Talk:Stephen Colbert/Archive 3

1891:"However, COLBERT is also found in Southern Ireland in the 1400s, long before the Huguenot era. It is possible, that these families came from either England, France or Scotland. The COLBERT surname is well known in South Munster. This name is said to have come to Ireland from England. " I would suggest, therefore, that the text be modified to make it clear that, while Colbert's name is in fact (no joke) French, even though his family may be essentially Irish in origin. In any event, does anyone in fact know his family tree? Or could this be yet another Colbert joke about his past? It wouldn't be the first time a French name has been anglicized in the US, and I wouldn't put it past Colbert to make a joke about that. (I'm sure a fan can tell cite the episode where he insisted, to a Mexican-American guest, that he was not an immigrant French-Canadian but a "French-Frenchian") 803:

thru various Wiki pages. Why? Because they're the oldest fan sites on the 'net, and they contribute radically different things. NoFactZone has become the most reliable source on the 'net for general information about Colbert, both character and person, as well as information related to the show. Colbert's Heroes is slowly turning into a FAQ source, as well as a growing archive of first hand reports on episode tapings. These two things alone elevate them above a typical, "I'm going to make a fan page about someone I have a celebrity crush on, look at my sparkling Geocities HTML!" page, and actually turn them into valuable resources.

3601:

Without that, it's original research: you can't just assume that the real Colbert believes the exact opposite of everything that comes out of his character's mouth. For example, there was a segment on recently with Debra Dickerson, who claimed that while Barack Obama is African American, he's not black because he doesn't share the same background as most African Americans. Colbert-the-character took her to task on this point in the usual satirical way, but the overall impression I got from the interview was that Colbert the actor agreed with his character on the point, but for different reasons.

2905:. Even if there's a case to be made for there being some connection between the site and the Colbert Report, the exact relationship remains a mystery -- there's been no official word about this one way or another, and press sources have completely ignored it. Per WP:RS Knowledge doesn't engage in original research and per WP:NOT, Knowledge does not break news. If the site is really Colbert's magnum opus, it will be reported by someone eventually. It doesn't hurt the article to wait until then. 785:

blog. The admin there spend upwards of two hours daily updating the site so it refelects the latest news/knowledge. I would certainly cite this site as the definitive repository of Colbert knowledge outside of Knowledge. ColbertHeroes is a repository of published articles, the FAQ end of the equation, and again the admin spends much time ensuring that the information contained therein is up to date. Colbert Nation, however, is blog about the show primarily and is more appropriately added to

453:

effect requiring severe measures. Yes, it's a nuissance to review all the edits made to the page and revert routinely but that's the case for many articles. It's actions like protecting this article that lead to cries of "omg colbert broke wikipedia lol elephants" and encourage people to continue vandalizing since they think it actually has an impact. But if it's troubling lots of editors I can see why it would be necessary to protect so I'm not vehemently opposed to that option either. --

1088:: "One difficulty in writing about Colbert is that when you point out things like the fact that he’s a huge Lord of the Rings nerd and has, on his desk, a heavy picture book titled A Tolkien Bestiary, roughly half the readers will think, Hmmm, interesting, while the other half will think, Yes! Yes! Of course! Colbert’s a Tolkien nut! because they worship Stephen Tyrone Colbert and know everything about him.". Also, keep in mind that his family's heritage is reported to be Irish, and 1057:, at one point it sounds as though he's referring to himself with a middle name other than "Tyrone". Unfortuately, it's hard to make out, but there's definitely something he says between "Stephen" and "Colbert", possibly beginning with a "K" sound... anyone have a better idea of what he may have been saying? Also, I sort of feel silly mentioning it at this point, since Tyrone has been in the article for so long, but what exactly was our source for "Tyrone", again? 31: 1320:. I suppose what I'm saying is we may not be able to call those segments "memorable" at all. As much as enjoyed the Prince Charles report, the fact that Colbert screwed up on camera and a lot of fans got a kick out of it is probably not encyclopedic, unless someone else has commented on it in a reliable source. I know that text has been in the article for a long time, but verifiability is policy, so it may have to go. 1567:

we didn't have references for. I expanded the SWC section to include something about the critical response, although I might reword that a bit later, and nixed some of the "other roles" content that seemed irrelevant or very minor; also I added info to the early career section, which could still afford to be fleshed out a bit, I think. Fairly hefty changes, but I'm hoping to bring this up to A or FA-class eventually.

858:, the adjunct message board associated with the Colbert Nation satellite official site. The Colboard is primarily a fan driven message board and with 10,000 members and approaching a quarter of a million posts could probably qualify for its own external link. Recently, Comedy Central opened an "official message board". Whether the latter should be separately identified in addition I leave up to the senior editors. 3039:

they're both Democratic. The Colbert Report and Steven's lines are written to be extremely Republican to expose the bad parts of that way of thought, whereas the Daily Show staff makes it straightforward liberal. In a nutshell: The Colbert Report is reverse psycology. How this ties in with the O'Reilly thing is that Steven was agreeing with him to expose him as an @$ $ hole, or so I strongly believe.

1449:"The emphasis his family placed on intelligence as a desirable trait would lead Colbert to lose his Southern accent when he was still quite young." In addition to being slightly inflammatory, the two points the line makes (His family's emphasis on Intelligence and Colbert's lack of a Southern accent) are made by both the preceding and proceeding lines. There is no need for this line. 1468:. However, I would strongly encourage the editors look into some of the "redundant cites". For non-controversial details like what the Colbert Report is a parody of and his family life there does not need to be more then a single cite per claim. It can give the appearance of "footnote" clutter and should be trimmed down to which cite provides the best reference support. 587:, have never been involved in editing this or any other Knowledge article. Knowledge guidelines discourage that, as Man In Bl♟ck points out. Just because you do not "recognize" the editors who try to follow those guidelines does not mean that their contributions are vandalism. Knowledge isn't the private stomping ground of a few self-appointed arbiters...is it? 3230:

Gaining Money, Colbert, And an oshawa generals fan looking for a little payback for the Pants (ps, he does look good in red and white), I tried to post a change. However I could not, as such, I will keep checking so that I may attempt to win the 5$ . I posted to the Colbert definition in Knowledge, however I'm not sure that reality was mentioned there either.

583:, which I genuinely believe is authored by Colbert and/or his writers and is a Comedy Central/Comedy Partners site, the quirky, red-headed bastard stepsister of colbertnation.com. I do not own the site, I have no personal interest in promoting it other than I find it interesting and relevant to the subject. The powers that be at tekjansen.com, 1743:

reviewing article in the current state. With that being said, I believe it's ready to be relisted as GA-status, I just want one more uninvolved editor to verify (since I did some of the cleanup myself). This means anyone, not a specific GA-reviewer. I just loves me some consensus and want to avoid any appearance of impropriety. ;-) /

2214:

reliable source as-is, at least by Knowledge's standards, so any additional research would just be for peace of mind. If you do want to email his publicist and find something out, I suppose it would be OK to help make an informed decision as to which source we went with -- we just couldn't use the email itself as a source. --

4118:"Since its debut the series has been successful, earning Colbert four Emmy nominations and an invitation to perform as featured entertainer at the White House Correspondents' Association Dinner in its first year (2006), in addition to establishing itself as one of Comedy Central's highest rated series." 4353:

I think in the "See Also" section, there should be a link to the "Stephen Colbert (character)" page, which I didn't know exhisted until I found it through another page. At the same time the "(character)" page could use a link back to the original Colbert page in its "See Also" section (thought that's

3014:

If Colbert said that about Stewart's audience, it obviously was a joke. He was commenting during the O'Reilly "interview" about Stewart being a pothead and such (not those exact words). Obviously, all a joke. People make the assumption that O'Reilly is serious all the time. Like when he has this body

2857:

The fact that the site claims (vaguely) to be copyrighted by Comedy Central is no different from it claiming (vaguely) to be run by Colbert. No matter what they say or imply, no source officially connected to Stephen Colbert or Comedy Central has ever acknowledged the site, nor is there any reliable

2819:

That's been there for a while. The placement is suggestive of a copyright notice, but neither the word "copyright" nor the copyright symbol appear at all. The full (hidden) text is "2005 2006 Comedy Partners Rights Reserved". It's interesting, but it doesn’t prove anything, since anyone could just as

2139:

Hi, newbie here - under TDS, it says that Colbert won 4 Emmys, whereas under TCR it says that his "only Emmy" came in 2006. Can someone please investigate and clarify? As for where Colbert was born, the Northwestern alumni magazine reporter asked Colbert where he was born and that's where that comes

1861:

My dad always wanted to be Col-BEAR ... so (he) said to us, 'You can be anything you want.' And so we made a choice, and it's about half and half. The girls for the most part are like, 'Get over it, you're Colbert,' but I was so young when this choice was given to us, I think that if somebody woke me

1699:

Actually, looking this over, there are a couple of changes here I'm not so sure about. I like the added info about awards and recognition for the Colbert report, but the bit about "joint-custody" of the Emmy seems like trivia to me. Also, while I like the inception/recognition structure, I'm not sure

824:

Yes, Colbert Nation is the "official" fan site... as official as anything else Comedy Central runs. It's not a fan site, and shouldn't be listed as or considered one except in the same sly tongue-in-cheek manner as the show itself does. Colbert Nation is a fan forum maintained by Comedy Central, just

394:

I just always thought vandalism was the cost of Knowledge living up to the "anyone can edit" slogan, but looking at the semi-protected category I guess I'm in the minority these days. Judging by the category, getting vandalized 4 times in one day warrants semi-protection now, which means this article

179:

Colbert is not a Hungarian citizen -- Colbert was joking and Simonyi was playing along. And the naming committee has announced they're calling it the 'Megyeri hid', all rumors aside. Although I'm beginning wonder how long people will continue to believe Colbert swindled his way into getting a foreign

2294:

In the Colbert Report section it says that "In May 2006, the New Yorker magazine listed Colbert (along with Jon Stewart of the Daily Show) as one of its top dozen influential persons in media." I was surprised to see the New Yorker had such lists. Foot note 39 says "^ The New Yorker Magazine's Most

2169:

I don't have the specific date Colbert was married, but it would have been sometime between 1990 and 1995, if that helps you. His wife was a native of Charleston who grew up a few blocks away from him, but they didn't really know each other until they met again in 1989 while Colbert was visiting his

1659:

I would like to assist in cleaning up this article and getting it to GA-class, however I'm unsure if a GA reviewer can (ethically) actively edit the article... that would violate my ability to objectively evaluate the article. I will do some digging and find out what rules apply. If worse comes to

1566:

Hopefully the concerns above are mostly addressed now. I've expanded the lead, prose-ified the other roles section, removed some of the fair-use images, and cleaned up or partially re-written number of sections. In the process, I added some references, juggled others, and pulled out a few statements

1198:

There's a section under "The Daily Show" heading where it states some of the memorable moments of "This Week in God" include a installment in which Stephen cracks up while discussing a Prince Charles scandal, when, in fact, the aforementioned discussion was not part of the "This Week in God" series.

867:

The Colboard is relevant, but unfortuately, I believe WP:EL doesn't permit linking to message boards. It's fine to link to a site that has message boards and other acceptable content, but not forums themselves. The link to Colbert Nation should cover it anyway, since the Colboard is part of Colbert

245:

and other policies), you can present them here or put them in the article right away. Were you thinking of the Geraldo/O'Reilly comments? The reason most people avoid criticizing him (and so why there isn't much criticism to include) is because his character and show are largely a joke, an elaborate

4357:

I realize there's a link under the "The Colbert Report" section, but its poorly labeled "in character". This should be rewritten, in addition to the link being added in the "See Also" section, so if you're looking for the link, it's obvious in that section and you don't have to go searching through

3283:

Shouldn't something be mentioned about stephen colbert day? After the Saginaw Spirit beat the Oshawa generals? Also, don't forget the Saginaw Spirit named their mascot after him, 'Stephen Cobeagle the Eagle", AND got saginaw fans to throw General Motors quarter reports on the ice at the game he won

3052:

In the January 24, 2007 episode, Colbert referred to Knowledge in "The Word" section of his show by displaying "Knowledge" as subtext for his statement that he could create a fact by posting something on a blog, having another blog link to it, and then validating that blog's reporting of the "fact"

1644:

All in all, I really like the article. However, it seems as if there is too big of a rush to get this article a GA banner. The grammatical problems are a show stopper. I'm changing the nomination status on hold, but without some serious attention I think this it is still soon to approve. By all

1551:

I want to thank the editors for their hardwork and dedication to getting the article up this point. This article has a lot of positive merit and I, again, encourage the editors to continue improving the article and eventually resubmit it for GA consideration. If you have any questions, feel free to

1386:

Well, fine. You do have a point. I wish it could sound more interesting though. I mean, the reason I checked those videos out on Youtube was because this very article said they were "Memorable" and that means they are worth watching, and it made me want to see them. If it just says they are "other"

1335:

But having those examples gives insight into why Stephen's so appreciated. Lot's of articles here talk about specific things people have done, just to kind of give an example of what they do. Stephen Colbert is known for being funny and making us laugh, the "memorable reports" are specific examples

1105:

Thanks. I'm not really trying to pull that name from the aticle -- it's clearly documented enough that it can be here -- but I'm curious. The name has been in the article forever, but New York Magazine article is the only serious article I've seen to include this detail, and it's quite recent. (The

802:

The only reason the editors added them back before anyone else is because the editors are two of the more active people maintaining both the Colbert information on Knowledge, as well as their external sites. If they hadn't added themselves back in, I would have when I got around to my monthly trawl

769:

Hmm. Respectfully, I'm not sure I understand your strong aversion to the links, Man in Black. Fansites can be a touchy subject, but WP:EL does seem to state that having a representative fansite link is okay, and the way this has been widely interpreted across Knowledge seems to support the the idea

647:

allows for including a link to one major fansite on articles about topics with many fansites, and these days it seems Colbert has enough on an internet-fan presence to qualify for that clause. My opinion is that NoFactZone and Colbert's Heroes are both relevant and informative enough to be included

333:

Knowledge seriously needs to unlock the Stephen Colbert cite, everyone knows that WP is a frickin joke. And without Colbert in the first place, WP wouldn't be getting so much traffic and ad revenue, so why not let him have some fun and lighten up a bit. It's a frickin' website, not the end of the

3600:

It's not entirely clear where the real Colbert stands on Knowledge. On the show, he's an actor reading a script. Granted, he's one of the writers of said script, but that still doesn't make him a critic. If you can cite some out of character criticism from Colbert than it might be appropriate.

