625:
604:
1585:"The goal of both SALT I and SALT II was to create a set of policies that would gradually evolve through revisions and adjustments. The initial policies set forth in SALT I would gradually change according to current situations, and policymakers would be able to more easily adjust to new rules and regulations. Additionally, incrementalism in policymaking, and therefore treaty making, allows for there to be similarity and consistency between multiple iterations of the same plan. This consistency helps ensure that both sides of the treaty are on the same page and that their relationships with one another would not become strained."
428:
74:
53:
412:
493:
472:
396:
635:
503:
444:
380:
1639:
1596:
1574:
1552:
1530:
1508:
1486:
1464:
1442:
1420:
1398:
1376:
1354:
938:
733:
249:
1365:"The second verification method was confirming that the Multiple Independently Targetable Re-Entry Vehicle (MIRV) limits were being adhered to. Both the United States and the Soviet Union agreed that if a missile had been tested using MIRVs, then it would be presumed that every missile of that type would be equipped with MIRVs, even if they had been tested previously using non-MIRV methods ."
819:
709:
364:
22:
310:
299:
288:
1370:"...The agreement sets forth a set of MIRV counting rules which provide that: (a) all missiles of a type that has been tested with MIRV's shall be counted as MIRV’ed, even if they are deployed with single RV's, and (b) all launchers of a type that has contained or launched MIRV’ed missiles will be counted as MIRV’ed, even if they contain non-MIRV'ed missiles."
189:
142:
321:
277:
1348:"To insure that the United States will be able by its own means to verify Soviet compliance with the terms of SALT II...the treaty explicitly states that verification will be by “national technical means” belonging to the other side. National technical means include satellites (such as photoreconnaissance satellites)"
1392:"....The joint statement of principles and basic guidelines for subsequent negotiations, which declares that the two sides have agreed to work for further reductions and for further qualitative limitations on their strategic forces and to attempt to resolve the issues included in the protocol to the treaty."
1852:
The rephrased statement only mentions "SALT" and does not specify which one it violates, shown as SALT I in the source. The year that the
Soviets were forecast to reach 400 Backfire bombers was 1985, not 1988 as shown in the rephrase. Even if these elements were corrected, this statement would not be
1632:
United States. Department of State. Office of Public
Communication. The Strategic Arms Limitation Talks. Washington: Dept. of State, Bureau of Public Affairs, Office of Public Communication : for Sale by the Supt. of Docs., U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1978. Print. Department of State Publication. General
1243:
Within the past 40 years, it have been both ´dictators´ and ´water monopolistic´ theologists whom have proposed complete nuclear disarmament. These same individuals also push for internal enslavement within their own nations, under their own ´one god´ principle (supremist fascism orientations), which
2003:
SALT II: An
Interim Assessment: Report of the Panel on the Strategic Arms Limitation Talks and the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty on the Intelligence and Military Application of Nuclear Energy Subcommittee of the Committee of Armed Services, House of Representatives, with Dissenting and Supplementary
1480:"the Backfire in the aggregate total would mean that the Soviets by 1985 (if they do not increase present production rates) could have a force of some 400 Backfires deployed. Those 400 Soviet Backfires would be above and beyond the total aggregates of ICBM's, SLBM's, and bombers permitted by SALT I."
1255:
Increasing disarmament talks is a very, very, very bad idea, a NONE deterant to any individual with a ´I´m now master of the
Universe principle¨. These days, that is defacto the ´United States of North America´ itself, and has been since the retraction of Russian sponsored forces in Eastern Europe.
1251:
There is an interesting aspect to this, if you are of that thought and mind, and that aspect is: ´where would you run too, too whom would you run, if there was a severity of abuse under a complete disarmament?´. There is very little doubt that that would be to someone whom could counter, but such an
1196:
SALT I is the common name for the
Strategic Arms Limitation Talks Agreement, also known as Strategic Arms Limitation Treaty. SALT I froze the number of strategic ballistic missile launchers at existing levels, and provided for the addition of new submarine-launched ballistic missile (SLBM) launchers
1650:
Any editor wishing to dispute this proposal is invited to address the issues I've raised here on the talk page. If there are no dissenting opinions, it is my intention to delete the entries within 7 days. Editors wishing to dispute this removal after the fact are free to begin a new discussion here
1310:
I propose that a substantial amount of information added to the article after April 15th, 2017 be removed. The chart below contains the entries where I believe removal is warranted. Please note that the individual reasons for each entry removal are noted in the Notes section under lowercase letters
1247:
To mention a few: Middle East Islam Sects, African
Dictators, South American social communist. All these want ´walk-in´ rights without there being any potencial of any opposition to those demands, and overal have gone out of their way to not allow the use of guns by citizens, and that last, on pure
1731:
As one editor has pointed out to me, almost the entirety of the information I'm seeking to have removed was placed in the article by two editors whose user accounts (and the edits made under them) were created as part of a class assignment — a class which ended May 2017 — and in all liklihood the
2101:
It establishes a sort of framework for stabilizing the adversary relationship between the United States and the Soviet Union. There's also a symbolic importance to the Basic
Principles Agreement. It's very existence as a document suggests that the United States is willing to recognize the Soviet
1919:
The first sentence of this passage from the
Knowledge (XXG) text makes the claim that the goal of SALT I and II was to create "incrementalism". However, the source makes it plain that incrementalism was the means to achieving policy, illustrated by Wildavsky and Charles Lindblom with statistical
903:"The combination of these factors meant that the military and political leadership on both sides had an incentive to reduce their arsenals. Factoring in the industrial complex, if the talks led to allowances for fewer but more advanced systems, this would allow for further expenditures and
1436:"The deployment of ground-launched and sea-launched cruise missiles is limited to cruise missiles not capable of a range of more than 600 kilometers, or about 350 miles. The flight-testing and deployment of air-to-surface ballistic missiles (ASBMs) with ranges over 600 km are banned. "
1920:
support for the concept provided by
Rickhard Hofferbert, John Urice and Andrew Cowart. In the second part of the Knowledge (XXG) text, the editor attempts to link incrementalism to "treaty making" which is a claim made solely by the source's author. Including that claim here violates
1546:"The Senate had even passed a resolution indicating that the US should continue to support SALT II provisions. In the absence of any alternatives, the administration used adherence to SALT II as a symbolic means of demonstrating good faith and preventing an erosion of support."
