1428:'s points on the talk page, I do agree that a lot of space is devoted to Hinks, without it being clear what he has to do with this particular breed. I do think Hinks warrants a mention in the article, though, since the sources about this breed do seem to cover him. I don't think he warrants an entire subheader at least, and the text about him could be cut down (and cut parts moved to articles about the relevant breeds). On a similar note, "of Birmingham, England" is irrelevant to the intro, as it has nothing to do with the subject of this article (more relevant details about this breed are not mentioned, while that is).
950:
42:
1435:
some time, difficult to get recognition for the breed and it was not until the 1930's that the KC recognised the breed", and the second says "Although offshoots of the
Staffordshire Bull Terrier were given recognition by the English Kennel Club as early as the late 1800’s, it was 1935 before this breed received the same honor, primarily due to it’s fighting history.".
715:
1237:
994:) to develop a new standard and purpose. AST's are heavier and taller than the English Staffies (AST males are 18 to 19 inches at the shoulder vs SBT at 14 to 16 inches). It probably had something to do with gaining advantage in pit fighting back in the day. The appearances of the Staffie vs American Staffie would probably be along the same lines as a
889:
610:
599:
585:
574:
534:
523:
512:
483:
472:
460:
448:
437:
423:
412:
401:
387:
373:
314:
288:
255:
226:
212:
201:
188:
1085:
Hmm, this seems like pretty significant info. To me, and probably many other unfamiliar readers, it actually creates far more confusion that the issue of two different breeds with the same name is not addressed. The first thing that comes to mind is "what's the connection", and looking throughout the
624:
Hey, there FM!! Yes, it has been a while. I was quite pleased to see that you took the review. Quick answer to your dog—-bitch question. It's standard terminology used by breeders and at dog shows. After the dog & bitch classes have been judged, the winners of each division go back in for
Winners
1104:
article for appearances. In looking at the WP article, American
Staffordshire Terrier, (which needs updating/fact checking), the commonality is the Bulldog x Terrier ancestry. Trying to connect the two is a bit complicated because timelines vary, much of the information is based on anecdotal reports
970:
On the physical differences; what sets this one apart from, say, an
American Pit Bull Terrier or an American Staffordshire Terrier? And I'm still unsure why the American Staffordshire has the similar name? As for the talk page discussion, I'll let it play out and read through it so that I can better
885:
Ok, I've clarified the James Hinks connection. Pretty sure I fixed all the izes to ises. Re-ordered the sections for fluidity, expanded/clarified where I could without getting too FA-like vs GA-like. As for acronyms vs spelling out, I created sub-sections for KC & AKC in the
Recognition section,
989:
Breeders develop new breeds via outcrosses and line breeding, etc. to improve upon or breed out certain inheritable traits/genetic qualities. The
American Staffordshire Terrier is the result of breeders in the US wanting a bigger, heavier dog than the Staffie, so they outcrossed Staffies to larger,
1434:
Cavalryman's issue that the line "The
Staffie's early origins as a fighting dog made it difficult to gain recognition as a breed for entry in the KC's breed registry" is unsupported by the refs seems to be unfounded, as the first ref says "Because of its early association with fighting it was, for
938:
Not quite sure what you're reaching for? Nickname issue...I realise your goal is consistency but consider the following: my useage of the nickname vs the formal full name is somewhat equivalent to using uppercase
President vs lower case president. I used Staffordshire Bull Terrier when the formal
644:
I removed the citations that weren't needed in the lead, but 2 still remain because they are likely to be challenged. Fn#1 is cited to the same source that is used in the body text, but Fn#3 is from a single source cited only to the lead. It's contains a quote about breed specific legislation that
679:
Apologies for being sidetracked, FunkMonk. The article was stable when I made the GAC nom, and I've never had anything like this crop up during a GA review. I responded to what I believed to be valid suggestions from the other 3 editors, and hope they will allow you to continue the review as an
184:
I see some citations are used in the intro that art not used in the article body; the intro should not have unique info, and therefore no unique citations, as it is only supposed to summarise the article body. Therefore, the intro doesn't need citations for non-controversial info either.
