclopedia Britannica is, because the University of Chicago, the world renown university which currently owns Britannica, is fundamentally more credible than the people who post to wikipedia, including myself. --Brian, former usn submariner
1147:
capacity as a crown officer, can ask for a nuclear strike. However the Prime
Minister, unlike the President of the US, is not a commissioned officer in HM Forces and therefore cannot order any serving member of the armed forces to do anything and require them to obey. Instead, s\he will ask the Chief of the Defence Staff (who is a commisioned officer) to order the launch. This, in theory, provides a safeguard against a particularly despotic Prime Minister "going rogue" and ordering a nuclear strike on their own. In practice, however, it is unlikely this distinction would be observed - especially in a crisis situation likely to require nuclear retaliation. Further complications arise due to submarine based Trident weapons and the envelopes on-board. This whole topic is explored in much more detail in the book "The Secret State - Britain and the Cold War" by Professor Peter Hennessy. -
323:
Reading his web site, I see nothing that indicates that he is directly connected to
President Carter or President Reagan, the White House staff, US military command, or any other primary sources. There is no chain of evidence that leads to any other source, primary or otherwise. In my editorial judgment, this citation is not acceptable by Knowledge's standards. Can anyone find a better reference? If not, I am inclined to remove this sentence and reference, because for all we know this information is completely made up.
31:
437:, plain and simple. The author has likely made up these "accounts" out of thin air to facilitate his/her writing. In reality, these "accounts" likely don't exist. And, if they do, the author likely has no idea as to whom they may be attributed. If this weren't the case, then the author would speficy to what s/he is referring when writing "some accounts." This kind of slick writing is also evil in the Wiki World!
1102:
sovreign power to a monarch ("Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed" says the
Declaration), how does the launching of nuclear weapons work in Britain? I assume the PM is the one who would give the order, not the Queen? Does Blair have a "nuclear football"? --Brian, former US Navy submariner
458:" Who exactly is "presuming" that the antenna has this function? "Presumably," it could be for a number of things. The problem here is the same as in the last point. The author has made a guess, that's all. And guesses are anathema to Knowledge! So verify the info before putting it in the article as patent speculation.
1349:
states that there is actually a long hierarchy of other people that succeed the
Secretary of Defense in cases like this. Also, as an aside of some original research, I would presume that if the SecDef position is vacant in the National Command Authority (presume EVERYONE dies in the succession), the
1228:
It's really quite simple. PM orders CoDS to launch nuclear strike and he directs communication to our SSBNs and the 'bombers' come to missile depth and do their duty. In case of a surprise strike, our SSBNs do not pick up the daily radio broadcasts they expect to they come to missile depth. And the
944:
I understand that pictures of the real thing would be totally classified, but why is it so? Even if terrorists or whatever found out what the football really looked like, they wouldn't be able to fight through a ton of marines and secret service agents to get to it. And even then they would need the
198:
reply to the above paragraph: I'm not "Old Right", but lmao you can't say wikipedia is "anyone can edit wikipedia" and then turn around and say "but this person is banned". You shouldn't try to give wikipedia credibility; credibility is why we pay for
Encyclopedias and Newspapers! lmao I pay for The
1538:
Hi, it appears that the "football" also contains sensors that detect if the GPS/GNSS systems go down or get seriously out of sync as this would be likely in the event of a first strike involving nuclear weapons detonated in space. It also senses radio timing signals, so that in the event of some or
1316:
1: The
Secretary of Defense could refuse to comply with the order. He would be fired, and charged with treason 2: His deputy would then be given the order. The deputy could then also refuse to comply with the order. 3: If the deputy Secretary of Defense refused to comply with the order as well, it
1101:
Guys, here's a question for you, elsewhere in wikipedia it says that the Queen of
England is the Commander in Chief of the british military. Putting aside the fact that we Patriots of the United States find it astonishing to see The People of any modern first world nation willing to sacrifice their
981:
The quotation from Gulley says the football contains 4 things, and lists them - they are all printed material of some sort. Then the section "Operation" says "Next, using whatever communications technology the satchel has ...", with, unfortunately, "citation needed". Is there any more information
487:
Between the lack of sourcing and the rampant, speculative original research, this article is in very poor shape. And the style of writing is unacceptable, given the weasel words run amuck. Someone who's invested in this entry should fix it up before an admin comes across it and takes bolder action.
476:
And I didn't mentioned all of the un-cited facts. The entire description of the contents of the nuclear football is uncited. And, since the author claims that this information is "highly classified," how can we trust that s/he really knows its contents and isn't simply speculating? For this reason,
322:
His article "Secrets of the
Nuclear Football" cited here is described as having been published in something called "The Scoogie Spin", though the web site is defunct and I can't figure out what kind of publication this is. So this leaves me trying to assess Bodek himself as an authoritative source.