1387:"This third element, the "Joint Statement of Principles" was to accomplish three main goals: further reduction of available strategic arms, further qualitative limitations on these strategic arms, and finally to resolve the issues in the Protocol of the SALT agreements."
435:
387:
168:
156:
1475:"The U.S. panel stated that if there was a failure to include them in the total, it could potentially lead the Soviets, at the rate of their production, to have approximately 400 Backfire bombers by 1988, therefore exceeding the limitations set by the SALT agreement."
1343:"In order to confirm that the both the United States and the Soviet Union were in compliance with all provisions set in the SALT II agreement, both countries used NTM, or National Technical Means of verification, which included photo-reconnaissance satellites."
1910:. This is identical phrasing. Also, "advanced future arms control plans" is too conceptually odd to be a proper rephrase of "broader arms control measures" by confusing that which is more "advanced" with that which is "broader" (e.g., more wide-ranging).
1590:"The process by which policy evolves through small, gradual deviations from existing standards and practices. Rather than reconstruct policy anew at each interval, decision makers rely on past actions, making only slight adjustments as they go along."
1001:
The photo of
Brezhnev and Ford signing a comunique is misleading, it suggests that Ford signed the SALT1 treaty when it was actually Nixon becuase it was signed two years before Ford became president. Also the T in SALT stands for Treaty not Talks.
419:
164:
451:
172:
2093:
The first, and the one which attracts least attention in the United States, is the so-called Basic Principles Agreement. What the Basic Principles Agreement does is to lay down a basic sort of code of conduct for the waging of the Cold War.
942:
1431:"Additionally, the Protocol banned the deployment of long range cruise missiles on ground and sea based launchers. Finally, the Protocol banned the flight-testing and deployment of air-to-surface ballistic missiles (ASBMs)."
2211:
2181:
1941:
article distinctly labeled it as originating from a separate source. Accordingly, as the revised version is not listed as the official source of record, there is no obligation to use it to find information attributed
371:
152:
2216:
2186:
2097:
It commits the powers you know to do a bunch of mundane things -- like notifying each other about military maneuvers such that military maneuvers cannot be misunderstood, misconstrued, as offensive escalatory moves.
1888:
The source states that the Senate had indicated its support, however in the rephrase this has been altered to suggest that Reagan is attempting to appease Congress (which the Senate is a part of). Appeasement is the
981:
I wonder if this should be included or merits inclusion on a separate page. SALT is the most visible of the treaties, so I can see its utility as a portal of sorts, but still... Deleting CIA coverup reference :)
2077:
This laid down some important rules for the conduct of nuclear warfare. The USA and the USSR pledged 'to do their utmost to avoid military confrontation' and 'to exercise restraint' in international relations.
1409:"...agreement on banning the deployment of mobile ICBM launchers and flight-testing of those ICBMs from launchers. Development of these systems was permitted though, as long as there was no deployment action."
1541:"When Reagan came into office, there was not a better solution than SALT II that could be immediately implemented, so he and his administration decided to follow its guidelines in order to appease Congress."
1239:
A is important, because it limits the potencial of a Walk-IN. B is important, because it limits any internal putz that would lead to a Water Monopoly Incest cycle, by providing alternate external solutions.
2266:
2201:
403:
160:
2221:
2206:
2226:
2000:
House Committee on Armed Services; Intelligence Military Application of Nuclear Energy Subcommittee; Panel on the Strategic Arms Limitation Talks and the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty (1978).
2241:
1248:
humanitarian grounds that have no humanitarian reasoning except that humanitarianism where a ´walk-in´ could be shot. (IE: Humanitarianism for the crook or dictator, but for none other).
533:
1787:
article does not sufficiently understand the information taken from the source. The source says that all missiles of a type that have been tested with MIRV's shall be counted as MIRV’ed
1414:"The deployment of mobile ICBM launchers and the flight-testing of ICBM's from such launchers are banned. Development and testing of the launchers alone, however, are not restricted."
