1122:
his first wife, Meri, while the others' marriages are considered spiritual unions" begs the question of the nature of the subsequent relationships. In law they are, or as the article says elsewhere might be, considered polygamous, or common-law marriage. This raises the question "considered" by whom? The word "married" is used of all the relationships, so someone considers them marriage, not just 'spiritual union'. Is this sentence a term used by TLC? Kody? The law? etc. --
31:
1462:. Can you really verify that "Mormon" in this case means LDS and not Fundamentalists, because if you can't then this should not go into the entry. Most people think LDS when they hear "Mormon" on its own, but when the family clearly identifies as Fundamentalist there is good reason to question this one news source and what it is implying with the statement. Should we take this to the BLP/N because I'd be glad to do that if you want me to.
606:, which I then immediately reverted.) I don't plan on doing this until it's announced whether there will be a second season, since if there is only one season for the show, I think the "Episodes" section will not be unreasonably long and should stay as is. But I do plan on making the change when a second season is announced, so I figured I'd check here to see if there were any objections or comments in anticipation of that move. Thoughts? —
1825:. Furthermore, Sherrod's United States civil suit againt Andrew Breitbart and Breitbart's editor in cheif is arguably wholly related to the topic of this event. Yet, in the polygamous Brown family's case, their notable federal suit against the governor and the attorney general of Utah are only tangential to the topic of the reality show, necessitating the subjects' being covered separately, IMO.--
1177:"She should be identified", why? Of what encyclopedic value is this identification? She was/is part of a religion that does not practice polygamy, the others are part of one that does. Also, bare in mind that the wording I deleted was suggestive in a sense that "Mormons", as in LDS mainstream Mormons, do sometimes practice polygamy. That type of language certainly does not belong.
755:
109:
about as interesting as any other reality show. Why is this not communicated in what we summarize? It appears that, instead, we're left with a tantalizing one liner without much context about the differences between the fundamentalist sects and the LDS. That one liner has little to nothing to do with her criticism of the show. What gives?
380:
the situation. Polygamy refers to a marital institution where all individuals knowingly enter into the marital arrangement. Lone Star's "bigamy" situation is not comparable to plural marriage, or any other form of polygamy and keeping this in is not informative or meaningful here. I think it ought to be removed again.
432:"Multiple marriages" is what they probably meant when the incorrectly used "polygamy". I would not object to that language. However, Lone Star was already cancelled I believe, so I'm not sure its a great example, even if its in the source. Though like I said I would not object to multiple marriages.
2406:
I was trying to fix the wedding dates for Kody and the four wives and for Aspyn and Mitch. Somehow the dates were edited to show someone's age rather than length of marriage. I tried to change "birth date and year" to "wedding date and year" but it didn't work. I'm not geeky enough to know what I did
1623:
Do you fully understand what the BLP/N is for? It is not a place where editor behavior is discussed, and I've raised no behavioral issues about you. If you think there are issues to raise concerning me then take it somewhere like AN/I. This talk page is also not the place to discuss the behavioral
1403:
because there are much stricter standards for what to include and how to source it. These are not my methods they are the encyclopedia's. I also don't think you're being honest above. You'd really care if a source called her Jain and it wasn't included? Give me a break. Please respond to the BLP
1121:
a) is it necessary to call Kody Brown "patriarch"? That word has lots of meanings in both the history of the LDS movement and feminist studies. When a word with such particular meanings is used, I wonder if a more neutral word could be found. b) To write "The only legal marriage is between Kody and
1665:
Please also note that the source for this statement is not self-published by the subject as you suggested above. It is not clear what "though a Mormon" actually means in the
Vancouver sun article and they are not quoting her using this term. The entire sentence that I removed the "though a Mormon"
601:
page. Basically, I would propose moving everything currently under the "Episodes" section of this page (including the episode descriptions) to that new page, and then reducing the main page's "Episodes" section to a list without the descriptions along with a link to the main article. (For an example
509:
As the individual who made the initial removal, I did so not out of any concerns about the sourcing, but because the example isn't really in line with the others. Leaving all questions of the definitions of bigamy vs. polygamy aside, all of the other examples, and the subject of the article itself,
1628:
as you have above. I do understand what a single purpose account is. It "is a user account or IP editor whose editing is broadly limited to one very narrow area or set of articles, or whose edits to many articles appear to be for a common purpose." Like, for instance, editing articles related to
1453:
Yes I do know what I Jain is Duke. I have a general interest in religion, not a personal interest in one religion, but that's immaterial. We do not broadcast information about someone's religion unless it is 1) related to the entry content 2) and well sourced. Leaving #1 aside, this fails #2 --
379:
are not equivalent in most ways one might consider them -- certainly not anthropologically or sociologically. The law might treat them similarly, but bigamy is almost exclusively a form of marriage where one person has married two or more individuals without divorce and without their knowledge of
326:
a prevalent topic in
American pop culture. Yes the first broadcast of the first episode already happened, but the second part of the sentence misleads as it is currently written. It also sounds awkward, like it's being written for a time capsule to be opened in 20 years, during a time when these
1488:
You can take it anywhere that you'd like; you're now cherry picking parts of sources and 'interpreting' things to fit your personal POV. Janelle herself said on the show that she was raised Mormon, but not in a polygamous setting. I can verify from that newspaper article that
Janelle is a Mormon.