1005:
article states that:"The designee is provided presidential-level security and transport for the duration of the event. An aide carries the nuclear football with them. However, they are not given a briefing on what to do in the event that the other successors to the presidency are killed". So, does
503:
I certainly appreciate your take-charge attitude on the matter, but you may have gone a little overboard. A template or two and a few tags could have done the job where the page is now nearly unreadable. Seven cleanup templates and a tag (or two!) after nearly every statement? I realize that this
202:
To unsigned complainer, can we see YOUR history please? I looked for Old Right in the page history and his last edit was an addition of extra information on who has "dropped the ball" before. He may have partisan opinions but, in that case at least, I think he acted on those opinions to REDUCE the
176:
Why would
President George H. W. Bush losing the briefcase be most recently? Bill Clinton was President after Bush, so I can't see how the article could possibly be accurate as is. Maybe the original author confused George H. W. Bush (41st President) with George W. Bush (current, 43rd President).
1394:
historic, partially because it is a social media photograph of the aide carrying the nuclear football, but mostly because this is the first time (to the best of my knowledge) any of the aides have posed for a photograph while on duty, ever. Even the military has admitted that the situation was a
1289:
I don't understand why? They are related but as much as a cockpit and a fighter jet. There is so much material about both alone (and not just duplication) that I think separate articles are very much deserved. The terms are also commonly used separately, with nuclear football being somewhat of a
338:
I just did a little more reading about WP policies regarding acceptable sources of information. So, while I understand my talking about "primary" sources is faulty (should have been "neutral third party with a reputation for fact checking", etc.) I still think there is something fishy about this
871:
it discusses how "Military officers, including the one who carried the nuclear football, unsuccessfully tried to prevent FBI agents from confiscating the suit, Reagan's wallet, and other possessions as evidence; the Gold Codes card was in the wallet, and the FBI did not return it until two days
217:
Is there any truth in the story that the football, along with the president's copy of the launch codes, was not present on Nixon's last flight in Air Force One prior to his resignation to eliminate the possibility of him staging a nuclear coup? I've herd this a couple of times but haven't found
1146:
Ah, now this is a very interesting question, especially having in mind a curious concept in the 'unwritten' constitution of the UK, that of the Crown and royal prerogative - through which ministers including the Prime Minister derive their executive authority. The Prime Minister, acting in his
1605:
The article you link describes a test. My guess would be that destruct facilities are only present for tests or, perhaps, are present on all missiles but are only enabled for test launches. That's only a guess though. I would also guess that destruct options are purposefully not available for
451:" "Possibly bullet-resistant"? Are we guessing that here? What a ridiculous thing to write. The football could possibly double as a coffee maker too. Possiblies don't belong in the article. Verify the info before putting it in the article. Merely adding the word "possibly" doesn't make it OK.
840:
I believe "Dropkick" referred to as how the briefcase came to be known as the "football" was the faux operation referred to by George C. Scott's character, General Buck Turgidson in Stanley Kubrick's film classic "Dr. Strangelove or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb.
1415:
45 pounds (20 kg) seems very heavy, even if it is reinforced (with lead?). That's the maximum weight for a suitcase on some airlines. I wouldn't like to have to carry that around one-handed for long, especially while jogging with the President. Can anyone shed more light on this?
483:
citations. We can't just trust that the author did't make up the whole "Contents" section based on watching a few movies. Frankly, that may very well be the case. If the article were sourced, on the other hand, there would be no question as to the veracity of the information.
195:(you really should check out his history) has vandalized this page, adding or removing information with the intent to lean the article towards a POV. If you see any of his activity in the article history, or any other articles for this matter, please review it.
1290:
colloquial term. Nuclear codes or gold codes as our article terms them are the most commonly referred term and the concept is very much deserving of its own article. If anything nuclear football should be merged there, however I don't think it should be done.
313:
In the Highlights section, the following sentence appears: "During their presidencies, Jimmy Carter always carried the launch codes in his jacket, while Ronald Reagan preferred to keep the launch codes in his wallet." The source cited for this statement is:
1439:
I was thinking the same thing. The documents Bill describes can't weigh that much; any modern communications gear would only weigh at most a few more pounds. Maybe the bag contains Kevlar and plating that could be used to protect the comms and the carrier.
