Talk:PK (film) - Knowledge

1952:(by calling his additions as fancruft). He took the time to add those records again after u deleted. Let me tell you that 'You & your attempts of deletions are meaningless." Who are you to decide "Second week" and "third week" records are less important than first week records. There are 100s of articles written on 2nd & 3rd week records in India. Google this.. PK second week. Box Office India & others daily update BO & write articles on whether its beating 2nd & 3rd week records. They are MUCH MUCH MORE IMPORTANT than 1st week records for Indian films. Only the 2nd week & 3rd week collections describe whether the film is good/bad liked/disliked. All big films break 1st week records movie after movie just based on star power irrespective of the film being good or bad. Only a quality film makes good 2nd & 3rd week collections. It took 6 years to break 3rd week records of 3 idiots. That shows the quality of 3 idiots. Every new movie has record 1st week collections. Only 2nd & 3rd week records describe whether people liked the film or not. They may not be important to u. But they are important to Indians. Let me break it to u, people who visit this page are 99.9% Indians. People who have interest in knowing 1st week records are also interested in 2nd & 3rd week records. People who have no interest in 2nd & 3rd week have no interest in 1st week or any other record for that matter. They show the film's worth. Note: The same records are on 2144:. Stop wagging your angry little finger at everybody. And deleting content is not "illegal". I was actually inclined to seriously consider your point with regard to Avatar--not that "List of records broken" article (because that is an apples-to-oranges comparison), rather the box office content that appears in the main article, but you make it extraordinarily difficult to do so when you keep yelling at people. If it is your uncontrollable nature to yell and accuse people of corruption, then it the uncontrollable nature of other editors to ignore you and dismiss your complaints. If you expect other editors to be open-minded and consider your perspective, then don't yell at them. This is stuff we learn in Kindergarten. Don't they have after-school specials in India? Your argument "delete those first before you come here to delete" is not realistic. This is an unfolding article, where Avatar has been established for a number of years. As I said in my first response, "If nothing noteworthy happened in the second and third weeks, I don't see the value of listing the collections." If, however, something noteworthy happened in the second and third weeks, then it's probably reasonable to consider including it. There are always a few things on my mind when dealing with Bollywood articles: 1) We are not here to promote the film or make it look attractive. 2) Since you like to talk about corruption, as you 1397:

collections it gained to further stamp that everyone is praising it. Are you telling me that 1 person on the wrong side is equal to the 10,000 people on the right side. There is no balance at all. The statements given by the governments, chief-ministers, hindu religious gurus, & whole lot others proves that this controversy is rubbish. If one does a simple search on twitter, facebook, youtube, one can see that everybody loves the film. Moreover nobody(including me) is trying to promote the film by adding support section. If that was the case, many would have tried to add "support" section long ago when the controversy erupted. The film had already done all the box-office business it could do. It has already attained no.1 status. There is nothing more it can do. I am just trying to put the facts on this page. Just like the film tried to help people of india at large, i am doing my part in showing the truth to the people whoever visits this Wiki page. I am tired of protecting this page from vested interests. Hoping that, wiki moderators will step in to do their part.

2357:

value of listing the collections" was predicated on the incorrect assumption that Jack was proposing the inclusion of non-noteworthy second and third week gross figures. In hindsight, if these values were record breaking, as Jack was arguing, then it would be reasonable for us to discuss their inclusion, particularly if similar content was found to be noteworthy in an article like Avatar (2009 film). However we know a few facts: Bollywood box office figures are historically not trustworthy. There has long been an agenda to promote each new film's records, 100 crore club, box office wins, etc. PK is the first film to use Rentrak, a system that is intended to accurately measure PK's audience. So if this is the first film to use an accurate measurement system, how then can we laypeople reasonably compare these measurements against decades of inaccurate measurements? And there are other factors to consider as well when we start drooling over box office records: Although Avatar broke a lot of records, in the long term, these records mean very little. For example,

1325:

worthless people(vested interests). Everyone including media channels know that. Yet, the user is trying to highlight the opinions of those petty people. So, the user cares about those people low-life vested interests, and ignores very important people of the nation like public, Government, various politicians, Big Film personalities & even some religious gurus. The article clearly includes the views of vested interests "All India Human Rights and Social Justice Front to ban its release saying it promoted nudity and vulgarity" and also "Activists of the The Vishwa Hindu Parishad and Bajrang Dal protested against certain scenes in the film, which they considered to be hurtful to the religious sentiments of the Hindu community. Subsequently, a Public Interest Litigation was filed against the film for the same." Only to counter this, the government, Chief ministers, film & famous personalities came out in support for the film. They even made the film-tax free. But

1407:

is also mass-murder & many human crimes(like rape,slavery...) in villages based on caste and religion which do not appear in media. People don't realize how big a problem it is. Since the film did a great job in trying to help indians, i felt it is my duty to protect the film in whatever way i can. Its high time for more films to come out on social-issues. If PK is not protected, then nobody will ever try to make a good-film fearing backlash. If we don't protect the right thing, wrong will rule and nobody can stop the crimes on humans. There are directly visible genocides in the middle-east based on the religious matters. One should never promote bad stuff on the same level of the right stuff. It becomes the root cause of all crimes.

2078:, Nobody cares about weekend records right? It shows 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th weekends records & all other crappy records includung (January weekend, Fastest to reach $ 600 million, Main contributor to the biggest aggregated weekend of all time, Largest gross on New Year day, Highest-grossing CGI star movie, Highest-grossing paraplegic film, Highest-grossing environmentalist movie,Reached $ 1 billion sales outside US and Canada in 28 day, First movie in history to reach $ 2 billion worldwide,.. & many many many more". That page has so many records mentioned that it puts you two into shame for trying to delete records on this page. 1431:. Not sure how to make that clearer. And though I understand your passionate argument, Knowledge isn't the place to "protect" films, and providing a balance of viewpoints isn't going to damage the movie. Knowledge is an encyclopedia, and content should be presented in an encyclopedic fashion. If the film was intended to be a commentary against fraud in religion and superstition, or if there are recurring themes related to that subject, that certainly has a place in the article, if it can be properly sourced to scholars, fellow filmmakers, and so on (i.e. no personal interpretation, soapboxing, or 1716:, is it worth mentioning? Why? Because it adds cachet to the film? That's promotion. The Swami's input might be a more balanced response to the Pro-Hindu protests, but I don't see the value of including a half-dozen quotations from various government leaders, and then from filmmakers and actors on top of that. It's puffery. And it's in a section on Critical response, that is intended for balanced analysis of film critic response. So, do we cut the pro-Hindu protest content and then the politician/filmmaker/actor content in favor of balanced reviews? I don't have a problem with that. Side note: 1465:"Pro-Hindu groups A & B protested the film, arguing that it depicts Hindus negatively. Group B stated, '(quote goes here)'. However some government officials including C, D, E and F praised the film for raising social awareness of issues related to fraud in religion, and harmful superstitious practices like (example goes here), which have caused numerous instances of social unrest in India between 2012 and 2014, including (examples goes here). Official F said, '(quote goes here)', a sentiment echoed by Official E, who remarked '(quote goes here)'." These officials have granted 3653: 3428: 2669: 1360:(your example) I think it is overly promotional. We have a large sub-section Support without any attempt to provided balanced content in the same general area. If this content is to exist, it seems intuitive to balance it with the negative, e.g. "The film received criticism from XYZ groups for being disrespectful to the Hindu faith, etc, etc, yet some lawmakers praised the film for exposing rampant problems with fraud in religion, and gave the film tax exempt status to encourage greater viewership, blah blah blah." Group A says this, Group B says this. Neutral. 376: 1330:

the film. But i haven't added those. I have added only the views of most important people(Chief ministers,..). If I was wiki moderator, i wouldn't even add controversies since they are just created by vested interests which everyone know. Chief ministers, some spiritual gurus, film personalities themselves said that these controversies are rubbish. They are vested interests. Since the film exposes the fraud people, they are trying to attack the film". Check the sources.

243: 173: 149: 725:

very critical of the gods for not helping him and starts seriously questioning their genuineness. But eventually (in a climatic confrontation with the crooked god-man on live TV) he tearfully and elegantly confesses his belief or faith that the creator of all the universe as the real almighty and that it is only human agents who have created false gods, religions and divisions among people.