1502:"Perhaps the most important is the minimal constraints associated with continued compliance. Adhering to SALT II would not disturb any US plans for modernizing its weapons systems."
550:
1937:
located). This revised version could have been used to verify the additional claims referenced by the unrevised version. However, the editors who placed the information in the
262:
239:
201:
1862:
The reprase mentions "not very many constraints for weapon systems development", however in the source these "not very many" constraints are linked to "continued compliance."
797:
1453:"The first objective of the two SALT agreements was to permit the United States and the Soviet Union to be essentially equivalent in their arsenal of strategic forces."
586:
1701:
Thank you for adding this information. I've updated the tables to reflect my evaluation of the information taken from this source and rephrased for the wiki article.
1497:"Not very many constraints for weapon systems development detailed in the plan. This allowed the United States to continue testing and developing new weapon systems."
691:
248:
2321:
2306:
2296:
2286:
2276:
2171:
1978:. Washington, DC: Department of State Publication, General Foreign Policy Service. Distributed by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office.
787:
2236:
2176:
2166:
576:
229:
540:
2256:
681:
2271:
1024:
Sentence II is wrong. "T" in SALT = Talks. "T" in START = Treaty. Check the links below the article with the text source of the SALT agreements on state.gov
773:
1652:
749:
124:
2341:
2336:
2316:
2301:
2291:
2281:
2246:
2083:
545:
2331:
2326:
2311:
2261:
657:
2156:
958:
114:
196:
147:
1933:
This source has not been located. This is essentially an unrevised 1978 version of the same information provided by the revised 1979 version (which
2231:
740:
714:
1236:
A) Defense, self-defense (guns). B) Inhibiting a water monopoly society from using enslavement principles while maintaining their own arsenals.
2251:
2191:
516:
477:
90:
2196:
2161:
1732:
editors involved won't be returning to defend their additions. In light of this, my previously specified wait period of 7-days is abrogated.
205:
648:
609:
1263:
1152:
917:
1563:"His goal was to continually strengthen the regulations proposed in SALT I and push forward into more advanced future arms control plans."
1009:
830:
2151:
1216:
You're wrong. "L" in SALT = Limitation = freezing the number of weapons. "R" in START = Reduction = decreasing the number of weapons.
528:
2067:
1177:
1098:
1921:
81:
58:
1795:
MIRV'ed methods of testing (whatever this may be) has nothing to do with denied exemptions for missiles deployed with single RV's.
524:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
1938:
1831:
1818:
1805:
1784:
624:
603:
33:
941:
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available
1924:. In any event, the over-explanation of incrementalism seems outside the scope of an article on strategic arms limitations.
900:
We should be careful when suggesting that the influence of defense contractors was essential to decision making at SALT:
1568:"the answer is to strengthen our grip and keep climbing... . to prepare the ground for broader arms control measures."
1197:
only after the same number of older intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) and SLBM launchers had been dismantled.
1607:
In addition to what was removed above, information added under this specific reference was also removed, as it was
1875:
and implementation, while the source speaks of a numerical ceiling, in other words, a restraint on how many are
1148:
1122:
987:
921:
656:(USSR) on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1267:
39:
1013:
427:
200:. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
1680:
1259:
1173:
1165:
1140:
1102:
1094:
1005:
913:
1067:
411:
73:
52:
1144:
1295:
870:
858:
850:
842:
748:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
89:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1287:
1169:
2132:
2113:
2001:
508:
2066:
The article doesn't mention the term "Basic Principles Agreement" which I do see mentioned from the
21:
1740:
1709:
1666:
1118:
1070:
983:
886:
882:
866:
854:
846:
838:
640:
2086:
of HIST 186: International and Global History Since 1945 (it's at about 34:47 in the audio file).
1283:
878:
874:
862:
2106:
So perhaps some content ought to be added on the Basic Principles Agreement aspect of the talks.
2046:
1114:
966:
950:
492:
471:
1519:"prevented them from developing and implementing several different types of missile launchers."
1091:
Was it the SALT treaty where nuclear weapons were banned from outer space by the USSR and USA?
2136:
2117:
1747:
1716:
1692:
1688:
1673:
1299:
1271:
1225:
1217:
1210:
1192:
I'm pretty sure that some author has confused SALT I with START I. The SALT I currently reads
1181:
1156:
1126:
1106:
1080:
1056:
1033:
1025:
1017:
991:
970:
925:
1137:
Why 'Seals And Lambs Treaty'? I understand it to stand for "Strategic Arms Limitation Talks"
779:
2038:
1979:
1291:
1206:
946:
1279:
395:
2128:
2109:
1808:
article is somewhat nonsensical and is not a sufficient paraphrase of the source material.
2082:
I first heard this term used in a lecture by Professor Daniel Sargent of UC Berkeley in
1608:
1735:
1704:
1661:
1053:
745:
2145:
1077:
962:
521:
1983:
1843:
This statement is a fabrication, as nothing in the source material substantiates it.
1076:
Anti-Ballistic Missile. Basically, a missile that shoots down ballistic missiles.
