823:
be suspicious. Ms. Harlins was one of many victims of the racial tensions in LA. The Korean community can be blamed for setting up so many liquor stores in the ghettos and being "rude" to
African American customers. However, Korean's often had no choice but to set up shop in such places where no other racial groups would go. As for the common myth that immigrants receive more loans than inner city entrepreneurs, nothing could be further from the truth. Asian American entrepreneurs often get money from family abroad or save for decades working odd jobs in hopes of opening businesses. Koreans blaming African Americans and African Americans blaming Koreans is exactly how some would like the system to continue. Hopefully, some day, people will stop all this bickering and get to the real issues.
1744:"Giving due weight and avoiding giving undue weight means that articles should not give minority views as much of or as detailed a description as more widely held views." Du's version of events is indeed a minority view. It was not supported by the witnesses, it was not supported by the video tape, it was not accepted by the jury. The claim that the article is improved by inserting unspported allegations is a specious as the claims themself . This is particulary true when other important detail is currently not included, for example eyewitnesses description that the verbal confrontation was initiated by the perpetrator. NPOV does not require that a version of events very unlikely to be true be given equal mention.
2681:: "Soon Ja Du, her face beginning to swell and discolor from the four punches Harlins landed." My use of the word "altercation" was to use a neutral description as prescribed by Knowledge policy, a reasonable edit that resulted from your comments. A more accurate description would be "punching Du in the face four times and knocking her down." The second description would not be an interpretation, it would be a fact corroborated by multiple sources. If you would like to omit the video, which shows Harlins punching Du in the face four times and knocking her down, then that would be fine. But you should definitely indicate such an event happened, otherwise you're creating a falsehood through omission.
1233:, several users have used this page to express the opinion that Harlins deserved to die or that her death is somewhat less tragic because she was stealing. This idea, weak to begin with, becomes totally useless once one realizes that she WASN'T stealing, and one realizes this soon after beginning to read the article. Of course, those expressing this opinion are of the anonymous hit and run type, who can't be bothered with reading the text or the links. So I'm creating this section for them to speak their anger and ignorance, and so those wanting a real discussion don't have to be disturbed with their useless opinions.
1983:
text can and should be improved, and the tags bring attention to the fact. You seem to be assuming a lot of thing, like what other editors need to read, while ignoring your own behavior on this issue, which indeed is coming close to assuming ownership of this article. You've tried to dismiss this notion by mentioning that you've only recently edited the article, and that in fact is part of the issue. These tags have been in existence over a year with several other editors not seeing the need for removal, while you've repeatedly and insistently deleted them without opening on talk page discussion.
2335:
are not binding, as I show of good faith I will respect the opinion that I, in following recommended practices, willingly sought, and will not seek further dispute resolution. I have inserted more cited text which addresses my concerns about specificity while retaining the longstanding if somewhat inelegant wording some are apparently wedded to. As I believe this sentence and indeed the article in general can use improvement, I will continue to seek additional sources with more detailed info than what has been presented thus far, although if all edits are this arduous I may need to rethink this
2729:
Harlins died (i.e., shot in the head). I believe one of
Grayfell's points is that if we start adding some details (like Harlins punching Du twice) but not others (Du calling Harlins a bitch, accusing her of stealing, initiating the altercation by grabbing her, throwing her chair at her, knocking the bottle off the counter after Harlins picked it up off the floor and put it there, shooting Harlins in the back of the head when Harlins saw the gun and turned around to leave), then we begin to slant the lead's summary by emphasizing points favorable to one party at the expense of the other.
912:
minute if it was me the person behind the counter getting the crap beat out of me by a 15 year knowing that I have been stolen from call names in my place of business. Everyday being told how you gonna kill me by adults. It's like being in a war zone And now a child comes in and starts this same vicious cycle not only with words but with a physical beating what would you do.What I Think was wrong The Korea store owner shot her from behind as she was walking away. If she was going to put a gun it should done during the fight and it would have been seen more justifiable.
388:
511:
493:
2275:
below, and to make accusations of a 3rRR violation which have applied to you as much as anyone else. If you were in fact interested in solving problems, you would have addressed my concerns about specificity and not repeatedly attacked the straw man that was about a direct source by improving the vague article text with details contained in the link which you are implying solves all problems. In fact, there is a discrepancy between the wiki article and the source, one which has evidently eluded your problem solving self.
1940:"numerous...businesses" are not desirable in Knowledge. The rationale, weak as it is, given for retaining this phrasing is that it is cited, but not only is this not obvious, because there are no direct links to the sources, it is of dubious relevance. The fact that sources use this language is no reason we can not try to IMPROVE on the phrasing per Wiki's manual of style. Keeping the templates that have been inserted and have been in existence for quite some time are the best method of bring attention to this issue.
2045:"Numerous" is not a quantity, hence the tag. Is numerous thirty, three thousand, something in between, or something else? WHICH activists and members of the community reached the conclusion stated? The fact that the text MAY accurately reflect the sources is no reason why we should remain satisfied with the existing text, and tagging the text in the manner done is the correct method of bring other editors attention to these issues. If this means other sources needs to be found, than so be it.
2307:"some members" or "numerous...businesses" are not necessarily weasel words. Weasel words are used to obfuscate, but that's not what's happening here. The sentence in question might be rewritten slightly to improve the clarity and quality of the prose, but it's also fine as it stands. The source provided does indeed support the assertion that Korean businesses were targeted in the riots, and also provides an example of how some people saw a connection to the death of Latasha Harlins.
2722:
juice, after which Du grabbed
Harlins sweater, after which Harlins punched Du twice in the eye, at which point Du fell down with Harlins backpack, dislodging the orange juice which fell on the floor, after which Du got up and threw her chair at Harlin, after which Harlin picked up the orange juice bottle and put it back on the counter, after which Du knocked the bottle away, after which point Harlins turned around to leave, at which point Du shot Harlins in the back of the head.
1389:
2639:. Do not use your own interpretation of the video, and then "backfill" with whatever sources you find via Google. This will only support your own interpretation, which defeats the purpose of citing reliable, independent sources. Yes, sources discuss the incident in detail. But that doesn't mean you get to pick-and-choose which details belong in the lead, and which do not, based on your own interpretation of a grainy video hosted on youtube.
320:
3083:
Yes, of course my review of the video is not backed by a secondary source, but I believe the current edit of this article does not back Du has thrown a stool either. Multiple previous talks have also mentioned she might have thrown the backpack instead of the stool. But of course, it is 4:50 in the morning, I was on a hankering to get to what I believe is a decent study for the tape of the killing, and I am all out of time for now.
299:
32:
209:
188:
1323:
store merchandise into your back pack. You tell them "Sorry about that, I am going to buy this, I should have got a shopping basket". The article is written pretty POV for the dead girl. She didn't deserve to die for stealing juice, but from the sounds of it she assaulted the older/smaller shop owner quite viciously (probably something she'd been through before) and obviously felt extremely theatened to take retribution.
219:
118:
100:
567:
1785:, you will note it is reference to tiny minorities. One half of a court case is not a tiny minority. You will find it universally accepted to print what the defence argues or testifies in a trial on Knowledge. The amount of coverage of Du's testimony is not large enough to warrant cutting or trimming. It is not overly detailed and is immediately contrasted by what the multiple other parties state.
69:
861:
regardless of whether
Harlins had cash on hand (I can still shoplift while holding money) and within her rights to control the movement of her merchandise until it was sold. This is why Harlins should not have introduced her bag as a barrier to DJ's mercy. The civilized response upon having the bag grabbed is to offer the money for the juice, not assault the shopkeeper.
2363:"Not an especially egregious example" is not worth making an issue out of. What you've overlooked, perhaps intentionally, is that this is the FIRST issue the uninvolved editor decided to address and did so without any prompting. The request for a third comment did not mention it, the editor saw it in prior discussion and saw fit to comment on, and to dismiss, it.
419:
3028:
1882:
2617:"Latasha Harlins (July 14, 1975 â March 16, 1991) was a 15-year-old African-American girl who was shot in the head by Soon Ja Du (Hangul:ììë), a 51-year-old Korean-born female convenience store owner, after punching Du in the face four times and knocking her down. Du was tried and convicted of voluntary manslaughter in Harlins' death."
128:
2715:" (I see this Knowledge article mistakenly says "three times", so I will correct that to read "two times" on my next edit.) After reading the court record and thinking about expanding the lead with the full details of the incident, I suppose a much more accurate version in full context would read something like this:
1361:"placing" sounds rather delicate. Do you want a gif of how the juice was left? Money in hand doesn't make intent to pay a safe assumption. As above that is an easy out if caught. Many caught for petty theft would rather pay than get criminal charges but this doesn't insert a desire to pay prior to being caught.
1657:"but her words were contradicted by the statements of the two witnesses present at the time and the security camera footage". Accurate phrasing. The videotape and the witness show that the victim came to the counter holding money and that the physical confrontation was initiated by the perpetrator.
