538:
ride on rails, it's not an aerial tramway. Or a gondola lift. With no disrespect to
Waddell, dead even longer than Steinman, he's giving a justification for why one uses a transporter bridge to effect a crossing at grade, rather than a definition of one. I have to wonder, why exactly does this matter? This oddball construction is certainly closer to a transporter bridge than to anything else, and there are many sources that cite it as "one of only two transporter bridges ever built in the US". ++
245:
224:
255:
407:. The Sky Ride violates the most basic concept of a transporter bridge, the desire to transport passengers, vehicles, and cargo at the grade of the surrounding terrain without building a bridge deck at grade, in order to leave the bridged waterway unobstructed. This is accomplished by a rigid elevated superstructure carrying a rolling truck which in turn supports a gondola which is, by cables or less often by a rigid structure,
140:
335:
119:
71:
150:
523:(though there's considerable sloppy use of both terms and the term "cable car") by the gondolas on an AT rolling along a fixed cable by being pulled by a second cable versus the gondolas on a GL riding on a single moving cable. I assert no claim that that distinction is correct, but only that it is the position already taken in Knowledge (XXG). The gondolas on the Sky Ride rolled along a fixed cable.
88:
1242:, was completed, over the ship canal from Lake Avenue, Duluth, to Minnesota Point" (emphasis added) thus implying that the Knoxville cableway was not a transporter bridge .) On page 11 the author also describes and includes a sketch for a proposed design for a "modified type of transporter bridge" which is clearly an aerial tramway (and one on which, I would hope, they would distribute
1365:, that ferried people across the lagoon in the center of the fair. It was demolished after carrying X,XXX,XXX riders during the run of the fair. The Sky Ride had an 1,850-foot (564 m) span and two XXX-feet tall towers, making it the most prominent structure at the fair. Suspended from the span, 215 feet (66 m) above the ground, were rocket-shaped cars, each carrying 36 passengers.
21:
1274:. A clue might be found in Tyrrell's comment that the car on the Knoxville cableway moved at a steep incline. It may be that the engineers and architects of the day only considered near-horizontal aerial tramways, such as that at Devil's Dyke, as transporter bridges, but considered those which scaled heights to be a structure type unto themselves. (As can be seen from the
943:
708:
article proposed a new use for this type of construction doesn't convert it from a aerial tramway to a transporter bridge. You can load up a passenger car with household goods to move them from one home to another, but that doesn't make the car a moving van. The 1933 article never calls the Sky Ride
1269:
It is thus clear that contemporary sources clearly considered at least some aerial tramways to be transporter bridges. What's not clear at this remove is whether they considered all, or just some, aerial tramways to be transporter bridges. It's not that aerial tramways were new or novel at this time
537:
Accounts of the bridge differ. Some illustrations show girders of a truss, while others show only cable stays but the "rocket cars" by many/most accounts, ride on rails, not cables. Steinman, the designer of the bridge, of course would know what was built, but he's been dead a long time. If the cars
330:
The following material was stashed in the body of the article, commented out. As the original author of this article, I put it there thinking I'd like to try to make use of it later. Since that doesn't seem to be common practice, (someone just deleted it and I had to fish it out of the history) I'm
603:
interpretation :). Thanks for digging that ref up! ... the PM ref below though speaks of rails. So I don't know. Letting others weigh in seems prudent. Another possibility is to add it to the aerial tram category but leave it in the transporter bridge category, and discuss in the article how it has
869:
Also, I consider the
Engineering News-Record article and the book co-authored by the engineer who designed it, both published and scholarly, to be much more reliable sources than this page. So While we should change the article to describe both in the lead section, I don't think this is such a big
593:
Those pics are amazing, I had not found them at the time I was doing my original research. They should be referenced from the article. I wonder where they came from. I agree with you that they clearly show that the "truss" is really just an arrangement of cables (which is what most sources say)...
1237:
and is clearly an aerial tramway. (It must be also noted, however, that
Tyrrell later, at page 9, after describing the Portugalete, Bizerta, Rouen, Nantes, and Marselle classic-style transporter bridges, says, "up to this time, transporter bridges had not been used in America ... but in 1905,
1384:
I thought I tried to say that I'm Ok with the text added by me, the thing DOES have aspects of aerial trams, but I like your wording even better. No one needs to feel badly about this episode, the article is better now than it was before due to us all digging around and adding bits we found.
