21:
78:
I'd find more specific examples later, but I just linked a thread that shows some of Saxton's enemies at TFN, and a second showing some of Paul
Hidalgo's antics. When I expand the third paragraph into another "Criticisms" section in the AOTC vein, I'd try and find specific TFN threads involving each
54:
I'd have to admit you fused the first two paragraphs pretty well. However, I think the third paragraph is also important and its contents may be condensed, but not deleted. Because I don't have time to fix it all just yet, I'd just pull the old paragraph out. Maybe you can try to fuse it. Later, I
62:
If we can substantiate the third paragraph and cite, then I'm all for keeping it. Also, should we consider collapsing SWTC into a larger Star Wars "fanon" article (or something else that exists)? I'm going to propose doing the same for SD.net.
31:
44:
Addressed lack of NPOV and tightened up the language. Last paragraph and ICS aside were unnecessary for an article dealing with SWTC. Please correct any errors. --
55:
hope to dramatically expand the page. As it is, the thing is at stub length. If we are going to have an article at all, let's have one that's full-sized.
27:
80:
20:
83:
48:
64:
45:
15:
8:
7:
14:
19:
26:This article was nominated for
30:on May 5, 2007. The result of
1:
104:
84:15:46, 1 June 2005 (UTC)
49:06:07, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
67:06:31, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
81:Kazuaki Shimazaki
42:
41:
95:
23:
16:
103:
102:
98:
97:
96:
94:
93:
92:
12:
11:
5:
101:
99:
91:
90:
89:
88:
87:
86:
71:
70:
69:
68:
57:
56:
40:
39:
32:the discussion
24:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
100:
85:
82:
77:
76:
75:
74:
73:
72:
66:
61:
60:
59:
58:
53:
52:
51:
50:
47:
37:
33:
29:
25:
22:
18:
17:
43:
36:no consensus
35:
79:point. --
65:Rev Prez
46:Rev Prez
28:deletion
34:was
63:--
38:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
