800:
well be included in a marketing or development section of a product's article, but often these are remarks made by someone who works for the company that is building, developing, or branding the product in question. On the other hand, I'm not sure that said "entity" necessarily needs to qualify for having a standalone article in order to make an appearance in another article's body. I'm not aware of a policy that supports or demands that requirement. Also, despite the fact that we will eventually know the outcome or direction of the issue at hand, the point of including early speculation is that it documents the atmosphere surrounding the fate of a new or retired product before its future is known. The state of the unknown (purposely being fueled by Cedar Point in this situation) is considered encyclopedic in my opinion. It demonstrates historical perspective, even if only covering a slice or moment in time. Perhaps we'll disagree there, but I'll take some additional time to consider possible areas where we can reach a compromise. We may also want to consider notifying the WikiProject if we are unable to reach a consensus, to see if additional opinions can help move us in the right direction. I am also willing to concede that I may very well be in the minority on this one. --
838:, it doesn't appear he is referenced in reliable sources in other regions across the country. Furthermore, the comments cited are almost always fan-based propaganda and rarely do they contain substantial insight within the industry as a whole. The comments are often just fluff added to an article in an attempt to show how fans are reacting to news, but there is nothing particularly scientific or even professional at times in the way he attempts to represent that aspect. It usually comes off as one man's opinion as opposed to the greater population.Because the value added is minimal, I agree that we should refrain from quotes and mentioning him by name, and only make a one- or two-line summary statement regarding speculation when it benefits the article. In this case, we should consider adding a one-liner like you proposed, but it may not be necessary unless we have two or more sources making these claims, and it would help if at least one source was located outside of the region. Perhaps that is the ultimate litmus test; if a source outside of the region recognizes that the speculation exists, then we should feel compelled to include that somewhere in the article's body. --
785:
Ironically, I happen to personally believe it is, but that is pure speculation based on viewing the ride this past weekend. I can concede the second part of the edit in question has value, if framed differently (in my opinion), but I am struggling with this part being anything more than speculation and rumor. If Putz was a retired Cedar Point build executive, or a notable expert in that field (a Google search is not showing much beyond the blog itself), I could maybe see the argument for exception. However, he is basically a news reporter, and I am not familiar of other examples of reporters speculating on future directions of products being included in articles. I recognize it being included in a newspaper adds weight, but as I said before, speculation being in fan sites or news outlets seems far more logical than being in a neutral fact-based knowledge resource. --
1781:"Chess". Go to Cedar Point & see for yourself. And thanks so much for reverting my picture caption in the Cedar Point article. I KNEW you were gonna do that. You just couldn't leave it alone? Everything has to conform to your standards? I don't think that's right. Not at all. I already said there is not a THING wrong with adding more detail to a picture caption (doesn't matter if you think the main focus in it is the Sky Ride). But, no. It has to be your way. I really don't understand why you insist on suppressing me like this. It isn't right. But then again, I have nowhere NEAR 21,000 edits, so I must not know what I'm doing, right? I'm really sick of this frustration. I guess I shouldn't edit anything, huh? Cause you're sure to just revert right back, right?
762:
Perhaps if this was in a review section - which is generally where those outside comments appear. Also, I am again not sure that I would qualify the founder of this blog as an expert in the field. They are, at best, a commentator on the field. Regarding who it would benefit, I am not sure that is the point of an encyclopedia. Information around MANY things not allowed on
Knowledge might be interesting to the reader, but are not encyclopedic. The reality is that ultimately this is speculation on a product that will be clarified in the future. It is not something abstract, like the meaning of a film's ending, which could remain abstract forever. I would argue that offering this information is the responsibility of a news or fan outlet, and not an encyclopedia. --
663:
matter how strong their connections to the staff might be, are "recognized entities in a field". I cannot find examples of him being recognized by the industry for his expertise, or cited as an industry expert - perhaps beyond that one article, but even there it gives the blog as his credentials. By this measure, there is no difference between the WSJ commenting on the iPhone and the AppleInsider blog - when in reality I think there is in fact a stark difference between the expertise levels of those two entities. I think it is hard for WP to argue that blogs are not reliable sources, but their founders are experts in the field - those conclusions seem to be in direct conflict to me. --
1707:
clearly incorrect, or what looks like obvious vandalism, please revert it back to the original content? I just cleaned up the page for Steel
Vengeance, which had a rather disturbing amount of vandalism. Apparently, these vandals have nothing better to do, than go around defacing pages as they see fit. Knowledge is here for everyone to enjoy, but when vandals are abusing the opportunity to edit a page, it creates frustration & disharmony within the community. It's a shame when honest editors like myself feel obligated to almost police these pages, making sure nothing had been done to them. So, as I said, if you see something wrong, please correct it.
