Talk:Super Mario Bros. Wonder

1598:

only added this information twice; this thread's wording almost makes my behavior seem disruptive. The first time, I included a whole paragraph about the coincidence, but when Sergecross73 reverted it, leaving an edit summary that said " There might be something to mention here, but ", I was encouraged to try again by writing something more concise, saying in my edit summary that " if this gets reverted again, I'll just take it to the talk page instead of making another bold edit". My question now is: how much of the information from the given sources belongs in this article? I included the information just because I supposed that something mentioned by reliable sources

1155: 562: 1396:

Light-Blue Yoshi), and Nabbit (Both Nabbit and the yoshis can't be hurt by enemies, but the latter group can also swallow enemies and flutter jump). While there's always the possibility of a secret character being tucked away somewhere in the final release, it's probably safe to mention these newly revealed additions in the article. There's also a "Random" option at the bottom of the select screen to choose a random character.

261: 634: 116: 981: 64: 185: 158: 968: 195: 22: 78: 53: 3107:

what mattered the most (for me). Whether it remains in the article here or not is either fine by me too, it is trivia and it'd probably have a better home in other places like fan wikis/pages. People who would be interested in this would check those out too anyway. So, we can leave it like that as far as I am concerned. That's all I have to say.

2044: 2971:

Also, I feel that the comparison to other unrelated Mario games developed by a much different development team for a totally different console is unnecessary and burdensome for the article. There's no real value in that information. Now, if there was another game within a series specifically that did

2967:

The usual course of action here would be to use the aggregate percentage score and leave out any descriptive words from MetaCritic/OpenCritic such as "superb" or "terrible" etc,. because it gives readers a better understanding of what the overall reception was by seeing the aggregate percentage score

2576:

says it far better than I can, but you should not be trying to write in a way that "emphasizes" anything that reliable sources do not. I do not support the proposed wording, because it is factually incorrect; someone who reads only the first part of that sentence would walk away misinformed, and even

1905:

In the ordered list in my above comment, I did explain what I want added and why, using arguments other that the mere fact that it was published. I would like you to respond to those arguments. I am very sorry for the confusion I caused when I falsely said that "I fully support the new wording"; I do

1578:

should generally be deleted outright, which I already tried, but was reverted, so I was seeing if a compromise was more appropriate. But trimming it too far? What else would you have it say? Similar games released in similar time frames, but there was no particular reason for it. Such a basic concept

1341:

The article makes no mention of "only" six either, it just lists the six that have been announced. We likely won't know the final number until the game is released, so I don't think that it makes sense to ask for a citation that likely doesn't exist yet. It would probably make more sense to tweak the

3106:

My final two cents, after this no further input from me: Given the controversial nature of this point, frankly I'm okay with whatever. If anyone wants to restore it in any way, be my guest, that's fine by me. It was verified as correct and acknowledged regardless of the way it was written, which was

3087:

Not the highest 2D Mario, highest 2D Mario since whatever past entry: that's correct and fair enough, that's why I worded it the way I worded at the start (alongside what I mentioned to the user just above), since the saying it's the second best comes across as not noteworthy enough. "Highest-rated

2880:

I never claimed that I didn't change anything. In fact, the very first thing I said at the beginning was: "it's ridiculous to claim that it was "incorrect" when saying "it is the highest rated since" and "the highest rated behind" means the same thing in the end" Again, I'll mention it for you, for

2196:

Also frankly I believe this small line is causing unnecessary drama, it's ridiculous to claim that it was "incorrect" when saying "it is the highest rated since" and "the highest rated behind" means the same thing in the end and just changing that and the source from searching "Super Mario Bros" to

1931:

I support briefly noting the rivalry. I don't see much potential for misunderstandings about the coincidence part when the "coincidence" part in this situation essentially means "there's no real story nor planning behind this release timeframe" here, but if you feel compelled to include "per Tezuka

1597:

This information is covered in reliable sources and was commented on by both games' producers. For both of those reasons, I believe that the information warrants inclusion in some capacity, so I had added it. I do realize that I may have gotten too carried away though. To set the record straight, I

1517:

I'm trying to understand the purpose of adding this content to the article. I'd understand if there was something else going on here. Like it being done strategically, or if one beats it in sales or something. But there's nothing of importance here. The source brings it up, and the response is more

3083:

The reason why I compared it with the 2D games is because they're officially considered its own separate thing compared to the 3D games. I don't think there should be any problem with that because that's the way they're officially separated and consider noteworthy enough if a new game appears that

3033:

My two cents - there's too many exceptions to make this a noteworthy factoid. It's not highest rated Mario game. It's not highest rated Super Mario game. It's not even highest rated 2D Mario. It's highest 2D Mario since whatever past entry. And the claim is weaker further by the fact that often go

2895:

The first response you made here was just plain vindictive and come across as plain aggressive, and that's why I answered the same way so you could see for yourself. You took that I mentioned the false claim was ridiculous (and still is) personally. You're not not obliged to correct anything, but

2665:

statement, but it doesn't fully convince me. I don't think comparing it to a port is as noteworthy as comparing it to a new game, when both statements mean the same thing and it's just the implication that is changed. And even then, wording the comparison like that doesn't comprehend all 2D games

1395:

The Super Mario Bros. Wonder Direct posted on August 31st by Nintendo of America on Youtube shows a character select screen with 13 total characters: 7 "standard" characters (Mario, Luigi, Princess Peach, Princess Daisy, Blue Toad, Yellow Toad, Toadette), 4 Yoshis (Yoshi, Red Yoshi, Yellow Yoshi,

1236:

The phrase "It is the first traditional side-scrolling Super Mario game since New Super Mario Bros. U (2012)" is in both the introduction and the "Release" section. I have tried on 2 occasions to remove it but it keeps getting reverted. Is it really needed to be mentioned twice? It doesn't seem

3166:

Yeah, that was making the rounds in the news the other day. I didn't bother adding it since it didn't say how much it sold or how much the previous record holder sold. It's kind of an empty accomplishment without knowing any of the details. They'll likely release actual figures in the coming

1814:

Both producers commented on the coincidence. This is worth mentioning because it gives weight to what is already stated. Right now, the information may be read as though it was simply mentioned by media organizations, not brought up in an interview with people significant to both

1810:

I take back what I said earlier about fully supporting the current wording. What I meant to say is that I am satisfied with it for now, but I do not regard this discussion as entirely settled. There are two facts I would still like to gain consensus for adding to this article:

2795:

And yes, I plan to go with the consensus either way, and yes I'd prefer the way it was initially worded because of what I said before but it doesn't matter to me that much, what matters to me the most is that it stays (and it will stay) because it is a proven fact regardless.

1282:

a few days ago, I made a request for citation of the idea that there are exactly 6 player characters, as - as far as I know - this information has never been given by official sources. Only 6 characters have been shown, but it has not been confirmed that there aren't more

1180:

I am FerDeLancer. I attempted to create an article for this myself, but my computer decided to crash on me. My pc literally caused me not to be able to type, and I lost everything. I would be happy to help with the growth of this page, to avenge my fallen stub article.

