273:"The song was sung simultaneously in English and German by troops during the Christmas truce of 1914, as it was one of the few carols that soldiers on both sides of the front line knew." - This may be more urban myth than fact. Rifleman Graham Williams quoted in Brown and Seaton's book, Christmas Truce, says of the Germans singing Stille Nacht: 'This was actually the first time I heard this carol, which was not then so popular in this country as it has since become'. He says O Come All Ye Faithful was the hymn which both sides started singing together and our own research of soldiers' letters reprinted in UK papers (www.christmastruce.co.uk) suggests Home Sweet Home was the song that mellowed the troops most - as it apparently did 50 years earlier during the American Civil War! - Alan Cleaver
575:, then it's certainly true for your own website. (And if it's an open wiki, then it's generally not allowed as an external link at all, except in quite limited circumstances). If the material isn't original research, and is verifiable, then the thing to do is not to link to it, but to make it a part of the encyclopedia directly. In this case, the editor interested in the files is going to work on uploading them to Wikimedia commons, and then add the links in to the articles, which is unquestionably the ideal thing all round.
1864:. It is interesting that the info at this link states that the organ was playable which contradicts what the IP is trying to add. It also mentions that the first time that hungry mouse damage is mentioned comes from Hertha Pauli in 1954. That could be worth a mention and would help to offset any editors who want to state it as fact. The info about Mohr's skull is also interesting but probably not relevant to this article. I look forward to reading what other editors think.
31:
1965:
1521:
the article's "External links" section) different from the one here? If you're referring to the awkward melisma on "traute heilige Paar" – that's not how it's sung in
Germany today, but "traute hochheilige Paar" for its better flow. d) I can't comment on whether a 4-verse version is used much in English. If it is, it ought to added. --
2121:) 00:29, 18 December 2021 (UTC)The two lines of music headed "First edition" are in fact identical to the second (with a few minor differences of musical orthography). Could someone undertake to transcribe from the original manuscript as imaged here, showing the penultimate line a third lower, and the repeated last line?
160:
remember only the first one, which goes "Stille nacht, heilege nacht, alles schlaft, Einsam wacht, nur das
Heilege Eltern Paar, das im Stalle zu Bethlehem war, bei dem himmlischen Kind, bei dem himmlischen kind." How did it happen that those Germans brought a variant version over to the U.S. in the 19th century?
1520:
a) As others have pointed out, the German lyrics are regularly used in the
English-speaking world, so they ought to be kept. b) Only the three German verses shown overleaf are used in Germany; the original verses 3 to 5 are broadly unknown. c) How is the text at stillenacht.at (which is now twice in
1412:
A few problems with the lyrics. First, there are only three verses of each. The original German version has six verses and the John
Freeman Young has four verses. Second, the German version doesn't really help much for the majority of users on the English project. Without a direct translation of the
1391:
I agree fully with the above comment. There are some editors here on
Knowledge that claim that if any prominent singer puts out a version of this song, that version should be included on that page. But I also know that in the studies I have done about religious Christmas hymns, the general consensus
877:
I'm not sure that we need to confirm the notability down the song level, but if that's the best way, then determining if the single charted would be the correct way of determining that. Quite often, the song is simply included in an album and not released as a single though so this would drastically
331:
Will it be better that perhaps we can amend the structure of the recordings section? I think it might make sense to have the recordings listed in different groups. We should have them listed under artist and album, and yet we should sort them into
English recordings, German recordings and recordings
159:
The
Lutheran Church Missouri Synod, whose member were German speakers in the 19th century, had a different set of lyrics, which are used today in some of their churches even though services are in English. They were printed in a Youth Hymnal in the 1890s. I believe all the verses were different, but
1130:
Not sure what you mean - the text is almost the same as the one currently in the German article. The only differences are some spelling variations, (because the German article clings closer to the original spelling) and the difference between "Gnade" (grace) and "Gnaden" (its plural), which is both
550:
I am curious as to what is wrong with this link that it keeps getting removed. It's obviously not spam, considering it is a valid link and is in reference to the article. But what's wrong with posting a link to your own website? For example, let's say I discover a new type of frog, and I want to
269:
Not only do I agree that the recordings section be removed as it is woefully incomplete and ridiculously selective, but I would also query why a reference to a Damien Rice cover "With modified lyrics" is in the Trivia section and yet a reference to the Simon and
Garfunkel cover -- with the original
1917:
that was recently added claims, or not, the net effect of the recent edits is that a very weak statement was added, "It has been claimed that that Mohr wanted to give the population of
Oberndorf a simple song in German with guitar accompaniment." This is so banal and based on an obscure source, it
1731:
Asked and answered, Walter. The consensus is to retain them; in order to remove any form of German lyrics from this article you'll have to gain a consensus. We use the modern lyrics in the article because there's no reason to have lyrics that are not currently in use while omitting the widely used
1656:
To further comment here, it makes sense to have equal numbers of verses in both German and
English. As Michael Bednarek has pointed out, two of the original five German verses are unknown and unused; and as I have pointed out, only three verses are normally sung in English. Moreover, right now the
1538:
I've noticed that, for whatever reason, for the past several decades only three verses of any given Christmas carol are published in collections. I'm not sure why this is (it used to annoy me greatly), but there it is. It's also the case that vocalists only sing three verses of any given Christmas
1428:
I don't see any of those things as a problem, and I enjoy having the German lyrics here. Many English speakers are interested in the German lyrics and many in fact know them a bit and sing them from time to time, and many English-language recording artists often include the German version on their
566:
Actually, that's already not allowed. :) But I understand the general point. There is an inherent conflict of interest between the desire to help readers of the encyclopedia find what they are interested in (good) and to use the encyclopedia as a way of getting people interested in/using your own
1983:
in the "On this day" section on December 24th, so I figured editors here might be interested in improving it before then. There are no major issues with it that I can see, but it's also rather short and I feel certain it could be significantly expanded if interested editors had a go at it. I'd be
1895:
You could be right Gerda but the legend wasn't mentioned in the source they provided. As to whether something that did not exist until 1954 can be considered a legend I suspect that will be interpreted differently by each editor/reader. I know this article is on a few active editors watchlists so
1107:
Why has nobody noticed that the presented German lyrics are riddled with error? Referring to the German page Stille Nacht, a German Hymnal, and my own knowledge of the German Song, this presentation is obviously wrong. I don't know whether this is some sort of original text or if the writer was
637:
On December 28, 2006 I obtained an interlibrary loan of "Carols for Christmas Tide," edited by the Rev. J. Freeman Young, published in New York by Daniel Dana, Jr. in 1859. The first of the seven carols in this 16-page collection was Young's "Silent Night! Holy Night!" This is, to the best of my
1473:
Is there some reason that the section on the lyrics can't be improved rather than removed? I would also note that there isn't any mention of the four verse version in the article at the moment. There is sourced info about the six verse version and it mentions that the three verses are the "most
1505:
I don't see that Wikisource has anything to do with this article one way or another, except possibly as a reference/citation/EL. There's no reason to remove any information/text/lyrics from this article simply because it exists, in part or in whole or in a different or more complete form, on
150:
Rev. John Freeman Young (1820-1885) translated three verses of "Stille Nacht" when he was assistant rector at Trinity Church (Episcopal) in New York City (1860-67). His version of the 1st, 6th, and 2nd verses of Joseph Mohr's original text first appeared in 1863 when it was published in "The
1142:
Because the original German version is twice as long, the layout will never be perfect. An anonymous editor just aligned the English version to the top, which is a matter of taste, but it does increase the impression that the German version corresponded verse by verse with the English
995:
I think there's room for all three versions on this page. The American version is not wholly traditional either and has some slightly daring harmonies – nothing wrong with daring. The Schumann-Heink version is the version least easy to most ears; I wouldn't mind if it were removed. --
1760:
I didn't actually ask anything so. I was responding to the question as to whether we should go with the modern lyrics or original. I stated my opinion. I was not the editor who removed the lyrics and I suspect that when that editor stumbles onto this article, it will happen here as
99:
Why are there Portuguese lyrics? English, okay, it's the English Knowledge. German, okay, it was originally written in German. But the article says it is sung in 300 languages... why do we show Portuguese over any of the other 297? I'd say just leave the English and German lyrics.
388:
I've made amendments to some of the recordings I've listed and deleted some that might not be notable enough for this article. Will it be better that we tracked down the names of the albums from where these recordings came from? It might show people that we have been researching.
1918:
should be removed. As for the source given by Gerda, it could be the basis for a whole new section or spin-off article, although I suspect that most of it is of very limited interest to English-language readers. Even the DE article mentions them only summarily in passing. --
238:
Is it true that the English version first became popular/was first created during the First World War, when German troops were singing the German version in the trenches, and the British troops heard it and translated it into English, or is this just an urban myth?
1353:
There's no evidence anywhere that this one carol prompted the Christmas Truce, and the title of the book, while obviously an echo title, refers to the fact that there was no shooting over Christmas, rather than referring only or specifically to this carol.
151:
Sunday-School Service and Tune Book." These are the same three verses that are used today in English-language hymnals. Rev. Young later became the second Episcopal Bishop of Florida (1867-85). His grave is in the Old City Cemetery in Jacksonville, Florida.
855:
by a given popular music artist (e.g. on a compilation) but have no idea from what album (if any) it originated. On this basis, what reasonable criteria can we use to determine whether a given version is notable enough to be worthy of inclusion? —
824:
Should we restrict the list? If so, how? It would be good to restrict recent entries to those where both the artist and album have articles. This would confirm notability of both individually. Although it doesn't guarantee the popularity of either.
426:
Some recording dates might be unknown, or imprecise. Sometimes we'll only have years instead of dates of recording, or dates of release instead of dates of recording. Dates also require citations, whereas alphabetical only requires an ability to
270:
lyrics but backing from the news -- was apparently removed some time back. In all honesty, who the hell cares about Damien Rice? What makes him better than anyone else who has ever recorded the song that he be mentioned in the trivia section...?
1318:, German troops singing the carol were overheard by British troops – who promptly joined in, singing the English translation. This caused both sides to exchange Christmas greetings with each other, and ultimately culminated in the (unofficial)
850:
Notability of an album does not equate to notability of a particular track on it. It might not even have been released on an album - your suggestion would preclude listing of such recordings. In either case, one might know of a recording of
295:
I agree with the first guy... The Trivia section is pointless, and the last statement has been taken out by me because it's just ridiculous. Every Christmas carol has mondegreens. Not only that, but the Damien Rice cover isn't really notable.
1716:
Wikisource has the "modern" lyrics. I don't see why we need them in the article (and I don't see why we need them in the article at all). I did see lyrics removed from other Christmas carol articles for this very reason over the past week.
2061:, why are nine separate chart tables with one or two entries a better way to present the info than a simple bulleted list as in the preceding "In film" section? The artists aren't even linked (although one doesn't have a WP article). —
983:
That version is beautiful! But after listening to a few seconds from the (English) U.S. Army one, I realized you're right - beautiful or not, they aren't the harmonies we normally associate with the song. I removed it from the page.
1239:
I think the text in the original autograph (given below in the article) and the first edition (which I added) are probably worth mentioning in the article, since they probably had the composer's involvement; but not other variations.
641:
The other six carols in this publication include: "Earth Today Rejoices," "Good Christian Men Rejoice," "Here Is Joy For Every Age," "Earthly Friends Will Change And Falter," "Royal Day That Chasest Gloom," and "Good King Wenceslas."
