837:
only
American spelling/or advocate its supremacy will alway see this as incorrect or at least... less than correct. We can't even depend on "reliable sources" on this, because they also spell words based on such perspective. So I am sure NYT or American engineer will always spell it with single l, while the reverse is the case if you read related content on UK's Guardian. Moreover, I think after these series of back and forth moves, it is right time to move-protect the page, because this will not stop in as much as British/American spelling variation exists. –
82:
64:
167:
92:
33:
343:
date, that meant users could get calling line ID right to their extension on the PBX, DID trunks could use out-of-band signalling, etc. Granted most businesses in the world are small and use fewer than 10 telephone trunks (so don't need a PRI), but virtually every large business was changing out to PRI's. That's my experience; YMMV.
327:
PBX singllaing then its DPNSS, DASS2, etc?) Its not in use on mobile handsets , though once it gets beyond the air interface it does become used by the upper layers of signalling employed by the handset? Its late and I'm giving up for the night but I'm sure someone else can be along to help you in more detail.
836:
since it was the first spelling used by the creator way back in 2006, and also since being so doesn't mean it is incorrect,. It is just issue of
English variant and perspective of editors/readers. Those who double their l's in everyday writing will see it as correct on first sight and those who know
608:
I don't necessarily know if it's correct to say that SS7 uses "out-of-band" signaling, since that would be more like using the first 3500Hz for audio and then signaling in 3700Hz. I think it's more correct to say that SS7 uses common channel signaling, since bearer and control channels are distinctly
1131:
There is certainly a lot of history in spelling it with double-l, since that was the name primarily used around the world after the CCITT standardized it, a name that was used much less in the US, where the original publications called it Common
Channel Interoffice Signaling. This is in contrast to
342:
I've been out of telecom for about 15 years, but even in the 1990's in
Toronto, many businesses were switching from analog to digital trunks, particularly the T-1 variety (aka "Primary Rate Interface" or PRI) where they got 23 bearer channels and 1 signalling channel. If the customer CPE was up to
326:
Apologies if I misunderstand your question, but its generally not in use around the edge of the network. where analogue signalling or other digital signalling systems are in use such as V5, GR303(? US V5 equivalent), similar proprietary systems or perhaps ISDN, etc are used more (or in the case of
537:
from the article, this appears to be more common in Europe than North
America? So there seems like there should be an affinity towards British English, which would use the double-l, and as the official ANSI standard also uses the double-l, the double-l form would seem to be the better choice.
362:
The term F-Link, (and A-Link, B-Link etc), are not utilised in the ITU specifications and are not commonly known in Europe. The terminology in Europe relates to whether the link is directly connected to the SP or not. All signalling links directly connected to an SP are known as an
Associated
216:
I was a bit confused at first when I saw
Signalling System #7 but I think that the # should be in the title, I can't find a referenced source at the moment as i'm about to go out. Let's agree here first what the title should be and then make the final change once and for all.
555:. The title is capitalised, hence it should be treated as a proper noun. Since the official documentation of the standard uses the double-l, we should follow unless there's overwhelming evidence people are using this "Signaling System No 7" with the single-l as a proper noun.
267:
Sounds good enough to me. No # then seems like the way forward. Should also remove the pound tag as well at the beginning. To resolve the name completely, can you confirm whether the word 'number' included in the titles? Is is
Signaling System Number 7 or Signaling System
251:
Going to the ITU website and downloading some of the relevant specs (Q701,2 etc) theres no hash in the title - they use "No." as in
Signalling System No. 7. Its possible the hash just slipped in as shorthand by engineers rather than being part of the original name.
1066:
I mean, has not VoLTE and SMSoIP and ViLTE and RCS with E2EE going through
Internet, like with normal interconnection (inter-) of autonomous systems (AS, -net) using BGP deprecated SS7? USSD over SGs and all other stuff is also available.
812:
03:05, June 25, 2011 Lincoln Josh (talk | contribs | block) m . . (18,506 bytes) (0) . . (moved Signaling System No 7 to Signalling System No 7: I'm now doing total spelling check in the area. The British standard is widespread in
920:
In the physical network section, there are references to ‘timeslots’. The first of which links to an article on broadcast programming. Could someone clarify what that means in this context and potentially change that link? -
1132:
the earlier systems, Signaling System 5 and 6. Most Bell System pubs spell 'signaling' (one el), but double-el can also be found. I think, I adjusted all these at one point to the most common historical spellings.