3609: 3528: 3385: 2707: 2625: 2436: 986: 622: 531: 298: 1533:'s comment is removed from the article? His remarks about the film definitely belongs here. I have added it back so please do not remove it again. Also, please, tell the reason for excluding personality like SRK's support while his rivalry with Aamir Khan is widely known. This is not about always balancing but weights should be given in proportion to their prominence (pls also read: 271: 183: 32: 118: 308: 89: 2243:. If you dont want to collaborate, start your own fanpage website off Knowledge and you can primp and fluff all of the movies you want to. In addition, if what you are doing here is "I am directly accusing" you are also in the wrong place. This page is to discuss article content - accusations must be supported by actual evidence and made in the appropriate forum 2895:. Genre is subjective. Just because *you* consider it a fantasy doesn't mean that it satisfies the criteria of being a fantasy in film. However, since RottenTomatoes is generally considered a reliable source, and you've found a sub page at RT that supports Fantasy, I'm happy to yield on the matter with the following important note: if you had provided 3787: 2361:. Gone With the Wind grossed more in real dollars than Avatar did. Ticket prices have gone up, population has increased, currencies inflate and deflate, etc. I think a smarter approach is to wait for history to decide how record-breaking these films are instead of relying on potentially corrupt sources that update their data from week to week-- 2753: 2484: 577: 3573: 669: 2776: 1034: 790:, I'm curious why we are only using Box Office India totals, which so far seem to be limited to domestic gross. Though I understand there are significant problems with overzealous Bollywood box office figures that we have to watch out for, 1) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film, which prefers worldwide gross in 930:

much more for HNY. Till everything becomes computerized, srk will continue playing this puppet game. I feel pity for those who buy those BO figures. Because they will go to cinemas thinking 'Oh, its earning a lot. It may be good movie. Lets go.' That's exactly what happened for 'Happy new year' film. They were all betrayed.

2023:

is not a valid argument. The fact that a problem exists elsewhere doesn't legitimize the inclusion of excessive statistics in this article. I bet there are lots of articles that use absurd "Blockbuster Status" language, but that doesn't mean it has any academic value. And I made a similar argument to

1971:

If nothing noteworthy happened in the second and third weeks, I don't see the value of listing the collections. What will be of historic note is presumably the first week's take, and the worldwide gross. There's no clear reason to list every week's performance simply because it gets reported. If this

1555:

Did you read the above discussion? I think it's pretty clear why additional comments were removed--there are too many of them. We are not here to catalog every kind word ever said about the movie and I proposed a fairly reasonable framework for the content that should be included so that the pros and

1493:

LOL! Political conspiracy is something I never thought I would be accused of, but well, I guess that's something off my bucket-list! Anyway, thanks Cyphoidbomb, and yes, your version definitely makes more sense. I am not going to revert the user's additions anymore, so I would request some other kind

1406:

Since you are not from India, you have no idea of how many indians are being cheated by the frauds. Almost every indian is cheated by these blind-faiths and numerous crimes take place due to it. Almost all GENOCIDES start on religious matters. Films like "1947 Earth" and "Bombay" show that. But there

1329:

keeps deleting the SUPPORT addition which proves that he's against the film. My point is.. since views of unimportant people are added in the article, then the views of most important people who are supporting it must be added too. There are many hindu BJP groups, some organistions who are supporting

2990:

Review aggregation website Rotten Tomatoes surveyed 114 critics and, categorizing the reviews as positive or negative, assessed 55 as positive and 59 as negative. Of the 114 reviews, it determined a rating average of 5.4 out of 10. As of December 27, 2014 the website had assigned the film a score of

1461:

section, editors have presented a balance of opinion including praise, middle-of-the-road reviews, and negative reception. I don't think there is anything wrong with listing a few government officials who are in praise of the film, but I think we should pick shorter quotations overall, and use fewer

713:

That claim is based on just one source article which had mooted that the movie character PK was inspired by the renowned rationalist and atheist Abraham Kovoor. There is no claim or evidence shown in that source article that the writer behind the movie story or the movie maker Rajkumar Hirani having

2987:

and it is far too tempting for editors to find five positive reviews of a movie they liked and say, "Look, five positive responses means the response was unanimous—critics loved it!" In film and television articles we tend to rely on critical response aggregators like Metacritic and Rotten Tomatoes

2333:

While i think it might be appropriate to note in text that these rolling records, I dont see them as actual worthy "records" . "He holds the record for putting the most white marbles in his mouth." " He holds the record for holding the most black marbles in his mouth" Particularly when the counting

1910:

I don't understand the point of your admonishment. Rahat asked if the source was reliable. TRPOD said that it was not. I agreed. Wiki rules and traditions pretty much resolved the entire matter and none of us used this fake article as a reference. Now on a tangent, JackThomas said that the article

863:

gives accurate figures as far as my encounter tallying the numbers on both sides is concerned. As per current trends, the film is still in the market and its collections are varying. Box Office India will give you the most precise worldwide gross but one needs to hold on. At this moment it will be

2835:

Cyphoidbomb (talk | contribs)‎ . . (50,610 bytes) (+123)‎ . . (Don't need wikilinks for common concepts. Don't need to capitalize Comedy. Got a source for "fantasy" as a genre? From what I know of the film it is intended to be satirical, and it is directly observable as a comedy, though I've added

2516:

over "Possible sequel", I don't particularly see the need to devote a section to something that hasn't been confirmed. Surely given the opportunity to talk about a possible sequel, any actor across the globe would do so, and would speak favorably of it, because actors like to work. If the standard

2221:

if the wrong person is in front of me & making such silly arguments. I know ur response will be "I am telling admin to block user Jack". I don't give a shit. I've been blocked before. I will never stop punching wrong people. Being blocked/unblocked makes no difference in my mind, because I am

929:

The reason why computerizing every theatre should be done is, because we all know every big movie except Aamir movie have inflated BO figures. Especially Srk movies. Now srk will manipulate the figures like never before to break this film's record. He manipulated 40 crore for Chennai Express &

502:

reply to that edit ban message. Please help! I wrote it fully myself. They should have checked it first. My whole 1 hour hard work for Knowledge in waste. I could have done a better work rather but I chose to contribute to wikipedia for 1 long hour and now they say it was copyrighted? Please help!

2734:

In the plot of PK, jaggu started working as a reporter after she came to india. That wasn't specified in the plot.People who read this will be clueless as to why tapashree talked about jaggu during the interview (It was because she was a reported who was hosting the interview).And also PK absorbs

724:

The PK character in the movie on the other hand, after learning about the gods, the beliefs and the ways of religions in earth starts appealing to each gods for recovering his "remote control" because he took the words of some that only gods can help him. Along the way he gets frustrated, becomes

501:

I wrote the whole plot summary for PK taking out time, revising. This whole took me an hour and then they say it is copyrighted and I maybe banned from editing. My 1 hour hard work is a waste? And they claim it to be someone else' work. Please add it, I have written it myself. I don't know how to

2356:

The crux of my comment was that I'd initially misinterpreted what Jackthomas321 was proposing, and by the time I understood what his point was, we had a new focus, his irrational rage, to attend to. My first response, "If nothing noteworthy happened in the second and third weeks, I don't see the

1478:

users, etc., but it is not their job to monitor every edit that gets made to an article. That's why we have regular editors and discussion pages. So far there is no reason for administrators to be involved in this article unless they happen to be interested in the subject and wish to contribute.

2947:

I would tend to agree. Some films are obviously comedies and don't require any real interpretation (or sourcing) to draw that conclusion. But to one person "fantasy" means unicorns and wizards, and to another person it means aliens, so in these more interpretive areas we should rely on sources.

2170:

I am not here for a conversation with any wiki editor. What i am doing on this Talk Page is, "I am directly accusing the person who is deleting the records, because he has done the wrong thing (twice)." What PK achieved in a country is what Avatar achieved in the world because english is global

1374:

I've made a few changes to the section in question, but there is still more to be done. We have two sentences on the people complaining about the film, then the rest of the paragraph is chock full of all the people who love it. There are presently about five different, lengthy quotes from these

1355:

argument. That is, "if we're not going to present a balanced perspective, why include quotes from one side of the fence?" Our job is to present a neutral perspective on any subject, not only one perspective. If you disagree with the representation of balance in the article, that's fine, you can

1324:

keeps on deleting it stating that "when we don't have quotes from the fundamentalists why have quotes from the supporters." The "Support" addition is must, since The WIKI article clearly mentions various views & as well as the cases filed against the film. The people who filed the cases are

2005:

for over a year now. And the table over there is twice as large. Nobody is a fool here. Dhoom 3 Records are edited by everyone very often (almost twice a week). And Yet nobody has deleted the records for over a year. But people are hell bent on trying to delete records of this film every day.

1396:

Why should there be a balance, when there is no balance on the issue? Few groups are trying to attack because their frauds are exposed in the film. Whereas the rest of the nation is supporting the film. The ratio is like 1:10,000. Apart from the sources i gave, one has to just see the record

3701:

Bahubali 2 - The Conclusion which has smashed all box office records has also taken the Worldwide crown in just six days. The film has gone past the Worldwide record of PK at 743 crore with business close to 800 crore. Dangal was 718 crore Worldwide. PK at 743 crore and Dangal at 702 crore.