465:
I tend to agree, but there's probably certain recording that are worth being mentioned if they meet objective criteria, such as selling a certain number of copies or appearing on a Billboard or other international music chart.
2056:
includes "If a list is simple, it is generally better to use one of the standard Knowledge list formats instead of a table. Lists are easier to maintain than tables, and are often easier to read." With these in mind:... For
528:"The version of the melody that is generally sung today differs slightly (particularly in the final strain) from Gruber's original." Is the original meoldy included on the site, or just the more familiar version? --
2076:
Excellent point. The tables are likely there because there are table-based templates, that have the details and reference embedded, but the details could be represented in prose, but should not be blanked entirely.
900:
If you are going to talk about the history of Stille Nacht (Silent Night), then you should also have a copy of the original song version with all six verses included instead of jumping from verse 1 to verse 6.
1542:, I can confirm that (in my opinion at least) it's pretty rarely heard/sung. As to whether the fourth English verse should be included in the article, that's a matter for consensus to determine, I think.
638:
knowledge, the earliest publication of this classic translation of "Stille Nacht! Heilige Nacht!" As I understand the history of this carol, it was earlier thought that the first publication was in 1863.
174:
When I load this page, the "History" section begins with, "Sarah has been with her hottiesThe carol..." I went to edit it, but there, the text is clean. Someone with technical skill, please look into it.
1040:@Michael Bednarek: On the point of the Schumann-Heink version, I agree that it's not so great, but it's not so bad that I'd remove it if all three will work. Now that I've had some time to consider, it
1896:
hopefully they will add their thoughts. As you point out we might get more input as Christmas approaches. If not we could make a request at the wikiprojects that are attached to the page. Regards.
1823:
1556:
I have seen contents of lyrics and other short pieces removed because they are in Wikisource, but I don't see a policy or guideline to support it. As for current German lyrics, the orginal
754:
372:
I've tagged this section and plan to take a razor to in a couple weeks. We should only list recordings that are somehow notable, not just every time somebody records the song.
1377:
it is not a "defining characteristic" of any of their careers. Thus, a specific singer's category (even Enya's Gaelic version which I enjoy) does not belong with this article.
362:
I suggest the section be removed. It's not feasible to list the thousands of recordings of this tune. The main use of this list is probably for spam and self-promotion.
2052:
advises that tables "should be used only when appropriate; sometimes the information in a table may be better presented as prose paragraphs or as an embedded list" and
1827:
950:
1936:. I appreciate your time in looking at things. Please feel free to remove it. I only tried to paraphrase what was in the source as Google Translate presented it.
1608:, so if we are going to retain that we need to change the header (which now says "Mohr's German lyrics") to indicate that we are quoting modern lyrics instead.
645:
This information was posted to the Christmas International Group at Yahoo on Dec. 29, 2006 (Message 6253), and subsequently to the Silent Night Group at Yahoo.
254:
It may or may not be true. SOme sources say Silent Night wasn't popular in the US until after the First World War, where US troops heard the Germans sing it.
1702:, and I knee-jerk reverted them because I didn't read the edit summary. Anyway, can you make whatever edit you deem necessary to make the heading accurate?
828:
As for the second issue, the artist is not from the album, the artist recorded the song and released it on the album. It would be better formatted "Artist
1675:
I agree that the heading "Mohr's German lyrics" is inappropriate (the interested reader can find them at the linked German Wikisource entry). The article
1478:
among others. I too oppose their removal but would fully support any improvements to the lyrics section as well as added info about the various versions.
954:
1459:
which are different than the German version we have. There have been many instances of removing content, particularly lyrics, if they are in Wikisource.
488:
OK, we include the German version because it was the original. We include the English because it's the English Wiki. Why do we have Dutch and Gaelic?
1392:
has to be putting a limit on what versions are featured on such sections and that this should be regulated. I share that feeling completely. Thanks. --
593:
Point taken. So as you have expanded this topic to references, you're saying that a researcher may not post to Knowledge, only to their own websites?
658:
1822:
I'd have thought the Nazis were smart enough not to try to tamper with the lyrics of Silent Night... at least not before the Final Victory.--
1685:
for the version now commonly used. We could do the same and simply use "German lyrics" as the heading, or omit a heading as it's obvious. --
403:
This is just me being a stickler, but can we put them in chronlogical order please! I'll do a few, but I'm only on here for about 3 minutes.
1115:
1088:
1067:
616:
280:
125:
What Wikisource does or does not contain is not a consequential factor in determining the appropriate content for an encyclopaedia article.
1161:
I trimmed the anonymous & rarely-seen fourth verse from the English version, to leave the three aligned German & English verses. —
634:
The first known publication of John Freeman Young translation, "Silent Night, Holy Night" was in 1859, not 1863 are previously believed.
179:
Hi, I was the one who reverted that edit as vandalism - and you must have been looking at it about the same time I was taking that out.
1188:
1914:
1539:
carol on their albums. Maybe "Silent Night" is an exception to this since the verses are so short, but looking at the fourth verse now
1747:
112:
Given we already have the lyrics in wikisource, do we still need to keep the English lyrics in the article? Would it be redundent? --
1798:
Should the altered Nazi version of "Silent Night" wehich makes no mention to anything religious be included or at least mentioned? --
1139:
The English one is not a direct translation of that version; placing them side by side will mislead some readers into thinking it is.
1261:
917:
551:
write a wiki abut it. I would most likely list my own website as an external link so people could read about the frog's discovery.
309:
It's gone. The information has been incorporated into other sections. (Or discarded - LBJ liking the song is really irrelevant.)
1196:
700:
86:
Not necessarily. But I have just created a redirect page so whoever is looking for the song under its German title will find it.