1060:"Whatever the AmStaff’s true genetic composition might be, we are certain that working-class Brits with an interest in blood sports combined the stocky build and punishing jaws of old-style Bulldogs with the innate courage and “gameness” of terriers to create bull-type terrier breeds."
1438:
Ratting should be mentioned in the article body with source, not just the intro. Otherwise the intro seems to reflect the article body, but could perhaps also include a bit on its temperament and health, since the intro is supposed to summarise all important aspects of the
1198:. In fact, the closest I came to anything other than bear & bull baiting was a recent article about an isolated incident of illegal badger hunting. I've put in a request for 2 sources that support rat-baiting with Staffordshire Bull Terriers, so I guess now we wait.
1484:
Thanks. I'd like to settle all grievances in an orderly fashion on the talk page, point by point, before I close the nomination, so it doesn't disintegrate into an edit war afterwards. Hopefully everyone will be satisfied. This shouldn't be harder to solve than the
1064:"Authorities differ on whether the American Staffordshire Terrier and the pit bull are the same breed. The AKC and the Continental Kennel Club separate them, whereas the United Kennel Club combines both within the American Pit Bull Terrier breed."
1266:
Hi, SN - so happy to see you here!! You are among my favorite editors when it comes to collaboration, yet we've had too few engagements in that regard. Thank you for pointing to the books, and bringing the term to my attention. Rat-baiting was
1320:
Thanks very much, you're very kind. I'm sorry if I was jumping into to controversy with my suggestion: I see on the talk page that you've been mildly trolled over it for a while now. Apologies, but I stopped reading that TLDR sometime ago...!
1066:
Staffordshire Bull
Terriers were originally developed in England and have maintained their purebred status there and in the US. The ancestral connection (especially in dog years) is too far back and mention of it would only cause confusion.
1194:, the last standing challenge on the article TP is about the omission of rat-baiting from the history. I may not be holding my mouth right when I type in the words for a Google or Bing search but I've been unable to find any RS that state
520:"not to be confused with the American Staffordshire Terrier which is a distinctly separate breed." Not really stated outside the intro, and could use some elaboration,. What is the relation between the two, and why the same name?
1449:'s remaining points are, but they are welcome to list them here for evaluation. But intros do not need citations for uncontroversial info, as they are only supposed to summarise the article body, where the citations are located.
1086:
article to find the answer. If there is a controversy of whether the two are the same or not, that should definitely be mentioned (just like possible synonymies between animal taxa are always discussed in their articles).
651:
Yes, they are short so I combined 2 of them, which tightens things up a little. Regarding both temperament and health, we're limited to a generalization of what's expected in that breed. Anything beyond that speaks to
919:
Looking good, you just added one more ize ending in a section header though, " Unrecognized breed"! I wonder if there is anything on physical differences from other breeds? Will get back to the nickname issue later.
870:
Any reason why you switch from the full name to the nickname - fixed; use full name when specific to breed registry, club names, and referencing titles, and
Staffie when generically describing the dog.
947:, there may have been a little slippage which is an early sign of being kennel blind; i.e., my splay-footed, bug-eyed, wire haired dog with the overbite is tomorrow's Westminster Best In Show.
1177:
I am satisfied with the responses to the points I've made, but since there is currently a lot of editing and discussion going on, I'll wait until it settles, so we can reach a stable version.
47:
409:"Common nicknames Stafford & Staffie" I wonder if a comma would be better than "&" for clarity. Especially since one other breed mentioned even has the word "and" in its name.
582:"James Hinks of Birmingham, England was founder of the Bull Terrier." Why is this info about a different breed relevant in the intro here? Also, he is not linked outside the intro.
1024:
Ah, I see. I think it warrants a mention then that the American breed is (partially?) descended from the British one, now it reads like they have nothing in common but the name.
596:"a breed that "emerged as one of the most successful and enduring." According to who? Also the quote could maybe be paraphrased or repeated in the article body, or moved there.
126:
625:
Dog and Winners Bitch. Oxford defines "dog" as "The male of an animal of the dog family, or of some other mammals such as the otter." I'll get to work on the other issues.