1320:
So, the crucial figure is the secretary of defense, and his deputy. Which is why they're always very experienced military figures. They can actually refuse the order, and set off a series of events that could get the president removed/impeached
401:
This article is full of speculation, original research and weasel words. It also lacks citations for important facts. I tagged it up fairly heavily because the wiki policy violations are so eggregious. Here are just a few of the issues with the
1584:
The video claims that there is no recall mechanisms for a launched ICBM without any sources. This seems to indicate that there are, indeed, ways to terminate a launched Minuteman III (the only type of land-based ICBM in the USA's arsenal):
917:
Hope someone can at least find some citeable sources from those links! Also, the question of it ever being used to launch nukes... it was developed in the cold war, so obviously there are no reported cases of it being used to launch nukes.
912:
It's just a leather satchel. It shows the leather strap to connect it to the carriers wrist. This is probably what the un-sourced things from the article are based on. It is also possible that some of the information came from this show
504:
page needs serious help, but in the meantime, it looks like a train wreck now. I'm not sure how (if at all) any facts can be verified on something so classified, so I agree with you there, but... take it easy on the layout next time! :)
1039:
and possible now that everyone in the Line of Succession had there own Football in case that they found there self in the time sensitive situation (30 min for and ICBM to hit or Six min if SLBM) and had to chose and issue a retaliatory
687:
Wasn't there something on here about how George W. Bush after 9/11 used the Football to review posssible evacuation plans? Also, if it was ever actually used to launch nukes, I don't think something like that would be kept secret for
410:
Are the contents of the nuclear football classified? If they are, then how can you write about its contents without wildly speculating? Furthermore, why doesn't someone verify that the contents are or are not classified instead of
82:
page since this briefcase is more commonly referred to as the Football rather than the Nuclear Football. Just thought that those of you who follow this topic might be interested if you have any comments concerning this matter.
677:
Since it was designed while Kennedy was in office, and the only time nuclear weapons have ever been used (besides tests) was in 1945... I'm guessing not. Of course it could have other non-nuclear functions, we don't know.
760:-I agree, the article mentions a strap around the wrist of teh officer (the picture doesn't show it) and that the officer is always armed (ths officer isn't armed). Maybe more research is needed in these areas.
232:
The article's getting a bit swamped with all the fictional references - perhaps it could be trimmed down to a few lines to indicate that it's a widely used ploty theme? What are other peoples thoughts on this?
203:
bias in the article. I'm not American and its clear to me as a neutral outsider that someone has edited this article with the intention of portraying Bill Clinton as more of a clown than his IQ would suggest.
872:
later." One of these articles is has min-information, though it may be due to the lack of a source in this article. Does anyone have any further insight? Should we change the article to read similarly to the
293:
It says right in the section that the contents of the Football are highly classified. However, the section then goes on to make assumptions about what it contains. That sounds like patent speculation to me.
1395:
strange one. And it reflects on the Trump presidency, given the social milieu which enabled some rich guy to have the photo taken, security bubble and all. All told, certainly notable enough for inclusion.
1028:
in the event that the others in the line of Succession that fall before him or her are dead or out of contact. His or Her identity would need to be confirmed by the Secretary of Defense or one of his
444:" "A logical assumption"?! Logic does not replace a valid source. In any event, what one finds logical, others may find crazy. Your logical assumption is meaningless here. It's just original research.
1697:
1354:
to declare someone as acting SecDef, which could hypothetically even be himself, thereby ensuring with certainty his orders will be made in a lawful manner. Grognard Extraordinaire
1317:
would go to a vote within the cabinet. The cabinet could then vote against the military strike, which in essence, is a vote of no confidence in the commander-in-chief's sanity.
1661:
Various sources reported that 36 Congressmembers called on Biden to give up his access to the nuclear football back in February 2021. Shouldn't that be covered in the article?
465:" Who says this is a common misconception? Again, this is original research. The only one with this misconception is the person who wrote that sentence. Verify it or delete it.
1516:
Well there would be no way to prove that suitcase nukes exist. One would have to blow up first, and even then there would be official denials and censorship of reporting. -
1701:
114:
I don't think Duane from ABC Liquors can pick up the satcom and say, "Yeah, dude. Code x5793. Glass parking lot! Whoaahh!!" simply because he found the football. Relax.
422:" Is that popular belief? If so, it's news to me. Who's the one making the determination that this is popular belief? It sounds like original research writing to me.
1128:
I believe launch authority rests with the PM, though I don't have anything offhand to say so. ("War Plan UK" probably would, but it's a few hundred miles away...)
1460:
What is it called when a satchel is stuffed with an actual small nuclear bomb, as a non-survivable deterrent defense weapon, and not stuffed with launch codes? -
788:
I am just trying to work out why the article says it is a Zero Halliburton case when both the earlier link and the main photo to his profile show it is not.
1565:
The above discussion from almost 16 years ago was never really resolved, and the answer isn't in the article. Does anybody know why it's called a football?