1626:
Some of my favorite recorded versions include the fourth verse. Of course, those versions are several decades old themselves. --
1148:
Since we can always point to the German page, I'm wondering if it wouldn't be better to remove the German version altogether. —
571:: well, you shouldn't add refs to your own work, so you'll just have to wait for someone else to do it. And if that's true for
957:. The presentation of Silent Night in a symphonic choral version just seems ... right, especially for the German version. –
664:
2136:
2005:
649:
533:
347:
1657:
verses in the wiki article match up perfectly in terms of translation, so that's another reason not to change anything.
598:
556:
1984:
happy to help out, of course, but as this isn't remotely my field I fear I have very little to contribute. Any takers?
1311:
2082:
2039:
2024:
1773:
1722:
1579:
1496:
1464:
1418:
1015:
974:
934:
883:
840:
777:
1474:
frequently sung" ones. As to their being on wikisource that is not a reason for there removal from this article per
1923:
1690:
1526:
1413:
six verses, it's incomprehensible to most readers. Finally, the lyrics are in wikisource. I propose removing them.
1222:
1001:
735:
38:
1812:
1373:
Just to get this on the record this song has been sung by thousands if not millions of people over the years. Per
122:
Because they are relatively short, and people looking up this article would most likely expect to see the lyrics?
417:
Sorry, I'll read before I edit in future, but in chronological order seems to make more sense than Alphabetical
1799:
1681:
1676:
929:
There aren't six versed in common English versions, and the original lyrics are better suited to wikisource. --
673:
529:
1119:
1092:
1071:
620:
284:
1305:
I've removed this newly added paragraph from the History section as lacking complete accuracy or relevance:
1299:
1192:
594:
552:
659:
http://www.hymnsandcarolsofchristmas.com/Hymns_and_Carols/Notes_On_Carols/silent_night_holy_night_notes.htm
2078:
2035:
2020:
1886:
1850:
1769:
1743:
1718:
1707:
1662:
1613:
1575:
1547:
1511:
1492:
1460:
1438:
1414:
1359:
1245:
1229:
1011:
970:
930:
879:
836:
773:
669:
1933:
1919:
1686:
1522:
1010:
I too think there's room for three versions on the page, so why do you insist on removing the second? --
997:
792:
762:
731:
456:
2124:
1735:
1111:
1084:
1063:
913:
905:
335:
276:
79:
2016:
1941:
1901:
1869:
1765:
1540:
1483:
1448:
1382:
408:
1536:
I can't comment on whether a 4-verse version is used much in English. If it is, it ought to added.
1187:(Mohr) is marked largo; the 1860 autograph (Gruber) reproduced in the article is marked moderato.
390:
339:
2132:
2118:
1631:
1397:
1149:
514:
1506:
Wikisource. The two projects are different and separate, the same way Commons and Wikidata are.
1136:
That said - do we really need the original 6 verse version? There are several problems with it:
489:
467:
432:
373:
310:
1843:
969:
They're both in German. The new version uses unconventional harmonies and should be removed. --
2100:
2066:
1882:
1861:
1846:
1739:
1703:
1658:
1609:
1543:
1507:
1434:
1355:
1339:
1241:
1225:
394:
343:
244:
224:
Kiyoshi kono yoru hoshi wa hikari sukui nomiko wa mabune no naka ni nemuri tamo-o. itoyasuku.
203:
191:
113:
47:
17:
230:
Kiyoshi kono yoru miko no emi ni, megumi no miyo no ashita no hikari kagayakeri, hogarakani.
219:
1374:
1288:
1269:
1207:
1166:
1046:
1026:
986:
959:
788:
758:
665:
http://www.hymnsandcarolsofchristmas.com/Hymns_and_Carols/Biographies/john_freeman_young.htm
452:
227:
Kiyoshi kono yoru mitsuge ukeshi makibitotachi wa miko no mimae ni nukazukinu, kashikomite.
2019:. However, the tables might be overkill, but otherwise, they should remain in the article.
1322:, with French, British, and German troops fraternizing on Christmas Eve and Christmas Day.
544:
2001:
1991:
1319:
909:
687:
At last, what's the exact date? The article says 24th of December, it is not mentioned on
493:
471:
436:
377:
314:
207:
195:
136:
1768:
addresses it pretty well and so the local consensus is now against community consensus.
1937:
1897:
1865:
1815:, which indeed intended to replace Silent Night, but was not a version but an entirely
1479:
1378:
861:
650:
http://www.hymnsandcarolsofchristmas.com/Hymns_and_Carols/silent_night_holy_night-1.htm
423:
Chronology hasn't affected the song itself at all. It's a somewhat meaningless metric.
404:
180:
630:
First known publication of John Freeman Young translation, "Silent Night, Holy Night."
2128:
2114:
2053:
1976:
1627:
1475:
1452:
1393:
510:
363:
297:
255:
211:
2096:
2062:
2058:
1987:
1184:
750:
580:
240:
101:
75:
2140:
2104:
2086:
2070:
2028:
1944:
1927:
1904:
1890:
1872:
1854:
1831:
1802:
1777:
1751:
1726:
1711:
1694:
1666:
1635:
1617:
1583:
1551:
1530:
1515:
1500:
1486:
1468:
1456:
1442:
1422:
1401:
1385:
1363:
1292:
1273:
1249:
1233:
1211:
1170:
1152:
1123:
1096:
1075:
1050:
1030:
1019:
1005:
990:
978:
963:
938:
921:
887:
865:
844:
796:
781:
766:
739:
716:
677:
624:
602:
584:
560:
537:
518:
497:
475:
460:
440:
412:
398:
381:
366:
351:
318:
300:
288:
258:
248:
214:
183:
164:
141:
116:
1535:
1315:
1284:
1265:
1223:
http://www.henle.de/blog/en/2012/12/24/%e2%80%98silent-night%e2%80%99-revisited/
1203:
1162:
727:
723:
704:
692:
688:
503:
161:
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
2049:
1997:
874:
Yes, my suggestion could preclude the inclusion of some entries, but not many.