174:
143:
815:
know when this type of debate has come up around iPhones, the outcome has been to wait until the official details are announced. I would argue the speculation around iPhones is similar and perhaps even more notable, but still does not result in us documenting that speculation before the details are announced by Apple. Perhaps a compromise is including that because CP has not stated they are tearing it down "has led to speculation around the ride structure's ultimate fate." or something along those lines that acknowledges the climate of speculation, but does not engage in the speculation. --
1550:
503:. This person's opinion is very interesting to fans, but hardly encyclopedic in nature to people wanting to learn facts. Also, the founder of a blog is not a reliable source for something like attendance dropping unless they are citing park data (which does not appear to be the case here - it comes off more as a personal opinion). Realistically the only reliable source for that is Cedar Point, unless PointBuzz was independently counting riders over the past several years...which seems highly unlikely. --
483:). This is disruptive and should be discussed at this point. While it is true that PointBuzz.com is an unofficial website, they are often cited by reliable sources for receiving first-hand information from park officials. This level of "trust" by journalists indicate that the unofficial site carries weight as a reliable source, especially when their comments are published by other reliable sources. If you would like to challenge this, state your reasons here and refrain from sparring in the article. --
317:
290:
546:
unofficial relationship with Cedar Fair and are often privy to details before their official release, effectively making Putz an industry insider with valued connections. I will provide examples soon. So while I agree that blogs in general should be avoided, this isn't about some blog. It's about the credibility of a widely-recognized entity that just so happens to have been a founder of a blog. Since we are not citing his blog, I don't see a contradiction. --
234:
327:
258:
21:
112:
420:
1506:
432:
648:, for example, only covers which topics qualify as having standalone articles. It does not cover content within an article, meaning that significant information supported by reliable sources can exist within articles, even when the source in question does not qualify to have its own article on Knowledge. I don't believe this is a standard we need to adhere to here. --
747:
show that it is mere, unfounded conjecture to suggest that it only pertains to fans.Look, I can understand why some might feel this content is unnecessary. But let's call it what it is: an opinion by an editor. Let's not make the wild stretch that this is somehow in violation of
Knowledge policies and guidelines. --
531:
the community does not treat blogs favorably - I was actually trying to throw that topic some favor by suggesting I personally disagree with that consensus. ;) That said, I am as always willing to concede I could absolutely be wrong about this, and look forward to seeing if we can come to some consensus. --
1706:
I implore all of my fellow mature editors to please be vigilant regarding this matter. As of today, Sunday, December 2, 2018, there has been an inordinate amount of vandalism occurring on various pages. Some of it has been happening on various Cedar Point roller coaster pages. If you see something
1687:
I'd take a picture of it for further evidence, but I think we're all aware of the banned cell phone policy for Steel
Vengeance. So, if that helps to influence a name change under 'Characteristics', so be it. If not, I will not press it, as I do not wish to upset the current content. Thank you. Â :)
1463:
In the short history of the revamped ride, the incident (though minor) is a significant part of the ride's history. Other roller coaster articles often have incidents mentioned as well. WP:NOTNEWS doesn't apply here, as that policy is founded on the principle of excluding trivial details mentioned in
545:
Thank you for the kind words. Though I intend to respond fully below, I wanted to point out here that while it appears to be a contradiction on the surface, my position isn't that this is just some blog founder making comments. I believe he and others that work for PointBuzz.com have formed a direct,
1686:
As far as the trains' names go, I tend to agree with
Sipriceaz. I went to Cedar Point 3 times over the Summer of '18, & rode Steel Vengeance one time on each visit. The train that some believe is called "Wild One" actually does say "Chess" on the train. I know, because I saw it with my eyes.
1193:
Just make sure we have the statements about the new name added to the article itself with proper references. Then move the article to the new name. Also don't forget to fix links from other articles like Cedar Point, and update their links as well. There is a link over to the left of the page called
1795:
Furthermore, where is there proof or a source that that train is named "Wild One"? CERTAINLY not on the train itself, because clearly written on the side of the train is "Chess". "Blackjack", "Digger", & "Chess" (NOT "Wild One") are the train names. But, I'm not able to correct this, because
1780:
This is absolutely ridiculous. You want a source? The only source I can provide is the train itself. It CLEARLY SAYS "Chess" on the side of it. NOWHERE on the actual train does it even say "Wild One" on it. I'm tired if this. I'm tired of the same person STUBBORNLY fighting me on this!! It's
852:
That seems like a reasonable metric regarding speculation. I personally think once facts are stated in local press, that is fine for inclusion (the reality being some details do not get interest beyond local area). However, for speculation, I think having a slightly higher bar makes sense to filter
1869:
That is a reasonable compromise, thank you. As far as the CP picture caption, I'm just gonna let it go. I wanted to add more detail, but you feel it's unnecessary, so I accept that. I get kinda passionate about some of my edits, so that's why I take exception sometimes when someone else doesn't
917:
I cleaned up recent additions that covered this topic. We can mention it with appropriate sourcing, but it needs to be very brief and generalized like it is now. I imagine it won't be too long before we get a confirmation by the park. Remember, Knowledge is an encyclopedia which favors a long-term
814:
I also concede in advance that I could be in the minority, and will certainly go with consensus if we get to that. :) I can appreciate the point about speculation itself creating an environment worth noting, I think it is including the actual speculation itself I am struggling with. For example, I
799:
Thank you for your feedback. It really is appreciated! I think you've brought up quite a few valid points I hadn't considered. I'll take some time to look them over closely later in the day before I respond in detail. My initial thoughts are that published speculation by a reliable source can very
741:
Of all the statements above, this is probably the one I disagree with the most. Have you ever visited a book or film article? If so, you would have probably noticed the extensive coverage surrounding a work's critical reception. Opinions by experts in the field are all over
Knowledge, and being an
694:
Generally, I would tend to agree with this; we shouldn't use numbers arbitrarily from a weak source. However, there are two problems with applying that to this situation. First, Putz wasn't the only entity implying that the ride's popularity was in decline. The article's author also stated, "Lines
530:
I appreciate you engaging in a good faith discussion on the topic. I have a lot of respect for your work on the wiki, and am genuinely trying to offer a fresh perspective on the topic. I am surprised, I will admit, that you are both defending the credibility of blog's founder and pointing out that
890:
I was just wondering if we should include the likely chanced that Mean Streak will be getting the I Box
Treatment similar to Twisted Colossus and The New Texas Giant. I do believe including this is logical, However, I will need to find a good article to back this up (Which I can get). But I don't
746:
does not make it unencyclopedic. Furthermore, you are making your own assumption that it only benefits fans. What about someone who heard it on the news and landed on
Knowledge looking for more information? Do they have to be a fan to find this information useful? A strong argument can be made to
587:
we are trying to use here is not a blog. It is a reputable newspaper publication written by an author who has extensively covered news about Cedar Point. There are probably dozens of articles (if not hundreds) cited on
Knowledge by this author. The material in question is the author's "interview"
498:
Personally, I think it is fine to cite blogs for citations. However, including commentary from them in an article is a stretch - it comes off as promoting them more than contributing to the topic. It would perhaps make sense on
Wikinews, but does not seem to make as much sense on Knowledge. Also,
761:
One big problem is that books or films, as works of art, are by their nature subject to interpretation and opinion. Those opinions on the art is a part of the knowledge around that subject. The same is not as true for speculation around a product - which is essentially what a roller coaster is.