786:
There are sources that describe it as both, so the article should describe it as both. However, I would have to think that if the
Popular Science article had come true and larger versions were built that carried vehicles, our German source would not be calling this a cable car. -
1369:
Text about the number of transporter bridges in the US can then be moved to the history section. I think this is more engaging than the current lead. It also explains why the article is in both the amusement ride category as well as the transporter bridge category. Thoughts? -
459:, which I consider pretty reliable (although I'm not sure how reliable others consider it) . In thinking about this more, it seems your argument is based on conveyance grade level as the defining feature of transporter bridge. I'm not sure I agree with that one feature being
411:. In the Sky Ride, the gondolas are (a) at the level of the superstructure, not at grade, (b) are attached directly to, not suspended from, the rolling trucks, and (c) passengers ascend to the superstructure level by elevators. One of the sources cited by the article,
367:
I have a family heirloom, a U.S.Patent granted to
William Lindsay Hamilton, his heirs relating to "Ropeways and the like". I understand that William Hamilton designed the Transporter Bridge. The Patent number is 1501333 and was granted in Washington on 15th July, 1924
434:
I have to dig up the research I did way back when but I think there are sources that characterize it as a transporter bridge. I can't argue with your criteria based analysis, if you posit the assumptions, it's correct, but I do wonder where you got the criteria from?
559:, especially in the second and third images. As to the reason that it matters, it's simply a matter of someone's mistake being perpetuated. In the grand scheme of things, however, I'm not sure that this or anything about transporter bridges matters other than as a
488:, "The only excuse for the existence of this type of structure is that its construction is permissible at certain locations where no low-level bridge would be allowed, and where a high-level structure would be unsatisfactory for the crossing traffic."
915:
Let me try to dig those up. IF they even exist. It's been a long time since I worked on this and it's possible that I just synthesized it (it's allowable to do counting synthesis IF your facts are in order :) ) rather than found it somewhere.
867:." Near the bottom, the text near the bottom does not translate clearly. Sentences are incomplete where it asserts (but does not clearly state) that it is not a transporter bridge. Do you know of a better translation site than google?
891:
Lar, if you have some additional "sources that cite it as 'one of only two transporter bridges ever built in the US'" we could cite them here as well. (That's not a challenge, BTW, just a suggestion.) I'm going to go ahead
638:
If the cables were enlarged, the elevators replaced by larger lifts, ... and the rocket cars were designed to accomodate vehicles, the entire system would become an aerial ferry ... capable of carrying loaded trucks and
500:
which notes that the gondola is hung at the level of the river banks. The credibility of
Structurae is in doubt when it identifies the "Structural Type" as a "Cable-stayed bridge deck truss" when there's no deck truss
1255:
in his section on transporter bridges has a list of "other bridges of this type" and includes in that list, a reference to a "Cableway at
Brighton, England," obviously being the Devil's Dyke cableway described
1030:
1222:, England, the car on the former one moving on a cable with steep incline." He goes on to say that the English one is the one at Devil's Dyke designed by W.J. Brewer. Photos of that cableway can be seen
598:
in the article where it looks thicker is no doubt a retouch job. They also seem to show the cars travel on cables (although exactly how isn't quite clear) rather than suspended rails, at least that's my
1289:
reverting Lar's inclusion of the language I previously requested because it is misleading. I apologize to Lar and ¢Spender1983 for the trouble I've put them to (and also for this talk page edit being
493:
733:
On account of the steepness of the banks, the great rise and fall of the tides, the length of the span, and the height of headway needed, any ordinary kind of bridge was impracticable, and therefore
497:
489:
1090:
Successful construction and operation of the
Skyride transporter bridge at the Century of Progress was a tribute to model testing work, which formed a conspicuous part of the design procedure.