143:
The first place I can think of that I'd ever heard the use of the term 'football' ascribed to the presidential nuclear death satchel would be in the movie
727:
Saying the nuclear football "cannot fall into the wrong hands" seems inappropriate, or at the very least inappropriately worded, for a wikipedia article.
818:
607:
548:
929:
381:
Sure, if you can find a website or something that has more info on the USSR's (now Russia's) football, knock yourself out. I'm certainly interested.
908:
I don't know if these images are allowed to be used, but they are pictures of something in the Smithsonian(which is allowed for public use).
603:
544:
1546:
1351:
781:
The officer is armed on his left side. You could not have the fun on your right side if you are holding the football. Also in this article
767:
273:
I agree with you. If you want to trim down things in the article to stuff that is from fiction or based on speculation more power to you.
248:
I think the pop culture references should stay as-is. At least until I or someone else has the heart to do a full fledged article on that
689:
382:
295:
274:
259:
1487:
1425:
1236:
1215:
1066:
1029:
848:
803:
789:
366:
1295:
892:
543:
Should this be mentioned in popular culture? It seems that wasn't actually the Nuclear Football, but instead something similar.
987:
192:
914:
1025:
1313:
This is stated in the article, but not entirely true. There are, in theory ways a president's cabinet could stop the order:
873:
868:
1291:
442:
This is a logical assumption since, by the Federal Communication Commission's own official description, the EAS is...
602:
The first sort of makes sense. I'm altering it and putting it back. The second was definitely put there by a troll.
1483:
751:
38:
1498:. They could be lifted (but not usefully carried) by one person and were intended to be emplaced by a small team.
1011:
949:
591:
983:
1550:
771:
896:
299:
278:
1445:
1380:
1240:
1045:
807:
793:
693:
420:
Contrary to popular belief, the Football does not contain the daily revisions of the nuclear launch codes...
386:
263:
1148:
747:
1503:
1429:
1219:
1070:
852:
732:
626:
370:
1586:
1175:
1103:
679:
344:
328:
47:
17:
1074:
1006:
that mean that there are two footballs? Or is the football not with the President during these events?
909:
782:
1618:
1542:
1256:
1232:
1163:
1117:
1086:
1062:
1059:
Since all this is so incredibly classified, how can we reliably know any of what is in this article?
1007:
962:
946:
888:
884:
880:
844:
799:
763:
728:
708:
653:
632:
579:
362:
255:
238:
130:
1340:
1324:
1591:
1400:
1346:
1328:
1021:
1002:
509:
1696:
The President has sole aurhority and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs has no command role. Idiots
178:
104:
I think it's because it's the most popular name devised for it -- it officially doesn't have one.
1595:
1441:
1417:
1376:
1133:
1041:
529:
127:
108:
1332:
957:
Perhaps the worry is that someone will steal it to try to prevent or delay a nuclear attack? --
1499:
1279:
622:
566:
219:
144:
1681:
1666:
1611:
1570:
1521:
1465:
1421:
1193:
826:
493:
403:
340:
324:
204:
151:
107:
And why the hell is the fate of the nation's nuclear arsenal entrusted to a suitcase?!?!?!?
1183:
Gotta agree there. In case you haven't noticed, no-one cares about US patriots in Britain.
915:
http://www.thehistorychannel.co.uk/site/tv_guide/full_details/Technology/programme_2236.php
359:
USSR premiers and Russian presidents also have "footballs". This should be also reflected.
1615:
1607:
1358:
1252:
1159:
1113:
1082:
958:
703:
648:
234:
1599:
1214:, this article doesn't mention any "nuclear briefcases" other than the US one though. --
1705:
1685:
1670:
1628:
1574:
1554:
1525:
1507:
1469:
1449:
1433:
1404:
1396:
1384:
1362:
1299:
1283:
1260:
1244:
1223:
1196:
1187:
1178:
1167:
1151:
1137:
1121:
1106:
1090:
1049:
1015:
991:
966:
952:
939:
922:
919:
856:
830:
811:
775:
755:
736:
712:
697:
682:
671:
657:
636:
611:
595:
571:
552:
533:
513:
505:
497:
390:
374:
348:
332:
303:
282:
267:
242:
222:
207:
181:
166:
159:
155:
133:
87:
449:
The case itself is a metallic, possibly bullet-resistant, modified Zero Halliburton...
1476:
1129:
937:
587:
525:
427:
Some accounts assert that the case contains equipment and protocols for activating...
115:
84:
75:
1275:
163:
1677:
1662:
1566:
1517:
1461:
1309:
Secretary of Defense does not have to comply with the Commander in Chief's order
1001:
This article states the President is accompanied with the Football, however the
822:
647:
Is there anything known about an Israeli equivalent of the "nuclear football"?--
489:
434:
315:
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
1211:
524:
The section currently named highlights should be changed to Interesting facts?