662:
As you cited above, the policy around speculation says "reliable, expert sources or recognized entities in a field" - which to me then speaks to how we assess a source, and sadly, like we have discussed, blogs are not considered reliable sources. I am not sure that the founder of a fan blog, no
784:
in 2014." I think my problem is that the words used are very speculative in nature, rather than fact based - "a company like", "recalling a similar announcement" are phrases more connected to speculation. The reality is that we still do not factually know if this is the direction of the ride.
1842:
The nicknames in the source are in quotes, so that's what we've provided in the article. We are not necessarily saying these are the names that appear on the trains, and that seems to be what you're getting completely worked up about. We could rephrase that sentence to simply say,
1895:
OK, unless someone else chimes in here, feel free to make the change to this article, or I can later when I get around to it. As for other items like the caption getting reverted, I will only usually revert edits that are clearly going against policy or rub up against our
829:
After putting a lot of thought into this, additional research, and taking your concerns into consideration, I've found myself agreeing with your position. While Putz is somewhat well-known locally in the region, as he is often cited by local newspapers the
520:: First of all, THANK YOU for engaging in a discussion. The absence of one with the other editor was becoming frustrating! There really is no harm in leaving the content in the article while we have a discussion, but I do understand why you removed it.
1900:. Otherwise, I'll just make changes to your edit (if they're quick changes) that I believe fix those problems. I'm always willing to discuss on the article's talk page though. I'm sure most of the time we can figure out a compromise when needed. --
695:
for the ride are generally short". Second, this is written as if it's common knowledge and not as if it's the opinion of one person. If you challenge this, then you're challenging the credibility of a well-cited author and newspaper as well.
1750:
True, but the only mention of having the most inversions is preceded by the comment "Steel Vengeance broke 10 world records when it opened." These records are not expected to last forever. As written, the section on World Records remains
588:
with a known expert in the industry, Jeff Putz. We can clearly rationalize that if he wasn't an expert, or if his opinion didn't carry any weight, then this article (or any article for that matter) wouldn't have bothered to cover it.
1464:
insignificant events. This wasn't some trivial detail or insignificant event. It caused ride closures, a limited capacity for several weeks, and forced the manufacturer to revisit the design/operation of the loading queue. --
1953:
First, keep in mind that this is not an article about records in general, so talking about Iron Gwazi here probably doesn't make sense. Second, what exactly are you looking to do? Can you provide some examples (and
1480:
Since this is the only incident thus far, it probably doesn't need to be sectioned off in its own subsection. I've modified that and also trimmed unnecessary details out of the description shortening the paragraph.
1445:
applies? Doesn't seem like there should be a only section about one minor incident, which doesn't really contribute to the article. Don't really need a whole subsection for a small event like that. Thoughts?
2007:
267:
248:
157:
622:
again. Speculative comments are not banned in whole on Knowledge. In fact, it says, "Predictions, speculation, forecasts and theories stated by reliable, expert sources or recognized entities in a field
1847:"This way, we're not making any claims about what does or does not appear on the train itself, and honestly, none of that really matters anyway. Does that sound like a reasonable compromise?As for
243:
153:
2002:
2047:
1671:? The trains are named after fictional characters âBlackjackâ Chamberlain, Chess âWild Oneâ Watkins and Wyatt âDiggerâ Dempsey. The statement in the article correctly lists the nicknames. --
1178:
Anybody who opposes the article being moved to the new name once the ride is announced should air their grievances here other wise the article will be moved once the name is revealed.
2027:
1851:
at Cedar Point, we can discuss that further on that article's talk page if you so desire. The length of the caption you created is not only unacceptable, but it's also unnecessary. --
1873:
I apologize for seemingly making it a personal attack towards you. I was angry & upset, but that is not an excuse. I know (like me) you're only trying to improve the content.
357:
2012:
1845:
Its three trains are each based on a character from the themed backstory of the ride: Jackson "Blackjack" Chamberlain, Chess "Wild One" Watkins and Wyatt "Digger" Dempsey.
374:
1596:
that is often used, especially when sources disagree. If you have another source that says something else, we can discuss it, but it most likely won't override RCDB. --
2022:
1997:
272:
224:
214:
712:
As a compromise on this point, what about language that talks about the declining popularity of the ride, cites this article, and the others that you mentioned. --
2042:
1260:
1120:
1116:
1102:
990:
986:
972:
630:
I would be willing to agree that Putz is a recognized entity in the field if he was notable enough to have an article. I disagree that he meets this exception. --
410:
400:
1729:
Since the first of July, Steel Vengeance doesn't have the most inversions on a hybrid coaster. Untamed in Walibi Holland (by RMC) was opened with 5 inversions.