126:
I think everything from "Perhaps I’m not so impressed because as a Mormon woman, I’ve lived in close quarters with the idea of polygamy since I was a wee girl." to "An idea, apparently, that is supposed to be news to the show’s viewers and reviewers", as well as the sarcastic paragraph after that
108:
Besides that fact Brooks' main point is that the show is as uninteresting to her as other reality shows are. She then goes on to point out that it is particularly uninteresting because it doesn't go into the theological aspects of plural marriage, or "the principle", and is therefore, once again
1341:
Biographical material needs to be treated with more sensitivity than other material. Is there something unclear about that? She self-identifies as a Mormon and you think this is important to the entry. I say its not important enough given the BLP concerns, given what you wrote yourself about
247:
Some of the other writers are college professors with PhDs in religious studies and related fields. That said, I think the source works for opinion more than news, but that's OK in this case since its a review of a TV series. I don't mean to disparage the site, by the way, I mean only that it
276:
Why is this paragraph in the past tense? "Sister Wives was first broadcast during a time when polygamy was a prevalent topic in
American pop culture... Big Love...had already been on the air for several years...And when Sister Wives first aired, actress Katherine Heigl was in the process of
91:
which she found uninteresting and argued raised nothing about fundamentalist polygamy that wasn't already publicly known. Raised in a conservative Mormon home, Brooks also took exception to Brown's comparison of the differences between fundamentalist and mainstream
Mormonism to that of
131:
as if it is something new and original, are all indicative that she feels this series presents nothing new that hasn't already been publicly known. That being said, you're right, the summary of the review as it stands in the article now probably can be improved. Have at it! :) —
592:
gets renewed for a second season (which seems like an almost certainty at this point, but remains unconfirmed), then the episode descriptions in the "Episode" section would make this main article grow far too long. To that end, I was kicking around the idea of creating a
1001:, and allow this article to turn into an overview of both series, with links to episode lists for seasons one and two which describe their content in greater detail. Secondly, if there is a swing in opinion for or against the programme be sure to separate it by episode.
1195:? " Because she is evidentially an lds member who is controverting her church's teachings and regulations; to many that is a VERY big deal indeed. How many more 'mainstream mormons' are doing the same thing, or at least are in agreement with it ? We don't (
2375:
Hello I watch your tv show all the wifes are very strong and increadable women my questions is for
Christine what was the name of the spine clinic you and kody took your daughter to in Michigan also when is your tv show going to be back on tv again
2275:
709:
There are originally 13 children, but Robyn's addition to the family along with her three kids brings it to 16. I believe this is clear in the article as it stands, but if not let me know what language is unclear and I'll try to clarify. —
856:
1. The first section needs to be re-titled. "Conception" is too close to "development". I think "Concept" is what was intended, but some other term, analogous to "plot synopsis" in the article of a fictional work would be preferred.
1629:
one religion almost exclusively and doing so from a very obvious POV. That said, this isn't the place to discuss such matters. If you want to discuss my behavior do so on my talk page, or at a behavior related noticeboard. Cheers.
1426:
is ? Yes, I'd care, but what I'm really not caring for is your 'good faith' shown here. You doubting my honesty is annoying, to say the least ... consider this a warning about, okay ? As for your BLP argument, I already told you ...
863:
For now I've changed it to "Concept", although I'm open to other names. I'm not a big fan of "Plot synopsis" because that to me sounds like a scripted show, not a reality show, but if you feel strongly about it I could go with it. —
897:
As polygamy is illegal in the United States, attorneys and legal experts have claimed even before the show debuted that the Browns could potentially have opened themselves up to criminal prosecution through their involvement in the
2255:
2075:
277:
developing a film about
Carolyn Jessop, a woman who fled from a polygamist sect." I'm not sure what we should do with that paragraph--attempt to grammatically correct it or just delete it as optionally relevant anyway.--
1575:
of sources can be used and other parts of those same sources can be discounted because one editor doesn't like them. Since that
Vancouver newspaper says that she is a Mormon it is enough to satisfy WP's requirement of
1163:
Unless it can be documented that she has either quit the lds church, or that she has been excommunicated by them, that she should be identified as she herself says. She did say it herself on the first episode. Cheers.
2265:
450:
didn't last anyway, but I just want to demonstrate that there are a multitude of pop culture products coming out at this time related to this subject. We could even add a note with a new citation, I suppose, that
399:
from "polygamy" to "multiple marriages"? We could also change "comes at a time that polygamy is a prevalent topic" to "comes at a time that polygamy and multiple marriages is a prevalent topic" is necessary... —
2195:
2276:
https://web.archive.org/web/20101024201649/http://tvbythenumbers.com/2010/10/19/sunday-cable-ratings-kardarshians-lead-mad-men-finale-up-rubicon-finale-down-boardwalk-empire-sonny-with-a-chance-much-more/68833
1489:
According to WP rules that source is sufficient; you don't have the right to discard parts of it. Unless you somehow discredit that source I will be using it to show that
Janelle was / is a Mormon. Cheers.
2279:
1533:
a Mormon. Only the newspaper article makes the claim that currently she is a Mormon. That's very shoddy for this information. I asked about the BLP/N because it is a noticeboard to get advice about
1581:"I also don't think you're being honest", "Look in the mirror buddy ... you're a single purpose account ... editing only pages about Mormonism and it takes 3 seconds to discern your POV ... AGF what?"
1704:
The name Mormon should not be used for anyone or any article without permission from the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. Use of this name without permission is copyright infringement.
1342:
plural marriage and the mainstream LDS church. If you insist on putting it back, I'm also saying that you need to do so in a way that is NPOV. It was not presented in that way when I removed it.
2235:
987:, to my reading the article is not blatantly biased, and this is a sensitive topic to write about. An issue here is avoidance using smaller, partisan website and sources, and strict adherence to
2205:
2256:
https://web.archive.org/web/20101010123912/http://tvbythenumbers.com/2010/10/05/sunday-cable-ratings-boardwalk-empire-mostly-stable-rubicon-still-tiny-mad-men-kardashians-dexter-lots-more/66791
2225:
2076:
https://web.archive.org/web/20101005043849/http://tvbythenumbers.com/2010/09/28/sunday-cable-ratings-boardwalk-empire-falls-rubicon-stays-low-the-glades-mad-men-kardashians-lots-more/65626
1379:
to be part of one. I haven't read anything about her quitting the lds church or having been ex-communicated by the lds church. Unless one of the above events occurred she is still lds.
2259:
1806:: "hen an individual plays a major role in a minor eventit is not generally appropriate to have an article on both the person and the event. For example, Steve Bartman redirects to
2266:
https://web.archive.org/web/20101017071120/http://tvbythenumbers.com/2010/10/12/sunday-cable-ratings-boardwalk-empire-plunges-rubicon-up-mad-men-kardashians-mlb-playoffs-more/67765
2079:
2215:
1275:
No it isn't. I didn't say the information should be kept out because of BLP, I said it shouldn't be bandied about lightly. It definitely should not go back in the same manner.