415:, clearly says, albeit in German, that the Sky Ride is not a transporter bridge, but is instead a "cable car." Some close-up photos of the Sky Ride gondolas and cable system are available at
1219:
about transporter bridges, says without further comment, "During the year 1894, two important passenger cableways were erected, one near
Knoxville, Tennessee, and the other at Brighton Dyke
1085:
1249:
710:
1259:
1459:
196:
1084:- Here is a reference for transporter bridge. It's only a snippet view in Google books, but it's enough to show that a reliable secondary source called it a transporter bridge.
1454:
687:
Not a bad approach... the article could use modernization, conversion to inline cites and the like and this could be done at the same time, if someone were so inclined. ++
1201:
a transporter bridge. I have now found two or three authoritative references, written during the heyday of transporter bridges, which clearly indicate that some, or all,
389:
I propose that the reference to "transporter bridge" in the first paragraph of the article be changed to "aerial tramway" and that the second paragraph be deleted.
1281:
Whatever the explanation, it is indisputably clear that the architects and engineers of the time considered some aerial tramways to be transporter bridges. I and
206:
1449:
313:
636:(May 1933). This article and the associated illustration clearly discuss that the Sky Ride is intended as a model for future bridges. Quoting page 669: "
63:
1469:
303:
1278:
description, the fact that the
Knoxville cableway not only scaled a height but also served to cross a river probably added to its ambiguity.)
678:
172:
1474:
1464:
1321:
It has been an interesting discussion, at the very least, and therefore enjoyable to me. I have been thinking that the lead should change to:
463:
defining feature, and Sky Ride seems to hit the rest well enough. I'm also not clear I'd call it an aerial tram. Perhaps the thing to do is
1033:, but they're non-free images and I don't know how, if it's possible at all, to link to the search result page without violating #9 of
1290:
813:
Add a new paragraph immediately following the second paragraph and just above the Contents box which would read (without italics):
163:
124:
269:
229:
1191:
I have found the smoking gun and it has shot me. I am reverting the edit made by Lar to insert the language which I requested.
99:
357:
1223:
1265:
has a sketch of an aerial tramway and says that it "represents in a crude form the principle of the transporter bridge."
846:
This made sense to me so I've incorporated it into the article where you suggested. I converted the cites slightly. ++
1424:
1375:
1146:
1097:
875:
792:
721:
674:
646:
485:
1411:
1394:
1067:
925:
855:
778:
696:
613:
547:
476:
444:
279:
1309:
1174:
1123:
1046:
1017:
972:
901:
756:
584:
528:
506:
424:
105:
87:
1209:
656:
Comment - Perhaps the article can be corrected to be more along the lines of the Popular Science azrticle. "
666:
658:
The Sky ride functioned as an amusement ride for the world's fair, but was presented as a model for future
1138:
1231:
1193:
As it turns out, I was right that the Sky Ride was a aerial tramway, but I was wrong, too, in that it is
1420:
1419:
Done. Moved the extra text from the lead (along with some other text) to a new section called Design. -
1371:
1142:
1093:
871:
788:
766:
670:
642:
560:
464:
375:
171:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
36:
1038:
354:(was Meigs field for a while ... now being redeveloped after Mayor Daley had Meigs Field bulldozed)
1334:
1294:
1159:
1108:
1042:
1002:
957:
897:
752:
580:
524:
502:
420:
56:
59:
carried 4.5 million fairgoers in "rocket cars" 60 m above ground, before being demolished in 1934?
1354:
830:
821:
659:
595:
400:
825:
576:
453:
416:
396:
20:
1243:
556:
1362:
572:
1286:
1034:
992:
893:
740:
244:
223:
155:
1285:
are, therefore, clearly wrong about the Sky Ride not being a transporter bridge and I am
600:
1358:
1330:
1230:, and clearly show it to be an aerial tramway. The Knoxville one is fully described in
1202:
979:
516:
404:
358:
http://maps.google.com/maps?ll=41.861954,-87.605066&spn=0.024078,0.040851&hl=en
260:
392:
1443:
1407:
1390:
1338:
1063:
921:
851:
774:
692:
609:
543:
472:
467:, point out what different sources call it and leave it to the reader to conclude? ++
440:
1227:
568:
520:
338:
Artistically enhanced photograph of the Century of Progress world's fair, with the
334:
633:
1350:
1029:
Re the external link, there's also a very good collection of detailed images at
139:
118:
1271:
870:
controversy that it needs to be in the lead; place it lower in the article. -
838:
456:
412:
391:
While the Sky Ride has been identified as a transporter bridge in a number of
250:
145:
1158:
Thanks, guys, for the article cleanup and inclusions. I think this is done.