2890:

The first cartoon was about Abraxxia. The novel at the site features a chapter about Abbraxia, which was published months before the cartoon aired. There is a Comedy Partners copyright notice on the front page of the site. There are Comedy Central ads all over the site, including video ads with

2688:

There are 4 different citations (3-6) in the main article supporting the fact that he comes from a Catholic family and is a practicing Catholic. If these are incorrectly cited, then that is something that needs to be fixed. Being able to step back and poke fun at something one believes in is not

2321:

I'm a graphic designer and have picked up on the fact that the main photo of Stephen Colbert is doctored, proof of this is the jagged edge around his face, the plain non-shadowed skin-tone on his face, the lack of shine on the left side of his face where the sun is coming down, the single-coloured

2213:

I believe that would still qualify as original research. The author of the article actually already offered to look through his notes and see if he can come up with the exact quote, but we couldn't really use that since it's not a part of his published article. Again, the NW article is a perfectly

1169:

Wikiality should be mentioned since it and Truthiness, which were both coined by Colbert, were nominated for words of the year. If the article mentions truthiness, then Wikiality should also be mentioned. And the wikiality site should be mentioned because Colbert included the web address on last

632:

There are now a substantial number of fan sites, and these two are the only ones that are neither primarily commercial nor plagiarized from other sources (Knowledge, IMDB, etc.) Do as you like; we have been re-submitting our sites since we believed we were victims of vandalism. The deleters were

3038:

It's really incredible how few people actualy understand what Steven Colbert and his writers run the show like. Look: The Daily Show with Jon Stewart is obviously intended for a Democratic audience, and at first glance the Colbert Resport might seem as its Republican counter-part, but in reality,

2351:

regarding another users' claim of taking and releasing the photograph for use. Personally, I think it is a decent, candid photograph of the subject. I don't think a retouched photo (removing redeye, etc.) is that big of a deal in any case. I'm inclined to disagree with this assessment; I think

2279:

Can I get a citation for this, appearing on the first line? "Stephen Tyrone Colbert is a child panty sniffer ". I'm willing to give some benefit of doubt in that he may have jokingly described himself as such on his show or in an interview, though if I were a gambling man, I'd put money on this

2106:

There appears to be some confusion about this. Charleston is what seems to be most commonly reported, but Sumter, SC is indicated in a few places, including on a blog on his official site. I'm not sure how Northwestern came up with Washington, but Sumter still seems like the most credible answer;

1853:

I was just about to mention this here too -- the back and forth edits comments were getting a bit silly. Colbert is pronounced "Col-bear" in either context. Colbert is an Irish name, and it's usually pronounced with the T, but Stephen Colbert has always pronounced it without the T. It's what he's

976:

The article currently has an image of a segment it spells "Even Stevphen", while the Daily Show's 10 !@#$ ing years video on its website currently spells the segment Even Stephven. I wasn't sure if they changed the spelling here and there or whatnot so I didn't want to change it myself. If it's a

452:

As I said before, I completely agree that there's substantial justification for semi-protection but there are drawbacks to that option. My opinion is that it's more important to show that vandalism is routine and manageable on WP; semi-protection shows that vandalism does have a powerful negative

194:

we'll see it on snopes by this time next year. You're all ignoring the huge fact that Simonyi gave a passport to Stephen Colbert the fictional news personality, not Stephen Colbert the comedian. That explains the 1978 birth date somewhat as well. It's probably invalid because fictional characters

125:

Yeah, but Simonyi assured Stephen that they could work around the death-clause. He invited Stephen to visit Budapest, check out the construction site and then they would go from there. Simonyi is in fact the REAL ambassador and thus I assume the official document was real, as for the passport who

111:

Well, Simonyi also accepted that Colbert was fluent in Hungarian (though that really remains to be seen). Clearly, he'd need to have said more than he did to prove any kind of fluency (fluency which he probably doesn't have). My guess is that the passport is fake, the money is real, and that were

3229:

Stephen Colbert recently challenged someone as of the end of january 07 to post a check on reality and it was for sale and the first person to post that it was would gain 5$ . Unfortunatly, the reality word is / was under construction. There for no money could be gained. As an avid support of

2900:

It doesn't matter what anyone believes, though; it matters what can be demonstrated using reliable sources. The Abraxxia thing is interesting, but there's also a bit about Abraxxia on the Colbert Nation website, as well as the non-animated segments on the Report which aired much earlier than the

2203:

aside, why don't we either get the author of the NW article to provide a direct quote, or (more preferrable to me) email Colbert or his publicist and simply ask? I'll be glad to send an open email/reply and publish on the web, if so desired. Comments? Would this qualify as original research?

1742:

I just did the headings as an aesthetic thing. Remove them as you see fit. As far as the trivial info (joint custody) -- I literally had just watched the segment while editing, and threw it in. Also remove as needed. Regarding the third opinion -- I think supporting opinions should come from

784:

I believe there is a valid case for adding the two sites described above. First off, a disclaimer, I am not associated with either site, although I do know both their admins. Second, each of the two sites approaches Stephen Colbert differently - NoFactZone is primarily an exhaustive and detailed

2865:

Seriously though, nothing has changed since the last time this came up; we still don't know, in any official capacity, who runs the site. Without knowing that, all that's there is a forum (our linking policy lists forums under "links to be avoided") and a bunch of very funny anonymously-written

3995:

Only if it's fact, and Colbert scholars can prove it through facts using unbiased data and information. Since it's not (it's merely an opinion, in fact), then no, it shouldn't be here. You are, however, welcome to feel free to believe so, as it is your opinion, and no one can force/change your

3614:

And aside from that, we can't very well add '_______ critic' categories for everything that has gotten a few mentions on his show, and giving more attention to the Knowledge mentions than anything else feels like naval-gazing. I mean, this article doesn't even mention bears or Tek Janssen. --

3031:

That interview between Bill O'rielly and Jon Stewart, Bill does indeed call the The Daily Show's viewers "Stone Slacker." Stewart doesn't really respond, I think O'rielly might have been trying to bait Stewart into an arguement or something, if it was a joke it wasn't very good. Stewart wasn't

2806:

How do you know it hasn't been there since the beginning? Nevertheless, when the copyright notice appeared is irrelevant. It's a public acknowledgment of copyright by Comedy Central. It displays original Comedy Central produced content, is maintained by Comedy Central, is related to Stephen

2063:

are working on a sister site that takes the original Wiki information and expands it into a static knowledge source for Colbert fans. Hopefully with this new structure, the information will be in a format that will be appropriate for the Colbert fans searching for information not available on

1752:

I see where you're coming from -- what's not to love about consensus? -- but this point I think it might be faster just re-nominate, since I'm not sure how many editors are really passing through this page who are both experienced and uninvolved. Also, why did you delist this article from peer

1489:

The article gives ample coverage to the various facets of Colbert's career and personal life. This section garners a "weak pass" because I don't think it delves much into the influence and perception of Colbert's work. For instance, it is mentioned that he was voted by Times as one of the most

700:

There's no such thing as an official fansite. Fansites are run by fans. The Colbert Nation site calls itself a fansite, but it's a joke -- the site is run by Comedy Central, and Colbert constantly mentions it on-air as the official site of the show. CN should be linked to as the official site,

1674:

I have done some cleanup of several sections. I organized the colbert report section, as well as added some additional info and references on awards & accomplishments. I did an NPOV cleanup in the correspondants dinner section. I think this article is ready for GA status, but due to my

2459:

I suggest we make a section specifically dedicated to Colbert's awards and honors... multiple Emmy awards, pulitzer prize (sp?), word of the year, etc... definitely should be a section instead of buried in his career section. It would help expand the article, too. Anyone wanna volunteer?

2225:

Wow! And I had always assumed he was born in South Carolina, so it's a really interesting to learn that he was born in Washington D.C.! I guess he didn't live there too long, though. Now I'm wondering when his family moved to SC. Anyway, I know The Colbert Report is not a reliable source of

1634:-- Although a lot of it initally feels like original research, almost everything is well referenced/documented. There are still some thorns that kind of stick out, and are emphasized by non-necessary words ("however", etc.). Perhaps the NPOV cleanup suggested would alleviate a lot of this. 404:

I agree Midnighters. This page doesn't get vandalized as much as others but it guess it's kind of up the the discretion of people watching the page to see if they don't mind reverting all the edits for the benefits of what Anon user might add positively. I don't have a preference either

1888:"COLBERT is said to be of French Huguenot origin, many Colbert families fled into exile many years ago and scattered themselves far and wide, indeed many settled in Ireland , where many Colbert's find they have historic links. To read more on Huguenot exiles visit the Huguenot Webring. 3058:

Per previous discussions, this is an article about Stephen Colbert the person, and while it's kind of interesting to Wikipedians when he mentions us, it's not really a notable event in the context of his career. The Report has had over 200 shows now, during which time he's made fun of a

1076:, it lists his middle name as Tyrone. (Then again, if you read the rest of the page, most all of it is fictitious, so even though ColbertNation.com is Colbert's official "unofficial page", you have to take everything on it with a grain of salt). It is also listed as his middle name on 4214:

No he's not. He portrays an extremely right-wing person which, to the people he's trying to reach, seems like an idiot. I know plenty of conservatives in my area that don't "get" Colbert because they agree with a lot of the "foolish" stuff he says. Primary sources are RARELY objective.

1645:

means, please ensure the previous reviewer's objections are also addressed. GA nominations may be on hold for seven days -- please notify my talk page with concerns, questions, or requests. I also dropped the WPBio rating to a B-class until this article actually becomes GA-class. /

2382:

Look at his shoulder that partially covers the face of the woman in the upper left corner, and the side of his jacket in the lowermost right-side corner. It does look dubious, but could also be the result of a bad photo editor/photoshop editing. Surely there's a better image? ~

473:

I am unprotecting this article, as it has been semi-protected for 2 months. I'll be watching it closely and if excessive vandalism becomes a problem again, then I guess I'll have to re-protect it. I'm very uncomfortable with having an article protected for this long, however.

1675:

contributions, I'm calling for another established editor (anyone who hasn't contributed significantly) to second my approval. There will not be notice of this on the WP:GA candidacy noticeboard, so anyone agreeing on this page will do, and I will elevate to GA. Opinions? /

1490:

influential people but there is no reference to what exactly is influential about him that caused Time to include him on this list. Secondly, there is mention to critic's response to the Correspondent's dinner but what about critical perception of the greater body of his work?

1260:

What else could it say? Stephen Colbert did reports for the Daily Show. "This Week in God" is not a report. The only other way I see of fixing this is to say "Besides his work these recurring segment, memorable reports include..." but that would be redundant and long winded.

2002:

OK, so the article is no longer on public view, but could be restored if necessary? If that is the case, could I strongly suggest that if it is deleted completely, a link to my copy be posted, with any suitable disclaimer to protect both wikipedia and colbert.wikia.com?

770:

that Heroes and NoFactZone are acceptable. If we were having a debate about whether Knowledge should have links to fansites at all, I'm not sure where I'd weigh in, but since the precedent has already been established, I think it's fair to bow to that precendent here.

216:

This is a very good article. I would support it's use as a featured article once the external link problem is cleaned up. It seems once you click on a link it doesn't allow you to link back to the article easily. Otherwise, the content and substance is very good.

2122:

Ah, well he's said many times that he's from South Carolina, but not that he was born there. On Letterman, he said he "grew up" outside of Charleston...he also said in that same interview that his hometown is Charleston. Anyway, this all leads me to believe that he

1627:

by going to extremes. Parts of the article feel cultish, and then it feels like the editors attempt to counterbalance by providing lots of criticism. The awards dinner section feels especially guilty of this. I would suggest giving the article a more consistent

1805:

Okay, thanks. I wasn't sure if I was missing something about the peer review thing, but will probably relist it in a few days after I add a few things, probably at the biography wikiproject's peer review. Thanks again for all your insights/improvements. --

2964:

O'Reilly is a curmudgeon. Meanwhile, keep in mind these two were acting. I'm sure the thing was pretty much scripted. I'm not saying that on the pages, since I can't prove it, but these were not serious interviews, just fluff pieces. Fun to watch, though.

4376:

Uh, its in the first line of the page right under the article name: "This article is about Stephen Colbert, the actor. For the character he portrays on The Colbert Report, see Stephen Colbert (character)." Something similar is in the character article.

1772:

Fair enough. I did not do due dilligance regarding the re-listed peer review; I assumed it was the old tag. Please re-apply as needed. if there is no objection (or support) within 3 days from today I will elevate to GA status. Comments welcome.

3070:

article than this one. The two appearing on each others' shows was a notable Colbert Report moment, but pointing out specific jokes that Colbert made in one specific interview seems like going into a bit too much detail for a career overview. --

3091:

Steven Colbert tells how it is, doesnt lie, and has no feer. He is famous from strangers with candy and the daily show with jon stawart. But since then hes become a inspiration for many. STEVEN COLBERT IS THE SMARTEST MAN ALIVE (and funniest):

1305:

But how could you really verify it? Saying something's memorable is basically just stating an opinion, albeit a widely agreed upon one. Maybe we could say those certain reports are memorable because they've been viewed online so many times. --

1281:

Actually, the whole idea certain reports being more memorable than others may be difficult to verify using reliable sources. Unless a source has actually commented on those reports specifically, this may need to be reworked in order to meet

1660:

worst, I can delist myself as the reviewer and resubmit the request. My only hesitation there is that the GA candidate list is usually fairly backed up, and I might feel like I was putting more work off on someone else. Will advise. /

1429:. A lead should serve as an adequate summary of the article and the current lead leaves out several notable aspects such as the response and notoriety he got from the Correspondence dinner and the time he spent on "Strangers with Candy". 414:

Just to clarify I am not a huge fan of semi-protection but in my opinion this article was getting so much vandalism that editors (myself included) were having a hard time reverting all of it. Let's hope things have settled down now. --

605:

It's a public page and I've been accused of vandalism, it is not unreasonable to defend myself. The topic is unresolved. The links still come and go. Personally I don't think the links cited belong here but I have not edited them.

