Knowledge (XXG)

Talk:San Francisco garter snake

Source 📝

74: 53: 265: 175: 151: 305: 185: 407: 717: 348: 253: 22: 481:
the wiki fauna naming conventions is somewhat ambiguous, but in the five examples i read in the conventions all five had caps. further the following quote is found there: "The underlying rationale for capitalization is that this signals to the reader that we are indicating a particular, exact species
595:
While climbing down my back yard (Ulloa near Kensington Street in San Francisco), I saw one today (Aug. 25, 2011). Naturally, it fled and stopped when it found itself unable to go beneath my retaining wall. It studied me and probably figured out that I was not a threat. This was the first time in
633:
That's certainly possible, but isn't it more likely that it was an escaped pet? I've found exotic pets wandering throughout the neighborhoods of the Bay Area. There was even a trend of keeping pet alligators in the 1970s, as you may recall, some of which found their way into the streets. Although
529:
one) for breeding purposes (IIRC)? I'm thinking the breeding population is probably noteworthy enough; and the only displayed population in the US being in San Francisco might also be noteworthy, especially since all 10 used to be housed there (although I suppose I am probably a bit biased on that
579:
The article indicates that these snakes range south of San Francisco. However, about 10 years ago my son and I were at the playground in Glen Park Canyon, San Francisco. Several children saw a snake and one of the dad's caught it. I'm no authority, but that gentleman claimed that it was a San
561:
on the snakes (although that was through Google, not their search function, for some reason); since you've got a fact sheet link up from another zoo anyway (i.e. indicated that fact sheets are worthwhile links), I'm thinking it might be nice to add one from a zoo where they're actually being
634:
it is mostly shrouded in urban legend now, I saw one in 1977. And before anyone dismisses this idea, look into how easy it was to get a pet alligator up to the 1970s. Younger people might not realize how much of a wild west the marketplace in exotic animals was back then.
584:
you should publish an article on your sighting. it would be quite significant if verified. to my knowledge there is no literature to support populations in sf. in fact some of the literature emphatically states the species is not in sf. cheers
617:
In the early 1960s we found one around 130 Fillmore St., corner of Germania. Someone who knew snakes identified it as a San Francisco Garter Snake. They explained that it was rare. Sightings get mentioned in the news occasionally.
482:
and avoiding ambiguity." this sentiment is clearly applicable here since we are trying to tell the reader foremost that this is a recognized distinct species and not just a "form" of the common garter snake or an area name.
729: 520:
I notice that the article doesn't really have any information on captive populations. In particular, might it be worth mentioning that there are, to my knowledge, only 10 individuals in US zoos, 4 on display at the
278: 161: 778: 580:
Francisco Garter Snake. Other than being actually in San Francisco, the habitat is correct: heavily vegitated wetlands (the bottom of the canyon) with hills around. The snake was released up the canyon.
133: 803: 283: 773: 123: 783: 808: 798: 99: 86: 58: 793: 768: 237: 243: 823: 737: 813: 213: 461: 399: 330: 788: 603: 198: 156: 322: 818: 505:
in the state. Its range is also associated with a densely populated part of the state in a locale of high "name recognition".
33: 690: 540:
possibly worth mentioning, but i dont have reference to the above. if you can provide ref i shall be glad to add a mention.
270: 444:
the literature shows it both ways. i guess i was playing to the consistency of wikipedia where it is capitalised in the
316: 375: 554: 435: 39: 607: 749: 501:
I have designated this page as an importance=High based upon the fact that this is within a small number of
90:, an effort to make Knowledge (XXG) a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource for 656:
This article has been nominated for delisting as a good article. Please provide comments for the review.
599: 530:
note, so a second opinion is good). And yes, I can get more information/confirm stuff if it's needed. -
363: 212:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
326: 21: 639: 445: 432: 745: 733: 720:
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between
687: 502: 380: 671: 347: 623: 522: 190: 667: 650: 657: 325:
at the time. There are suggestions below for improving the article. If you can improve it,
707:
Hi, I live in Berlin and have seen San Francisco gartersnakes in a number of pet stores.
753: 697: 660: 643: 635: 627: 611: 589: 566: 553:
Okay, found a reference by Googling it. SFGate.com has what looks like a good article
544: 534: 509: 486: 468: 452: 438: 73: 52: 98:. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the 762: 679: 586: 563: 541: 531: 526: 483: 449: 392: 619: 174: 150: 716: 558: 506: 465: 431:
nake? It isn't a complete proper noun, as if it were all a place or anything.
260: 208: 203: 180: 384: 358: 91: 674:. Once the article is brought up to standard, it may be renominated for GA. 252: 95: 596:
over twelve years that I've seen one in the back yard. 1Z-203 out.
557:, and it even mentions that 6 went to San Diego. I also found the 388: 562:
displayed, so I guess I'll stick that in the external links. -
342: 299: 15: 367:
column on 16 May 2006. The text of the entry was as follows:
405: 251: 321:, but it was removed from the list as it no longer met the 779:
B-Class amphibian and reptile articles of Low-importance
202:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the 670:. It does not meet GA criteria, which can be found at 711:
Wiki Education assignment: California Natural History
108:
Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles
242:This article has not yet received a rating on the 525:and 6 in a Southern California zoo (I think the 804:Low-importance San Francisco Bay Area articles 774:Low-importance amphibian and reptile articles 8: 784:WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles articles 497:Importance ranking in Wikiproject California 111:Template:WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles 809:San Francisco Bay Area task force articles 462:Knowledge (XXG):Naming conventions (fauna) 145: 47: 400:Knowledge (XXG):Recent additions/2006/May 799:B-Class San Francisco Bay Area articles 406: 147: 49: 19: 794:Unknown-importance California articles 769:B-Class amphibian and reptile articles 423:Why is the "g" and "s" capitalized in 222:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject California 824:Knowledge (XXG) Did you know articles 398:A record of the entry may be seen at 7: 196:This article is within the scope of 666:This article has been delisted per 87:WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles 38:It is of interest to the following 725: 721: 14: 279:San Francisco Bay Area task force 728:. Further details are available 715: 575:Are they never in San Francisco? 346: 303: 263: 183: 173: 149: 72: 51: 20: 814:WikiProject California articles 225:Template:WikiProject California 128:This article has been rated as 644:02:09, 26 September 2023 (UTC) 559:San Francisco Zoo's fact sheet 357:appeared on Knowledge (XXG)'s 114:amphibian and reptile articles 1: 744:— Assignment last updated by 276:This article is supported by 271:San Francisco Bay Area portal 216:and see a list of open tasks. 754:22:15, 21 October 2022 (UTC) 510:16:52, 22 October 2006 (UTC) 789:B-Class California articles 612:23:38, 25 August 2011 (UTC) 840: 628:22:24, 9 August 2015 (UTC) 376:San Francisco garter snake 355:San Francisco garter snake 311:San Francisco garter snake 244:project's importance scale 134:project's importance scale 81:San Francisco garter snake 259: 241: 168: 127: 67: 46: 698:17:07, 18 May 2007 (UTC) 590:13:55, 16 May 2006 (UTC) 567:17:15, 16 May 2006 (UTC) 545:13:53, 16 May 2006 (UTC) 535:01:10, 16 May 2006 (UTC) 487:00:11, 16 May 2006 (UTC) 469:23:21, 15 May 2006 (UTC) 453:22:27, 15 May 2006 (UTC) 439:21:41, 15 May 2006 (UTC) 661:01:54, 8 May 2007 (UTC) 105:Amphibians and Reptiles 59:Amphibians and Reptiles 819:Delisted good articles 411: 336:Review: May 18, 2007. 256: 199:WikiProject California 162:San Francisco Bay Area 28:This article is rated 732:. Student editor(s): 409: 323:good article criteria 255: 102:for more information. 