1037:, whereas linking to the individual image pages would seem to violate #3 of
834:
31:
942:
632:
This should remain listed as a transporter bridge. Please see page 666 in
1403:
1386:
1346:
1059:
917:
847:
770:
688:
605:
539:
490:
Economics of bridgework: a sequel to Bridge engineering (at Google Books)
468:
436:
168:
48:
1342:
275:
53:
1402:
So did you make that change or no? I think that's a great new lead. ++
863:
When google translates the page for me, it says (near the top left) "
739:" (Emphasis added.) Perhaps the best compromise and compliance with
333:
564:
40:
column on 3 January 2006. The text of the entry was as follows:
1428:
1414:
1397:
1379:
1315:
1180:
1150:
1129:
1101:
1070:
1050:
1023:
928:
905:
879:
858:
796:
781:
760:
699:
650:
616:
588:
550:
532:
510:
479:
447:
428:
378:
996:
adding a link to the pictures when Lar had already added one.
743:
would be to merely recognize the conflict of opinions, citing
81:
15:
69:
492:
and additional discussion at that source and at Waddell's
720:
knew the difference: the 1922 article, in describing the
413:
niederelbe.de (more properly, Die Welt der Schwebefähren)
274:, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to
1137:- Here is where Steinman calls it a transporter bridge.
1253:, Volume 1, by John Alexander Low Waddell, 1916, p. 671
1205:
were considered to be transporter bridges. They are:
331:
bringing it here so it does not get lost/forgotten:
167:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
1240:
the first and only one on this side of the Atlantic
1235:, 1894, Vol. 68, p. 283 (and illustrated on p. 282)
735:this special kind, called a 'transporter bridge,'
384:RfC: Removal of transporter bridge classification
563:historical curiosity of interest only to bridge
1261:The Theory and Practice of Bridge Construction
896:and add an external link to the picture page.
567:and lovers of Big Steel Things such as steel
555:That it's not a truss can be clearly seen at
64:Knowledge (XXG):Recent additions/2006/January
8:
1460:Low-importance WikiProject Illinois articles
395:sources, such as (and perhaps most notably)
1361:), designed by the bridge engineering firm
829:, some contend that the Sky Ride was not a
85:
1058:I think it's allowable to link to them. ++
218:
113:
1455:Start-Class WikiProject Illinois articles
1215:. The author of this monograph, which is
1031:SAIC (Search Result on "Sky Ride Image")
374:Archie Hamilton Glasgow, Scotland, U.K
220:
115:
70:
1276:American Engineer and Railroad Journal
1263:by Morgan William Davies, 1908, p. 433
1233:American Engineer and Railroad Journal
940:
839:Die Welt der Schwebefähren (in German)
575:(like me). In any event, I'm ready to
1450:Knowledge (XXG) Did you know articles
62:A record of the entry may be seen at
7:
1213:by Henry Grattan Tyrrell, 1912, p. 5
709:a "transporter bridge," and a prior
266:This article is within the scope of
181:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Illinois
161:This article is within the scope of
1086:Engineering News-Record Feb 8, 1934
498:The Builder, Vol. 68, June 18, 1904
342:bridge spanning the exposition area
288:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Chicago
104:It is of interest to the following
820:Though frequently identified as a
409:suspended back down to grade level
14:
941:
253:
243:
222:
148:
138:
117:
86:
19:
1470:Low-importance Chicago articles
496:, and also to the same effect,
308:This article has been rated as
201:This article has been rated as
1246:at the beginning of the ride).
