408:
376:
1548:
plan was to mount 31 of them on the B-1's internal and external hardpoints, one can see how the claim is wildly unrealistic and inconsistent. The "Mach 5+" and "Mach 7 (planned)" numbers are accurate and not inconsistent with each other -- the Mach 5 speed was tested and demonstrated, the Mach 7 speed was planned and has not yet been publicly announced as having been achieved. I've tagged the Mach 20 claim as disputed; for further discussion about how it should be handled.
516:
392:
880:
119:
245:
1227:
932:
792:
360:
60:
764:
756:
745:
720:
712:
704:
686:
678:
658:
647:
629:
621:
610:
136:
1148:
961:
844:
317:
306:
295:
284:
273:
32:
203:
167:
1547:
The Mach 20 claim is an unfortunate relic of a typically reliable source uncritically publishing speculation as fact. They cite no evidence to support the claim, which is absurd on it's face as that would put it's speeds on par with the largest of ICBMs. Since the same source claims that the original
1420:
I've spotted one other (imo) gross error with the
Popular Mechanics article - at this point I think they should not be relied on for anything technical or specific. Does Knowledge (XXG) have a list of sources that are not allowed due to chronic problems with factal details and so forth? I wonder if
1394:
There's simply no reason to suspect that the
Popular Mechanics claim is correct or accurate, since it was made prior to the ARRW ever having been tested (even ignoring the fact that it could not physically possibly achieve those speeds in that form factor), while the other claims involve demonstrated
1457:
ARRW's weight is definitely less than 3 tons; otherwise it wouldn't have been able to fit on the B-52's pylons either since they're only rated to 5,000lb. Which is what I've seen most sources speculating as the ARRW's weight. Regardless, the same primary sources that generated the "31 weapons" claim
1376:
speed of 6.5-8, which is not the same as a top speed. Unless there is a reason to reject the very direct claim made by popular mechanics that " The AGM-183A “Arrow” is a so-called “boost glide” hypersonic weapon, using a rocket motor to launch the hypersonic vehicle to a high altitude, accelerating
1017:
Nick
Schifrin and the China Times are two separate people (the first is a natural person from the United States and the second is a juristic person from China). There are some other sources not included in the article that have made similar theorizations. I think this hook would become very long if
1442:
that's not even considering the weapon's physical size or the number of external hardpoints available on a B1-B (I'm guessing the sweep wings reduce the number of those as compared the B-52). I'd even suspect that the popular science writer mixed up the B1's payload in tons with weapon count.
1441:
Although
Popular Mechanics might have an article online that claims that a B-1B could carry 31 of these weapons - I don't think that should be blindly accepted. This weapon weighs roughly 3 tons, and the B1-B's maximum payload is 34 tons. Do the math and the most it can carry is around 10, and
1289:
The article begins by stating this is a term "used". Is this just to make it sound like the one who actually used it (Trump) is not a buffoon? Who no citation included showing anyone ever used the term before the recent Trump press conference? I'm not sure the article was created in good faith.
1061:
I could. Let me know if you think that would be helpful. The reference is a straight news article, as opposed to an analytical piece, so I'm not entirely sure it would be correct to say the author (Feiau Jiang) theorized it as opposed to reporting the editorial belief of the newspaper or the
1519:
Not only are other sources contradicting themselves on this matter, this page itself gives 3 different numbers for maximum speed: Mach 5, Mach 7-8, and Mach 20. As this is a pretty important stat (and the numbers are quite varied), it would be nice to have some sort of clarification.
1316:, we can't engage in original lexiconical analysis to make that determination. That said, the lead has since been edited with a better reading introductory sentence that simply states it is an informal term and doesn't ruminate on its use by invoking the words "term used".
383:
181:
399:
185:
1458:
also claimed it could go Mach 20 and called it a "cruise missile", so while it's clear that the claim was made by USAF officials, and we should report on it, we should also attribute that it's widely doubted (see, e.g.
367:
177:
1352:
I'm guessing it's not a typo, but do they mean the F15 or the F15E Strike Eagle for as far as launch platforms go? I'm fairly certain they meant the Strike Eagle, as that's the only one with any A2G capability.