506:
128:
1980:
1968:
1202:
Good catch, thanks. I've replaced "sprightly, dance-like" with "moderato". —
857:
696:
567:
site (bad). Suppose you write an article about frogs and it's published in
1279:
The category appears to have been added when the infobox was added in this
1964:
1764:
As far as an encyclopedic value of the modern lyrics versus the original,
1699:
Recently an IP changed "Mohr's German lyrics" to "Modern German lyrics"
1044:
good that we have a solo performance in addition to the choral ones. –
576:
87:
1108:
writing it incorrectly from memory, but something needs to be done.
1842:
To which extent should we report the legends around this carol? See
1260:
This article has four sound illustrations. Why is it categorized in
955:
File:Festliches Konzert - Bekannte Weihnachtslieder Stille Nacht.ogg
545:
An arrangement for Guitar, Flute and Violin for free use in services
1963:
648:
The sheet music (and cover) have been scanned and can be seen at:
25:
1178:
2092:
Propose to implement as follows if there are no objections.
1491:
OSE doen't apply in this case. This is a wikisource issue.
1024:
So we're all agreed, then? Putting the third one back. –
220:
http://www.visit-salzburg.net/travel/silentnightlyrics.htm
755:
Sounds of the Season: The Taylor Swift Holiday Collection
332:
in other languages (including multilingual renditions).
1994:
as the most relevant Wikiprojects with recent activity.)
1700:
1280:
712:
509:? Isn't that one important enough to belong here too!?
1179:
Gruber's original ... was a sprightly, dance-like tune
615:... would be great if you look through the history. --
1956:
420:
Sorry, I really disagree with this, for two reasons:
1877:
I understood the IP as also wanting to add that the
1343:
Silent Night: The Remarkable Christmas Truce of 1914
654:Both low and high resolution scans are available.
722:The 24th is correct. I corrected the entries at
1308:
951:File:Gruber - Schumann-Heink - Stille Nacht.ogg
1975:Hi all. "Silent Night" was first performed on
1262:Category:Song articles missing an audio sample
1979:in 1818, and consequently will appear on the
8:
1433:". I personally oppose removing the lyrics.
802:Recorded versions by popular artists section
2034:Limiting the table of contents is helpful.
1881:exists. Let's get closer to Christmas ;) --
1060:The "history" of the song must be closed!
451:The section is not relevant to the article.
1733:
1283:. How remove category but keep infobox? --
813:I don't know why it is formatted "Artist
1447:But both sets of lyrics are incomplete.
711:
1960:s 200th anniversary is on December 24th
1457:six in German, with English translation
1332:
202:What are the lyrics to Silent Night in
1971:(c. 1860) of the carol by Franz Gruber
147:When were the English lyrics written?
44:Do not edit the contents of this page.
1824:2001:A61:260C:C01:91EA:BCEF:611B:6FAE
1757:Please be sure to sign your comments.
1429:Christmas albums. The same goes for "
7:
695:and it was mentioned equally on the
1602:, right now the wiki article reads
657:Notes concerning the carol are at:
327:Restructuring section on recordings
1218:on the history of the musical text
703:for the 24 and 25 of December... -
24:
2110:Transcription of original needed
1183:Is there a source for this? The
878:reduce the number of entries. --
595:Bob the Wikipedian, a WikiDragon
553:Bob the Wikipedian, a WikiDragon
74:Shouldn't this page be moved to
29:
1945:03:46, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
1928:02:47, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
1905:20:30, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
1891:19:39, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
1873:19:20, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
1855:18:39, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
1832:14:03, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
1677:de:Stille Nacht, heilige Nacht
1402:02:00, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
1386:20:05, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
1250:13:10, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
1234:10:03, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
1:
2141:00:21, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
1778:20:36, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
1752:19:44, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
1727:18:25, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
1712:09:10, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
1695:08:06, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
1667:05:47, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
1636:00:38, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
1618:05:47, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
1584:01:18, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
1574:. I suppose we can leave it.
1552:01:09, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
1531:00:56, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
1516:23:54, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
1501:23:46, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
1487:22:51, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
1469:22:05, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
1443:21:42, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
1423:20:31, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
1364:00:06, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
1345:. New York: Free Press, 2001.
1293:19:01, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
1274:16:59, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
1153:17:58, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
1124:16:38, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
1076:02:29, 25 December 2010 (UTC)
1051:12:01, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
1031:11:57, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
939:05:42, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
922:00:17, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
888:01:16, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
866:00:50, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
845:01:29, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
797:17:09, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
782:21:30, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
767:21:10, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
753:did a cover of it for her EP
740:10:41, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
717:16:26, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
625:18:27, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
519:14:12, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
476:22:51, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
461:01:03, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
441:20:24, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
413:13:24, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
399:13:01, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
382:23:15, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
352:04:29, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
319:23:21, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
301:04:59, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
259:05:01, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
215:22:49, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
142:21:58, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
117:23:23, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
2006:10:17, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
1813:Hohe Nacht der klaren Sterne
1097:16:57, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
1020:18:36, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
1006:12:20, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
991:11:10, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
979:08:32, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
964:07:58, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
678:17:03, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
538:17:34, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
498:08:06, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
367:20:50, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
289:15:04, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
249:16:10, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
184:14:38, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
165:21:42, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
2105:14:46, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
1986:(PS. Cross-posting this to
1212:08:02, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
1171:08:02, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
1056:Annie Lennox sung it - WOW!
190:Lyrics in other languages (
2157:
810:It's getting rather large.