480:
I think it would be better if the history section was chronological; the Early protection covers a time before that covered in Recognition, so should logically come first.
445:
Any reason why you switch from the full name to the nickname halfway down the article? You even switch between adjacent sentences. Would probably be best to be consistent.
326:
1006:
but more subtle. Breed standards would also provide some of the differences. Example, AKC allows both cropped or uncropped ears on AST whereas Staffies must be uncropped.
80:
223:
without context are generally discouraged, so I'd suggest removing it, and if any of the images are important, move them to where they would make sense in the article.
122:
850:
I rather mean physically; it would appear to me that much of the description would also apply to many similar dogs? So what makes it physically distinct from them?
773:
Unless I add a further comment below a point, I'm satisfied with the points you've ticked and answered (striking out is rather uncommon, I see it as superfluous).
680:
uninvolved reviewer making a determination. I invite you to look at their suggestions, and make your own determination as if they were participants in the review.
70:
107:
52:
1101:
1381:
Great, I'll have a look at the latest round of comments on the talk page soon, then I'll see if I can suggest how to progress, if anything is even needed.
99:
648:
The images are properly licensed. They are old images (84 yrs) so they're in the public domain. It's highly probable that the photog has long since died.
1329:
1247:
1239:
for various sources.Great article though . Our Stella would be proud of you. Well, she'd doubtless prefer sausages, but that's the way of things :)
166:
Far too long since I reviewed one of your articles! I'll have a look soon, and though I find them very interesting, I'm not exactly a dog expert, so
571:"In 2018 PETA lobbied the British Parliament to have the Staffordshire Bull Terrier added to the list" Why? I thought they were for animal rights?
971:
understand what's going on. Strange how the article is suddenly attracting so many editors... Haven't seen anything like it since I peer reviewed
592:
check it now...I've clarified the Hinks connection whereas before, it was a dubious disconnect. I should have been more attentive - apologies.
1279:, then replaced with bull-baiting which appeared to be more prominent. Perhaps it should have said "vermin destruction" per the following
698:
Seems like that discussion has gone off the rails, I'll leave the issue for last, after I've tried to get an overview of the situation.
75:
170:
is free to chime in here if he has anything to add (I saw he already commented on the talk page). Some preliminary comments first.
553:
Personally, I also spell out terms at first mention outside the intro, but I'm not sure what the guidelines say, so no big deal.
808:
I've commented on the talk page, the editor there does not seem to be familiar with GA/FAC. In any case, it is not a big deal.
115:
17:
1047:
531:"In the US, the ASPCA" What is that? Anything to link? Could also be spelled out, like you do with most other organisations.
156:
1220:
1054:
with the exception that the APBT is UKC registered and not recognized by AKC, and the AST is recognized by AKC but not UKC.
1336:
1254:
1431:
The line "first arrived in North America in the mid to late 1800s" does not match the mid 1880s date stated in the intro.
835:
Re:Gallery - added context via gallery title, and hidden captions naming colors, & showing cropped vs uncropped ears
209:"the dogs weigh 29 to 37 pounds (13 to 17 kg) and the bitches" Is it common terminology to only call the males "dogs"?
765:
In your list of issues above, would you be so kind as to strike the ones that were completed to your satisfaction?
396:
92:
1051:
1399:
1322:
1240:
252:
I added context via gallery title, and hidden captions naming colors, & showing cropped vs uncropped ears
1412:
1372:
1305:
1208:
1154:
1119:
1077:
1016:
962:
905:
727:
690:
665:
635:
352:
220:
196:
There are a few duplinks in the article body, they can be highlighted with this script (easy to install):
370:
Some of the sections, especially the first ones, seem rather short, is there no more info to add there?
1486:
1425:
1232:
I'm not sure it's precisely the same thing, but it UK the word more commonly used is (was, I gues)
1003:
972:
167:
607:"It wasn't until", "but it wasn't". Contractions are discouraged (done at least three times here).
