418:
Rubinstein preferred the
Hamburg-built Steinway model D-274. Sergei Rachmaninoff owned two New York models in his Beverly Hills home and one New York model D-274 in his New York home; however, he chose a Hamburg model D-274 for his Villa Senar in Switzerland. " don't appear to be verifiable through ref 116. Ref 116 seems to state (several times) only that Rachmaninoff had a Steinway at Villa Senar near Lucerne.
825:
616:
804:
787:
759:
734:
711:
699:
678:
580:
269:
be) the world's largest ...."; or even better that "the system at the time of its installation was claimed (or stated to be) the world's largest ...". The statement as it currently stands is not supported by a
Reliable Source and there is no evidence that four years later it is still the worlds largest system. Note: Ref 91, makes it clear the Steinway & Sons claim to have ..... .
661:
648:
42:
417:
As far as I, can tell the claims: "Some great pianists of the past and some active pianists today have expressed a preference for
Steinway pianos produced at Steinway's factory in New York City or at Steinway's factory in Hamburg. Vladimir Horowitz played a New York-built Steinway model D-274; Arthur
268:
The statement: "On
January 24, 2009, Steinway installed the world's largest solar-powered rooftop air-conditioning and dehumidification system, at a cost of $ 875,000, to dehumidify the factory in New York City, and protect the pianos." aught to make it clear that "the system is claimed (or stated to
291:
Ref 96 is a raw web link with the title "Yoko Ono's official YouTube page", perhaps it is but opens "John Lennon: Imagine Peace". I've not seen any statement that it is "Yoko Ono's official YouTube page". The site is being used to verify "The piano can be seen in the 1971 film footage that features
508:
Possibly just about compliant in respect of introducing the topic (one half of its role), but its rather "thin" for an article of this length. In particular if says nothing about the "piano bank", affiliates, the sale of the company by the family. I would consider these to be "important", based on
198:. This is likely to take another day or so (perhaps two). At this stage I'm mostly working on negative reporting, i.e. I'll mostly be mentioning "problems", so if I don't find any there would be much to say here.
186:
I've now had a quick read of this article and my initial impression is that this article is GA-class, possibly somewhere between GA and FA, but I've not yet done the review or checked any of the citations.
516:
The statement in the first sentence: "and subcontracted pianos from suppliers sold under secondary names" is vague and unclear. This information is then repeated, and expanded upon in the final paragraph.
280:. The latter should be used and be properly cited. It's also a 62 page report with almost the same number of pages again in the appendices (F-pages), so a page number or numbers should be given.
509:
the relative proportion of text devoted to these topics, in the body of the article, so I have concerns as to whether the Lead accurately summarise the main points of the article, as per
546:
47:
80:
70:
610:
126:
122:
52:
107:
554:
99:
781:
75:
672:
213:
Update: In the light of numerous raw web links used a citations, I'm revising this down to somewhere between C-class and B-class.
265:
In paragraph five, a citation aught to be provided for the claim": "By the year 2000, Steinway had made its 550,000th piano".
242:
Refs 52, 53, 54, 55, which are web links have titles but not publishers (OK its
Steinway & Sons, but it should be given).
543:
156:
590:
277:
634:
753:
115:
17:
773:
642:
598:
558:
438:
Refs 167, 168, 169, 170, 171, 172, 173 and 174 are raw web links, they should be properly cited.
92:
846:
666:
Mostly well referenced, but some sections are unreferenced and some references need attention.
653:
Mostly well referenced, but some sections are unreferenced and some references need attention.
527:
405:
308:
218:
203:
171:
150:
724:
594:
510:
497:
195:
831:
798:
606:
602:
421:
Refs 123, 128, 129, 130, 131, 141 and 142 are raw web links, they should be properly cited.
292:
John Lennon performing
Imagine", so "John Lennon: Imagine Peace" is a more relevant title.
239:
Ref 44 (Forgotten New York) has a broken link it leads to a "Page Not found" message.
842:
834:
once the problems above are addressed. The article itself is close to being a "GA".