2348:, and there really isn't any standard on whether OpenCritic should only list the percentage or both that and the website rating description, some do, others don't (and several don't list OpenCritic), so then either way is fine so the "and a "Mighty" approval rating on 2708:, changed it here, and try to make it look like you are correct now. You will leave it that way anyway if there is a consensus/users who disagree with you (and they do). You can't change the information because you don't like the fact that what is listed is a "port". 2567:

Maybe it could be worded in a better/more important (or cooler) way that emphasizes how big the milestone is, that was my intention when I added it in the first place anyway, to show how great the reviews were, but I don't think saying it like that conveys

2540:

623: 2193:(94), with no other games released in between, it's the same claim). And I worded it like that because comparing it with a new game instead of a port is much more notable, and what readers would like to know the most is how it compares to those games. 994: 2352:, where 98% of reviews recommend the game" could both be mentioned and be added back if anyone wants (for the record, either way is fine by me, I'm interested in the other change, but this being removed for no reason caught my eye as well). 2940:

Don't worry, it's not your fault at all, in fact it's the opposite, I thank you for your interest, recognizing its value, and actually trying to fix it, instead of just deleting the good faith edit and arbitrarily calling it "incorrect"/"a

575: 2997:

That's also why I picked New Super Mario Bros., though it's labeled as it's own thing, this game shares staff members with it and the rest of the New Super Mario Bros. series, that's why I considered it noteworthy enough to put it that

2296:

as an example again, that "a "Strong" approval rating on OpenCritic" should be changed to "On OpenCritic, 57% of critics recommend", shouldn't it? Otherwise it's strange that the website rating description is listed there but not here.

2792:, and now you're just criticizing the addition I made in the first place, you're so helpful. I have noticed your aggressiveness, that's why I called it ridiculous. But I'll leave it at that, I do not plan to engage in that behavior. 1018: 1112: 587: 2209:) and the first editor who reverted due to claiming it was such was wrong, that's why I first reverted it. Only to have it reverted again due to a false claim of it being "incorrect", which is why I reverted it again. 1856:

Can you explain what extensions you'd like to add, and what purpose it serves to the reader? So much of the argument seems to hinge on "well they published it" rather than what its actual benefit is to the reader?

452: 2315:

as some sort of standard to aspire to though. Much like this article (and any popular new release) there's a wide variety of both good and misguided edits happening because the games just came out. Look to

1006: 2845:" ). I'm not obliged to correct every mistake made by other editors. The other editor added correct info without a source and then I added the source for it. You are falsely blaming others' actions and 1579:

doesn't require a lengthy direct quote. We're really only supposed to be using direct quotes when there's an idea that can't properly be conveyed through paraphrasing. There's nothing like that here.

1327:

The source makes no indication that these are the only characters playable in the game, as the article states, and thus a citation, or removal, is required as the information is entirely unsourced

1217:

Details are scarce right now, but please refrain from adding speculation and ensure information is verifiable within citations themselves. I'll do my best to check any new additions for accuracy.

599: 361: 2235:". What's the point of that? It's just describing what how the website itself rates it like the "universal acclaim" on Metacritic. It's a pointless removal. For the record, other pages such as 611: 1076: 387: 1043: 1030: 426: 2467:

games; thank you for correcting me on that. My problem with the former—while it may not be chronocentric—is that it leaves more room for speculation; it doesn't say what happened before

2725: 2741: 2814:

with a source and uses your edit diff to show your mistake, you should not keep trying what you are doing right now. That link showing your edit is definitely you (which changed from

1094: 89:. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the 2285:

is useful for newer games. Only use OpenCritic's Critics Recommend metric normally. Do not include OpenCritic's Top Critic Average metric in articles that have a Metacritic score.

2428:. As mentioned before it's just "the highest since", meaning just that fact, that could have been under any other period of time. Also saying that the latter is compared to all 465: 2889:, it's the same placement and and same score. Not incorrect and not a mistake. If anything it's just the changing the wording and what was searched, which means the same thing. 1766:

providing much more, along the lines of what I was envisioning, citing more sources and even including a comparison to the 1990s console wars, which I had considered doing. –

1100: 3125:

like we're supposed to, it shouldn't have been in the article, as it was contested by multiple editors and never found a consensus for inclusion. Just an FYI for next time.

2993:

another game within a series specifically that did either much better or poorer than this one, then I think it would be fair to make that comparison between those two titles

1827:

was quite excessive; I guess I was just too excited. If there are no objections, once consensus is gained for including or excluding the above facts, I will also update the

1669:

Okay, then I'm fine too then. I'm okay with a brief mention, I just felt the original version was an awful lot of text and quotes to essentially say "it was a coincidence".

336: 413: 1518:

or less "Yeah man crazy coincidence." Outside of maybe a much shorter, more streamlined sentence noting it was a coincidental, I don't see the need for all this here.

478: 1818:

Journalists compared the situation to the rivalry from the 1990s. As Sergecross73 said, "oting the old rivalry helps explain why it's brought up in the first place".

1070: 1062: 439: 251: 1792:

Noting the old rivalry helps explain why it's brought up in the first place, but the rest is just the same old drawn out wording for saying it was a coincidence.

1106: 1088: 90: 85: 58: 3321: 1726:

The small note works good enough I guess, my initial issue was that I was trimmed wayyy to much but as a small kinda "hey look at this fun thing" works for me.

2765:

ports, and I kept them mind too but didn't put another source to it's page as to not clutter the page (I guess this is the "mistake" you're so keen on), but I

1118: 497: 374: 270: 168: 1286:

today, I checked to see if a citation had been added, but one had not. Not only had one not been added, my cn had also been removed and the page edit locked

1056: 3336: 869: 241: 2841: 2661: 2619: 2607: 2548: 2527: 2189: 2170: 1535:

This would probably work better in a trivia section, but either way you are half right the comment is unnecessary but it should not be trimmed THAT much

140: 803: 400: 3351: 2726:

https://web.archive.org/web/20231018225906/https://www.metacritic.com/search/%22Super%20Mario%20Bros.%22/?page=1&sortBy=META_SCORE&category=13

2742:

https://web.archive.org/web/20231018225907/https://www.metacritic.com/search/%22Super%20Mario%20Maker%22/?page=1&sortBy=META_SCORE&category=1

331: 217: 1066: 2948:. Your analysis was on point, and like I said I agree that the initial wording may have caused confusion and I'd be fine with the other way too. 3088:

non-remake mainline 2D Mario game" was good IMO too, remakes/ports are not as noteworthy as new games so I see the value in putting it that way.

2491:

on Metacritic. The latter, however, dispels any such ambiguity. It may sound a bit less cool, but it communicates the information far better. –

2968:

since that's how we usually write these reception sections on video game articles. It promotes uniformity and clarity across the encyclopedia.

3346: 3069: 2588: 2502: 2406: 2109: 2062: 2011: 1917: 1842: 1777: 1696: 1654: 1613: 617: 3331: 3241:

Just provide a link to a website reporting this. I can't find any sources saying this, so I'm asking you to show me where you got it from.

2849:

ness instead of admitting your mistake and pretend like you didn't change anything while trying to mislead the situation when this game is

2628:

But I understand your point, that readers that only the first part of that sentence would walk away misinformed. Also I believe it follows

2516:

Fair enough, you mentioned a good point. Just one thing though, I have to point out that both statements link to their respective articles:

2197:

searching "Super Mario" automatically makes it correct. Also Super Mario Bros. is how Nintendo officially names the 2D Mario games as seen

1399: 1203: 745: 299: 284: 208: 163: 988: 3341: 2983: 1981:

revealed that this was a coincidence, despite how long it had been since either franchise had had a 2D entry. It was the first time a

1289:

I am making a post here now in place of that removed cn as I cannot readd it. Citation is needed here, and none had been added at all

835: 2629: 2573: 63: 3326: 533: 1824: 569: 1164: 33: 1978: 1509: 1256:

works. We could probably try varying the wording a bit, but some repetition between the intro (lead) and the article body is

1012: 134: 2972:

either much better or poorer than this one, then I think it would be fair to make that comparison between those two titles.

1992: 3316: 697: 783: 539: 1082: 741: 2892:

Also I'm not blaming anyone or refusing to acknowledge a mistake. You should look in a mirror before claiming that.

