121:
100:
507:
acceptable and what isn’t to others. For what it’s worth election wards may not be not be particularly notable, but to my mind the information about them does sit better in separate articles rather than trying to fit it all under an article about a place that doesn’t actually constitute the same area as the ward but just happens to have the same name. This is my own personal feeling of course, but in the case of Selly Oak at least, to my mind, the ward and the district are distinct entities which should be treated separately. Incidentally I see that someone has been working on the
336:
311:
213:
189:
69:
461:, and was just trying to save this particular article from deletion. I suspect that this Steve chap was simply trying to separate information of a purely political/administrative nature from the various articles for the different districts of Birmingham, which are very often not coextensive with the electoral wards or Parliamentary constituencies of the same names; as is the case with
223:
392:
322:
21:
506:
Thank you for getting back to me about things – I will remove the deletion template then if you’re happy for me to do so, and I will try and work on the article as much as I’m able. As I am, sadly, only an infrequent contributor to
Knowledge, I’m afraid I’ll have to leave judgements on what’s
480:
Hi yes, by all means go ahead and remove the template if you are expanding the article. Do bear in mind however thatan article about just one Brum ward without all the others might not make much sense, particularly as wards are not really all that
430:
Hi, you're going to have your work cut out if you intend to populate all the blank Brum wards articles. You may wish to check the user's contributions - there are about 20 of them and most of them have PROD tag that will expire in 6
592:
557:
171:
161:
562:
552:
137:
453:
had created a number of ward entries for
Birmingham, but sadly I won’t be contributing to all of them (which would be a large task indeed). In fact I only have information on the
128:
105:
587:
376:
572:
283:
382:
567:
269:
582:
352:
293:
120:
99:
515:
which is essentially about the ward, so I wondered if these two shouldn’t be merged into one? Weoley is an historic area, but the current
343:
316:
597:
577:
245:
133:
236:
194:
80:
408:
528:
519:
article isn’t about this, rather it is about the ward of that name. Anyway, I’ll remove the template from the
470:
465:. Would it be acceptable to now remove the proposed deletion notice from this particular article? Regards (
68:
348:
86:
46:
335:
310:
321:
524:
466:
54:
351:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
244:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
136:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
450:
486:
436:
53:
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
520:
454:
33:
275:
228:
546:
508:
482:
432:
212:
188:
523:
article, and crack on with trying to improve it a little. Many thanks. Regards (
218:
462:
532:
490:
474:
440:
391:
241:
41:
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
516:
512:
278:
in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
274:
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the
62:
15:
593:
Knowledge requested photographs in the West
Midlands (county)
390:
558:
Low-importance
Politics of the United Kingdom articles
563:
Start-Class articles with conflicting quality ratings
347:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
240:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
146:
Knowledge:WikiProject
Politics of the United Kingdom
132:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
149:
Template:WikiProject
Politics of the United Kingdom
553:Stub-Class Politics of the United Kingdom articles
511:article, but that there is also an article called
381:This article has not yet received a rating on the
8:
305:
183:
129:WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom
94:
66:
588:Unknown-importance West Midlands articles
573:Low-importance England-related articles
307:
185:
152:Politics of the United Kingdom articles
96:
7:
568:Start-Class England-related articles
341:This article is within the scope of
234:This article is within the scope of
126:This article is within the scope of
361:Knowledge:WikiProject West Midlands
85:It is of interest to the following
364:Template:WikiProject West Midlands
276:project-independent quality rating
14:
583:Stub-Class West Midlands articles
399:An editor has requested that an
334:
320:
309:
221:
211:
187:
119:
98:
67:
19:
288:This article has been rated as
166:This article has been rated as
143:Politics of the United Kingdom
134:Politics of the United Kingdom
106:Politics of the United Kingdom
1:
533:15:14, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
491:12:52, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
475:10:37, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
441:22:41, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
355:and see a list of open tasks.
254:Knowledge:WikiProject England
248:and see a list of open tasks.
140:and see a list of open tasks.