234:Origins of English version
1811:Or are you talking about
1803:22:44, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
1197:11:08, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
663:Young's Biography is at:
603:21:16, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
585:20:40, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
561:19:53, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
104:18:29, 25 Dec 2004 (UTC)
82:19:51, Dec 5, 2004 (UTC)
2087:02:37, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
2071:14:42, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
2029:01:56, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
2015:Makes perfect sense per
1682:Evangelisches Gesangbuch
1081:So did Sinead O'Connor
896:Not the original version
757:.Can We PLEASE add it?--
90:20:24, Dec 7, 2004 (UTC)
1600:traute hochheilige Paar
1562:traute hochheilige Paar
1320:Christmas Truce of 1914
1300:Christmas truce of 1914
683:24 or 25th of December?
155:Alternate German lyrics
78:, its original title? -
1972:
1932:Thanks for your input
1909:Whether the organ was
1453:different translations
1324:
1967:
1860:Thanks for this link
1564:, where they elevate
42:of past discussions.
484:Languages to include
1800:Whoop whoop pull up
1596:traute heilige Paar
1558:traute heilige Paar
1256:Sound illustrations
1185:1820-1825 autograph
1131:possible in German.
530:Scottandrewhutchins
1973:
2127:comment added by
1995:
1754:
1738:comment added by
1340:Stanley Weintraub
1114:comment added by
1087:comment added by
1066:comment added by
949:I've swapped out
925:
908:comment added by
835:" (bold mine). --
354:
338:comment added by
291:
279:comment added by
67:
66:
54:
53:
48:current talk page
18:Talk:Silent Night
2148:
2143:
1985:
1934:Michael Bednarek
1920:Michael Bednarek
1687:Michael Bednarek
1537:
1523:Michael Bednarek
1346:
1337:
1310:In 1914, on the
1126:
1099:
1078:
998:Michael Bednarek
924:
902:
787:Done.Thank you--
732:Michael Bednarek
709:
333:
274:
135:
63:
56:
55:
33:
32:
26:
2156:
2155:
2151:
2150:
2149:
2147:
2146:
2145:
2122:
2112:
2013:
2011:Charting covers
1962:
1840:
1796:
1560:is now usually
1410:
1371:
1351:
1350:
1349:
1338:
1334:
1325:
1303:
1258:
1220:
1181:
1109:
1105:
1082:
1061:
1058:
947:
903:
898:
804:
748:
715:
705:
685:
632:
613:
611:Semi-protection
548:
526:
524:Original melody
486:
360:
329:
267:
236:
200:
172:
157:
133:
110:
97:
80:leigh (φθόγγος)
72:
59:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
2154:
2152:
2111:
2108:
2090:
2089:
2079:Walter Görlitz
2044:
2043:
2036:Walter Görlitz
2021:Walter Görlitz
2012:
2009:
1961:
1955:
1954:
1953:
1952:
1951:
1950:
1949:
1948:
1947:
1907:
1839:
1836:
1835:
1834:
1820:
1809:
1795:
1792:
1791:
1790:
1789:
1788:
1787:
1786:
1785:
1784:
1783:
1782:
1781:
1780:
1770:Walter Görlitz
1762:
1758:
1719:Walter Görlitz
1670:
1669:
1653:
1652:
1651:
1650:
1649:
1648:
1647:
1646:
1645:
1644:
1643:
1642:
1641:
1640:
1639:
1638:
1624:
1623:
1622:
1621:
1620:
1594:: In terms of
1576:Walter Görlitz
1493:Walter Görlitz
1461:Walter Görlitz
1415:Walter Görlitz
1409:
1406:
1405:
1404:
1370:
1367:
1348:
1347:
1331:
1330:
1326:
1307:
1302:
1297:
1296:
1295:
1257:
1254:
1253:
1252:
1219:
1216:
1215:
1214:
1180:
1177:
1176:
1175:
1174:
1173:
1156:
1155:
1146:
1145:
1144:
1140:
1133:
1132:
1116:67.212.110.120
1104:
1101:
1089:188.85.148.232
1068:208.127.128.71
1057:
1054:
1038:
1037:
1036:
1035:
1034:
1033:
1022:
1012:Walter Görlitz
1008:
971:Walter Görlitz
946:
943:
942:
941:
931:Walter Görlitz
897:
894:
893:
892:
891:
890:
880:Walter Görlitz
875:
869:
868:
837:Walter Görlitz
822:
821:
820:" (bold mine).
811:
803:
800:
785:
784:
774:Walter Görlitz
747:
744:
743:
742:
701:On this day...