799:
18:34, October 13, 2011 Arbitrarily0 (talk | contribs | block) m . . (18,860 bytes) (0) . . (moved Signaling System No 7 to Signalling System No. 7: requested move; consensus at Talk:Signalling System No.
1236:
I don't think that is a good idea. SS7 is definitively an American/Bell System topic by origin, just like the other signaling systems. Proper names are always allowed to have any spelling, I would think.
818:
02:43, May 16, 2010 ChrisUK (talk | contribs | block) m . . (19,029 bytes) (0) . . (moved Signaling System 7 to Signaling System No 7: This is correct title as per ITU standards - see talk)
807:
04:32, June 26, 2011 Johnuniq (talk | contribs | block) m . . (18,410 bytes) (0) . . (moved Signalling System No 7 to Signaling System No 7 over redirect: rv undiscussed move per WP:ENGVAR)
1276:
138:
311:
Where is the protocol not in use in the PTSN? Is it used internally for pulse-dialed and touchtone landlines after the local central office? Is it used by cell phone handsets? --
144:
1010:
alerting readers of this discussion. Given the technical nature of this article, I have a hunch that such a notice 1) will be appreciated and 2) result in a better "end result."
624:
I agree with this point of view and it meshes with the older name, CCS7. Perhaps the "out of band" comes from a T1 system with 1 channel for signaling and 23 for transport.
1167:
Oops, I apparently willfully ignored the discussions above. If we're going with British English in the title, we probably should make the body text match that. I agree with
1041:
1007:
114:
286:
All the ITU specs are free and online at www.itu.ch as PDF files, but in the main its neither, rather its "Signalling System No. 7" See this link as an example:
1271:
105:
69:
825:
09:58, October 5, 2006 Gabi S. (talk | contribs | block) m . . (9,690 bytes) (0) . . (moved Signalling System 7 to Signaling System 7: Spelling)
184:
471:
1087:
631:
344:
683:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
610:
370:
539:
734:
44:
692:
The result of the move request was: Contested move and consensus is not to move. Because of this the article was not moved.
1022:
983:
The article could certainly benefit from better structure, better technical and historical overview, and better detail.
896:
674:
597:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
426:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
1072:
517:
232:
It is certainly not "Signaling System Number #7". Please desist from putting both the word "Number" and the "#"
196:
1091:
97:
906:
684:
635:
348:
50:
614:
763:
738:
708:
463:
374:
1222:, elsewhere. I would think we'd want to declare this a European topic and use British English throughout. ~
627:
501:
366:
81:
63:
1114:
1110:
1106:
543:
1146:
PS: A prior consensus discussion, see above, retains the original spelling. I think I agree with that.
1068:
648:
is a broad term. It not only applies strictly to frequency, but also distinct channels of transmission.
559:
459:
332:
294:
257:
113:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1189:
I thought I already did that earlier. But some book titles decided otherwise, which I didn't change.
717:– The article is spelled wrong (one L in signaling). The move should occur to correct the spelling.
32:
1102:
944:
Would it make sense to re-work a few of the technical aspects of this article along these lines?
833:
774:
509:
930:
878:
860:
842:
786:
722:
479:
394:
237:
202:
1049:
1018:
949:
525:
436:
273:
222:
110:
1242:
1194:
1151:
1137:
988:
693:
653:
556:
505:
483:
398:
328:
316:
290:
253:
241:
198:
166:
575:
588:
417:
1227:
1180:
1122:
17:
1105:
question. It looks like the current article text consistently uses American spelling.
1265:
1168:
923:
874:
856:
838:
782:
718:
1246:
1231:
1198:
1184:
1155:
1141:
1126:
1095:
1076:
1053:
1045:
1035:
1028:
1011:
1001:
992:
953:
945:
934:
882:
864:
846:
790:
768:
743:
726:
702:
657:
639:
618:
579:
562:
547:
529:
521:
487:
453:
402:
378:
363:
Signalling links, irrespective of whether they are connecting to an SEP, STP etc.