2123:
Okay, I added a few sentences on the basic principles agreed upon during SALT I in
1684:
1049:
653:
1201:
That sounds like START I. If you can verify this, go ahead and change the entry.--
443:
1066:
There's no definition on this page as to the meaning of the abbreviation 'ABM'.
1202:
937:
379:
1638:
1595:
1573:
1551:
1529:
1507:
1485:
1463:
1441:
1419:
1397:
1375:
1353:
818:
1045:
630:
498:
825:
732:
708:
520:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
1048:", so I'm going to create a redirect page with that name. I know, it's a
86:
363:
2049:
2068:
National Cold War Exhibition from the Royal Air Force Museum of the UK
1232:
You do not have a section: Reasons for not allowing total disarmament.
1774:
This statement is not a sufficient paraphrase of the source material.
2042:
188:
141:
1162:
Factual error-it says Joseph Biden of Delaware signed this treaty
1853:
sufficiently paraphrased enough to escape a charge of plagiarism.
1793:"even if they had been tested previously using non-MIRV methods."
1791:
However, the rephrase attempt claims this count would go forward
1651:
on the talk page or to make a dispute resolution request at the
1288:
Knowledge (XXG) is not the place for you to promote such ideas
813:
782:
in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
778:
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the
15:
2212:
Start-Class Russian, Soviet and CIS military history articles
2182:
Start-Class military science, technology, and theory articles
1834:
article is an insufficient paraphrase of the source material.
1821:
article is an insufficient paraphrase of the source material.
2217:
Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force articles
2187:
Military science, technology, and theory task force articles
1974:
State Department Office of Public Communication (May 1979).
442:
426:
410:
394:
378:
362:
247:
824:
A fact from this article was featured on Knowledge (XXG)'s
652:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
85:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
2124:
2029:
Diehl, Paul F. (1991). "Ghosts of Arms Control Past".
2267:
Start-Class articles with conflicting quality ratings
1524:"The treaty imposed numerical ceilings on launchers."
932:
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
2202:
Start-Class North American military history articles
744:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
260:
This article has been checked against the following
2222:
Start-Class United States military history articles
2207:
North American military history task force articles
436:
Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force
388:
Military science, technology, and theory task force
345:
259:
2227:United States military history task force articles
1244:overal has a deterant called ´a nuclear weapon´.
977:Section Detailing History of Nuclear Arms Control
2242:C-Class United States articles of Low-importance
1458:No equivalent statement in the source material.
905:thus keep the military-industrial complex happy
1280:Knowledge (XXG) does not use ideas you made up
1976:The Strategic Arms Limitation Talks (Revised)
1789:"even if they are deployed with single RV's."
8:
2004:Views, Ninety-fifth Congress, Second Session
214:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Military history
2007:. Washington, DC: U.S. Govt. Print. Office.
1044:I've always heard them referred to as the "
1284:those that bear little relation to reality
1257:
1163:
1138:
1092:
911:
758:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Science Policy
703:
598:
466:
420:North American military history task force
342:
256:
136:
47:
1252:entity/individual would no longer exist.
959:Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment
561:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject United States
452:United States military history task force
2024:
2022:
2020:
2018:
2016:
2014:
1613:
1313:
666:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Soviet Union
194:This article is within the scope of the
1995:
1993:
1969:
1967:
1965:
1963:
1961:
1959:
1955:
1871:The rephrase talks about prevention of
1767:
957:Above undated message substituted from
705:
600:
468:
138:
49:
19:
2322:Selected anniversaries (November 2007)
2307:Selected anniversaries (November 2006)
2297:Selected anniversaries (November 2005)
2287:Selected anniversaries (November 2004)
2277:Low-importance Science Policy articles
2172:Start-Class military aviation articles
1830:This statement as it's written in the
1817:This statement as it's written in the
1804:This statement as it's written in the
1783:This statement as it's written in the
204:. To use this banner, please see the
2237:Low-importance United States articles
2177:Military aviation task force articles
2167:Start-Class military history articles
1278:We don't have such a section because
217:Template:WikiProject Military history
7:
2257:Low-importance Soviet Union articles
738:This article is within the scope of
646:This article is within the scope of
514:This article is within the scope of
99:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Cold War
79:This article is within the scope of
2272:Start-Class Science Policy articles
2074:3. The Basic Principles Agreement
1679:The first 1978 source can be found
761:Template:WikiProject Science Policy
654:Union of Soviet Socialist Republics
38:It is of interest to the following
2342:Selected anniversaries (June 2011)
2337:Selected anniversaries (June 2009)
2317:Selected anniversaries (June 2007)
2302:Selected anniversaries (June 2006)
2292:Selected anniversaries (June 2005)
2282:Selected anniversaries (June 2004)
2247:WikiProject United States articles
780:project-independent quality rating
564:Template:WikiProject United States
14:
2332:Selected anniversaries (May 2009)
2327:Selected anniversaries (May 2008)
2312:Selected anniversaries (May 2007)
2262:WikiProject Soviet Union articles
669:Template:WikiProject Soviet Union
2157:Low-importance Cold War articles
1637:
1594:
1572:
1550:
1528:
1506:
1484:
1462:
1440:
1418:
1396:
1374:
1352:
1326:The text as it's written in the
1317:The text as it now reads in the
936:
910:This is not a neutral analysis.
