Knowledge (XXG)

Talk:SMS Nürnberg (1916)/GA1

Source 📝

53: 585:
Some key information is missing from the second para, being left to the reader to infer. It says Reuter transmitted the order to his ships, and the next comment is about British sailors using explosive charges on N.’s anchor chains. There should be at least a comment confirming that the officers on
187:
We now know that the planned operation that led to the Wilhelmshaven mutiny would have taken place in the closing days of the war because we know the day on which the Armistice was eventually signed, but this was not known at the time. It could say N. was assigned to the operation by the HSF that
586:
N. attempted to scuttle her, apparently with some success. N. was re-floated in July so presumably she was dragged aground on 21 June. There should be at least a comment confirming that the British were successful in dragging her aground and preventing her from sinking in deeper water.
336:
it is necessary to explain the background. At present, it just looks like an anachronism. I suggest you omit the apparent anachronism from the lead and put the appropriate level of detail later in the article. (They didn't
316:
Hipper and Scheer both knew the war was lost and would be over soon. Their primary goal was to do significant damage to the Grand Fleet to put Germany in a better position at the coming peace talks.
181:
It says the ship was named after the previous light cruiser. I doubt this. I suggest it should say the ship was named after the city in Bavaria and was the second German ship to carry this name.
497:
There's no "!7 May" - I assume you're talking about "17 November", in which case it does not need a year; you only need a year if it has changed since the last time a year was used.
58: 91: 137: 81: 133: 590: 379:
Two were placed side by side forward on the forecastle, four were located amidships, two on either side, and two were arranged in a super firing pair aft.
63: 118: 332:
You know that, and now I know that, but we can't assume the readers will have that background knowledge. If it is essential to use the expression
110: 184:
The second para says N. saw limited service during the war. It should clarify what war is intended, either by blue-linking or extra detail.
191:
N. was sunk as a gunnery target in 1922. This is separate from the events of June 1919. I suggest it should be given its own sentence.
86: 440:
is blue linked twice in this section. (I don’t have a problem with that, but it is probably your practice to avoid overlinking.)
167: 341:
the war was lost and would soon be over because no-one can have knowledge about something that hasn't happened. Perhaps they
217:
says "the four units of this class were given the names of the commerce raiding cruisers sunk in the early part of the war."
32:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
649:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
126: 17: 237: 436:
is not blue linked at its first appearance, although it is so linked in the final sentence of the second para.
252: 247: 103: 381:
At first reading, these add up to ten guns. It was only at a subsequent reading that it became clear
226:
four other ships previously sunk but that is not the same as saying any of these four new ships was
633: 603: 544: 526: 502: 474: 456: 417: 399: 355: 321: 301: 271: 201: 161: 640: 610: 548: 533: 506: 478: 463: 421: 406: 362: 325: 208: 171: 624: 594: 540: 517: 498: 470: 447: 413: 390: 346: 317: 292: 262: 192: 157: 385:
was refering to the four that were located amidships. I suggest the expression
286:
World War I is linked in the first para - this shouldn't need to be repeated.
256: 241: 514:;after realizing the British had fled, the German forces returned to port. 578:
was among the ships interned. Presumably this should be
389:
should be given different punctuation such as brackets.
145: 114: 377:
N. was armed with eight guns. The second para says
222:I accept that the source says the four ships were 620:Two images checked. Both adequately licenced. 345:the war was lost and would soon be over. ;)) 593:would be good; possibly as a "Main" hatnote. 246:That was in 1933. It wasn’t named after the 8: 591:Scuttling of the German fleet in Scapa Flow 188:was planned to take place in October 1918. 41: 570:Most of the ships of the High Seas Fleet 215:Conway's All the World's Fighting Ships 72: 44: 563:I suggest this be refined to either: 255:was named after the Bavarian city of 7: 623:No disambiguation pages identified. 444:Reuter could not locate the vessels. 28:The following discussion is closed. 