3687:

Bahubali 2 - The Conclusion has hit 1000 crore GROSS Worldwide box office in ten days. The film had gone past the Worldwide record of PK at 743 crore a few days back. Dangal was 718 crore Worldwide but now with its China run it can go over 900 crore but its not catching Bahubali - The

1560:'s" comment to be reinstated, which politician's comment would you like to remove instead? And if you think Shah Rukh's comment is worth including, what actor/filmmaker's comment would you propose to remove to make room for it? Additionally when your edit is reverted, you must get 2983:" argument. Lots of articles have misspellings—does that mean we shouldn't fix misspelling? Some articles have excessively long plot summaries—shouldn't we cut those down? Summaries of critical response are not warmly received by WikiProject Film, because they tend to constitute 1634:. Why exactly do the opinions of government officials hold any more weight than those of Hindu extremist groups? What makes them any more noteworthy? Because they were elected to office? And you seem to be ignoring the fact that we are not here to promote the film or to contravene 2177:

page same way 1 year ago, but they allowed all records over there. Dhoom3 page is still being checked by main editors once a week. For 1 whole year, all MAIN EDITORS had no problem with records of that page. But they have problem in showing the same records of PK. Mind u,

1351:. There are any number of reasons why someone might reasonably remove content without them being part of a conspiracy. Based on the first quote you provided, "when we don't have quotes from the fundamentalists why have quotes from the supporters", that sounds like a basic 720:

Abraham Kovoor was not only a rationalist but also an atheist throughout his adult life openly known to public. Even after his death his body was donated to the Colombo Medical College as per his wishes and there were no religious funeral ceremonies held by the family.

1911:

was fake, and he was right, but the logic he was using to explain why it was fake, was illogical. If he'd provided the links that you did, that would have clarified his argument, but it doesn't really matter, since we'd already determined the source to be sketchy.

1651:, which requires you to achieve consensus after your bold change has been reverted, and you're probably aware that DRN isn't the first step to resolving a difference of opinion, particularly not after a scant two volleys in a discussion. I will also point out that 1219:

Why the sources are not reliable ? I am not asking to use the exact heading or words . But it's related to the article and something can be added to the article . So many references can't be ignored . If I want I can put more references from news websites.

2540:. If it hasn't been confirmed, we can simply say so with sources. It does not necessarily deserve an exclusion. With sources like NDTV, The Times of India, The Hindu, Hindustan Times, the section should not face such problem. Besides, an user's placing it in the 3270:

at 117.196.167.238 swaps out a reference from International Business Times dated 28 February 2015 with a sloppy Q&A "article" at Box Office India from 18 February. Another IP (who I assume is the same person based on their needlessly hostile edit summary

728:

The only commonality with Kovoor's life I see is that both had battled in their own ways to expose false god-men. But surely PK does not subscribe to atheism at all and so its an invalid judgement that the character was inspired from Kovoor. (K. Sethu)

1813:

logical fallacy. The fact that something did not happen, i.e. the appearance of the interview in many other publications, doesn't prove that the interview didn't happen. Although TRPoD's general note that the source is unreliable carries more weight.

1439:. Once we start getting into accolades and criticism, all of which represents opinions, we need to provide sufficient balance, and listing excessive, long quotes, isn't particularly helpful to achieving balance. For instance, the American film 1711:

Fun reply, but while office holders are "notable", as your NPOL link establishes, their opinions on films aren't necessarily "noteWORTHY" or relevant. They are no more experts on films than anybody else with an opinion. If David Cameron likes

1087:

There are massive protests, burning of posters occurred against this film. The controversy is in hike making headlines across national newspapers still there is no separate section or detailed information about this issue on the article? Why?

3029:

I am aware that Alien belongs to Science Fiction but I can't write according to my wish . Unfortunately IMDB mentions the genre as Fantasy . You think :: for me alien is fantasy and for others witches , wizards and dragons are fantasy

3119:

plays an Alien who comes in a Space-Ship and searches for his Lost switch , without which he can't go back to his planet . The Alien can read people's minds and even watch the memory as a Visual. you can read the movie plot if you want.

1802:

If Aamir Khan gave interview, then trust me, it would appear atleast in thousand websites(all over the media)(especially after the controversy). After searching google, i noticed that it is only there in that website. So, its fake.

1586:? Its about the significance and not about numbers. I think I have already stated that clearly. While prominent figures like LK Advani's remark is noteworthy hence, if you continue to revert then I think we should seek the DRN. 2273:

A User added completely valid stuff on the article, u named it 'fancruft' & deleted it. When he added again, u named it 'fancruft' & deleted again. Then when i am brought up the issue here on this talk page, you &

2576:

I still don't think it warrants inclusion; it's vapor. The film has an ambiguous ending (from what I can tell), and actors are speculating. I think it only warrants inclusion if and when there is a concrete announcement.

2125:

exists everywhere. You people are paid to do such illegal acts. Never ever give me that 'Knowledge is encyclopedia or notes on historic importance' crap. Its just like every other website with corrupted regular editors.

744:

Hi, the fact that you disagree with a statement made by the source doesn't mean that your opinion trumps the source. If you'd like to call into question the reliability of the source, that's fine, and you can do that at

3123:

actual Genre of this movie would be Sci-Fi Comedy . And there is no political thing in this movie , It's about Religion and Fake God-men , Religious practices. I hope Religion and Politics are two different things

2148:

know, there is rampant corruption with box office figures. This is a messy obstacle if we're going to compare PK to films that are mired in this box office corruption. Somehow we will have to work around this problem.

3287:. The poorly-explained swap-out of these sources looks an awful lot like POV editing to me. For these reasons, I am restoring the content until such time as a local consensus can be established by less hostile users. 1013:

Section 6) Criticism I don't think it should be called that (Criticism), either break it into 2 sections one critical reception and the second criticism for each of the 2 paragraphs Or rename section to Reception

1356:

calmly and rationally bring it up on the talk page, but posting a SHOUTING SUBJECT HEADER accusing other editors of being paid to promote extremist ideologies, is not constructive. Looking at the contribution in

946:

Again when there are multiple reliable sources reporting different aspects, we report that the reliable sources are giving different views, we dont pick the one that we most agree with and ignore the others. --

558:

In the plot summary, please change "After hearing this, Sarfaraz gives PK his device back." to "After hearing this, Tapasvi gives PK his device back." because Tapasvi is the one who challenges PK, not Sarfaraz.

415:

been provided ample reliable sources like Hindustan Times,India Today,TOI etc.Even Rajkumar Hirani has also said he is making this film and shooting will begin mid-2013.There is no uniformity and consistency on

2891:, we don't consider IMDb, or Wikia, or BollywoodMDB or discussion forums or rumor mills or any other user-contributed site (including Knowledge itself) as a suitable reference, because these are not considered 2196:

is the only popular actor in India who has been pushing the industry for accuracy on BO figures. His films are as clean & pure as color white. I don't care about other actors or their films. Regarding your

3114:

most Indian directors don't reveal about movie plot before the release of the movie due to obvious reasons .The links are before the release of the movie . After the release of the movie people found that

1642:

negative attention the film has received? And if not, how many examples of praise do we need? Further, if you're so familiar with Knowledge editing that with 87 edits under your belt you can toss around

2209:, may be u learned to be a polite coward when something wrong is happening. I react like a Man to wrong people. When something is wrong, a Real Man gets angry whereas a coward behaves polite. Regarding 2517:

for "possible sequel" is simple chatter, I think our standards are too low, because everything hypothetical scenario could be incorporated as a "possible this-or-that". Knowledge is not a rumor mill.

1106:

Probably because people such as yourself aren't adding one. Knowledge is run by volunteers who are regular people like you. If you think the section is worth adding, add it. Please be sure to provide

2993:

These aggregators are not always in agreement, however, which tends to suggest that our personal evaluations of critical response would be equally as subjective and problematic. (Prior discussions:

60: 1659:

for the addition of your preferred content, without proposing the removal of other content. I don't particularly care if Advani's comment goes in, but again, who's comment should be removed?

3497:

is not exactly correct. Tapasvi decides to come on air, the "public appeals" are only in the form of hate mail received by Tapasvi. The general public does not appeal Tapasvi to come on-air.

1273: 3890: 1150: 2236:

If you are not here to work with other editors, you are in the wrong place- we are here to collaborate with other editors to create an encyclopedia (see the note at the top of every page

795: 3284: 3581: 1655:

seemed to agree with my proposal above for a more compact section, and the other editor has been indefinitely blocked for behavior unbecoming a Knowledge editor. So again, you have no

3806: 2288:

In her response, she talked about the way i talked several months ago for which i have already been blocked before. Now, instead of adding those records, you guys are talking about

3275:) again replaces the more recent International Business Times article with an outdated Q&A "article". I don't particularly care what the gross total is except for what can be 3063:, IMDb is not considered a reliable source, because it is user-contributed, just like Wikia, Knowledge, BollywoodMDB, etc. So for our purposes here, it is entirely irrelevant. 1690: 1828:

He is right , I read an article that Aamir is irked about his fake interview in a Pakistani website . These pakistani websites does these things to improve their popularity .

1878:. Simply following Wiki rules and traditions is not enough , please search the internet to learn the truth . It took me only few seconds to google search and get the links. 1474:

And so forth. Also, for the record, there are no "moderators" per se. We have administrators who tend to matters like blocking vandals, protecting articles from IP users and

385: 281: 252: 159: 1630:

There are two sentences about pro Hindu extremist groups, then a giant paragraph of effusive praise for the film from people who aren't even film critics, yet you're citing

2171:

language. success ratio of both films is same. Forget Avatar. My point is, some of Wikis main editors are corrupted/biased/have hidden agendas. Thats my accusation. PROOF:

3880: 1253:

I see about 20 people, some of whom are smiling. We already have a mention of two groups who were involved in pro-Hindu protests in the Critical reception section. Per

749:, but there appear to be a number of sources that make similar claims, although I haven't looked too closely into the facts to figure out who originated the statement. 3501:

I hope no one has any objection with this. If you do, add your comments below. Currently the plot is 650 words, close to the Knowledge requirement of 400-700 words.