415:
189:
1308:
Whether one or one million people used the term, it is — by evidence of the sources — "a term used". To declare or imply, in WP's voice, the specific number of persons who had used the term would need
1605:
1615:
1372:
Theres been some editing back and forth about the the top speed of the weapon, people are changing it to 6.5-8 based on the report to congress, but that report to congress cites 6.5-8 as an
1600:
1610:
851:
42:
499:
111:
258:
215:
855:
565:
244:
1595:
890:, the AfD was closed as "keep but rename", so I have made the necessary adjustments to this template to reflect the article move (but the template itself should
1590:
1580:
1625:
1585:
1459:
814:
Coming here from the AfD, which I discovered through ITN. Whatever happens to it eventually, we should hold this until after the AfD discussion closes.
1377:
it to Mach 20" then Mach 20 should be the maximum speed. It is probably worth inlcuding the average speed somewhere in the artcle or info box aswell.
210:
172:
1620:
107:
1306:"The article begins by stating this is a term "used". Is this just to make it sound like the one who actually used it (Trump) is not a buffoon?"
1443:
1422:
1234:. It is properly mentioned inline, verified by the citation, and interesting to a broad audience. Article adheres to all other DYK criteria.
219:
515:
664:
1002:
PBS news correspondent Nick
Schifrin has theorized that the Super-Duper Missile is, in fact, the AGM-183A, as has the China Times.
407:
672:
147:
458:
1494:
source 2 says: “This thing is going to be able to go, in 10-12 minutes, almost 1,000 miles,” Gebara said. “It’s amazing.”
38:
641:
1358:
1128:
Oh. Well then, we have two reporters theorizing that this is the Super-Duper
Missile. Is this the hook you want?
894:
be moved). However, the hook as written no longer works and has been struck; a new ALT will need to be provided.
750:
698:
615:
604:
1447:
1426:
1538:
1530:
153:
214:. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
964:
Hi, I came by to promote this, but this appears to be one man's opinion. Shouldn't we attribute it to him?
668:
1295:
819:
375:
899:
75:
1320:"Who no citation included showing anyone ever used the term before the recent Trump press conference?"
1554:
1468:
1401:
1382:
1354:
1239:
1212:
1167:
135:
31:
1501:
1337:
1067:
1023:
921:
833:
579:
529:
1534:
1526:
1505:
1182:
1108:
984:
941:
868:
801:
739:
59:
1395:
results. Notably no other source supports the
Popular Mechanics claim. It is a fringe opinion.
1291:
1133:
1093:
1048:
1008:
969:
860:
Articles nominated for deletion must go on hold until they have survived the deletion process.
815:
479:
652:
913:
895:
1329:
1549:
1463:
1396:
1378:
1235:
1208:
1163:
1313:
1309:
17:
1333:
1157:
1063:
1034:
1019:
917:
883:
829:
575:
1437:
B1-B can carry 31 of these? IMO claim should be removed as its obviously nonsensical.
1574:
1177:
1153:
1103:
1081:
979:
936:
887:
863:
796:
547:
91:
879:
443:
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below.
1202:
1129:
1089:
1044:
1004:
965:
475:
391:
80:
1325:
1319:
1305:
1062:
consensus of their sources. But I'm fine either way, let me know what you think!
545:
ALT-1 ... that the announced "Super-Duper
Missile" has been theorized to be the
1226:
931:
791:
449:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
1162:, it's been almost three weeks since any comment. What's going on here folks?
1147:
960:
1491:
Niether of the sources for the range actually support the 1000 mile figure
70:
89:... that the announced "Super-Duper Missile" has been theorized to be the
1043:
is a newspaper. Perhaps you could mention the person being quoted there?
828:
Agreed! It would be best to put this on ice until the discussion closes.
533:
has been theorized to be the AGM-183A air launched rapid response weapon
843:
359:
461:), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page.