1946:
My name is
Jennifer. I would like to find a sister wife for my husband and myself but I don't know how to go about it. Do you have any suggestions? Thank you for your time.
2196:
https://web.archive.org/web/20101024133119/http://tvbythenumbers.com/2010/08/06/love-is-all-in-the-family-on-tlcs-new-series-sisters-wives-premiering-sunday-september-26/59324
1686:
2269:
552:
are a prevalent topic in American pop culture." This seemed to satisfy at least one of the objectors in this case. Do you still believe this doesn't address the problem? —
1026:
As far as your other comment, are you saying that all the letter "L"'s have been replaced by explanation points? Because I'm not seeing that here. Are you sure it isn't
487:
was a best seller for a long time very recently would be a more meaningful fact in that regard, but I guess if another source doesn't make that point we can't add it in.
2285:
2199:
997:. In two months' time the second series will be broadcast so the scope and content of this article is likely to change significantly. Editors should be sure to follow
2280:
http://tvbythenumbers.com/2010/10/19/sunday-cable-ratings-kardarshians-lead-mad-men-finale-up-rubicon-finale-down-boardwalk-empire-sonny-with-a-chance-much-more/68833
1459:
793:
2245:
2015:
1998:
2317:
2313:
2299:
2107:
2103:
2089:
1895:
1834:
1095:
I know this is a major article so I thought I'd just put it in discussion that the number of seasons is now three since the third season premiere in September.
2236:
https://web.archive.org/web/20101029202534/http://www.okmagazine.com/2010/10/nancy-grace-on-sister-wives-investigation-%E2%80%9Ckody-should-go-to-jail%E2%80%9D/
1571:
Please do it then; I don't care what you're 'telling me', I'm going by what WP says we can and should do ... I can't for the life of me find anything that says
2206:
https://web.archive.org/web/20101212055644/http://blog.zap2it.com/frominsidethebox/2010/10/sister-wives-finale-will-season-2-see-robyn-move-into-the-house.html
2032:
As mentioned in the article, the "husband" is legally wed to only one woman. In the name of accuracy, then, would not the use of "married ," instead of simply
760:
354:
1971:(1) Suggested: Convert to a religion that accepts polygamy. (2) Optional: Move to a place such as Utah and hang out with polygamists. (3) Propose to someone.
783:
2226:
https://web.archive.org/web/20101021224639/http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/sister_wives/?story=%2Fent%2Ftv%2F2010%2F10%2F16%2Fsister_wives_interview
1830:
1776:
be merged into this article. Since their notability derives from the show, this article can easily include the information contained in the other one. -
350:
2239:
2209:
2260:
http://tvbythenumbers.com/2010/10/05/sunday-cable-ratings-boardwalk-empire-mostly-stable-rubicon-still-tiny-mad-men-kardashians-dexter-lots-more/66791
199:, they seem to be made up of people with a great deal of scholarly and journalistic experience and education. The author of this particular article,
200:
2229:
2185:
2080:
http://tvbythenumbers.com/2010/09/28/sunday-cable-ratings-boardwalk-empire-falls-rubicon-stays-low-the-glades-mad-men-kardashians-lots-more/65626
1720:
2216:
https://web.archive.org/web/20130706182306/http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2013/07/02/sister-wives-returns-for-a-fourth-season-on-tlc/190033/
1975:(By the way, apparently there is at least one family of "quasi-Buddhist" polygamists in Utah; see a HuffPo article about reality TV family of
2391:
1913:
1826:
346:
1906:
Two children of Janelle and Kody show birth date just 3 months apart. Madison has a Nov 1995 birthday and Hunter has a Feb 1996 birthday.
518:
was part of a rash of recent interest in the very specific concept of plural marriage, which is really more misleading about the content of
2441:
1956:
1732:
Hahahahaha. Hahahahahah. Use of the term 'Mormon' without LDS permission is in no way copyright infringement. Hahahahaha you crack me up.
1371:
It wouldn't matter to me if she was a Catholic, a Hindu, an Atheist, a Jain, a Buddhist or a Baptist or a Jew, the other two ladies were
2270:
http://tvbythenumbers.com/2010/10/12/sunday-cable-ratings-boardwalk-empire-plunges-rubicon-up-mad-men-kardashians-mlb-playoffs-more/67765
1102:
2219:
2011:
1994:
1891:
1784:
1733:
902:
It is unclear whether the lawyers claimed this before the series was broadcast or that the family was already at risk of prosecution.
765:
981:. The article strikes a good balance between description of the content, the broadcast dates, and both legal and critical reaction.
2295:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
2286:
https://web.archive.org/web/20101021064846/http://tvbythenumbers.com/2010/10/19/tlcs-sister-wives-scores-big-finale-and-season/68808
2200:
http://tvbythenumbers.com/2010/08/06/love-is-all-in-the-family-on-tlcs-new-series-sisters-wives-premiering-sunday-september-26/59324
2085:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
1042:
924:
876:
722:
670:
618:
564:
467:
412:
304:
292:
Why should it not be in past tense? We are talking about when it first broadcast, which would be September 26, which is the past. —
227:
144:
2246:
https://web.archive.org/web/20101001040122/http://livefeed.hollywoodreporter.com/2010/09/tlcs-sister-wives-premieres-strong.html
1755:
1529:
a Fundamentalist family but the newspaper article, which again was, and still is being plagiarized in the entry, says that she
1127:
788:
1810:. In some cases, however, a person famous for only one event may be more widely known than the event itself, for example, the
2425:
1822:
2289:
2007:
1990:
1887:
1848:
1142:
991:. However, the article, in tone and opinion, seems to be in line with most reviews and mainstream coverage of the series.
594:
2360:
2249:
2150:
1047:
929:
881:
727:
675:
623:
569:
472:
417:
309:
232:
149:
2240:
http://www.okmagazine.com/2010/10/nancy-grace-on-sister-wives-investigation-%E2%80%9Ckody-should-go-to-jail%E2%80%9D/
1979:
646:
I think your idea is a good one and feel that it will make this a better article in the long run. Nice work. Cheers.