352:
336:
320:
298:
277:
269:
261:
245:
226:
218:
200:
759:
1238:
1205:
1190:
1162:
1147:
1133:
984:
649:
312:
905:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a
571:
87:
1086:
The title says Signalling with double L, but the article uses a single L. --
1223:
1176:
1118:
385:
ITU-T Recommendation Q.700 Clause 2.3 identifies links attached to STP as
762:. I could be convinced to move it, though. See also previous RM above. --
467:
976:
Talk through of how the protocol works for a few of the major functions
287:
873:
That is good. Now people should focus more on improving the article. –
1062:
Deprecation of SS7 in favour of VoLTE IMS and BGPv4 AS interconnect?
973:
Architecture diagram + description of major components + their role
496:: It is not "simply wrong" under Knowledge (XXG)'s guidelines if a
1006:
If you haven't already done so, post a neutrally-worded notice on
773:
This has been moved multiple times in the past. There is also an
959:
major functionality : description of each of these including:
203:
160:
26:
416:
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a
713:
289:
I did look at a handful of others but not exhaustively
895:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
587:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
466:– The name of the standard in ITU-T specifications
109:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
1113:titles use American spelling. Seems like a move to
1008:
Knowledge (XXG) talk:WikiProject Telecommunications
687:. No further edits should be made to this section.
909:. No further edits should be made to this section.
470:is the proposed title. Also, my hard copy of the
143:This article has not yet received a rating on the
832:Retain the current spelling with double 'L', per
478:. The current article title is simply wrong. —
1277:Unknown-importance Telecommunications articles
760:http://www.itu.int/rec/T-REC-Q.700-199303-I/en
123:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Telecommunications
8:
1117:is appropriate and likely uncontroversial. ~
673:The following is a closed discussion of a
58:
474:ANSI T1.111-1992 has the proposed title,
431:The result of the move request was: page
758:reliable sources using the LL spelling.
733:This is a contested technical request (
389:and only links attached between SEP as
126:Template:WikiProject Telecommunications
60:
30:
472:American National Standards Institute
7:
103:This article is within the scope of
1272:C-Class Telecommunications articles
49:It is of interest to the following
25:
1210:it appears you're content to use
777:issue here that has been ignored
165:
90:
80:
62:
31:
1218:but use the American spelling,
106:WikiProject Telecommunications
1:
1247:01:56, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
1232:22:38, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
1216:Signalling System No. 7 (SS7)
1199:01:24, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
1185:01:15, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
1156:18:26, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
1142:18:21, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
1127:15:33, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
1096:05:25, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
935:19:09, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
855:Move protected as requested.
666:Requested move 22 August 2018
658:15:30, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
619:19:53, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
508:spelling of "signaling" (see
117:and see a list of open tasks.
1082:"Signalling" or "Signaling"?
1054:00:36, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
1040:Thanks for the suggestion.
1029:20:10, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
993:20:06, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
954:12:13, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
454:23:34, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
403:06:44, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
379:11:06, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
353:14:58, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
883:03:50, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
865:23:04, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
847:21:21, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
791:20:45, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
769:16:24, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
744:16:24, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
727:16:02, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
703:14:14, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
580:20:48, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
563:08:38, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
548:05:02, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
530:04:45, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
488:02:35, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
129:Telecommunications articles
1293:
468:ITU-T Recommendation Q.700
145:project's importance scale
1077:17:48, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
640:02:09, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
337:23:12, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
321:18:36, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
142:
75:
57:
902:Please do not modify it.
781:times. Conclusion: ugh.
680:Please do not modify it.
594:Please do not modify it.
423:Please do not modify it.
299:13:23, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
278:21:43, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
262:11:17, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
246:07:31, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
227:05:40, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
98:Telecommunication portal
962:discovery and directory
709:Signalling System No. 7
570:as per comments above.
516:name and spelling (see
512:) is preferred over an
500:name and spelling (see
476:Signalling System No. 7
464:Signalling System No. 7
18:Talk:Signaling System 7
1115:Signaling System No. 7
1111:Signaling System No. 6
1107:Signaling System No. 5
968:Routing and addressing
829:
714:Signaling System No. 7
39:This article is rated
795:
604:SS7 and "out-of-band"
460:Signaling System No 7
43:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
765:SarekOfVulcan (talk)
740:SarekOfVulcan (talk)
1214:in the proper noun
965:Call establishment
754:because there are
609:separated in SS7.
120:Telecommunications
111:Telecommunications
70:Telecommunications
45:content assessment
1027:
1026:
940:Improved article?