684:
681:
670:XmasHistoryGuy
631:
628:
617:84.153.110.246
612:
609:
608:
607:
606:
605:
588:
587:
547:
541:
525:
522:
502:How about the
485:
482:
481:
480:
479:
478:
449:
448:
447:
446:
445:
444:
443:
430:
429:
428:
424:
385:
384:
359:
356:
328:
325:
324:
323:
322:
321:
304:
303:
281:172.209.19.200
266:
263:
262:
261:
235:
232:
199:
188:
187:
186:
171:
168:
156:
153:
145:
144:
126:
123:
109:
108:English Lyrics
106:
96:
93:
92:
91:
71:
68:
65:
64:
52:
51:
34:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2153:
2144:
2142:
2138:
2134:
2130:
2126:
2120:
2116:
2109:
2107:
2106:
2102:
2098:
2093:
2088:
2084:
2080:
2075:
2074:
2073:
2072:
2068:
2064:
2060:
2055:
2054:MOS:NO-TABLES
2051:
2047:
2041:
2037:
2033:
2032:
2031:
2030:
2026:
2022:
2018:
2010:
2008:
2007:
2003:
1999:
1993:
1989:
1982:
1978:
1977:Christmas Eve
1970:
1966:
1959:
1958:Silent Night'
1946:
1943:
1939:
1935:
1931:
1930:
1929:
1925:
1921:
1916:
1912:
1908:
1906:
1903:
1899:
1894:
1893:
1892:
1888:
1884:
1880:
1876:
1875:
1874:
1871:
1867:
1863:
1859:
1858:
1857:
1856:
1852:
1848:
1844:
1837:
1833:
1829:
1825:
1821:
1818:
1814:
1810:
1807:
1806:
1805:
1804:
1801:
1793:
1779:
1775:
1771:
1767:
1763:
1759:
1756:
1755:
1753:
1749:
1745:
1741:
1737:
1730:
1729:
1728:
1724:
1720:
1715:
1714:
1713:
1709:
1705:
1701:
1698:
1697:
1696:
1692:
1688:
1684:
1683:
1678:
1674:
1673:
1672:
1671:
1668:
1664:
1660:
1655:
1654:
1637:
1633:
1629:
1625:
1619:
1615:
1611:
1607:
1606:
1601:
1597:
1593:
1590:
1589:
1588:
1587:
1586:
1585:
1581:
1577:
1571:
1567:
1563:
1559:
1555:
1554:
1553:
1549:
1545:
1541:
1534:
1533:
1532:
1528:
1524:
1519:
1518:
1517:
1513:
1509:
1504:
1503:
1502:
1498:
1494:
1490:
1489:
1488:
1485:
1481:
1477:
1472:
1471:
1470:
1466:
1462:
1458:
1454:
1450:
1446:
1445:
1444:
1440:
1436:
1432:
1427:
1426:
1425:
1424:
1420:
1416:
1408:Remove lyrics
1407:
1403:
1399:
1395:
1390:
1389:
1388:
1387:
1384:
1380:
1376:
1368:
1366:
1365:
1361:
1357:
1344:
1341:
1336:
1333:
1329:
1323:
1321:
1317:
1313:
1312:Western Front
1306:
1301:
1298:
1294:
1290:
1286:
1282:
1278:
1277:
1276:
1275:
1271:
1267:
1263:
1255:
1251:
1247:
1243:
1238:
1237:
1236:
1235:
1231:
1227:
1224:
1217:
1213:
1209:
1205:
1201:
1200:
1199:
1198:
1194:
1190:
1189:37.205.58.146
1186:
1172:
1168:
1164:
1160:
1159:
1158:
1157:
1154:
1151:
1147:
1141:
1138:
1137:
1135:
1134:
1129:
1128:
1127:
1125:
1121:
1117:
1113:
1103:German Lyrics
1102:
1100:
1098:
1094:
1090:
1086:
1079:
1077:
1073:
1069:
1065:
1055:
1053:
1052:
1049:
1048:
1043:
1032:
1029:
1028:
1023:
1021:
1017:
1013:
1009:
1007:
1003:
999:
994:
993:
992:
989:
988:
982:
981:
980:
976:
972:
968:
967:
966:
965:
962:
961:
956:
952:
944:
940:
936:
932:
928:
927:
926:
923:
919:
915:
911:
907:
895:
889:
885:
881:
876:
873:
872:
871:
870:
867:
863:
859:
854:
849:
848:
847:
846:
842:
838:
834:
831:
826:
819:
816:
812:
809:
808:
807:
801:
799:
798:
794:
790:
783:
779:
775:
771:
770:
769:
768:
764:
760:
756:
752:
745:
741:
737:
733:
729:
725:
721:
720:
719:
718:
714:
710:
708:
702:
698:
694:
690:
682:
680:
679:
675:
671:
667:
666:
661:
660:
655:
652:
651:
646:
643:
639:
635:
629:
627:
626:
622:
618:
610:
604:
600:
596:
592:
591:
590:
589:
586:
582:
578:
574:
570:
565:
564:
563:
562:
558:
554:
546:
542:
540:
539:
535:
531:
523:
521:
520:
516:
512:
508:
505:
500:
499:
495:
491:
483:
477:
473:
469:
464:
463:
462:
458:
454:
450:
442:
438:
434:
431:
425:
422:
421:
419:
418:
416:
415:
414:
410:
406:
402:
401:
400:
396:
392:
387:
386:
383:
379:
375:
371:
370:
369:
368:
365:
357:
355:
353:
349:
345:
341:
337:
326:
320:
316:
312:
308:
307:
306:
305:
302:
299:
294:
293:
292:
290:
286:
282:
278:
271:
264:
260:
257:
253:
252:
251:
250:
246:
242:
233:
231:
228:
225:
222:
221:
217:
216:
213:
209:
205:
197:
193:
189:
185:
182:
178:
177:
176:
169:
167:
166:
163:
154:
152:
148:
143:
140:
139:
132:
131:
127:
124:
121:
120:
119:
118:
115:
107:
105:
103:
94:
89:
85:
84:
83:
81:
77:
69:
62:
58:
57:
49:
45:
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
2123:— Preceding
2113:
2094:
2091:
2059:Silent Night
2048:
2045:
2017:WP:COVERSONG
2014:
1974:
1957:
1910:
1883:Gerda Arendt
1878:
1862:Gerda Arendt
1847:Gerda Arendt
1841:
1816:
1797:
1794:Nazi version
1766:WP:NOTLYRICS
1740:Softlavender
1734:— Preceding
1704:Softlavender
1680:
1659:Softlavender
1610:Softlavender
1604:
1603:
1599:
1595:
1591:
1573:
1569:
1565:
1561:
1557:
1544:Softlavender
1508:Softlavender
1435:Softlavender
1431:O Tannenbaum
1430:
1411:
1372:
1356:Softlavender
1352:
1342:
1335:
1327:
1309:
1304:
1259:
1242:Double sharp
1226:Double sharp
1221:
1182:
1106:
1083:— Preceding
1080:
1059:
1045:
1041:
1039:
1025:
985:
958:
948:
904:— Preceding
899:
853:Silent Night
852:
832:
829:
827:
823:
817:
814:
805:
786:
772:Go ahead. --
751:Taylor Swift
749:
746:Taylor Swift
706:
686:
668:
662:
656:
653:
647:
644:
640:
636:
633:
614:
572:
568:
549:
527:
501:
487:
427:alphabetize.