510:
are about the complexities in a large familial unit that includes multiple wives. From a thematic standpoint, then,
2210:
http://blog.zap2it.com/frominsidethebox/2010/10/sister-wives-finale-will-season-2-see-robyn-move-into-the-house.html
1878:- I've gone ahead and split off the portion of the article w concern the now extremely notable litigation, per both
822:
The lead image of the title card is fair use. The other one is not working, it may have been deleted from commons.
484:
38:
2316:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
2106:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
1751:
1716:
1141:
The article ends with "A hearing was set for January 2013." That hearing was reported by the Salt Lake Tribune:
1123:
2387:
2230:
http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/sister_wives/?story=%2Fent%2Ftv%2F2010%2F10%2F16%2Fsister_wives_interview
1917:
1030:
browser? (I'll try to get on another computer to take a look at it soon, to make sure it's not on my end...) —
2445:
2186:
https://web.archive.org/web/20101009172424/http://communities.canada.com/vancouversun/print.aspx?postid=697951
1960:
1724:
1679:
2351:
2177:
2141:
2067:
1865:
1844:
1737:
1106:
998:
1712:
1301:
be included somewhere in the article. You decide where, okay, or leave it be if I choose the spot. Cheers.
1024:
Thanks for taking on the review! Yes, the second image was recently deleted, so I've removed the photo box.
2383:
1807:
1787:
1780:
1455:
807:
531:
1454:
please see below. One Canadian news article refers to her as "Mormon", by which they may very well mean
2335:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
2323:
2125:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
2113:
1987:
interesting scholarly article that references the practice of polygamy among some Buddhists in Indonesia
1857:
1773:
1037:
919:
871:
811:
717:
665:
613:
559:
462:
407:
299:
222:
139:
2176:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
2066:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
1687:
Knowledge:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard#Sister_Wives_and_claims_about_religious_affiliation
1077:
1014:
959:
831:
514:
doesn't really seem to be a contextual fit. Including it with the others actually makes it seem as if
2189:
1814:. In such cases, the article about the event may be most appropriately named for the person involved."
1667:
2413:
2379:
1952:
1909:
1708:
1149:
1098:
207:
to write on this subject, much more so than most of the authors of the news articles. It seems to me
1199:) know but the fact that she self-identifies as a 'mormon' is very pertinent to this topic. Cheers.
2417:
2220:
http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2013/07/02/sister-wives-returns-for-a-fourth-season-on-tlc/190033/
2037:
1932:
1694:
1675:
1634:
1542:
1467:
1409:
1347:
1280:
1228:
1182:
699:
643:) unless someone ends up in jail ... on second thought that might make new episodes more desirable.
492:
437:
385:
332:
257:
212:
180:
165:
114:
83:
1073:
1010:
955:
827:
2421:
2041:
1861:
1840:
912:
the show debuted. I reworded it a bit to try to make it more clear, let me know if that works. —
544:
comes at a time that polygamy is a prevalent topic in American pop culture" to "The broadcast of
2320:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
2110:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
844:
there appears to be overlap in the description of the series between the 1st and 3rd sections.
2336:
2126:
1219:
If you what you say is correct about how serious this is to her religious community then its a
1777:
527:
47:
17:
975:- no vandalism or edit wars are apparent. Intelligent discussion of issues on the talk page.
1984:
1032:
1004:
Overrall this article is very impressive and clear. A big congratulations to all involved.
914:
866:
712:
660:
658:
Now that the second season renewal has been announced, I've gone ahead with this. Thanks! —
608:
554:
457:
402:
294:
282:
217:
134:
2343:
2133:
1860:
into this article, since the notability of the former is totally dependent on the latter.
1818:
1791:
1145:
342:
2290:
http://tvbythenumbers.com/2010/10/19/tlcs-sister-wives-scores-big-finale-and-season/68808
2003:
100:, which she said is "untrue and screens out a whole world of social history and nuance".
2302:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
2092:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
1879:
1690:
1671:
1630:
1538:
1463:
1405:
1343:
1276:
1224:
1178:
695:
488:
433:
381:
328:
253:
110:
2342:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
2132:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
2250:
http://livefeed.hollywoodreporter.com/2010/09/tlcs-sister-wives-premieres-strong.html
1658:
1534:
1400:
1220:
97:
2169:
2059:
1803:
1131:
988:
395:
I still feel that it's worth including. What if we changed the reference regarding
2449:
2429:
2395:
2365:
2155:
2045:
2006:
is an article in the LATimes about another non-Mormon polygamist family in Utah.--
1964:
1921:
1869:
1795:
1759:
1741:
1698:
1638:
1594:
1546:
1496:
1471:
1440:
1413:
1393:
1351:
1308:
1284:
1250:
1232:
1206:
1186:
1171:
1153:
1110:
1081:
1053:
1018:
963:
935:
887:
835:
733:
703:
681:
653:
629:
575:
535:
496:
478:
441:
423:
389:
336:
315:
286:
261:
238:
190:
155:
118:
2309:
2099:
1883:
1589:
1491:
1435:
1388:
1303:
1245:
1201:
1166:
648:
278:
185:
106:
raised nothing about fundamentalist polygamy that wasn't already publicly known.
93:
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
2308:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
2098:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
1817:
Another example I can think of where a person is known but for one event is
694:
At one point the article mentions 16 children, and at another, 13 children.
814:. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
196:
908:
Although it also came later, here I meant to convey that it was expressed
1811:
1243:; it's not as if anyone is accusing her of being something else. Cheers.
455:
was canceled after only a few episodes, if we feel that's a good idea? —
372:
1747:
1521:
a Mormon. There are discrepancies. You say on the show she said she
2440:
Do they not believe in vaccinations? No mention of this at any time
376:
252:
and not news itself, which, once again, isn't an issue in this case.
104:
One claim here does not appear in her review as far as I can see --
2190:
http://communities.canada.com/vancouversun/print.aspx?postid=697951
1942:
Want General Information...Please take a moment to read and answer.
446:
For now, then, I've restored it with the new wording added. I know
1685:
I have started a discussion at the BLP/N. It can be found here -
1072:
The problem was on my browser, I've deleted that comment now. --
540:
That's precisely why I changed the wording of "The broadcast of
1386:' a source; either it can be used or it can't. Period. Cheers.