2311:

I'm not saying anything is right or wrong, I'm just saying following the guidance is the way to go. I'd stop using

3065: 2931: 2584: 2498: 2402: 2105: 2058: 2007: 1913: 1838: 1773: 1692: 1650: 1609: 855: 831: 130: 2212:

Well, now I'm all ears, I won't change it further until a consensus is hopefully reached. Now please, give me a

1324:

I was sure to read that before making this comment, as well as just now in this reply in case I missed something

2432:

games is flawed because MC only covers 2D games since the GBA era so the NES/SNES/GB games are not represented.

1403: 1200: 655: 581: 561: 39: 1602:

by both games' producers is important enough, but perhaps I was wrong, and if so I am willing to learn why. –

3197:

Nintendo released their latest sales update, and it confirms that the game has 4.3 Million units worldwide.

2128: 1878: 1731: 1632: 1540: 1454: 1423: 1242: 1036: 1024: 921: 901: 543: 3282: 3247: 3217: 3173: 3131: 3040: 2979: 2330: 2265: 2231:

Also, another editor is adamant on removing the line that says that it has "a "Mighty" approval rating on

2031: 1938: 1893: 1863: 1798: 1716: 1675: 1585: 1524: 1439: 1348: 1314: 1266: 1222: 422: 3100: 2479:

is important rather than the unmentioned game that preceded it. As far as the reader knows, every single

2206: 3273: 3112: 3091:

Anyway, while we were discussing things here, the same other editor that hasn't checked this discussion

3006: 2953: 2923: 2905: 2801: 2671: 2640: 2556: 2520: 2472: 2454: 2440: 2357: 2302: 2246: 2221: 2183: 2154: 2124: 2095: 1874: 1727: 1628: 1563: 1550: 1536: 1475: 1433:

I'd wait until the game is out. It's only a few days away, and it's not like this is a plot heavy game.

1196:

You can help by just working on the article like everyone else, no need to make some statement about it

1186: 216:

on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

1450: 1419: 1380: 1332: 1294: 3108: 3002: 2964: 2949: 2901: 2797: 2667: 2636: 2552: 2450: 2436: 2353: 2298: 2242: 2217: 3059: 3022: 3018: 2945: 2927: 2578: 2492: 2396: 2198: 2099: 2052: 2001: 1907: 1832: 1767: 1686: 1644: 1603: 1218: 693: 3259: 3228: 3198: 3184: 3152: 2719:

I have never changed my what I said about that subject, it's still correct and there's no "mistake":

980: 21: 3263: 3232: 3202: 3188: 3156: 1512:

noted that it had been a long time since either of the games' respective series had had a 2D entry.

1197: 779: 2276: 2256: 1575: 1553: 3183:

They said that they’re next financial report is on Monday, so we’ll see how much they sold then.

2632:, it's the same thing worded differently, it's not sugarcoating it or mentioning anything untrue. 2141:

Highest-rated 2D Super Mario game on MetaCritic since New Super Mario Bros./Super Mario Advance 4

1987: 1762:? Right now, the two articles are inconsistent in their levels of detail about the subject, with 1643:

I just noticed that the wording has been changed somewhat, and I fully support the new wording. –

1342:

wording to be correct to what we can verify now. Feel free to suggest wording to clarify things.

1238: 707: 461: 200: 2425: 2392: 2290:

I take it that Critics Recommend metric normally means only listing the percentage, then, using

1000: 529: 3151:

According to Nintendo of Europe, the game had become the fastest selling Mario game in Europe.

2900:

think it's a "mistake" and not even point what the "mistake" is until you're pressed to do it.

3277: 3242: 3212: 3168: 3126: 3121:

While I agree the reverting editor should have been commenting here too, if we were following

3035: 2973: 2870: 2709: 2325: 2260: 2026: 1951:, what do you think of something like this? If you accept it, consider adding it yourself per 1948: 1933: 1888: 1858: 1793: 1748: 1711: 1670: 1580: 1519: 1434: 1343: 1309: 1261: 1154: 1253: 2292: 2237: 2090: 1961: 1759: 1752: 1556: 1493: 1182: 883: 3122: 1952: 1165:

https://www.npr.org/2023/08/31/1196990890/super-mario-bros-wonder-nintendo-prevew-interview

949: 448: 3096: 2345: 2341: 2321: 2317: 2202: 2177:

I think that is an unnecessary change that means the same thing in the end (counting 2D

2421: 2388: 897: 687: 669: 409: 2526:"It is the second highest-rated 2D Super Mario game on the website/Metacritic, behind 3310: 2383:

to games released within some arbitrary time frame, when it could be compared to all

1906:

like it, but I think it could be expanded upon with the two things mentioned above. –

841: 789: 713: 474: 3287: 3267: 3252: 3236: 3222: 3206: 3192: 3178: 3160: 3136: 3116: 3078: 3045: 3026: 3010: 2987: 2957: 2935: 2909: 2875: 2805: 2714: 2675: 2644: 2597: 2560: 2511: 2458: 2444: 2415: 2361: 2335: 2306: 2270: 2250: 2225: 2132: 2118: 2071: 2036: 2020: 1943: 1926: 1898: 1882: 1868: 1851: 1803: 1786: 1735: 1721: 1705: 1680: 1663: 1636: 1627:

Oh and sorry, you wanted to put a silly comment and it has devolved into chaos lol.

1622: 1590: 1570: 1544: 1529: 1458: 1444: 1427: 1407: 1384: 1353: 1336: 1319: 1298: 1271: 1246: 1226: 1206: 1190: 1376: 1328: 1290: 751: 727: 435: 260: 1873:

Dude why are we still arguing, I thought that we already settled everything what

1160:

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:

3001:

Also, fair enough about what you mentioned in the first paragraph, that's fine.

2449:

Also I believe "highest rated since" sounds better than "second highest rated".

817: 641: 523: 519: 2547:"It is the highest-rated 2D Super Mario game on the website/Metacritic, after 2349: 2282: 2232: 1362:"the player takes control of one of a number of playable characters, such as:" 907: 593: 493: 370: 292: 213: 190: 115: 2922:

Oops! Looks like I started an argument. Anyways, I'd prefer the latter since

2881:

one last time: It is the same claim in the end. The highest rated game since

2606:"It is the highest-rated 2D Super Mario game on the website/Metacritic after 2519:"It is the highest rated 2D Super Mario game on the website/Metacritic since 1418:

Should we add plot details to the page or wait until release to add details?

2435:

That said, I'll go with the consensus, just mentioning that for the record.

765: 703: 605: 184: 157: 2788:

Also, you could have changed it if you knew the "mistake" but you didn't.

1685:

Okay. I suppose consensus has been reached for the current wording then? –

357: 2773:, the hard fact still stands, this game is the highest rated game since 1887:

Yes, I thought so too, I'm also confused and tired of this discussion.

935: 396: 383: 2635:

Well, let's wait and see if anyone can come up with something else.

2145:

Regarding this addition to the reception, can't we just leave it as

77: 52: 2603:

It's still factually correct, as it also is saying the same thing.

3227:

I don’t know how to do that, but there are reports claiming this.

2704:

You realized your mistake after I added the source verifying your

1710:

Unless Alice gives more specifics, I'd say we're all set for now.

683: 2324:

for articles that are generally good stardards to work towards.

1966: 1497: 1504:. Takashi Tezuka called this "an interesting coincidence", and 3017:"Highest-rated non-remake mainline 2D Mario game" how is this 1149: 15: 3147:

Super Mario Bros Wonder fastest selling Mario game in Europe.

2577:

someone who reads the whole sentence may still be confused. –

1823:

I understand the point being made about "drawn out wording";

3034:

years (or decades) without a new 2D entry. Trim the trivia.

1991:

game had been released close to one another since the 1990s

1358:

I would personally change it to something along the lines of

259: 114: 1751:, what do you think of the similar paragraph currently at 3211:

Can you provide a reliable source for 4.3 million sold?

