737:
due to taboo (in Qing
Dynasty, it was still taboo to write characters that were in the names of officials), both very probably fitting exactly with the pronunciations at that time. By the time the simpler variants were officially recognized by Japan, it is likely that they have been similarly in common use already. It seems highly unlikely that they borrowed from the Chinese pronunciations. The PRC standardization of this simplification didn't exist yet either.
187:
166:
84:
332:
22:
74:
53:
197:
714:
My
Japanese is terrible and my Mandarin is just okay, but I think that these are 形聲 characters in Chinese, and that the simplification is clearly based on the pronunciation of the right half (登 deng, 正 zheng, 丁 ding). So this is actually very similar to the On-pu based simplification in the preceding
582:
I have found that both 濠洲 and 豪州 have been used to write one of the
Japanese names for Australia (ごうしゅう, Gōshū). Now it appears that 豪州 is a simplified form of 濠洲 with the water radical omitted from each character, yet in the lists I have been able to find, neither 濠 nor 洲 are kyūjitai and neither 豪州
494:
It isn't explained whether there was any interaction between the developers of
Shinjitai and the developers of the simplified Chinese characters. It also should be explained how it is that some of the shinjitai are the same as the simplified Chinese characters--is it just coincidence, as well as the
736:
The simplification of these two words have existed long before standardizing
Mandarin to be the National Language (let alone Putonghua). 証 and 灯 have existed to be re-used as a simpler form of 證 and 燈 at least before Qing Dynasty in China. The first was likely chosen for convenience, and the second
545:
Are
Shinjitai used consistently? Why Kyūjitai is still in modern use in Japan? Kanji 国 is often used interchangeably with 國, 竜 with 龍 (and derivatives)? I don't think it's by mistake. It's quite different from simplified/traditional Chinese. It's just one or the other. The exception would be when
510:
To the best of my knowlwdge, there was no interaction whatsover. Bear in mind that both groups of people were working from a common base, and many of the simplifications had been around for centuries. I have seen a late 18th century publication by a French
Sinologist which listed sets of common
715:
paragraph, it's not like these are random replacements that just happened to use less strokes. Might be worth pointing out if anyone can find a source for that. (FWIW the simplification in the PRC is exactly the same for these two characters, except that the 言 radical was simplified as well.)
561:
Kyūjitai are today used in personal names/proper nouns, for stylistic reasons (eg archaicism), and in reproductions of historical texts. The main reasons Kyūjitai are still used in Japan is that they were not banned after the postwar reforms, and are still tolerated in personal names (see
683:
where it is referred to as 書きかえ (kakikae) but as it does not cover the case of 濠洲 and 豪州 it is obviously not complete. I think a separate article is warranted and preferably a complete table of such substitutions or at least a pointer to such a table existing elsewhere on the
Internet. —
609:
Could anybody provide an approximate timeline as to when each variant of Gōshū came into use, whether it was part of a standard or reform, if the process causing it has a name or
Knowledge (XXG) article, or list other terms or characters affected by the same mechanism? —
710:
In some cases a complex character was replaced to a simpler character that is neither a graphical variant nor shares an On reading, but had traditionally been used as a variant. Examples include 證 → 証 and 燈 → 灯,
599:
Is there another process similar to
Shinjitai where similar characters are used in place of characters not in Joyo? If so does it have a name or nickname and is it documented on Knowledge (XXG) or elsewhere?
546:
there are more than one contributor or the person doesn't know what is the correct version. Also, in Taiwan, some shortcuts are used: simplified: 台湾 but traditional allows both 臺灣 and 台灣. --
648:
419:
148:
818:
814:
800:
885:
138:
427:
895:
279:
348:
114:
880:
890:
596:
I see that both the forms without the water radical, 豪 and 州, are included in the Joyo kanji, but that the forms with the water radical, 濠 and 洲, are not.
465:
606:
My Windows XP IME includes both forms for ごう with 豪 before 濠 and both forms for しゅう with 州 before 洲, but for ごうしゅう it gives 豪州 as the only possibility.
340:
289:
378:
371:
110:
97:
58:
444:
398:
385:
900:
722:
230:
222:
738:
453:
796:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
665:
Thanks Ryoske. I've added a translation request for an English version of that article. At least if I did it right I have (-: —
33:
776:
234:
226:
210:
171:
861:
603:
Could it be a technology issue? Perhaps older Japanese fonts or encodings or IMEs included just the Joyo or Tojo kanji.
583:
are shinjitai. I think I have even seen a mixed form where one character has the water radical and the other does not.
495:
fact that both systems drew on cursive forms already in informal use? Thanks in advance for adding these explanations.