523:
401:
304:
214:
199:
167:
146:
276:. The report I assume that is being used as verification is on the USA's SEC site
190:
I'm now going to work my way through the article section by section, starting at
850:
531:
409:
312:
222:
207:
175:
160:
288:
Refs 92, 93, 94 & 95 are raw web links. They should be properly cited.
295:
Refs 98, 99 & 100 are raw web links they should be properly cited.
545:
see here) and two main contributors are both banned as sock puppets (
489:
Refs 209 and 210 are raw web links, they should be properly cited.
194:
section and working to the end, and then going back to review the
273:
797:
B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with
549:). I'm therefore closing this review after nine days "Hold".
780:
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have
542:
The nominator has been inactive since since 31 May 2012 (
134:
103:
347:
See Ref 113 - that is exactly how it should be done.
283:
See Ref 113 - that is exactly how it should be done.
344:, particularly the bit about citing page numbers).
272:Reg 6 is a raw web link that goes to a search page
658:B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
337:Ref 5 is a broken web link - gives a 404 error.
522:At this point I'm putting the review On Hold.
8:
30:
400:....Stopping for now. To be continued.
303:....Stopping for now. To be continued.
61:
33:
7:
830:The article can be renominated at
731:Fair representation without bias:
660:
647:
24:
823:
802:
785:
757:
732:
709:
697:
676:
659:
646:
614:
578:
1:
340:Ref 6 (see comments above in
824:
803:
786:
758:
733:
710:
698:
677:
615:
579:
866:
564:
851:19:23, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
777:to illustrate the topic?
621:The Lead needs more work.
532:17:10, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
410:08:38, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
313:08:02, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
223:07:07, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
208:22:26, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
176:15:10, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
161:15:10, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
566:A comprehensive article
18:Talk:Steinway & Sons
572:reasonably well written
691:broad in its coverage
643:References to sources
673:No original research
472:Mostly unreferenced.
782:fair use rationales
696:A. Major aspects:
630:factually accurate
577:A. Prose quality:
809:Well illustrated.
799:suitable captions
792:Well illustrated.
480:Documentary films
89:
88:
857:
827:
826:
806:
805:
789:
788:
761:
760:
736:
735:
713:
712:
701:
700:
680:
679:
663:
662:
650:
649:
618:
617:
582:
581:
182:Initial comments
139:
130:
111:
43:Copyvio detector
31:
865:
864:
860:
859:
858:
856:
855:
854:
593:compliance for
539:
537:Overall summary
184:
166:I will review.
120:
97:
91:
85:
57:
29:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
863:
861:
840:
839:
838:
837:
836:
835:
822:Pass or Fail:
814:
813:
812:
811:
810:
795:
794:
793:
768:
767:
766:
765:
764:
743:
742:
741:
740:
739:
720:
719:
718:
717:
716:
706:
705:
704:
687:
686:
685:
684:
683:
669:
668:
667:
656:
655:
654:
626:
625:
624:
623:
622:
603:words to watch
587:
586:
585:
551:
550:
538:
535:
520:
519:
518:
517:
514:
503:
502:
493:
492:
491:
490:
484:
483:
476:
475:
474:
473:
467:
466:
459:
458:
457:
456:
450:
449:
442:
441:
440:
439:
433:
432:
425:
424:
423:
422:
419:
398:
397:
390:
389:
388:
387:
381:
380:
373:
372:
371:
370:
364:
363:
356:
355:
354:
353:
350:
349:
348:
342:Recent history
338:
332:
331:
324:
323:
322:
321:
301:
300:
299:
298:
297:
296:
293:
289:
286:
285:
284:
270:
266:
258:
257:
256:
255:
252:Recent history
246:
245:
244:
243:
240:
234:
233:
226:
225:
183:
180:
179:
178:
140:
87:
86:
84:
83:
78:
73:
67:
64:
63:
59:
58:
56:
55:
53:External links
50:
45:
39:
36:
35:
28:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
862:
853:
852:
848:
844:
833:
829:
828:
821:
820:
818:
815:
808:
807:
800:
796:
791:
790:
783:
779:
778:
776:
775:
769:
763:
762:
755:
751:
750:
748:
744:
738:
737:
730:
729:
727:
726:
721:
715:
714:
707:
703:
702:
695:
694:
692:
688:
682:
681:
674:
670:
665:
664:
657:
652:
651:
644:
640:
639:
637:
636:
631:
627:
620:
619:
612:
608:
604:
600:
596:
592:
588:
584:
583:
576:
575:
573:
569:
568:
567:
563:
562:
560:
557:review – see
556:
548:
544:
541:
540:
536:
534:
533:
529:
525:
515:
512:
507:
506:
505:
504:
500:
499:
495:
494:
488:
487:
486:
485:
481:
478:
477:
471:
470:
469:
468:
464:
461:
460:
454:
453:
452:
451:
447:
446:Price records
444:
443:
437:
436:
435:
434:
430:
427:
426:
420:
416:
415:
414:
413:
412:
411:
407:
403:
395:
392:
391:
385:
384:
383:
382:
378:
375:
374:
368:
367:
366:
365:
361:
358:
357:
352:Otherwise OK.