463:
Another common misconception is that the Football is handcuffed to its carrier.
1355:
1268:
982:
about this 5th thing in the satchel? I imagine it's not just a cell phone. --
147:. Having never read the book, I cannot say if the book used the term as well.
945:
launch codes, and probably the presidents fingerprint. Lame, totally lame. --
318:
The author appears to be a man named Martin Bodek. I found his home page at:
1475:
Fictionally, "nuclear briefcase" has been popular, which Knowledge terms a "
1184:
668:
1539:
all going down at once this is recorded and presented on internal screen.
1112:
You aren't a former US Navy submariner or you won't be asking this question
177:
However, I don't really have any sources to confirm this, just intuition.
1036:
932:
583:
154:
pilot episode yankee white. It is also featured prominantly in the novel
98:
79:
1479:", although no real evidence for their existence has ever been shown.
910:
http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/systems/nuclear-football-pics.htm
783:
http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/systems/nuclear-football-pics.htm
1174:
Brian - I find the way you worded your question highly offensive.
746:
How do we know that's "the football" and not a regular briefcase?
1610:. Putting any of that in the article would need compliance with
1495:
1491:
397:
Original research, weasel words, no citations = pure speculation
1646:
456:
A small antenna, presumably for the SATCOM radio, protruding...
785:
it is mentioned that the football is not attached to the arm.
667:
Has this thing ever been used? Or are we not allowed to know?
319:
25:
415:
that they are? In the Knowledge world, assumptions are evil!
931:
reeeeal nice like, they might be willing to give us one :)
928:
I'd be willing to bet that if someone asked the smithsonian
129:, especially the part on the beginnings of "the Football".
1676:
Discussion? If nobody appears to respond, I'll put it in.
1035:
It is logical to assume or at least think that during the
78:
on whether a disambiguation statement is warranted on the
1606:
operational launches because of concern over their being
473:
section. I haven't even gone through the other ones.
1486:" in the US, and there were a few different models:
1274:
There is a duplication of information on each page.
562:Why is this at the top, before the article begins:
126:A few sentences were clearly copy and pasted from
1373:Stick to history, not some social media picture.
1345:Not exactly. Disregarding the original research,
1212:http://en.wikipedia.org/Norwegian_Rocket_Incident
1482:Militarily, small tactical weapons were termed "
1647:https://en.wikipedia.org/List_of_ICBMs#Active_2
621:The link to reference 6 (about Bush) is dead.
316:http://members.aol.com/thebodie/football.html
150:It is featured briefly at the begging of the
8:
1540:
819:Knowledge:No original research/Noticeboard
630:
1698:2401:7400:401A:D815:3942:D45F:1869:74DD
1639:
1580:No recall mechanism for launched ICBM's
1081:Since you are alive, why don't you die?
702:The news would hit us like a bomb ;)--
44:Do not edit the contents of this page.
1229:CO opens the letter of last resort.
1192:It looks to me like a friendly jab.--
7:
1352:Federal Vacancies Reform Act of 1998
355:Russian president has a football too
862:
24:
1251:Never heard of CoDS at all. Fail.
1210:This article is also linked from
876:section regarding the football?
97:And why is it called a football?
604:Theusernameiwantedisalreadyinuse
545:Theusernameiwantedisalreadyinuse
429:" "Some accounts"? Who are the "
309:Is this an authoritative source?
29:
1424:) 12:32, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
1097:British PM has a football also?
1706:13:34, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
1188:18:28, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
923:21:10, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
831:21:23, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
672:18:46, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
612:10:23, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
596:15:09, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
172:Factual Mistake in the Article
76:Talk:Football#Nuclear_Football
1:
1405:00:17, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
1385:06:10, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
1350:President could just use the
1179:03:04, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
1054:
940:10:49, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
796:) 09:18, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
776:14:07, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
553:20:13, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
514:08:19, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
498:19:41, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
283:03:33, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
1629:12:15, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
1600:18:55, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
1575:07:19, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
1561:Why is it called a football?
1555:10:23, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
1363:23:48, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
1333:11:43, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
1300:22:36, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
1245:23:47, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
874:Reagan assassination attempt
869:Reagan assassination attempt
863:Reagan's Assignation Attempt
857:19:43, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
756:04:14, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
637:22:49, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
268:01:51, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
243:16:30, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
134:02:02, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
1526:00:39, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
1508:23:48, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
1484:Atomic Demolition Munitions
1470:23:32, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
1284:19:22, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
1261:15:20, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
1168:09:30, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
1122:09:29, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
1091:09:31, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
1024:who would have then become
897:05:15, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
812:08:38, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
469:These problems are only in
320:http://www.martinbodek.com/
1722:
1434:23:47, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
1075:23:48, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
1055:What I don't understand...