2734:

series, which like I said is how Nintendo treats the 2D

1278:

Removal of the Citation Request for Number of Characters

3092: 2815: 2789: 2770: 2685: 1305: 1123: 955: 941: 927: 913: 889: 875: 861: 847: 823: 809: 795: 771: 757: 733: 719: 675: 661: 647: 341: 326: 321: 316: 311: 306: 125: 3257: 2463:

You are right about the latter not representing all

2216:

reason why it can't stay like that if there is one.

212:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 2680:Really? You were actually insisting on this being 2201:. And I may remind you that this doesn't count as 2123:Ah yes the sequel of the exact same argument lol. 2094:, TheJoebro64 has reverted my edit, so I started 99:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Articles for creation 2861:. It is, however, the (second) highest-rated 2D 2836:highest-rated 2D Super Mario game on the website 2896:you're not entitled to keep claiming something 2834:to other editor's correct addition: "It is the 2659:If there's no better alterative I'll leave the 2565: 2340:I understand. Well, I checked some recent game 1965:, a similar 2D side-scrolling platform game by 1958: 1496:, a similar 2D side-scrolling platform game by 2857:game" or "the highest rated game" on MC since 1488:Additions to this effect keep getting added: 8: 3050:This is reasonable as well. Even comparing 2722:From the sources in the mentioned revision: 2666:because Metacritic doesn't cover them all. 1372:the latter implying the existence of only 6 870:Lego Indiana Jones: The Original Adventures 2867:Super Mario Advance 4: Super Mario Bros. 3 2842:Super Mario Advance 4: Super Mario Bros. 3 2662:Super Mario Advance 4: Super Mario Bros. 3 2620:Super Mario Advance 4: Super Mario Bros. 3 2608:Super Mario Advance 4: Super Mario Bros. 3 2549:Super Mario Advance 4: Super Mario Bros. 3 2528:Super Mario Advance 4: Super Mario Bros. 3 2190:Super Mario Advance 4: Super Mario Bros. 3 2171:Super Mario Advance 4: Super Mario Bros. 3 279: 152: 102:Template:WikiProject Articles for creation 83:This article was reviewed by member(s) of 47: 1375:sorry for my confusion with this wording 2420:It's not an arbitrary period of time or 2750:series, which are the other kind of 2D 2617:game on the website/Metacritic, behind 2379:. What reason is there to only compare 2168:game on the website/Metacritic, behind 804:Pokémon Sword and Shield Expansion Pass 226:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Video games 154: 49: 19: 3274:other sources are reporting it now too 2846: 2811: 2705: 2681: 2600:, edited 03:30, 20 October 2023 (UTC) 1932:and Iizuka" at then end then I guess? 1789:, edited 23:02, 19 October 2023 (UTC) 1666:, edited 18:51, 19 October 2023 (UTC) 2630:Knowledge (XXG):Neutral point of view 2574:Knowledge (XXG):Neutral point of view 2364:, edited 03:38, 20 October 2023 (UTC) 2152:game on the website/Metacritic since 967: 7: 3322:AfC submissions by date/21 June 2023 3272:I don't know about that source, but 633: 619:Five Nights at Freddy's: Help Wanted 206:This article is within the scope of 2865:game on the website (behind) since 2613:"It is the second highest-rated 2D 2387:games? I'm quite sure that kind of 2164:"It is the second highest-rated 2D 1260:- its how its supposed to be done. 304: 38:It is of interest to the following 3337:Mid-importance video game articles 2853:"the highest rated side-scrolling 2810:When someone actually proves your 990:The Legend of Zelda: Majora's Mask 14: 2926:only received favorable reviews. 2885:/second highest rated game after 2818:the highest rated side-scrolling 2688:the highest rated side-scrolling 1365:as opposed to the current wording 86:WikiProject Articles for creation 3352:WikiProject Video games articles 3095:due to once again claiming it's 2746:This one shows the games in the 2730:This one shows the games in the 2042: 1153: 979: 966: 632: 560: 229:Template:WikiProject Video games 193: 183: 156: 76: 62: 51: 20: 2259:for how to handle Open Critic. 246:This article has been rated as 123:This article was accepted from 2187:(89) was released right after 1014:Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare 1: 2790:Another editor had to do that 1969:, was released 3 days before 1500:, was released 3 days before 1408:05:44, 7 September 2023 (UTC) 977: 964: 630: 571:List of generation IX Pokémon 558: 552: 513: 351: 297: 268:This article is supported by 220:and see a list of open tasks. 3347:Nintendo task force articles 3288:13:11, 8 November 2023 (UTC) 3268:02:23, 8 November 2023 (UTC) 3253:02:09, 8 November 2023 (UTC) 3237:02:03, 8 November 2023 (UTC) 3223:01:58, 8 November 2023 (UTC) 3207:01:50, 8 November 2023 (UTC) 3193:22:15, 4 November 2023 (UTC) 3179:21:57, 4 November 2023 (UTC) 3161:21:22, 4 November 2023 (UTC) 3137:13:35, 21 October 2023 (UTC) 3117:02:56, 21 October 2023 (UTC) 3079:22:03, 20 October 2023 (UTC) 3046:13:07, 20 October 2023 (UTC) 3027:12:44, 20 October 2023 (UTC) 3011:02:13, 21 October 2023 (UTC) 2988:11:50, 20 October 2023 (UTC) 2958:02:08, 21 October 2023 (UTC) 2936:10:56, 20 October 2023 (UTC) 2910:02:49, 21 October 2023 (UTC) 2876:10:48, 20 October 2023 (UTC) 2806:07:15, 20 October 2023 (UTC) 2769:check them and their scores 2715:06:41, 20 October 2023 (UTC) 2676:04:56, 20 October 2023 (UTC) 2645:03:44, 20 October 2023 (UTC) 2598:03:26, 20 October 2023 (UTC) 2561:03:15, 20 October 2023 (UTC) 2512:03:04, 20 October 2023 (UTC) 2459:02:44, 20 October 2023 (UTC) 2445:02:42, 