817:
731:
707:
633:
623:
602:
501:
491:
470:
319:
308:
297:
286:
275:
187:
140:
72:
51:
20:
2102:Union as a coequal superpower.
1939:Strategic Arms Limitation Talks
1832:Strategic Arms Limitation Talks
1819:Strategic Arms Limitation Talks
1806:Strategic Arms Limitation Talks
1785:Strategic Arms Limitation Talks
792:This article has been rated as
686:This article has been rated as
581:This article has been rated as
234:This article has been rated as
119:This article has been rated as
2232:C-Class United States articles
1:
2252:C-Class Soviet Union articles
2192:Start-Class weaponry articles
2118:10:03, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
1226:17:56, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
1211:00:34, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
1107:14:11, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
1034:17:52, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
752:and see a list of open tasks.
660:and see a list of open tasks.
102:Template:WikiProject Cold War
93:and see a list of open tasks.
2197:Weaponry task force articles
2162:Cold War task force articles
1904:strengthen and keep climbing
1748:04:54, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
1717:23:12, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
1693:20:39, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
1674:20:14, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
1300:22:52, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
1272:15:09, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
1188:SALT I confused with START I
1018:17:36, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
971:10:16, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
926:14:38, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
372:Military aviation task force
197:Military history WikiProject
2031:Political Science Quarterly
1908:strengthen and push forward
2358:
2062:Basic Principles Agreement
1633:Foreign Policy Ser. ; 308.
1182:19:27, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
1127:13:45, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
1081:02:03, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
1071:02:00, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
798:project's importance scale
741:WikiProject Science Policy
692:project's importance scale
587:project's importance scale
280:Referencing and citation:
125:project's importance scale
2152:C-Class Cold War articles
2137:04:23, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
1306:Section deletion proposal
1057:20:12, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
791:
777:
726:
685:
618:
580:
517:WikiProject United States
486:
450:
434:
418:
402:
386:
370:
341:
233:
220:military history articles
182:
118:
67:
46:
1984:2027/umn.31951002851956f
1906:while the rephrase uses
1893:of a show of good faith.
1117:, which predated SALT. -
992:09:07, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
649:WikiProject Soviet Union
522:United States of America
1321:Knowledge (XXG) article
1157:11:24, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
764:Science Policy articles
346:Associated task forces:
291:Coverage and accuracy:
2104:
2080:
2070:. So they have there:
1220:with best regards from
1199:
1028:with best regards from
567:United States articles
447:
431:
415:
399:
383:
367:
324:Supporting materials:
252:
28:This article is rated
2091:
2072:
1194:
945:. Student editor(s):
834:section on 13 dates.
672:Soviet Union articles
446:
430:
414:
398:
382:
366:
251:
32:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
1087:Which treaty was it?
509:United States portal
169:Russian & Soviet
82:WikiProject Cold War
641:Soviet Union portal
535:Articles Requested!
404:Weaponry task force
313:Grammar and style:
266:for B-class status:
1619:Spurious reference
1311:"A" through "L".
1115:Outer Space Treaty
1113:That was the 1967
1061:
943:on the course page
448:
432:
416:
400:
384:
368:
253:
202:list of open tasks
34:content assessment
1877:actually deployed
1648:
1647:
1634:
1626:
1605:
1604:
1591:
1586:
1569:
1564:
1547:
1542:
1525:
1520:
1503:
1498:
1481:
1476:
1454:
1437:
1432:
1415:
1410:
1393:
1388:
1371:
1366:
1349:
1344:
1337:
1274:
1262:comment added by
1223:
1184:
1168:comment added by
1159:
1143:comment added by
1109:
1097:comment added by
1050:redundant acronym
1031:
1008:comment added by
928:
916:comment added by
893:
892:
871:November 17, 2007
859:November 17, 2006
851:November 17, 2005
843:November 17, 2004
836:
812:
811:
808:
807:
804:
803:
702:
701:
698:
697:
597:
596:
593:
592:
465:
464:
461:
460:
457:
456:
337:
336:
326:criterion not met
282:criterion not met
238:on the project's
206:full instructions
135:
134:
131:
130:
105:Cold War articles
2349:
2054:
2053:
2026:
2009:
2008:
1997:
1988:
1987:
1971:
1943:
1931:
1925:
1917:
1911:
1902:The source says
1900:
1894:
1886:
1880:
1869:
1863:
1860:
1854:
1850:
1844:
1841:
1835:
1828:
1822:
1815:
1809:
1802:
1796:
1781:
1775:
1772:
1745:
1743:
1738:
1714:
1712:
1707:
1671:
1669:
1664:
1641:
1631:
1624:
1614:
1598:
1589:
1584:
1576:
1567:
1562:
1554:
1545:
1540:
1532:
1523:
1518:
1510:
1501:
1496:
1488:
1479:
1474:
1466:
1452:
1444:
1435:
1430:
1422:
1413:
1408:
1400:
1391:
1386:
1378:
1369:
1364:
1356:
1347:
1342:
1335:
1314:
1218:
1026:
1020:
997:Misleading Photo
973:
940:
835:
821:
814:
766:
765:
762:
759:
756:
735:
728:
727:
722:
719:
711:
704:
674:
673:
670:
667:
664:
643:
638:
637:
636:
627:
620:
619:
614:
606:
599:
569:
568:
565:
562:
559:
511:
506:
505:
504:
495:
488:
487:
482:
474:
467:
353:
343:
327:
323:
322:
316:
312:
311:
305:
301:
300:
294:
290:
289:
283:
279:
278:
257:
222:
221:
218:
215:
212:
211:Military history
191:
184:
183:
178:
175:
148:Military history
144:
137:
107:
106:
103:
100:
97:
76:
69:
68:
63:
55:
48:
31:
25:
24:
16:
2357:
2356:
2352:
2351:
2350:
2348:
2347:
2346:
2142:
2141:
2064:
2059:
2058:
2057:
2043:10.2307/2150937
2028:
2027:
2012:
1999:
1998:
1991:
1973:
1972:
1957:
1948:
1947:
1946:
1932:
1928:
1918:
1914:
1901:
1897:
1887:
1883:
1870:
1866:
1861:
1857:
1851:
1847:
1842:
1838:
1829:
1825:
1816:
1812:
1803:
1799:
1782:
1778:
1773:
1769:
1741:
1736:
1734:
1710:
1705:
1703:
1667:
1662:
1660:
1653:ANI Noticeboard
1330:Source material
1308:
1234:
1190:
1135:
1089:
1068:130.194.157.132
1064:
1042:
1003:
999:
979:
956:
934:
898:
889:
763:
760:
757:
754:
753:
720:
717:
671:
668:
665:
662:
661:
639:
634:
632:
612:
566:
563:
560:
557:
556:
555:
541:Become a Member
507:
502:
500:
480:
351:
325:
320:
314:
309:
303:
298:
292:
287:
281:
276:
219:
216:
213:
210:
209:
176:
150:
104:
101:
98:
95:
94:
61:
29:
12:
11:
5:
2355:
2353:
2345:
2344:
2339:
2334:
2329:
2324:
2319:
2314:
2309:
2304:
2299:
2294:
2289:
2284:
2279:
2274:
2269:
2264:
2259:
2254:
2249:
2244:
2239:
2234:
2229:
2224:
2219:
2214:
2209:
2204:
2199:
2194:
2189:
2184:
2179:
2174:
2169:
2164:
2159:
2154:
2144:
2143:
2140:
2139:
2089:Sargent says:
2063:
2060:
2056:
2055:
2037:(4): 597–615.
2010:
1989:
1954:
1953:
1949:
1945:
1944:
1926:
1912:
1895:
1881:
1864:
1855:
1845:
1836:
1823:
1810:
1797:
1776:
1766:
1765:
1761:
1759:
1757:
1756:
1755:
1754:
1753:
1752:
1751:
1750:
1722:
1721:
1720:
1719:
1696:
1695:
1658:
1656:
1646:
1645:
1635:
1628:
1627:
1622:
1603:
1602:
1592:
1587:
1581:
1580:
1570:
1565:
1559:
1558:
1548:
1543:
1537:
1536:
1526:
1521:
1515:
1514:
1504:
1499:
1493:
1492:
1482:
1477:
1471:
1470:
1460:
1455:
1449:
1448:
1438:
1433:
1427:
1426:
1416:
1411:
1405:
1404:
1394:
1389:
1383:
1382:
1372:
1367:
1361:
1360:
1350:
1345:
1339:
1338:
1333:
1327:
1324:
1318:
1307:
1304:
1303:
1302:
1264:190.37.128.210