3145:, you accept Rotten Tomatoes as reliable . And also trust newspaper source , in these articles you will find that PK is mentioned as Science Fiction . take a look 99: 54: 48: 2813:

both mention the genre as fantasy , comedy and drama . if some editors are more experienced , then they don't have special power to edit according to their will.

3885: 390: 72: 1160: 734: 3845: 66: 2280:

This is the meaning of 'not co-operating'. Bottomline is.. wiki editors do not allow certain things to be added if it doesn't meet their agendas. Just noticed

2173:

Forget Avatar. I'll prove it based on Indian films. Like so many MAIN/HEAD EDITORS like you& others are checking this page on a daily basis, they checked

473: 3895: 1848: 1274:

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/hindi/bollywood/news/Protest-against-PK-escalates-theatres-in-Gujarat-vandalised/articleshow/45685893.cms

1017:

Its called Criticism but reviews in the first paragraph are giving mostly positive feedback, only the second paragraph is actually Criticism of the film.

3860: 2998: 2994: 1151:

http://www.hindustantimes.com/entertainment/bollywood/pk-controversies-added-media-coverage-brings-more-audience-feels-subhash-ghai/article1-1303358.aspx

1948:

I will try my best to be as polite as possible. Why are you deleting records again and again. You called it "Meaningless Fancruft". Well, you insulted

1843: 1145: 1853: 2222:

happy & at peace knowing that 'i am on the right side.' I have made my points in my previous comments. I will not reply on this topic anymore.

1155: 3855: 3875: 366: 356: 3556: 2863: 1250: 1188: 1165: 1286: 1140: 482: 453: 649:

There are some mistakes in the article Pk(2014) and it only has a very brief and incomplete description . So please allow me to edit it.

3900: 3412: 3154: 2467: 2394: 859:: Always stick to official sources rather than websites which either manipulate figures or borrow the figures from the official source. 798:, are reporting bigger numbers. Where can I read the consensus discussion that resulted in the decision to stick only with BOI? Thanks, 472:

Local Belgian media reports that the movie has been recorded in the city of Bruges (Belgium) for the first 15 minutes. Source in Dutch:

3436:

If you want to suggest a change, please request this in the form "Please replace XXX with YYY" or "Please add ZZZ between PPP and QQQ".

3865: 3797: 3779: 2292:

This further proves that, "you guys have no intention in doing the right thing" & u resort to meaningless comments & excuses.

2271:

This sentence is the joke of the day. I will tell u the meaning of "not co-operating/dictatorship' which is exactly u guys are doing.

1462:

of them, especially if multiple people are basically saying the same thing. Something along the lines of this makes more sense to me:

3473:"PK says the "God that created us all" is the only one we should believe in, and that the other "duplicate Gods" are created by man." 3017: 1089: 446:

I know that the first revealed poster was controversial, but it's still valid promotional material, so I think it should be added.

1291: 915:

only for this film. Hoping for Rentrak to speed up its operations & computerize almost all theatres to get accurate figures.

893:- when multiple reliable sources report different things, we report that the reliable sources are reporting different things. -- 694: 601: 1312:

I have added "Support" for the film from the nation including "Government, politicians, film & other famous personalities."

869: 3870: 3752:

By "avatars", the linked article seems to mean costumes, PK's multiple sets of stolen clothing. Is this detail worth keeping?

1770: 201: 1161:

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/bareilly/CM-waived-tax-on-PK-to-woo-Muslim-voters-Bajrang-Dal/articleshow/45719679.cms

3850: 3215: 710:

The article includes a statement: // Aamir Khan’s character as PK is inspired from a real life character Abraham Kovoor//

1972:

is so important to Indians, they can read about this information at the relevant news website. Encyclopedias summarize the

1170: 3173:

The only problem I have is that you brought up IMDb as a source again yesterday; I yielded on the Fantasy genre days ago.

2140:

Jack, if you accuse someone of being "paid to do" "illegal acts" again without some tangible evidence, I will take you to

1278: 213: 205: 474:

http://www.hln.be/hln/nl/922/Nieuws/article/detail/2141251/2014/12/04/Kan-Brugge-toeristen-lokken-met-Bollywoodfilm.dhtml

3824: 2043:

Knowledge is not a collection of indiscriminate information. Nobody cares about week by week updates except for fanboiz.

129: 1849:

http://www.hindustantimes.com/tabloid/aamir-khan-sends-notice-to-pak-websites-over-fake-interview/article1-1305984.aspx

2284:

response on Admin's page, that's another joke. Her response further proves my claims. The topic of discussion here is

331: 321: 276: 3466:

I added a few details, such as how PK practices every Indian religion in search of "God" and still does not find him.

1844:

http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report-aamir-khan-sends-legal-notice-to-pakistani-websites-over-fake-interview-2051909

1134:

I don't know why I am not able to edit this page . There is no controversy section for love jihad . It's necessary

3509: 2980: 2020: 1146:

http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report-pk-controversy-aamir-khan-film-sparks-outrage-in-several-indian-cities-2047859

421: 209: 196: 154: 3100:

then what is the problem , [[Rotten Tomatoes does not separate Fantasy and Sci-Fi . They put them in one category

3659:

That doesn't sound like a noteworthy role. Can you please explain why it should be noted? Knowledge is not IMDb.

3161: 3042: 2859: 2599: 2412: 2335: 2248: 2121:& records on several other movie pages. But you are trying to delete here again & again. Its a fact that 2093: 2053: 1980:

aspects of the subject. That's what books are for. And, this is a global encyclopedia, not the Indian Knowledge.

1870: 1854:

http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/aamir-khan-sends-notice-to-pakistan-websites-over-fake-interview/1/412953.html

1789: 1298: 1239: 1225: 1205: 1184: 948: 911:

has officially worked for this film. PK's official figures by Rentrak is closer to Koimoi figures. Hence i trust

894: 839: 95: 1234:

If other movies can have sub section , not having any controversy section is not right , considering the truth

1156:

http://www.hindustantimes.com/entertainment/bollywood/why-boyycottpk-makes-no-sense-at-all/article1-1299098.aspx

3560: 3283:

or open a discussion at the Indian cinema task force page. Currently though, the community appears to consider

3259:

There appears to be a recent flurry of interest in box office gross totals, from some IP users, for example in

1135: 512: 2464: 486: 457: 3462:

I've attempted to improve the plot of this movie, by shortening unimportant details and adding missing info.

3416: 2471: 1755: 1063:

I'm sorry I had to change the plot summary to do justice to the story. Anyway, your hard work is appreciated.

3615: 3534: 3391: 3198: 2713: 2631: 2591: 2442: 2297: 2227: 2131: 2083: 2046: 2011: 1961: 1883: 1475: 992: 935: 920: 628: 537: 424:

has no sources or references,but no one cares about that. Like that so many films article are on wikipedia.

38: 2188:

comment, u don't need to tell a smarter person than u about it. I mentioned on this page itself yesterday.

1093: 3641: 2930: 2765: 2263: 2202: 2117:

for 5 years now on wikipedia. So many WIKIs regular editors, moderators & administrators have allowed

2108: 2073: 1943: 864:

not satisfactory to put the worldwide gross because several websites report incorrect figures. One of the

2657: 1766: 1287:

http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/magazines/panache/pk-leads-to-twitter-battle/articleshow/45614740.cms

1166:

http://www.theguardian.com/film/2015/jan/02/bollywood-film-pk-hindu-nationalist-protests-india-aamir-khan

1022: 3714: 3664: 3505: 3442:

to back up your request, without which no information should be added to, or changed in, any article. -

3361: 3329: 3292: 3178: 3068: 3013: 2953: 2908: 2582: 2564: 2522: 2496: 2370: 2154: 2033: 1985: 1916: 1866: 1819: 1810: 1729: 1664: 1573: 1484: 1380: 1365: 1262: 1141:

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Saffron-outfits-disrupt-PK-shows-again/articleshow/45697488.cms

1119: 1073: 803: 791: 754: 429: 135: 3238:

even major Hollywood Blockbuster's do not have a separate page for awards.... Merge and speedy delete..

2839:

Still they think the movie is not fantasy . Not my view but a movie about alien can't be fantasy ????

2740: 3279:. If the IPs have a problem with the International Business Times, they can take it up at Knowledge's 2557: 1103: 375: 3637: 3343: 3311: 3157: 3038: 3005: 2970: 2878: 2855: 2851: 2401: 1702: 1609: 1604:

while some pro-BJP gorup supporters are against the film, LK Advani's remarks definitely count here.

1591: 1542: 1375:

people. That is not a proper balance, which only emphasizes that Krimuk90's concern was appropriate.

1294: 1235: 1221: 1180: 1176: 690: 597: 478: 449: 2925:

sources like newspapers call it, for most of them (including Raju Hirani) call it a satirical film.