20 October 2023 (UTC) 2416:02:35, 20 October 2023 (UTC) 2362:01:58, 20 October 2023 (UTC) 2336:01:39, 20 October 2023 (UTC) 2307:01:27, 20 October 2023 (UTC) 2271:01:16, 20 October 2023 (UTC) 2251:00:08, 20 October 2023 (UTC) 2226:23:57, 19 October 2023 (UTC) 2148:"It is the highest rated 2D 2133:02:19, 22 October 2023 (UTC) 2119:19:45, 21 October 2023 (UTC) 2072:14:54, 21 October 2023 (UTC) 2037:23:26, 20 October 2023 (UTC) 2021:21:48, 20 October 2023 (UTC) 1944:19:57, 20 October 2023 (UTC) 1927:18:59, 20 October 2023 (UTC) 1899:16:09, 20 October 2023 (UTC) 1883:16:06, 20 October 2023 (UTC) 1869:14:54, 20 October 2023 (UTC) 1852:02:19, 20 October 2023 (UTC) 1804:01:13, 20 October 2023 (UTC) 1787:22:52, 19 October 2023 (UTC) 1736:14:35, 20 October 2023 (UTC) 1722:19:08, 19 October 2023 (UTC) 1706:18:59, 19 October 2023 (UTC) 1681:18:53, 19 October 2023 (UTC) 1664:18:51, 19 October 2023 (UTC) 1637:14:36, 20 October 2023 (UTC) 1623:18:40, 19 October 2023 (UTC) 1591:16:50, 19 October 2023 (UTC) 1571:16:36, 19 October 2023 (UTC) 1545:16:28, 19 October 2023 (UTC) 1530:02:46, 19 October 2023 (UTC) 1459:20:24, 17 October 2023 (UTC) 1445:20:19, 17 October 2023 (UTC) 1428:20:17, 17 October 2023 (UTC) 559:Featured content candidates 129:on 21 June 2023 by reviewer 3332:C-Class video game articles 3058:games is still arbitrary. – 2771:when I first made that edit 1414:What about the recent leak. 974:No did you know nominations 3368: 2706:"ridiculous" "false claim" 1473: 1304:I added a source for that 978:Reviews and reassessments 252:project's importance scale 3342:C-Class Nintendo articles 1993:Nintendo–Sega console war 1385:11:12, 26 June 2023 (UTC) 1354:11:08, 26 June 2023 (UTC) 1337:11:01, 26 June 2023 (UTC) 1320:10:56, 26 June 2023 (UTC) 1299:07:28, 26 June 2023 (UTC) 1272:17:37, 23 June 2023 (UTC) 1247:17:33, 23 June 2023 (UTC) 1227:11:51, 22 June 2023 (UTC) 1207:23:43, 21 June 2023 (UTC) 1191:16:29, 21 June 2023 (UTC) 1053: 631:Good article nominations 551: 350: 295: 278: 267: 245: 178: 122: 71: 46: 3327:Accepted AfC submissions 3276:so it's probably legit. 2544:How about something like 2487:could have outperformed 1484:release date coincidence 1482:Super Mario Bros. Wonder 832:The King of Fighters '99 742:Pokémon Sword and Shield 656:Puff-puff (onomatopoeia) 583:Mario Party: The Top 100 2483:game released prior to 1026:A Space for the Unbound 922:The Great Giana Sisters 540:Minecraft – Volume Beta 300:Video games WikiProject 285:Video games WikiProject 271:the Nintendo task force 209:WikiProject Video games 2570: 2205:(instead it counts as 1997: 1831:article accordingly. – 1176:Hello, article creator 1113:translation from japan 856:Fan-made Pokémon games 423:SuperBot Entertainment 264: 119: 28:This article is rated 3075:Feel free to ping me! 2924:New Super Mario Bros. 2887:Super Mario Advance 3 2883:New Super Mario Bros. 2859:New Super Mario Bros. 2828:New Super Mario Bros. 2779:Super Mario Advance 3 2775:New Super Mario Bros. 2698:New Super Mario Bros. 2594:Feel free to ping me! 2521:New Super Mario Bros. 2508:Feel free to ping me! 2485:New Super Mario Bros. 2469:New Super Mario Bros. 2412:Feel free to ping me! 2184:New Super Mario Bros. 2155:New Super Mario Bros. 2115:Feel free to ping me! 2068:Feel free to ping me! 2017:Feel free to ping me! 1923:Feel free to ping me! 1848:Feel free to ping me! 1783:Feel free to ping me! 1702:Feel free to ping me! 1660:Feel free to ping me! 1619:Feel free to ping me! 1252:Please read over how 1213:Unsourced information 1057:Articles that need... 263: 118: 96:Articles for creation 93:for more information. 59:Articles for creation 32:on Knowledge (XXG)'s 3317:C-Class AfC articles 3099:(but it's not, it's 2533:So both are equally 1232:Regarding repetition 694:Shin Megami Tensei V 556:No major discussions 131:Taking Out The Trash 3084:surpasses the rest. 2763:Super Mario Advance 2051:on both articles. – 1953:WP:BRD#Bold (again) 1369:"As one of the six" 1237:necessary. Thanks. 232:video game articles 3103:, read the thing). 2471:, and it links to 1988:Sonic the Hedgehog 780:Yoshi's New Island 462:David Pierce (CEO) 265: 201:Video games portal 120: 34:content assessment 3077: 2873: 2748:Super Mario Maker 2732:Super Mario Bros. 2712: 2596: 2510: 2414: 2241:also mention it. 2117: 2070: 2019: 1925: 1850: 1785: 1704: 1662: 1621: 1173: 1172: 1148: 1147: 1144: 1143: 1140: 1139: 1136: 1135: 1132: 1131: 553:Other discussions 514:Merge discussions 151: 150: 147: 146: 3359: 3285: 3280: 3250: 3245: 3220: 3215: 3176: 3171: 3134: 3129: 3093:deleted it again 3076: 3073: 3062: 3043: 3038: 2871: 2761:mobile game and 2710: 2595: 2592: 2581: 2509: 2506: 2495: 2413: 2410: 2399: 2333: 2328: 2313:Sonic Superstars 2293:Sonic Superstars 2268: 2263: 2238:Sonic Superstars 2116: 2113: 2102: 2091:Sonic Superstars 2069: 2066: 2055: 2050: 2046: 2045: 2034: 2029: 2018: 2015: 2004: 1975:Sonic Superstars 1962:Sonic Superstars 1941: 1936: 1924: 1921: 1910: 1896: 1891: 1866: 1861: 1849: 1846: 1835: 1829:Sonic Superstars 1801: 1796: 1784: 1781: 1770: 1764:Sonic Superstars 1754:Sonic Superstars 1719: 1714: 1703: 1700: 1689: 1678: 1673: 1661: 1658: 1647: 1620: 1617: 1606: 1588: 1583: 1568: 1561: 1527: 1522: 1506:Sonic Superstars 1494:Sonic Superstars 1478:Sonic Superstars 1468:Sonic Superstars 1442: 1437: 1351: 1346: 1317: 1312: 1269: 1264: 1157: 1150: 1040:(NES video game) 983: 970: 969: 965:DYK nominations 958: 944: 930: 916: 892: 884:The Outer Worlds 878: 864: 850: 826: 812: 798: 774: 760: 736: 722: 678: 664: 650: 636: 635: 564: 507: 488: 293: 280: 234: 233: 230: 227: 224: 203: 198: 197: 196: 187: 180: 179: 174: 171: 160: 153: 128: 107: 106: 103: 100: 97: 80: 73: 72: 67: 66: 65: 55: 48: 31: 25: 24: 16: 3367: 3366: 3362: 3361: 3360: 3358: 3357: 3356: 3307: 3306: 3283: 3278: 3248: 3243: 3218: 3213: 3174: 3169: 3167:weeks/months. 