204:
1517:
And I'm telling you that it is not sufficient to say that she
1297:
of BLP ? This lady self-identifies as a Mormon ... that info
635:
I agree that there most likely will be new episodes in a new '
25:
1670:. How much more plagiarism is there in this entry I wonder.
322:
Sister wives is being broadcast during a time when polygamy
168:
outfit is pretty much a blog, where anybody can contribute.
1666:
segment from was also, word for word, plagiarized from the
1423:
183:
qualifies as a reputable source here at Knowledge. Cheers.
2180:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
2070:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
1585:
Do you fully understand what a single purpose account is
1382:
I've got to say that I'm not wild about your method of '
895:
2. From the "Legal Issues" section, the first sentence:
2173:
2063:
1625:
603:
368:
1144:. Sorry I don't have time to update the article... --
74:
There is a very odd summary of the review written for
327:
things are no longer current. I concur with Mrcolj.
2312:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
2102:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
2036:better represent his other, "spiritual," unions?
1579:Your personal insults and condescending behavior (
1458:(or something broader that includes them) and not
1289:You've lost me here; you raise the BLP issue and
1117:"Patriarch" and "are considered spiritual unions'
1223:concern and should not be bandied about lightly.
641:new seasons are now started throughout the year
2298:This message was posted before February 2018.
2088:This message was posted before February 2018.
87:writer Joanna Brooks was strongly critical of
8:
1588:
1490:
1434:
1387:
1302:
1244:
1200:
1165:
647:
604:please see this edit I made to illustrate it
184:
127:making fun of reviewers who are reacting to
1525:"raised a Mormon", and Kody says that they
2411:
2377:
2168:I have just modified 11 external links on
2058:I have just modified one external link on
1927:
1746:I suggest you look at the Wiki article on
1375:in a polygamous environment ... this lady
743:
197:Looking over the staff in their about page
851:(Here I intend to post a list of snags.)
1656:
1293:say that the info shouldn't be kept out
211:is a legit RS, which is probably why it
1930:
774:
746:
44:Do not edit the contents of this page.
7:
1626:edit summaries from my own talk page
1882:and esp. pertinent wiki practice @
1821:. Note that her name redirects to
24:
2172:. Please take a moment to review
2062:. Please take a moment to review
164:Hmm ... I just noticed that this
78:in the entry. Here's the text -
29:
1827:Hodgson-Burnett's Secret Garden
1750:- it includes other groups. --
347:Hodgson-Burnett's Secret Garden
195:I would respectfully disagree.
179:I'd be very, very surprised if
1823:Resignation of Shirley Sherrod
1680:18:44, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
1441:22:55, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
1414:22:36, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
1404:issue in the subsection below.
1394:21:54, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
1352:18:37, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
1309:17:21, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
1285:03:27, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
1251:22:16, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
1239:IMHO, that's quite a stretch.
1233:21:27, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
1207:21:19, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
1187:21:10, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
1172:19:59, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
548:comes at a time that polygamy
337:22:01, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
316:21:40, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
287:23:35, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
1:
2450:07:45, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
2016:18:10, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
1999:18:05, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
1965:08:27, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
1896:18:23, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
734:05:54, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
704:20:28, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
1902:Verify birthday of children?
1725:00:09, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
1583:) will be scrutinized also.
1111:22:44, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
1082:23:30, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
1054:22:59, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
1019:22:47, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
964:16:46, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
936:00:23, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
888:00:23, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
836:16:46, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
826:Second image box deleted. --
682:05:54, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
654:02:15, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
630:01:41, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
483:I would think the fact that
1922:17:35, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
1699:02:32, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
1639:12:00, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
1595:02:31, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
1547:02:16, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
1497:02:10, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
1472:00:00, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
1137:Hearing of January 17, 2013
995:Future issues/Current event
602:of what I'm talking about,
588:So, I was thinking that if
576:18:56, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
536:17:02, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
497:05:33, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
479:04:20, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
442:22:00, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
424:21:56, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
390:14:56, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
355:19:54, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
262:11:54, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
239:11:51, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
191:08:17, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
156:11:42, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
119:02:06, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
2465:
2329:(last update: 5 June 2024)
2165:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
2119:(last update: 5 June 2024)
2055:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
1835:23:22, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
1742:00:48, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
1154:07:34, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
485:Under the Banner of Heaven
213:has its own Knowledge page
70:Religion Dispatches review
2430:22:37, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
2407:wrong and how to fix it.
2396:16:39, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
2366:00:39, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
1796:19:38, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
1788:Random Picture of the Day
2156:11:20, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
2046:00:40, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
1870:05:53, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
1760:01:27, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
1422:Do you even know what a
1132:01:35, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
2161:External links modified
2051:External links modified
2008:Hodgdon's secret garden
1991:Hodgdon's secret garden
1888:Hodgdon's secret garden
1849:07:38, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
1241:She claims to be mormon
174:Online discussion board
1816:
1808:Steve Bartman incident
1456:Mormon fundamentalists
1430:it doesn't hold water.
550:and multiple marriages
522:show than it is about
250:commentary on the news
1858:Kody Brown and family
1801:
1774:Kody Brown and family
1752:Richardson mcphillips
1668:Vancouver Sun article
1124:Richardson mcphillips
954:It works fine now. --
812:Talk:Sister Wives/GA1
42:of past discussions.
2310:regular verification
2100:regular verification
1983:-- hmmm -- and also
1657:Source doesn't meet
1624:issue, nor to quote
2300:After February 2018
2090:After February 2018
1159:Janelle as a Mormon
363:Bigamy and Polygamy
209:Religion Dispatches
205:extremely qualified
181:Religion Dispatches
166:Religion Dispatches
84:Religion Dispatches
76:Religion Dispatches
2354:InternetArchiveBot
2305:InternetArchiveBot
2144:InternetArchiveBot
2095:InternetArchiveBot
690:How many children?