2839:
I concur with using "fatally shot" in place of the more gruesome "shot in the head" in the first sentence of the lead. It would still tell the reader what they need to know in a dispassionate way, while the expanded content in the body provides the comprehensive and more evocative details in play by
2807:
edit (which you restored multiple times) included the word "altercation". You proposed changing this to be more detailed, and more harsh towards the victim, but your edits indicated which information you wanted to highlight. How we explain this event in the article is what needs to be debated, but it
2366:
You are correct that I don't concur with the third opinion, but it is opinion, and not fact. Furthermore, as you may not be aware of, third opinions need not be final or binding, there are other steps that can follow. However, you would presumably reject any attempt at a RFC as ludicrous and refuse
1570:
Most of the narrative in the section "Summary" does not follow NPOV guidelines. The section says that it is a summary of the court case, but it is clearly not. The summary section uses language like "Du erroneously concluded" and " who falsely claimed having been robbed". I think this section should
1477:
I understand why you added the citations back, but all the information that the original citations refer to is obtainable through the court transcript. I deleted the citations to the articles, because the articles which the citations refer to have very sensational titles, favoring
Harlins' side over
1433:
I am undoing several edits made today by an IP user. This has very little to do with the facts in the edits, but more to do with no sources given. From the articles I read none of the facts asserted by this editor were ever established. I could easily be wrong. If reliable sources can be provided
1189:
I've done that in the past and I've also seen people eat an item before paying for it. I lived across the country in
Baltimore, but experiences were similar. Latasha could have stolen in the past, but on this day, she had $ 2 in her hand preparing to pay and she placed the juice on the counter before
971:
This is clearly biased, due to the phrasing. "Du was easily overcome and at just 115 lbs. she was certainly unable to push the street brawl hardened 150 plus pound
Latasha off of her." The entire article gives only the perspective of an Asian storekeeper who's victim. What about the fact that she was
860:
far as I understand it, Du only used her hands to grab
Harlins' bag after Harlins put the juice in her bag without paying for it. I bring a bag when I buy milk but I always put the milk on the counter and complete the transaction before I put it in my bag. Du was right to suspect theft in seeing that
822:
The division of the blame in this case is not between that of two specific people. Understanding the circumstances in which the murder was committed blame goes to both the
African American and Korean Communities. Other African Americans had stolen from Du's store previously and so she had reason to
752:
That is what she said so she wouldn't be jailed for life for second degree murder. But this is what the police said 2 days after at a press conference: "Du was arrested
Saturday afternoon on suspicion of murder, Bostic said, just hours after she was treated at a hospital for what Bostic described as
662:
The title is also totally wrong (bias?) It states judge sentenced Soon Ja Du to "time served". She was actually sentenced to 10 years in prison (suspended sentence), 5 years probation, a $ 500 fine + all costs associated with Latasha's funeral, and 400 hours community service. If anyone wants to edit
2906:
The specific fixes to this page that are necessary: (1) Why is the assault, fight, or altercation not mentioned in the heading section? This has already been asked by various other posters on the talk page to no avail. (2) It's not often you get a video of exactly what happened. Many other wikipedia
2384:
I must tell you that I quite literally laughed out loud at your suggestion that I devote my time to something other than edit warring. I found that suggestion, coming from an IP editor who explicitly admitted to gaming WP:3RR (which you did, both on this talkpage and in an edit summary) really quite
2334:
Keihatsu, thank you for responding to my request and I'm glad to see that you acknowledge that the fact bombing claim was without merit (those must be pretty powerful tags if just two in article qualify as a bombing). I'm less enthusiastic with your analysis and while we all know that third opinions
2320:
Thanks for taking the time. This entire experience has been pretty surreal, as neither attempt (I first created one tag that asked for a specific page from the off-line cite before finally digging around until I was able to find a direct link to it) I made to fix the issue the IP claimed to have was
2274:
If you were in fact interested in solving problems, then YOU would have initiated talk page dialogue, and YOU would have requested a third opinion. Instead, you decided to deal in imperatives and to make an baseless accusations and an empty threat about tag bombing, a notion which has been rejected
2241:
I see you're abandoning the empty tag bomb threat now that I called you on it and and are now trying a 3 RR ploy. Talk about gaming the system. You have my congrats on finding a source, now let's see if it and you can address the valid concerns my tags raised. I could repeat the concerns here but
2044:
In your latest reply, you completely ignored what was shown that phrasing such as "some activists and members of the community" is the very first example given in WP:WEASEL of vague phrasing. You also ignored what was shown regarding the quantify tag being used for terms that need quantification.
1982:
The very first example in WP:WEASEL is 'some people say'. The quantify tag specifically states a term needs quantification, and 'numerous' is such a term. Again, even if this is an accurate reflection of the material, and again this is not obvious since there is no direct links to the source, the
1509:
That may be the case, but I would think sources would always be welcome, if they are reliable. However, as a compromise, I offer this. All inline cites can be removed and put in the external references section. Cite 4 can be removed because its title is somwhat sensationalized, cites 1,2,8 and 10
1346:
The store owner put herself in harms way, but she was trying to prevent stealing. But where I'm from, the store owner would scream out to you before approaching you, especially if you towered over them. They'd rather lose $ 2 in merchandise than to lose their life. Since Latasha died with $ 2 in her
1046:
Agreed with the merger idea. Definitely think that "Death of . . ." or even "Killing of . . ." would be a better title. Whether voluntary manslaughter is truly the same as second-degree murder is a subtle legal point that in truth would vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction even within the United
1034:
It seems like a waste of space to have the two when they don't go into the actual lives of the two individuals, and all we know about them stems from this one incident. I'm not entirely sure what the new article should be called - I'm trying to find an article which was titled after an incident with
727:
You are wrong Ride, Latisha punches Du viciously in the video. So vicious that Du falls to the ground, Du would later pass out from the blows. From news coverage back then, video showed Du with severe bruising from the attack. Yes, Latisha was 15, but she was 150 lbs and nearly 6' tall up against an
2613:
Also, as to the video of the incident. Since it is a primary source, Knowledge policy holds that "ny interpretation of primary source material requires a reliable secondary source for that interpretation." I think you agree that the LA Times and a published book are both reliable secondary sources.
2858:
I do not object to that change, but I agree that the specific details should not be expanded in the lead without much more caution and discussion. There are many reasons we need to be careful not to blame black shooting victims, even if inadvertently. Knowledge cannot ignore this context and still
2753:
It seems like Grayfell's argument, which you may or may not support, is that the only possible and fair lead to this Knowledge article is the current version, which excludes all details except "shot in the head," or absolutely every detail in the entire case. My counter-argument to this particular
2684:
It's interesting also, that you're focusing on the word "altercation" when it doesn't appear in the proposed edit, which is a straw-man argument. It's something I'd like the administrator to note. See above: ("Latasha Harlins (July 14, 1975 â March 16, 1991) was a 15-year-old African-American girl
2260:
be tag-bombing, especially given that they have been rendered completely meritless by the fact that your concerns about having no direct link to the source have been addressed. The 3RR thing is so blatant, given your comment above as well as your edit summary, that I have little doubt that your IP
2067:
The "page number" tag is not a "fool's errand." It's a request for a page number in the current sourcing, to verify the claims made in the sentence. It replaces two tags that clutter the article unnecessarily, and basically asks for the same thing that those TWO tags ostensibly are requesting. Did
1815:
The example you have give regarding a twice repeated phrase, namely African American, is hardly the same as omitting crucial, accurate words such as 'erroneous' regarding a conclusion and 'alleged' regarding a supposed criminal act. Your self congratulation on improving prose are opinion which may
911:
This is all very sad a life was taken and another was distroyed. I was living in Los Angeles at the time this was going on and the video clearly shows the beautiful young life of Latsaha Harlins beating the crap out of the Korean store keeper. Now no one deserves to shot period but I think for one
3082:
Hi, So I understand this might bring my personal biases to the table, but my personal review of the video suggests that Du did not throw a stool, but that Latasha attempted to get the backpack, failed, Du pulled the backpack behind the counter then threw it at her. I don't think it was a stool.
2721:
Latasha Harlins was a 15-year-old African-American girl who was fatally shot by Soon Ja Du, a 51-year-old Korean-born female convenience store owner, after Du accused Harlins of stealing a bottle of orange juice and called Harlins a "bitch", after which Harlins said she intended to pay for orange
2349:
As I anticipated, you have interpreted "not an especially egregious example of" as "not an example of." I also anticipated that you wouldn't like the fact that the wording you took issue with wasn't "weasel wording" since it wasn't intended to obfuscate. I do tend to agree that the entire article
1833:
Regarding minority views, Knowledge is under no obligation to present a defense brief, particulary one that is not accepted by a jury. The discredited claim of self defense is already present in the article. Furthermore, the defense position is indeed a tiny minority. It was not supported by any
1766:
When you read the text you will note the information is still there in the next sentence, it is just not duplicated. The information is not omitted and the detail is maintained if the reader simply reads the next sentence. This is perfectly acceptable for prose and desirable as shown in the link.