1050:07:28, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
1016:18:36, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
953:05:33, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
713:13:38, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
658:13:35, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
534:00:25, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
304:06:41, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
208:20:44, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
118:20:59, May 10, 2005 (UTC)
74:I started a discussion at
1686:04:14, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
1671:03:24, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
1450:18:42, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
1224:19:24, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
1107:00:25, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
992:21:49, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
737:02:10, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
698:08:04, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
683:18:49, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
391:04:52, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
167:13:17, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
111:18:16, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC)
101:17:35, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC)
1152:16:07, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
1138:22:49, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
1020:Yes there are many. The
977:What is in the football?
967:01:28, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
349:01:51, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
333:16:29, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
223:21:43, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
218:anything to back it up.
182:06:43, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
1197:15:58, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
375:13:59, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
88:07:46, 9 May 2005 (UTC)
1347:|Executive Order 13394
904:Images of the football
139:Pop Culture References
1308:
1158:Another idiotic post.
984:Richardson mcphillips
817:I brought this up at
191:At least twice, user
42:of past discussions.
18:Talk:Nuclear football
1267:Proposed merge with
704:Baruch ben Alexander
649:Baruch ben Alexander
228:Fictional references
1361:Ping when replying
1022:Designated survivor
1003:Designated survivor
617:Dead reference~link
836:Operation Dropkick
539:Metal Gear Solid 2
1627:
1557:
1545:comment added by
1534:Interesting notes
1235:comment added by
1077:
1065:comment added by
900:
883:comment added by
847:comment added by
802:comment added by
766:comment added by
639:
599:
582:comment added by
567:Nuclear briefcase
520:Interesting Facts
377:
365:comment added by
270:
258:comment added by
145:Seven Days in May
67:
66:
54:
53:
48:current talk page
1713:
1649:
1644:
1621:
1344:
1247:
1149:Divinedegenerate
1060:
935:
899:
877:
859:
814:
778:
748:TheoryOfPractice
711:
656:
643:Israeli football
598:
576:
404:Contents section
360:
289:Contents section
253:
250:Chain of Command
187:User "Old Right"
63:
56:
55:
33:
32:
26:
1721:
1720:
1716:
1715:
1714:
1712:
1711:
1710:
1694:
1659:
1654:
1653:
1652:
1645:
1641:
1582:
1579:
1563:
1536:
1458:
1413:
1371:
1338:
1311:
1272:
1230:
1099:
1057:
1008:Sephiroth storm
999:
979:
933:
906:
878:
867:In the article
865:
842:
838:
797:
761:
744:
725:
707:
665:
652:
645:
619:
577:
560:
541:
522:
399:
357:
311:
291:
230:
215:
189:
174:
141:
131:Bayerischermann
124:
95:
72:
59:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1719:
1717:
1693:
1690:
1689:
1688:
1658:
1657:Biden football
1655:
1651:
1650:
1638:
1637:
1633:
1632:
1631:
1581:
1578:
1562:
1559:
1547:91.190.161.223
1535:
1532:
1531:
1530:
1529:
1528:
1511:
1510:
1480:
1457:
1454:
1453:
1452:
1412:
1409:
1408:
1407:
1370:
1367:
1366:
1365:
1310:
1307:
1305:
1303:
1302:
1271:
1265:
1264:
1263:
1208:
1207:
1206:
1205:
1204:
1203:
1202:
1201:
1200:
1199:
1156:
1155:
1154:
1141:
1140:
1125:
1124:
1098:
1095:
1094:
1093:
1056:
1053:
998:
997:two footballs?