584:Episodes list page
2432:
2416:comment added by
2398:
2382:comment added by
2330:
2120:
2024:
2023:
1988:
1955:comment added by
1912:comment added by
1728:
1711:comment added by
1101:comment added by
802:
801:
67:
66:
54:
53:
48:current talk page
18:Talk:Sister Wives
2456:
2364:
2355:
2328:
2327:
2306:
2154:
2145:
2118:
2117:
2096:
1982:
1967:
1928:
1924:
1727:
1713:Roxanne Peterson
1705:
1593:
1495:
1439:
1392:
1307:
1249:
1205:
1170:
1113:
1050:
1045:
1040:
1035:
999:WP:Summary style
932:
927:
922:
917:
884:
879:
874:
869:
756:Copyvio detector
744:
730:
725:
720:
715:
678:
673:
668:
663:
652:
626:
621:
616:
611:
572:
567:
562:
557:
475:
470:
465:
460:
420:
415:
410:
405:
312:
307:
302:
297:
235:
230:
225:
220:
189:
152:
147:
142:
137:
63:
56:
55:
33:
32:
26:
2464:
2463:
2459:
2458:
2457:
2455:
2454:
2453:
2438:
2404:
2399:
2384:GOINGOUTTOLUNCH
2373:
2358:
2353:
2321:
2314:have permission
2304:
2178:this simple FaQ
2163:
2148:
2143:
2111:
2104:have permission
2094:
2068:this simple FaQ
2053:
2030:
2025:
1950:
1935:
1914:209.129.241.120
1907:
1904:
1819:Shirley Sherrod
1772:I propose that
1770:
1706:
1663:
1161:
1139:
1119:
1096:
1093:
1048:
1043:
1038:
1033:
930:
925:
920:
915:
882:
877:
872:
867:
806:This review is
798:
770:
742:
728:
723:
718:
713:
692:
676:
671:
666:
661:
624:
619:
614:
609:
586:
570:
565:
560:
555:
473:
468:
463:
458:
418:
413:
408:
403:
365:
310:
305:
300:
295:
274:
233:
228:
223:
218:
176:? More like it.
150:
145:
140:
135:
72:
59:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
2462:
2460:
2442:66.172.228.167
2437:
2434:
2410:````rach0581
2403:
2400:
2374:
2372:
2369:
2348:
2347:
2340:
2293:
2292:
2284:Added archive
2282:
2274:Added archive
2272:
2264:Added archive
2262:
2254:Added archive
2252:
2244:Added archive
2242:
2234:Added archive
2232:
2224:Added archive
2222:
2214:Added archive
2212:
2204:Added archive
2202:
2194:Added archive
2192:
2184:Added archive
2162:
2159:
2138:
2137:
2130:
2083:
2082:
2074:Added archive
2052:
2049:
2029:
2026:
2022:
2021:
2020:
2019:
2001:
1957:97.123.105.104
1944:
1943:
1937:
1936:
1931:
1926:
1903:
1900:
1899:
1898:
1854:
1853:
1852:
1851:
1769:
1768:Merge proposal
1766:
1765:
1764:
1763:
1762:
1702:
1701:
1662:
1655:
1654:
1653:
1652:
1651:
1650:
1649:
1648:
1647:
1646:
1645:
1644:
1643:
1642:
1641:
1608:
1607:
1606:
1605:
1604:
1603:
1602:
1601:
1600:
1599:
1598:
1597:
1577:
1558:
1557:
1556:
1555:
1554:
1553:
1552:
1551:
1550:
1549:
1506:
1505:
1504:
1503:
1502:
1501:
1500:
1499:
1479:
1478:
1477:
1476:
1475:
1474:
1446:
1445:
1444:
1443:
1417:
1416:
1369:
1368:
1367:
1366:
1365:
1364:
1363:
1362:
1361:
1360:
1359:
1358:
1357:
1356:
1355:
1354:
1324:
1323:
1322:
1321:
1320:
1319:
1318:
1317:
1316:
1315:
1314:
1313:
1312:
1311:
1262:
1261:
1260:
1259:
1258:
1257:
1256:
1255:
1254:
1253:
1212:
1211:
1210:
1209:
1197:and won't ever
1160:
1157:
1138:
1135:
1118:
1116:
1115:
1092:
1089:
1088:
1087:
1086:
1085:
1058:
1057:
970:
969:
968:
967:
939:
938:
891:
890:
839:
838:
817:
816:
800:
799:
797:
796:
791:
786:
780:
777:
776:
772:
771:
769:
768:
766:External links
763:
758:
752:
749:
748:
741:
738:
737:
736:
691:
688:
687:
686:
685:
684:
644:
585:
582:
581:
580:
579:
578:
506:
505:
504:
503:
502:
501:
500:
499:
427:
426:
364:
361:
360:
359:
358:
357:
319:
318:
273:
270:
269:
268:
267:
266:
265:
264:
242:
241:
203:, is likewise
177:
172:? Not really.
161:
160:
159:
158:
102:
101:
71:
68:
65:
64:
52:
51:
34:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2461:
2452:
2451:
2447:
2443:
2435:
2433:
2431:
2427:
2423:
2419:
2415:
2408:
2401:
2397:
2393:
2389:
2385:
2381:
2370:
2368:
2367:
2362:
2357:
2356:
2345:
2341:
2338:
2334:
2333:
2332:
2325:
2319:
2315:
2311:
2307:
2301:
2296:
2291:
2287:
2283:
2281:
2277:
2273:
2271:
2267:
2263:
2261:
2257:
2253:
2251:
2247:
2243:
2241:
2237:
2233:
2231:
2227:
2223:
2221:
2217:
2213:
2211:
2207:
2203:
2201:
2197:
2193:
2191:
2187:
2183:
2182:
2181:
2179:
2175:
2171:
2166:
2160:
2158:
2157:
2152:
2147:
2146:
2135:
2131:
2128:
2124:
2123:
2122:
2115:
2109:
2105:
2101:
2097:
2091:
2086:
2081:
2077:
2073:
2072:
2071:
2069:
2065:
2061:
2056:
2050:
2048:
2047:
2043:
2039:
2035:
2027:
2018:
2017:
2013:
2009:
2005:
2000:
1996:
1992:
1986:
1981:
1978:
1977:My Five Wives
1973:
1970:
1969:
1968:
1966:
1962:
1958:
1954:
1947:
1941:
1940:
1939:
1938:
1934:
1929:
1925:
1923:
1919:
1915:
1911:
1901:
1897:
1893:
1889:
1885:
1881:
1877:
1874:
1873:
1872:
1871:
1867:
1863:
1862:Beyond My Ken
1859:
1850:
1846:
1842:
1841:Mistakefinder
1838:
1837:
1836:
1832:
1828:
1824:
1820:
1815:
1813:
1809:
1805:
1800:
1799:
1798:
1797:
1793:
1789:
1786:
1782:
1779:
1775:
1767:
1761:
1757:
1753:
1749:
1745:
1744:
1743:
1739:
1735:
1731:
1730:
1729:
1726:
1722:
1718:
1714:
1710:
1700:
1696:
1692:
1688:
1684:
1683:
1682:
1681:
1677:
1673:
1669:
1660:
1640:
1636:
1632:
1627:
1622:
1621:
1620:
1619:
1618:
1617:
1616:
1615:
1614:
1613:
1612:
1611:
1610:
1609:
1596:
1591:
1586:
1582:
1578:
1576:verification.