3149: 3132: 3127: 3074: 3063: 3060:CopperyMarrow15 3054:to only the 2D 3041: 3036: 2946:CopperyMarrow15 2928:Ryanisgreat4444 2759:Super Mario Run 2593: 2582: 2579:CopperyMarrow15 2507: 2496: 2493:CopperyMarrow15 2411: 2400: 2397:CopperyMarrow15 2331: 2326: 2266: 2261: 2143: 2114: 2103: 2100:CopperyMarrow15 2088:At the article 2067: 2056: 2053:CopperyMarrow15 2043: 2041: 2032: 2027: 2016: 2005: 2002:CopperyMarrow15 1939: 1934: 1922: 1911: 1908:CopperyMarrow15 1894: 1889: 1864: 1859: 1847: 1836: 1833:CopperyMarrow15 1799: 1794: 1782: 1771: 1768:CopperyMarrow15 1717: 1712: 1701: 1690: 1687:CopperyMarrow15 1676: 1671: 1659: 1648: 1645:CopperyMarrow15 1618: 1607: 1604:CopperyMarrow15 1586: 1581: 1564: 1557: 1525: 1520: 1486: 1472: 1440: 1435: 1416: 1349: 1344: 1315: 1310: 1280: 1267: 1262: 1234: 1215: 1178: 1128: 1049: 1002:Pokémon Channel 984: 976: 975: 971: 963: 954: 950:Visions of Mana 940: 926: 912: 888: 874: 860: 846: 822: 808: 794: 770: 756: 732: 718: 674: 660: 646: 637: 629: 565: 557: 554: 549: 530:Pokémon Emerald 515: 512: 505: 486: 449:Super Mario War 353: 346: 303: 231: 228: 225: 222: 221: 199: 194: 192: 172: 166: 124: 104: 101: 98: 95: 94: 61: 29: 12: 11: 5: 3365: 3363: 3355: 3354: 3349: 3344: 3339: 3334: 3329: 3324: 3319: 3309: 3308: 3305: 3304: 3303: 3302: 3301: 3300: 3299: 3298: 3297: 3296: 3295: 3294: 3293: 3292: 3291: 3290: 3148: 3145: 3144: 3143: 3142: 3141: 3140: 3139: 3104: 3089: 3085: 3081: 3030: 3029: 3015: 3014: 3013: 2999: 2995: 2969: 2962: 2961: 2960: 2942: 2920: 2919: 2918: 2917: 2916: 2915: 2914: 2913: 2912: 2893: 2890: 2824:on Metacritic 2793: 2786: 2755: 2744: 2739: 2728: 2723: 2720: 2694:on Metacritic 2657: 2656: 2655: 2654: 2653: 2652: 2651: 2650: 2649: 2648: 2647: 2633: 2626: 2625: 2624: 2611: 2571: 2545: 2542: 2538: 2537:in that sense. 2531: 2524: 2517: 2478: 2461: 2433: 2422:chronocentrism 2389:chronocentrism 2373: 2372: 2371: 2370: 2369: 2368: 2367: 2366: 2365: 2288: 2287: 2286: 2142: 2139: 2138: 2137: 2136: 2135: 2086: 2085: 2084: 2083: 2082: 2081: 2080: 2079: 2078: 2077: 2076: 2075: 2074: 1998: 1979:Takashi Iizuka 1956: 1903: 1902: 1901: 1821: 1820: 1819: 1816: 1808: 1807: 1806: 1746: 1745: 1744: 1743: 1742: 1741: 1740: 1739: 1738: 1641: 1640: 1639: 1601: 1595: 1594: 1593: 1573: 1515: 1514: 1510:Takashi Iizuka 1471: 1465: 1464: 1463: 1462: 1461: 1415: 1412: 1411: 1410: 1400:23.228.173.149 1397: 1393: 1392: 1391: 1390: 1389: 1388: 1387: 1373: 1370: 1366: 1363: 1359: 1325: 1279: 1276: 1275: 1274: 1233: 1230: 1214: 1211: 1210: 1209: 1198:FishandChipper 1177: 1174: 1171: 1170: 1169: 1168: 1167: 1161: 1158: 1146: 1145: 1142: 1141: 1138: 1137: 1134: 1133: 1130: 1129: 1127: 1126: 1121: 1116: 1110: 1104: 1098: 1092: 1086: 1080: 1074: 1054: 1051: 1050: 1048: 1047: 1034: 1022: 1010: 998: 985: 973: 972: 962: 961: 947: 933: 919: 905: 898:Iron Soldier 2 895: 881: 867: 853: 839: 829: 815: 801: 787: 777: 763: 749: 739: 725: 711: 701: 691: 681: 670:Tina Armstrong 667: 653: 638: 628: 627: 615: 603: 591: 579: 566: 555: 550: 548: 547: 537: 527: 516: 511: 510: 491: 472: 459: 446: 433: 420: 410:Minecraft@Home 407: 394: 381: 368: 354: 348: 347: 345: 344: 339: 334: 329: 324: 319: 314: 309: 296: 289: 288: 276: 275: 266: 256: 255: 248:Mid-importance 244: 238: 237: 235: 218:the discussion 205: 204: 188: 176: 175: 173:Mid‑importance 161: 149: 148: 145: 144: 121: 111: 110: 108: 81: 69: 68: 56: 44: 43: 37: 26: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3364: 3353: 3350: 3348: 3345: 3343: 3340: 3338: 3335: 3333: 3330: 3328: 3325: 3323: 3320: 3318: 3315: 3314: 3312: 3289: 3286: 3281: 3275: 3271: 3270: 3269: 3265: 3261: 3258: 3256: 3255: 3254: 3251: 3246: 3240: 3239: 3238: 3234: 3230: 3226: 3225: 3224: 3221: 3216: 3210: 3209: 3208: 3204: 3200: 3196: 3195: 3194: 3190: 3186: 3182: 3181: 3180: 3177: 3172: 3165: 3164: 3163: 3162: 3158: 3154: 3146: 3138: 3135: 3130: 3124: 3120: 3119: 3118: 3114: 3110: 3105: 3102: 3098: 3094: 3090: 3086: 3082: 3080: 3071: 3067: 3061: 3057: 3053: 3049: 3048: 3047: 3044: 3039: 3032: 3031: 3028: 3024: 3020: 3016: 3012: 3008: 3004: 3000: 2996: 2994: 2991: 2990: 2989: 2985: 2981: 2977: 2976: 2970: 2966: 2963: 2959: 2955: 2951: 2947: 2943: 2939: 2938: 2937: 2933: 2929: 2925: 2921: 2911: 2907: 2903: 2899: 2894: 2891: 2888: 2884: 2879: 2878: 2877: 2874: 2868: 2864: 2860: 2856: 2852: 2848: 2844: 2843: 2837: 2833: 2831: 2829: 2823: 2821: 2813: 2812:"false claim" 2809: 2808: 2807: 2803: 2799: 2794: 2791: 2787: 2784: 2780: 2776: 2772: 2768: 2764: 2760: 2757:There's also 2756: 2753: 2749: 2745: 2743: 2740: 2737: 2733: 2729: 2727: 2724: 2721: 2718: 2717: 2716: 2713: 2707: 2703: 2701: 2699: 2693: 2691: 2683: 2679: 2678: 2677: 2673: 2669: 2664: 2663: 2658: 2646: 2642: 2638: 2634: 2631: 2627: 2622: 2621: 2616: 2612: 2609: 2605: 2604: 2602: 2601: 2599: 2590: 2586: 2580: 2575: 2572: 2569: 2564: 2563: 2562: 2558: 2554: 2550: 2546: 2543: 2539: 2536: 2532: 2529: 2525: 2522: 2518: 2515: 2514: 2513: 2504: 2500: 2494: 2490: 2486: 2482: 2476: 2474: 2470: 2466: 2462: 2460: 2456: 2452: 2448: 2447: 2446: 2442: 2438: 2434: 2431: 2427: 2423: 2419: 2418: 2417: 2408: 2404: 2398: 2394: 2390: 2386: 2382: 