32:on Knowledge (XXG)'s 391:but is not found in 651:Good Article Review 503:endangered reptiles 446:Common Garter Snake 228:California articles 730:on the course page 703:European pet trade 412: 381:endangered species 257: 34:content assessment 602:comment added by 523:San Francisco Zoo 516:US Zoo Population 416: 415: 341: 340: 337: 329:; it may then be 298: 297: 294: 293: 290: 289: 191:California portal 144: 143: 140: 139: 831: 756: 738:article contribs 727: 723: 719: 695: 685: 682: 614: 408: 350: 343: 335: 307: 306: 300: 273: 268: 267: 266: 230: 229: 226: 223: 220: 193: 188: 187: 186: 177: 170: 169: 164: 153: 146: 116: 115: 112: 109: 106: 76: 69: 68: 63: 55: 48: 31: 25: 24: 16: 839: 838: 834: 833: 832: 830: 829: 828: 759: 758: 743: 726:2 December 2022 713: 705: 694: 691: 683: 680: 654: 597: 577: 518: 499: 421: 410:Knowledge (XXG) 304: 269: 264: 262: 227: 224: 221: 218: 217: 189: 184: 182: 159: 113: 110: 107: 104: 103: 61: 29: 12: 11: 5: 837: 835: 827: 826: 821: 816: 811: 806: 801: 796: 791: 786: 781: 776: 771: 761: 760: 722:24 August 2022 712: 709: 704: 701: 692: 676: 675: 653: 648: 647: 646: 593: 592: 576: 573: 572: 571: 570: 569: 548: 547: 517: 514: 513: 498: 495: 494: 493: 492: 491: 490: 489: 474: 473: 472: 471: 456: 455: 420: 419:Capitalisation 417: 414: 413: 403: 397: 396: 351: 339: 338: 334: 308: 296: 295: 292: 291: 288: 287: 284:Low-importance 275: 274: 258: 248: 247: 240: 234: 233: 231: 214:the discussion 195: 194: 178: 166: 165: 154: 142: 141: 138: 137: 130:Low-importance 126: 120: 119: 117: 77: 65: 64: 62:Low‑importance 56: 44: 43: 37: 26: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 836: 825: 822: 820: 817: 815: 812: 810: 807: 805: 802: 800: 797: 795: 792: 790: 787: 785: 782: 780: 777: 775: 772: 770: 767: 766: 764: 757: 755: 751: 747: 746:Pumpkinsmash1 741: 739: 735: 734:Pumpkinsmash1 731: 718: 710: 708: 702: 700: 699: 696: 688: 686: 673: 669: 665: 664: 663: 662: 659: 652: 649: 645: 641: 637: 632: 631: 630: 629: 625: 621: 615: 613: 609: 605: 604:75.17.116.118 601: 591: 588: 583: 582: 581: 574: 568: 565: 560: 556: 552: 551: 550: 549: 546: 543: 539: 538: 537: 536: 533: 528: 524: 515: 512: 511: 508: 504: 496: 488: 485: 480: 479: 478: 477: 476: 475: 470: 467: 463: 460: 459: 458: 457: 454: 451: 447: 443: 442: 441: 440: 437: 434: 430: 426: 418: 404: 401: 394: 393:San Francisco 390: 386: 382: 378: 377: 373:... that the 372: 369: 368: 366: 365: 360: 356: 352: 349: 345: 344: 332: 328: 324: 320: 319: 318: 312: 309: 302: 301: 285: 282:(assessed as 281: 280: 272: 261: 254: 250: 249: 245: 239: 236: 235: 232: 215: 211: 210: 205: 201: 200: 192: 181: 179: 176: 172: 171: 167: 163: 158: 155: 152: 148: 135: 131: 125: 122: 121: 118: 101: 97: 93: 89: 88: 83: 82: 78: 75: 71: 70: 66: 60: 57: 54: 50: 45: 41: 35: 27: 23: 18: 17: 742: 714: 706: 677: 655: 616: 598:— Preceding 594: 578: 519: 500: 428: 424: 422: 374: 371:Did you know 370: 364:Did you know 362: 354: 353:A fact from 317:good article 315: 314: 310: 277: 207: 197: 129: 100:project page 85: 80: 79: 40:WikiProjects 658:ChicagoPimp 383:capable of 331:renominated 84:is part of 763:Categories 436:That's hot 219:California 209:California 204:U.S. state 157:California 92:amphibians 678:Regards, 636:Viriditas 527:San Diego 448:article. 385:digesting 359:Main Page 327:please do 672:WP:WIAGA 600:unsigned 587:Covalent 564:Bulbaboy 542:Covalent 532:Bulbaboy 484:Covalent 450:Covalent 96:reptiles 668:WP:GA/R 620:Zyxwv99 433:Mike H. 361:in the 132:on the 30:B-class 507:Anlace 466:Dawson 427:arter 387:toxic 379:is an 313:was a 36:scale. 389:newts 750:talk 724:and 684:Love 681:Lara 640:talk 624:talk 608:talk 555:here 94:and 740:). 238:??? 206:of 124:Low 765:: 752:) 642:) 626:) 610:) 286:). 160:: 748:( 736:( 693:C 689:/ 638:( 622:( 606:( 464:- 429:s 425:g 402:. 395:? 333:. 246:. 136:. 42::

Index


content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Amphibians and Reptiles
WikiProject icon
WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles
amphibians
reptiles
project page
Low
project's importance scale
WikiProject icon
California
San Francisco Bay Area
WikiProject icon
California portal
WikiProject California
U.S. state
California
the discussion
???
project's importance scale
Taskforce icon
San Francisco Bay Area portal
San Francisco Bay Area task force
Low-importance
good article
good article criteria
please do

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.