1403:
u r an idiot she didnt leave with the merchandise she put it down and started to walk out..and thats not self-defense, Harlins was walking away the Bitch pulled some pussy shit and shot her in the head because she got her ass beat...and then she ran to Korea, she deserves to be thrown in jail and
1243:
Du, a tiny elderly woman, used her hands to grab Harlin's backpack. As the storekeeper, she had a right to do that if she suspected shoplifting. And the girl WAS concealing merchandise. Du never tried to hit her, but Harlin wailed on the old woman. She was assaulted in her own store and in my
2194:
Why would I apologize to you when you've been assuming bad faith since the beginning? And are you assuming the other editor is male? I saw nothing that indicated gender, but I didn't look because it's not important. Now as far as your typical imperative "Don't readd them", you don't have to fret
2040:
The fact that tags tags have existed for so long are evidence that other users have seen them and did not see fit to remove them. The fact the issues they raise have not been addressed is no reason to remove them. Would we remove a 'citation needed' tag or a 'who' tag after a year because they
1322:
You don't put something into your back pack if you intend on paying for it. The money may have been a ruse if she was confronted, to say she was going to pay for it. If you were going to pay for it, you don't start punching someone smaller than you when they come up and point out that you've put
2728:
While that phrasing would provide full context, however, that's way too much detail to put into the lead, which is just supposed to be a summary of the article's topic. The long standing version of the lead is much simpler and includes only a single detail from the physical confrontation: how
2712:
Defendant began pulling on Latasha's sweater in an attempt to retrieve the orange juice from the backpack. Latasha resisted and the two struggled. Latasha hit defendant in the eye with her fist twice. With the second blow, defendant fell to the floor behind the counter, taking the backpack with
2705:
Note that Professor Stevens is incorrect when she says four punches landed, perhaps because she based her interpretation of the incident from watching the same grainy black and white video. Harlin moves her arm four times in the footage after Du grabs her, but only two of the swings physically
2642:
So no, I do not accept that this is appropriate for the lead of the article. According to sources, this child did many things before being killed by an adult, but it isn't up to use to tell an evocative story. The lead isn't the place to explain the "altercation", and it isn't clear that it was
2096:
Why do you assume I NEED to read it, which would imply that I'm not already familiar with it? I know it says that editors who continue to do so may be blocked if they persist after being warned. So if you REALLY feel that I am doing this, maybe you want to bring it up on the vandalism page.
1586:
Actually, the summary is pretty accurate. The wording could have been a bit better but it does tell the truth. Du, unfortunately, lied about being robbed (Harlins never took money from the register). Harlins only had two dollars in her hands and there was still money in Du's cash register.
2400:
No, thank you for continuing to showcase your lack of reading comprehension. I don't know whether this is done deliberately or through simple lack of ability, but no matter. I wish I could laugh at your shortcomings , but, unlike you, I'm here to assist in the project, not for laughs
1788:
You have not addressed why you have continually reinserted statements not supported by the citation like "Paramedics soon arrived" and removed information such as "at a distance of about three feet" despite it following the police reports and not being related at all to Du's testimony.
2754:
line of logic is that including one gruesome detail, and excluding any other detail is the definition of bias. To use your words, this slants the lead's summary, especially when one detail isn't balanced by another, inhibiting Knowledge's policy of unbiased, neutral, and fair editing.
1939:
Although I have little reason to believe that someone who would shout "STOP IT NOW" has the ability or desire to engage in productive dialogue, I for one will attempt to follow wiki protocol by initiating talk page discussion. Phrases that have weasel words such as "some members" and
1258:
Just in case you ever work in the retail industry, you don't have a right to grab a customer or their things, even if you suspect wrongdoing. You can always ASK to look in their bag etc., but they might say no, in which case you can't really do anything. - 15:03, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
2048:
You've further mentioned a 'tag after the sources requesting that they be clarified with a quote attached' without specify what that you would be. I hope this is not the tag you've used in your 'compromise' edit. Determining the page number on which this material exists is a fool's
2161:
Why would you apologize to him? It was MY comment you deleted, simply because you weren't paying attention, and thought you were reverting my 1-tag-for-2 compromise. Anyway, after digging around a bit, I found a link to the Daily News article that's still active. It supports (as I
2104:
Finally, there is no reason for you to conclude that I feel direct links are REQUIRED. However, if it were available, it would make it easier for ALL editors to examine the material and paraphrase it in the most desirable manner. I've already mentioned this is by previous reply
2569:. All disputable interpretations of sources must come from reliable, secondary sources. Presenting this as an "altercation" is editorializing, when the video merely shows their actions, including that Harlins was shot in the back of the head while walking away from the counter.
1717:
You claim that all of the information is intact, but you are in fact omitting relevant information as I have detailed above. For example, Du's conclusion was indeed erroneous, as confirmed by the police. There is no valid rationale to eliminate this word, it is an important
2033:
My main issue is with your continued comments like 'you don't understand tagging at all' and 'the tags were placed in error 'in which you continue to display behavior that indicates that you feel your editing skills and wiki knowledge exceeds those editors that disagree with
2881:
Agreed, the lead in this situation works best without going into any expanded details about the altercation, which are inherently susceptible to selective emphasis (consciously or unconsciously) to "frame" the situation to advocate a certain point of view. Regards,
1281:
She probably planned on stealing it, noticed she was seen, and pulled the money out to cover for her actions. She still attempted to leave the store without paying. So drop the snotty sarcasm, people . . . it doesn't help and cases like this are not cut and dried.
1051:
that there's no substantive difference, and that "murder" is therefore just as appropriate a word. But it isn't Knowledge's place to make such an argument. So, since Soon Ja Du was not convicted of murder, a "Murder of . . ." title definitely should not be used.
782:
I saw the video on a PBS program on the L.A. Riots, and Latasha immediately throws punches upon being confronted. The punches seemed powerful to me as evidenced by Du's head recoiling after each blow. And to the police, bruising, even severe bruising is considered
2052:
I would welcome on this talk page a direct link to the material so ALL editors can see what is in the source and to attempt to come up with a phrasing that eliminates the problems I've shown while remaining faithful to its citation, so let's see what you've got.
2801:, is that a child was shot in the back of the head while walking away from a fight she didn't start. These are the immutable facts, put very bluntly, and talk pages can be used for discussing the facts in blunt language, if the purpose is to improve the article.
2772:
Sidenote: Well, the impetus behind "Korean-born" seems to be to denote the subject was born in a foreign country. Thus Korea-born or Foreign-born seemed more accurate. But if the court record said "Korean-born," I concede it makes more sense to stick with it.
2005:
it. The tags were placed in error one year ago, I happened to notice them pretty recently, and removed them, explaining in the edit summary why they were unnecessary. If you have an issue with the sources not being directly accessible--and it sounds like that
1834:
other objective third party evidence. It is unsupported claims by a defendant. More critical information, such as the testimony of the witness that the verbal confrontation was initiated by the perpetrator, continues to be absent from this article.
2685:
who was shot in the head by Soon Ja Du (Hangul:ììë), a 51-year-old Korean-born female convenience store owner, after punching Du in the face four times and knocking her down. Du was tried and convicted of voluntary manslaughter in Harlins' death.")
1614:
Did you read any of the cites? "Slain girl was not stealing juice, police say." reads the footnote that is part of the excerpt you've copied above. This section is not MAKING conclusions, it's repeating the conclusions of the police and the jury.
2796:
if you do so. The idea that having a "political motivation" somehow disqualifies me, or anyone else, from editing is misguided. We all have opinions, and we all have biases. It is pointless to pretend otherwise. What I am describing here, on the
2676:
As much as I respect your opinion, your argument doesn't make a lot of sense. Research is research. The Los Angeles Times is a reputable source. So is a published book. So is a research paper from the University of Chicago that you can see here
1391:(despite that page's prominent "reproduction prohibited" notice). Regrettably, the most recent revision I could find lacking the plagiarized text was from way back in December. I reverted it to be safe. Just thought I should explain myself. --
2907:
articles link to videos, so why remove them in this case? Why not just reformat the link? (3) There are a lot of run on sentences that should be split into two sentences, grammatical and other errors. Yet these edits too are reverted. Why?
2134:
It's very telling that you initially reverted my comment here without edit summary. It displays very clearly that you've dug into your position in such a way that you're simply reverting me without even bothering to check what you've done.
1035:
a similar background - Would this be a precedent? As voluntary manslaughter is still murder by definition, it could be called "Murder of Latasha Harlins," but I'm sure someone wants think of something that sounds "less biased." (
1651:"Du erroneously concluded". The title of citation 5 states "Slain girl was not stealing juice, Police say". Since the victim was not stealing it is correct to characterize the perpertrators conclusion as 'erroneous'.
1971:, in fact, adequately sourced. As for the use of capital letters, given your continual reversion of nonsense tags, I thought perhaps you weren't even reading the edit summaries explaining why the tags were inappropriate.
2227:
has been noted (and, ironically enough, recorded by you in an actual edit summary), and you will be reported for 3RR if you again do a blind revert readding those tags after your request for a direct link was addressed.
2962:
I'm sure the jury really recommended the maximum sentence, but none of the citations actually say this. I've also been unable to find the jury recommendation online. Can someone post a link so we can properly cite it?
579:
997:
What is this rubbish about the witnesses being less reliable because they are "black youths"? What racist trash! This article is an embarassment to the reputation of Knowledge. -p1nkfl0yd 01:23, 03 May 2009 (UTC)
1864:. Subject is notable primarily for the incident in which she died. The article focuses on the incident, the aftermath, and the legacy, with substantial space dedicated to Du's trial, and the effect on the culture.
1103:
would be a far better title; the current article doesn't actually tell us anything about Harlins other than her name, age, race, and the fact she was a student. It's really about the incident rather than herself.
2757:
I think your source from the case is a perfect place to start looking for a proper description. The following quote pulled from the case seems to get the gist of the situation while keeping the language neutral:
1654:"to report an alleged holdup". No holdup happened. Therefore, it was alleged, not actual. This phrasing is certainly better than describing the claim as a lie, which is certainly possible although not proven.