32:
1987:
2067:
698:
If that is the case, I see no problem mentioning this issue and citing it with those sources. I think my problem is framing it as a commentary from him. --
364:
190:
1068:
2017:
1992:
906:
2037:
369:
853:
if it is recognized or not. I appreciate your thoughtful processing of this and that some civil on-wiki discussion resulted in a compromise. :) --
1557:
1078:
583:
written by professionals, and even then, they should only be cited with caution. Regardless of how you feel, this is not a relevant point. The
2057:
1939:
450:
181:
148:
776:
I am trying to ponder a compromise on this line: "PointBuzz.com co-founder Jeff Putz believes Cedar Point will partner with a company like
627:...". Putz is being used as a "recognized entity in the field" by a reliable source, and therefore his commentary qualifies for inclusion.
1244:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
1088:
1399:
1339:
340:
295:
50:
2062:
352:
1098:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
968:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
2032:
1982:
1835:...outcasts Jackson "Blackjack" Chamberlain, Chess "Wild One" Watkins and Wyatt "Digger" Dempsey have returned to FrontierTown...
1289:
614:"...what is being added is a rumor and theory - not a factual statement - which in itself seems to disqualify it from inclusion."
1827:
2052:
1556:
it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a
958:
38:
348:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
1919:
I just adjusted the train names description, as per your recommendation. Incase you weren't able to get to it later. Â ;)
902:
1390:
1163:
1033:
737:"This person's opinion is very interesting to fans, but hardly encyclopedic in nature to people wanting to learn facts."
584:
123:
1574:
777:
1069:
https://web.archive.org/web/20120702055704/http://www.cedarpoint.com/blog-article/online-fun/Mean-Streak-is-less-Mean
173:
142:
891:
want another disaster like the Tower Of Terror article that I added so I would like know if this should be added.
445:
300:
1588:
Based on your recent edit attempt, it appears you are trying to modify the speed. I want to stress that the cited
1943:
1417:
1377:
1335:
1235:
781:
1119:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
989:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
1615:
1301:
1183:
898:
90:
1740:
1209:
We should be sure to preserve the coaster stats of Mean Streak, maybe even add a comparison like they did at
1072:
1924:
1878:
1801:
1786:
1712:
1692:
1512:
1403:
1343:
1320:
1154:
1079:
https://web.archive.org/web/20160801185807/https://www.cedarpoint.com/events/things-to-do/events/Mean-Streak
1060:
1024:
950:
1796:
Gonein60 will just change it back (wrongly) to "Wild One". NO ONE can understand my frustration here. =(
1652:
Steel Vengeanceâs trains are named Blackjack, Digger, and Chess. The article mistakenly Chess âWild Oneâ,
1538:
1385:
1736:
1657:
1427:
1245:
1138:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
1126:
1008:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
996:
129:
20:
1534:
1059:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
949:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
1089:
https://web.archive.org/web/20120225164418/http://www.cedarpoint.com/rides/Roller-Coasters/Mean-Streak
1274:
894:
332:
1653:
1082:
1611:
1452:
1297:
1179:
189:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1963:
1920:
1905:
1874:
1856:
1811:
1797:
1782:
1708:
1688:
1676:
1601:
1486:
1469:
1316:
1214:
1199:
923:
843:
805:
752:
653:
580:
551:
488:
1938:
Can someone put the records that are still held by Steve, including the ones lost by iron gwazi
1123:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
993:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
690:"Also, the founder of a blog is not a reliable source for something like attendance dropping..."
316:
289:
1139:
1009:
1761:
1442:
1362:
1092:
858:
820:
790:
767:
717:
703:
668:
635:
619:
596:
536:
508:
42:
1210:
959:
https://web.archive.org/web/20131125024355/http://www.martin-vleminckx.com/mva_web_3_027.htm
472:
1146:
1016:
1568:
1381:
1293:
1265:
1194:"What links here" that you can click on and see what other articles have the old links. --
576:
500:
1593:
1447:
1105:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
975:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
233:
186:
1145:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
1015:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
499:
what is being added is a rumor and theory - not a factual statement - which in itself
1976:
1959:
1901:
1897:
1852:
1672:
1668:
1637:
1597:
1482:
1465:
1218:
1195:
919:
839:
801:
748:
649:
547:
525:
484:
345:
1334:
a minor fictional character which gets no real-world coverage definitely is not the
962:
475:, you should opt to discuss why you keep removing content that is reliably sourced (
1955:
1752:
1358:
854:
816:
786:
763:
713:
699:
664:
631:
592:
532:
517:
504:
257:
1814:: Take a breather. This isn't personal. The text in the article currently reads:
1112:
1052:
982:
942:
645:
437:
1562:
1426:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a
1395:
1111:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
981:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
780:
to refurbish the ride, recalling a similar announcement by the park regarding
575:
Really? The community's stance on this is quite the opposite, as indicated by
427:
322:
579:. They are "largely not acceptable as sources" with the sole exception being
1732:
As the page is locked to prevent vandalism, I thought I'd leave a comment.
344:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
1073:
http://www.cedarpoint.com/blog-article/online-fun/Mean-Streak-is-less-Mean
419:
1819:
Its three new trains are nicknamed "Blackjack," "Digger," and "Wild One."