351:
346:
345:
343:
339:
336:
335:
334:
333:
329:
326:
325:
320:Otherwise OK.
319:
318:
317:
316:
315:
314:
310:
306:
294:
290:
287:
282:
281:
279:
275:
271:
267:
264:
263:
262:
261:
260:
259:
253:
250:
249:
248:
247:
241:
238:
237:
236:
235:
231:
228:
227:
224:
220:
216:
212:
211:
210:
209:
205:
201:
197:
193:
188:
181:
177:
173:
169:
165:
164:
163:
162:
158:
155:
152:
148:
145:
141:
138:
137:
133:
128:
124:
119:
118:
114:
109:
105:
101:
96:
95:
82:
79:
77:
74:
72:
69:
68:
66:
65:
60:
54:
51:
49:
46:
44:
41:
40:
38:
37:
32:
26:
19:
841:
816:
771:
746:
723:
708:B. Focused:
690:
633:
629:
571:
565:
561:for criteria
553:
552:
521:
496:
479:
462:
445:
428:
399:
393:
377:"Piano bank"
376:
360:Piano brands
359:
341:
328:Piano models
327:
302:
251:
229:
191:
189:
185:
153:
143:
142:
135:
131:
117:Article talk
116:
112:
93:
90:
81:Instructions
394:Manufacture
104:visual edit
635:verifiable
429:Affiliates
48:Authorship
34:GA toolbox
754:edit wars
455:Looks OK.
386:Looks OK.
369:Looks OK.
144:Reviewer:
71:Templates
62:Reviewing
27:GA Review
772:contain
770:Does it
559:WP:WIAGA
547:see here
157:contribs
76:Criteria
843:Pyrotec
817:Overall
756:, etc:
725:neutral
607:fiction
524:Pyrotec
511:WP:Lead
498:WP:Lead
402:Pyrotec
305:Pyrotec
230:History
215:Pyrotec
200:Pyrotec
196:WP:Lead
192:History
168:Pyrotec
147:Pyrotec
127:history
108:history
94:Article
832:WP:GAN
774:images
747:stable
745:Is it
722:Is it
689:Is it
628:Is it
609:, and
599:layout
570:Is it
463:Awards
611:lists
136:Watch
16:<
847:talk
632:and
595:lead
528:talk
406:talk
309:talk
278:here
274:here
219:talk
204:talk
172:talk
151:talk
123:edit
100:edit
752:No
671:C.
641:A.
591:MoS
589:B.
849:)
819::
801::
784::
749:?
728:?
693:?
675::
645::
638:?
613::
605:,
601:,
597:,
574:?
555:GA
530:)
408:)
311:)
221:)
206:)
174:)
159:)
125:|
106:|
102:|
845:(
526:(
513:.
501:-
482:-
465:-
448:-
431:-
404:(
396:-
379:-
362:-
330:-
307:(
254:-
232:-
217:(
202:(
170:(
154:·
149:(
132:·
129:)
121:(
113:·
110:)
98:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.