2100:
Furthermore, your cite DOESN'T ask for the same thing. My tags ask WHICH activists are making the claim and HOW MANY business were being affected, you are simply asking for where in the source the material was
1727:
Furthermore, you claim that your version 'improves the prose' by removing redundant words, but your version indulges in its own redundancy by twice mentioning that Du claim that Harlins had threatened to kill
1298:
100% self defense. Du shouldn't have even received the probation. Latasha Harlins didn't deserve to die but deserve the reaction from an elderly store owner who probably never experience what she experienced.
1180:
yes. She was absolutely, positively going to steal it. Pulling the money out of her pocket was a dead giveaway. Obviously people who have money in hand plan on stealing and should be punished with a shotgun.--
2768:
Pardon the interaction between me and Grayfell, his initial accusations of "white-washing" and numerous opinionated reversions seemed to indicate a political motivation which lead to my curt tone with him.
1675:
1532:
Does anyone know what has happened to Soon Ja Du? Did she end up going back to Korea? Does she still run a liquor store? A followup would be nice I can't find anything online but I will keep looking.
2635:
There are a lot of reasons that video is not appropriate by itself. That you are only now looking for secondary sources is a problem. Please look at what reliable sources are saying and summarize that
2688:
It's also interesting that you believe "punched Du in the face" is evocative, but "shot in the head" is not evocative. It's an obvious double standard, and should also be noted by the administrator.
1631:
Saying you were robbed doesn't automatically mean you are saying cash was stolen. It can also refer to merchandise. Harlins stole the juice soon as it passed her zipper regardless of what cops say.
2935:. What appears to be an error to you may not be an error to other editors. Normally, I would suggest making incremental edits which fix uncontroversial edits, but since you have already surpassed
2370:
I don't know where I said or implied that the entire article could use a rewrite, portions of it are well done, If you feel as such maybe you can devote your time to that instead of edit warring.
622:
says she was convicted of voluntary manslaughter. The vast majority of web references say voluntary manslaughter, including a court transcript, so this page is probably the one that is wrong.
2350:
could use a rewrite, and the wording in this section is particularly awkward. Be that as it may, the article is less tag-cluttered now, and has been slightly improved over its previous state.
2261:
will be blocked from editing should you make even one more bare revert. All along, I've been looking for a way to solve problems here. You've done nothing but obstruct every step of the way.
1347:
hand, it's safe to assume that she was going to pay. Also, Latasha proceeded to leave the store after placing the juice on the counter, so it's safe to assume she wasn't going to steal.
2018:) with a tag after the sources requesting that they be clarified with a quote attached, or with a direct link that verifies their content. But dropping two tags on innocuous wording is
409:
753:"superficial injuries" she sustained in the scuffle." There is hardly blame to be divided. Du was in a tough situation that many of us would have also failed. But it was her crime.
1771:
the 44th and current President of the United States. He is the first African American to hold the office." is analogous and you can see there is no loss or omission of information.
1674:
If you read the text you will see that all of the information is intact and no information is removed. Redundant words have been removed which improves the prose. Please read "
3146:
3037:
It turns out that she was indeed 15 when she died, but she was born in 1976, not 1975. For over a decade, the article actually stated that she was born on July 14, 1975
1119:
It's better than the current title but even 'Death' isn't completely descriptive. Harlins was shot and killed in a criminal act. A correct title should mention this.
475:
465:
2083:
Also, you seem to believe that direct links to sources are required by Knowledge. They're not. The reason for that is because often no direct links are even available.
3156:
38:
2415:
Your lack of civility is noted. I teach English, so I don't think a lack of reading comprehension is a problem on my part. You are now simply reverting out of spite.
2147:
It's even more telling that you didn't bother to research that I apologized for my error to the editor who reverted my accidental deletion, who graciously accepted.
1816:
not be universal, indeed others may prefer the more compact wording. Furthermore, you continue to falesly claim that you are not removing information when you are.
846:
You left out one very important word in your sentence. Harlins immediately throws punches upon being PHYSICALLY confronted. It was Du who first used her hands.
2515:
Consensus? I understand you desire to be neutral, but users who maintain that a killing which resulted in a standing criminal conviction is lawful are trolling.
2209:
I further notice that you've concluded I'm a male. As the lawyers say, 'assumes facts not in evidence". Which is a pretty apt summary of your editing so far.
720:
Since when did she punch the owner? I've seen the video. She didn't even steal anything, as best I can remember. The owner was just acting on a stereotype.
3141:
2458:
As "mike" well knows, not all killings are legal. There was a criminal conviction in this case. The court documents refer to the killing as being unlawful.
3151:
1959:. The words you keep tagging are not "weasel words." They are accurate descriptions of what the source at the end of the sentence substantiates. Please read
3161:
3121:
1154:
Who in the world puts an item IN their backpack, and then goes to pay for it. I doubt that girl was going to pay for anything, probably going to steal it.
441:
281:
271:
2195:
about that. Not for today, anyway. I will be taking a break, but it has nothing to do with your demands. I suggest you stop directing other editors.
2651:
the altercation. This would also gloss-over the important detail of who started the altercation, which according to police etc. was, Du, not Harlins.
595:
2763:
Latasha Harlins was a 15-year-old African-American girl who was fatally shot by Soon Ja Du, a 51-year-old Korean-born female convenience store owner.
2181:
And now you've reverted my addition of the direct link you've supposedly been wanting all along. You need to take a break from this article, 24.187.
3126:
2812:
in the lead. You made your intentions clear enough, but using after-the-fact sources doesn't justify these changes, because all sources are judged
3111:
2501:
Because the edit warring is still continuing and you don't seem to be anywhere near consensus, I have made a request for another full protection.
1160:
146:
432:
393:
3136:
2732:
On a separate note, I'd like to ask, why was "Korean-born" replaced with "foreign-born"? What was the rationale behind that change? Regards,
2604:
625:
It states Latasha 'threw' the orange bottle on the counter. The cctv film shows Latasha handing over the bottle, she doesn't throw the bottle.
370:
360:
1266:
979:
247:
3116:
2474:
2431:
2402:
2371:
2336:
2276:
2243:
2210:
2196:
2148:
2106:
2054:
1984:
1941:
1920:
1790:
1700:
1415:
1330:
1230:
150:
2816:. Your eagerness to rush to "the admins" is also premature, to put it mildly, and for now you will have to work with me on the talk page.
1774:
You correctly note the redundant phrasing. I have correct the issue. In the future if you see something that can be improved or a problem
3166:
3106:
3011:
1511:
1463:
1164:
847:
799:
744:
647:
2041:
haven't been resolved? No we wouldn't. So your claim that the length of time they've been there is evidence for removal is unfounded.
1767:
Removing "an African American and" in the phrase "Barack Hussein Obama II (Listeni/bÉËrÉËk huËËseɪn oÊËbÉËmÉ/; born August 4, 1961) is
972:
convincted, with two witnesses against her? Shouldn't more information be provided on that? And how about a neutral perspective? ~Ako
1555:
She moved to a more rural part of California with her husband, not sure if she's dead now though since she should be in her eighties.
1540:
1306:
1283:
1245:
1005:
154:
145:, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Knowledge's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
3062:
Thank you for pointing this out, and apologies to the Wikipedians who have tried to do the right thing over the last 10 years. --
527:
336:
232:
193:
3131:
2987:
1434:
that would verify the edits, by all means revert me. I will be leaving a similar message on that editor's talk page. Thanks.
141:
105:
2792:
You are free to dismiss my motives because you disagree with my conclusions, but please don't pretend that your comments are
1603:
954:
this article is biased and is only up here because of the supposed 'hate crime'. i think we should put this up for deletion.
1459:
I've reinserted several citations that were deleted without explanation. Verifiability is an import part of Knowledge, see
2572:
Since we cannot, and should not, attempt to summarize this source, we must remove this link and stick to what sources say.
2600:
939:
46:
3041:. I don't know where that birthday comes from. Some Wikipedians tried to be helpful by correcting her birth date (e.g.
80:
54:
1571:
just recount the facts as they appear in the case, and not make conclusions based on information that is unknowable. --
440:
and related articles on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1494:
518:
498:
327:
304:
2097:
Personally, I think you have a weak case trying to prove that two tags on questionable material is going to qualify.
916:
When I heard the news of what happen to this 15 year on the way to school I was completely outrage and very angry
2707:
2607:
with an excerpt that describes the incident again as "punching Du in the face four times and knocking her down."
2520:
2492:
2463:
1270:
408:
387:
2813:
2593:
Hi Grayfell. Thanks for creating this talk page, and for posting all the threatening messages on my talk page.
2478:
2435:
2406:
2375:
2340:
2280:
2247:
2214:
2200:
2152:
2110:
2058:
1988:
1945:
1924:
1861:
1704:
1556:
1419:
1413:
1334:
1109:
1047:
States, to say nothing of possible legal variances in other countries. One could certainly make an reasonable
983:
1794:
3015:
2678:
1168:
886:
The page is for discussing improvements to the article, not for general discussion of the article's topic. -
795:
740:
651:
3054:
3053:) but their edits were reverted because they didn't provide a source for their changes within the article.