2253:

I think that it should be mentioned that Stephen Colbert was listed #2 on the list of Maxim's 10 Hottest TV News Anchors. It may be trivial, but I believe that it would add to the comedy of his work. The link to the specific page is:

1132:

I tried adding a section to the article about Colbert's mock Knowledge website, www.wikiality.com, but it was removed. Based on all of the controversy surrounding Knowledge and Colbert, the site should be mentioned in the article.

167:#2. :) Thanks for an excuse to watch that clip again btw--Andras Simonyi has GOT to be the coolest ambassador around. :) Oh--and Simonyi actually DID say the passport IS official! Good grief, Stephen Colbert is a Hungarian citizen. 1504:

Despite the "cult status" that Colbert has among his fans (and influence on Knowledge editors), this article is able to maintain a surprising NPOV tone without being overly flattering of its subject. The editors desire kudos for

3552:

Isn't there something missing from this article? Something that starts with W- and ends with -ikipedia? Shouldn't the Knowledge article on Stephen Colbert mention how he's probably the world's most prominent Knowledge critic?

3184:

3. Has officially been granted an honorary day in his name in Oshawa, Canada, as the result of a wager held between himself and John Gray, the mayor of Oshawa. This day is remembered on March 20th, Mayor John Gray's birthday.

145:

The latest rumour from Hungary's gossip rags is that they're going to name the bridge Kalber, which is a Hungarian traditional name (if I'm remembering the Anglicized spelling correctly), and pronounced almost identically to

2372:

Yes the photo was edited to make Colbert stand out more. As it says on the WikiCommons page: "Uploaded cleaned version of same image (run through NeatImage this time, plus some selective contrast and brightness adjustments"

1409:. I encourage the editors of this page to work on improving the article and addressing the concerns listed below. I also encourage the editors to consider resubmitting for GA status once these concerns have been addressed. 3894:

In his recent episode aired March 28th, 2007 he added Italy to his Axis of Evil and pretended to speak Italian. Obviously the first bit was for humor, and then he went on to speak several more lines without a translation.

3869:

This article is about the actor, not the character he portrays. On the show, his character claims to be an independent, but it's obvious he's conservative (and probably Republican); this is also a parody of Bill O'Reilly.

3590:

needs to be deleted, as it is entirely redundant with the "Colbert Report" article. But that's a separate topic. Still not convinced that the main bio page on Stephen Colbert should be silent about his Knowledge issues.

1612:

He performs regularly as a voice actor on Cartoon Network's Harvey Birdman: Attorney at Law, which airs as part of the network's Adult Swim lineup, providing the voices for the recurring characters "Reducto" and "Phil Ken

1174:

He says alot of things, but they don't all become notable as a result. Also, he didn't coin truthiness (but he did popularize it). If you want to add it again, I won't remove it, but I suspect that somebody else will. –

2024:

and see what are guidelines are about linking to external wikis -- I'm not exactly sure of them myself, but they might have a preference about linking directly to the article vs. linking to the main colbert.wikia page.

1880:

The name Colbert is ultimately French in origin (indeed, one of the main sections of the Louvre is called the Pavillon Colbert), although the name (and presumably the family) spread to Ireland via England. See, e.g.,

4304:

In the article, it states that Colbert is working on a book and the title has not been released. The title is "I Am America (And So Can You!)" and it is available on Amazon.com for pre-order. Annonymous April 29,2007

2363:"Doctored"? I believe a photo is doctored if it's trying to show you something that isn't there or hide something that is there, simply retouching a photograph while not trying to change its meaning isn't doctoring. 4337:

I believe so. Apparently his eardrum was removed, and while making him lose hearing in that ear, also allowed him to do tha ear flip thing. I remember seeing a video on YouTube before, but I can't find it anymore.

3758:

both deserve two different pages as these are two different people. Stephen Colbert the actor and comic portrays Stephen Colbert the character, but they are in no way the same person. I removed the merge request.

2170:

family. Also, the text about Colbert's 2006 Daily Show Emmy says that it was his only win in 2006; he also recieved Emmys for the Daily Show in 2003, 2004 and 2005, but nothing for The Colbert Report so far. --

2080:

Everything Below is why you should look at Knowledge for only shits and giggles, you can present anything in a serious enough tone and make it seem plausible, as long as the truthiness of the facts is vague.

3004:

had nothing good to say about Stewart. And the answer is that he was joking. Colbert didn't mean a thing he said in that interview. Actually watch the show to get a sense of how he was trying to be funny. --

715:

Fansite in that it's the site for fans as opposed to a more-typical official site, rather than a fan-run site, sorry. I still maintain that we shouldn't be letting Nofactzone and Snarkivist advertise here. -

1609:

The novel was a collaboration between Colbert, Amy Sedaris and Paul Dinello, which tells the story of a small town threatened by the impending destruction of a massive dam in photos and fictional interviews.

825:

like ABC, NBC, Discovery and any other network provides forums for their fans. Those are not considered fan sites, and as such, Colbert Nation shouldn't be, either. ('cept, of course, with tongue in cheek.)

240:

The section on the 2006 White House Correspondents' Association Dinner has several criticisms. If you have any critical material you'd like included in the article (using reliable sources, conforming to

2959:

Just saw Colbert on O'reilly and I was wondering why he didn't have anything good to say about Stewart. He kept saying negative things about him and I am not sure why. Anyone have light to shed on this?

1599:-- By far the biggest deficiency in this article. Malformed, juxtaposed subject/clause agreement, overly complex or downright grammatically incorrect sentences. A few examples (by no means inclusive): 1519:

While the article does seem to be a bit of a vandal target there doesn't seem to that much substantial change being made even though almost 200 edits to the article have been made this month alone (see

3936:

about it. I don't agree with having it there, and will leave it for now with an unsourced tag, but if others can agree on what to do with it, then please let us do whatever is agreed on. Thanks! --

2096:"Colbert, 41, was born in Washington, D.C., and raised in South Carolina, the youngest of 11 children." Is this true? Or did this guy get his facts wrong? I thought he was born in South Carolina... -- 3327:

But Colbert was not the only one to bring up the issue; he got it from the New York Times and other news sources. Colbert just named it. If companies are paying people to "fix" Knowledge pages, as

1000: 997: 662:

No fact Zone.net was deleted first; after I added it back in, both fan sites were deleted. I think we need to make some kind of decision about this...one site or the other should be included. --

1640:-- Technically, this article hits the high points in what I would expect. A "weak pass" would be my vote, but a little more depth (as opposed to slathering it with references) might be in order. 2874:

is that he may or may not have written the content on Tekjansen.com. If another source will independantly verify that, it will make for a fascinating link. Until then, it makes sense to wait.

2770:

is condemned by many different churches. I'm not sure the Catholic Church ever did. But it's a big church and some sects of it may have done so more recently, but not when COlbert was a child.

2658:

Colbert is listed as a "Roman Catholic entertainer" and "American Roman Catholic" in the category listings, but is he really a Catholic? From his satirical performances I would assume he only

1974:

Item: article was deleted. I am editor for colbert.wikia.com, I am now hosting said article. If you don't want to have it here, at least consider an external link to said article. Thank you.

1106:

IMDB and NNDB both have s tendency to mirror us, so they're not always useful for verifying what we've already said). Now that I'm thinking about it though, "Tyrone" is in the credits of the

2565:

emmy awards... the show was nominated for four, but one was for best director. steven wasnt the director. jim hoskinson was. steven has won three emmys for his work on the daily show.

1839:

Still, after a while, he stops himself. "I think I need to start calling him Col-bear," says the actor, using the correct pronunciation of his surname, "and me Col-bert. It's getting weird."

1020:

On the actual opening of Even Stepvhen they have the v behind the p and h - therefore shouldn't it be Even Stepvhen? I can't believe I'm arguing the point xD but still - just a thought... --

1216:

of his reports. It in no way implies that all these reports were from "This Week in God" that is why the Singing Senators thing is there too. This also was not a "This Week in God" report.

3168:

i found this under whose line is it anyway in wikipedia= In addition, seven years before creating The Colbert Report, Stephen Colbert took the fourth spot at a taping in the first season

1371:

I've gone ahead and changed it. Single words can and do matter, particularly when they're the difference between stating a fact and an opinion. And by the way, welcome to Knowledge. :)

2226:

information, but I'd like to note that I just finished re-watching a clip of Stephen saying he was born in Washington D.C. in his interview with Congresswoman Eleanor Holmes Norton. --

4180:

This is a direct extension of the work they did on The Daily Show, and it plays very much the same game as my character, who is a well-intentioned, poorly informed, high-status idiot.

2983:

I'm not sure which "he" said that, but if it was O'Reilly, Stewart probably would not disagree. Generally, keep in mind that O'Reilly is a muckraker and an entertainer. He comes from

1226:

The way the next sentence begins, it implies that the next examples are those of the "This Week in God" series though. Maybe it should be worded differently so as not to mislead. --

2866:

science fiction (pretty neat, but not a unique resource about the subject of the article, Stephen Colbert). Knowledge isn't a link directory -- we try to include links when they're

596:

This thread has been dead for nearly a quarter of a year. There is absolutely no reason to try and and re-incite more conflict. I'm one breath short of calling this the t-word. /

504:

I'm a bit uneasy with editors adding back external links to fan sites on this article which were removed by other editors... Why? Well it's clear that those adding the links back (

2705:

The citations are correct as they are interviews with Colbert himself (not in character). He is a devout Catholic but grew up in a family that also cherished intellect and humor.

2181:

Update: I've emailed the author of the NW article, and he's certain Colbert directly stated that he was born in DC. I know this isn't how we usually do things (out of concern for

2974:

When Stewart was on O'Reilly's show he called people who watch The Daily Show "stoned slackers". And he was actually mad that John Kerry went on Stewart's show instead of his.

2797:

That doesn't mean or prove anything. If it really were a Comedy Central venture, it would have had a copyright notice on it from the beginning, like Colbertnation.com did. --

4228:

satirical, and that he doesn't know what he's doing when he performs them? Because some of your friends find Moby Dick to be a science fiction novel does not mean it is one.

2758:, and how he questioned why it was so reputed by the leaders of his religion. Speaking of which, if I didn't get that from the article, we should add that... (Oh, I did.) - 2389:

My guess is the photo was too dark, and someone altered his image to bring it out without washing out the background. No harm, and it's not too bad of a photo. If you think

4121:

While I am pretty sure that the writer is referring to the show's first year in 2006, it sounds as if it was the WHCA Dinner's first year, which is obviously not the case.

3066:

By the same token, I feel the extra description of his O'Reilly interview (tacked on at the end of the "other roles" section, for some reason) would make more sense in the

648:

here, but if the rule demands there be only one, we may need to discuss the Heroes and FactZone in that context. Regardless, there's no reason both of them should be gone.

3313:

The Colbert/Wikipedia battle became more interesting with the overnight Wikilobbying battle last night. Does anyone know why this page was deleted? 21:25 January 30 2007

1843:"Col-bear" is the correct pronunciation, but he jokes about changing it to "Col-bert" for himself to differentiate himself from his character. Please, no more reverts! -- 4249:

Someone (or some 'bot) has deleted all spaces within citations. This fucks up editing and diffing the article for everyone else. So, thanks, but no, thanks, stop it. --

3182:

2. Dubbed the phrase "Reality has to be contained" (I forget the exact phrasing he used), which he called viewers to again amend to the Knowledge entry of 'reality'.

3670:

joined the daily show after Mr. Colbert left the show - I hesitate to say "replaced" Mr. Colbert, but I think that would be a useful link in Colbert's main article.

1246:

I'm talking about this part: "...and "This Week in God," a weekly report on topics in the news pertaining to religion, presented with the help of "The God Machine".

3139:

Hi. The first paragraph of the page ends as, 'deadpan comedic delivery'. There is no such word as 'comedic', it should be 'comic'. Please make this change. Thanks.

2322:

flat tuxedo notch. and lighting near the top right of the notch. The photo isn't particularly good even if it were to be a true photo, I think it should be changed.

3120:

Funny. Now please leave and let the adults speak. And if you're serious, then I just do not know what to say , except that you are right and I want to marry you.

2185:), but considering we have conflicting reliable sources, I'm thinking NW may be the source to go with after all. We've certainly got no lack of sources saying he 1715: 1436:

needs a substantial rewrite. In its current state it is torn between wanting to be a list and wanting to be prose. Similarly the short paragraphs in the section

490:

I noticed that there has been no discussion that I can see on the lock on the article in 2 months, and was wondering if it still needs to be protected. Thanks!

4152:

For the source for the assertion in the first paragraph that Colbert's routine is portraying opinionmaking fools, see his own assertion in the Onion interview:

308:. It's a piece by the Wash Po's Richard Cohen that pretty well expresses my own feelings about Colbert, and is in response to one of Colbert's defining moments. 156:

Hey, does anyone know what the piece of music they play when they exit on the ambassador and Stephen? I assume it's Hungarian, or at least meant to be vaguely.

1606:

Stephen Colbert is co-author the satirical text-and-picture novel Wigfield: The Can Do Town That Just Might Not, which was published in 2003 by Hyperion Books.

268:

I think it's possible that someone could cogently criticize some of the themes underlying his gags; OP should post more details on what he wants to criticize.

3750:, but did not give a reason on the talk page. Anyone who knows of Stephen Colbert would know that merging these two does not make sense. It is similar to how 1387:

reports... Who cares? It's like, why are they even being mentioned? I'll tell you why! Because they are memorable! Not that anyone would know that NOW... --

4084:

Doesn't sound too unlikely, but probably won't happen. But we shall see -- I could be wrong. I for one wouldn't mind having Colbert in the White House. --

1199:

It was just a "live report from London" where he corresponded with Jon about not being able to talk about the scandal. I just watched it on Youtube here:

2500:

Stephen was named breakout person of the year by Vh1's Big in '06 contest. I don't know if it's worth mentioning or it's a little too fangirl-obsessive.

348:

It still seems to get vandolised once or twice a day, but really not as bad as it was. It might be ok to take the protection off and see what happens.--

102:

Is it just me, or was Stephen Colbert granted official Hungarian citizenship last night on the show?!?! Simonyi gave him a friggin' Hungarian passport!!