2653: 1760: 1638:

by presenting an imbalanced perspective. Please note my Citizen Kane example above. Surely there is

1018: 652: 117: 88: 3356:" If the model of the cassette recorder is not an integral part of the film, it should be omitted. 3244: 2984: 2686: 2118: 2114: 2067: 1949: 1721: 1656: 1561: 1201: 730: 656: 560: 508: 3775: 3695: 3681: 2736: 3801: 3194: 2293: 2223: 2127: 2079: 2007: 1957: 1905: 1879: 1858: 1804: 1782: 1509: 1436: 1418: 1408: 1398: 1342: 1331: 1048: 931: 916: 676:: this is not the place to request changes in protection level. You can either file a request a 564: 1292:

http://indianexpress.com/article/entertainment/bollywood/aamir-khans-pk-leads-to-twitter-battle/

3306:

Mentioned details (model) of the cassette recorder because it is an integral part of the film.-

907:

I have no clue of who is better(BOI or Koimoi). But there are no problems for this film, since

717:

I wish to point out that this conclusion in that source article is incorrect and so not valid.

3764: 3589: 3447: 3354:

Mentioned details (model) of the cassette recorder because it is an integral part of the film.

3223: 3127: 3109: 3060: 2926: 2884: 2761: 2362: 1682: 1534: 2411:

Because everyone has an opinion about movies, but we only include subject matter experts. --

3818: 3710: 3660: 3357: 3325: 3288: 3174: 3146: 3140: 3087: 3064: 3033: 3009: 2949: 2904: 2900: 2578: 2518: 2492: 2366: 2281: 2275: 2165: 2150: 2029: 1996: 1981: 1912: 1862: 1815: 1725: 1660: 1569: 1480: 1391: 1376: 1361: 1258: 1115: 1069: 912: 877: 860: 854: 799: 750: 425: 1568:. Your re-addition of this content will be reverted since we are not yet all in agreement. 3339: 3321: 3307: 2595: 2397: 2042: 1698: 1644: 1631: 1605: 1601: 1587: 1538: 1254: 685: 592: 412: 3471:

I also added one of the punchlines of the climatic confrontation between PK and Tapasvi,

1788:

There is nothing to indicate the interview is "fake" but it is not a reliable source. --

1697:

too and why we need to remove a comment to enter another? What is your rationale please?

1171:

http://www.thehindu.com/opinion/op-ed/comment-on-pk-movie-controversy/article6745645.ece

242: 3555:

US$ 100 Million is 677 Crores, not 630 Crores. Please change this as soon as possible.

3239: 2810: 2783: 2680: 2390: 1717: 1694: 1678: 1674: 1635: 1424: 1352: 1279:

http://www.ndtv.com/article/india/theatres-vandalized-as-anti-pk-protests-spread-642048

1111: 890: 817: 769: 765: 677: 3733:

The attack is later declared by Tapasvi's group to be stated as protecting their Gods.

3480:

I also corrected various details that were wrong, such as PK attempting to grab hands

3155:

Part comedy, part drama, PK opts to share its genre specification with science fiction

2066:

First & foremost, you guys need to understand that i don't buy a thing. Knowledge

3839: 3280: 2244: 2141: 2025: 1652: 1648: 1565: 1495: 1423:, There should be a balance, because barring a few exceptions, Knowledge strives for 1348: 1326: 1321: 1044: 746: 681: 588: 2358: 1556:

cons are adequately balanced. So if for some reason you want "the Senior BJP leader

1065:

Please include the original writer of the film's story, not only the screen writers.

3760: 3585: 3443: 3439: 3219: 2896: 2892: 2888: 2676: 1469:

tax-exempt status in order to encourage more of their constituents to see the film.

1458: 1441: 1432: 1107: 865: 313: 1320:

without even adding a separate SUPPORT section which i did in the first edit. But

1249:

If you can help to establish the scale of the protests, that would be helpful. In

3742: 3732: 3324:, how is the model number of the cassette recorder an integral part of the film? 2278:

are giving me the most silliest excuses imaginable for 'why we will not add it.'

2113:

Delete those first before you come here to delete. There is a dedicated page for

2028:

because editors kept adding semi-daily content that is historically meaningless.

200:. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can 3812: 1454: 1428: 1257:

it is not Knowledge's aim to give unnecessary weight or voice to fringe groups.

886: 873: 783: 188: 17: 2092:

Yes, there are lots of crappy fancruft articles that need to be cleaned up. --

3738:

Didn't Tapasvi say that it was Muslims? Or was he speaking of something else?

3584:

Exchange rates change all the time - we use the figures quoted at the time. -

3116: 2903:, this entire questioning scenario would probably have been averted. Regards, 2193: 2122: 303: 178: 172: 148: 3338:

Hey I didn't say that about the model number; I meant the cassette recorder.-

2988:

to make the call, and the preferred way to communicate that information is:

1557: 1530: 1136:

http://www.deccanherald.com/content/449522/pk-supports-love-jihad-hindu.html

417: 37:

This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the

2465:

http://www.koimoi.com/box-office-verdict-bollywoods-top-worldwide-grossers/

2290:

it would be punch on his face if someone makes such silly arguments with me

706:

How is it correct to say the PK character was inspired from Abraham Kovoor?

297: 270: 2735:

jaggu's memory not during the interview but before bhairon singh's death.

1687:

Neutrality assigns weight to viewpoints in proportion to their prominence.

1446: 3495:"After massive public appeals, Tapasvi is forced to come into the studio" 1308:

Support from Government, Chief ministers, film & famous personalities

217: 3786: 2816: 2001:

I don't buy a thing you said. Because the same records are on wikipedia

2174: 908: 3093: 2975:, I forgot to address one of your other objections, where you write: " 2826: 2189: 1347:

I would be very careful throwing around accusations if I were you, as

3807:

Knowledge:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 4 § Peekay(film)

3636:

Ad Nitant Shrivastava in the Cast section he played as a Hindu Saint

2199:

If you accuse someone ... without evidence, I will take you to WP:ANI

2327:

Cyphoidbomb indicated that this issue may merit further discussion.

329:-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the 2359:

this is a list of US box office gross totals adjusted for inflation

2238:"Work submitted to Knowledge can be edited, used, and redistributed 2217:

for u based on my comments on internet, but it actually would be a

1829: 3804:. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at 2592:

Knowledge:Verifiability#Verifiability_does_not_guarantee_inclusion

2544:

section poses a logical fallacy. The marketing section deals with

1447:

largely considered one of the best movies in American film history

326: 3679:

Worldwide Gross of PK from Two sources: 743 crore first source:

3484:

meeting Bhairon. In the movie, PK decides to learn language only

2047:

having a source does not mean that content is appropriate for an

3831: 3768: 3718: 3668: 3645: 3593: 3564: 3513: 3451: 3420: 3365: 3347: 3333: 3315: 3296: 3246: 3227: 3202: 3193:

The genre is becoming too big . It should be Sci-Fi Comedy only

3182: 3165: 3072: 3046: 2957: 2934: 2912: 2867: 2806: 2795: 2769: 2744: 2691: 2661: 2607: 2586: 2571: 2526: 2500: 2475: 2420: 2405: 2374: 2343: 2301: 2256: 2231: 2158: 2135: 2101: 2087: 2061: 2037: 2015: 1989: 1965: 1920: 1887: 1823: 1797: 1775: 1733: 1706: 1668: 1613: 1595: 1577: 1546: 1537:) and I have not included every bollywood personalities support. 1516: 1488: 1411: 1401: 1384: 1369: 1334: 1302: 1266: 1243: 1229: 1213: 1192: 1123: 1097: 1077: 1052: 1026: 956: 939: 924: 902: 881: 868:

I saw says 324 cr other says 401 cr. Which one to believe? Read

847: 821: 807: 772: 758: 738: 699: 660: 606: 568: 516: 490: 461: 433: 3696:

http://www.boxofficeindia.com/report-details.php?articleid=2904

3682:

http://www.boxofficeindia.com/report-details.php?articleid=2914

3603: 3522: 3379: 2701: 2619: 2430: 980: 616: 525: 111: 83: 26: 2598:

weight to speculation and gossip of a promotional nature. --

374: 241: 2389:

Please, state rationale for removing such a reformist like

1724:

is a policy, however, and you should be adhering to that.

3709:

The worldwide gross should be changed from 792 to 743 --

2652:

Rs 642 crore = 104 million please correct it imediately

2532:

Hi Cyphoidbomb, thanks for bringing it to talk. Yes, it

3792: 3272: 3268: 3264: 3260: 2976: 2514: 2512: 2179: 2002: 1953: 1689:". I think the protest section should be expanded too. 1357: 1317: 1313: 1041: 787: 585: 3728:

What is so unfortunate about the name "Jagat Janini"?