2378: 2375:I prefer the 2374: 2363: 2359: 2355: 2351: 2347: 2343: 2339: 2338: 2337: 2334: 2329: 2323: 2319: 2314: 2310: 2309: 2308: 2304: 2300: 2295: 2294: 2289: 2284: 2281: 2280: 2278: 2274: 2273: 2272: 2269: 2264: 2258: 2254: 2253: 2252: 2248: 2244: 2240: 2239: 2234: 2230: 2229: 2228: 2227: 2223: 2219: 2215: 2210: 2208: 2204: 2200: 2194: 2192: 2191: 2186: 2185: 2180: 2175: 2173: 2172: 2167: 2162: 2159: 2157: 2156: 2151: 2146: 2140: 2134: 2130: 2126: 2125:Alice was Mad 2122: 2121: 2120: 2111: 2107: 2101: 2097: 2093: 2092: 2087: 2073: 2064: 2060: 2054: 2049: 2040: 2039: 2038: 2035: 2030: 2024: 2023: 2022: 2013: 2009: 2003: 1999: 1996: 1994: 1990: 1989: 1984: 1980: 1976: 1973:. Tezuka and 1972: 1968: 1964: 1963: 1957: 1954: 1950: 1947: 1946: 1945: 1942: 1937: 1930: 1929: 1928: 1919: 1915: 1909: 1904: 1900: 1897: 1892: 1886: 1885: 1884: 1880: 1876: 1875:Alice was Mad 1872: 1871: 1870: 1867: 1862: 1855: 1854: 1853: 1844: 1840: 1834: 1830: 1826: 1822: 1817: 1813: 1812: 1809: 1805: 1802: 1797: 1791: 1790: 1788: 1779: 1775: 1769: 1765: 1761: 1757: 1755: 1750: 1747: 1737: 1733: 1729: 1728:Alice was Mad 1725: 1724: 1723: 1720: 1715: 1709: 1708: 1707: 1698: 1694: 1688: 1684: 1683: 1682: 1679: 1674: 1668: 1667: 1665: 1656: 1652: 1646: 1642: 1638: 1634: 1630: 1629:Alice was Mad 1626: 1625: 1624: 1615: 1611: 1605: 1599: 1596: 1592: 1589: 1584: 1577: 1574: 1572: 1569: 1567: 1562: 1560: 1555: 1552: 1551:Alice was Mad 1548: 1547: 1546: 1542: 1538: 1537:Alice was Mad 1534: 1533: 1532: 1531: 1528: 1523: 1513: 1511: 1505: 1501: 1499: 1495: 1491: 1490: 1489: 1485: 1483: 1479: 1469: 1466: 1460: 1456: 1452: 1448: 1447: 1446: 1443: 1438: 1432: 1431: 1430: 1429: 1425: 1421: 1413: 1409: 1405: 1401: 1398: 1394: 1386: 1382: 1378: 1374: 1371: 1367: 1364: 1360: 1357: 1356: 1355: 1352: 1347: 1340: 1339: 1338: 1334: 1330: 1326: 1323: 1322: 1321: 1318: 1313: 1307: 1303: 1302: 1301: 1300: 1296: 1292: 1287: 1284: 1277: 1273: 1270: 1265: 1259: 1255: 1251: 1250: 1249: 1248: 1244: 1240: 1239:Nintentoad125 1231: 1229: 1228: 1224: 1220: 1212: 1208: 1205: 1202: 1199: 1195: 1194: 1193: 1192: 1188: 1184: 1175: 1166: 1163: 1162: 1159: 1156: 1152: 1151: 1125: 1122: 1120: 1117: 1114: 1111: 1108: 1105: 1102: 1099: 1096: 1093: 1090: 1087: 1084: 1081: 1078: 1075: 1072: 1068: 1064: 1061: 1060: 1059: 1058: 1052: 1045: 1041: 1039: 1035: 1032: 1028: 1027: 1023: 1020: 1016: 1015: 1011: 1008: 1004: 1003: 999: 996: 992: 991: 987: 986: 982: 959: 957: 951: 948: 945: 943: 937: 934: 931: 929: 923: 920: 917: 915: 909: 906: 903: 899: 896: 893: 891: 885: 882: 879: 877: 871: 868: 865: 863: 857: 854: 851: 849: 843: 842:Hotline Miami 840: 837: 833: 830: 827: 825: 819: 816: 813: 811: 805: 802: 799: 797: 791: 790:Dr Disrespect 788: 785: 781: 778: 775: 773: 767: 764: 761: 759: 753: 750: 747: 743: 740: 737: 735: 729: 726: 723: 721: 715: 714:Kim Kitsuragi 712: 709: 705: 702: 699: 695: 692: 689: 685: 682: 679: 677: 671: 668: 665: 663: 657: 654: 651: 649: 643: 640: 639: 625: 621: 620: 616: 613: 609: 608: 604: 601: 597: 596: 592: 589: 585: 584: 580: 577: 573: 572: 568: 567: 563: 545: 541: 538: 535: 531: 528: 525: 521: 518: 517: 508: 502: 500: 495: 492: 489: 483: 481: 476: 475:Covet Fashion 473: 470: 468: 463: 460: 457: 455: 450: 447: 444: 442: 437: 434: 431: 429: 424: 421: 418: 416: 411: 408: 405: 403: 398: 395: 392: 390: 385: 382: 379: 377: 372: 369: 366: 364: 359: 356: 355: 349: 343: 340: 338: 335: 333: 330: 328: 325: 323: 320: 318: 315: 313: 310: 308: 305: 301: 294: 291: 290: 286: 282: 281: 277: 273: 272: 262: 258: 257: 253: 249: 243: 240: 239: 236: 219: 215: 211: 210: 202: 191: 189: 186: 182: 181: 177: 170: 165: 162: 159: 155: 142: 139: 136: 132: 127: 117: 113: 112: 109: 92: 88: 87: 82: 79: 75: 74: 70: 60: 57: 54: 50: 45: 41: 35: 27: 23: 18: 17: 3279:Sergecross73 3244:Sergecross73 3214:Sergecross73 3170:Sergecross73 3150: 3128:Sergecross73 3101:WP:COUNTSORT 3055: 3051: 3037:Sergecross73 2992: 2974: 2965:@MateoEditor 2897: 2886: 2882: 2866: 2862: 2858: 2854: 2850: 2847:"aggressive" 2839: 2838:/Metacritic 2835: 2827: 2825: 2819: 2817: 2782: 2778: 2774: 2766: 2762: 2758: 2751: 2747: 2735: 2731: 2697: 2695: 2689: 2687: 2660: 2618: 2614: 2566: 2534: 2488: 2484: 2480: 2468: 2464: 2429: 2391:falls under 2384: 2380: 2376: 2327:Sergecross73 2312: 2291: 2262:Sergecross73 2236: 2213: 2211: 2207:WP:COUNTSORT 2195: 2188: 2182: 2181:games only, 2178: 2176: 2169: 2165: 2163: 2161:instead of 2160: 2153: 2149: 2147: 2144: 2096:a discussion 2089: 2047: 2028:Sergecross73 1986: 1982: 1977:'s producer 1974: 1970: 1960: 1959: 1949:Sergecross73 1935:Sergecross73 1890:Sergecross73 1860:Sergecross73 1828: 1825:the original 1795:Sergecross73 1763: 1753: 1749:Sergecross73 1713:Sergecross73 1672:Sergecross73 1582:Sergecross73 1565: 1558: 1521:Sergecross73 1516: 1508:'s director 1507: 1503: 1492: 1487: 1481: 1477: 1467: 1451:WonderFinale 1436:Sergecross73 1420:WonderFinale 1417: 1345:Sergecross73 1311:Sergecross73 1306:in this edit 1288: 1285: 1281: 1263:Sergecross73 1257: 1235: 1216: 1179: 1077:reassessment 1055: 1037: 1025: 1013: 1001: 989: 953: 939: 925: 911: 887: 873: 859: 845: 821: 807: 793: 769: 755: 752:Pixel Piracy 731: 728:Miner 2049er 717: 673: 659: 645: 618: 606: 594: 582: 570: 504: 501:participants 498: 485: 482:participants 479: 469:participants 466: 456:participants 453: 443:participants 440: 436:Ryo Sakazaki 427: 417:participants 414: 404:participants 401: 391:participants 388: 378:participants 375: 365:participants 362: 269: 247: 207: 137: 