786:
817:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
403:
102:
39:
21:
726:
852:
768:
742:
718:
680:
836:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
824:
689:
670:
638:
615:
767:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
435:
531:
500:
238:
551:
516:
411:
821:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
837:
685:
666:
656:
634:
611:
567:
844:
777:
https://web.archive.org/web/20081218203648/http://www.sungwh.freeserve.co.uk/hanzi/j-s.htm
83:
186:
165:
803:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
527:
496:
331:
106:
105:
interested in improving the encyclopaedic coverage and content of articles relating to
89:
843:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
810:
874:
547:
512:
787:
https://web.archive.org/web/20140823074547/http://yurara.kir.jp/material/kanji.html
242:
202:
780:
652:
563:
809:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
647:
Being separate characters rather than shinjitai, these are rather examples of
192:
109:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by
79:
760:
790:
73:
52:
593:
Is this an undocumented case of shinjitai? Is it extended shinjitai?
216:
866:
746:
730:
693:
674:
660:
642:
619:
571:
555:
535:
520:
504:
586:
I assume that the character 濠 is related to its use in the old
15:
330:
771:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
526:
That's an interesting opinion, but one that is unsourced.
458:
764:
649:
non-Tōyō characters being replaced with Tōyō characters
324:
319:
314:
309:
250:
578:
Missing radicals in ateji synonyms but not shinjitai!
431:: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
237:. Current time in Japan: 20:32, September 11, 2024 (
214:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
813:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
590:for Australia, 濠太剌利 so 豪 must be the newer form.
511:simplifications, and many of the 新字体 were there.
229:, where you can join the project, participate in
781:http://www.sungwh.freeserve.co.uk/hanzi/j-s.htm
799:This message was posted before February 2018.
704:Simplifications based on Chinese pronunciation
8:
123:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Writing systems
19:
297:
160:
47:
759:I have just modified 2 external links on
221:on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to
791:http://yurara.kir.jp/material/kanji.html
625:I notice that both 洲 and 州 were used as
629:for す/ス/su but I cannot find 濠 or 豪 in
251:
162:
95:This article falls within the scope of
49:
886:Mid-importance Writing system articles
679:In fact this phenomenon is covered at
896:Mid-importance Japan-related articles
7:
208:This article is within the scope of
126:Template:WikiProject Writing systems
881:Start-Class Writing system articles
38:It is of interest to the following
891:Start-Class Japan-related articles
14:
763:. Please take a moment to review
681:Japanese_script_reform#Tōyō kanji
264:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Japan
195:
185:
164:
82:
72:
51:
20:
284:This article has been rated as
143:This article has been rated as
867:23:28, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
709:Use of variant character : -->
1:
694:14:09, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
675:09:32, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
661:07:52, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
643:04:48, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
620:04:07, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
572:09:17, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
301:WikiProject Japan to do list:
556:23:55, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
505:23:42, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
423:to articles that need them.
362:Featured content candidates
98:WikiProject Writing systems
917:
901:WikiProject Japan articles
830:(last update: 5 June 2024)
756:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
536:02:19, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
521:01:54, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
357:
290:project's importance scale
267:Template:WikiProject Japan
149:project's importance scale
747:17:44, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
731:21:38, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
296:
283:
180:
142:
67:
46:
459:Japanese Knowledge (XXG)
399:Good article nominations
113:and/or leave a query at
752:External links modified
129:Writing system articles
115:the project’s talk page
335:
270:Japan-related articles
28:This article is rated
334:
32:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
811:regular verification
457:an article from the
439:Japan-related stubs.