995:
978:
975:
974:
973:
972:
971:
970:
969:
905:
902:
864:
861:
837:
834:
768:206.16.237.230
743:
740:
724:
721:
720:
719:
718:
717:
716:
715:
664:
661:
644:
641:
635:comment added
618:
615:
574:
572:Dissapointment
569:
559:
556:
540:
537:
521:
518:
517:
516:
467:
466:
459:
452:
445:
438:
423:
416:
398:
395:
394:
393:
356:
353:
352:
351:
310:
307:
290:
287:
286:
285:
271:
229:
226:
214:
211:
188:
185:
173:
170:
160:Matthew Reilly
140:
137:
123:
120:
94:
93:why a football
91:
71:
70:disambiguation
68:
65:
64:
52:
51:
34:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1718:
1709:
1707:
1703:
1699:
1691:
1687:
1683:
1679:
1675:
1674:
1673:
1672:
1668:
1664:
1656:
1648:
1643:
1640:
1636:
1630:
1625:
1620:
1617:
1613:
1609:
1604:
1603:
1602:
1601:
1597:
1593:
1589:
1588:
1577:
1576:
1572:
1568:
1560:
1558:
1556:
1552:
1548:
1544:
1533:
1527:
1523:
1519:
1515:
1514:
1513:
1512:
1509:
1505:
1501:
1497:
1493:
1489:
1485:
1481:
1478:
1477:suitcase nuke
1474:
1473:
1472:
1471:
1467:
1463:
1455:
1451:
1447:
1443:
1438:
1437:
1436:
1435:
1431:
1427:
1423:
1419:
1410:
1406:
1402:
1398:
1393:
1389:
1388:
1387:
1386:
1382:
1378:
1377:JessPavarocks
1374:
1368:
1364:
1360:
1357:
1353:
1348:
1342:
1337:
1336:
1335:
1334:
1330:
1326:
1322:
1318:
1314:
1306:
1301:
1297:
1293:
1288:
1287:
1286:
1285:
1281:
1277:
1270:
1266:
1262:
1258:
1254:
1250:
1249:
1248:
1246:
1242:
1238:
1234:
1226:
1225:
1221:
1217:
1213:
1198:
1195:
1191:
1190:
1189:
1186:
1182:
1181:
1180:
1177:
1176:81.77.204.208
1173:
1172:
1171:
1170:
1169:
1165:
1161:
1157:
1153:
1150:
1145:
1144:
1143:
1142:
1139:
1135:
1131:
1127:
1126:
1123:
1119:
1115:
1111:
1110:
1109:
1108:
1105:
1104:71.116.106.31
1096:
1092:
1088:
1084:
1080:
1079:
1078:
1076:
1072:
1068:
1064:
1052:
1051:
1047:
1043:
1042:Simmons123456
1038:
1033:
1031:
1027:
1023:
1018:
1017:
1013:
1009:
1004:
996:
994:
993:
989:
985:
976:
968:
964:
960:
956:
955:
954:
951:
948:
943:
942:
941:
938:
936:
930:
927:
926:
925:
924:
921:
916:
911:
903:
901:
898:
894:
890:
886:
882:
875:
870:
860:
858:
854:
850:
846:
835:
833:
832:
828:
824:
820:
815:
813:
809:
805:
801:
795:
791:
786:
784:
779:
777:
773:
769:
765:
758:
757:
753:
749:
741:
739:
738:
734:
730:
722:
714:
710:
705:
701:
700:
699:
695:
691:
690:75.81.204.244
686:
685:
684:
681:
680:216.138.38.86
676:
675:
674:
673:
670:
662:
660:
659:
655:
650:
642:
640:
638:
634:
628:
624:
616:
614:
613:
609:
605:
600:
597:
593:
589:
585:
581:
573:
568:
563:
557:
555:
554:
550:
546:
538:
536:
535:
531:
527:
519:
515:
511:
507:
502:
501:
500:
499:
495:
491:
485:
482:
481:
474:
472:
464:
460:
457:
453:
450:
446:
443:
439:
436:
433:"? These are
432:
428:
424:
421:
417:
414:
409:
408:
407:
405:
396:
392:
388:
384:
383:76.177.160.69
380:
379:
378:
376:
372:
368:
364:
354:
350:
346:
342:
337:
336:
335:
334:
330:
326:
321:
317:
308:
306:
305:
301:
297:
296:98.16.177.138
288:
284:
280:
276:
275:68.50.168.239
272:
269:
265:
261:
260:76.177.160.69
257:
251:
247:
246:
245:
244:
240:
236:
227:
225:
224:
221:
212:
210:
209:
206:
200:
196:
194:
186:
184:
183:
180:
171:
169:
168:
165:
161:
157:
153:
148:
146:
138:
136:
135:
132:
128:
121:
119:
117:
112:
110:
109:Ghost Freeman
105:
102:
100:
92:
90:
89:
86:
81:
77:
69:
62:
58:
57:
49:
45:
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
1695:
1660:
1642:
1634:
1624:Boracay Bill
1623:
1590:
1583:
1564:
1541:— Preceding
1537:
1500:Andy Dingley
1459:
1426:71.94.174.24
1414:
1391:
1375:
1372:
1323:
1319:
1315:
1312:
1304:
1273:
1237:31.55.124.61
1231:— Preceding
1227:
1216:81.227.83.65
1209:
1100:
1067:75.67.142.56
1058:
1034:
1019:
1000:
980:
947:Simpsons fan
907:
879:— Preceding
866:
849:71.252.64.50
839:
816:
804:61.68.52.170
790:61.68.52.170
787:
780:
759:
745:
726:
666:
646:
631:— Preceding
623:FredrikMeyer
620:
601:
564:
561:
542:
523:
486:
479:
478:
477:these facts
475:
470:
468:
462:
455:
448:
441:
435:weasel words
430:
426:
419:
412:
400:
367:195.238.92.2
358:
312:
292:
249:
231:
220:Me lkjhgfdsa
216:
201:
197:
190:
175:
149:
142:
125:
113:
106:
103:
96:
73:
60:
43:
37:
1194:BlackTerror
1061:—Preceding
843:—Preceding
798:—Preceding
762:—Preceding
723:Wrong Hands
578:—Preceding
361:—Preceding
341:CosineKitty
325:CosineKitty
254:—Preceding
205:Howboutpete
36:This is an
1692:Inaccurate
1635:References
1616:Wtmitchell
1614:, though.
