327:
no "inside" cube, but rather a 4D void that is *bounded* by (8) 3D cubes. For yet another, no the larger "cube" does not count as the 8th cube. For still another, please understand that mathematically, this projection was built looking orthogonally directly down one axis. That means that two cubes are effectively super-imposed on one another. That "internal" cube is really 2 cubes bounding a 4D void on either side (as are the other 6 cubes, each pair in a different 3-brane). And for yet another, please understand that the six distorted side cubes do not have a face that creates the outer wall of the "Big Cube". No. Each of those side cubes (due to distortion) are actually concave regions: Both their "inner" and "outer" faces are super-imposed on top of each other--due to fact we are mathematically looking down axis in K Dimension. In other words, one of the faces attaches to one of the "inner" cubes and the other face attaches to the other cube.
84:
74:
53:
176:
158:
273:
248:
22:
345:
In the
Exploded Schlegel Model, the 8 cubes are clearly visible surrounding a 4D void. They have no outside faces and each face is identified (with markup features) as adjoining an adjacent cube's face. There are clearly 6 ways to circumnavigate the tesseract. The inner 4D void symbolically has 8
326:
There are a number of misleading aspects of a
Schlegel Diagram as it relates to tesseracts. The diagram is *accurate* but only to the degree that people are aware of the distortions. For example, a tesseract has *zero* outside faces. Each face attaches to an adjoining cube. For another, there is
341:
To verify the veracity of this claim, one merely has to do the work. We are only talking about a small number of vertices from (0,0,0,0) to (1,1,1,1)--16. It is not that hard. The trick is to appreciate the multiple 3-branes--another assumption is that all 8 cubes are in (x,y,z). They are not.
333:
I would offer another model--if people are interested in seeing it--that has its own distortion but of a different type, due to the mathematical viewing angle. As such, it clarifies the
Schlegel Diagram and the Schlegel clarifies it. Together, they make it possible to comprehend tesseracts.
337:
Why is this valuable? There are actually applications for tesseracts. It goes beyond the scope of this, but in a nutshell, one way is that it demonstrates a way to abstractly increase information density by many times...but only if people *understand* them.
140:
414:
224:
404:
230:
130:
376:
The opening sentence says it is a projection and distortion is necessary. Do you want some example animations of 3D rotations of 4D projected figures?
399:
409:
279:
253:
106:
200:
97:
58:
183:
163:
33:
362:
Ok, well have let this cook for a while. No responses yet. Will try an edit and see what people think. Thanks.
21:
367:
353:
363:
349:
346:
in/out vectors (which would only be literal in-out vectors in 4D space). My sources are my own work.
39:
83:
284:
258:
199:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
105:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
330:
So that boggles the mind, right? The
Schlegel Diagram is *accurate* but by itself misleading.
89:
73:
52:
381:
175:
157:
319:
Missing
Discussion of Projection Distortions Associated W/Schlegel Diagram From 4D to 2D
342:
Two are in (x,y,z), two are in (x,y,k), two are in (y,z,k), and two are in, (x,z,k).
393:
377:
102:
272:
247:
79:
196:
192:
385:
371:
357:
188:
15:
187:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
101:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
229:This article has not yet received a rating on the
282:, a project which is currently considered to be
8:
19:
242:
152:
47:
294:Knowledge:WikiProject Uniform Polytopes
244:
154:
49:
297:Template:WikiProject Uniform Polytopes
415:Unknown-importance Polyhedra articles
7:
278:This article is within the scope of
181:This article is within the scope of
95:This article is within the scope of
38:It is of interest to the following
14:
405:Mid-priority mathematics articles
115:Knowledge:WikiProject Mathematics
400:Start-Class mathematics articles
271:
246:
174:
156:
118:Template:WikiProject Mathematics
82:
72:
51:
20:
209:Knowledge:WikiProject Polyhedra
135:This article has been rated as
410:Start-Class Polyhedra articles
212:Template:WikiProject Polyhedra
1:
280:WikiProject Uniform Polytopes
203:and see a list of open tasks.
109:and see a list of open tasks.
358:16:52, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
386:15:36, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
372:13:43, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
431:
300:Uniform Polytopes articles
231:project's importance scale
266:
228:
169:
134:
67:
46:
141:project's priority scale
98:WikiProject Mathematics
28:This article is rated
184:WikiProject Polyhedra
121:mathematics articles
215:Polyhedra articles
90:Mathematics portal
34:content assessment
316:
315:
312:
311:
308:
307:
291:Uniform Polytopes
254:Uniform Polytopes
241:
240:
237:
236:
151:
150:
147:
146:
422:
302:
301:
298:
295:
292:
275:
268:
267:
262:
250:
243:
217:
216:
213:
210:
207:
178:
171:
170:
160:
153:
123:
122:
119:
116:
113:
92:
87:
86:
76:
69:
68:
63:
55:
48:
31:
25:
24:
16:
430:
429:
425:
424:
423:
421:
420:
419:
390:
389:
321:
299:
296:
293:
290:
289:
256:
214:
211:
208:
205:
204:
120:
117:
114:
111:
110:
88:
81:
61:
32:on Knowledge's
29:
12:
11:
5:
428:
426:
418:
417:
412:
407:
402:
392:
391:
320:
317:
314:
313:
310:
309:
306:
305:
303:
276:
264:
263:
251:
239:
238:
235:
234:
227:
221:
220:
218:
201:the discussion
179:
167:
166:
161:
149:
148:
145:
144:
133:
127:
126:
124:
107:the discussion
94:
93:
77:
65:
64:
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
427:
416:
413:
411:
408:
406:
403:
401:
398:
397:
395:
388:
387:
383:
379:
374:
373:
369:
365:
364:LetMeHelp2019
360:
359:
355:
351:
350:LetMeHelp2019
347:
343:
339:
335:
331:
328:
324:
318:
304:
287:
286:
281:
277:
274:
270:
269:
265:
260:
255:
252:
249:
245:
232:
226:
223:
222:
219:
202:
198:
194:
190:
186:
185:
180:
177:
173:
172:
168:
165:
162:
159:
155:
142:
138:
132:
129:
128:
125:
108:
104:
100:
99:
91:
85:
80:
78:
75:
71:
70:
66:
60:
57:
54:
50:
45:
41:
35:
27:
23:
18:
17:
375:
361:
348:
344:
340:
336:
332:
329:
325:
322:
283:
195:, and other
182:
137:Mid-priority
136:
96:
62:Mid‑priority
40:WikiProjects
112:Mathematics
103:mathematics
59:Mathematics
30:Start-class
394:Categories
206:Polyhedra
197:polytopes
193:polyhedra
164:Polyhedra
378:Tom Ruen
323:Hello -
285:inactive
259:inactive
189:polygons
139:on the
36:scale.
382:talk
368:talk
354:talk
225:???
131:Mid
396::
384:)
370:)
356:)
191:,
380:(
366:(
352:(
288:.
261:)
257:(
233:.
143:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