1566:
1542:
1509:
1480:
1451:
1430:
1413:
1386:
1362:
1341:
1299:
1243:
1216:
1187:
1171:
1137:
1113:
1097:
1071:
1052:
1027:
1012:
989:
973:
946:
925:
903:
873:
837:
823:
806:
583:
483:
978:
No, it was an announcement by a high-ranking government official.
732:
Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
202:
166:
1322:
Feel free to add a reference. Anyone is free to edit this article.
129:
54:
26:
1088:. Is that referring to Feiau Jiang? Or is Jiang a reporter?
1086:
it was an announcement by a high-ranking government official
406:
390:
374:
358:
243:
117:
1207:, are you okay with this? Do you want a second opinion?
504:
495:
862:
Note that it was not nominated when it was reviewed.
110:. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at
1326:"I'm not sure the article was created in good faith."
856:
Knowledge (XXG):Did you know/Supplementary guidelines
725:
112:
Template:Did you know nominations/Super-Duper
Missile
1102:I was referring to the name "Super duper missile".
256:
This article has been checked against the following
1606:
North
American military history task force articles
341:
255:
1616:United States military history task force articles
1000:Isn't this the sentence containing the hook fact?
1285:Actual colloquial term or revisionist propaganda?
566:Template:Did you know nominations/Open Ice Summit
1601:B-Class North American military history articles
1611:B-Class United States military history articles
1462:which is generally reliable about ordnance.)
520:AGM-183A carried by a B-52 during a 2019 test
8:
1176:Good to go with ALT1. AfD has been closed.
463:No further edits should be made to this page
228:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Military history
1421:Popular Mechanics should be added to it...
384:North American military history task force
338:
252:
161:
108:Knowledge (XXG):Recent additions/2020/July
400:United States military history task force
83:). The text of the entry was as follows:
1497:source 3 is also refering to this quote
208:This article is within the scope of the
1018:we added exhaustive attribution to it.
163:
133:
118:
1500:this is talking about speed not range
1085:
1001:
527:... that the United States' announced
218:. To use this banner, please see the
1596:Military aviation task force articles
1581:Knowledge (XXG) Did you know articles
854:closes. We do this all the time. See
231:Template:WikiProject Military history
106:A record of the entry may be seen at
7:
912:Thanks for keeping on top of this,
551:air launched rapid response weapon
152:It is of interest to the following
97:air-launched rapid response weapon
1591:B-Class military aviation articles
25:
1626:Post-Cold War task force articles
1586:B-Class military history articles
459:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Did you know
1312:that explicitly state that. Per
1225:
1146:
959:
930:
878:
842:
790:
762:
754:
743:
718:
710:
702:
684:
676:
656:
645:
627:
619:
608:
514:
315:
304:
293:
282:
271:
201:
165:
134:
58:
30:
446:Please do not modify this page.
37:This article was nominated for
1621:B-Class Post-Cold War articles
69:appeared on Knowledge (XXG)'s
41:on 20 May 2020. The result of
1:
1330:can be nominated for deletion
1387:21:13, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
368:Military aviation task force
211:Military history WikiProject
773:
451:this nomination's talk page
1642:
1567:23:08, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
1543:16:55, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
1481:23:26, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
1414:23:13, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
1363:13:41, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
276:Referencing and citation:
1510:22:48, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
1452:15:47, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
1431:15:53, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
1244:10:00, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
1217:00:25, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
1188:19:10, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
1172:12:29, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
1138:21:01, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
1114:20:54, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
1098:20:50, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
1072:20:25, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
1053:14:49, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
1028:23:41, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
1013:23:45, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
990:19:40, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
974:13:20, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
484:10:30, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
414:
398:
382:
366:
337:
234:military history articles
196:
160:
1342:04:20, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
1300:23:06, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
1039:OK, but on the surface,
947:19:34, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
926:06:07, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
904:22:57, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
874:19:36, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
838:16:44, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
824:15:49, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
807:22:05, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
584:08:04, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
416:Post-Cold War task force
79:column on 27 July 2020 (
18:Talk:Super-Duper Missile
935:Good to go with ALT1.
455:the article's talk page
436:Did you know nomination
342:Associated task forces:
287:Coverage and accuracy:
1080:But now I'm confused.
916:. Alt proposed above.