1494:
1386:
1182:
1168:
1091:
1055:
1029:
980:
939:
name was appropriate, and Staffie when appropriate to be informal. However, not unlike my use of
925:
855:
813:
778:
740:
703:
558:
333:
305:
268:
243:
175:
150:
1515:
1467:
1105:
dating back to the 1880s+/-, and it is difficult to find corroborating accounts. There's also
886:
and added a few more breed associations in the lead of the Recognition section. I've added a
509:"subject of Sir Percy FitzPatrick’s book Jock of the Bushveld." Could give date for the book.
469:
You use both ise and ize endings; since this is a UK related article, best to stick with ise.
1519:
1498:
1471:
1415:
1390:
1375:
1341:
1308:
1259:
1211:
1186:
1172:
1157:
1122:
1095:
1080:
1033:
1019:
984:
965:
929:
908:
859:
817:
782:
744:
730:
707:
693:
668:
638:
562:
355:
337:
309:
272:
247:
179:
160:
1163:
Much clearer for me with the added context, thanks. Now, on to the talk page discussion...
1406:
1366:
1299:
1202:
1148:
1113:
1071:
1010:
995:
956:
934:
FM, I never would have recognized it if you had not recognised it. 😂 Re: your question:
899:
735:
The discussion seems to have stalled as soon as I commented there, so I guess so, hehe...
721:
684:
659:
629:
346:
285:
The infobox image has three different source links, only the first appears to be correct.
1460:
1288:
1062:
AKC eventually recognized AST and SBT as two separate breeds. According to Britannica:
949:
1362:, aside from the typical minor IP/newbie drive-by, all is quiet on the western front.
1505:
1490:
1454:
1395:
1382:
1359:
1191:
1178:
1164:
1087:
1025:
976:
921:
851:
809:
774:
736:
699:
554:
329:
301:
264:
239:
171:
146:
1511:
1463:
1446:
714:
1280:
1271:
in the lede, then I changed it to "vermin control", and recently it went back to
1059:
793:
1284:
712:
I remain optimistic that you will be able to continue the review uninterrupted.
382:
434:"Life span Over 12 years" This should also be stated under health, with source.
1403:
1363:
1315:
1296:
1227:
1199:
1145:
1110:
1068:
1007:
953:
896:
841:
What sets this breed apart from other similar breeds? - see Popularity section
799:
Re:links in lede - had to restore the citations as the material was challenged
718:
681:
656:
626:
343:
197:
999:
991:
1109:, but not everything falls quietly into place. Tomorrow's another day.
838:
Re:material cited in lede not seen in body - fixed, may not be verbatim
1106:
1144:
The segues weren't easy but I somehow managed to keep the flow.
398:
one, how has it been established that the author is "unknown"?
975:, which one might think is a much more contentious article...
325:
I meant on the file page, I removed them myself with this edit
300:
Still seeing multiple links to different photos under source?
794:
Still seeing multiple links to different photos under source?
457:
You also seem to switch randomly between KC and Kennel Club.
542:
You also use the abbreviation AKC before spelling it out.
322:
Removed wikilinks in info box (if that's what you meant)
1398:- just an FYI, added rat-baiting based on suggestion by
1276:
1272:
1268:
1043:
429:
See section Popularity (again)19:10, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
134:
103:
420:
What sets this breed apart from other similar breeds?
328:, so feel free to add the wikilinks you removed back.
1196:
Staffordshire Bull Terriers were used for rat-baiting
263:
Interesting, never seen such hidden captions before.
655:
Made a few modifications per William's suggestions.
796:- I've removed the dupe wikilinks in the image box.
1510:Just continue whatever you're doing without me. —
1459:I'm putting my response on the Staffie Talk page.
1442:Still one "ize" left, "AKC would not recognize".
342:I didn't know you were an (A) on Commons. Kewl.
1291:as a clandestine blood sport in the subsection
1046:mention of that breed in the lede because the
895:in your list above along with a few comments.
645:aren't in the sources cited in the body text.
8:
30:
497:Arranged chronologically in subsections.
936:physical differences from other breeds?
61:
33:
7:
1287:back to the lead, and a note about
1042:at the top of the page. I recently
24:
873:Re: The Kennel Club vs KC - fixed
948:
887:
713:
608:
597:
583:
572:
546:See lede where it's spelled out.