3147:

Entertaining blend of social satire, sci-fi and comedy

2463:

Box Office Collection : 635 Crore, 102.3 Millions USD

1693:. Thanks for the BRD but I think you're familiar with 3800:

to determine whether its use and function meets the

1681:tells to focus on numbers for balancing rather the 714:said that the inspiration was from Abraham Kovoor. 1691:Please, comment on content, not on the contributor 2201:comment, Do it right now coz I am still accusing 1758:as reliable? Can we add info from this source? - 3891:C-Class Indian cinema articles of Low-importance 3218:Is it really worth it? I would suggest merging. 2334:of the marbles has always been iffy at best. -- 325:, which aims to improve Knowledge's coverage of 1463: 613:Semi-protected edit request on 24 December 2014 522:Semi-protected edit request on 23 December 2014 216:. To improve this article, please refer to the 3519:Semi-protected edit request on 20 January 2016 3285:International Business Times a reliable source 3098:Drama , Science Fiction & Fantasy , Comedy 2921:I think it is best that the genre remain what 2831:Drama , Science Fiction & Fantasy , Comedy 2698:Semi-protected edit request on 25 January 2015 2616:Semi-protected edit request on 19 January 2015 2427:Semi-protected edit request on 14 January 2015 1781:NO. That interview is fake. It didn't happen. 2679:that support the change you want to be made. 2548:whereas the contested content deals with the 2269:we are here to collaborate with other editors 1349:you should be discussing content, not editors 977:Semi-protected edit request on 1 January 2015 8: 3600:Semi-protected edit request on 27 April 2016 2491:It appears this change was made by Arjunk6. 2070:. It has all kinds of records on that page. 778:Why BOI and domestic box office totals only? 3376:Semi-protected edit request on 25 June 2015 3255:POV editing with regard to box office gross 1976:aspects of a subject, we don't memorialize 2977:lots of movies summarize critical response 2511:With respect to the recent back and forth 476: 265: 212:. To use this banner, please refer to the 143: 1695:Don't revert due solely to "no consensus" 44:times. The weeks in which this happened: 3881:C-Class India articles of Low-importance 2842:He added bollywoodhungama as a source 1720:is an essay, not a guideline or policy. 2184:Coming to your comment. Regarding your 2024:what I posted above in January 2014 at 408:Dont delete,ample RS have been provided 267: 145: 115: 3675:Worldwide Gross of PK : Rs 743 crore 3353: 2365:and we are not here to promote films. 2207:This is stuff we learn in Kindergarten 1494:editor to make the changes. Cheers! -- 3886:Low-importance Indian cinema articles 3211:Separate article for list of awards ? 815:That was why his edit was reverted. - 587:. I haven't seen the film, but will 7: 3846:Pages in the Knowledge Top 25 Report 3059:As I have previously mentioned, per 2594:and certainly a complete section is 1316:and later toned down to a few lines 319:This article is within the scope of 194:This article is within the scope of 61:December 28, 2014 to January 3, 2015 3434:as you have not requested a change. 2760:make more corrections if you want. 1647:, you should also be familiar with 1564:before reinstating it. Please read 1200:We are not going to put it in as a 134:It is of interest to the following 3896:WikiProject Indian cinema articles 1272:Here is the magnitude of protests 834:of the sources that is considered 98:on 18 January 2013. The result of 25: 3861:Indian cinema task force articles 2565: 2363:we are not a breaking news source 684:, the protecting administrator. 250:This article is supported by the 3785: 3651: 3607: 3571: 3526: 3426: 3383: 3267:where a needlessly hostile user 2774: 2751: 2705: 2667: 2623: 2482: 2434: 2211:wagging your angry little finger 1830:http://www.dawn.com/news/1156745 1032: 984: 667: 620: 575: 529: 497:My material was not copyrighted! 306: 296: 269: 210:regional and topical task forces 181: 171: 147: 116: 87: 30: 3810:until a consensus is reached. 2558: 2286:deleting records for no reason. 1956:Wiki page for over a year now. 1675:office holders do carry weights 1435:, etc.) This is all covered in 361:This article has been rated as 94:This article was nominated for 3856:C-Class Indian cinema articles 3705:PK was released in Hindi only 3277:currently and reliably sourced 1: 3876:Low-importance India articles 3247:14:17, 13 February 2015 (UTC) 3228:14:03, 13 February 2015 (UTC) 2887:and from my understanding of 1110:and present the content in a 903:05:53, 30 December 2014 (UTC) 882:05:11, 30 December 2014 (UTC) 848:04:04, 30 December 2014 (UTC) 822:03:45, 30 December 2014 (UTC) 808:19:15, 29 December 2014 (UTC) 759:03:54, 29 December 2014 (UTC) 739:01:39, 29 December 2014 (UTC) 700:15:22, 24 December 2014 (UTC) 661:03:33, 24 December 2014 (UTC) 607:16:45, 23 December 2014 (UTC) 569:15:31, 23 December 2014 (UTC) 517:04:36, 21 December 2014 (UTC) 462:17:41, 3 September 2014 (UTC) 383:This article is supported by 3832:05:36, 4 February 2024 (UTC) 3594:12:09, 20 January 2016 (UTC) 3565:01:49, 20 January 2016 (UTC) 3281:reliable sources noticeboard 3183:12:21, 3 February 2015 (UTC) 3166:06:57, 3 February 2015 (UTC) 3073:08:06, 2 February 2015 (UTC) 3047:07:01, 2 February 2015 (UTC) 2958:16:35, 30 January 2015 (UTC) 2935:07:38, 30 January 2015 (UTC) 2913:07:30, 30 January 2015 (UTC) 2868:03:55, 30 January 2015 (UTC) 2796:05:19, 25 January 2015 (UTC) 2770:04:54, 25 January 2015 (UTC) 2745:02:14, 25 January 2015 (UTC) 2692:18:11, 19 January 2015 (UTC) 2662:17:55, 19 January 2015 (UTC) 2608:12:58, 22 January 2015 (UTC) 2587:22:19, 17 January 2015 (UTC) 2572:15:10, 17 January 2015 (UTC) 2527:05:50, 17 January 2015 (UTC) 2501:18:37, 14 January 2015 (UTC) 2476:17:25, 14 January 2015 (UTC) 2421:20:53, 13 January 2015 (UTC) 2406:08:42, 12 January 2015 (UTC) 2375:18:49, 15 January 2015 (UTC) 2344:20:41, 14 January 2015 (UTC) 2302:09:57, 11 January 2015 (UTC) 2257:00:26, 11 January 2015 (UTC) 2232:23:17, 10 January 2015 (UTC) 2159:18:10, 10 January 2015 (UTC) 2136:15:54, 10 January 2015 (UTC) 2102:13:31, 10 January 2015 (UTC) 2088:01:32, 10 January 2015 (UTC) 2062:00:22, 10 January 2015 (UTC) 2038:00:17, 10 January 2015 (UTC) 2016:00:01, 10 January 2015 (UTC) 1937:Attempts of Deleting Records 1734:09:01, 12 January 2015 (UTC) 1707:08:32, 12 January 2015 (UTC) 1669:08:19, 12 January 2015 (UTC) 1614:07:36, 12 January 2015 (UTC) 1596:07:30, 12 January 2015 (UTC) 1578:07:23, 12 January 2015 (UTC) 1547:06:39, 12 January 2015 (UTC) 1303:11:09, 22 January 2015 (UTC) 1267:17:52, 19 January 2015 (UTC) 1244:14:08, 19 January 2015 (UTC) 491:06:18, 9 December 2014 (UTC) 434:07:59, 19 January 2013 (UTC) 3630:to reactivate your request. 3618:has been answered. Set the 3580:read the references - e.g. 3549:to reactivate your request. 3537:has been answered. Set the 3406:to reactivate your request. 