105:AfC articles 91:project page 84: 40:WikiProjects 3109:MateoEditor 3056:Super Mario 3003:MateoEditor 2950:MateoEditor 2902:MateoEditor 2863:Super Mario 2855:Super Mario 2820:Super Mario 2798:MateoEditor 2690:Super Mario 2668:MateoEditor 2637:MateoEditor 2615:Super Mario 2553:MateoEditor 2481:Super Mario 2473:the article 2465:Super Mario 2451:MateoEditor 2437:MateoEditor 2430:Super Mario 2385:Super Mario 2354:MateoEditor 2299:MateoEditor 2243:MateoEditor 2218:MateoEditor 2179:Super Mario 2166:Super Mario 2150:Super Mario 1983:Super Mario 1760:TheJoebro64 1758:written by 1183:FerDeLancer 1101:screenshots 818:Async Corp. 642:Donkey Kong 520:Screen Rant 430:participant 298:Summary of 287:open tasks: 283:Summary of 223:Video games 214:video games 164:Video games 3311:Categories 3019:Serouj2000 2783:no mistake 2350:OpenCritic 2283:OpenCritic 2233:OpenCritic 1474:See also: 1470:commentary 1219:Dotfarside 1063:assessment 908:River Raid 595:The Sims 4 544:discussion 534:discussion 524:discussion 494:Vector TDx 371:Butterfree 302:open tasks 126:this draft 3260:GuyUser81 3229:GuyUser81 3199:GuyUser81 3185:GuyUser81 3153:GuyUser81 2944:You too @ 2941:mistake". 2535:important 2277:WP:VG/REC 2257:WP:VG/REC 2158:(2006)" 1756:§ Release 1576:WP:TRIVIA 1554:WP:TRIVIA 1095:cover art 1089:infoboxes 766:Ether One 704:Justin Yu 607:Smash Hit 2426:WP:SYNTH 2393:WP:SYNTH 2098:there. – 1559:Negative 1258:required 1119:creation 506:relisted 487:relisted 358:Dokibird 169:Nintendo 141:contribs 2872:ภץאคгöร 2816:"It is 2777:/after 2711:ภץאคгöร 2686:"It is 2682:correct 1377:Nolshru 1329:Nolshru 1291:Nolshru 1254:WP:LEAD 1124:merging 1103:(8,818) 1083:cleanup 936:Pikachu 397:Neo Geo 332:vg talk 322:history 250:on the 30:C-class 3284:msg me 3249:msg me 3219:msg me 3175:msg me 3133:msg me 3123:WP:BRD 3052:Wonder 3042:msg me 2975:Scorch 2840:after 2830:(2006) 2826:since 2754:games. 2738:games. 2700:(2006) 2696:since 2489:Wonder 2475:as if 2424:under 2381:Wonder 2377:latter 2346:WP:FAs 2342:WP:GAs 2332:msg me 2322:WP:FAs 2318:WP:GAs 2275:Well, 2267:msg me 2033:msg me 2025:Sure. 1971:Wonder 1940:msg me 1895:msg me 1865:msg me 1815:games. 1800:msg me 1718:msg me 1677:msg me 1587:msg me 1526:msg me 1502:Wonder 1441:msg me 1350:msg me 1316:msg me 1268:msg me 1107:photos 1038:Tetris 384:Bidoof 337:alerts 36:scale. 3097:WP:OR 3070:edits 2752:Mario 2736:Mario 2589:edits 2568:that. 2541:that. 2503:edits 2407:edits 2279:says 2203:WP:OR 2110:edits 2063:edits 2012:edits 1918:edits 1843:edits 1778:edits 1697:edits 1655:edits 1614:edits 1476:Talk: 1368:: --> 1361:: --> 1115:(190) 1097:(249) 956:start 942:start 928:start 914:start 890:start 876:start 862:start 848:start 824:start 810:start 796:start 772:start 758:start 734:start 720:start 684:Birdo 676:start 662:start 648:start 342:purge 327:shell 312:watch 3264:talk 3233:talk 3203:talk 3189:talk 3157:talk 3113:talk 3066:talk 3023:talk 3007:talk 2998:way. 2984:ctrb 2980:talk 2954:talk 2932:talk 2906:talk 2822:game 2802:talk 2692:game 2672:talk 2641:talk 2585:talk 2557:talk 2499:talk 2455:talk 2441:talk 2403:talk 2358:talk 2344:and 2320:and 2303:talk 2255:See 2247:talk 2222:talk 2214:good 2199:here 2129:talk 2106:talk 2059:talk 2048:Done 2008:talk 1985:and 1967:Sega 1914:talk 1879:talk 1839:talk 1774:talk 1732:talk 1693:talk 1651:talk 1633:talk 1610:talk 1541:talk 1498:Sega 1455:talk 1424:talk 1404:talk 1381:talk 1333:talk 1295:talk 1243:talk 1223:talk 1187:talk 1109:(66) 1091:(21) 352:AfDs 317:edit 307:view 135:talk 2898:you 2851:not 2767:did 2395:. – 2174:." 1600:and 1566:MP1 1449:Ok 1085:(8) 1079:(0) 1069:) ( 1044:rev 1031:rev 1019:nom 1007:nom 995:nom 902:nom 836:nom 784:nom 746:nom 708:nom 698:nom 688:nom 624:nom 612:nom 600:nom 588:nom 576:nom 242:Mid 3313:: 3266:) 3235:) 3205:) 3191:) 3159:) 3115:) 3068:| 3025:) 3009:) 2986:) 2982:| 2956:) 2934:) 2908:) 2869:. 2832:." 2804:) 2781:, 2702:." 2684:: 2674:) 2643:) 2623:." 2587:| 2559:) 2551:" 2501:| 2477:it 2457:) 2443:) 2405:| 2360:) 2305:) 2249:) 2224:) 2131:) 2108:| 2061:| 2010:| 1916:| 1881:) 1841:| 1776:| 1734:) 1695:| 1653:| 1635:) 1612:| 1543:) 1480:§ 1457:) 1426:) 1406:) 1383:) 1335:) 1308:. 1297:) 1245:) 1225:) 1204:🍟 1201:🐟 1189:) 503:; 484:; 167:: 143:). 3262:( 3231:( 3201:( 3187:( 3155:( 3111:( 3072:) 3064:( 3021:( 3005:( 2978:( 2952:( 2930:( 2904:( 2800:( 2785:. 2670:( 2639:( 2610:" 2591:) 2583:( 2555:( 2530:" 2523:" 2505:) 2497:( 2453:( 2439:( 2409:) 2401:( 2356:( 2301:( 2245:( 2220:( 2127:( 2112:) 2104:( 2065:) 2057:( 2014:) 2006:( 2000:– 1995:. 1955:. 1920:) 1912:( 1877:( 1845:) 1837:( 1780:) 1772:( 1730:( 1699:) 1691:( 1657:) 1649:( 1631:( 1616:) 1608:( 1549:@ 1539:( 1453:( 1422:( 1402:( 1379:( 1331:( 1293:( 1241:( 1221:( 1185:( 1073:) 1071:3 1067:2 1065:( 1046:) 1042:( 1033:) 1029:( 1021:) 1017:( 1009:) 1005:( 997:) 993:( 960:) 952:( 946:) 938:( 932:) 924:( 918:) 910:( 904:) 900:( 894:) 886:( 880:) 872:( 866:) 858:( 852:) 844:( 838:) 834:( 828:) 820:( 814:) 806:( 800:) 792:( 786:) 782:( 776:) 768:( 762:) 754:( 748:) 744:( 738:) 730:( 724:) 716:( 710:) 706:( 700:) 696:( 690:) 686:( 680:) 672:( 666:) 658:( 652:) 644:( 626:) 622:( 614:) 610:( 602:) 598:( 590:) 586:( 578:) 574:( 546:) 542:( 536:) 532:( 526:) 522:( 509:) 499:4 496:( 490:) 480:6 477:( 471:) 467:3 464:( 458:) 454:3 451:( 445:) 441:3 438:( 432:) 428:1 425:( 419:) 415:5 412:( 406:) 402:2 399:( 393:) 389:5 386:( 380:) 376:4 373:( 367:) 363:0 360:( 274:. 254:. 138:· 133:( 42::

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index