231:relevant discussions
801:After February 2018
469:unassessed articles
235:lists of open tasks
225:, please visit the
855:InternetArchiveBot
806:InternetArchiveBot
490:Explanation needed
445:requested articles
436:Improve and expand
428:Pages for Deletion
412:Godzilla Minus One
336:
34:content assessment
831:
721:comment added by
487:
486:
483:
482:
479:
478:
475:
474:
394:
393:
258:
219:-related articles
211:WikiProject Japan
159:
158:
155:
154:
908:
865:
856:
829:
828:
807:
733:
420:requested images
356:
355:
298:
272:
271:
268:
265:
262:
255:
253:
246:
205:
200:
199:
198:
189:
182:
181:
176:
168:
161:
131:
130:
127:
124:
121:
111:the project page
92:
87:
86:
76:
69:
68:
63:
55:
48:
31:
25:
24:
16:
916:
915:
911:
910:
909:
907:
906:
905:
871:
870:
859:
854:
822:
815:have permission
805:
769:this simple FaQ
754:
716:
706:
580:
543:
492:
329:
269:
266:
263:
260:
259:
249:
201:
196:
194:
174:
128:
125:
122:
120:Writing systems
119:
118:
107:writing systems
88:
81:
61:
59:Writing systems
29:
12:
11:
5:
914:
912:
904:
903:
898:
893:
888:
883:
873:
872:
849:
848:
841:
794:
793:
785:Added archive
783:
775:Added archive
753:
750:
705:
702:
701:
700:
699:
698:
697:
696:
677:
579:
576:
575:
574:
542:
539:
524:
523:
491:
488:
485:
484:
481:
480:
477:
476:
473:
472:
471:
470:
462:
449:
440:
432:
424:
415:
392:
391:
383:
376:
367:
366:
365:
354:
353:
349:A-class review
345:
328:
327:
322:
317:
312:
306:
303:
302:
294:
293:
286:Mid-importance
282:
276:
275:
273:
207:
206:
190:
178:
177:
175:Mid‑importance
169:
157:
156:
153:
152:
145:Mid-importance
141:
135:
134:
132:
94:
93:
90:Writing portal
77:
65:
64:
62:Mid‑importance
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
913:
902:
899:
897:
894:
892:
889:
887:
884:
882:
879:
878:
876:
869:
868:
863:
858:
857:
846:
842:
839:
835:
834:
833:
826:
820:
816:
812:
808:
802:
797:
792:
788:
784:
782:
778:
774:
773:
772:
770:
766:
762:
757:
751:
749:
748:
744:
740:
734:
732:
728:
724:
723:95.91.244.122
720:
712:
703:
695:
691:
687:
682:
678:
676:
672:
668:
664:
663:
662:
658:
654:
650:
646:
645:
644:
640:
636:
632:
628:
624:
623:
622:
621:
617:
613:
607:
604:
601:
597:
594:
591:
589:
584:
577:
573:
569:
565:
560:
559:
558:
557:
553:
549:
540:
538:
537:
533:
529:
522:
518:
514:
509:
508:
507:
506:
502:
498:
489:
468:
467:
463:
461:into English.
460:
456:
455:
450:
447:
446:
441:
438:
437:
433:
430:
429:
425:
422:
421:
416:
414:
413:
408:
406:
401:
400:
396:
395:
390:
388:
387:
381:
380:
374:
373:
368:
363:
360:
359:
358:
351:
350:
346:
343:
342:
338:
337:
333:
326:
323:
321:
318:
316:
313:
311:
308:
307:
305:
304:
300:
299:
295:
291:
287:
281:
278:
277:
274:
257:
254:
244:
240:
236:
232:
228:
224:
220:
218:
213:
212:
204:
193:
191:
188:
184:
183:
179:
173:
170:
167:
163:
150:
146:
140:
137:
136:
133:
116:
112:
108:
104:
100:
99:
91:
85:
80:
78:
75:
71:
70:
66:
60:
57:
54:
50:
45:
41:
35:
27:
23:
18:
17:
853:
850:
825:source check
804:
798:
795:
758:
755:
739:42.98.40.119
735:
717:— Preceding
713:
707:
630:
626:
608:
605:
602:
598:
595:
592:
587:
585:
581:
544:
525:
493:
464:
452:
443:
442:Create some
434:
426:
418:
410:
405:Vinland Saga
404:
397:
384:
377:
370:
369:
361:
347:
339:
285:
247:
227:project page
215:
209:
203:Japan portal
144:
96:
40:WikiProjects
686:Hippietrail
667:Hippietrail
635:Hippietrail
612:Hippietrail
562:article).--
541:Consistency
407:(TV series)
341:Peer review
223:participate
103:WikiProject
30:Start-class
875:Categories
862:Report bug
633:tables. —
631:man'yōgana
627:man'yōgana
233:, and see
845:this tool
838:this tool
761:Shinjitai
528:Badagnani
497:Badagnani
454:translate
851:Cheers.—
719:unsigned
548:Atitarev
513:JimBreen
379:Pictures
372:Articles
765:my edit
389:: None
382:: None
375:: None
315:history
288:on the
252:Refresh
147:on the
653:Ryoske
564:Ryoske
466:Assess
352:: None
344:: None
36:scale.
708:: -->
588:ateji
451:Help
386:Lists
325:purge
320:watch
261:Japan
243:Reiwa
217:Japan
172:Japan
743:talk
727:talk
690:talk
671:talk
657:talk
639:talk
616:talk
568:talk
552:talk
532:talk
517:talk
501:talk
417:Add
310:edit
101:, a
819:RfC
789:to
779:to
651:.--
280:Mid
245:6)
239:JST
139:Mid
877::
832:.
827:}}
823:{{
745:)
729:)
692:)
673:)
659:)
641:)
618:)
570:)
554:)
534:)
519:)
503:)
409:,
402::
364:–
241:,
864:)
860:(
847:.
840:.
741:(
725:(
688:(
669:(
655:(
637:(
614:(
566:(
550:(
530:(
515:(
499:(
448:.
292:.
256:)
248:(
151:.
117:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