3394:has been answered. Set the 3352:You absolutely said that. " 2883:, from what I am aware per 2728:to reactivate your request. 2716:has been answered. Set the 2646:to reactivate your request. 2634:has been answered. Set the 2556:. These two are not same. - 2457:to reactivate your request. 2445:has been answered. Set the 1990:23:43, 9 January 2015 (UTC) 1966:23:32, 9 January 2015 (UTC) 1824:20:22, 9 January 2015 (UTC) 1798:19:46, 9 January 2015 (UTC) 1785:9 January 2015 19:45 (UTC) 1776:15:26, 7 January 2015 (UTC) 1517:01:58, 7 January 2015 (UTC) 1489:19:14, 6 January 2015 (UTC) 1412:18:21, 6 January 2015 (UTC) 1402:17:59, 6 January 2015 (UTC) 1385:17:31, 6 January 2015 (UTC) 1370:17:07, 6 January 2015 (UTC) 1335:16:35, 6 January 2015 (UTC) 1283:and here is online protest 1230:13:17, 5 January 2015 (UTC) 1214:12:43, 5 January 2015 (UTC) 1193:05:06, 5 January 2015 (UTC) 1124:18:02, 4 January 2015 (UTC) 1098:17:54, 4 January 2015 (UTC) 1078:09:22, 4 January 2015 (UTC) 1053:13:16, 1 January 2015 (UTC) 1027:08:52, 1 January 2015 (UTC) 1007:to reactivate your request. 995:has been answered. Set the 957:22:15, 9 January 2015 (UTC) 940:21:55, 9 January 2015 (UTC) 925:21:36, 9 January 2015 (UTC) 643:to reactivate your request. 631:has been answered. Set the 552:to reactivate your request. 540:has been answered. Set the 386:the Indian cinema workgroup 341:Knowledge:WikiProject India 3917: 3901:WikiProject India articles 3769:07:08, 12 March 2019 (UTC) 3747:, Khan played nine avatars 3669:20:39, 27 April 2016 (UTC) 3646:19:48, 27 April 2016 (UTC) 2205:of wrong-doing. Regarding 1529:Why the Senior BJP leader 1059:I changed the plot summary 764:Could PK be inspired from 422:Happy New Year (2013 film) 367:project's importance scale 344:Template:WikiProject India 226:Knowledge:WikiProject Film 3866:WikiProject Film articles 3514:16:58, 16 July 2015 (UTC) 3452:08:06, 25 June 2015 (UTC) 3421:06:40, 25 June 2015 (UTC) 3366:23:24, 22 June 2015 (UTC) 3348:17:22, 22 June 2015 (UTC) 3334:18:03, 18 June 2015 (UTC) 3316:16:19, 18 June 2015 (UTC) 3297:16:49, 9 March 2015 (UTC) 3203:04:47, 1 March 2015 (UTC) 1921:17:57, 1 March 2015 (UTC) 1888:05:39, 1 March 2015 (UTC) 1600:Further, you should read 1429:Five Pillars of Knowledge 382: 360: 291: 249: 229:Template:WikiProject Film 166: 142: 3798:redirects for discussion 3780:Redirects for discussion 2829:mentiones the genre as 2821:Comedy | Drama | Fantasy 2186:Corruption in BO figures 253:Indian cinema task force 3724:miscellaneous questions 3719:14:07, 8 May 2017 (UTC) 3096:mentions the genre as 2603:aka The Red Pen of Doom 2416:aka The Red Pen of Doom 2339:aka The Red Pen of Doom 2252:aka The Red Pen of Doom 2213:, It might appear like 2097:aka The Red Pen of Doom 2057:aka The Red Pen of Doom 1874:aka The Red Pen of Doom 1793:aka The Red Pen of Doom 1425:a neutral point of view 1209:aka The Red Pen of Doom 1083:No Controversy section? 952:aka The Red Pen of Doom 898:aka The Red Pen of Doom 843:aka The Red Pen of Doom 773:22:52, 5 May 2015 (UTC) 55:December 21 to 27, 2014 49:December 14 to 20, 2014 3871:C-Class India articles 2899:initially, as is your 2219:hard punch on his face 1471: 1459:Contemporary responses 1202:"controversy" section" 1130:Love Jihad controversy 591:and make the change. 379: 246: 124:This article is rated 73:January 11 to 17, 2015 3851:C-Class film articles 2534:hasn't been confirmed 1811:argument from silence 1353:neutral point of view 1112:neutral point of view 872:on Box Office India. 830:using BOI, but it is 792:Template:Infobox film 378: 245: 67:January 4 to 10, 2015 2180:Dhoom3 Records table 1685:itself states that " 1582:What do you mean by 1451:100% approval rating 1251:this article's photo 794:, 2) Other sources, 442:Add the other poster 3802:redirect guidelines 3796:has been listed at 3493:Even this sentence 2068:Avatar Records Page 2021:WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS 1809:This looks like an 1427:. It is one of the 1067:Thanks and regards, 826:Clearly we are not 202:join the discussion 2981:other stuff exists 2182:is twice as large. 1332:User:Jackthomas321 420:upcomg film. Like 380: 247: 130:content assessment 3657:Not done for now: 3634: 3633: 3553: 3552: 3438:Please also cite 3410: 3409: 3302:Cassette recorder 3022: 3020:) 30 January 2015 3008:comment added by 2871: 2854:comment added by 2732: 2731: 2650: 2649: 2604: 2461: 2460: 2417: 2340: 2253: 2098: 2058: 1875: 1794: 1673:First of all yes 1535:balancing aspects 1476:non-autoconfirmed 1433:original research 1210: 1196: 1179:comment added by 1011: 1010: 953: 899: 844: 786:, with regard to 698: 647: 646: 605: 556: 555: 493: 481:comment added by 452:comment added by 405: 404: 401: 400: 397: 396: 322:WikiProject India 264: 263: 260: 259: 204:and see lists of 110: 109: 82: 81: 16:(Redirected from 3908: 3830: 3795: 3789: 3748: 3734: 3655: 3654: 3625: 3621: 3611: 3610: 3604: 3579: 3575: 3574: 3544: 3540: 3530: 3529: 3523: 3506:Pradeep Kulkarni 3440:reliable sources 3430: 3429: 3401: 3397: 3387: 3386: 3380: 3144: 3131: 3113: 3091: 3037: 3021: 3002: 2974: 2897:reliable sources 2893:reliable sources 2882: 2870: 2848: 2793: 2788: 2778: 2777: 2759: 2755: 2754: 2723: 2719: 2709: 2708: 2702: 2689: 2683: 2677:reliable sources 2671: 2670: 2641: 2637: 2627: 2626: 2620: 2605: 2602: 2569: 2562: 2536:, and so we use 2490: 2486: 2485: 2452: 2448: 2438: 2437: 2431: 2418: 2415: 2341: 2338: 2267: 2254: 2251: 2169: 2112: 2099: 2096: 2077: 2059: 2056: 2000: 1947: 1909: 1876: 1873: 1795: 1792: 1774: 1763: 1754:Can we consider 1584:too many of them 1514: 1506: 1500: 1422: 1395: 1346: 1211: 1208: 1195: 1173: 1108:reliable sources 1036: 1035: 1002: 998: 988: 987: 981: 954: 951: 900: 897: 858: 845: 842: 688: 675: 671: 670: 638: 634: 624: 623: 617: 595: 583: 579: 578: 547: 543: 533: 532: 526: 464: 349: 348: 345: 342: 339: 316: 311: 310: 309: 300: 293: 292: 287: 284: 273: 266: 234: 233: 230: 227: 224: 197:WikiProject Film 191: 186: 185: 184: 175: 168: 167: 162: 151: 144: 127: 121: 120: 112: 91: 84: 34: 33: 27: 21: 18:Talk:P.K. (film) 3916: 3915: 3911: 3910: 3909: 3907: 3906: 3905: 3836: 3835: 3829: 3811: 3791: 3783: 3726: 3677: 3652: 3623: 3619: 3608: 3602: 3572: 3570: 3557:101.190.233.113 3542: 3538: 3527: 3521: 3460: 3427: 3399: 3395: 3384: 3378: 3304: 3257: 3242: 3213: 3158:Frost The World 3138: 3125: 3107: 3094:Rotten Tomatoes 3085: 3039:Frost The World 3031: 3003: 2971:Frost The World 2968: 2879:Frost The World 2876: 2856:Frost The World 2849: 2827:Rotten Tomatoes 2804: 2789: 2784: 2775: 2752: 2750: 2721: 2717: 2706: 2700: 2687: 2681: 2675:please provide 2668: 2639: 2635: 2624: 2618: 2600: 2550:possible sequel 2509: 2507:Possible sequel 2483: 2481: 2450: 2446: 2435: 2429: 2413: 2396:from the page? 2387: 2336: 2264:TheRedPenOfDoom 2261: 2249: 2203:TheRedPenOfDoom 2163: 2109:TheRedPenOfDoom 2106: 2094: 2074:TheRedPenOfDoom 2071: 2054: 2003:Dhoom 3 Records 1994: 1954:Dhoom 3 Records 1944:TheRedPenOfDoom 1941: 1939: 1903: 1871: 1790: 1764: 1759: 1752: 1510: 1502: 1496: 1455:Rotten Tomatoes 1416: 1389: 1340: 1310: 1295:Frost The World 1236:Frost The World 1222:Frost The World 1206: 1181:Frost The World 1174: 1132: 1085: 1061: 1033: 1000: 996: 985: 979: 949: 895: 870:this discussion 866:reliable source 852: 840: 780: 708: 668: 666: 636: 632: 621: 615: 576: 574: 545: 541: 530: 524: 499: 470: 447: 444: 413:P.K.