1233:
1230:
1229:
1228:
1189:
1186:
1145:Righteous lies
1134:
1131:
1130:
1129:
1119:Ashley Pomeroy
1088:
1085:
1084:
1083:
1063:
1060:
1041:
1038:
1037:
1036:
998:
995:
984:Upshotknothole
978:
975:
933:
930:
918:213.174.190.59
897:
894:
891:
890:
837:
822:
810:
809:
806:
805:
802:
801:
794:Low-importance
790:
784:
783:
776:
770:
769:
767:
755:Science Policy
750:the discussion
746:Science policy
736:
724:
723:
721:Low‑importance
715:Science Policy
712:
700:
699:
696:
695:
688:Low-importance
684:
678:
677:
675:
658:the discussion
645:
644:
628:
616:
615:
613:Low‑importance
607:
595:
594:
591:
590:
583:Low-importance
579:
573:
572:
570:
554:
553:
548:
543:
538:
531:
529:Template Usage
525:
513:
512:
496:
484:
483:
481:Low‑importance
475:
463:
462:
459:
458:
455:
454:
449:
439:
438:
433:
423:
422:
417:
407:
406:
401:
391:
390:
385:
375:
374:
369:
359:
358:
356:
354:
348:
347:
339:
338:
335:
334:
332:
330:
329:
328:
317:
306:
295:
284:
270:
269:
267:
254:
244:
243:
232:
226:
225:
223:
192:
180:
179:
145:
133:
132:
129:
128:
121:Low-importance
117:
111:
110:
108:
91:the discussion
77:
65:
64:
62:Low‑importance
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2354:
2343:
2340:
2338:
2335:
2333:
2330:
2328:
2325:
2323:
2320:
2318:
2315:
2313:
2310:
2308:
2305:
2303:
2300:
2298:
2295:
2293:
2290:
2288:
2285:
2283:
2280:
2278:
2275:
2273:
2270:
2268:
2265:
2263:
2260:
2258:
2255:
2253:
2250:
2248:
2245:
2243:
2240:
2238:
2235:
2233:
2230:
2228:
2225:
2223:
2220:
2218:
2215:
2213:
2210:
2208:
2205:
2203:
2200:
2198:
2195:
2193:
2190:
2188:
2185:
2183:
2180:
2178:
2175:
2173:
2170:
2168:
2165:
2163:
2160:
2158:
2155:
2153:
2150:
2149:
2147:
2138:
2134:
2130:
2126:
2122:
2121:
2120:
2119:
2115:
2111:
2107:
2103:
2099:
2095:
2090:
2087:
2085:
2079:
2075:
2071:
2069:
2061:
2051:
2048:
2044:
2040:
2036:
2032:
2025:
2023:
2021:
2019:
2017:
2015:
2011:
2006:
2005:
1996:
1994:
1990:
1985:
1981:
1977:
1970:
1968:
1966:
1964:
1962:
1960:
1956:
1952:
1940:
1936:
1930:
1927:
1923:
1916:
1913:
1909:
1905:
1899:
1896:
1892:
1885:
1882:
1878:
1874:
1868:
1865:
1859:
1856:
1849:
1846:
1840:
1837:
1833:
1827:
1824:
1820:
1814:
1811:
1807:
1801:
1798:
1794:
1790:
1786:
1780:
1777:
1771:
1768:
1764:
1760:
1749:
1746:
1744:
1739:
1730:
1729:
1728:
1727:
1726:
1725:
1724:
1723:
1718:
1715:
1713:
1708:
1700:
1699:
1698:
1697:
1694:
1690:
1686:
1682:
1678:
1677:
1676:
1675:
1672:
1670:
1665:
1654:
1644:
1640:
1636:
1630:
1629:
1625:Action taken
1623:
1621:
1620:
1616:
1615:
1612:
1610:
1601:
1597:
1593:
1588:
1583:
1582:
1579:
1575:
1571:
1566:
1561:
1560:
1557:
1553:
1549:
1544:
1539:
1538:
1535:
1531:
1527:
1522:
1517:
1516:
1513:
1509:
1505:
1500:
1495:
1494:
1491:
1487:
1483:
1478:
1473:
1472:
1469:
1465:
1461:
1459:
1456:
1451:
1450:
1447:
1443:
1439:
1434:
1429:
1428:
1425:
1421:
1417:
1412:
1407:
1406:
1403:
1399:
1395:
1390:
1385:
1384:
1381:
1377:
1373:
1368:
1363:
1362:
1359:
1355:
1351:
1346:
1341:
1340:
1336:Action taken
1334:
1332:
1331:
1325:
1323:
1322:
1316:
1315:
1312:
1305:
1301:
1297:
1293:
1289:
1285:
1281:
1277:
1276:
1275:
1273:
1269:
1265:
1261:
1253:
1249:
1245:
1241:
1237:
1231:
1227:
1224:
1221:
1215:
1214:
1213:
1212:
1208:
1204:
1198:
1193:
1187:
1185:
1183:
1179:
1175:
1171:
1167:
1160:
1158:
1154:
1150:
1146:
1142:
1132:
1128:
1124:
1120:
1116:
1112:
1111:
1110:
1108:
1104:
1100:
1096:
1086:
1082:
1079:
1075:
1074:
1073:
1072:
1069:
1062:What is 'ABM'
1059:
1058:
1055:
1051:
1047:
1039:
1035:
1032:
1029:
1023:
1022:
1021:
1019:
1015:
1011:
1010:90.199.31.127
1007:
996:
994:
993:
989:
985:
976:
974:
972:
968:
964:
960:
954:
952:
951:Jayjohnson540
948:
944:
939:
931:
929:
927:
923:
919:
915:
908:
906:
901:
895:
888:
887:June 18, 2011
884:
883:June 18, 2009
880:
876:
872:
868:
867:June 18, 2007
864:
860:
856:
855:June 18, 2006
852:
848:
847:June 18, 2005
844:
840:
839:June 18, 2004
833:
832:
827:
823:
820:
816:
815:
799:
795:
789:
786:
785:
781:
775:
772:
771:
768:
751:
747:
743:
742:
737:
734:
730:
729:
725:
716:
713:
710:
706:
693:
689:
683:
680:
679:
676:
659:
655:
651:
650:
642:
631:
629:
626:
622:
621:
617:
611:
608:
605:
601:
588:
584:
578:
575:
574:
571:
558:United States
552:
549:
547:
544:
542:
539:
537:
536:
532:
530:
527:
526:
523:
519:
518:
510:
499:
497:
494:
490:
489:
485:
479:
478:United States
476:
473:
469:
453:
445:
441:
440:
437:
429:
425:
424:
421:
413:
409:
408:
405:
397:
393:
392:
389:
381:
377:
376:
373:
365:
361:
360:
357:
355:
350:
349:
344:
340:
333:
331:
318:
315:criterion met
307:
304:criterion met
296:
293:criterion met
285:
274:
273:
272:
271:
268:
265:
264:
258:
255:
250:
246:
245:
241:
240:quality scale
237:
231:
228:
227:
224:
207:
203:
199:
198:
193:
190:
186:
185:
181:
174:
173:United States
170:
166:
165:North America
162:
158:
154:
149:
146:
143:
139:
126:
122:
116:
113:
112:
109:
92:
88:
84:
83:
78:
75:
71:
70:
66:
60:
57:
54:
50:
45:
41:
35:
27:
23:
18:
17:
2108:
2105:
2100:
2096:
2092:
2088:
2081:
2076:
2073:
2065:
2034:
2030:
2002:
1975:
1950:
1934:
1929:
1915:
1907:
1903:
1898:
1890:
1884:
1876:
1872:
1867:
1858:
1848:
1839:
1826:
1813:
1800:
1792:
1788:
1779:
1770:
1762:
1758:
1733:
1702:
1659:
1649:
1642:
1618:
1617:
1606:
1599:
1577:
1555:
1533:
1511:
1489:
1467:
1457:
1445:
1423:
1401:
1379:
1357:
1329:
1328:
1320:
1319:
1309:
1258:— Preceding
1254:
1250:
1246:
1242:
1238:
1235:
1222:VINCENZO1492
1219:
1200:
1195:
1191:
1164:— Preceding
1161:
1139:— Preceding
1136:
1093:— Preceding
1090:
1065:
1043:
1030:VINCENZO1492
1027:
1000:
980:
955:
935:
912:— Preceding
909:
904:
902:
899:
879:May 26, 2009
875:May 26, 2008
863:May 26, 2007
829:
793:
739:
687:
663:Soviet Union
647:
610:Soviet Union
582:
546:Project Talk
534:
515:
261:
235:
195:
120:
80:
40:WikiProjects
1873:development
1609:unlocatable
1292:Ian.thomson
1282:especially
1170:Dnvrbrncs95
1099:85.3.95.143
1004:—Preceding
947:EmilySloate
831:On this day
718:Start‑class
302:Structure:
236:Start-class
177:Start‑class
2146:Categories
2129:Jjjjjjjjjj
2110:Jjjjjjjjjj
2084:Lecture 15
1951:References
1942:elsewhere.
1737:Spintendo
1706:Spintendo
1663:Spintendo
1046:SALT Talks
1040:Salt Talks
157:Technology
2125:this edit
1922:WP:ISAWIT
1657:Regards,
1133:The title
1054:xxxyyyzzz
826:Main Page
1891:opposite
1260:unsigned
1178:contribs
1166:unsigned
1153:contribs
1141:unsigned
1095:unsigned
1078:Rklawton
1006:unsigned
963:PrimeBOT
914:unsigned
896:Untitled
263:criteria
161:Weaponry
153:Aviation
96:Cold War
87:Cold War
59:Cold War
2050:2150937
1685:Uglemat
1643:Deleted
1600:Deleted
1578:Deleted
1556:Deleted
1534:Deleted
1512:Deleted
1490:Deleted
1468:Deleted
1446:Deleted
1424:Deleted
1402:Deleted
1380:Deleted
1358:Deleted
828:in the
796:on the
690:on the
585:on the
123:on the
30:C-class
1203:Gadlen
885:, and
551:Alerts
36:scale.
2047:JSTOR
1763:Notes
774:Start
230:Start
2133:talk
2114:talk
1689:talk
1681:here
1296:talk
1268:talk
1207:talk
1174:talk
1149:talk
1123:talk
1103:talk
1014:talk
988:talk
967:talk
922:talk
2127:.
2039:doi
2035:105
1980:hdl
1935:was
1742:ᔦá”
1711:ᔦá”
1668:ᔦá”
1655:.
1286:.
961:by
907:."
788:Low
682:Low
577:Low
115:Low
2148::
2135:)
2116:)
2045:.
2033:.
2013:^
1992:^
1958:^
1691:)
1683:.
1611:.
1298:)
1290:.
1270:)
1209:)
1180:)
1176:•
1155:)
1151:•
1125:)
1105:)
1052:.
1016:)
990:)
969:)
953:.
949:,
924:)
881:,
877:,
873:,
869:,
865:,
861:,
857:,
853:,
849:,
845:,
841:,
352:/
171:/
167:/
163:/
159:/
155:/
151::
2131:(
2112:(
2052:.
2041::
1986:.
1982::
1879:.
1687:(
1294:(
1266:(
1205:(
1172:(
1147:(
1121:(
1101:(
1012:(
986:(
965:(
920:(
800:.
694:.
589:.
242:.
208:.
127:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