714:Vol. 37 No. 1 Pg. 60 Jan. 1922
634:Popular Mechanics Vol 59 No. 5
30:appeared on Knowledge (XXG)'s
1:
1429:20:32, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
1415:22:45, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
1398:22:08, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
1380:20:06, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
1316:16:47, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
1181:14:05, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
1151:12:02, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
1130:05:11, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
1102:04:36, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
1071:01:23, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
1051:17:33, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
1024:21:12, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
929:01:23, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
906:16:51, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
880:16:27, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
859:15:36, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
797:19:06, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
782:16:47, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
761:16:31, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
700:15:20, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
651:04:08, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
617:13:32, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
589:21:03, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
551:19:56, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
533:19:39, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
511:19:28, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
480:18:34, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
448:17:32, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
429:15:59, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
187:WikiProject Illinois articles
184:Template:WikiProject Illinois
175:and see a list of open tasks.
1475:WikiProject Chicago articles
1465:Start-Class Chicago articles
291:Template:WikiProject Chicago
1491:
1349:(located near what became
1283:Die Welt der Schwebefähren
1139:The Long Crossing page 100
749:Die Welt der Schwebefähren
722:Newport Transporter Bridge
716:shows that the editors of
486:John Alexander Low Waddell
379:20:23, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
314:project's importance scale
207:project's importance scale
1107:Good find, PennySpender.
947:
681:) 08:54, 11 November 2009
579:and let others weigh in.
307:
280:Chicago metropolitan area
238:
200:
133:
112:
1363:Robinson & Steinman
1368:
399:, it is clearly not a
350:a link to the location
343:
94:This article is rated
75:
1322:
767:Teach the controversy
519:an AT differs from a
465:teach the controversy
337:
98:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
73:
1353:) in 1933. It was a
747:on the one hand and
164:WikiProject Illinois
1335:Century of Progress
1211:Transporter Bridges
1186:Another time around
977:) admits an act of
660:transporter bridges
604:aspects of both. ++
417:www.worldfairs.info
270:WikiProject Chicago
57:Century of Progress
1355:transporter bridge
1272:(see this history)
1251:Bridge Engineering
1197:an aerial tramway
1081:Transporter bridge
831:transporter bridge
822:transporter bridge
731:" and says that, "
704:The fact that the
557:worldfairs.free.fr
494:Bridge Engineering
403:but is instead an
401:transporter bridge
344:
100:content assessment
76:
990:In specific, for
987:
986:
718:Popular Mechanics
712:Popular Mechanics
706:Popular Mechanics
683:
669:comment added by
573:steam locomotives
328:
327:
324:
323:
320:
319:
217:
216:
213:
212:
80:
79:
1482:
1312:
1305:
1304:
1300:
1177:
1170:
1169:
1165:
1126:
1119:
1118:
1114:
1020:
1013:
1012:
1008:
975:
968:
967:
963:
945:
938:
937:
865:also a cable car
682:
671:PennySpender1983
663:
296:
295:
294:Chicago articles
292:
289:
286:
263:
258:
257:
256:
247:
240:
239:
234:
226:
219:
189:
188:
185:
182:
179:
158:
153:
152:
151:
142:
135:
134:
129:
121:
114:
97:
91:
90:
82:
72:
23:
16:
1490:
1489:
1485:
1484:
1483:
1481:
1480:
1479:
1440:
1439:
1337:Exposition (or
1310:
1302:
1298:
1296:
1203:aerial tramways
1188:
1175:
1167:
1163:
1161:
1124:
1116:
1112:
1110:
1018:
1010:
1006:
1004:
973:
965:
961:
959:
811:Proposed Draft:
664:
386:
365:
352:
293:
290:
287:
284:
283:
259:
254:
252:
232:
186:
183:
180:
177:
176:
156:Illinois portal
154:
149:
147:
127:
95:
74:Knowledge (XXG)
12:
11:
5:
1488:
1486:
1478:
1477:
1472:
1467:
1462:
1457:
1452:
1442:
1441:
1438:
1437:
1436:
1435:
1434:
1433:
1432:
1431:
1359:aerial tramway
1333:built for the
1267:
1266:
1257:
1247:
1187:
1184:
1156:
1155:
1154:
1153:
1076:
1075:
1074:
1073:
1043:TransporterMan
1027:
1026:
985:
984:
954:
953:
948:
946:
936:
935:
934:
933:
932:
931:
898:TransporterMan
889:
888:
887:
886:
885:
884:
883:
882:
868:
833:but an aerial
808:
807:
806:
805:
804:
803:
802:
801:
800:
799:
753:TransporterMan
751:on the other.
