329:
294:
238:
214:
500:, but I'm not sure any of them are reliable. The "music notation train wreck" should probably be removed. It's a metaphor not in keeping with Knowledge's writing style that is highly editorialized and I'm not actually sure what it means. In comparison, saying the UI is crowded, has too many floating docks, is difficult to use and has poor instructions are all much more encyclopedic ways to describe criticisms.
71:
21:
405:, declares: "I am a paid editor of this nature, but one that has taken the time to understand the rules, get involved and vowed to not touch articles directly, but collaborate with neutral editors". I note that despite this "vow", CorporateM has indeed "touched' this article directly. If, as it appears, this the case, then that editor has acted here in clear violation of the guidelines established at
187:
121:
162:
490:
I've moved the string down here. Just as SmartScore probably believes the sources themselves are bias, it is unlikely the company will ever be happy with the article here. There is no "neutral" versus "negative" - there is only whether it is representative of the source material. If the most credible
527:
page. I have parsed the page recently and feel the "Reception" section still needs to be revised to reflect SmartScore's current status more accurately. SmartScore X2 was released in 2013 with significant improvements in recognition accuracy due to a redesigned recognition engine. However, potential
553:
and see if they agree with his statement that "I'm not sure any of (the reviews) are reliable". We are also requesting that the "Reception" section clearly indicate that the listed reviews are chronological (from older to newer meaning the list starts from "bad" to "better")... perhaps by preceding
432:, if I am actually on their payroll, we must be working in-concert and our entire discussion must be a complex ruse. It's an elaborate, speculation without evidence or actual content issues, followed by a proposal to revert the article to your version.
428:, though I suspect you might experience a boomerang. No COI has been disclosed, nor does one exist, nor is there any evidence of one. Your accusation implies a complex conspiracy, whereas even though I am lecturing the actual PR editor
595:
528:
customers often still refer to "less than stellar" reviews on SmartScore's
Knowledge page when they inquire. We feel this reflects unfavorably on Musitek and could be considered unfair.
535:, whom we have now learned purchased an earlier copy of SmartScore in 2008, and may have had disappointing results for reasons not necessarily the fault of SmartScore, to revisit
491:
reviews are negative, than a neutral article will have a critical perspective of the software. Also, it is the burden of the editor wishing to add material to provide the sources.
580:
605:
590:
278:
409:. I suggest that all such edits, and all comments made here, should be considered null, and the article be edited as if CorporateM had never "touched" it.
393:
It appears that an editor who has participated in discussions here and has also edited the SmartScore article may have done so for financial reward. In
284:
600:
475:
There are MANY positive reactions to SmarScore X2 throughout the
Internet. Data changes EVERY DAY. USE GOOGLE and find out for yourselves !!!
585:
254:
462:"the user interface was confusing even for advanced users, and that the manual offered "little or no help, especially for the novice"."
452:
The tone and tenor of the "Reception'" page, after numerous and spirited arguments, has now devolved to a tone of pure dismissiveness.
476:
105:
610:
414:
303:
224:
148:
89:
39:
615:
245:
219:
140:
132:
81:
31:
55:
194:
378:
410:
345:
168:
357:
480:
85:
35:
459:" Object Oriented Optical Music Recognition System (O3MR), as well as SharpEye2 outperforms SmartScore."
200:
99:
95:
505:
437:
523:
here. Yes, I am associated with
Musitek and I understand I cannot and will not edit contents of the
466:
I would like to request the following correction(s) to the article on behalf of <<MUSITEK: -->
161:
558:
520:
429:
253:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
45:
363:
539:
page and talk history for evidence of possible bias on his part. Musitek is happy to extend to
562:
49:
359:
328:
547:
540:
532:
501:
433:
406:
402:
425:
574:
471:
Example: In the
Reception section, change to TALKING POINTS from NEGATIVE to NEUTRAL.
293:
543:
a free upgrade to SmartScore X2 Pro. Simply make a request to admin@musitek.com.
237:
213:
120:
536:
524:
80:
to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include
30:
to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include
250:
551:
497:
361:
566:
509:
484:
441:
418:
550:
or any contributor to revisit the SmartScore review page here
364:
322:
180:
156:
115:
65:
15:
292:
147:
here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or
119:
554:
the synopses with the date i.e. 2002 xxxx 2004 xxxx etc.
171:
on 2 August 2013 (UTC). The result of the discussion was
78:
contributor may be personally or professionally connected
28:
contributor may be personally or professionally connected
108:) /Â SmartScore This user has contributed to the article.
58:) /Â SmartScore This user has contributed to the article.
394:
144:
249:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
193:This article has not yet been rated on Knowledge's
596:Unassessed software articles of Unknown-importance
283:This article has not yet received a rating on the
372:This page has archives. Sections older than
8:
516:Request for revision of "Reception" section
424:The right place to bring this up is at the
208:
186:
184:
581:Articles edited by connected contributors
210:
129:Individuals with a conflict of interest
382:when more than 3 sections are present.
