244:
Article leaves me hanging a bit - I feel it need a little more context in relation to other genera, and to (dor)mouse evolution in general - is this particularly ancient? Do we have alot of mouse remains? A little? From reading this are these little guys about the same size as a dormouse? larger?
226:
Well, if it is a nomen dubium, we don't know what it is, so it seems inappropriate to redirect it here. The thing should eventually get its own article. It's not too unusual for fossils to disappear somewhere along the way, and dormouse teeth of a few millimeters are probably among the more likely
274:
Well, with species we often discuss genera and sometimes touch on discussing family of a critter in taxonomy. With genera, I think some general idea of where it lies in mouse taxonomy - I know nothing about mouse taxonomy so even a sentence or two of context, like "Fossil dormice date from the
265:. But I'm not sure how relevant that is to this article, which is only about one fossil genus and not about the history of dormice in general. I think the teeth are in the same general size class as the hazel dormouse, but as you imply there are no sources that actually make the comparison.
213:
If 'Pentaglis földváry' is likely a nomen dubium, maybe any it should ultimately be a redirect to here (?) - in which case, some notes on how it got lost would be good to add. Leaves me hanging..how did it get
138:
Well, there are multiple MN 4 records and only one from MN 5, so I think using plural for the one and singular for the other is logical. But there may well be a better way to phrase it.
279:
has someone been able to make a cladogram of the genera or are the remains to limited? Do the teeth suggest it is a typical member or an aberrant/very early offshoot?
196:
I just wrote an article on MN 4, and will do the same for MN 5. We should probably have an article on glirid dental nomenclature, but of course we don't.
66:
62:
142:
47:
39:
130:
The MN 4 records are placed in the species S. alpinus and the
Affalterbach population is classified as the species S. bolligeri.
336:
305:
168:
116:
96:
245:
smaller? If we don't have sources so be it - I do recognise we ain't going to get too much if teeth is all we have.
192:
I know redlinks are generally good, but there are quite a lot. Be nice to blue a few up. Not a deal-breaker but...
55:
17:
294:
That's good - even that little bit just gives the reader a bit of context which is very helpful I think.
261:. They were very common early on in Europe, but get rarer in the Miocene, when they are replaced by
257:
This isn't really ancient; dormice first appear in the early Eocene, about 30 million years before
330:
299:
162:
110:
90:
32:
347:
286:
266:
149:
326:
295:
277:
and that many fossil genera have been discovered (looking at the
Gliridae article) -
158:
106:
86:
350:
340:
309:
289:
269:
172:
152:
120:
100:
134:- looks funny with plural/singular. Be good to align one way or other.
262:
227:
candidates, especially when someone like
Kretzoi is near.
285:
Yeah, there's loads of them. I added a little on this.
74:
43:
281:sorry, just realised you had some material on that
8:
141:Maybe something like "in a single site in
105:Okay, here we go. I'll jot queries below.
7:
325:Okay - I think that's it. GA pass.
24:
1:
367:
351:21:36, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
341:21:30, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
310:21:30, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
290:21:12, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
270:11:13, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
173:21:28, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
153:21:13, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
121:09:33, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
101:09:33, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
346:Thanks for the review!
199:Looking better already.
18:Talk:Seorsumuscardinus
148:I tried a rewording.
230:Okay, I'll pay that.
157:Yeah, that's fine.
259:Seorsumuscardinus
358:
79:
70:
51:
366:
365:
361:
360:
359:
357:
356:
355:
60:
37:
31:
29:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
364:
362:
354:
353:
323:
322:
321:
320:
319:
318:
317:
316:
315:
314:
313:
312:
250:
249:
248:
247:
238:
237:
236:
235:
234:
233:
232:
231:
219:
218:
217:
216:
207:
206:
205:
204:
203:
202:
201:
200:
186:
185:
184:
183:
182:
181:
180:
179:
178:
177:
176:
175:
80:
28:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
363:
352:
349:
345:
344:
343:
342:
338:
335:
332:
328:
311:
307:
304:
301:
297:
293:
292:
291:
288:
284:
283:
282:
280:
273:
272:
271:
268:
264:
260:
256:
255:
254:
253:
252:
251:
246:
242:
241:
240:
239:
229:
228:
225:
224:
223:
222:
221:
220:
215:
211:
210:
209:
208:
198:
197:
195:
194:
193:
190:
189:
188:
187:
174:
170:
167:
164:
160:
156:
155:
154:
151:
147:
146:
144:
140:
139:
137:
136:
135:
132:
131:
127:
126:
125:
124:
123:
122:
118:
115:
112:
108:
103:
102:
98:
95:
92:
88:
85:
81:
78:
77:
73:
68:
64:
59:
58:
54:
49:
45:
41:
36:
35:
26:
19:
333:
324:
302:
278:
276:
258:
243:
212:
191:
165:
143:Affalterbach
133:
129:
128:
113:
104:
93:
83:
82:
75:
71:
57:Article talk
56:
52:
33:
30:
44:visual edit
84:Reviewer:
27:GA Review
337:contribs
327:Casliber
306:contribs
296:Casliber
214:lost....
169:contribs
159:Casliber
117:contribs
107:Casliber
97:contribs
87:Casliber
263:muroids
67:history
48:history
34:Article
348:Ucucha
287:Ucucha
275:eocene
267:Ucucha
150:Ucucha
76:Watch
16:<
331:talk
300:talk
163:talk
111:talk
91:talk
63:edit
40:edit
145:"?
339:)
308:)
171:)
119:)
99:)
65:|
46:|
42:|
334:·
329:(
303:·
298:(
166:·
161:(
114:·
109:(
94:·
89:(
72:·
69:)
61:(
53:·
50:)
38:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.