1574:
1570:
1569:
1568:
1567:
1566:
1565:
1564:
1563:
1562:
1561:
1560:
1559:
1548:
1544:
1540:
1536:
1532:
1528:
1524:
1520:
1516:
1515:
1514:
1513:
1512:
1511:
1510:
1509:
1508:
1507:
1498:
1493:
1487:
1486:
1485:
1484:
1483:
1482:
1481:
1480:
1473:
1469:
1465:
1461:
1457:
1452:
1451:
1450:
1449:
1448:
1447:
1442:
1437:
1432:
1431:
1425:
1421:
1420:
1419:
1418:
1415:
1411:
1407:
1402:
1398:
1397:
1396:
1395:
1390:
1385:
1384:picking apart
1380:
1378:
1374:
1353:
1349:
1345:
1340:
1339:
1338:
1337:
1336:
1335:
1334:
1333:
1332:
1331:
1330:
1329:
1328:
1327:
1326:
1325:
1310:
1305:
1300:
1296:
1292:
1288:
1287:
1286:
1282:
1278:
1274:
1273:
1272:
1271:
1270:
1269:
1268:
1267:
1266:
1265:
1264:
1263:
1252:
1247:
1242:
1238:
1237:
1236:
1235:
1234:
1230:
1226:
1222:
1218:
1217:
1216:
1215:
1214:
1213:
1208:
1203:
1198:
1194:
1190:
1189:
1188:
1184:
1180:
1176:
1175:
1174:
1173:
1168:
1158:
1156:
1155:
1151:
1147:
1143:
1136:
1134:
1133:
1129:
1125:
1114:
1112:
1108:
1104:
1103:174.97.255.26
1100:
1090:
1084:
1083:
1079:
1075:
1070:
1069:
1067:
1066:
1064:
1063:
1061:
1060:
1056:
1055:
1052:
1051:
1046:
1041:
1036:
1029:
1023:
1022:
1021:
1020:
1016:
1012:
1009:
1005:
1002:
1000:
996:
992:
990:
986:
982:
980:
976:
974:
966:
965:
961:
957:
952:
951:
949:
948:
946:
945:
943:
942:
940:
937:
934:
933:
928:
923:
918:
911:
907:
906:
904:
903:
900:
899:
892:
889:
886:
885:
880:
875:
870:
862:
861:
859:
858:
853:
852:
850:
845:
843:
837:
833:
829:
825:
824:
823:
821:
815:
813:
809:
804:
803:
795:
792:
790:
787:
785:
782:
781:
779:
778:
773:
767:
764:
762:
759:
757:
754:
753:
751:
750:
745:
739:
735:
732:
731:
726:
721:
716:
708:
707:
706:
705:
701:
697:
689:
683:
680:
679:
674:
669:
664:
657:
656:
655:
650:
645:
642:
638:
634:
633:
632:
631:
628:
627:
622:
617:
612:
605:
600:
598:
591:
583:
577:
574:
573:
568:
563:
558:
551:
547:
543:
539:
538:
537:
533:
529:
525:
521:
517:
513:
508:
507:
498:
494:
490:
486:
482:
481:
480:
477:
476:
471:
466:
461:
454:
449:
445:
444:
443:
439:
435:
431:
430:
429:
428:
425:
422:
421:
416:
411:
406:
398:
394:
393:
392:
391:
387:
383:
378:
374:
370:
362:
356:
352:
348:
344:
340:
339:
338:
334:
330:
325:
321:
320:
317:
314:
313:
308:
303:
298:
291:
290:
289:
288:
284:
280:
271:
263:
259:
255:
251:
246:
245:
244:
243:
240:
237:
236:
231:
226:
221:
214:
210:
206:
202:
201:Joanna Brooks
198:
194:
193:
192:
187:
182:
178:
175:
171:
167:
163:
162:
157:
154:
153:
148:
143:
138:
130:
125:
124:
123:
122:
121:
120:
116:
112:
107:
99:
98:Protestantism
95:
90:
86:
85:
81:
80:
79:
77:
69:
62:
58:
57:
49:
45:
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
2439:
2412:— Preceding
2409:
2405:
2378:— Preceding
2352:
2349:
2324:source check
2303:
2297:
2294:
2170:Sister Wives
2167:
2164:
2142:
2139:
2114:source check
2093:
2087:
2084:
2060:Sister Wives
2057:
2054:
2033:
2031:
2028:Scare quotes
1976:
1974:
1972:
1951:— Preceding
1948:
1945:
1933:WP:NOTAFORUM
1908:— Preceding
1905:
1875:
1856:I've merged
1855:
1802:
1778:Presidentman
1771:
1734:78.86.29.107
1707:— Preceding
1703:
1664:
1661:requirements
1584:
1580:
1572:
1530:
1526:
1522:
1518:
1429:
1428:
1399:Please read
1383:
1381:
1376:
1372:
1370:
1298:
1294:
1290:
1240:
1196:
1192:
1162:
1140:
1120:
1097:— Preceding
1094:
1091:Season Count
1071:
1068:
1065:
1062:
1059:
1031:
1027:
1025:
1007:
1006:
1003:
994:
993:
984:
983:
978:
977:
972:
971:
953:
950:
947:
944:
941:
913:
909:
905:
901:
896:
894:
893:
865:
860:
855:
854:
848:
847:
846:
841:
840:
819:
818:
805:
794:Instructions
711:
693:
659:
640:
636:
607:
597:Sister Wives
596:
590:Sister Wives
589:
587:
553:
549:
546:Sister Wives
545:
542:Sister Wives
541:
528:Grandpallama
524:Sister Wives
523:
519:
515:
511:
456:
452:
447:
401:
396:
366:
323:
293:
275:
249:
216:
208:
173:
169:
133:
129:Sister Wives
128:
105:
103:
89:Sister Wives
88:
82:
75:
73:
60:
43:
37:
849:Minor fixes
808:transcluded
272:Past Tense?