1515:
1467:
1310:
1009:
851:
3050:
3046:
3042:
3038:
2887:
2845:
2737:
2516:
2488:
2459:
1544:
1287:
1249:
619:
510:
492:
2990:
which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. â
2859:
claim to be neutral. This shooting was a complicated situation, and needs to be properly contextualized.
2430:"You are now simply reverting out of spite." Well, I was wrong about ONE thing. You CAN make me laugh!
1234:
2223:
Your concerns about having no direct link to the source have been addressed. Your intentional gaming of
791:
736:
630:
86:
1030:
Take a look and compare. These two articles are identical in scope with a few details unique to both.
3007:
2840:
play fashion for those readers who want to fully understand what happened in this tragedy. Regards,
2603:(a secondary source) that describes the incident as "punched her in the face." Here is a book review
1898:
1869:
1591:
1536:
1482:
1442:
1326:
1302:
1262:
1036:
1001:
975:
927:
787:
732:
721:
643:
68:
2967:
2913:
2834:
2777:
2691:
2620:
2543:
1997:
You apparently don't understand tagging at all. The fact that they've been there so long mitigates
1839:
1749:
1664:
1620:
1595:
1124:
1105:
626:
50:
3084:
931:
526:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
335:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
246:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
2971:
2944:
2917:
2864:
2821:
2781:
2695:
2656:
2624:
2577:
1599:
1576:
1348:
1191:
728:
elderly woman under 115 lbs. Its tragic what happened, and there is blame to go on both sides.
668:
603:
570:
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between
42:
17:
2610:
If you prefer secondary sources and exact, non-interpretive phrasing, I can change it to this.
2166:) what the editor who wrote that sentence claimed it supported, and removes the need for those
1678:" to better understand. Furthermore you have removed the following cited facts without reason:
618:
This article says Soon Ja Du was convicted of involuntary manslaughter, but the article on the
3088:
2883:
2841:
2733:
2559:
2167:
2069:
2015:
1960:
1917:
From your title and your comment, it's obvious you know little about this case or the article.
1775:
935:
690:
224:
2928:
The first and second issues should be discussed above, to avoid multiple redundant sections.
1956:
1352:
1195:
1181:
437:
133:
1913:
Details of the breif struggle before Harlins's death should be mentioned for completeness.
3067:
2793:
2417:
2387:
2352:
2323:
2263:
2230:
2183:
2172:
2137:
2085:
2074:
2024:
1973:
1894:
1865:
1782:
1738:
1636:
1490:
1435:
1366:
1157:
Of course, it doesn't warrant her death but my god lads, let's get this straightened out.
1023:
866:
824:
587:
583:
2750:
I completely agree with your two-punch edit, and thank you for being so clear and civil.
3092:
3071:
3019:
2994:
2975:
2948:
2921:
2891:
2868:
2849:
2825:
2785:
2741:
2699:
2660:
2628:
2581:
2524:
2510:
2506:
2496:
2482:
2467:
2439:
2421:
2410:
2391:
2379:
2356:
2344:
2327:
2315:
2284:
2267:
2251:
2234:
2218:
2204:
2187:
2176:
2156:
2141:
2114:
2089:
2078:
2062:
2028:
1992:
1977:
1949:
1928:
1902:
1890:
1873:
1843:
1835:
1798:
1753:
1745:
1708:
1668:
1660:
1640:
1624:
1616:
1607:
1580:
1559:
1548:
1519:
1498:
1471:
1449:
1423:
1400:
1396:
1370:
1356:
1338:
1314:
1291:
1253:
1237:
1199:
1172:
1128:
1120:
1113:
1089:
1082:
1069:
1056:
1039:
987:
962:
943:
896:
870:
855:
827:
769:
672:
655:
634:
607:
424:
57:
exist to draw attention and ensure that more editors mediate or comment on the dispute.
319:
298:
3100:
2991:
2940:
2936:
2860:
2817:
2809:
2798:
2668:
2652:
2588:
2573:
2308:
2224:
2163:
1737:
Finally, you claim that your edits improve NPOV. Part of neutrality is explained in
1572:
664:
599:
2566:
2552:
208:
187:
2072:? Excessive tagging is very much discouraged on Knowledge. Please stop doing so.
2932:
1460:
1086:
1066:
1053:
1032:
ie. names, ages, roles of Billy and Charles Du, Du's lawyer, video proof, Tupac.
959:
566:
2931:
Grammar adjustments will still need to be neutral, and will still need to have
2242:
it's obvious from your comments so far that you would only ignore them again.
640:
Soon Ja Du was convicted of voluntary manslaughter per official court records
117:
99:
3063:
2256:
The link addresses your supposed "concerns." And readding those two tags will
1687:"She testified that she thought she would die if she was hit by Harlins again"
1632:
1486:
1362:
1019:
862:
414:
242:
237:
214:
123:
2939:, I think you should propose specific, actionable changes on this talk page.
2304:
Two tags on an article is not an especially egregious example of tag bombing.
2502:
1392:
1190:
heading out the door (so the stealing theory is not accurate in this case).
2473:
According to the court, that is. It is not as uncontroversial as it seems.
1388:
This article contained several paragraphs copied (or nearly copied) from
3004:
Why does it say she is was 15 when she died? This is basic mathematics
2487:
Yes, according to the court. That's how it's done it most countries.
1967:
out of line with these tags, given that the information you're tagging
2565:
We cannot attempt to interpret primary sources, as this is a form of
1151:
What absolute bullshit, seriously lads. Let's discuss, then change.
762:
153:. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
523:
332:
2706:
connected. From the facts as determined from the court record (
1692:
and reinserted phrases which are not supported by the citation.
31:
62:
26:
3000:
She would be 16 if born Jan 1st 1975 and died March 16th 1991
1681:"Du later testified that Harlins had threatened to kill her."
1889:- As there has been no comment in the past week, and as per
920:
I'd box this if I knew what the hell you were talking about.
2902:
Bias, "altercation," link to video, and grammatical issues.
924:
No such thing as rational or punish or not, do any is ok.
691:
https://caselaw.findlaw.com/ca-court-of-appeal/1769555.html
49:. Be patient when approaching solutions to any issues. If
2596:
I see, that's an interesting argument. And point taken.
958:
What in the article do you feel is biased, and how so?
236:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
3057:
but forgot to change her birth year, hence the mistake.
2804:
2297:
766:
1676:
Redundancy exercises: removing fluff from your writing
561:
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
2551:
Knowledge doesn't use direct links in articles, per
2010:
your main issue--I will replace the two tags (which
522:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
436:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
331:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
2548:Hello. Please discuss your proposed changes here.
1099:Again, I'm late to the party, but in my opinion
2760:
2718:
2808:is not appropriate to distort this to include
1860:I propose this article be moved to the title
45:while commenting or presenting evidence, and
8:
2614:Would you be okay with the following edit?
2296:I'm here to offer a third opinion based on
1244:opinion she had a right to defend herself.
3005:
2986:There is a move discussion in progress on
2558:Knowledge articles should not be based on
2385:amusing. Thanks for the chuckle. Regards,
1217:
1139:
925:
705:
663:/ correct it there is a good source here
641:
487:
382:
293:
182:
94:
596:Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment
1510:can be removed since they aren't links.
950:Yeah, that really straightens thing out.
3147:Low-importance Women's History articles
3055:An IP corrected her birthday last month
1220:
1142:
708:
683:
594:Above undated message substituted from
489:
384:
295:
184:
96:
66:
2648:
2644:
2599:Here is a link to an LA times article
2955:Need citation for Jury recommendation
1909:No mention of Latasha Harlins Assualt
450:Knowledge:WikiProject Women's History
7:
3157:WikiProject Women's History articles
3039:due to some random edit back in 2011
2708:5 Cal.App.4th 822, 7 Cal.Rptr.2d 177
2022:the solution. Please stop doing so.
1684:"at a distance of about three feet "
516:This article is within the scope of
453:Template:WikiProject Women's History
430:This article is within the scope of
325:This article is within the scope of
230:This article is within the scope of
139:This article is within the scope of
3152:All WikiProject Women-related pages
1065:I'd like to try merging the two. --
85:It is of interest to the following
3162:C-Class WikiProject Women articles
3122:Low-importance California articles
575:
571:
25:
3142:C-Class Women's History articles
3026:
2321:met with other than reversions.
2037:Now on to the edits in question.
2014:, in my view, a blatant case of
1880:
578:. Further details are available
565:
509:
491:
417:
407:
386:
318:
297:
256:Knowledge:WikiProject California
217:
207:
186:
126:
116:
98:
67:
30:
18:Talk:Shooting of Latasha Harlins
3127:WikiProject California articles
470:This article has been rated as
365:This article has been rated as
276:This article has been rated as
259:Template:WikiProject California
163:Knowledge:WikiProject Biography
3112:WikiProject Biography articles
2988:Talk:Killing of Lizzie O'Neill
2440:15:53, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
2422:15:45, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
2411:15:14, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
2392:00:10, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
2380:15:41, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
2357:16:36, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
2345:14:08, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
2328:00:19, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
2316:00:08, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
2285:14:24, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
1893:, the article has been moved.
