42:
325:, and allow this article to turn into an overview of both series, with links to episode lists for seasons one and two which describe their content in greater detail. Secondly, if there is a swing in opinion for or against the programme be sure to separate it by episode.
180:
1. The first section needs to be re-titled. "Conception" is too close to "development". I think "Concept" is what was intended, but some other term, analogous to "plot synopsis" in the article of a fictional work would be preferred.
187:
For now I've changed it to "Concept", although I'm open to other names. I'm not a big fan of "Plot synopsis" because that to me sounds like a scripted show, not a reality show, but if you feel strongly about it I could go with it. —
221:
As polygamy is illegal in the United States, attorneys and legal experts have claimed even before the show debuted that the Browns could potentially have opened themselves up to criminal prosecution through their involvement in the
311:, to my reading the article is not blatantly biased, and this is a sensitive topic to write about. An issue here is avoidance using smaller, partisan website and sources, and strict adherence to
350:
As far as your other comment, are you saying that all the letter "L"'s have been replaced by explanation points? Because I'm not seeing that here. Are you sure it isn't
321:. In two months' time the second series will be broadcast so the scope and content of this article is likely to change significantly. Editors should be sure to follow
80:
47:
70:
126:
226:
It is unclear whether the lawyers claimed this before the series was broadcast or that the family was already at risk of prosecution.
122:
52:
305:. The article strikes a good balance between description of the content, the broadcast dates, and both legal and critical reaction.
366:
248:
200:
107:
75:
315:. However, the article, in tone and opinion, seems to be in line with most reviews and mainstream coverage of the series.
99:
371:
253:
205:
146:
The lead image of the title card is fair use. The other one is not working, it may have been deleted from commons.
354:
browser? (I'll try to get on another computer to take a look at it soon, to make sure it's not on my end...) —
322:
348:
Thanks for taking on the review! Yes, the second image was recently deleted, so I've removed the photo box.
361:
243:
195:
401:
338:
283:
155:
397:
334:
279:
151:
236:
the show debuted. I reworded it a bit to try to make it more clear, let me know if that works. —
168:
there appears to be overlap in the description of the series between the 1st and 3rd sections.
115:
17:
299:- no vandalism or edit wars are apparent. Intelligent discussion of issues on the talk page.
356:
328:
Overrall this article is very impressive and clear. A big congratulations to all involved.
238:
190:
312:
92:
405:
377:
342:
287:
259:
232:
Although it also came later, here I meant to convey that it was expressed
211:
159:
396:
The problem was on my browser, I've deleted that comment now. --
219:
2. From the "Legal Issues" section, the first sentence:
134:
103:
8:
30:
175:(Here I intend to post a list of snags.)
61:
33:
7:
24:
1:
406:23:30, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
378:22:59, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
343:22:47, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
288:16:46, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
260:00:23, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
212:00:23, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
160:16:46, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
150:Second image box deleted. --
319:Future issues/Current event
425:
278:It works fine now. --
89:
88:
18:Talk:Sister Wives
416:
374:
369:
364:
359:
323:WP:Summary style
256:
251:
246:
241:
208:
203:
198:
193:
139:
130:
111:
43:Copyvio detector
31:
424:
423:
419:
418:
417:
415:
414:
413:
372:
367:
362:
357:
254:
249:
244:
239:
206:
201:
196:
191:
120:
97:
91:
85:
57:
29:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
422:
420:
412:
411:
410:
409:
382:
381:
294:
293:
292:
291:
263:
262:
215:
214:
163:
162:
140:
87:
86:
84:
83:
78:
73:
67:
64:
63:
59:
58:
56:
55:
53:External links
50:
45:
39:
36:
35:
28:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
421:
408:
407:
403:
399:
394:
393:
391:
390:
388:
387:
385:
384:
380:
379:
376:
375:
370:
365:
360:
353:
347:
346:
345:
344:
340:
336:
333:
329:
326:
324:
320:
316:
314:
310:
306:
304:
300:
298:
290:
289:
285:
281:
276:
275:
273:
272:
270:
269:
267:
266:
264:
261:
258:
257:
252:
247:
242:
235:
231:
230:
228:
227:
224:
223:
216:
213:
210:
209:
204:
199:
194:
186:
185:
183:
182:
177:
176:
174:
169:
167:
161:
157:
153:
149:
148:
147:
145:
141:
138:
137:
133:
128:
124:
119:
118:
114:
109:
105:
101:
96:
95:
82:
79:
77:
74:
72:
69:
68:
66:
65:
60:
54:
51:
49:
46:
44:
41:
40:
38:
37:
32:
26:
19:
395:
392:
389:
386:
383:
355:
351:
349:
331:
330:
327:
318:
317:
308:
307:
302:
301:
296:
295:
277:
274:
271:
268:
265:
237:
233:
229:
225:
220:
218:
217:
189:
184:
179:
178:
172:
171:
170:
165:
164:
143:
142:
135:
131:
117:Article talk
116:
112:
93:
90:
81:Instructions
173:Minor fixes
104:visual edit
48:Authorship
34:GA toolbox
332:Reviewer:
297:Stability
166:Structure
71:Templates
62:Reviewing
27:GA Review
76:Criteria
398:Ktlynch
335:Ktlynch
280:Ktlynch
152:Ktlynch
127:history
108:history
94:Article
234:before
222:series
144:Images
313:WP:RS
303:Scope
136:Watch
16:<
402:talk
352:your
339:talk
309:NPOV
284:talk
156:talk
123:edit
100:edit
363:ter
358:Hun
245:ter
240:Hun
197:ter
192:Hun
404:)
373:hn
368:Ka
341:)
286:)
255:hn
250:Ka
207:hn
202:Ka
158:)
125:|
106:|
102:|
400:(
337:(
282:(
154:(
132:·
129:)
121:(
113:·
110:)
98:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.