1384:
and a hatnote on this article. This is what I had in mind when I AfC/Râd
1967:
1947:
1928:
1909:
1882:
1860:
1805:
1790:
1769:
1744:
1716:
1696:
1680:
1661:
1619:
1605:
1581:
1542:
1490:
1473:
1457:
1407:
1368:
1347:
1324:
1305:
1283:
1221:
1203:
1187:
1168:
1038:
927:
910:
862:
847:
824:
809:
794:
771:
756:
721:
707:
672:
657:
639:
600:
555:
540:
512:
492:
1533:
Some of the information stated under the statistics box is incorrect.
1338:, and I don't see any other potentially-notable topics by this name.
1296:â Only article that is called Steel Vengeance now. Do not sign this.
918:
approach, unlike a basic talk forum that thrives on breaking news. --
644:
I am not aware of such a requirement in any policies or guidelines.
1083:
https://www.cedarpoint.com/events/things-to-do/events/Mean-Streak
1500:
105:
1610:
It wonât override RCDB even Cedar Pointâs website says 74mph.
1589:
571:"Personally, I think it is fine to cite blogs for citations."
418:
256:
232:
1394:
character with the same name as the real radio personality
1093:
http://www.cedarpoint.com/rides/Roller-Coasters/Mean-Streak
1063:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
953:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
479:), even after I've left you a message on your talk page (
2008:
Mid-importance Cedar Fair Entertainment Company articles
1848:
1312:
1056:
946:
480:
476:
83:
1416:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
185:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
1248:. No further edits should be made to this section.
1115:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
985:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
2003:GA-Class Cedar Fair Entertainment Company articles
1638:https://www.cedarpoint.com/explore/steel-vengeance
1430:. No further edits should be made to this section.
1213:. If you have any questions, please contact me at
2048:GA-Class United States articles of Low-importance
1441:I don't think it should be in the article. Maybe
963:http://www.martin-vleminckx.com/mva_web_3_027.htm
1833:
1817:
2028:WikiProject Roller Coasters articles and lists
1101:This message was posted before February 2018.
971:This message was posted before February 2018.
48:If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
8:
1722:Untamed (Walibi Holland) has more inversions
1497:Semi-protected edit request on 20 June 2018
244:Cedar Fair Entertainment Company task force
1958:that support what you're trying to do)? --
1234:The following is a closed discussion of a
941:I have just modified one external link on
892:
284:
137:
62:
15:
2013:Cedar Fair Entertainment Company articles
1051:I have just modified 3 external links on
2023:High-importance roller coaster articles
1998:High-importance amusement park articles
1630:
286:
139:
1844:
1437:Opening Day Incident really necessary?
736:
689:
613:
570:
2043:Low-importance United States articles
501:seems to disqualify it from inclusion
199:Knowledge:WikiProject Amusement Parks
7:
1253:The result of the move request was:
338:This article is within the scope of
202:Template:WikiProject Amusement Parks
179:This article is within the scope of
111:
109:
1988:Sports and recreation good articles
1735:Best regards from the Netherlands,
1355:disambiguation no longer necessary.
468:Comments from PointBuzz.com founder
385:Knowledge:WikiProject United States
128:It is of interest to the following
33:Sports and recreation good articles
2068:WikiProject United States articles
1380:redirect to the current target of
591:Hence the word "personally". ;) --
388:Template:WikiProject United States
14:
1055:. Please take a moment to review
945:. Please take a moment to review
41:. If you can improve it further,
2018:GA-Class roller coaster articles
1993:GA-Class amusement park articles
1648:Edit needed in âCharacteristicsâ
1548:
1504:
1311:So the Marvel comics cyborg was
1290:Steel Vengeance (roller coaster)
430:
325:
315:
288:
172:
141:
110:
19:
2038:GA-Class United States articles
405:This article has been rated as
219:This article has been rated as
1227:Requested move 7 December 2017
29:has been listed as one of the
1:
1968:18:33, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
1948:16:29, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
1697:16:14, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
1376:per above, and also create a
1284:17:18, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
928:16:56, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
618:I invite you to closely read
443:This article is supported by
265:This article is supported by
241:This article is supported by
193:and see a list of open tasks.
2058:Low-importance Ohio articles
1717:02:50, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
1681:08:52, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
1408:04:57, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
1391:The Amazing World of Gumball
1369:17:48, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
1348:16:39, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
1325:09:55, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
1306:05:13, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
911:15:03, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
863:16:12, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
848:10:07, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
825:16:34, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
810:12:24, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
795:04:06, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
772:03:45, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
757:02:56, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
722:03:59, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
708:03:45, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
673:16:34, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
658:12:45, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
640:03:45, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
601:03:45, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
556:12:35, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
541:03:56, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
513:21:13, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
493:10:58, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
1527:to reactivate your request.
1515:has been answered. Set the
1378:Steel Vengeance (character)
1222:17:23, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
778:Rocky Mountain Construction
182:WikiProject Amusement Parks
2084:
1592:states 74 mph, which is a
1132:(last update: 5 June 2024)
1048:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
1039:17:54, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
1002:(last update: 5 June 2024)
938:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
411:project's importance scale
268:Roller Coasters task force
225:project's importance scale
2063:WikiProject Ohio articles
1662:14:33, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
1606:03:45, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
1582:00:53, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
1543:00:15, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
1491:13:32, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
1474:13:19, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
1315:hmm. Lack of enthusiasm.