1229:Soap Box Section Even though
770:22:53, 13 September 2005 (UTC)
166:Template:WikiProject Biography
1:
3137:Low-importance Death articles
3020:06:37, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
2995:18:20, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
2976:11:52, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
2949:23:09, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
2922:22:28, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
2892:03:41, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
2869:02:05, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
2850:00:35, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
2826:20:11, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
2786:11:52, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
2742:04:55, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
2700:23:14, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
2661:23:06, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
2629:22:43, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
2582:22:12, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
2268:16:16, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
2252:16:08, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
2235:16:01, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
2219:15:59, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
2205:15:57, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
2188:15:51, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
2177:15:48, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
2157:15:35, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
2142:15:27, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
2115:15:35, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
2090:15:25, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
2079:15:23, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
2063:15:04, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
2029:16:43, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
1993:16:07, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
1978:15:48, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
1950:15:12, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
1874:16:53, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
1560:11:11, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
1520:16:59, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
1499:01:41, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
1472:20:28, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
1401:03:52, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
1238:19:21, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
1057:20:05, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
1040:09:03, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
944:00:36, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
856:21:27, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
530:and see a list of open tasks.
444:and see a list of open tasks.
339:and see a list of open tasks.
250:and see a list of open tasks.
3072:14:13, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
2468:18:11, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
1625:19:51, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
1608:18:03, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
1581:11:34, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
1424:20:21, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
1408:Reliable sources noticeboard
1339:14:12, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
1292:18:37, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
1254:18:35, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
1090:21:34, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
1070:21:17, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
828:01:26, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
656:15:07, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
608:01:47, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
151:contribute to the discussion
47:do not make personal attacks
3117:C-Class California articles
2982:Move discussion in progress
1357:18:32, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
1200:18:33, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
536:Knowledge:WikiProject Women
433:WikiProject Women's History
345:Knowledge:WikiProject Death
3183:
3167:WikiProject Women articles
3107:C-Class biography articles
3093:09:47, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
2525:00:44, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
2511:13:54, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
1695:"Paramedics soon arrived,"
1549:10:43, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
1315:04:41, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
1231:Knowledge is not a soapbox
1129:18:28, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
1114:17:05, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
542:WikiProject Women articles
539:Template:WikiProject Women
476:project's importance scale
371:project's importance scale
348:Template:WikiProject Death
282:project's importance scale
2497:17:37, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
2483:18:58, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
2300:request. I'll be brief:
1903:20:48, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
1844:15:12, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
1799:05:03, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
1754:13:55, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
1709:22:43, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
1669:20:34, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
1641:07:29, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
1371:07:27, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
963:22:05, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
897:12:55, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
871:07:20, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
802:) 02:24 15 September 2005
747:) 20:56 13 September 2005
673:08:07, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
504:
469:
402:
364:
313:
275:
202:
111:
93:
2068:you even bother to read
1955:You really need to read
1929:16:05, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
1862:Death of Latasha Harlins
1781:If you continue to read
1557:User:Alexiod Palaiologos
1173:13:31, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
1101:Death of Latasha Harlins
635:22:13, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
456:Women's History articles
1769:an African American and
1450:22:45, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
1404:beat to death in there
988:03:09, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
3132:C-Class Death articles
2766:
2725:
620:1992 Los Angeles riots
233:WikiProject California
75:This article is rated
1163:comment was added by
582:. Student editor(s):
142:WikiProject Biography
2170:. Don't readd them.
1184:19:58, 12 May 2007 (
2647:the altercation or
2001:their staying, not
262:California articles
3078:Backpack or stool?
2910:Please elaborate.
2537:Primary video link
767:leave me a message
586:. Peer reviewers:
580:on the course page
169:biography articles
81:content assessment
3022:
3010:comment added by
2810:undue information
2747:Hi AzureCitizen,
2567:original research
1611:
1594:comment added by
1539:comment added by
1502:
1485:comment added by
1380:
1379:
1329:comment added by
1305:comment added by
1265:comment added by
1209:
1208:
1176:
1004:comment added by
978:comment added by
946:
930:comment added by
903:
902:
804:
790:comment added by
749:
735:comment added by
717:You Are Wrong...
658:
646:comment added by
558:
557:
554:
553:
550:
549:
519:WikiProject Women
486:
485:
482:
481:
381:
380:
377:
376:
328:WikiProject Death
292:
291:
288:
287:
225:California portal
181:
180:
177:
176:
61:
60:
16:(Redirected from
3174:
3033:
3030:
3029:
2838:
2672:
2592:
2547:
2313:
2164:assumed it would
1888:
1884:
1883:
1610:
1588:
1551:
1501:
1479:
1446:
1439:
1412:Discussion here:
1341:
1317:
1274:
1222:Extended content
1218:
1158:
1144:Extended content
1140:
1013:
990:
895:
892:
889:
803:
784:
748:
729:
710:Extended content
706:
693:
688:
614:Factual Accuracy
610:
577:
573:
569:
544:
543:
540:
537:
534:
513:
506:
505:
495:
488:
458:
457:
454:
451:
448:
427:
422:
421:
420:
411:
404:
403:
398:
390:
383:
353:
352:
349:
346:
343:
322:
315:
314:
309:
301:
294:
264:
263:
260:
257:
254:
227:
222:
221:
220:
211:
204:
203:
198:
190:
183:
171:
170:
167:
164:
161:
147:join the project
136:
134:Biography portal
131:
130:
129:
120:
113:
112:
102:
95:
78:
72:
71:
63:
53:is not reached,
34:
33:
27:
21:
3182:
3181:
3177:
3176:
3175:
3173:
3172:
3171:
3097:
3096:
3080:
3031:
3027:
3002:
2984:
2957:
2904:
2832:
2666:
2586:
2541:
2539:
2517:JamesBurnsLives
2489:JamesBurnsLives
2460:JamesBurnsLives
2456:
2309:
1937:
1911:
1881:
1879:
1858:
1649:
1589:
1568:
1534:
1530:
1480:
1457:
1444:
1437:
1431:
1429:Edits of 5/1/09
1410:
1386:
1381:
1324:
1300:
1267:124.191.144.209
1260:
1223:
1215:
1210:
1159:âThe preceding
1145:
1137:
1037:The Lake Effect
1028:
1024:Latasha Harlins
999:
980:216.251.181.207
973:
909:
904:
893:
890:
887:
785:
730:
722:Ridethefire3211
711:
703:
698:
697:
696:
689:
685:
616:
593:
572:26 January 2021
563:
541:
538:
535:
532:
531:
455:
452:
449:
447:Women's History
446:
445:
438:Women's history
423:
418:
416:
396:
394:Women's History
350:
347:
344:
341:
340:
307:
261:
258:
255:
252:
251:
223:
218:
216:
196:
168:
165:
162:
159:
158:
132:
127:
125:
79:on Knowledge's
76:
55:other solutions
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
3180:
3178:
3170:
3169:
3164:
3159:
3154:
3149:
3144:
3139:
3134:
3129:
3124:
3119:
3114:
3109:
3099:
3098:
3079:
3076:
3075:
3074:
3059:
3058:
3001:
2998:
2983:
2980:
2956:
2953:
2952:
2951:
2929:
2903:
2900:
2899:
2898:
2897:
2896:
2895:
2894:
2874:
2873:
2872:
2871:
2853:
2852:
2829:
2828:
2802:
2745:
2744:
2730:
2717:
2716:
2664:
2663:
2640:
2538:
2535:
2534:
2533:
2532:
2531:
2530:
2529:
2528:
2527:
2475:104.218.136.34
2455:
2452:
2451:
2450:
2449:
2448:
2447:
2446:
2445:
2444:
2443:
2442:
2432:24.187.214.210
2425:
2424:
2413:
2403:24.187.214.210
2395:
2394:
2372:24.187.214.210
2368:
2364:
2360:
2359:
2337:24.187.214.210
2332:
2331:
2330:
2305:
2294:
2293:
2292:
2291:
2290:
2289:
2288:
2287:
2277:24.187.214.210
2271:
2270:
2244:24.187.214.210
2238:
2237:
2211:24.187.214.210
2207:
2197:24.187.214.210
2191:
2190:
2179:
2149:24.187.214.210
2128:
2126:
2125:
2124:
2123:
2122:
2121:
2120:
2119:
2118:
2117:
2107:24.187.214.210
2102:
2098:
2093:
2092:
2081:
2055:24.187.214.210
2050:
2046:
2042:
2038:
2035:
1985:24.187.214.210
1942:24.187.214.210
1936:
1933:
1932:
1931:
1921:24.187.214.210
1918:
1910:
1907:
1906:
1905:
1857:
1854:
1853:
1852:
1851:
1850:
1849:
1848:
1847:
1846:
1824:
1823:
1822:
1821:
1820:
1819:
1818:
1817:
1806:
1805:
1804:
1803:
1802:
1801:
1791:184.97.244.140
1786:
1779:
1772:
1759:
1758:
1757:
1756:
1742:
1732:
1731:
1730:
1729:
1722:
1721:
1720:
1719:
1712:
1711:
1701:174.30.222.137
1698:
1697:
1696:
1690:
1689:
1688:
1685:
1682:
1648:
1645:
1644:
1643:
1628:
1627:
1612:
1567:
1564:
1563:
1562:
1529:
1526:
1525:
1524:
1523:
1522:
1504:
1503:
1456:
1453:
1430:
1427:
1416:130.156.29.230
1409:
1406:
1385:
1382:
1378:
1377:
1376:
1375:
1374:
1373:
1343:
1342:
1331:168.132.10.250
1319:
1318:
1295:
1294:
1278:
1277:
1276:
1275:
1235:130.156.29.112
1225:
1224:
1221:
1216:
1214:
1213:Off-topic chat
1211:
1207:
1206:
1205:
1204:
1202:
1186:
1185:
1147:
1146:
1143:
1138:
1136:
1135:Off-topic chat
1133:
1132:
1131:
1106:Ashley Pomeroy
1097:
1096:
1095:
1094:
1093:
1092:
1075:
1074:
1073:
1072:
1060:
1059:
1027:
1016:
1015:
1014:
994:
993:
992:
991:
966:
965:
952:
951:
922:
921:
915:
908:
905:
901:
900:
884:
883:
881:
880:
879:
878:
877:
876:
875:
874:
873:
837:
836:
835:
834:
833:
832:
831:
830:
812:
810:
809:
808:
807:
806:
805:
775:
774:
773:
772:
763:lots of issues
757:
756:
755:
754:
713:
712:
709:
704:
702:
701:Off-topic chat
699:
695:
694:
682:
681:
677:
661:
639:
615:
612:
562:
559:
556:
555:
552:
551:
548:
547:
545:
528:the discussion
514:
502:
501:
496:
484:
483:
480:
479:
472:Low-importance
468:
462:
461:
459:
442:the discussion
429:
428:
425:History portal
412:
400:
399:
397:Lowâimportance
391:
379:
378:
375:
374:
367:Low-importance
363:
357:
356:
354:
351:Death articles
337:the discussion
323:
311:
310:
308:Lowâimportance
302:
290:
289:
286:
285:
278:Low-importance
274:
268:
267:
265:
248:the discussion
229:
228:
212:
200:
199:
197:Lowâimportance
191:
179:
178:
175:
174:
172:
138:
137:
121:
109:
108:
103:
91:
90:
84:
73:
59:
58:
35:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
3179:
3168:
3165:
3163:
3160:
3158:
3155:
3153:
3150:
3148:
3145:
3143:
3140:
3138:
3135:
3133:
3130:
3128:
3125:
3123:
3120:
3118:
3115:
3113:
3110:
3108:
3105:
3104:
3102:
3095:
3094:
3090:
3086:
3077:
3073:
3069:
3065:
3061:
3060:
3056:
3052:
3048:
3044:
3040:
3036:
3025:
3024:
3023:
3021:
3017:
3013:
3012:115.64.232.27
3009:
2999:
2997:
2996:
2993:
2989:
2981:
2979:
2977:
2973:
2969:
2964:
2960:
2954:
2950:
2946:
2942:
2938:
2934:
2930:
2927:
2926:
2925:
2923:
2919:
2915:
2911:
2908:
2901:
2893:
2889:
2885:
2880:
2879:
2878:
2877:
2876:
2875:
2870:
2866:
2862:
2857:
2856:
2855:
2854:
2851:
2847:
2843:
2836:
2831:
2830:
2827:
2823:
2819:
2815:
2811:
2806:
2803:
2800:
2795:
2791:
2790:
2789:
2787:
2783:
2779:
2774:
2770:
2765:
2764:
2759:
2755:
2751:
2748:
2743:
2739:
2735:
2731:
2727:
2726:
2724:
2723:
2714:
2709:
2704:
2703:
2702:
2701:
2697:
2693:
2689:
2686:
2682:
2680:
2674:
2673:Hi Grayfell.
2670:
2662:
2658:
2654:
2650:
2646:
2641:
2638:
2634:
2633:
2632:
2630:
2626:
2622:
2618:
2615:
2611:
2608:
2606:
2602:
2597:
2594:
2590:
2584:
2583:
2579:
2575:
2570:
2568:
2563:
2561:
2556:
2554:
2549:
2545:
2536:
2526:
2522:
2518:
2514:
2513:
2512:
2508:
2504:
2500:
2499:
2498:
2494:
2490:
2486:
2485:
2484:
2480:
2476:
2472:
2471:
2470:
2469:
2465:
2461:
2453:
2441:
2437:
2433:
2429:
2428:
2427:
2426:
2423:
2420:
2419:
2414:
2412:
2408:
2404:
2399:
2398:
2397:
2396:
2393:
2390:
2389:
2383:
2382:
2381:
2377:
2373:
2369:
2367:to cooperate.
2365:
2362:
2361:
2358:
2355:
2354:
2348:
2347:
2346:
2342:
2338:
2333:
2329:
2326:
2325:
2319:
2318:
2317:
2314:
2312:
2306:
2303:
2302:
2301:
2299:
2286:
2282:
2278:
2273:
2272:
2269:
2266:
2265:
2259:
2255:
2254:
2253:
2249:
2245:
2240:
2239:
2236:
2233:
2232:
2226:
2222:
2221:
2220:
2216:
2212:
2208:
2206:
2202:
2198:
2193:
2192:
2189:
2186:
2185:
2180:
2178:
2175:
2174:
2169:
2165:
2160:
2159:
2158:
2154:
2150:
2146:
2145:
2144:
2143:
2140:
2139:
2133:
2129:
2116:
2112:
2108:
2103:
2099:
2095:
2094:
2091:
2088:
2087:
2082:
2080:
2077:
2076:
2071:
2066:
2065:
2064:
2060:
2056:
2051:
2047:
2043:
2039:
2036:
2032:
2031:
2030:
2027:
2026:
2021:
2017:
2013:
2009:
2004:
2000:
1996:
1995:
1994:
1990:
1986:
1981:
1980:
1979:
1976:
1975:
1970:
1966:
1962:
1958:
1954:
1953:
1952:
1951:
1947:
1943:
1934:
1930:
1926:
1922:
1919:
1916:
1915:
1914:
1908:
1904:
1900:
1896:
1892:
1887:
1878:
1877:
1876:
1875:
1871:
1867:
1863:
1856:Proposed Move
1855:
1845:
1841:
1837:
1832:
1831:
1830:
1829:
1828:
1827:
1826:
1825:
1814:
1813:
1812:
1811:
1810:
1809:
1808:
1807:
1800:
1796:
1792:
1787:
1784:
1780:
1777:
1776:please fix it
1773:
1770:
1765:
1764:
1763:
1762:
1761:
1760:
1755:
1751:
1747:
1743:
1740:
1736:
1735:
1734:
1733:
1726:
1725:
1724:
1723:
1716:
1715:
1714:
1713:
1710:
1706:
1702:
1699:
1694:
1693:
1691:
1686:
1683:
1680:
1679:
1677:
1673:
1672:
1671:
1670:
1666:
1662:
1658:
1655:
1652:
1646:
1642:
1638:
1634:
1630:
1629:
1626:
1622:
1618:
1613:
1609:
1605:
1601:
1597:
1593:
1585:
1584:
1583:
1582:
1578:
1574:
1565:
1561:
1558:
1554:
1553:
1552:
1550:
1546:
1542:
1538:
1527:
1521:
1517:
1513:
1512:68.38.183.158
1508:
1507:
1506:
1505:
1500:
1496:
1492:
1488:
1484:
1476:
1475:
1474:
1473:
1469:
1465:
1464:68.38.183.158
1462:
1455:Removed Cites
1454:
1452:
1451:
1448:
1447:
1441:
1440:
1428:
1426:
1425:
1421:
1417:
1414:
1407:
1405:
1402:
1398:
1394:
1390:
1383:
1372:
1368:
1364:
1360:
1359:
1358:
1354:
1350:
1345:
1344:
1340:
1336:
1332:
1328:
1321:
1320:
1316:
1312:
1308:
1304:
1297:
1296:
1293:
1289:
1285:
1280:
1279:
1272:
1268:
1264:
1257:
1256:
1255:
1251:
1247:
1242:
1241:
1240:
1239:
1236:
1232:
1227:
1226:
1219:
1212:
1203:
1201:
1197:
1193:
1188:
1187:
1183:
1179:
1178:
1177:
1174:
1170:
1166:
1165:58.178.93.113
1162:
1155:
1152:
1149:
1148:
1141:
1134:
1130:
1126:
1122:
1118:
1117:
1116:
1115:
1111:
1107:
1102:
1091:
1088:
1084:
1081:
1080:
1079:
1078:
1077:
1076:
1071:
1068:
1064:
1063:
1062:
1061:
1058:
1055:
1050:
1045:
1044:
1043:
1041:
1038:
1033:
1025:
1021:
1017:
1011:
1007:
1003:
996:
995:
989:
985:
981:
977:
970:
969:
968:
967:
964:
961:
957:
956:
955:
949:
948:
947:
945:
941:
937:
933:
929:
919:
918:
917:
913:
906:
899:
898:
882:
872:
868:
864:
859:
858:
857:
853:
849:
848:130.156.30.59
845:
844:
843:
842:
841:
840:
839:
838:
829:
826:
821:
820:
819:
818:
817:
816:
815:
814:
813:
801:
797:
793:
792:66.171.238.76
789:
781:
780:
779:
778:
777:
776:
771:
768:
764:
761:
760:
759:
758:
751:
750:
746:
742:
738:
737:66.171.238.76
734:
726:
725:
724:
723:
718:
715:
714:
707:
700:
692:
687:
684:
680:
676:
674:
670:
666:
659:
657:
653:
649:
648:152.132.10.72
645:
637:
636:
632:
628:
623:
621:
613:
611:
609:
605:
601:
597:
591:
589:
585:
581:
568:
560:
546:
529:
525:
521:
520:
515:
512:
508:
507:
503:
500:
497:
494:
490:
477:
473:
467:
464:
463:
460:
443:
439:
435:
434:
426:
415:
413:
410:
406:
405:
401:
395:
392:
389:
385:
372:
368:
362:
359:
358:
355:
338:
334:
330:
329:
324:
321:
317:
316:
312:
306:
303:
300:
296:
283:
279:
273:
270:
269:
266:
249:
245:
244:
239:
235:
234:
226:
215:
213:
210:
206:
205:
201:
195:
192:
189:
185:
173:
156:
155:documentation
152:
148:
144:
143:
135:
124:
122:
119:
115:
114:
110:
107:
104:
101:
97:
92:
88:
82:
74:
70:
65:
64:
56:
52:
48:
44:
40:
36:
29:
28:
19:
3081:
3034:
3006:â Preceding
3003:
2985:
2965:
2961:
2958:
2912:
2909:
2905:
2884:AzureCitizen
2842:AzureCitizen
2775:
2771:
2767:
2762:
2761:
2756:
2752:
2749:
2746:
2734:AzureCitizen
2720:
2719:
2711:
2690:
2687:
2683:
2675:
2665:
2636:
2619:
2616:
2612:
2609:
2598:
2595:
2585:
2571:
2564:
2557:
2550:
2540:
2457:
2416:
2386:
2351:
2322:
2310:
2295:
2262:
2257:
2229:
2182:
2171:
2136:
2131:
2130:
2127:
2084:
2073:
2023:
2019:
2011:
2007:
2002:
1998:
1972:
1968:
1964:
1938:
1935:Weasel Words
1912:
1885:
1859:
1768:
1659:
1656:
1653:
1650:
1590:â Preceding
1569:
1541:24.22.49.209
1531:
1458:
1443:
1436:
1432:
1411:
1387:
1307:67.83.180.95
1284:76.115.59.36
1261:â Preceding
1246:76.115.59.36
1228:
1156:
1153:
1150:
1100:
1098:
1048:
1031:
1029:
1006:207.81.98.77
953:
926:â Preceding
923:
914:
910:
885:
811:
783:superficial.