411:
395:
379:
363:
320:Supporting materials:
248:
142:This article is rated
123:
582:). Self-nominated at
410:
394:
378:
362:
247:
146:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
121:
665:copyright violations
599:General eligibility:
530:Super-Duper Missile
309:Grammar and style:
262:for B-class status:
673:close paraphrasing
636:Policy compliance:
412:
396:
380:
364:
249:
216:list of open tasks
148:content assessment
124:
1565:
1479:
1412:
784:
783:
772:
771:
693:Hook eligibility:
642:Adequate sourcing
587:
433:
432:
429:
428:
425:
424:
421:
420:
333:
332:
220:full instructions
128:
127:
53:
52:
16:(Redirected from
1633:
1564:
1562:
1561:
1558:
1552:
1478:
1476:
1475:
1472:
1466:
1411:
1409:
1408:
1405:
1399:
1327:
1321:
1307:
1229:
1206:
1185:
1180:
1161:
1150:
1111:
1106:
1084:said above that
1038:
987:
982:
963:
944:
939:
934:
882:
871:
866:
846:
804:
799:
794:
774:
766:
765:
761:Clear at 100px:
758:
757:
747:
746:
726:
722:
721:
717:Other problems:
714:
713:
706:
705:
688:
687:
683:Other problems:
680:
679:
660:
659:
649:
648:
631:
630:
626:Other problems:
623:
622:
612:
611:
573:
518:
470:The result was:
448:
349:
339:
323:
319:
318:
312:
308:
307:
301:
297:
296:
290:
286:
285:
279:
275:
274:
253:
236:
235:
232:
229:
226:
225:Military history
205:
198:
197:
192:
173:Military history
169:
162:
145:
139:
138:
130:
120:
103:
94:
62:
55:
34:
27:
21:
1641:
1640:
1636:
1635:
1634:
1632:
1631:
1630:
1571:
1570:
1559:
1556:
1555:
1550:
1517:
1515:Maximum speed??
1489:
1473:
1470:
1469:
1464:
1444:142.112.143.183
1439:
1423:142.112.143.183
1406:
1403:
1402:
1397:
1370:
1355:KinneticSlammer
1350:
1287:
1282:
1200:
1183:
1178:
1151:
1109:
1104:
1032:
985:
980:
942:
937:
869:
864:
802:
797:
795:Pooper scooper
763:
755:
751:Used in article
744:
740:Freely licensed
719:
711:
703:
685:
677:
657:
646:
628:
620:
609:
564:
523:
522:
521:
511:
509:
505:Article history
444:
438:
347:
321:
316:
310:
305:
299:
294:
288:
283:
277:
272:
233:
230:
227:
224:
223:
175:
143:
122:Knowledge (XXG)
101:
92:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
1639:
1637:
1629:
1628:
1623:
1618:
1613:
1608:
1603:
1598:
1593:
1588:
1583:
1573:
1572:
1516:
1513:
1488:
1485:
1484:
1483:
1438:
1435:
1434:
1433:
1418:
1417:
1416:
1369:
1366:
1349:
1346:
1345:
1344:
1323:
1317:
1286:
1283:
1281:
1280:
1279:
1278:
1277:
1276:
1275:
1274:
1273:
1272:
1271:
1270:
1269:
1268:
1267:
1266:
1265:
1264:
1263:
1262:
1261:
1260:
1259:
1258:
1257:
1256:
1255:
1254:
1253:
1252:
1251:
1250:
1249:
1248:
1247:
1246:
1220:
1219:
1193:
1192:
1191:
1190:
1141:
1140:
1119:
1118:
1117:
1116:
1075:
1074:
1056:
1055:
1030:
1015:
995:
994:
993:
992:
952:
951:
950:
949:
907:
906:
782:
781:
770:
769:
768:
767:
759:
748:
734:
733:
724:
723:
715:
707:
690:
689:
681:
661:
650:
633:
632:
624:
613:
596:
595:
594:
593:
571:
570:
569:
568:
562:
556:
540:
539:
519:
513:
512:
508:
507:
502:
492:
490:
486:
468:
467:
439:
437:
434:
431:
430:
427:
426:
423:
422:
419:
418:
413:
403:
402:
397:
387:
386:
381:
371:
370:
365:
355:
354:
352:
350:
344:
343:
335:
334:
331:
330:
328:
326:
325:
324:
313:
302:
291:
280:
266:
265:
263:
250:
240:
239:
237:
206:
194:
193:
170:
158:
157:
151:
140:
126:
125:
115:
105:
104:
63:
51:
50:
43:the discussion
35:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1638:
1627:
1624:
1622:
1619:
1617:
1614:
1612:
1609:
1607:
1604:
1602:
1599:
1597:
1594:
1592:
1589:
1587:
1584:
1582:
1579:
1578:
1576:
1569:
1568:
1563:
1553:
1545:
1544:
1540:
1536:
1532:
1528:
1524:
1521:
1514:
1512:
1511:
1507:
1503:
1498:
1495:
1492:
1486:
1482:
1477:
1467:
1461:
1456:
1455:
1454:
1453:
1449:
1445:
1436:
1432:
1428:
1424:
1419:
1415:
1410:
1400:
1393:
1392:
1391:
1390:
1389:
1388:
1384:
1380:
1375:
1367:
1365:
1364:
1360:
1356:
1347:
1343:
1339:
1335:
1331:
1324:
1318:
1315:
1311:
1304:
1303:
1302:
1301:
1297:
1293:
1284:
1245:
1241:
1237:
1233:
1228:
1224:
1223:
1222:
1221:
1218:
1214:
1210:
1204:
1199:
1198:
1197:
1196:
1195:
1194:
1189:
1186:
1181:
1175:
1174:
1173:
1169:
1165:
1159:
1155:
1149:
1145:
1144:
1143:
1142:
1139:
1135:
1131:
1127:
1126:
1125:
1124:
1123:
1122:
1121:
1120:
1115:
1112:
1107:
1101:
1100:
1099:
1095:
1091:
1087:
1083:
1079:
1078:
1077:
1076:
1073:
1069:
1065:
1060:
1059:
1058:
1057:
1054:
1050:
1046:
1042:
1036:
1031:
1029:
1025:
1021:
1016:
1014:
1010:
1006:
1003:
999:
998:
997:
996:
991:
988:
983:
977:
976:
975:
971:
967:
962:
958:
957:
956:
955:
954:
953:
948:
945:
940:
933:
929:
928:
927:
923:
919:
915:
911:
910:
909:
908:
905:
901:
897:
893:
889:
885:
881:
877:
876:
875:
872:
867:
861:
857:
853:
849:
845:
841:
840:
839:
835:
831:
827:
826:
825:
821:
817:
813:
812:
811:
810:
809:
808:
805:
800:
793:
788:
779:
776:
775:
760:
752:
749:
741:
738:
737:
736:
735:
731:
728:
727:
716:
709:Interesting:
708:
700:
697:
696:
695:
694:
682:
674:
670:
666:
662:
654:
651:
643:
640:
639:
638:
637:
625:
617:
614:
606:
603:
602:
601:
600:
592:
591:
590:
589:
588:
585:
581:
577:
567:
560:
557:
554:
550:
549:
544:
543:
542:
541:
538:
536:
532:
531:
525:
524:
517:
506:
503:
501:
497:
494:
493:
489:
487:
485:
481:
477:
473:
466:
464:
460:
456:
452:
447:
441:
440:
435:
417:
409:
405:
404:
401:
393:
389:
388:
385:
377:
373:
372:
369:
361:
357:
356:
353:
351:
346:
345:
340:
336:
329:
327:
322:criterion met
314:
311:criterion met
303:
300:criterion met
292:
289:criterion met
281:
278:criterion met
270:
269:
268:
267:
264:
261:
260:
254:
251:
246:
242:
241:
238:
221:
217:
213:
212:
207:
204:
200:
199:
195:
191:
190:Post-Cold War
187:
186:United States
183:
182:North America
179:
174:
171:
168:
164:
159:
155:
149:
141:
137:
132:
131:
116:
113:
109:
100:
96:
95:
88:
85:
84:
82:
78:
77:
72:
68:
64:
61:
57:
56:
48:
44:
40:
36:
33:
29:
28:
19:
1546:
1525:
1522:
1518:
1499:
1496:
1493:
1490:
1440:
1373:
1371:
1351:
1292:VIOLENTRULER
1288:
1231:
1040:
891:
859:
847:
816:StudiesWorld
786:
785:
777:
729:
692:
691:
635:
634:
598:
597:
572:
558:
552:
546:
534:
528:
526:
488:
471:
469:
462:
454:
450:
445:
442:
257:
209:
154:WikiProjects
98:
90:
87:Did you know
86:
76:Did you know
74:
67:AGM-183 ARRW
66:
65:A fact from
46:
1041:China Times
914:BlueMoonset
896:BlueMoonset
858:, rule D5:
616:Long enough
574:Created by
563:Forthcoming
298:Structure:
81:check views
1575:Categories
1379:Tamoraboys
1236:Flibirigit
1230:Approving
1209:Flibirigit
1164:Flibirigit
852:discussion
669:plagiarism
605:New enough
553:(pictured)
535:(pictured)
99:(pictured)
1368:Top speed
1334:Chetsford
1328:Articles
1184:(discuss)
1158:Chetsford
1110:(discuss)
1064:Chetsford
1035:Chetsford
1020:Chetsford
986:(discuss)
943:(discuss)
918:Chetsford
884:Chetsford
870:(discuss)
830:Chetsford
803:(discuss)
576:Chetsford
71:Main Page
1535:Gøøse060
1527:Gøøse060
1502:YEEETER0
1179:Hawkeye7
1154:Hawkeye7
1105:Hawkeye7
1082:Hawkeye7
981:Hawkeye7
938:Hawkeye7
888:Hawkeye7
865:Hawkeye7
798:Hawkeye7
780:: Done.
663:Free of
559:Reviewed
548:AGM-183A
472:promoted
259:criteria
178:Aviation
93:AGM-183A
39:deletion
1523:Thanks
1374:Average
1203:Yoninah
1130:Yoninah
1090:Yoninah
1045:Yoninah
1005:Yoninah
966:Yoninah
848:On hold
787:Overall
653:Neutral
496:Comment
476:Yoninah
144:B-class
73:in the
1560:Jester
1474:Jester
1460:by TWZ
1407:Jester
850:until
730:Image:
671:, and
150:scale.
1487:Range
1348:F-15?
1314:WP:OR
1310:WP:RS
699:Cited
1557:SWAT
1539:talk
1531:talk
1506:talk
1471:SWAT
1448:talk
1427:talk
1404:SWAT
1383:talk
1359:talk
1338:talk
1296:talk
1240:talk
1232:ALT1
1213:talk
1168:talk
1156:and
1134:talk
1094:talk
1068:talk
1049:talk
1024:talk
1009:talk
970:talk
922:talk
900:talk
834:talk
820:talk
580:talk
500:view
480:talk
47:keep
45:was
892:not
778:QPQ
498:or
474:by
457:or
1577::
1541:)
1533:)
1508:)
1450:)
1429:)
1385:)
1361:)
1340:)
1332:.
1298:)
1242:)
1215:)
1170:)
1136:)
1096:)
1070:)
1051:)
1026:)
1011:)
972:)
924:)
902:)
886:,
836:)
822:)
789::
753::
742::
701::
675::
667:,
655::
644::
618::
607::
561::
491:(
482:)
453:,
348:/
188:/
184:/
180:/
176::
1551:⇒
1537:(
1529:(
1504:(
1465:⇒
1446:(
1425:(
1398:⇒
1381:(
1357:(
1336:(
1294:(
1238:(
1211:(
1205::
1201:@
1166:(
1160::
1152:@
1132:(
1092:(
1066:(
1047:(
1037::
1033:@
1022:(
1007:(
968:(
920:(
898:(
832:(
818:(
586:.
578:(
555:?
537:?
510:)
478:(
465:.
222:.
156::
114:.
102:?
49:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