1442:knoodelhed
1269:Gold Codes
1253:Cantab1985
1160:Cantab1985
1114:Cantab1985
1083:Cantab1985
1030:successors
1026:President
959:TiagoTiago
885:Galaxyruin
742:The image.
729:Memextropy
570:See also:
565:See also:
235:RedHillian
122:Be Careful
1622:(earlier
1612:WP:BURDEN
1397:kencf0618
1341:Cjmooney9
1325:Cjmooney9
1292:Mr. Magoo
920:Mad Gouki
506:Syncopate
193:Old Right
61:Archive 1
1592:Egefeyzi
1543:unsigned
1233:unsigned
1130:Shimgray
1063:unsigned
1037:Cold War
893:contribs
881:unsigned
845:unsigned
800:unsigned
764:unsigned
592:contribs
580:unsigned
526:Wasgood1
413:assuming
363:unsigned
339:source.
256:unsigned
116:Ayeroxor
85:Umofomia
80:Football
1608:spoofed
1456:Nuclear
1369:History
1276:Brianga
1185:Vitriol
1040:strike.
669:Vitriol
663:Kaboom!
633:undated
480:require
252:movie.
179:Duckdid
164:MxAesir
39:archive
1678:Pkeets
1663:Pkeets
1619:(talk)
1567:HiLo48
1518:Inowen
1462:Inowen
1418:PhilUK
1411:Weight
1359:(talk)
823:Prezbo
490:ask123
156:Area 7
1522:nlfte
1466:nlfte
1390:This
1356:Chess
688:long.
213:Nixon
16:<
1702:talk
1682:talk
1667:talk
1596:talk
1587:link
1571:talk
1551:talk
1504:talk
1496:TADM
1492:MADM
1488:SADM
1446:talk
1430:talk
1422:talk
1401:talk
1381:talk
1329:talk
1296:talk
1280:talk
1257:talk
1241:talk
1220:talk
1164:talk
1134:talk
1118:talk
1087:talk
1071:talk
1046:talk
1012:talk
988:talk
963:talk
889:talk
853:talk
827:talk
808:talk
794:talk
772:talk
752:talk
733:talk
694:talk
627:talk
608:talk
588:talk
549:talk
530:talk
510:talk
494:talk
431:some
387:talk
371:talk
345:talk
329:talk
300:talk
279:talk
264:talk
239:talk
152:NCIS
934:SQL
709:☠☢☣
654:☠☢☣
584:Zvn
558:Top
471:one
406:":
158:by
99:EAi
1708:1
1704:)
1684:)
1669:)
1598:)
1573:)
1553:)
1524:)
1506:)
1494:,
1490:,
1468:)
1448:)
1432:)
1403:)
1392:is
1383:)
1331:)
1298:)
1282:)
1259:)
1243:)
1222:)
1166:)
1136:|
1132:|
1120:)
1089:)
1073:)
1048:)
1032:.
1014:)
990:)
965:)
950:66
895:)
891:•
855:)
829:)
810:)
774:)
754:)
735:)
706:-
696:)
651:-
629:)
610:)
594:)
590:•
575:?
551:)
532:)
512:)
496:)
389:)
373:)
347:)
331:)
302:)
281:)
266:)
241:)
233:--
162:.
83:--
1700:(
1680:(
1665:(
1626:)
1594:(
1569:(
1549:(
1520:(
1502:(
1464:(
1444:(
1428:(
1420:(
1399:(
1379:(
1343::
1339:@
1327:(
1294:(
1278:(
1255:(
1239:(
1218:(
1162:(
1116:(
1085:(
1069:(
1044:(
1010:(
986:(
961:(
887:(
851:(
825:(
821:.
806:(
792:(
770:(
750:(
731:(
692:(
678:-
625:(
606:(
586:(
547:(
528:(
508:(
492:(
461:"
454:"
447:"
440:"
425:"
418:"
402:"
385:(
369:(
343:(
327:(
298:(
277:(
262:(
237:(
50:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.