145:request corrections or suggest content
139:not to directly edit the article. See
606:Unknown-importance Computing articles
496:I do see a few reviews are mentioned
7:
591:Unknown-importance software articles
243:This article is within the scope of
401:, who appears to be identical with
199:It is of interest to the following
14:
456:a "musical notation train-wreck."
376:may be automatically archived by
426:Conflict of Interest Noticeboard
327:
236:
212:
185:
160:
135:the subject of the article, are
69:
19:
167:This article was nominated for
263:Knowledge:WikiProject Software
141:Knowledge:Conflict of interest
1:
601:Unassessed Computing articles
301:This article is supported by
266:Template:WikiProject Software
257:and see a list of open tasks.
586:Unassessed software articles
510:04:30, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
485:02:58, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
632:
442:02:14, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
419:00:46, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
285:project's importance scale
567:20:08, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
546:In addition, I encourage
300:
282:
231:
207:
76:The following Knowledge
26:The following Knowledge
151:if the issue is urgent.
611:All Computing articles
557:Thanks for listening.
379:Lowercase sigmabot III
297:
124:
616:All Software articles
411:Justlettersandnumbers
304:WikiProject Computing
296:
131:, particularly those
123:
90:neutral point of view
40:neutral point of view
246:WikiProject Software
82:conflict of interest
32:conflict of interest
298:
195:content assessment
125:
386:
385:
351:
350:
319:
318:
315:
314:
311:
310:
269:software articles
179:
178:
155:
154:
114:
113:
64:
63:
623:
400:
381:
365:
342:
341:
331:
323:
271:
270:
267:
264:
261:
240:
233:
232:
227:
216:
209:
190:
189:
188:
181:
164:
157:
137:strongly advised
116:
73:
72:
66:
23:
22:
16:
631:
630:
626:
625:
624:
622:
621:
620:
571:
570:
548:User:CorporateM
541:User:CorporateM
533:User:CorporateM
518:
450:
448:Message from IP
403:User:CorporateM
398:
391:
377:
366:
360:
336:
268:
265:
262:
259:
258:
222:
70:
20:
12:
11:
5:
629:
627:
619:
618:
613:
608:
603:
598:
593:
588:
583:
573:
572:
517:
514:
513:
512:
493:
492:
473:
472:
464:
463:
460:
457:
449:
446:
445:
444:
390:
387:
384:
383:
371:
368:
367:
362:
358:
356:
353:
352:
349:
348:
338:
337:
332:
326:
317:
316:
313:
312:
309:
308:
299:
289:
288:
281:
275:
274:
272:
255:the discussion
241:
229:
228:
217:
205:
204:
198:
191:
177:
176:
165:
153:
152:
126:
112:
111:
110:
109:
74:
62:
61:
60:
59:
24:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
628:
617:
614:
612:
609:
607:
604:
602:
599:
597:
594:
592:
589:
587:
584:
582:
579:
578:
576:
569:
568:
564:
560:
555:
552:
549:
544:
542:
538:
534:
531:We appeal to
529:
526:
522:
515:
511:
507:
503:
499:
495:
494:
489:
488:
487:
486:
482:
478:
470:
469:
468:
461:
458:
455:
454:
453:
447:
443:
439:
435:
431:
427:
423:
422:
421:
420:
416:
412:
408:
404:
396:
388:
380:
375:
370:
369:
355:
354:
347:
344:
343:
340:
339:
335:
330:
325:
324:
321:
306:
305:
295:
291:
290:
286:
280:
277:
276:
273:
256:
252:
248:
247:
242:
239:
235:
234:
230:
226:
221:
218:
215:
211:
206:
202:
196:
192:
183:
182:
174:
170:
166:
163:
159:
158:
150:
146:
142:
138:
134:
130:
127:
122:
118:
117:
107:
104:
101:
97:
94:
93:
91:
87:
86:autobiography
83:
79:
75:
68:
67:
57:
54:
51:
47:
44:
43:
41:
37:
36:autobiography
33:
29:
25:
18:
17:
556:
545:
530:
521:User:KLafong
519:
477:70.57.197.92
474:
465:
451:
430:User:KLafong
392:
389:Paid editor?
373:
333:
320:
302:
244:
201:WikiProjects
172:
136:
133:representing
128:
102:
77:
52:
27:
173:speedy keep
96:Chrisnewell
575:Categories
537:SmartScore
525:SmartScore
502:CorporateM
434:CorporateM
399:(Redacted)
149:contact us
143:. You may
395:this diff
346:Archive 1
225:Computing
407:WP:NOPAY
334:Archives
260:Software
251:software
220:Software
169:deletion
106:contribs
56:contribs
559:KLafong
374:30 days
46:KLafong
197:scale.
88:, and
38:, and
467:: -->
563:talk
506:Talk
498:here
481:talk
438:Talk
415:talk
100:talk
50:talk
279:???
92:.
42:.
577::
565:)
508:)
483:)
440:)
417:)
397:,
223::
84:,
34:,
561:(
504:(
479:(
436:(
413:(
307:.
287:.
203::
175:.
103:·
98:(
53:·
48:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