532:
521:
510:
481:
470:
458:
446:
435:
421:
410:
399:
385:
371:
312:
286:
253:
224:
210:
199:
186:
18:Talk:Staffordshire Bull Terrier
1048:American Staffordshire Terrier
1:
1050:is arguably the same as the
384:image seems rather dubious.
1275:because vermin-control was
1542:
1520:16:48, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
1499:03:59, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
1472:03:52, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
1416:17:47, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
1391:17:01, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
1376:11:41, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
1342:11:32, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
1309:17:43, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
1260:13:39, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
1212:04:20, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
1187:23:52, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
1173:19:24, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
1158:19:16, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
1123:03:01, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
1096:21:40, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
1081:21:38, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
1052:American Pit Bull Terrier
1034:18:44, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
1020:18:33, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
985:17:29, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
966:02:20, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
930:23:07, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
909:19:45, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
860:15:14, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
818:17:01, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
783:17:01, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
745:15:14, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
731:16:50, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
708:14:34, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
563:15:14, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
499:12:04, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
356:19:10, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
338:15:14, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
310:15:34, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
273:15:14, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
248:15:34, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
1402:- see my comment above.
694:23:11, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
669:14:29, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
639:04:49, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
238:Still seeing a gallery?
180:01:37, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
161:01:37, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
1040:not to be confused with
381:The sourcing of this
1487:Balfour Declaration
1400:Serial Number 54129
1004:Miniature Schnauzer
973:Balfour Declaration
466:- see reason below
454:- see reason below
395:Likewise with this
1445:I am unsure what
1409:
1369:
1302:
1224:
1205:
1151:
1116:
1074:
1013:
959:
902:
829:Round 3 - reasons
724:
687:
662:
632:
500:
349:
89:
88:
1533:
1509:
1458:
1407:
1367:
1339:
1334:
1327:
1319:
1300:
1293:Early protection
1257:
1252:
1245:
1231:
1218:
1203:
1149:
1114:
1072:
1061:
1011:
990:big boned dogs (
957:
952:
900:
894:
891:
890:
795:
722:
717:
685:
660:
630:
615:
612:
611:
604:
601:
600:
590:
587:
586:
579:
576:
575:
539:
536:
535:
528:
525:
524:
517:
514:
513:
498:
488:
485:
484:
477:
474:
473:
465:
462:
461:
453:
450:
449:
442:
439:
438:
428:
425:
424:
417:
414:
413:
406:
403:
402:
392:
389:
388:
378:
375:
374:
347:
319:
316:
315:
293:
290:
289:
260:
257:
256:
231:
228:
227:
217:
214:
213:
206:
203:
202:
193:
190:
189:
139:
130:
111:
43:Copyvio detector
31:
1541:
1540:
1536:
1535:
1534:
1532:
1531:
1530:
1503:
1452:
1411:
1371:
1337:
1330:
1323:
1313:
1304:
1255:
1248:
1241:
1225:
1207:
1153:
1118:
1076:
1015:
996:Giant Schnauzer
961:
904:
892:
888:
763:
726:
689:
664:
634:
613:
609:
602:
598:
588:
584:
577:
573:
537:
533:
526:
522:
515:
511:
486:
482:
475:
471:
463:
459:
451:
447:
440:
436:
426:
422:
415:
411:
404:
400:
390:
386:
376:
372:
351:
317:
313:
291:
287:
258:
254:
229:
225:
215:
211:
204:
200:
191:
187:
120:
97:
91:
85:
57:
29:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1539:
1537:
1529:
1528:
1527:
1526:
1525:
1524:
1523:
1522:
1477:
1476:
1475:
1474:
1443:
1440:
1436:
1432:
1429:
1426:Cavalryman V31
1421:
1420:
1419:
1418:
1405:
1365:
1357:
1356:
1355:
1354:
1353:
1352:
1351:
1350:
1349:
1348:
1347:
1346:
1345:
1344:
1311:
1298:
1289:badger-baiting
1201:
1147:
1142:
1141:
1140:
1139:
1138:
1137:
1136:
1135:
1134:
1133:
1132:
1131:
1130:
1129:
1128:
1127:
1126:
1125:
1112:
1098:
1070:
1009:
955:
912:
911:
898:
882:
881:
875:
874:
871:
867:
866:
865:
864:
863:
862:
843:
842:
839:
836:
832:
831:
825:
824:
823:
822:
821:
820:
801:
800:
797:
790:
789:
788:
787:
786:
785:
762:
759:
758:
757:
756:
755:
754:
753:
752:
751:
750:
749:
748:
747:
720:
683:
672:
671:
658:
653:
652:individualism.