724:, calls it a "
630:
629:
628:
627:
626:
625:
624:
623:
622:
621:
620:
619:
581:TransporterMan
577:drop the stick
525:TransporterMan
517:aerial tramway
513:
503:TransporterMan
421:TransporterMan
405:aerial tramway
385:
382:
364:
363:Patent details
361:
351:
348:
326:
325:
322:
321:
318:
317:
310:Low-importance
306:
300:
299:
297:
265:
264:
261:Chicago portal
248:
236:
235:
233:Low‑importance
227:
215:
214:
211:
210:
203:Low-importance
199:
193:
192:
190:
173:the discussion
160:
159:
143:
131:
130:
128:Low‑importance
122:
110:
109:
103:
92:
78:
77:
67:
61:
60:
24:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1487:
1476:
1473:
1471:
1468:
1466:
1463:
1461:
1458:
1456:
1453:
1451:
1448:
1447:
1445:
1430:
1426:
1422:
1418:
1417:
1416:
1413:
1409:
1405:
1401:
1400:
1399:
1396:
1392:
1388:
1383:
1382:
1381:
1377:
1373:
1367:
1366:
1364:
1360:
1356:
1352:
1348:
1344:
1340:
1336:
1332:
1328:
1320:
1319:
1318:
1317:
1313:
1307:
1306:
1292:
1288:
1284:
1279:
1277:
1273:
1264:
1262:
1258:
1254:
1252:
1248:
1245:
1241:
1236:
1234:
1229:
1225:
1221:
1218:
1214:
1212:
1208:
1207:
1206:
1204:
1200:
1196:
1192:
1185:
1183:
1182:
1178:
1172:
1171:
1152:
1148:
1144:
1140:
1136:
1133:
1132:
1131:
1127:
1121:
1120:
1106:
1105:
1104:
1103:
1099:
1095:
1091:
1087:
1083:
1082:
1072:
1069:
1065:
1061:
1057:
1056:
1055:
1054:
1053:
1052:
1048:
1044:
1040:
1036:
1032:
1025:
1021:
1015:
1014:
1001:
1000:
995:
994:
989:
988:
982:
981:
976:
970:
969:
956:
955:
952:
949:
944:
939:
930:
927:
923:
919:
914:
913:
912:
911:
910:
909:
908:
907:
903:
899:
895:
881:
877:
873:
866:
862:
861:
860:
857:
853:
849:
845:
844:
843:
841:</ref: -->
840:
836:
832:
828:</ref: -->
827:
823:
818:
817:
816:
815:
814:
812:
798:
794:
790:
785:
784:
783:
780:
776:
772:
768:
764:
763:
762:
758:
754:
750:
746:
742:
738:
736:
730:
728:
723:
719:
715:
713:
707:
703:
702:
701:
698:
694:
690:
686:
685:
684:
680:
676:
672:
668:
661:
655:
654:
653:
652:
648:
644:
640:
635:
618:
615:
611:
607:
602:
597:
592:
591:
590:
586:
582:
578:
574:
570:
569:truss bridges
566:
562:
558:
554:
553:
552:
549:
545:
541:
536:
535:
534:
530:
526:
522:
518:
514:
512:
508:
504:
499:
495:
491:
487:
483:
482:
481:
478:
474:
470:
466:
462:
458:
454:
451:
450:
449:
446:
442:
438:
433:
432:
431:
430:
426:
422:
418:
414:
410:
406:
402:
398:
394:
390:
383:
381:
380:
377:
376:81.102.38.183
372:
369:
362:
360:
359:
355:
349:
347:
341:
336:
332:
315:
311:
305:
302:
301:
298:
281:
277:
273:
272:
271:
262:
251:
249:
246:
242:
241:
237:
231:
228:
225:
221:
208:
204:
198:
195:
194:
191:
174:
170:
166:
165:
157:
146:
144:
141:
137:
136:
132:
126:
123:
120:
116:
111:
107:
101:
93:
89:
84:
83:
68:
65:
58:
55:
51:
50:
46:... that the
45:
42:
41:
39:
38:
33:
29:
25:
22:
18:
17:
1421:¢Spender1983
1372:¢Spender1983
1339:World's Fair
1326:
1324:
1323:
1295:
1282:
1280:
1275:
1268:
1260:
1250:
1239:
1232:
1220:
1216:
1210:
1198:
1194:
1190:
1189:
1160:
1157:
1143:¢Spender1983
1134:
1109:
1094:¢Spender1983
1089:
1080:
1078:
1077:
1028:
1003:
998:
997:
991:
978:
958:
951:I'm a Nitwit
950:
890:
872:¢Spender1983
864:
837:<ref: -->
824:<ref: -->
819:
810:
809:
789:¢Spender1983
765:Absolutely.