94:Catholicism
36:This is an
2361:Report bug
2151:Report bug
1949:Jennifer
1689:. Cheers.
1587:? Cheers.
1146:Blanchette
761:Authorship
747:GA toolbox
367:Regarding
2371:christine
2344:this tool
2337:this tool
2134:this tool
2127:this tool
1839:Support!
1691:Griswaldo
1672:Griswaldo
1631:Griswaldo
1539:Griswaldo
1464:Griswaldo
1406:Griswaldo
1344:Griswaldo
1277:Griswaldo
1225:Griswaldo
1179:Griswaldo
1008:Reviewer:
973:Stability
842:Structure
784:Templates
775:Reviewing
740:GA Review
696:Lemurbaby
516:Lone Star
512:Lone Star
489:Griswaldo
453:Lone Star
448:Lone Star
434:Griswaldo
397:Lone Star
382:Griswaldo
329:Griswaldo
254:Griswaldo
248:contains
215:too... —
111:Griswaldo
61:Archive 1
2426:contribs
2418:Rach0581
2414:unsigned
2392:contribs
2380:unsigned
2350:Cheers.—
2140:Cheers.—
2038:Orthotox
2034:married,
1953:unsigned
1910:unsigned
1886:, etc.--
1812:Tank Man
1792:Talkback
1785:contribs
1721:contribs
1709:unsigned
1433:Cheers.
1099:unsigned
789:Criteria
599:episodes
595:List of
373:polygamy
343:wp:TENSE
170:Magazine
2436:Vaccine
2174:my edit
2064:my edit
1880:wp:BOLD
1748:Mormons
1537:issues.
1295:because
1074:Ktlynch
1011:Ktlynch
956:Ktlynch
828:Ktlynch
39:archive
1659:WP:BLP
1590:Duke53
1535:WP:BLP
1492:Duke53
1436:Duke53
1401:WP:BLP
1389:Duke53
1373:raised
1304:Duke53
1246:Duke53
1221:WP:BLP
1202:Duke53
1167:Duke53
910:before
898:series
820:Images
649:Duke53
637:season
377:bigamy
371:edit,
279:Mrcolj
186:Duke53
2402:help!
1804:WP:1E
1573:parts
1377:chose
989:WP:RS
979:Scope
810:from
16:<
2446:talk
2422:talk
2388:talk
2042:talk
2012:talk
2004:here
2002:And
1995:talk
1989:).--
1985:this
1980:here
1961:talk
1918:talk
1892:talk
1884:wp:N
1866:talk
1845:talk
1831:talk
1781:talk
1756:talk
1738:talk
1717:talk
1695:talk
1676:talk
1635:talk
1543:talk
1468:talk
1424:Jain
1410:talk
1348:talk
1299:will
1291:then
1281:talk
1229:talk
1183:talk
1150:talk
1128:talk
1107:talk
1078:talk
1028:your
1015:talk
985:NPOV
960:talk
832:talk
700:talk
532:talk
520:that
493:talk
438:talk
386:talk
375:and
369:this
351:talk
341:See
333:talk
283:talk
258:talk
115:talk
96:and
2318:RfC
2288:to
2278:to
2268:to
2258:to
2248:to
2238:to
2228:to
2218:to
2208:to
2198:to
2188:to
2108:RfC
2078:to
1876:Cmt
1527:are
1523:was
1460:LDS
1193:Why
1039:ter
1034:Hun
921:ter
916:Hun
873:ter
868:Hun
719:ter
714:Hun
667:ter
662:Hun
639:' (
615:ter
610:Hun
561:ter
556:Hun
464:ter
459:Hun
409:ter
404:Hun
345:?--
301:ter
296:Hun
224:ter
219:Hun
141:ter
136:Hun
2448:)
2428:)
2424:•
2394:)
2390:•
2331:.
2326:}}
2322:{{
2121:.
2116:}}
2112:{{
2044:)
2014:)
1997:)
1963:)
1920:)
1894:)
1868:)
1847:)
1833:)
1794:)
1758:)
1740:)
1723:)
1719:•
1697:)
1678:)
1637:)
1592:|
1545:)
1531:is
1519:is
1494:|
1470:)
1438:|
1412:)
1391:|
1350:)
1306:|
1283:)
1248:|
1231:)
1204:|
1185:)
1169:|
1152:)
1130:)
1109:)
1080:)
1049:hn
1044:Ka
1017:)
962:)
931:hn
926:Ka
883:hn
878:Ka
834:)
729:hn
724:Ka
702:)
677:hn
672:Ka
651:|
625:hn
620:Ka
571:hn
566:Ka
534:)
495:)
474:hn
469:Ka
440:)
419:hn
414:Ka
388:)
353:)
335:)
324:is
311:hn
306:Ka
285:)
260:)
234:hn
229:Ka
188:|
151:hn
146:Ka
117:)
2444:(
2420:(
2386:(
2363:)
2359:(
2346:.
2339:.
2153:)
2149:(
2136:.
2129:.
2040:(
2010:(
1993:(
1959:(
1916:(
1890:(
1864:(
1843:(
1829:(
1790:(
1783:·
1754:(
1736:(
1715:(
1693:(
1674:(
1633:(
1541:(
1466:(
1408:(
1346:(
1279:(
1227:(
1191:"
1181:(
1148:(
1126:(
1105:(
1076:(
1013:(
958:(
830:(
698:(
530:(
526:.
491:(
436:(
384:(
349:(
331:(
281:(
256:(
113:(
50:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.