361:
330:
272:
268:
237:
229:
226:
223:
218:
201:
173:
158:
149:
146:
137:
129:
114:Hurricane111
111:
98:
76:Stille Nacht
73:
70:Stille Nacht
60:
43:
37:
1605:hochheilige
1449:Four verses
1316:World War I
1110:—Preceding
1062:—Preceding
1047:Philosopher
1027:Philosopher
987:Philosopher
960:Philosopher
910:Kargandarr
806:Two issues
789:BellaFan262
759:BellaFan262
728:December 25
724:December 24
693:December 25
689:December 24
504:Jingle Cats
453:Yaki-gaijin
334:—Preceding
275:—Preceding
88:<KF: -->
36:This is an
2050:MOS:TABLES
1915:the source
1808:There was?
1679:cites the
1369:Categories
1328:References
833:album name
818:album name
358:Recordings
1981:Main page
1969:Autograph
1938:MarnetteD
1898:MarnetteD
1866:MarnetteD
1817:different
1572:most holy
1568:high holy
1566:holy' to
1480:MarnetteD
1379:MarnetteD
1375:WP:CATDEF
1150:Sebastian
697:Main Page
405:Dragon909
181:Cricket02
95:languages
61:Archive 1
2137:contribs
2129:Quickest
2125:unsigned
2115:Quickest
1992:WP:SONGS
1748:contribs
1736:unsigned
1732:lyrics.
1628:Khajidha
1394:Jgstokes
1112:unsigned
1085:unsigned
1064:unsigned
918:contribs
906:unsigned
511:Asteriks
348:contribs
336:unsigned
298:IronCrow
277:unsigned
256:IronCrow
212:Angie Y.
210:, etc.?
204:Japanese
192:Japanese
2097:Ojorojo
2063:Ojorojo
1838:Legends
1598:versus
1592:Comment
1314:during
691:but on
507:version
391:Yip1982
340:Yip1982
241:TomPhil
198:, etc.)
170:reverts
102:Acheron
39:archive
1911:kaputt
1879:legend
1476:WP:OSE
1285:Bensin
1266:Bensin
1204:Patrug
1163:Patrug
707:geraki
573:Nature
569:Nature
265:Trivia
208:French
196:French
162:Edison
1998:Xover
1988:WP:CM
1913:, as
1819:song?
1761:well.
945:Audio
730:. --
490:Torc2
468:Torc2
433:Torc2
374:Torc2
311:Torc2
130:zoney
16:<
2133:talk
2119:talk
2101:talk
2083:talk
2067:talk
2040:talk
2025:talk
2002:talk
1990:and
1942:Talk
1924:talk
1902:Talk
1887:talk
1870:Talk
1851:talk
1845:. --
1828:talk
1774:talk
1744:talk
1723:talk
1708:talk
1691:talk
1663:talk
1632:talk
1614:talk
1580:talk
1548:talk
1527:talk
1512:talk
1497:talk
1484:Talk
1465:talk
1455:and
1439:talk
1419:talk
1398:talk
1383:Talk
1360:talk
1289:talk
1281:edit
1270:talk
1264:? --
1246:talk
1230:talk
1208:talk
1193:talk
1167:talk
1143:one.
1120:talk
1093:talk
1072:talk
1016:talk
1002:talk
975:talk
953:for
935:talk
914:talk
884:talk
862:talk
858:Smjg
841:talk
815:from
793:talk
778:talk
763:talk
736:talk
726:and
674:talk
621:talk
599:talk
581:talk
557:talk
534:talk
515:talk
494:talk
472:talk
457:talk
437:talk
409:talk
395:talk
378:talk
364:Wake
344:talk
315:talk
285:talk
245:talk
138:talk
1570:or
920:)
699:'s
2139:)
2135:•
2103:)
2085:)
2069:)
2046::
2027:)
2004:)
1996:--
1926:)
1889:)
1853:)
1830:)
1776:)
1750:)
1746:•
1725:)
1710:)
1693:)
1665:)
1634:)
1616:)
1582:)
1550:)
1529:)
1514:)
1499:)
1467:)
1451:,
1441:)
1421:)
1400:)
1362:)
1291:)
1272:)
1248:)
1232:)
1210:)
1195:)
1169:)
1122:)
1095:)
1074:)
1042:is
1018:)
1004:)
984:–
977:)
937:)
916:•
886:)
864:)
843:)
830:on
795:)
780:)
765:)
738:)
676:)
623:)
601:)
583:)
577:Tb
559:)
536:)
517:)
496:)
474:)
459:)
439:)
411:)
397:)
380:)
350:)
346:•
317:)
287:)
247:)
206:,
194:,
2131:(
2117:(
2099:(
2095:—
2081:(
2065:(
2042:)
2038:(
2023:(
2000:(
1940:|
1922:(
1900:|
1885:(
1868:|
1849:(
1826:(
1772:(
1742:(
1721:(
1706:(
1689:(
1661:(
1630:(
1612:(
1578:(
1546:(
1525:(
1510:(
1495:(
1482:|
1463:(
1437:(
1417:(
1396:(
1381:|
1358:(
1287:(
1268:(
1244:(
1228:(
1206:(
1191:(
1165:(
1118:(
1091:(
1070:(
1014:(
1000:(
973:(
933:(
912:(
882:(
860:(
839:(
791:(
776:(
761:(
734:(
713:L
672:(
619:(
597:(
579:(
555:(
543:*
532:(
513:(
492:(
470:(
455:(
435:(
407:(
393:(
376:(
342:(
313:(
283:(
243:(
134:♣
50:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.