Knowledge (XXG)

Talk:HD 80606 and HD 80607

Source 📝

163: 91: 64: 33: 101: 404:
My assertion is based on a sampling of the SIMBAD list of papers pertaining to this system. The Struve/Σ designation is typically unused, probably because parallax determination is not the main reason these stars are studied. (Same goes for all the references in this article in fact). I see no reason
389:
Struve Catalogue of Double Stars designations are frequently used in papers dealing with parallax determination, including the observation data from Romanoff Pulkowo Observatory. As for Mizar and Alcor, that is the traditional treatment of that pairing, whereas the proposed name is a pair of stars,
286:– The designation "Struve 1341" is rarely if ever used. The majority of sources refer to this system by the HD designations of the individual stars rather than the combined designation of the binary system, even in references specifically dealing with the system's binarity (e.g. 511: 215:
as the last term is used in the papers related to trans-Neptunian objects and irregular satellites. Please let me know which term is commonly used in extrasolar planets-related papers (this article is the only one linking to the Kozai
501: 373: 153: 506: 172: 74: 289:). Since the designations of individual components are far more commonly-used than the binary designations it therefore makes sense to follow the example of 496: 143: 491: 390:
while the current designation is for the double star pairing. "Σ1341" and "Struve 1341", usually Struve designations would use Sigma in print. --
326: 437: 250:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
391: 406: 334: 114: 69: 300: 44: 241: 377: 322: 433: 473: 251: 50: 32: 395: 410: 338: 283: 354:
Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with
315: 425: 429: 177: 162: 268: 221: 303: 106: 290: 208: 463: 485: 428:
in most cases, and this is no exception. Nominator's rationale is very convincing.
264: 287: 512:
Pages within the scope of WikiProject Astronomical objects (WP Astronomy Banner)
441: 414: 399: 342: 279: 272: 224: 17: 472:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a
96: 405:
to use a designation that is hardly ever used in references to this system.
119: 90: 63: 207:
I would like to move (and expand, of course) the currently sketchy
26: 161: 240:
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a
462:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
376:, please explain your reasons, taking into account 254:. No further edits should be made to this section. 476:. No further edits should be made to this section. 502:Start-Class Astronomy articles of Low-importance 8: 176:, which collaborates on articles related to 118:, which collaborates on articles related to 30: 378:Knowledge (XXG)'s policy on article titles 374:polling is not a substitute for discussion 58: 507:Start-Class Astronomical objects articles 60: 128:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Astronomy 7: 259:The result of the move request was: 112:This article is within the scope of 49:It is of interest to the following 25: 497:Low-importance Astronomy articles 173:WikiProject Astronomical objects 99: 89: 62: 31: 148:This article has been rated as 492:Start-Class Astronomy articles 131:Template:WikiProject Astronomy 1: 366:, then sign your comment with 225:08:25, 8 September 2006 (UTC) 170:This article is supported by 528: 293:and use the two combined. 233:Requested move 01 May 2014 154:project's importance scale 169: 147: 84: 57: 469:Please do not modify it. 454:Any additional comments: 308:00:23, 24 May 2014 (UTC) 273:12:33, 5 June 2014 (UTC) 247:Please do not modify it. 442:14:37, 1 May 2014 (UTC) 415:11:16, 1 May 2014 (UTC) 400:10:47, 1 May 2014 (UTC) 343:09:57, 1 May 2014 (UTC) 331:20:47, 9 May 2014 (UTC) 166: 39:This article is rated 284:HD 80606 and HD 80607 165: 115:WikiProject Astronomy 43:on Knowledge (XXG)'s 178:astronomical objects 75:Astronomical objects 424:; we should follow 122:on Knowledge (XXG). 167: 134:Astronomy articles 45:content assessment 332: 330: 309: 302: 192: 191: 188: 187: 184: 183: 16:(Redirected from 519: 471: 370: 364: 358: 321: 318: 310: 299: 294: 249: 136: 135: 132: 129: 126: 109: 107:Astronomy portal 104: 103: 102: 93: 86: 85: 80: 77: 66: 59: 42: 36: 35: 27: 21: 18:Talk:Struve 1341 527: 526: 522: 521: 520: 518: 517: 516: 482: 481: 480: 467: 450: 368: 362: 356: 350: 316: 291:Mizar and Alcor 245: 235: 213:Kozai resonance 209:Kozai mechanism 205: 133: 130: 127: 124: 123: 105: 100: 98: 78: 72: 40: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 525: 523: 515: 514: 509: 504: 499: 494: 484: 483: 479: 478: 464:requested move 458: 457: 456: 449: 446: 445: 444: 430:StringTheory11 419: 418: 417: 383: 382: 357:*'''Support''' 349: 346: 278: 276: 257: 256: 242:requested move 236: 234: 231: 229: 204: 193: 190: 189: 186: 185: 182: 181: 168: 158: 157: 150:Low-importance 146: 140: 139: 137: 111: 110: 94: 82: 81: 79:Low‑importance 67: 55: 54: 48: 37: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 524: 513: 510: 508: 505: 503: 500: 498: 495: 493: 490: 489: 487: 477: 475: 470: 465: 460: 459: 455: 452: 451: 447: 443: 439: 435: 431: 427: 423: 420: 416: 412: 408: 403: 402: 401: 397: 393: 392:65.94.171.206 388: 385: 384: 381: 379: 375: 367: 363:*'''Oppose''' 361: 355: 352: 351: 347: 345: 344: 340: 336: 328: 324: 320: 314: 307: 306: 301: 298: 292: 288: 285: 281: 275: 274: 270: 266: 262: 255: 253: 248: 243: 238: 237: 232: 230: 227: 226: 223: 219: 214: 210: 202: 198: 194: 179: 175: 174: 164: 160: 159: 155: 151: 145: 142: 141: 138: 121: 117: 116: 108: 97: 95: 92: 88: 87: 83: 76: 71: 68: 65: 61: 56: 52: 46: 38: 34: 29: 28: 19: 468: 461: 453: 421: 407:77.57.25.250 386: 371: 365: 359: 353: 335:77.57.25.250 312: 304: 296: 277: 260: 258: 246: 239: 228: 222:Eurocommuter 217: 212: 206: 200: 196: 171: 149: 113: 51:WikiProjects 474:move review 305:victor falk 280:Struve 1341 252:move review 41:Start-class 486:Categories 448:Discussion 426:WP:NCASTRO 319:HairedGirl 220:). Thanks 313:Relisted. 297:Relisted. 218:mechanism 201:resonance 197:mechanism 125:Astronomy 120:Astronomy 70:Astronomy 372:. Since 327:contribs 422:Support 265:Jenks24 152:on the 387:Oppose 348:Survey 323:(talk) 195:Kozai 47:scale. 317:Brown 261:moved 411:talk 396:talk 369:~~~~ 339:talk 269:talk 466:. 325:• ( 211:to 199:or 144:Low 488:: 440:) 436:• 413:) 398:) 360:or 341:) 333:-- 311:-- 295:-- 282:→ 271:) 263:. 244:. 73:: 438:c 434:t 432:( 409:( 394:( 380:. 337:( 329:) 267:( 203:? 180:. 156:. 53:: 20:)

Index

Talk:Struve 1341

content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Astronomy
Astronomical objects
WikiProject icon
Astronomy portal
WikiProject Astronomy
Astronomy
Low
project's importance scale
Taskforce icon
WikiProject Astronomical objects
astronomical objects
Kozai mechanism
Eurocommuter
08:25, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
requested move
move review
Jenks24
talk
12:33, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
Struve 1341
HD 80606 and HD 80607

Mizar and Alcor

victor falk

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.