561:Most of the High Seas Fleet’s ships 250:. (Knowledge (XXG) also says the 24: 493:It should include also the year. 645:The discussion above is closed. 539:Semi-colons are perfectly fine. 616:Images and disambiguation pages 516:This should be a new sentence. 334:in the closing days of the war 1: 641:10:32, 10 February 2012 (UTC) 549:13:10, 10 February 2012 (UTC) 507:13:10, 10 February 2012 (UTC) 611:12:58, 8 February 2012 (UTC) 534:12:58, 8 February 2012 (UTC) 479:12:53, 8 February 2012 (UTC) 464:07:18, 8 February 2012 (UTC) 422:12:53, 8 February 2012 (UTC) 407:02:42, 8 February 2012 (UTC) 363:02:53, 7 February 2012 (UTC) 326:01:00, 7 February 2012 (UTC) 240:was named after the city of 209:02:51, 6 February 2012 (UTC) 172:10:47, 5 February 2012 (UTC) 567:Most of the High Seas Fleet 664: 485:Battle of Heligoland Bight 446:Who, or what, was Reuter? 235:Knowledge (XXG) says the 647:Please do not modify it. 30:Please do not modify it. 18:Talk:SMS Nürnberg (1916) 238:German cruiser Nürnberg 559:The second para says 489:This section begins 253:SMS Nürnberg (1906) 248:SMS Nürnberg (1916) 387:two on either side 383:two on either side 224:given the names of 31: 512:The section ends 100: 99: 29: 655: 636: 629: 606: 599: 529: 522: 459: 452: 438:Sworbe Peninsula 428:Operation Albion 402: 395: 358: 351: 304: 297: 274: 267: 204: 197: 150: 141: 122: 54:Copyvio detector 42: 663: 662: 658: 657: 656: 654: 653: 652: 651: 650: 634: 625: 618: 604: 595: 557: 527: 518: 487: 457: 448: 430: 400: 391: 375: 356: 347: 302: 293: 272: 263: 202: 193: 179: 131: 108: 102: 96: 68: 40: 34: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 661: 659: 644: 617: 614: 572: 571: 568: 556: 553: 552: 551: 510: 509: 491:On 17 May, ... 486: 483: 482: 481: 429: 426: 425: 424: 374: 371: 370: 369: 368: 367: 366: 365: 313: 312: 311: 310: 309: 308: 283: 282: 281: 280: 279: 278: 232: 231: 178: 175: 151: 98: 97: 95: 94: 89: 84: 78: 75: 74: 70: 69: 67: 66: 64:External links 61: 56: 50: 47: 46: 39: 36: 35: 26: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 660: 648: 643: 642: 639: 637: 630: 628: 621: 615: 613: 612: 609: 607: 600: 598: 592: 587: 583: 581: 577: 569: 566: 565: 564: 562: 554: 550: 546: 542: 538: 537: 536: 535: 532: 530: 523: 521: 515: 508: 504: 500: 496: 495: 494: 492: 484: 480: 476: 472: 468: 467: 466: 465: 462: 460: 453: 451: 445: 441: 439: 435: 427: 423: 419: 415: 411: 410: 409: 408: 405: 403: 396: 394: 388: 384: 380: 372: 364: 361: 359: 352: 350: 344: 340: 335: 331: 330: 329: 328: 327: 323: 319: 315: 314: 307: 305: 298: 296: 290: 289: 288: 287: 285: 284: 277: 275: 268: 266: 260: 258: 254: 249: 245: 243: 239: 234: 233: 229: 225: 221: 220: 219: 218: 216: 213: 212: 211: 210: 207: 205: 198: 196: 189: 185: 182: 176: 174: 173: 169: 166: 163: 159: 156: 152: 149: 148: 144: 139: 135: 130: 129: 125: 120: 116: 112: 107: 106: 93: 90: 88: 85: 83: 80: 79: 77: 76: 71: 65: 62: 60: 57: 55: 52: 51: 49: 48: 43: 37: 33: 19: 646: 631: 626: 622: 619: 601: 596: 588: 584: 579: 575: 573: 560: 558: 524: 519: 513: 511: 490: 488: 469:Both fixed. 454: 449: 443: 442: 437: 433: 431: 397: 392: 386: 382: 378: 376: 373:Construction 353: 348: 342: 338: 333: 299: 294: 269: 264: 251: 236: 227: 223: 214: 199: 194: 190: 186: 183: 180: 164: 154: 153: 146: 142: 128:Article talk 127: 123: 104: 101: 92:Instructions 27: 434:Admiralstab 412:Clarified. 228:named after 115:visual edit 589:A link to 59:Authorship 45:GA toolbox 576:Karlsruhe 541:Parsecboy 499:Parsecboy 471:Parsecboy 414:Parsecboy 318:Parsecboy 291:I agree. 257:Nuremberg 242:Nuremberg 158:Dolphin51 155:Reviewer: 82:Templates 73:Reviewing 38:GA Review 580:Nurnberg 574:It says 343:believed 168:contribs 87:Criteria 627:Dolphin 597:Dolphin 520:Dolphin 450:Dolphin 393:Dolphin 349:Dolphin 295:Dolphin 265:Dolphin 230:a ship. 195:Dolphin 138:history 119:history 105:Article 147:Watch 16:< 555:Fate 545:talk 503:talk 475:talk 432:The 418:talk 339:know 322:talk 177:Lead 162:talk 134:edit 111:edit 582:? 547:) 505:) 477:) 420:) 324:) 261:) 170:) 136:| 117:| 113:| 638:) 635:t 632:( 608:) 605:t 602:( 543:( 531:) 528:t 525:( 501:( 473:( 461:) 458:t 455:( 416:( 404:) 401:t 398:( 360:) 357:t 354:( 320:( 306:) 303:t 300:( 276:) 273:t 270:( 259:. 244:. 206:) 203:t 200:( 165:· 160:( 143:· 140:) 132:( 124:· 121:) 109:(

Index

Talk:SMS Nürnberg (1916)
Copyvio detector
Authorship
External links
Templates
Criteria
Instructions
Article
edit
visual edit
history
Article talk
edit
history
Watch
Dolphin51
talk
contribs
10:47, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
Dolphin
t
02:51, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
German cruiser Nürnberg
Nuremberg
SMS Nürnberg (1916)
SMS Nürnberg (1906)
Nuremberg
Dolphin
t
Dolphin

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.