863:
827:
821:
802:
789:
746:
630:comment added by
369:comment added by
209:
208:
189:
159:
158:
155:
154:
151:
150:
16:(Redirected from
1284:
1209:
1166:
1069:Valery Zapolodov
1039:
1016:
1015:
1005:
926:
904:
859:
823:
804:
797:
785:
766:
741:
732:
716:
682:
642:
596:
518:WP:OFFICIALNAMES
506:American English
451:
425:
387:quasi-associated
381:
307:Deployment scope
204:
187:
169:
161:
131:
130:
127:
124:
121:
100:
95:
94:
93:
84:
77:
76:
66:
59:
42:
36:
35:
27:
21:
1292:
1291:
1287:
1286:
1285:
1283:
1282:
1281:
1262:
1261:
1203:
1171:'s conclusion:
1160:
1084:
1064:
1033:
999:
942:
924:
918:
913:
900:
764:
739:
712:
678:
668:
625:
606:
601:
592:
447:
443:
437:
421:
411:
364:
360:
309:
236:in the lede. —
214:
205:
199:
190:
174:
128:
125:
122:
119:
118:
96:
91:
89:
40:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
1290:
1288:
1280:
1279:
1274:
1264:
1263:
1260:
1259:
1258:
1257:
1256:
1255:
1254:
1253:
1252:
1251:
1250:
1249:
1144:
1088:185.176.78.206
1083:
1080:
1063:
1060:
1059:
1058:
1057:
1056:
997:
996:
995:
978:
977:
974:
971:
970:
969:
966:
963:
941:
938:
917:
914:
912:
911:
897:requested move
891:
890:
889:
888:
887:
886:
885:
868:
867:
850:
849:
794:
793:
771:
748:
747:
706:
690:
689:
675:requested move
669:
667:
664:
663:
662:
661:
660:
632:71.176.201.187
605:
602:
600:
599:
589:requested move
583:
582:
565:
550:
532:
457:
445:
441:
429:
428:
418:requested move
412:
410:
409:Requested move
407:
406:
405:
359:
356:
345:99.235.138.200
340:
339:
308:
305:
304:
303:
302:
301:
281:
280:
249:
248:
213:
210:
207:
206:
201:
197:
195:
192:
191:
183:
180:
179:
176:
175:
170:
164:
157:
156:
153:
152:
149:
148:
141:
135:
134:
132:
115:the discussion
102:
101:
85:
73:
72:
67:
55:
54:
48:
37:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1289:
1278:
1275:
1273:
1270:
1269:
1267:
1248:
1244:
1240:
1235:
1234:
1233:
1229:
1225:
1221:
1217:
1213:
1207:
1202:
1201:
1200:
1196:
1192:
1188:
1187:
1186:
1182:
1178:
1174:
1170:
1164:
1159:
1158:
1157:
1153:
1149:
1145:
1143:
1139:
1135:
1130:
1129:
1128:
1124:
1120:
1116:
1112:
1108:
1104:
1100:
1099:
1098:
1097:
1093:
1089:
1081:
1079:
1078:
1074:
1070:
1061:
1055:
1051:
1047:
1043:
1037:
1032:
1031:
1030:
1024:
1020:
1013:
1009:
1003:
998:
994:
990:
986:
982:
981:
980:
979:
975:
972:
967:
964:
961:
960:
958:
957:
956:
955:
951:
947:
939:
937:
936:
933:
932:
928:
915:
910:
908:
903:
898:
893:
892:
884:
880:
876:
872:
871:
870:
869:
866:
862:
858:
854:
853:
852:
851:
848:
844:
840:
835:
831:
830:
828:
826:
820:
819:
815:
814:
809:
808:
803:
801:
792:
788:
784:
780:
776:
772:
770:
767:
761:
757:
753:
750:
749:
745:
742:
736:
731:
730:
729:
728:
724:
720:
715:
710:
705:
704:
700:
699:
698:
688:
686:
681:
676:
671:
670:
665:
659:
655:
651:
647:
644:
643:
641:
637:
633:
629:
623:
622:
621:
620:
616:
612:
611:63.211.239.34
603:
598:
595:
590:
585:
584:
581:
577:
573:
569:
566:
564:
561:
558:
554:
551:
549:
545:
541:
536:
533:
531:
527:
523:
519:
515:
511:
507:
503:
502:WP:COMMONNAME
499:
498:commonly-used
495:
492:
491:
490:
489:
485:
481:
477:
473:
469:
465:
461:
456:
455:
452:
450:
449:
448:
434:
427:
424:
419:
414:
413:
408:
404:
400:
396:
392:
388:
384:
383:
382:
380:
376:
372:
371:192.91.191.29
368:
357:
355:
354:
350:
346:
338:
334:
330:
325:
324:
323:
322:
318:
314:
306:
300:
296:
292:
288:
285:
284:
283:
282:
279:
275:
271:
266:
265:
264:
263:
259:
255:
247:
243:
239:
235:
231:
230:
229:
228:
224:
220:
211:
194:
193:
186:
182:
181:
178:
177:
173:
168:
163:
162:
146:
140:
137:
136:
133:
116:
112:
108:
107:
99:
88:
86:
83:
79:
78:
74:
71:
68:
65:
61:
56:
52:
46:
38:
34:
29:
28:
19:
1219:
1215:
1211:
1172:
1085:
1065:
943:
931:#TeamTrees🌳
922:
919:
901:
894:
824:
822:
817:
816:
811:
810:
806:
805:
798:
796:
778:
755:
751:
707:
696:
695:
691:
679:
672:
645:
626:— Preceding
607:
593:
586:
567:
552:
540:70.24.247.61
534:
513:
497:
493:
475:
458:
440:
439:
438:
432:
430:
422:
415:
390:
386:
361:
341:
310:
250:
233:
215:
171:
104:
51:WikiProjects
907:move review
685:move review
646:Out of band
504:) like the
365:—Preceding
329:beardybloke
291:beardybloke
254:beardybloke
188:(2003–2008)
1266:Categories
1212:signalling
1101:That's an
444:rbitrarily
391:associated
1220:signaling
1103:WP:ENGVAR
916:Timeslots
834:WP:RETAIN
775:WP:RETAIN
752:Contested
735:permalink
510:WP:ENGVAR
185:Archive 1
1169:Dekimasu
1023:contribs
875:Ammarpad
857:Dekimasu
839:Ammarpad
813:Europe.)
783:Dekimasu
719:Mblumber
628:unsigned
514:official
367:unsigned
234:together
212:Number 7
172:Archives
1046:Chumpih
1036:Davidwr
1012:davidwr
1002:Chumpih
946:Chumpih
779:several
694:Dreamy
568:Support
535:Comment
522:Zzyzx11
494:Comment
358:F Links
270:ChrisUK
219:ChrisUK
41:C-class
1239:kbrose
1206:Kbrose
1191:kbrose
1163:Kbrose
1148:kbrose
1134:kbrose
985:kbrose
650:Kbrose
560:yck C.
480:Dgtsyb
395:Dgtsyb
313:Beland
238:Dgtsyb
47:scale.
572:Nageh
433:moved
1243:talk
1228:talk
1224:Kvng
1195:talk
1181:talk
1177:Kvng
1173:ugh.
1152:talk
1138:talk
1123:talk
1119:Kvng
1109:and
1092:talk
1073:talk
1050:talk
1042:Done
1019:talk
989:talk
950:talk
925:Chip
879:talk
843:talk
756:very
723:talk
701:🎷
697:Jazz
654:talk
636:talk
615:talk
576:talk
553:Move
544:talk
526:talk
484:talk
399:talk
393:. —
375:talk
349:talk
333:talk
317:talk
295:talk
274:talk
258:talk
242:talk
223:talk
1021:)/(
899:.
737:).
591:.
557:Der
520:).
139:???
1268::
1245:)
1230:)
1197:)
1183:)
1154:)
1140:)
1125:)
1094:)
1075:)
1052:)
1044:.
991:)
952:)
929:•
927:🐺
881:)
861:よ!
845:)
800:7)
787:よ!
725:)
711:→
677:.
656:)
638:)
617:)
578:)
546:)
528:)
486:)
462:→
435:.
420:.
401:)
377:)
351:)
335:)
319:)
297:)
276:)
268:7?
260:)
244:)
225:)
1241:(
1226:(
1208::
1204:@
1193:(
1179:(
1175:~
1165::
1161:@
1150:(
1136:(
1121:(
1090:(
1071:(
1048:(
1038::
1034:@
1025:)
1017:(
1014:/
1004::
1000:@
987:(
948:(
877:(
841:(
721:(
652:(
634:(
613:(
574:(
542:(
524:(
482:(
446:0
442:A
397:(
373:(
347:(
331:(
315:(
293:(
272:(
256:(
240:(
221:(
147:.
53::
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