4263:

I think its worth mentioning about his unofficial website and also that if you type "Greatest Living America" in google you would get Stephen Colbert--

2127:

probably born in North Carolina, not Washington D.C. But this article just confused me. Another question: do you happen to know when he got married? --

2891:

current original content from Comedy Central. It really is a brick wall battle, some people won't believe anything unless they see it on television.

1271:

Maybe it could say "Some of Colbert's memorable correspondant reports for the show include..." in place of just the "Memorable reports include..." --

4157:

AVC: Jon Stewart recently said he sees The Colbert Report as sort of a 30-minute Daily Show segment. Do you see it as an extension of The Daily Show?

1915:

Colbert has always been a vandalism magnet. This page has been sprotected and unprotected many times before. Hopefully it will trail off eventually.

579:. No one at tekjansen.com has "vandalized" Knowledge by removing your link. I know that I have not removed any other link, only added a link to the 236:

Just because he mentioned your site and various other internet fads on his show doesn't mean he's perfect. He deserves a criticisms section or page.

3573:, as it's satirical, sarcastic in-character praise rather than actual outspoken opinions by Colbert the actor. But where it is, reflecting that the 4124: 3239: 3096: 2630: 1008:. I say we got with the one with more Google hits or we decide that it doesn't matter which one is posted as long as it is Stephven or Stevphen. 112:

Stephen to actually go and visit the site, he might not be fortunate enough to return to the States in one piece. Not if he really wants his own

4280:

is running their "Most Influential" people this year and it looks like Stephen Colbert is actually on top, tied in rating with Nintendo founder

3192: 1586:

I am placing this nomination on hold, with commentary. Please note I am commenting from my POV without having read the previous GA discussion.

2490:

Done and done. It was just a cut and paste (that's acceptable, right?). It was already grouped together, just without a definitive section. -

1753:

review? The PR instructions seem to indicate that it's ok to have more than one peer review, and the request has been open for < 3 days...

136:

The date of birth on the passport is 1978, so it's unlikely that it's real unless they just happened to be 14 years off on his birth date. --

3845:

He claims in the show to be a moderate or independant, however it is obvious that he is a conservative, most likely a registered republican

4069: 2554: 2516: 2338: 759: 731: 689: 622:

While there has been previous discussion on the article talk page it seems rather minimal... Might be worth looking at this again? Thanks/

4205:

Colbert's the person who creates and performs the characters. He's a pretty good objective source as to whether they are foolish or not.

2921:

Pantsman somebody or other has been vandalizing this page, replacing the entire thing with "He has recently admitted he is a homosexual."

3987: 929: 3504:

Fixed for "This Week in God." I also removed the link to the God Machine, as it would have been the exact same link. Any objections? --

744:

Marginally. Then I could ask that user why they added the link. Even then, I'd still not want them unless it was a heck of a reason. -

357:

This isn't a continuation of the protection put in place after the wikiality episode, it's a more recent lock that was put in place by

246:

parody, and many pundits dismiss Colbert (and Jon Stewart) since they're on Comedy Central, alongside shows like Crank Yankers, etc. --

220:

BTW-- I think the page can be unprotected. Eight times in 24 hour is not that many compared to some of the other bio pages in Wiki.

4099: 4036: 4011: 3339:. The short answer to your question is, "it violates Knowledge's content guidelines." If someone wants to add a relevant section to 3331:

is reported to be doing, than that merits its own page. There is no self-promotion involved, let alone spam. 21:55 January 30 2007.

3251: 2156: 3015:

language expert come in and tell the audience exactly what we expect her to say about whatever public figure she's analyzing. It's

2662:

a demented Catholic and isn't really a Christian in real life. From the way he satirized Christianity one would doubt he is one. —

3717:

that sums up the current ongoing wars that the USA is involved in, the Iraq war, the Afghanistan war and the War on Terrorism. --

2838:

I'd just like to note that I removed the link again because It fits much better in either the character or the report articles...

2579:

The Daily Show won Peabodies while he was there. Is he a Peabody winner or is he just joking? I dunno whether to put ] on or not.

1829:

There have been a number of back-and-forth edits referring to the pronunciation of Colbert's name. Here is a quote from the cited

3945: 3778: 2642: 1734: 529: 515: 3180:

1. Help spread the rumour of the elephant population tripling, by calling for his viewers to record the statement on Knowledge.

944:

Sounds good to me! It probably was a joke referring to or related to Stephen demanding that genius grant in The Colbert Report.

3519:

This wiki introduces him as Stephen Tyrone Colbert. Is that REALLY his middle name? -Northridge01:44, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

2189:

in Charleston, but that's a different issue. I wish I had a better way of divining this, but that's all I've got to go on. --

1346:

Examples are fine, but we can't claim something is "memorable" without having a source that says so. Memorable is subjective.

306: 4136: 3536: 2858:

independent source that has suggested that the site is maintained by Comedy Central. In that regard, it's no different from

1593:-- Lots of good sources. I am especially impressed with the attention to detail regarding multiple cites of the same source. 89: 81: 76: 64: 59: 2470:...Contrary to my above comment on the word of the year inclusion, if there's a section like this, certainly put that in. - 3108: 2787:

Comedy Partners now has a copyright notice at the bottom right-hand corner of the page, when highlighted with the mouse.

1700:

about the headings themselves, since there's only a paragraph for each. I'm really happy for the cleanup overall, though.

3855:

Are you talking about Stephen Colbert the person, or Stephen Colbert the character that he plays on The Colbert Report? -

3417: 900:

Hey, it mentions that he is a member of Mensa. What's the source for this? I really want to satisfy my curiousity, too!

2040: 4288: 3747: 3587: 3570: 3288: 3211: 2012:

Sorry I missed your comment before. Of the top of my head, I'd think it would make sense to link to that article from

1092:

is an Irish location and a common Irish name. Hope this is enough documentation to keep this fact in the Wiki page.

424:

I think we may have been wrong. The vandals may have already come back. This may be an ongoing problem similar to the

4164:

SC: I sort of see The Daily Show as a 30-minute preamble. It's like an appetizer before you get to the main course.

4062:

It has been rumored recentley that Colbert will be a popular write in for the up coming 2008 presidential election.

2093: 3755: 3673:

Colbert did not leave the Daily Show. He appears as an adjunct to the show, continuing his relationship with it.

2043:

page can now be found on two different sources on the Internet. The original Wiki information can be found at the

2020:, since it's more about the show than the actor/comedian. Also, you might want to double check on the talk page of 1944:

hi, i just noticed she's not credited in the pic -- can this be done? it seems an odd little omission. thanks. --

1139:

Wikiality is in no way affiliated with Comedy Central, The Colbert Report, or Stephen Colbert, but we'd like to be.

1003: 38: 3898:

Does anyone have any sources to suggest he speaks it, or is this a bit for the show? If so, a note can be added.

2255: 1985: 1854:

called in all of the radio and TV interviews he's done, which are presumably out-of-character and in the article

2754:

He's got to be Catholic for the previous reasons and because I recall reading an article about his past playing

2268: 2334: 755: 727: 685: 546:. The links had been part of the article for a very long time and allowed to stand since...July, I believe? -- 533: 4073: 4047: 2550: 2512: 3983: 3193:

http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20070126/colbert_oshawa_070127/20070127?hub=Entertainment

1006: 3476: 3298: 3247: 1179: 1156: 4021:

PS. Nice try with the remark, trying to pretend that you're me. Unfortunately, I noticed it right away. --

2152: 4331: 4140: 4091: 4028: 4003: 3718: 3695:

Are you joking? The Ben and Jerry site you linked to links back to the Yahoo link already in the article.

3275: 2924:

First of all, I think your cool. Second, I think we might want to request that you be elected presedent.

2525:

As long as we're doing Awards & Honors, might as well mention this (just need a verifiable source). /

1361:

So you're suggesting we change just one word? Is it really that big of a deal? What else could it say? --

3639: 3271: 2821: 2798: 2731: 2596: 2546: 2508: 2330: 269: 4314: 4132: 3979: 3899: 3846: 3077: 2281: 1110:, which probably makes it enough to go on. I still really want to know what he said last night, though. 1021: 911: 4285: 3826: 3674: 3243: 3104: 2767: 2755: 1272: 1251: 1227: 1203: 954: 663: 137: 2148: 4294: 4065: 3975: 3959: 3941: 3933: 3929: 3774: 3156:

Yes dude, you are right. My dictionary didn't have an entry for comedic. Guess, I gotta update it. --

3075: 3033: 2935: 2909: 2878: 2638: 2634: 2542: 2504: 2326: 2266: 2227: 2218: 2193: 2174: 2144: 2128: 2111: 2097: 2031: 1994: 1960: 1921: 1871: 1810: 1762: 1730: 1722: 1706: 1691: 1573: 1377: 1352: 1326: 1296: 1116: 1063: 988: 945: 920: 901: 874: 776: 707: 654: 634: 547: 523: 519: 509: 186: 47: 17: 3491: 3463:

I'm seeing a lot of red links on the talk pages of people who joke on this page. It'd be helpful to

2566: 1546:. I would use some editorial judgment on which one or two photos of the 5 best illustrate the topic. 567:

to de-list other sites from the External Links section. This is simply not true. Please try to be

258: 4128: 3796: 3369: 3145: 3122: 2419: 1855: 1834: 745: 717: 675: 454: 396: 362: 309: 247: 3100: 2595:

He would have been a writer on the show at the time, so I would consider him a Peabody winner. --

1152:

Controversy? He mentioned us like twice, and there was some vandalism as a result. No big deal. –

4264: 3565: 3531: 3379: 3349: 3292: 3201: 3067: 2892: 2830: 2808: 2788: 2695: 2013: 1892: 1176: 1153: 826: 787: 607: 588: 576: 480: 164: 147: 117: 3495: 1882: 1190:

Maybe someone could also add it to the Wikiality article. I would, but it has semi-protection.

1002:. And apparantly Comedy Central uses them interchangeably (one of the hosts of "Even Stephven,") 3920:, which purports to be information from the economist. I removed it because I saw it as being 4085: 4022: 3997: 3451: 3435: 3424: 3388: 2585: 1250:" See how that makes it sound like "Memorable reports of "This Week in God" include..."? -- 168: 127: 103: 3688: 4281: 4051: 2839: 2663: 2299:" which is clearly New York Magazine. So, could someone please fix this since it is locked. 1862:

up in the middle of the night and slapped me across the face I'd still say Stephen Col-BEAR.

701:

regardless of what it calls itself. I'm not sure that has any bearing actual fansite links.

464: 433: 3577:

has ridiculed Knowledge, including the writing staff and not just Colbert, seems right. --

4367: 4229: 4206: 4187: 3937: 3925: 3917: 3909: 3881: 3787: 3770: 3714: 3472: 3072: 2975: 2906: 2901:

cartoon. With regards to ads and copyright notices, I still think it's worth checking out

2875: 2706: 2304: 2263: 2215: 2190: 2171: 2108: 2065: 2051:. The information, edited to clean up the original data, can be found temporarily on the 2028: 2017: 1991: 1957: 1931: 1918: 1868: 1807: 1759: 1726: 1703: 1688: 1570: 1402: 1388: 1374: 1362: 1349: 1337: 1323: 1307: 1293: 1113: 1093: 1085: 1060: 1033: 871: 773: 704: 651: 572: 568: 505: 491: 339: 183: 3402:

Well, I tried to put your entry into the "reality" page but it was locked, Stephen. ;) VX

2480:

There isn't, yet, but I propose we create one and restructure the article accordingly. /

910:

If there's no source and nobody can give one, then the information should be removed. --

113: 3063:

of things, which for the most part are not worth listing individually in this article.

1072:

There's a few semi-official places on the web that this can be found. If you go to the

741:

Would you disapprove of this any less if the site editors weren't the ones adding them?

4362: 3856: 3760: 3751: 3620: 3464: 3198:

Apologies on this being a 'weak' link, but the above information is hot off the press.

3020: 2988: 2966: 2723: 2423: 2398: 2394: 1624: 1464:

The article is mostly well referenced with the vast majority of references coming from

1426: 674:

Colbertnation is the official fan site. Why are we letting other fansites spam here? -

318:

That's been in the article since it occured. Did you actually read the article? ;-) /

294: 242: 223: 4381: 4370: 4342: 4317: 4267: 4253: 4232: 4219: 4209: 4200: 4190: 4104: 4077: 4054: 4041: 4016: 3962: 3948: 3902: 3884: 3874: 3859: 3849: 3839: 3829: 3808: 3799: 3790: 3781: 3763: 3735: 3721: 3699: 3677: 3652: 3642: 3623: 3595: 3581: 3557: 3541: 3508: 3498: 3480: 3455: 3438: 3428: 3406: 3392: 3354: 3321: 3317:

It could be the obvious self-promotion nature so as to be in the same spirit as Spam.

3303: 3278: 3255: 3218: 3204: 3160: 3151: 3128: 3112: 3023: 3009: 2991: 2978: 2969: 2948: 2938: 2911: 2895: 2880: 2842: 2833: 2811: 2801: 2791: 2774: 2762: 2743: 2734: 2709: 2700: 2682: 2646: 2608: 2599: 2589: 2569: 2529: 2494: 2484: 2474: 2464: 2448: 2439: 2426: 2401: 2377: 2367: 2356: 2307: 2284: 2230: 2220: 2208: 2195: 2176: 2131: 2113: 2107:

it's close near enough to Charleston to account for some of the reoprts otherwise. --

2100: 2068: 2034: 2007: 1997: 1978: 1963: 1948: 1934: 1924: 1909: 1895: 1874: 1847: 1812: 1793: 1765: 1747: 1709: 1694: 1679: 1664: 1649: 1576: 1556: 1391: 1380: 1365: 1355: 1340: 1329: 1310: 1299: 1275: 1265: 1254: 1240: 1230: 1220: 1206: 1184: 1161: 1147: 1119: 1096: 1066: 1053:

Don't know if anyone caught this, but during Colbert's appearance on Comedy Central's

1036: 1032:

The name was indeed "Even StepVhen" and there's plenty of Google hits for it as well.