257:Template:WikiProject England
457:from Christopher Phillips’
614:
459:Birmingham Votes 1911-2000
383:project's importance scale
294:project's importance scale
172:project's importance scale
45:] The anchor (Districts)
598:WikiProject West Midlands
578:WikiProject England pages
398:
380:
344:WikiProject West Midlands
329:
287:
273:
206:
165:
114:
93:
260:England-related articles
395:
367:West Midlands articles
75:This article is rated
394:
237:WikiProject England
396:
81:content assessment
423:
422:
419:
418:
415:
414:
304:
303:
300:
299:
182:
181:
178:
177:
61:
60:
36:in most browsers.
605:
521:Selly Oak (ward)
411:to this article.
369:
368:
365:
362:
359:
338:
331:
330:
325:
324:
323:
313:
306:
262:
261:
258:
255:
252:
231:
226:
225:
224:
215:
208:
207:
202:
199:
191:
184:
154:
153:
150:
147:
144:
123:
116:
115:
110:
102:
95:
78:
72:
71:
63:
55:Reporting errors
47:has been deleted
23:
22:
16:
613:
612:
608:
607:
606:
604:
603:
602:
543:
542:
449:Yes I saw that
428:
366:
363:
360:
357:
356:
319:
259:
256:
253:
250:
249:
227:
222:
220:
200:
197:
151:
148:
145:
142:
141:
108:
79:on Knowledge's
76:
57:
39:
38:
37:
20:
12:
11:
5:
611:
609:
601:
600:
595:
590:
585:
580:
575:
570:
565:
560:
555:
545:
544:
541:
540:
539:
538:
537:
536:
525:Lepidus Magnus
504:
496:
495:
494:
493:
467:Lepidus Magnus
455:Selly Oak ward
447:
427:
426:Selly Oak ward
424:
421:
420:
417:
416:
413:
412:
397:
387:
386:
379:
373:
372:
370:
353:the discussion
339:
327:
326:
314:
302:
301:
298:
297:
290:Low-importance
286:
280:
279:
272:
266:
265:
263:
246:the discussion
233:
232:
229:England portal
216:
204:
203:
201:Low‑importance
192:
180:
179:
176:
175:
168:Low-importance
164:
158:
157:
155:
138:the discussion
124:
112:
111:
109:Low‑importance
103:
91:
90:
84:
73:
59:
58:
52:
51:
50:
34:case-sensitive
28:
27:
26:
24:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
610:
599:
596:
594:
591:
589:
586:
584:
581:
579:
576:
574:
571:
569:
566:
564:
561:
559:
556:
554:
551:
550:
548:
534:
530:
526:
522:
518:
514:
510:
509:Weoley (ward)
505:
502:
501:
500:
499:
498:
497:
492:
488:
484:
479:
478:
476:
472:
468:
464:
460:
456:
452:
448:
446:Hello Kudpung
445:
444:
443:
442:
438:
434:
425:
410:
406:
402:
393:
389:
388:
384:
378:
375:
374:
371:
358:West Midlands
354:
350:
349:West Midlands
346:
345:
340:
337:
333:
332:
328:
318:
317:West Midlands
315:
312:
308:
295:
291:
285:
282:
281:
277:
271:
268:
267:
264:
247:
243:
239:
238:
230:
219:
217:
214:
210:
209:
205:
196:
193:
190:
186:
173:
169:
163:
160:
159:
156:
139:
135:
131:
130:
125:
122:
118:
117:
113:
107:
104:
101:
97:
92:
88:
82:
74:
70:
65:
64:
56:
48:
44:
43:
42:
35:
31:
25:
18:
17:
458:
429:
404:
400:
342:
289:
235:
167:
127:
87:WikiProjects
40:
32:Anchors are
29:
198:Start‑class
547:Categories
503:Hi Kudpung
481:notable.--
451:Steve11oct
405:photograph
77:Stub-class
463:Selly Oak
483:Kudpung
433:Kudpung
431:days.--
292:on the
251:England
242:England
195:England
170:on the
517:Weoley
513:Weoley
83:scale.
409:added
401:image
270:Start
529:talk
487:talk
471:talk
437:talk
30:Tip:
407:be
403:or
377:???
284:Low
162:Low
549::
531:)
489:)
477:)
473:)
439:)
535:)
527:(
485:(
469:(
435:(
385:.
296:.
174:.
89::
49:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