748:
744:
737:was created.
734:
732:
726:
725:
717:
711:
705:
657:
643:¢Spender1983
639:automobiles.
637:
631:
521:gondola lift
460:
455:, it's from
408:
388:
387:
373:
370:
366:
356:
353:
345:
339:
329:
309:
268:
267:
202:
162:
106:WikiProjects
52:at the 1933
47:
44:Did you know
43:
37:Did you know
35:
27:
26:A fact from
1351:Meigs Field
1291:non-concise
1244:brown pants
1039:WP:ELPOINTS
665:—Preceding
561:Goldbergian
96:Start-class
1444:Categories
1331:attraction
1299:RANSPORTER
1164:RANSPORTER
1113:RANSPORTER
1088:. Quote: "
1007:RANSPORTER
980:WikiIdiocy
962:RANSPORTER
826:Structurae
745:Structurae
484:How about
457:Structurae
452:Found it:
397:Structurae
393:verifiable
835:cable car
727:suspended
32:Main Page
1347:Illinois
1327:Sky Ride
1079:Ref for
679:contribs
667:unsigned
501:present.
340:Sky Ride
178:Illinois
169:Illinois
125:Illinois
49:Sky Ride
28:Sky Ride
1343:Chicago
1329:was an
1135:Another
1035:WP:ELNO
741:WP:NPOV
371:Signed
312:on the
285:Chicago
278:or the
276:Chicago
230:Chicago
205:on the
54:Chicago
34:in the
1287:boldly
1256:above.
993:boldly
894:boldly
102:scale.
1341:) in
999:D'oh!
729:ferry
601:WP:OR
596:image
565:geeks
1425:talk
1376:talk
1357:(or
1325:The
1311:TALK
1228:here
1226:and
1224:here
1217:only
1195:both
1176:TALK
1147:talk
1141:. -
1125:TALK
1098:talk
1092:" -
1047:talk
1019:TALK
974:TALK
902:talk
876:talk
793:talk
769:. ++
757:talk
675:talk
647:talk
641:" -
594:the
585:talk
571:and
529:talk
515:Per
507:talk
425:talk
1404:Lar
1387:Lar
1293:).
1199:and
1060:Lar
918:Lar
848:Lar
771:Lar
689:Lar
606:Lar
540:Lar
469:Lar
461:the
437:Lar
304:Low
197:Low
1446::
1427:)
1406::
1389::
1385:++
1378:)
1345:,
1314:)
1303:AN
1179:)
1168:AN
1149:)
1128:)
1117:AN
1100:)
1062::
1049:)
1041:.
1022:)
1011:AN
983:.
966:AN
920::
916:++
904:)
878:)
850::
795:)
773::
759:)
691::
677:•
662:.
649:)
608::
587:)
542::
531:)
509:)
471::
439::
435:++
427:)
346:.
1423:(
1412:c
1410:/
1408:t
1395:c
1393:/
1391:t
1374:(
1308:(
1301:M
1297:T
1173:(
1166:M
1162:T
1145:(
1122:(
1115:M
1111:T
1096:(
1068:c
1066:/
1064:t
1045:(
1016:(
1009:M
1005:T
971:(
964:M
960:T
926:c
924:/
922:t
900:(
874:(
856:c
854:/
852:t
842:.
791:(
779:c
777:/
775:t
755:(
697:c
695:/
693:t
673:(
645:(
614:c
612:/
610:t
583:(
548:c
546:/
544:t
527:(
505:(
477:c
475:/
473:t
445:c
443:/
441:t
423:(
419:.
316:.
282:.
209:.
108::
66:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