1024: 1012: 991: 981: 957: 948: 939: 923: 914: 904: 877: 862: 829: 795: 779: 764: 736: 710: 694: 666: 657: 637: 626: 610: 600: 591: 550: 494: 485: 467: 457: 436: 419: 409: 399: 389: 377: 365: 352: 342: 312: 297: 272: 261: 250: 226: 201: 189: 171: 150: 140: 130: 120: 106: 4277: 3667: 3578: 3524: 3344: 3336: 3318: 3006: 2870:

with regards to the subject of the article. The only thing Tekjansen.com really says

2759: 2740: 2690: 2605: 2535: 2526: 2491: 2481: 2471: 2461: 2445: 2436: 2353: 2348: 2296: 2205: 2182: 2048: 2004: 1975: 1906: 1844: 1790: 1774: 1744: 1676: 1661: 1646: 1422: 1317: 1287: 1144: 1089: 859: 792: 597: 560: 475: 406: 386: 349: 319: 290: 289:

that criticism can be included (and properly referenced) here--otherwise it violates

3287:

I agree that Stephen Colbert Day should be mentioned - either in this article or in

4216: 4197: 3836: 3448: 3421: 2771: 2580: 2200: 2021: 1945: 1465: 1406: 1073: 978: 644: 416: 374: 358: 160: 3687:

And reference 62 should link to the message on the Ben and Jerry's official site (

3492:

http://en.wikipedia.org/List_of_The_Daily_Show_recurring_segments#This_Week_in_God

3490:

whoever is locking this, please fix the link to this week in god, it should go to

585:

the most irrationally hated Colbert-related website in the pre-hereafter omniverse

565:

delightfully friendly and incredibly attractive members of the tekjansen.com forum

395:

more than qualifies for such a protective measure per administrative consensus. --

361:

about a week ago, which I think is completely unnecessary and should be lifted. --

2094:

http://www.northwestern.edu/magazine/winter2005/alumninews/close-ups/colbert.html

4339: 4328: 4250: 3921: 3880:

His exact claim is "i'm a independent that is often mistaken for a republican"--

3871: 3805: 3732: 3728: 3696: 3505: 3434:

Done. Leave me a message on my talk page if this turns out to be controversial.

3403: 3157: 2945: 2714:

Word on the street in NYC and Hollywood is that he is in fact a Catholic in the

2604:

Doesn't he proudly display/espouse the award on the "mantle" during his show? /

1930:

That was the funniest vandalism ever. People who do stuff like that are cool --

1553: 1283: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

4378: 3649: 3592: 3554: 3468: 3215: 2374: 2256:

http://maximonline.com/slideshows/index.aspx?slideId=2514&imgCollectId=121

2044: 1262: 1237: 1217: 1200: 1009: 936: 623: 180:

bridge named after him -- anyone else see the urban legend potential in this?

3214:

not here. This is the comedian's real life article not the satirical pundit.

3616: 3340: 3328: 3169: 2384: 1081: 425: 197: 2902: 2859: 1471:

The one exception to the "well referenced" assessment would be the section

126:

knows. BTW, does everybody in the United States know the word "híd" now??

4284:

but coming out ahead due to the number of votes. Should this be included?

4196:

Colbert's own words are hardly NPOV. It's not good to state them as fact.

3274:, as well? The vandalism is getting very more tiresome and stupid. Thanks 1077: 385:

And now there have been 6 acts of vandolism in less than 24 hours. Guh.--

2364: 4050:

does redirect here, Perhaps some explanation should be given as to why.

1714:

Oh, and with regard to getting a third opinion, would the first comment

791:

entry. I put these comments up for consideration by the senior editors.

2727: 2052: 3972:

Shouldn't the article mention that he's the greatest living American?

540:

We assumed that the links were removed as vandalism from the folks at

2262:

Already is. See the last paragraph of the Colbert Report section. --

987:

No, you were correct, so I changed it. Thanks for pointing that out.

325:

There is no criticism section because there is nothing to critisize.

3638:

An "award" of sorts, Stephen is credited in Firefox's About dialog.

1405:, I unfortunately have to de-list the article at this time from the 559:

It’s been quite a while since I’ve been by, and I just noticed this

1443:

I would also be aware of some "redundant prose" like the line from

581:

site of the award-winning though as-yet-unpublished Tek Jansen book

463:

Okay, that makes sense. I agree, we can't give in to the vandals. -

4313:

I think its worth mentioning that Stephen Colbert is a Catholic.--

4186:

The words I used are actually more restrained than Colbert's own.

4115:

In the introduction, the following sentence should be clarified:

1905:

The article has been semi-protected due to frequent vandalsim. /

919:

I agree. I'll wait to see if anybody replies before removing it.

544: 3727:

So? If you want to add it to the article, you might want to see

3291:. I certainly expected to find it in one of those two places. 1865:

So it might be affected, but it's definitely not a stage name.

1529:

6. It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.

285:

than Knowledge. Once a notable critic has criticised Colbert,

3233:

Nathan Duclos Nathanduclos@hotmail.com Oshawa Ontario, Canada

932:

who also had this tidbit of wisdom while editing the same day

25: 3835:

It says in the article that he is a self-described Democrat.

1988:, so we'll see what happens. It may wind up being restored. 1883:

http://pages.123-reg.co.uk/genealogyjen-1097238/jlcd/id8.html

1336:

of him doing what he's known for, so they should stay in. --

575:

in other editors. This kind of sniping on the talk pages is

3143:

Comedic is a word last I checked. Just type it into Google.

2060: 2056: 928:

I went through the history and the Mensa thing was added by

4224:

Are you seriously suggesting that Colbert's characters are

4171:

AVC: Do you think the sensibility is pretty much the same?

2622: 2433: 2432:

Unless it fits in very well somewhere, I think the article

584: 580: 564: 541: 3689:

http://www.benjerry.com/features/americone_dream_index.cfm

2829:

What kind of "rights" do you suppose they are reserving?

2295:

Influential People of 2006." However the link goes here: "

855: 2862:, which is apparently copyrighted by Comedy Partners too. 2627:(Couldn't edit it myself because this is a new account) 4363:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Stephen_Colbert_%28character%29

1538:

There is a bit of image clutter around the sections on

1521: 933: 4273:

Stephen Colbert - Time's most influential man of 2007?

3343:, then it can be proposed and discussed over there. — 3236:

postscript, Is the 5$ in American or Canadian funds?

999:

has a whole bunch more Google hits than Even Stephven

4354:

less impotant as the link exists in the first line).

2422:

honors. Is this worth adding to the main article? --

2418:

I wasn't sure if anyone had seen that Colbert's work

534:

Knowledge:External links#Links normally to be avoided

500:

External links being added by those who run the sites

281:

Yes, someone could, so long as they did it somewhere

2722:

himself and his family is Jewish (thus making him a

4327:

Does this have anything to do with his deafness? --

2820:easilly throw up a similar note on their own site. 1005:(Daily Show: Colbert - Even Stevphen with Ed Helms) 2297:http://nymag.com/news/features/influentials/16926/ 1421:The Lead is very short and doesn't hold up to the 3691:) rather than to a temporary link at Yahoo news. 2536:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LXtZpPGVl1g&NR 1401:After reviewing the article in accordance to the 1143:So no, it should be included in this article. -- 543:or some other site that perceived a slight, like 3586:Well, that leads me to believe that the article 1940:Credit Amy Sedaris in "Strangers with Candy" pic 3000:I believe the user may have been wondering why 2730:," both of whom were/are commonly Catholic). -- 1856:"Great Charlestonian or Greatest Charlestonian" 4111:White House Correspondents' Association Dinner 3932:put it back after I left a comment on her/his 3865:The Person. In the sho, he "IS A REBUBLICAN". 3804:Agreed. The two articles shouldn't be merged. 1495:4. It follows the neutral point of view policy 4272: 3795:The two shouldn't be merged as per spirit. -- 2393:free photo is poor, check out the one on the 2258:Sorry, I forgot to login, I'm TheChrisParker 8: 2944:What makes you think it was an insult? ;) -- 2807:Colbert, and belongs in the links section. 935:. I'm deleting the Mensa thing immediately. 3746:H2g2bob suggested a merge of this page and 3648:What makes you think its the same Colbert? 1455:2. It is factually accurate and verifiable. 563:that there is some kind of campaign by the 116:, anyway. Remember the whole death-clause? 3825:Which party is he? Republican or Democrat? 2689:evidence that one doesn't believe in it. — 2534:This is the video of the award ceremony. 1475:where there are a few unreferenced claims. 430:Unfortunately, I'd suggest a semi-protect. 2538:sorry I don't have an account to sign in. 633:not editors whose names I recognized. -- 4293:Probably not until he actually wins it. 3537: 3532: 2317:Main Photo of Stephen Colbert is altered 2290:New York Magazine vs. New Yoker Magazine 2280:being a piece of vandalism. --ArcMonkey 1623:-- The article seems to try and balance 2248: 2347:I'm no professinoal, but I absolutely 2039:The information housed in the deleted 432:This is not something we can ignore. - 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 3916:Hi! I removed the last paragraph of 3270:Can an admin please block changes to 2739:Since when is Colbert a Jewish name? 305:This might be a good place to start: 7: 4358:the body of the article to find it. 3786:I agree. They should not be merged. 4349:Link to Stephen Colbert (Character) 3174:Self Proclomations and Achievements 1084:It can also be found in the recent 532:)) are the folk who run the sites: 338:why this article is still locked?? 3662:Dan Bakkedahl joins the Daily Show 3634:S.C. listed as Firefox Contributor 2444:I'll add it in that section now. - 2313:Because he/she shouldn't have to. 24: 4322: 4148:Colbert portraying foolish people 4110: 2420:Truthiness won "Word of the Year" 2041:Colbert Report recurring elements 329:Why this article is still locked? 3087:i want to put in your profile 1984:Actually, the article is now on 29: 4097: 4034: 4009: 3683:Colbert Ice Cream not a Rumor = 3486:fix link to god machine segment 3420:should be added to "see also". 3135:Minor change in first paragraph 3053:by referring to it on his show. 3042: 2414:Colbert wins "Word of the Year" 2249:Maxim's 10 Hottest News Anchors 1480:3. It is broad in its coverage. 1212:It says memorable reports from 2586: 2092:In reference to this article: 1440:should be merged or rewritten. 227:18:44, 27 September 2006 (UTC) 172:16:13, 23 September 2006 (UTC) 141:08:38, 17 September 2006 (UTC) 131:18:32, 15 September 2006 (UTC) 121:18:01, 15 September 2006 (UTC) 107:15:30, 15 September 2006 (UTC) 1: 3700:00:38, 22 February 2007 (UTC) 3653:23:44, 14 February 2007 (UTC) 3643:23:40, 14 February 2007 (UTC) 3624:23:11, 14 February 2007 (UTC) 3596:06:30, 13 February 2007 (UTC) 3582:01:38, 13 February 2007 (UTC) 3558:00:51, 13 February 2007 (UTC) 3542:01:51, 10 February 2007 (UTC) 2912:21:44, 23 February 2007 (UTC) 2896:05:28, 21 February 2007 (UTC) 2710:02:03, 28 December 2006 (UTC) 2701:20:04, 27 December 2006 (UTC) 2683:19:53, 27 December 2006 (UTC) 2647:05:33, 13 December 2006 (UTC) 2617:Colbert Nation link is wrong. 2609:04:37, 28 December 2006 (UTC) 2600:01:45, 25 December 2006 (UTC) 2590:20:06, 12 December 2006 (UTC) 2581: 2530:06:26, 11 December 2006 (UTC) 2495:19:15, 10 December 2006 (UTC) 2485:18:22, 10 December 2006 (UTC) 2475:17:33, 10 December 2006 (UTC) 2465:17:16, 10 December 2006 (UTC) 2449:19:15, 10 December 2006 (UTC) 2440:17:31, 10 December 2006 (UTC) 2427:15:49, 10 December 2006 (UTC) 2303:Why don't you just register? 2285:19:44, 19 November 2006 (UTC) 2269:14:01, 15 November 2006 (UTC) 2231:23:26, 14 November 2006 (UTC) 2221:22:13, 13 November 2006 (UTC) 2209:19:14, 13 November 2006 (UTC) 2196:14:26, 13 November 2006 (UTC) 2177:19:29, 12 November 2006 (UTC) 2132:08:49, 11 November 2006 (UTC) 2114:06:07, 10 November 2006 (UTC) 1813:19:30, 10 November 2006 (UTC) 1794:18:11, 10 November 2006 (UTC) 1685:Looking good, and thank you. 747: 719: 677: 495:16:42, 28 February 2007 (UTC) 486:02:23, 28 December 2006 (UTC) 373:Okay, let's give it a go. -- 298:21:19, 11 December 2006 (UTC) 232:Criticisms of Stephen Colbert 3526: 3499:23:11, 5 February 2007 (UTC) 3481:03:37, 1 February 2007 (UTC) 3456:15:27, 31 January 2007 (UTC) 3439:13:00, 31 January 2007 (UTC) 3429:05:47, 31 January 2007 (UTC) 3418:Knowledge in popular culture 3407:05:45, 31 January 2007 (UTC) 3393:01:30, 31 January 2007 (UTC) 3355:22:14, 30 January 2007 (UTC) 3322:21:31, 30 January 2007 (UTC) 3279:21:13, 30 January 2007 (UTC) 3256:19:48, 30 January 2007 (UTC) 3219:16:15, 30 January 2007 (UTC) 3205:16:10, 30 January 2007 (UTC) 3161:12:15, 30 January 2007 (UTC) 3152:11:26, 30 January 2007 (UTC) 3129:04:56, 30 January 2007 (UTC) 3113:04:50, 30 January 2007 (UTC) 3078:05:54, 27 January 2007 (UTC) 3024:19:09, 19 January 2007 (UTC) 3010:19:04, 19 January 2007 (UTC) 2992:18:43, 19 January 2007 (UTC) 2979:16:54, 19 January 2007 (UTC) 2970:06:35, 19 January 2007 (UTC) 2949:13:12, 29 January 2007 (UTC) 2939:01:41, 18 January 2007 (UTC) 2881:01:02, 22 January 2007 (UTC) 2843:11:11, 21 January 2007 (UTC) 2834:10:46, 21 January 2007 (UTC) 2812:14:47, 17 January 2007 (UTC) 2802:04:04, 15 January 2007 (UTC) 2792:02:34, 13 January 2007 (UTC) 2775:03:10, 29 January 2007 (UTC) 2763:16:59, 13 January 2007 (UTC) 2402:04:23, 9 December 2006 (UTC) 2378:18:50, 4 December 2006 (UTC) 2368:18:43, 4 December 2006 (UTC) 2357:22:46, 2 December 2006 (UTC) 2308:06:01, 1 December 2006 (UTC) 2101:08:36, 9 November 2006 (UTC) 2069:00:16, 14 January 2007 (UTC) 2035:06:24, 5 November 2006 (UTC) 2008:06:13, 2 November 2006 (UTC) 1998:21:24, 1 November 2006 (UTC) 1979:18:36, 1 November 2006 (UTC) 1964:21:24, 1 November 2006 (UTC) 1949:05:58, 1 November 2006 (UTC) 1935:02:19, 1 November 2006 (UTC) 1925:22:03, 31 October 2006 (UTC) 1910:21:35, 31 October 2006 (UTC) 1896:22:41, 6 December 2006 (UTC) 1875:14:43, 30 October 2006 (UTC) 1848:01:00, 30 October 2006 (UTC) 1766:16:20, 2 November 2006 (UTC) 1748:08:18, 2 November 2006 (UTC) 1710:19:32, 31 October 2006 (UTC) 1695:19:13, 31 October 2006 (UTC) 1680:16:59, 31 October 2006 (UTC) 1665:19:09, 28 October 2006 (UTC) 1650:10:06, 26 October 2006 (UTC) 1577:07:44, 25 October 2006 (UTC) 1557:02:56, 24 October 2006 (UTC) 1392:05:51, 23 October 2006 (UTC) 1381:00:41, 23 October 2006 (UTC) 1366:23:55, 22 October 2006 (UTC) 1356:23:06, 22 October 2006 (UTC) 1341:21:19, 22 October 2006 (UTC) 1330:21:09, 22 October 2006 (UTC) 1311:20:00, 22 October 2006 (UTC) 1300:19:25, 22 October 2006 (UTC) 1276:01:33, 22 October 2006 (UTC) 1266:01:29, 22 October 2006 (UTC) 1255:01:21, 22 October 2006 (UTC) 1248:Memorable reports include... 1241:01:11, 22 October 2006 (UTC) 1231:01:08, 22 October 2006 (UTC) 1221:00:57, 22 October 2006 (UTC) 1207:00:49, 22 October 2006 (UTC) 1185:18:07, 19 October 2006 (UTC) 1162:17:58, 19 October 2006 (UTC) 1148:17:52, 19 October 2006 (UTC) 1120:17:12, 16 October 2006 (UTC) 1097:07:32, 16 October 2006 (UTC) 1067:03:39, 16 October 2006 (UTC) 1037:02:21, 24 January 2007 (UTC) 1025:00:21, 24 January 2007 (UTC) 1013:01:05, 15 October 2006 (UTC) 992:01:01, 15 October 2006 (UTC) 982:04:09, 12 October 2006 (UTC) 949:00:18, 12 October 2006 (UTC) 940:06:06, 11 October 2006 (UTC) 924:05:59, 11 October 2006 (UTC) 915:16:35, 10 October 2006 (UTC) 905:07:58, 10 October 2006 (UTC) 878:21:42, 31 October 2006 (UTC) 863:21:02, 31 October 2006 (UTC) 830:05:52, 13 October 2006 (UTC) 796:21:10, 31 October 2006 (UTC) 780:05:43, 13 October 2006 (UTC) 765:05:28, 13 October 2006 (UTC) 737:04:04, 13 October 2006 (UTC) 711:04:00, 13 October 2006 (UTC) 695:03:25, 13 October 2006 (UTC) 667:06:26, 19 October 2006 (UTC) 658:03:19, 13 October 2006 (UTC) 638:16:41, 10 October 2006 (UTC) 551:16:41, 10 October 2006 (UTC) 468:22:25, 18 October 2006 (UTC) 458:14:33, 18 October 2006 (UTC) 437:14:03, 18 October 2006 (UTC) 313:06:23, 20 January 2007 (UTC) 273:16:23, 7 December 2006 (UTC) 195:don't, uh, have passports -- 190:23:47, 13 October 2006 (UTC) 151:05:52, 13 October 2006 (UTC) 4323:Colbert's lop-sided ears... 3748:Stephen Colbert (character) 3588:Stephen Colbert (character) 3571:Stephen Colbert (character) 3569:, and would fit more under 3289:Stephen Colbert (character) 3212:Stephen Colbert (character) 2744:12:45, 1 January 2007 (UTC) 2735:07:25, 1 January 2007 (UTC) 2455:Awards & Honors Section 2435:on truthiness covers it. - 977:typo, I suggest correction 958:19:45, 9 January 2007 (UTC) 627:20:23, 9 October 2006 (UTC) 611:01:55, 4 January 2007 (UTC) 601:01:45, 4 January 2007 (UTC) 592:20:22, 3 January 2007 (UTC) 420:17:37, 6 October 2006 (UTC) 410:17:26, 6 October 2006 (UTC) 400:17:21, 6 October 2006 (UTC) 390:04:20, 6 October 2006 (UTC) 378:19:19, 5 October 2006 (UTC) 366:19:17, 5 October 2006 (UTC) 353:15:33, 5 October 2006 (UTC) 343:20:01, 4 October 2006 (UTC) 262:14:46, 1 October 2006 (UTC) 251:14:33, 1 October 2006 (UTC) 4398: 4289:07:16, 27 April 2007 (UTC) 4268:02:18, 25 April 2007 (UTC) 4254:23:25, 23 April 2007 (UTC) 4233:21:13, 24 April 2007 (UTC) 4220:20:37, 24 April 2007 (UTC) 4210:13:41, 24 April 2007 (UTC) 4201:21:18, 23 April 2007 (UTC) 4191:22:31, 22 April 2007 (UTC) 4141:23:25, 21 April 2007 (UTC) 4105:01:20, 19 April 2007 (UTC) 4078:19:53, 18 April 2007 (UTC) 4017:23:44, 17 April 2007 (UTC) 3963:12:52, 11 April 2007 (UTC) 3903:05:50, 29 March 2007 (UTC) 3885:22:53, 20 April 2007 (UTC) 3875:09:22, 18 April 2007 (UTC) 3840:16:15, 28 March 2007 (UTC) 3830:23:37, 27 March 2007 (UTC) 3809:16:48, 19 March 2007 (UTC) 3800:02:04, 19 March 2007 (UTC) 3791:23:05, 18 March 2007 (UTC) 3782:22:43, 18 March 2007 (UTC) 3764:21:33, 18 March 2007 (UTC) 3756:Jerry Seinfeld (character) 3736:16:49, 19 March 2007 (UTC) 3722:07:52, 11 March 2007 (UTC) 3678:09:31, 17 March 2007 (UTC) 3416:{{editprotected}} I think 3304:08:22, 11 March 2007 (UTC) 2987:. Don't ever forget that. 1901:Vandalism and Semi-Protect 1825:Pronunciation of "Colbert" 98:Hungarian citizenship?!?!? 3949:12:50, 5 April 2007 (UTC) 3860:06:08, 4 April 2007 (UTC) 3850:05:57, 4 April 2007 (UTC) 3509:08:30, 1 April 2007 (UTC) 3361:Wrong protection template 1086:New York Magazine article 4382:17:22, 25 May 2007 (UTC) 4371:12:07, 25 May 2007 (UTC) 4343:19:22, 28 May 2007 (UTC) 4332:17:50, 13 May 2007 (UTC) 4055:17:02, 11 May 2007 (UTC) 4048:Greatest Living American 3968:Greatest Living American 3924:, poorly formatted, and 2623:http://colbertnation.com 2341:) 15:55, 2 December 2006 2088:Born in Washington D.C.? 1737:) 13:38, 31 October 2006 202:13:56, 22 May 2007 (UTC) 4318:19:01, 5 May 2007 (UTC) 4042:15:05, 2 May 2007 (UTC) 3990:) 08:00, 17 April 2007. 