1204:21:55, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
1188:18:50, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
426:
404:
341:WikiProject United States
310:
264:
240:
218:
167:
136:
65:
61:
1929:22:40, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
1910:15:59, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
1883:15:33, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
1861:05:38, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
1806:17:23, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
1791:14:36, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
1770:00:23, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
1745:21:45, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
1620:06:32, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
1458:06:32, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
1423:Please do not modify it.
1241:Please do not modify it.
1169:05:35, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
346:United States of America
2033:Amusement park articles
1983:Knowledge good articles
1044:External links modified
934:External links modified
205:amusement park articles
2053:GA-Class Ohio articles
1837:
1821:
1386:Banana Joe (character)
423:
391:United States articles
261:
237:
118:This article is rated
422:
260:
236:
39:good article criteria
1261:closed by page mover
1113:regular verification
983:regular verification
883:Possible RMC sources
333:United States portal
91:Good article nominee
1103:After February 2018
973:After February 2018
899:Marth The Hero King
359:Articles Requested!
1336:WP:PRIMARYREDIRECT
1157:InternetArchiveBot
1108:InternetArchiveBot
1027:InternetArchiveBot
978:InternetArchiveBot
424:
262:
238:
124:content assessment
66:Article milestones
1531:
1530:
1366:
1264:
1133:
1003:
913:
897:comment added by
465:
464:
461:
460:
457:
456:
283:
282:
279:
278:
104:
103:
100:
99:
84:February 25, 2013
57:
2075:
1956:reliable sources
1849:your recent edit
1828:the cited source
1826:And here's what
1766:
1758:
1667:Did you look at
1640:
1635:
1594:secondary source
1580:
1560:if appropriate.
1552:
1551:
1522:
1518:
1508:
1507:
1501:
1455:
1450:
1425:
1357:
1281:
1272:
1258:
1243:
1211:Twisted Colossus
1167:
1158:
1131:
1130:
1109:
1037:
1028:
1001:
1000:
979:
836:The Plain Dealer
529:
446:WikiProject Ohio
440:
435:
434:
433:
393:
392:
389:
386:
383:
335:
330:
329:
328:
319:
312:
311:
306:
303:
292:
285:
207:
206:
203:
200:
197:
176:
169:
168:
163:
160:
145:
138:
121:
115:
114:
113:
106:
86:
63:
46:
23:
16:
2083:
2082:
2078:
2077:
2076:
2074:
2073:
2072:
1973:
1972:
1940:174.207.163.110
1936:
1898:Manual of Style
1836:
1820:
1778:
1762:
1754:
1724:
1704:
1650:
1645:
1644:
1643:
1636:
1632:
1561:
1558:reliable source
1549:
1520:
1516:
1505:
1499:
1453:
1448:
1439:
1434:
1421:
1382:Steel Vengeance
1367:
1294:Steel Vengeance
1275:
1266:
1239:
1229:
1176:
1161:
1156:
1124:
1117:have permission
1107:
1061:this simple FaQ
1046:
1031:
1026:
994:
987:have permission
977:
951:this simple FaQ
936:
885:
625:may be included
523:
470:
436:
431:
429:
390:
387:
384:
381:
380:
379:
365:Become a Member
331:
326:
324:
304:
298:
273:High-importance
221:High-importance
204:
201:
198:
196:Amusement Parks
195:
194:
187:Amusement parks
162:Highâimportance
161:
158:Roller Coasters
151:
149:Amusement Parks
122:on Knowledge's
119:
82:
27:Steel Vengeance
12:
11:
5:
2081:
2079:
2071:
2070:
2065:
2060:
2055:
2050:
2045:
2040:
2035:
2030:
2025:
2020:
2015:
2010:
2005:
2000:
1995:
1990:
1985:
1975:
1974:
1971:
1970:
1935:
1932:
1917:
1916:
1915:
1914:
1913:
1912:
1888:
1887:
1886:
1885:
1871:
1864:
1863:
1840:
1839:
1838:
1834:
1824:
1823:
1822:
1818:
1777:
1774:
1773:
1772:
1737:F Producktions
1723:
1720:
1703:
1700:
1684:
1683:
1649:
1646:
1642:
1641:
1629:
1628:
1624:
1623:
1622:
1612:MitchellLunger
1608:
1585:
1584:
1529:
1528:
1509:
1498:
1495:
1494:
1493:
1477:
1476:
1438:
1435:
1433:
1432:
1418:requested move
1412:
1411:
1410:
1371:
1356:
1350:
1328:
1327:
1298:MitchellLunger
1287:
1251:
1250:
1236:requested move
1230:
1228:
1225:
1207:
1206:
1180:MitchellLunger
1175:
1174:Moving Article
1172:
1151:
1150:
1143:
1096:
1095:
1087:Added archive
1085:
1077:Added archive
1075:
1067:Added archive
1045:
1042:
1021:
1020:
1013:
966:
965:
957:Added archive
935:
932:
931:
930:
884:
881:
880:
879:
878:
877:
876:
875:
874:
873:
872:
871:
870:
869:
868:
867:
866:
865:
739:
731:
730:
729:
728:
727:
726:
725:
724:
692:
684:
683:
682:
681:
680:
679:
678:
677:
676:
675:
616:
608:
607:
606:
605:
604:
603:
573:
565:
564:
563:
562:
561:
560:
559:
558:
469:
466:
463:
462:
459:
458:
455:
454:
451:Low-importance
442:
441:
425:
415:
414:
407:Low-importance
403:
397:
396:
394:
378:
377:
372:
367:
362:
355:
353:Template Usage
349:
337:
336:
320:
308:
307:
305:Lowâimportance
293:
281:
280:
277:
276:
263:
253:
252:
249:Mid-importance
239:
229:
228:
217:
211:
210:
208:
191:the discussion
177:
165:
164:
146:
134:
133:
127:
116:
102:
101:
98:
97:
94:
87:
79:
78:
75:
72:
68:
67:
59:
58:
24:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2080:
2069:
2066:
2064:
2061:
2059:
2056:
2054:
2051:
2049:
2046:
2044:
2041:
2039:
2036:
2034:
2031:
2029:
2026:
2024:
2021:
2019:
2016:
2014:
2011:
2009:
2006:
2004:
2001:
1999:
1996:
1994:
1991:
1989:
1986:
1984:
1981:
1980:
1978:
1969:
1965:
1961:
1957:
1952:
1951:
1950:
1949:
1945:
1941:
1933:
1931:
1930:
1926:
1922:
1921:SummeRStorM79
1911:
1907:
1903:
1899:
1894:
1893:
1892:
1891:
1890:
1889:
1884:
1880:
1876:
1875:SummeRStorM79
1872:
1868:
1867:
1866:
1865:
1862:
1858:
1854:
1850:
1846:
1841:
1832:
1831:
1829:
1825:
1816:
1815:
1813:
1812:SummeRStorM79
1810:
1809:
1808:
1807:
1803:
1799:
1798:SummeRStorM79
1793:
1792:
1788:
1784:
1783:SummeRStorM79
1775:
1771:
1767:
1765:
1759:
1757:
1749:
1748:
1747:
1746:
1742:
1738:
1733:
1730:
1727:
1721:
1719:
1718:
1714:
1710:
1709:SummeRStorM79
1701:
1699:
1698:
1694:
1690:
1689:SummeRStorM79
1682:
1678:
1674:
1670:
1666:
1665:
1664:
1663:
1659:
1655:
1647:
1639:
1634:
1631:
1627:
1621:
1617:
1613:
1609:
1607:
1603:
1599:
1595:
1591:
1587:
1586:
1583:
1578:
1577:
1572:
1571:
1566:
1565:
1559:
1555:
1547:
1546:
1545:
1544:
1540:
1536:
1526:
1523:parameter to
1514:
1510:
1503:
1502:
1496:
1492:
1488:
1484:
1479:
1478:
1475:
1471:
1467:
1462:
1461:
1460:
1459:
1456:
1451:
1444:
1436:
1431:
1429:
1424:
1419:
1414:
1413:
1409:
1405:
1401:
1400:165.91.12.221
1397:
1393:
1392:
1387:
1383:
1379:
1375:
1372:
1370:
1364:
1360:
1354:
1351:
1349:
1345:
1341:
1340:59.149.124.29
1337:
1333:
1330:
1329:
1326:
1322:
1318:
1317:In ictu oculi
1314:
1310:
1309:
1308:
1307:
1303:
1299:
1295:
1291:
1286:
1285:
1282:
1280:
1279:
1273:
1271:
1270:
1262:
1256:
1249:
1247:
1242:
1237:
1232:
1231:
1226:
1224:
1223:
1220:
1216:
1212:
1205:
1201:
1197:
1192:
1191:
1190:
1189:
1185:
1181:
1173:
1171:
1170:
1165:
1160:
1159:
1148:
1144:
1141:
1137:
1136:
1135:
1128:
1122:
1118:
1114:
1110:
1104:
1099:
1094:
1090:
1086:
1084:
1080:
1076:
1074:
1070:
1066:
1065:
1064:
1062:
1058:
1054:
1049:
1043:
1041:
1040:
1035:
1030:
1029:
1018:
1014:
1011:
1007:
1006:
1005:
998:
992:
988:
984:
980:
974:
969:
964:
960:
956:
955:
954:
952:
948:
944:
939:
933:
929:
925:
921:
916:
915:
914:
912:
908:
904:
900:
896:
888:
882:
864:
860:
856:
851:
850:
849:
845:
841:
837:
833:
828:
827:
826:
822:
818:
813:
812:
811:
807:
803:
798:
797:
796:
792:
788:
783:
779:
775:
774:
773:
769:
765:
760:
759:
758:
754:
750:
745:
740:
738:
735:
734:
733:
732:
723:
719:
715:
711:
710:
709:
705:
701:
697:
696:
693:
691:
688:
687:
686:
685:
674:
670:
666:
661:
660:
659:
655:
651:
647:
643:
642:
641:
637:
633:
629:
628:
626:
621:
617:
615:
612:
611:
610:
609:
602:
598:
594:
590:
589:
586:
582:
578:
574:
572:
569:
568:
567:
566:
557:
553:
549:
544:
543:
542:
538:
534:
527:
522:
521:
519:
516:
515:
514:
510:
506:
502:
497:
496:
495:
494:
490:
486:
482:
478:
474:
467:
452:
449:(assessed as
448:
447:
439:
428:
421:
417:
416:
412:
408:
402:
399:
398:
395:
382:United States
376:
373:
371:
368:
366:
363:
361:
360:
356:
354:
351:
350:
347:
343:
342:
334:
323:
321:
318:
314:
313:
309:
302:
297:
296:United States
294:
291:
287:
274:
271:(assessed as
270:
269:
259:
255:
254:
250:
247:(assessed as
246:
245:
235:
231:
230:
226:
222:
216:
213:
212:
209:
192:
188:
184:
183:
178:
175:
171:
170:
166:
159:
155:
150:
147:
144:
140:
135:
131:
125:
117:
108:
107:
95:
93:
92:
88:
85:
81:
80:
76:
73:
70:
69:
64:
60:
55:
53:
52:
44:
40:
36:
35:
34:
28:
25:
22:
18:
17:
1937:
1934:Kept records
1918:
1794:
1779:
1763:
1755:
1734:
1731:
1728:
1725:
1705:
1685:
1651:
1633:
1625:
1575:
1569:
1563:
1553:
1535:KingShuffler
1532:
1524:
1513:edit request
1440:
1422:
1415:
1389:
1373:
1352:
1331:
1288:
1277:
1276:
1268:
1267:
1254:
1252:
1240:
1233:
1215:my talk page
1208:
1177:
1155:
1152:
1127:source check
1106:
1100:
1097:
1050:
1047:
1025:
1022:
997:source check
976:
970:
967:
940:
937:
893:â Preceding
889:
886:
835:
832:Toledo Blade
831:
743:
624:
585:cited source
471:
444:
406:
370:Project Talk
358:
339:
266:
242:
220:
180:
130:WikiProjects
89:
49:
47:
43:please do so
31:
30:
26:
1590:RCDB source
1428:move review
1246:move review
1053:Mean Streak
943:Mean Streak
473:DisneyFan22
438:Ohio portal
1977:Categories
1726:Hi there,
1669:the source
1626:References
1517:|answered=
1443:WP:NOTNEWS
1396:Banana Joe
1388:, a minor
1164:Report bug
1034:Report bug
620:WP:CRYSTAL
154:Cedar Fair
37:under the
1702:Vandalism
1654:Sipriceaz
1554:Not done:
1449:Hawkeye75
1219:Ian Manka
1147:this tool
1140:this tool
1017:this tool
1010:this tool
581:newsblogs
1960:GoneIn60
1902:GoneIn60
1853:GoneIn60
1830:states:
1751:correct.
1673:GoneIn60
1598:GoneIn60
1483:GoneIn60
1466:GoneIn60
1196:GoneIn60
1153:Cheers.â
1023:Cheers.â
920:GoneIn60
907:contribs
895:unsigned
840:GoneIn60
802:GoneIn60
749:GoneIn60
650:GoneIn60
577:WP:BLOGS
548:GoneIn60
526:GoneIn60
485:GoneIn60
120:GA-class
51:reassess
1776:CHESS!!
1756:JlACEer
1374:Support
1359:ZXCVBNM
1353:Support
1332:Support
1278:Warrior
1057:my edit
947:my edit
887:Hello,
855:Varnent
817:Varnent
787:Varnent
764:Varnent
744:opinion
714:Varnent
700:Varnent
665:Varnent
632:Varnent
593:Varnent
533:Varnent
518:Varnent
505:Varnent
409:on the
223:on the
74:Process
1870:agree.
1454:(talk)
1313:merged
782:Mantis
375:Alerts
126:scale.
96:Listed
77:Result
1564:L293D
1521:|ans=
1511:This
1255:moved
481:diff2
477:diff1
1964:talk
1944:talk
1925:talk
1906:talk
1879:talk
1857:talk
1802:talk
1787:talk
1764:talk
1741:talk
1713:talk
1693:talk
1677:talk
1658:talk
1616:talk
1602:talk
1539:talk
1487:talk
1470:talk
1404:talk
1363:TALK
1344:talk
1321:talk
1302:talk
1200:talk
1184:talk
924:talk
903:talk
859:talk
844:talk
834:and
821:talk
806:talk
791:talk
768:talk
753:talk
718:talk
704:talk
669:talk
654:talk
646:WP:N
636:talk
597:talk
552:talk
537:talk
509:talk
489:talk
301:Ohio
215:High
71:Date
1519:or
1420:.
1269:Sky
1121:RfC
1091:to
1081:to
1071:to
991:RfC
961:to
401:Low
1979::
1966:)
1946:)
1927:)
1908:)
1881:)
1859:)
1804:)
1789:)
1768:)
1743:)
1715:)
1695:)
1679:)
1660:)
1618:)
1604:)
1573:â˘
1541:)
1525:no
1489:)
1481:--
1472:)
1406:)
1398:.
1346:)
1323:)
1304:)
1292:â
1257:.
1238:.
1217:.
1202:)
1186:)
1134:.
1129:}}
1125:{{
1004:.
999:}}
995:{{
926:)
909:)
905:â˘
861:)
846:)
823:)
808:)
793:)
770:)
755:)
720:)
706:)
671:)
656:)
638:)
599:)
554:)
539:)
511:)
491:)
453:).
299::
275:).
251:).
156:/
152::
54:it
45:.
1962:(
1942:(
1923:(
1904:(
1877:(
1855:(
1843:"
1800:(
1785:(
1760:(
1753:â
1739:(
1711:(
1691:(
1675:(
1656:(
1614:(
1600:(
1579:)
1576:â
1570:â
1567:(
1537:(
1485:(
1468:(
1402:(
1365:)
1361:(
1342:(
1319:(
1300:(
1263:)
1259:(
1198:(
1182:(
1166:)
1162:(
1149:.
1142:.
1036:)
1032:(
1019:.
1012:.
922:(
901:(
857:(
842:(
819:(
804:(
789:(
766:(
751:(
716:(
702:(
667:(
652:(
634:(
595:(
550:(
535:(
528::
524:@
507:(
487:(
413:.
227:.
132::
56:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.