649:
646:
628:
622:
621:
617:
616:
605:
594:
580:
568:
567:
566:
565:
548:
547:
540:
529:
518:
506:
505:
504:
503:
502:
501:
490:
489:
478:
467:
455:
443:
431:
430:
418:
407:
393:
379:
367:
366:
365:
364:
363:
362:
361:
360:
359:
358:
345:
295:
294:
282:
281:
280:
279:
278:
277:
276:
275:
233:
232:
218:
207:
194:
182:
168:William Harris
140:
87:
86:
84:
83:
78:
73:
67:
64:
63:
59:
58:
56:
55:
53:External links
50:
45:
39:
36:
35:
28:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1538:
1521:
1517:
1513:
1507:
1502:
1501:
1500:
1496:
1492:
1489:article was.
1488:
1483:
1482:
1481:
1480:
1479:
1478:
1473:
1469:
1465:
1461:
1456:
1451:
1450:
1448:
1444:
1441:
1437:
1433:
1430:
1427:
1423:
1422:
1417:
1414:
1410:
1404:
1401:
1397:
1394:
1393:
1392:
1388:
1384:
1380:
1379:
1378:
1377:
1374:
1370:
1364:
1361:
1343:
1340:
1335:
1333:
1328:
1326:
1317:
1312:
1310:
1307:
1303:
1297:
1294:
1290:
1286:
1282:
1278:
1274:
1270:
1265:
1264:
1263:
1262:
1261:
1258:
1253:
1251:
1246:
1244:
1238:
1235:
1229:
1222:
1217:
1216:
1215:
1214:
1213:
1210:
1206:
1200:
1197:
1193:
1190:
1189:
1188:
1184:
1180:
1176:
1175:
1174:
1170:
1166:
1162:
1161:
1160:
1159:
1156:
1152:
1146:
1124:
1121:
1117:
1111:
1108:
1103:
1099:
1097:
1093:
1089:
1084:
1083:
1082:
1079:
1075:
1069:
1065:
1057:
1053:
1049:
1045:
1041:
1037:
1036:
1035:
1031:
1027:
1023:
1022:
1021:
1018:
1014:
1008:
1005:
1001:
997:
993:
988:
987:
986:
982:
978:
974:
969:
968:
967:
964:
960:
954:
951:
946:
942:
937:
933:
932:
931:
927:
923:
918:
917:
916:
915:
914:
913:
910:
907:
903:
897:
884:
883:
880:
877:
876:
872:
869:
868:
861:
857:
853:
849:
848:
847:
846:
845:
844:
840:
837:
834:
833:
830:
827:
826:
819:
815:
811:
807:
806:
805:
804:
803:
802:
798:
792:
791:
784:
780:
776:
772:
771:
770:
769:
768:
767:
766:
760:
746:
742:
738:
734:
733:
732:
729:
725:
719:
716:
711:
710:
709:
705:
701:
697:
696:
695:
692:
688:
682:
678:
677:
676:
675:
674:
673:
670:
667:
663:
657:
654:
650:
647:
643:
642:
641:
640:
637:
633:
627:
619:
618:
606:
595:
593:
581:
570:
569:
564:
560:
556:
552:
551:
550:
549:
545:
541:
530:
519:
508:
507:
496:
495:
494:
493:
492:
491:
479:
468:
456:
444:
433:
432:
419:
408:
397:
394:
383:
380:
369:
368:
357:
354:
350:
344:
341:
340:
339:
335:
331:
327:
324:
323:
321:
320:
311:
307:
303:
299:
298:
297:
296:
284:
283:
274:
270:
266:
262:
261:
251:
250:
249:
245:
241:
237:
236:
235:
234:
222:
219:
208:
198:
195:
183:
181:
177:
173:
169:
165:
164:
163:
162:
158:
155:
152:
148:
145:
141:
138:
137:
133:
128:
124:
119:
118:
114:
109:
105:
101:
96:
95:
82:
79:
77:
74:
72:
69:
68:
66:
65:
60:
54:
51:
49:
46:
44:
41:
40:
38:
37:
32:
26:
19:
1358:
1332:SerialNumber
1331:
1324:
1292:
1250:SerialNumber
1249:
1242:
1233:
1195:
1143:
1063:
1058:of the AST:
1039:
944:
940:
935:
878:
828:
764:
623:
591:
543:
221:WP:Galleries
153:
143:
142:
135:
131:
117:Article talk
116:
112:
93:
90:
81:Instructions
1273:rat-baiting
879:Final round
104:visual edit
1283:. I added
1277:challenged
1269:originally
1038:We have a
761:Discussion
620:Discussion
48:Authorship
34:GA toolbox
1000:Schnauzer
144:Reviewer:
71:Templates
62:Reviewing
27:GA Review
1506:FunkMonk
1491:FunkMonk
1455:FunkMonk
1439:article.
1424:Ok, per
1396:FunkMonk
1383:FunkMonk
1360:FunkMonk
1221:watching
1192:FunkMonk
1179:FunkMonk
1165:FunkMonk
1088:FunkMonk
1056:AKC says
1026:FunkMonk
992:molosser
977:FunkMonk
922:FunkMonk
852:FunkMonk
810:FunkMonk
775:FunkMonk
737:FunkMonk
700:FunkMonk
555:FunkMonk
330:FunkMonk
302:FunkMonk
265:FunkMonk
240:FunkMonk
172:FunkMonk
157:contribs
147:FunkMonk
76:Criteria
1512:Nomopbs
1464:Nomopbs
1447:Nomopbs
1285:ratting
1234:ratting
1044:removed
127:history
108:history
94:Article
1281:source
1236:; see
1338:54129
1316:Atsme
1256:54129
1228:Atsme
1002:vs a
998:vs a
136:Watch
16:<
1516:talk
1495:talk
1468:talk
1408:Talk
1387:talk
1368:Talk
1301:Talk
1204:Talk
1183:talk
1169:talk
1150:Talk
1115:Talk
1107:this
1102:this
1100:See
1092:talk
1073:Talk
1030:talk
1012:Talk
981:talk
958:Talk
926:talk
901:Talk
856:talk
814:talk
779:talk
741:talk
723:Talk
704:talk
686:Talk
661:Talk
631:Talk
559:talk
348:Talk
334:talk
306:talk
269:talk
244:talk
176:talk
151:talk
123:edit
100:edit
945:ise
943:vs
941:ize
1518:)
1497:)
1470:)
1462:—
1413:📧
1389:)
1373:📧
1325:——
1306:📧
1295:.
1243:——
1209:📧
1185:)
1171:)
1155:📧
1120:📧
1094:)
1078:📧
1032:)
1017:📧
983:)
963:📧
928:)
906:📧
858:)
816:)
781:)
743:)
728:📧
706:)
691:📧
666:📧
636:📧
561:)
544:??
353:📧
336:)
308:)
271:)
246:)
178:)
159:)
125:|
106:|
102:|
1514:(
1508::
1504:@
1493:(
1466:(
1457::
1453:@
1385:(
1318::
1314:@
1230::
1226:@
1223:)
1219:(
1181:(
1167:(
1090:(
1028:(
979:(
924:(
893:Y
854:(
812:(
777:(
739:(
702:(
614:Y
603:Y
589:Y
578:Y
557:(
538:Y
527:Y
516:Y
487:Y
476:Y
464:Y
452:Y
441:Y
427:Y
416:Y
405:Y
391:Y
377:Y
332:(
318:Y
304:(
292:Y
267:(
259:Y
242:(
230:Y
216:Y
205:Y
192:Y
174:(
154:·
149:(
132:·
129:)
121:(
113:·
110:)
98:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.