3821:Republican or Democrat? 3769:Makes sense to me. -- 2570:06:51, 9 May 2007 (UTC) 2053:Colbert University page 1582:GA Renomination on hold 1074:Colbert Nation Bio page 1055:Night of Too Many Stars 953:yes sounds swell to me 212:Response to Peer Review 3365:Please change it from 3093:COLBERT/STEWART 2008! 3056: 2768:Dungeons & Dragons 2756:Dungeons & Dragons 1864: 1412:1. It is well written. 1316:I think that would be 1194:Not "This Week in God" 4127:comment was added by 3978:comment was added by 3242:comment was added by 3099:comment was added by 3049: 2633:comment was added by 2352:it's a fine photo. / 1859: 1785:Elevated to GA status 1403:Good Article Criteria 42:of past discussions. 3912:- From The Economist 3043:rm'ed self-reference 2955:Colbert and Stewart? 1562:Another serious edit 18:Talk:Stephen Colbert 4245:spaces within cites 3713:The term coined by 3563:It's covered under 3272:Stephen Colbert Day 3266:Stephen Colbert Day 1755:I'm so confused... 4361:This is the link: 3958:How tall is he? -- 3908:Last paragraph of 3890:Fluent in Italian? 3566:The Colbert Report 3210:This should be in 3178:Colbert has also: 3068:The Colbert Report 2045:Colbert Wikia site 2014:The Colbert Report 1970:Recurring Segments 1544:The Colbert Report 1236:Is it better now? 788:The Colbert Report 165:Hungarian Rhapsody 4144: 4068:comment added by 3991: 3666:I would add that 3548:Knowledge critic? 3389:Kaustuv CHAUDHURI 3276:Shawn in Montreal 3259: 3116: 2903:this awesome site 2860:this awesome site 2680: 2673: 2669: 2650: 2559: 2545:comment added by 2521: 2507:comment added by 2349:assume good faith 2343: 2329:comment added by 2183:original research 2161: 2147:comment added by 2049:Kerojack, Argenta 2005:Kerojack, Argenta 1976:Kerojack, Argenta 1885:, which states: 1756: 1739: 1725:comment added by 1416:Needs Improvement 1318:original research 1290:, or whatever). 860:Kerojack, Argenta 793:Kerojack, Argenta 763: 735: 693: 200: 95: 94: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 4389: 4282:Shigeru Miyamoto 4178:SC: Absolutely. 4122: 4103: 4088: 4080: 4040: 4025: 4015: 4000: 3973: 3946:My Contributions 3926:not encyclopedic 3779:My Contributions 3539: 3534: 3528: 3391: 3384: 3378: 3374: 3368: 3352: 3301: 3295: 3237: 3094: 2698: 2678: 2671: 2667: 2628: 2587: 2583: 2558: 2539: 2520: 2501: 2342: 2323: 2160: 2141: 2059:. The staff at 2033: 1996: 1962: 1923: 1873: 1764: 1754: 1738: 1719: 1708: 1693: 1575: 1466:reliable sources 1379: 1354: 1328: 1298: 1118: 1065: 876: 778: 753: 751: 725: 723: 709: 683: 681: 656: 483: 196: 188: 73: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 4397: 4396: 4392: 4391: 4390: 4388: 4387: 4386: 4351: 4325: 4311: 4302: 4295:User:Hibbidyhai 4275: 4261: 4247: 4150: 4123:—The preceding 4113: 4094: 4086: 4063: 4031: 4023: 4006: 3998: 3974:—The preceding 3970: 3956: 3954:Stephen Colbert 3914: 3892: 3823: 3744: 3719:Hanswaldenmaier 3715:Stephen Colbert 3711: 3685: 3664: 3636: 3550: 3517: 3488: 3414: 3400: 3386: 3382: 3376: 3372: 3366: 3363: 3350: 3311: 3299: 3293: 3268: 3238:—The preceding 3227: 3176: 3137: 3095:—The preceding 3085: 3045: 3034:User:Hibbidyhai 2957: 2936:Lady Voldything 2919: 2785: 2716:religious sense 2696: 2656: 2629:—The preceding 2619: 2577: 2540: 2502: 2457: 2416: 2324: 2319: 2292: 2277: 2251: 2228:Fairy Incognito 2142: 2129:Fairy Incognito 2098:Fairy Incognito 2090: 2026: 2018:Stephen Colbert 1989: 1986:deletion review 1972: 1955: 1942: 1916: 1903: 1866: 1858:, he clarifies: 1827: 1787: 1757: 1720: 1701: 1686: 1672: 1657: 1584: 1568: 1564: 1510:5. It is stable 1432:The section on 1425:expectation of 1399: 1372: 1347: 1321: 1291: 1196: 1137:The site says: 1130: 1111: 1058: 1051: 989:Fairy Incognito 974: 946:Fairy Incognito 921:Fairy Incognito 902:Fairy Incognito 898: 869: 854:I moderate the 771: 702: 649: 502: 481: 331: 234: 214: 181: 100: 69: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 4395: 4393: 4385: 4384: 4350: 4347: 4346: 4345: 4324: 4321: 4310: 4307: 4301: 4298: 4274: 4271: 4260: 4259:Colbert Nation 4257: 4246: 4243: 4242: 4241: 4240: 4239: 4238: 4237: 4236: 4235: 4184: 4183: 4174: 4173: 4167: 4166: 4160: 4159: 4149: 4146: 4112: 4109: 4108: 4107: 4092: 4070:68.119.222.149 4060: 4059: 4058: 4057: 4029: 4019: 4004: 3969: 3966: 3955: 3952: 3913: 3906: 3891: 3888: 3878: 3877: 3863: 3862: 3843: 3842: 3822: 3819: 3818: 3817: 3816: 3815: 3814: 3813: 3812: 3811: 3752:Jerry Seinfeld 3743: 3740: 3739: 3738: 3710: 3707: 3705: 3703: 3702: 3684: 3681: 3663: 3660: 3658: 3656: 3655: 3640:207.229.164.50 3635: 3632: 3631: 3630: 3629: 3628: 3627: 3626: 3607: 3606: 3605: 3604: 3603: 3602: 3549: 3546: 3545: 3544: 3516: 3513: 3512: 3511: 3487: 3484: 3467:them. Thanks. 3461: 3460: 3459: 3458: 3447:Thanks, Tom. 3442: 3441: 3413: 3412:edit protected 3410: 3399: 3396: 3362: 3359: 3358: 3357: 3325: 3324: 3310: 3307: 3267: 3264: 3262: 3226: 3223: 3222: 3221: 3196: 3195: 3187: 3186: 3183: 3181: 3179: 3175: 3172: 3166: 3165: 3164: 3163: 3147:The great kawa 3136: 3133: 3132: 3131: 3124:The great kawa 3090: 3084: 3081: 3044: 3041: 3029: 3028: 3027: 3026: 3017:Inside Edition 2998: 2997: 2996: 2995: 2994: 2985:Inside Edition 2956: 2953: 2952: 2951: 2931: 2930: 2926: 2925: 2923: 2922: 2918: 2915: 2888: 2887: 2886: 2885: 2884: 2883: 2863: 2850: 2849: 2848: 2847: 2846: 2845: 2822:70.110.107.121 2817: 2816: 2815: 2814: 2799:Tyrone Hunnibi 2784: 2781: 2780: 2779: 2778: 2777: 2752: 2751: 2750: 2749: 2748: 2747: 2746: 2732:172.135.27.151 2655: 2652: 2618: 2615: 2614: 2613: 2612: 2611: 2597:Tyrone Hunnibi 2576: 2573: 2563: 2562: 2561: 2560: 2547:142.151.185.35 2509:142.151.185.35 2498: 2497: 2478: 2477: 2456: 2453: 2452: 2451: 2442: 2415: 2412: 2411: 2410: 2409: 2408: 2407: 2406: 2405: 2404: 2395:Carmen Electra 2360: 2359: 2331:60.240.111.218 2318: 2315: 2311: 2310: 2291: 2288: 2276: 2273: 2272: 2271: 2250: 2247: 2246: 2245: 2244: 2243: 2242: 2241: 2240: 2239: 2238: 2237: 2236: 2235: 2234: 2233: 2137: 2136: 2135: 2134: 2117: 2116: 2089: 2086: 2084: 2078: 2077: 2076: 2075: 2074: 2073: 2072: 2071: 2061:NoFactZone.net 2057:NoFactZone.net 2047:maintained by 1971: 1968: 1967: 1966: 1941: 1938: 1928: 1927: 1902: 1899: 1878: 1877: 1841: 1840: 1826: 1823: 1822: 1821: 1820: 1819: 1818: 1817: 1816: 1815: 1789:So elevated. / 1786: 1783: 1782: 1781: 1780: 1779: 1778: 1777: 1770: 1769: 1768: 1697: 1671: 1668: 1656: 1653: 1642: 1641: 1635: 1629: 1617: 1616: 1615: 1614: 1610: 1607: 1601: 1600: 1594: 1583: 1580: 1563: 1560: 1550: 1548: 1547: 1540:The Daily Show 1526: 1525: 1507: 1506: 1492: 1491: 1477: 1476: 1469: 1452: 1451: 1441: 1430: 1410: 1398: 1395: 1384: 1383: 1359: 1358: 1333: 1332: 1303: 1302: 1269: 1268: 1244: 1243: 1224: 1223: 1195: 1192: 1188: 1187: 1170:night's show. 1167: 1166: 1165: 1164: 1141: 1129: 1126: 1125: 1124: 1123: 1122: 1100: 1099: 1050: 1043: 1042: 1041: 1040: 1039: 1018: 1017: 1016: 1015: 996:Even Stevphen 973: 972:Even Ste---en? 970: 969: 968: 967: 966: 965: 964: 963: 962: 961: 960: 897: 894: 893: 892: 891: 890: 889: 888: 887: 886: 885: 884: 883: 882: 881: 880: 841: 840: 839: 838: 837: 836: 835: 834: 833: 832: 813: 812: 811: 810: 809: 808: 807: 806: 805: 804: 800: 799: 798: 672: 671: 670: 669: 641: 640: 620: 619: 618: 617: 616: 615: 614: 613: 554: 553: 501: 498: 471: 470: 450: 449: 448: 447: 446: 445: 444: 443: 442: 441: 440: 439: 371: 370: 369: 368: 337: 330: 327: 323: 322: 303: 302: 301: 300: 276: 275: 270:71.233.210.230 265: 264: 254: 253: 233: 230: 213: 210: 209: 208: 207: 206: 205: 204: 154: 153: 143: 99: 96: 93: 92: 87: 84: 79: 74: 67: 62: 52: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 4394: 4383: 4380: 4375: 4374: 4373: 4372: 4369: 4365: 4364: 4359: 4355: 4348: 4344: 4341: 4336: 4335: 4334: 4333: 4330: 4320: 4319: 4316: 4315:66.176.255.84 4308: 4306: 4299: 4297: 4296: 4291: 4290: 4287: 4283: 4279: 4278:Time Magazine 4270: 4269: 4266: 4265:Primetimeking 4258: 4256: 4255: 4252: 4244: 4234: 4231: 4227: 4223: 4222: 4221: 4218: 4213: 4212: 4211: 4208: 4204: 4203: 4202: 4199: 4195: 4194: 4193: 4192: 4189: 4182: 4181: 4176: 4175: 4172: 4169: 4168: 4165: 4162: 4161: 4158: 4155: 4154: 4153: 4147: 4145: 4142: 4138: 4134: 4130: 4126: 4119: 4116: 4106: 4102: 4101: 4096: 4095: 4089: 4083: 4082: 4081: 4079: 4075: 4071: 4067: 4056: 4053: 4049: 4045: 4044: 4043: 4039: 4038: 4033: 4032: 4026: 4020: 4018: 4014: 4013: 4008: 4007: 4001: 3994: 3993: 3992: 3989: 3985: 3981: 3980:128.122.89.47 3977: 3967: 3965: 3964: 3961: 3953: 3951: 3950: 3947: 3943: 3939: 3935: 3931: 3927: 3923: 3919: 3911: 3907: 3905: 3904: 3901: 3900:Geral Corasjo 3896: 3889: 3887: 3886: 3883: 3876: 3873: 3868: 3867: 3866: 3861: 3858: 3854: 3853: 3852: 3851: 3848: 3847:75.73.121.145 3841: 3838: 3834: 3833: 3832: 3831: 3828: 3820: 3810: 3807: 3803: 3802: 3801: 3798: 3794: 3793: 3792: 3789: 3785: 3784: 3783: 3780: 3776: 3772: 3768: 3767: 3766: 3765: 3762: 3757: 3753: 3749: 3741: 3737: 3734: 3730: 3726: 3725: 3724: 3723: 3720: 3716: 3709:The Grand War 3708: 3706: 3701: 3698: 3694: 3693: 3692: 3690: 3682: 3680: 3679: 3676: 3671: 3669: 3668:Dan Bakkedahl 3661: 3659: 3654: 3651: 3647: 3646: 3645: 3644: 3641: 3633: 3625: 3622: 3618: 3613: 3612: 3611: 3610: 3609: 3608: 3599: 3598: 3597: 3594: 3589: 3585: 3584: 3583: 3580: 3576: 3572: 3568: 3567: 3562: 3561: 3560: 3559: 3556: 3547: 3543: 3540: 3535: 3530: 3529: 3523:Yes. Idiot. — 3522: 3521: 3520: 3514: 3510: 3507: 3503: 3502: 3501: 3500: 3497: 3493: 3485: 3483: 3482: 3478: 3474: 3470: 3466: 3457: 3453: 3450: 3446: 3445: 3444: 3443: 3440: 3437: 3433: 3432: 3431: 3430: 3426: 3423: 3419: 3411: 3409: 3408: 3405: 3397: 3395: 3394: 3390: 3381: 3371: 3360: 3356: 3353: 3348: 3347: 3342: 3338: 3334: 3333: 3332: 3330: 3323: 3320: 3316: 3315: 3314: 3308: 3306: 3305: 3302: 3296: 3294:CharacterZero 3290: 3285: 3281: 3280: 3277: 3273: 3265: 3263: 3260: 3257: 3253: 3249: 3245: 3241: 3234: 3231: 3224: 3220: 3217: 3213: 3209: 3208: 3207: 3206: 3203: 3199: 3194: 3190: 3189: 3188: 3173: 3171: 3170: 3162: 3159: 3155: 3154: 3153: 3150: 3149: 3148: 3142: 3141: 3140: 3134: 3130: 3127: 3126: 3125: 3119: 3118: 3117: 3114: 3110: 3106: 3102: 3098: 3088: 3082: 3080: 3079: 3076: 3074: 3069: 3064: 3062: 3055: 3054: 3048: 3040: 3036: 3035: 3025: 3022: 3018: 3013: 3012: 3011: 3008: 3003: 2999: 2993: 2990: 2986: 2982: 2981: 2980: 2977: 2973: 2972: 2971: 2968: 2963: 2962: 2961: 2954: 2950: 2947: 2943: 2942: 2941: 2940: 2937: 2932: 2927: 2916: 2914: 2913: 2910: 2908: 2904: 2898: 2897: 2894: 2893:Typing monkey 2882: 2879: 2877: 2873: 2872:about Colbert 2869: 2864: 2861: 2856: 2855: 2854: 2853: 2852: 2851: 2844: 2841: 2837: 2836: 2835: 2832: 2831:Typing monkey 2828: 2827: 2826: 2825: 2824: 2823: 2813: 2810: 2809:Typing monkey 2805: 2804: 2803: 2800: 2796: 2795: 2794: 2793: 2790: 2789:Typing monkey 2783:tekjansen.com 2782: 2776: 2773: 2769: 2766: 2765: 2764: 2761: 2757: 2753: 2745: 2742: 2738: 2737: 2736: 2733: 2729: 2725: 2721: 2717: 2713: 2712: 2711: 2708: 2704: 2703: 2702: 2699: 2694: 2693: 2687: 2686: 2685: 2684: 2681: 2677: 2666: 2661: 2653: 2651: 2648: 2644: 2640: 2636: 2632: 2625: 2624: 2616: 2610: 2607: 2603: 2602: 2601: 2598: 2594: 2593: 2592: 2591: 2588: 2584: 2574: 2572: 2571: 2568: 2556: 2552: 2548: 2544: 2537: 2533: 2532: 2531: 2528: 2524: 2523: 2522: 2518: 2514: 2510: 2506: 2496: 2493: 2489: 2488: 2487: 2486: 2483: 2476: 2473: 2469: 2468: 2467: 2466: 2463: 2454: 2450: 2447: 2443: 2441: 2438: 