719:
716:
686:
678:
660:
642:â Preceding
638:
624:
617:
592:
564:
517:
471:
431:
366:
326:
277:
241:
231:
140:
87:WikiProjects
37:Please stay
2776:Sincerely,
2016:tag-bombing
1535:âPreceding
1481:âPreceding
1384:plagiarism!
1325:âPreceding
1301:âPreceding
1018:Merging of
1000:âPreceding
974:âPreceding
786:âPreceding
731:âPreceding
576:10 May 2021
3101:Categories
2814:in context
2605:BOOKREVIEW
2560:WP:PRIMARY
2070:WP:TAGBOMB
1963:. You are
1961:WP:TAGBOMB
1895:Boneyard90
1866:Boneyard90
1528:Soon Ja Du
1020:Soon Ja Du
825:FantajiFan
679:References
588:Trentbohan
584:Mbrennan21
253:California
243:California
238:U.S. state
194:California
2978:Editgram
2933:consensus
2924:Editgram
2799:talk page
2788:Editgram
2631:Editgram
2562:sources.
2101:obtained.
1957:WP:WEASEL
1836:ThatSaved
1746:ThatSaved
1661:ThatSaved
1647:July 2011
1617:ThatSaved
1121:ThatSaved
675:kav2001c
160:Biography
106:Biography
51:consensus
3008:unsigned
2992:RMCD bot
2968:Editgram
2966:Thanks,
2959:Hi All,
2941:Grayfell
2914:Editgram
2861:Grayfell
2835:Editgram
2818:Grayfell
2778:Editgram
2692:Editgram
2679:UCHICAGO
2669:Grayfell
2653:Grayfell
2621:Editgram
2589:Grayfell
2574:Grayfell
2544:Editgram
2311:Keihatsu
2168:two tags
1783:WP:UNDUE
1739:WP:UNDUE
1604:contribs
1596:JinaBean
1592:unsigned
1573:Mherlihy
1537:unsigned
1495:contribs
1483:unsigned
1327:unsigned
1303:unsigned
1263:unsigned
1161:unsigned
1083:Be bold!
1049:argument
1026:articles
1002:unsigned
976:unsigned
940:contribs
928:unsigned
800:contribs
788:unsigned
745:contribs
733:unsigned
665:Kav2001c
644:unsigned
627:Linclinc
600:PrimeBOT
3085:Jzburda
2601:LATIMES
2049:errand.
1999:against
1891:WP:BOLD
1718:detail.
1478:Du's.
932:Lyhendk
474:on the
369:on the
280:on the
77:C-class
2937:WP:3RR
2645:during
2225:WP:3RR
1349:Chic3z
1192:Chic3z
1182:Claude
1087:Mwelch
1067:Seazzy
1054:Mwelch
960:Mwelch
907:biased
83:scale.
3064:Kzkzb
3049:, or
3035:Fixed
2794:civil
2710:): "
2649:after
2637:first
2553:WP:EL
2454:Edits
2258:still
2132:NOTE:
1728:her..
1633:Ranze
1487:Saaws
1445:rolls
1363:Ranze
1085:8-)
863:Ranze
533:Women
524:women
499:Women
342:Death
333:Death
305:Death
43:civil
3089:talk
3068:talk
3051:this
3047:this
3043:this
3016:talk
2972:talk
2945:talk
2918:talk
2888:talk
2865:talk
2846:talk
2822:talk
2805:Your
2782:talk
2738:talk
2713:her.
2696:talk
2657:talk
2625:talk
2578:talk
2521:talk
2507:talk
2503:Widr
2493:talk
2479:talk
2464:talk
2436:talk
2407:talk
2376:talk
2341:talk
2298:this
2281:talk
2248:talk
2215:talk
2201:talk
2153:talk
2111:talk
2059:talk
2034:you.
1989:talk
1965:very
1946:talk
1925:talk
1899:talk
1886:Done
1870:talk
1840:talk
1795:talk
1750:talk
1705:talk
1665:talk
1637:talk
1621:talk
1600:talk
1577:talk
1566:NPOV
1545:talk
1516:talk
1491:talk
1468:talk
1461:WP:V
1438:Tide
1420:talk
1397:talk
1393:kine
1367:talk
1353:talk
1335:talk
1311:talk
1288:talk
1271:talk
1250:talk
1196:talk
1169:talk
1125:talk
1110:talk
1022:and
1010:talk
984:talk
936:talk
867:talk
852:talk
796:talk
741:talk
669:talk
652:talk
631:talk
604:talk
574:and
149:and
41:and
39:calm
2418:LHM
2388:LHM
2353:LHM
2324:LHM
2264:LHM
2231:LHM
2184:LHM
2173:LHM
2138:LHM
2086:LHM
2075:LHM
2025:LHM
2020:not
2012:are
2003:for
1974:LHM
894:PhD
891:mer
888:Sum
598:by
466:Low
361:Low
272:Low
240:of
3103::
3091:)
3070:)
3045:,
3018:)
2974:)
2947:)
2920:)
2890:)
2867:)
2848:)
2824:)
2784:)
2740:)
2698:)
2659:)
2627:)
2580:)
2555:.
2523:)
2509:)
2495:)
2481:)
2466:)
2438:)
2409:)
2378:)
2343:)
2283:)
2250:)
2217:)
2203:)
2155:)
2113:)
2061:)
2008:is
1991:)
1969:is
1948:)
1927:)
1901:)
1872:)
1842:)
1797:)
1752:)
1707:)
1667:)
1639:)
1623:)
1606:)
1602:â¢
1579:)
1547:)
1518:)
1497:)
1493:â¢
1470:)
1422:)
1399:)
1369:)
1355:)
1337:)
1313:)
1290:)
1273:)
1252:)
1198:)
1171:)
1127:)
1112:)
1042:)
1012:)
986:)
942:)
938:â¢
869:)
854:)
798:â¢
765:|
743:â¢
671:)
654:)
633:)
606:)
590:.
3087:(
3066:(
3032:Y
3014:(
2970:(
2943:(
2916:(
2886:(
2863:(
2844:(
2837::
2833:@
2820:(
2780:(
2736:(
2694:(
2671::
2667:@
2655:(
2623:(
2591::
2587:@
2576:(
2546::
2542:@
2519:(
2505:(
2491:(
2477:(
2462:(
2434:(
2405:(
2374:(
2339:(
2279:(
2246:(
2213:(
2199:(
2151:(
2109:(
2057:(
1987:(
1944:(
1923:(
1897:(
1868:(
1838:(
1793:(
1778:.
1748:(
1741:.
1703:(
1663:(
1635:(
1619:(
1598:(
1575:(
1543:(
1514:(
1489:(
1466:(
1418:(
1395:(
1365:(
1351:(
1333:(
1309:(
1286:(
1269:(
1248:(
1194:(
1175:.
1167:(
1123:(
1108:(
1104:-
1008:(
982:(
934:(
865:(
850:(
794:(
739:(
667:(
650:(
629:(
602:(
478:.
373:.
284:.
157:.
89::
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