2434: 2431: 2430: 2429: 2428: 2425: 2421: 2413: 2403: 2400: 2396: 2392: 2388: 2387: 2386: 2381: 2380: 2379: 2376: 2371: 2370: 2369: 2366: 2362: 2361: 2358: 2355: 2350: 2346: 2345: 2344: 2340: 2336: 2332: 2328: 2316: 2314: 2309: 2306: 2302: 2301: 2300: 2298: 2289: 2287: 2286: 2283: 2282:75.22.226.144 2274: 2270: 2267: 2265: 2261: 2260: 2259: 2257: 2232: 2229: 2224: 2223: 2222: 2219: 2217: 2212: 2211: 2210: 2207: 2202: 2199: 2198: 2197: 2194: 2192: 2188: 2184: 2180: 2179: 2178: 2175: 2173: 2168: 2167: 2166: 2165: 2164: 2163: 2162: 2158: 2154: 2150: 2146: 2133: 2130: 2126: 2121: 2120: 2119: 2118: 2115: 2112: 2110: 2105: 2104: 2103: 2102: 2099: 2095: 2087: 2085: 2082: 2070: 2067: 2062: 2058: 2054: 2050: 2046: 2042: 2038: 2037: 2036: 2032: 2030: 2023: 2019: 2015: 2011: 2010: 2009: 2006: 2001: 2000: 1999: 1995: 1993: 1987: 1983: 1982: 1981: 1980: 1977: 1969: 1965: 1961: 1959: 1953: 1952: 1951: 1950: 1947: 1939: 1937: 1936: 1933: 1926: 1922: 1920: 1914: 1913: 1912: 1911: 1908: 1900: 1898: 1897: 1894: 1889: 1886: 1884: 1876: 1872: 1870: 1863: 1857: 1852: 1851: 1850: 1849: 1846: 1838: 1837: 1836: 1835: 1832: 1824: 1814: 1811: 1809: 1804: 1803: 1802: 1801: 1800: 1799: 1798: 1797: 1796: 1795: 1792: 1784: 1776: 1771: 1767: 1763: 1761: 1751: 1750: 1749: 1746: 1741: 1740: 1736: 1732: 1728: 1724: 1717: 1713: 1712: 1711: 1707: 1705: 1698: 1696: 1692: 1690: 1684: 1683: 1682: 1681: 1678: 1669: 1667: 1666: 1663: 1654: 1652: 1651: 1648: 1639: 1636: 1633: 1630: 1626: 1622: 1619: 1618: 1611: 1608: 1605: 1604: 1603: 1602: 1598: 1595: 1592: 1589: 1588: 1587: 1581: 1579: 1578: 1574: 1572: 1561: 1559: 1558: 1555: 1545: 1541: 1537: 1536: 1535: 1534: 1530: 1523: 1518: 1517: 1516: 1515: 1511: 1503: 1502: 1501: 1500: 1496: 1488: 1487: 1486: 1485: 1481: 1474: 1470: 1467: 1463: 1462: 1461: 1460: 1456: 1450: 1446: 1445:Personal Life 1442: 1439: 1435: 1431: 1428: 1424: 1420: 1419: 1418: 1417: 1413: 1408: 1404: 1397:GA De-listing 1396: 1394: 1393: 1390: 1382: 1378: 1376: 1370: 1369: 1368: 1367: 1364: 1357: 1353: 1351: 1345: 1344: 1343: 1342: 1339: 1331: 1327: 1325: 1319: 1315: 1314: 1313: 1312: 1309: 1301: 1297: 1295: 1289: 1285: 1280: 1279: 1278: 1277: 1274: 1267: 1264: 1259: 1258: 1257: 1256: 1253: 1249: 1242: 1239: 1235: 1234: 1233: 1232: 1229: 1222: 1219: 1215: 1211: 1210: 1209: 1208: 1205: 1201: 1193: 1191: 1186: 1183: 1182: 1178: 1173: 1172: 1171: 1163: 1160: 1159: 1155: 1151: 1150: 1149: 1146: 1142: 1140: 1136: 1135: 1134: 1127: 1121: 1117: 1115: 1109: 1104: 1103: 1102: 1101: 1098: 1095: 1091: 1090:County_Tyrone 1087: 1083: 1079: 1075: 1071: 1070: 1069: 1068: 1064: 1062: 1056: 1048: 1044: 1038: 1035: 1031: 1030: 1029: 1028: 1027: 1026: 1023: 1022:143.167.233.7 1014: 1011: 1007: 1004: 1001: 998: 995: 994: 993: 990: 986: 985: 984: 983: 980: 971: 959: 956: 952: 951: 950: 947: 943: 942: 941: 938: 934: 931: 930:72.19.108.119 927: 926: 925: 922: 918: 917: 916: 913: 912:149.10.148.44 909: 908: 907: 906: 903: 895: 879: 875: 873: 866: 865: 864: 861: 857: 853: 852: 851: 850: 849: 848: 847: 846: 845: 844: 843: 842: 831: 828: 823: 822: 821: 820: 819: 818: 817: 816: 815: 814: 801: 797: 794: 790: 789: 783: 782: 781: 777: 775: 768: 767: 766: 761: 757: 752: 750: 743: 742: 740: 739: 738: 733: 729: 724: 722: 714: 713: 712: 708: 706: 699: 698: 697: 696: 691: 687: 682: 680: 668: 665: 661: 660: 659: 655: 653: 646: 643: 642: 639: 636: 631: 630: 629: 628: 625: 612: 609: 608:Typing monkey 604: 603: 602: 599: 595: 594: 593: 590: 589:Typing monkey 586: 582: 578: 574: 570: 566: 562: 558: 557: 556: 555: 552: 549: 545: 542: 539: 538: 537: 535: 531: 528: 525: 521: 517: 514: 511: 507: 499: 497: 496: 493: 488: 487: 484: 479: 478: 469: 466: 462: 461: 460: 459: 456: 438: 435: 431: 427: 423: 422: 421: 418: 413: 412: 411: 408: 403: 402: 401: 398: 393: 392: 391: 388: 384: 383: 382: 381: 380: 379: 376: 367: 364: 360: 356: 355: 354: 351: 347: 346: 345: 344: 341: 335: 328: 326: 321: 317: 316: 315: 314: 311: 307: 299: 296: 292: 288: 284: 280: 279: 278: 277: 274: 271: 267: 266: 263: 260: 256: 255: 252: 249: 244: 239: 238: 237: 231: 229: 228: 225: 221: 218: 211: 203: 199: 198:Phoeba Wright 193: 192: 191: 187: 185: 178: 177: 176: 175: 174: 173: 170: 166: 162: 157: 152: 149: 144: 142: 139: 135: 134: 133: 132: 129: 123: 122: 119: 118:Phantasmbunny 115: 109: 108: 105: 97: 91: 88: 85: 83: 80: 78: 75: 72: 68: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 4366: 4360: 4356: 4352: 4326: 4312: 4303: 4292: 4286:Franck Drake 4276: 4262: 4248: 4225: 4185: 4179: 4177: 4170: 4163: 4156: 4151: 4120: 4117: 4114: 4098: 4090: 4064:— Preceding 4061: 4035: 4027: 4010: 4002: 3996:opinions. -- 3971: 3957: 3942:Chat with me 3918:this section 3915: 3910:this section 3897: 3893: 3879: 3864: 3844: 3827:70.149.79.61 3824: 3775:Chat with me 3745: 3712: 3704: 3686: 3675:70.5.166.167 3672: 3665: 3657: 3637: 3574: 3564: 3551: 3525: 3518: 3489: 3462: 3436:Tom Harrison 3415: 3401: 3398:Reality Page 3364: 3345: 3326: 3312: 3309:Wikilobbying 3286: 3282: 3269: 3261: 3244:Nathanduclos 3235: 3232: 3228: 3200: 3197: 3177: 3167: 3146: 3144: 3138: 3123: 3121: 3089: 3086: 3065: 3060: 3057: 3051: 3050: 3046: 3037: 3030: 3016: 3001: 2984: 2958: 2933: 2928: 2920: 2899: 2889: 2871: 2867: 2818: 2786: 2720:ethnic sense 2719: 2718:, but in an 2715: 2691: 2675: 2664: 2659: 2657: 2626: 2620: 2578: 2564: 2499: 2479: 2458: 2417: 2390: 2320: 2312: 2293: 2278: 2252: 2186: 2138: 2124: 2091: 2083: 2079: 2016:moreso than 1973: 1943: 1929: 1904: 1890: 1887: 1879: 1860: 1842: 1830: 1828: 1788: 1673: 1658: 1643: 1637: 1631: 1620: 1596: 1590: 1585: 1565: 1552:contact me. 1549: 1543: 1539: 1532: 1528: 1527: 1522:two versions 1513: 1509: 1508: 1498: 1494: 1493: 1483: 1479: 1478: 1472: 1458: 1454: 1453: 1448: 1444: 1438:Early Career 1437: 1433: 1415: 1411: 1400: 1385: 1360: 1334: 1304: 1284:Verifability 1273:4.253.28.225 1270: 1252:4.253.28.225 1247: 1245: 1228:4.253.28.225 1225: 1213: 1204:4.253.28.225 1197: 1189: 1180: 1168: 1157: 1138: 1131: 1107: 1054: 1052: 1046: 1019: 975: 955:Dappled Sage 899: 786: 748: 720: 678: 673: 664:24.149.49.73 621: 526: 512: 503: 489: 476: 472: 451: 429: 372: 359:User:No Guru 336: 332: 324: 304: 286: 282: 235: 222: 219: 215: 169:K. Lastochka 161:Ferenc Liszt 158: 155: 138:24.149.49.73 128:K. Lastochka 124: 110: 104:K. Lastochka 101: 70: 43: 37: 4052:Goodolclint 3284:his day on 3191:Reference: 3083:put this in 2868:informative 2840:EnsRedShirt 2541:—Preceding 2503:—Preceding 2325:—Preceding 2149:71.57.95.94 2143:—Preceding 2064:Knowledge. 1721:—Preceding 1597:Copyediting 1473:Other Roles 1434:Other Roles 1288:Attribution 577:unnecessary 571:and assume 465:Blackjack48 434:Blackjack48 36:This is an 4368:Wadester16 4230:Larry Dunn 4207:Larry Dunn 4188:Larry Dunn 3960:myselfalso 3938:Whereizben 3930:Asabanuevo 3771:Whereizben 3515:Tyrone?!?! 3370:sprotected 3032:laughing. 2976:MrBlondNYC 2724:Crypto-Jew 2707:MrBlondNYC 2635:Bamboozler 2621:It's just 2305:MGlosenger 2066:Nofactzone 1954:done. :-) 1727:Lee Bailey 1670:Followup 2 1655:Followup 1 1591:References 1094:Nofactzone 1034:MrBlondNYC 635:Snarkivist 573:good faith 561:accusation 548:Snarkivist 520:Snarkivist 506:Nofactzone 492:Whereizben 340:Leotolstoy 257:Seconded. 146:Colber(t). 3934:talk page 3922:unsourced 3857:GTBacchus 3380:protected 3341:Knowledge 3337:neologism 3329:Microsoft 3047:Removed: 3021:Wahkeenah 2989:Wahkeenah 2967:Wahkeenah 2929:Thoughts? 2917:Vandalism 2654:Catholic? 2567:Brendan19 2424:Brownings 2399:Wahkeenah 2275:Citation? 1484:Weak Pass 1447:sections 1177:Clockwork 1154:Clockwork 1128:Wikiality 746:A Man In 718:A Man In 676:A Man In 428:article. 426:RuneScape 295:Binabik80 259:Nerdlogic 224:Ramsquire 90:Archive 7 82:Archive 5 77:Archive 4 71:Archive 3 65:Archive 2 60:Archive 1 4309:Religion 4137:contribs 4129:SpikeDog 4125:unsigned 4066:unsigned 3988:contribs 3976:unsigned 3579:Viewdrix 3527:bbatsell 3346:bbatsell 3319:Chivista 3252:contribs 3240:unsigned 3109:contribs 3097:unsigned 3007:Viewdrix 2760:Boss1000 2741:Asarelah 2726:, or a " 2692:bbatsell 2643:contribs 2631:unsigned 2606:Blaxthos 2555:contribs 2543:unsigned 2527:Blaxthos 2517:contribs 2505:unsigned 2492:Boss1000 2482:Blaxthos 2472:Boss1000 2462:Blaxthos 2446:Boss1000 2437:Boss1000 2354:Blaxthos 2339:contribs 2327:unsigned 2206:Blaxthos 2157:contribs 2145:unsigned 1907:Blaxthos 1791:Blaxthos 1775:Blaxthos 1745:Blaxthos 1735:contribs 1723:unsigned 1677:Blaxthos 1662:Blaxthos 1647:Blaxthos 1613:Sebben". 1569:-- (Lee) 1373:-- (Lee) 1348:-- (Lee) 1322:-- (Lee) 1292:-- (Lee) 1112:-- (Lee) 1082:NNBD.com 1078:IMDB.com 1059:-- (Lee) 1049:Colbert? 1045:Stephen 868:Nation. 856:Colboard 772:-- (Lee) 760:past ops 756:conspire 732:past ops 728:conspire 703:-- (Lee) 690:past ops 686:conspire 650:-- (Lee) 598:Blaxthos 530:contribs 516:contribs 477:bbatsell 407:Twintone 387:Twintone 350:Twintone 320:Blaxthos 310:OPen2737 182:-- (Lee) 4217:Voretus 4198:Voretus 3837:Voretus 3731:first. 3465:WP:WARN 3449:Bubba73 3422:Bubba73 3335:It's a 3225:Reality 3101:Amann32 3019:stuff. 3002:Colbert 2772:nut-meg 2728:Marrano 2582:Voretus 2575:Peabody 2187:grew up 1946:Denstat 1833:article 1427:WP:LEAD 1407:GA list 979:TheHYPO 417:No Guru 375:No Guru 334:world. 243:WP:NPOV 39:archive 4340:Kshieh 4329:Starks 4251:Lexein 3882:Wilson 3872:Kshieh 3806:dposse 3761:spirit 3742:Merge? 3733:dposse 3697:dposse 3506:Kshieh 3452:(talk) 3425:(talk) 3202:Dafdaf 3073:Bailey 2946:Renice 2907:Bailey 2876:Bailey 2397:page. 2264:Bailey 2216:Bailey 2191:Bailey 2172:Bailey 2109:Bailey 2029:Bailey 1992:Bailey 1958:Bailey 1932:Ambero 1919:Bailey 1893:Ratufa 1869:Bailey 1808:Bailey 1760:Bailey 1718:count? 1704:Bailey 1689:Bailey 1571:Bailey 1423:WP:MOS 1389:Ambero 1375:Bailey 1363:Ambero 1350:Bailey 1338:Ambero 1324:Bailey 1308:Ambero 1294:Bailey 1114:Bailey 1108:Report 1061:Bailey 896:Mensa? 872:Bailey 827:Loiosh 774:Bailey 705:Bailey 652:Bailey 405:way.-- 291:WP:NOR 184:Bailey 159:It is 148:Loiosh 4379:Gdo01 4046:Well 3788:Matan 3650:Gdo01 3593:Vidor 3555:Vidor 3496:Jaibe 3477:email 3469:Xiner 3300:Speak 3216:Gdo01 3158:Irfan 2660:plays 2375:Gdo01 2201:WP:OR 2140:from. 2022:WP:EL 1845:Tim D 1638:Scope 1505:that. 1263:Gdo01 1238:Gdo01 1218:Gdo01 1145:Tim D 1010:Gdo01 937:Gdo01 749:Bl♟ck 721:Bl♟ck 679:Bl♟ck 645:WP:EP 624:wangi 569:civil 283:other 16:< 4300:Book 4133:talk 4074:talk 3984:talk 3754:and 3729:WP:N 3621:Talk 3617:Vary 3575:show 3473:talk 3248:talk 3105:talk 2668:RAZY 2639:talk 2551:talk 2513:talk 2391:that 2385:UBeR 2335:talk 2153:talk 1831:Time 1731:talk 1716:here 1628:mix. 1625:NPOV 1621:NPOV 1554:Agne 1542:and 1533:Pass 1514:Pass 1499:Pass 1459:Pass 1286:(or 1181:Soul 1158:Soul 1080:and 1047:What 524:talk 510:talk 287:then 4226:not 3928:. 3375:to 3092:--> 3061:lot 2679:ANE 2365:VxP 2125:was 2055:at 2027:-- 1990:-- 1956:-- 1917:-- 1867:-- 1758:-- 1702:-- 1687:-- 1214:all 870:-- 518:), 293:. 163:'s 114:híd 4338:-- 4139:) 4135:• 4076:) 3986:• 3944:- 3940:- 3870:-- 3797:TM 3777:- 3773:- 3619:| 3533:¿? 3494:-- 3479:) 3475:, 3454:, 3427:, 3404:VX 3387:— 3385:. 3383:}} 3377:{{ 3373:}} 3367:{{ 3351:¿? 3297:| 3254:) 3250:• 3111:) 3107:• 2934:-- 2697:¿? 2674:)` 2672:lN 2670:`( 2645:) 2641:• 2557:) 2553:• 2519:) 2515:• 2337:• 2159:) 2155:• 1733:• 1632:OR 1531:- 1512:- 1497:- 1482:- 1457:- 1414:- 1202:-- 758:| 730:| 688:| 536:. 482:¿? 455:TM 397:TM 363:TM 248:TM 86:→ 4143:. 4131:( 4100:B 4093:x 4087:6 4072:( 4037:B 4030:x 4024:6 4012:B 4005:x 3999:6 3982:( 3538:✍ 3471:( 3258:. 3246:( 3115:. 3103:( 2676:S 2665:C 2649:. 2637:( 2549:( 2511:( 2460:/ 2333:( 2204:/ 2151:( 1773:/ 1729:( 1524:) 762:) 754:( 734:) 726:( 692:) 684:( 527:· 522:( 513:· 508:( 474:— 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index