(2014 film) 410: 346: 343: 340: 337: 336: 312: 307: 305: 285: 279: 231: 228: 225: 222: 221: 187: 182: 180: 157: 128:on Knowledge's 125: 78: 31: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 3914: 3912: 3904: 3903: 3898: 3893: 3888: 3883: 3878: 3873: 3868: 3863: 3858: 3853: 3848: 3838: 3837: 3815: 3782: 3772: 3750: 3749: 3736: 3735: 3725: 3722: 3706: 3704: 3698: 3694: 3693:second source: 3690: 3684: 3680: 3676: 3673: 3672: 3671: 3632: 3631: 3612: 3601: 3598: 3597: 3596: 3551: 3550: 3531: 3520: 3517: 3499: 3498: 3490: 3489: 3477: 3476: 3468: 3467: 3459: 3456: 3455: 3454: 3437: 3435: 3408: 3407: 3388: 3377: 3374: 3373: 3372: 3371: 3370: 3369: 3368: 3303: 3300: 3256: 3253: 3252: 3251: 3250: 3249: 3240: 3212: 3209: 3208: 3207: 3206: 3205: 3188: 3187: 3186: 3185: 3152: 3151: 3150: 3149: 3104: 3103: 3102: 3101: 3080: 3079: 3078: 3077: 3076: 3075: 3052: 3051: 3050: 3049: 3024: 3023: 2965: 2964: 2963: 2962: 2961: 2960: 2940: 2939: 2938: 2937: 2916: 2915: 2845: 2811:rottentomatoes 2803: 2800: 2799: 2798: 2772: 2730: 2729: 2710: 2699: 2696: 2695: 2694: 2648: 2647: 2628: 2617: 2614: 2613: 2612: 2611: 2610: 2589: 2508: 2505: 2504: 2503: 2459: 2458: 2439: 2428: 2425: 2424: 2423: 2391:Swami Agnivesh 2386: 2385:Swami Agnivesh 2383: 2382: 2381: 2380: 2379: 2378: 2377: 2349: 2348: 2347: 2346: 2325: 2324: 2323: 2322: 2321: 2320: 2319: 2318: 2317: 2316: 2315: 2314: 2313: 2312: 2311: 2310: 2309: 2308: 2307: 2306: 2305: 2304: 2119:Avatar Records 2115:Avatar Records 1974:most important 1950:Niloferqureshi 1938: 1935: 1934: 1933: 1932: 1931: 1930: 1929: 1928: 1927: 1926: 1925: 1924: 1923: 1841: 1840: 1839: 1838: 1837: 1836: 1835: 1834: 1833: 1832: 1751: 1748: 1747: 1746: 1745: 1744: 1743: 1742: 1741: 1740: 1739: 1738: 1737: 1736: 1621: 1620: 1619: 1618: 1617: 1616: 1598: 1550: 1549: 1526: 1525: 1524: 1523: 1522: 1521: 1520: 1519: 1472: 1404: 1372: 1309: 1306: 1270: 1269: 1217: 1216: 1131: 1128: 1127: 1126: 1084: 1081: 1068: 1066: 1064: 1060: 1057: 1056: 1055: 1009: 1008: 989: 978: 975: 974: 973: 972: 971: 970: 969: 968: 967: 966: 965: 964: 963: 962: 961: 960: 959: 927: 779: 776: 766:P K Mahanandia 762: 761: 707: 704: 703: 702: 645: 644: 625: 614: 611: 610: 609: 554: 553: 534: 523: 520: 509:Kashisharora11 498: 495: 483:178.117.244.22 469: 466: 454:49.205.191.123 443: 440: 438: 409: 406: 403: 402: 399: 398: 395: 394: 391:Low-importance 381: 371: 370: 363:Low-importance 359: 353: 352: 350: 347:India articles 318: 317: 301: 289: 288: 286:Low‑importance 274: 262: 261: 258: 257: 248: 238: 237: 235: 193: 192: 176: 164: 163: 152: 140: 139: 133: 122: 108: 107: 100:the discussion 92: 80: 79: 77: 76: 70: 64: 58: 52: 45: 35: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3913: 3902: 3899: 3897: 3894: 3892: 3889: 3887: 3884: 3882: 3879: 3877: 3874: 3872: 3869: 3867: 3864: 3862: 3859: 3857: 3854: 3852: 3849: 3847: 3844: 3843: 3841: 3834: 3833: 3827: 3826: 3821: 3820: 3814: 3809: 3808: 3803: 3799: 3794: 3790:The redirect 3788: 3781: 3777: 3773: 3771: 3770: 3766: 3762: 3758: 3753: 3746: 3741: 3740: 3739: 3731: 3730: 3729: 3723: 3721: 3720: 3716: 3712: 3707: 3703: 3697: 3691: 3689: 3683: 3674: 3670: 3666: 3662: 3658: 3650: 3649: 3648: 3647: 3643: 3639: 3629: 3626:parameter to 3617: 3613: 3606: 3605: 3599: 3595: 3591: 3587: 3583: 3578: 3569: 3568: 3567: 3566: 3562: 3558: 3548: 3545:parameter to 3536: 3532: 3525: 3524: 3518: 3516: 3515: 3511: 3507: 3502: 3496: 3492: 3491: 3487: 3483: 3479: 3478: 3474: 3470: 3469: 3465: 3464: 3463: 3457: 3453: 3449: 3445: 3441: 3433: 3425: 3424: 3423: 3422: 3418: 3414: 3413:182.186.21.28 3405: 3402:parameter to 3393: 3389: 3382: 3381: 3375: 3367: 3363: 3359: 3355: 3351: 3350: 3349: 3345: 3341: 3337: 3336: 3335: 3331: 3327: 3323: 3320: 3319: 3318: 3317: 3313: 3309: 3301: 3299: 3298: 3294: 3290: 3286: 3282: 3278: 3274: 3269: 3266: 3262: 3254: 3248: 3245: 3243: 3237: 3234: 3233: 3232: 3231: 3230: 3229: 3225: 3221: 3217: 3210: 3204: 3200: 3196: 3195:CosmicEmperor 3192: 3191: 3190: 3189: 3184: 3180: 3176: 3172: 3171: 3170: 3169: 3168: 3167: 3163: 3159: 3156: 3148: 3142: 3136: 3135: 3134: 3133: 3132: 3129: 3121: 3118: 3111: 3099: 3095: 3089: 3084: 3083: 3082: 3081: 3074: 3070: 3066: 3062: 3058: 3057: 3056: 3055: 3054: 3053: 3048: 3044: 3040: 3035: 3028: 3027: 3026: 3025: 3019: 3015: 3011: 3007: 3000: 2996: 2992: 2986: 2982: 2979:—This is an " 2978: 2972: 2967: 2966: 2959: 2955: 2951: 2946: 2945: 2944: 2943: 2942: 2941: 2936: 2932: 2928: 2924: 2920: 2919: 2918: 2917: 2914: 2910: 2906: 2902: 2898: 2894: 2890: 2886: 2880: 2874: 2873: 2872: 2869: 2865: 2861: 2857: 2853: 2846: 2843: 2840: 2837: 2833: 2832: 2828: 2824: 2822: 2818: 2814: 2812: 2808: 2801: 2797: 2794: 2792: 2787: 2781: 2773: 2771: 2767: 2763: 2758: 2749: 2748: 2747: 2746: 2742: 2738: 2727: 2724:parameter to 2715: 2711: 2704: 2703: 2697: 2693: 2690: 2684: 2678: 2674: 2666: 2665: 2664: 2663: 2659: 2655: 2645: 2642:parameter to 2633: 2629: 2622: 2621: 2615: 2609: 2606: 2597: 2593: 2590: 2588: 2584: 2580: 2575: 2574: 2573: 2570: 2568: 2563: 2561: 2555: 2551: 2547: 2543: 2539: 2535: 2531: 2530: 2529: 2528: 2524: 2520: 2515: 2513: 2506: 2502: 2498: 2494: 2489: 2480: 2479: 2478: 2477: 2473: 2469: 2468:117.228.6.251 2466: 2456: 2453:parameter to 2444: 2440: 2433: 2432: 2426: 2422: 2419: 2410: 2409: 2408: 2407: 2403: 2399: 2395: 2392: 2384: 2376: 2372: 2368: 2364: 2360: 2355: 2354: 2353: 2352: 2351: 2350: 2345: 2342: 2332: 2331: 2330: 2329: 2328: 2303: 2299: 2295: 2294:Jackthomas321 2291: 2287: 2283: 2279: 2277: 2270: 2265: 2260: 2259: 2258: 2255: 2246: 2242: 2241: 2235: 2234: 2233: 2229: 2225: 2224:Jackthomas321 2220: 2216: 2215:little finger 2212: 2208: 2204: 2200: 2195: 2191: 2187: 2183: 2181: 2176: 2167: 2162: 2161: 2160: 2156: 2152: 2147: 2143: 2139: 2138: 2137: 2133: 2129: 2128:Jackthomas321 2124: 2120: 2116: 2110: 2105: 2104: 2103: 2100: 2091: 2090: 2089: 2085: 2081: 2080:Jackthomas321 2075: 2069: 2065: 2064: 2063: 2060: 2051: 2050: 2044: 2041: 2040: 2039: 2035: 2031: 2027: 2026:Talk:Drishyam 2022: 2019: 2018: 2017: 2013: 2009: 2008:Jackthomas321 2004: 1998: 1993: 1992: 1991: 1987: 1983: 1979: 1975: 1970: 1969: 1968: 1967: 1963: 1959: 1958:Jackthomas321 1955: 1951: 1945: 1936: 1922: 1918: 1914: 1907: 1906:CosmicEmperor 1902: 1901: 1900: 1899: 1898: 1897: 1896: 1895: 1894: 1893: 1892: 1891: 1890: 1889: 1885: 1881: 1880:CosmicEmperor 1877: 1868: 1864: 1860: 1859:Jackthomas321 1856: 1855: 1851: 1850: 1846: 1845: 1831: 1827: 1826: 1825: 1821: 1817: 1812: 1808: 1807: 1806: 1805:Jackthomas321 1801: 1800: 1799: 1796: 1787: 1786: 1784: 1783:Jackthomas321 1780: 1779: 1778: 1777: 1772: 1771:Contributions 1768: 1762: 1757: 1749: 1735: 1731: 1727: 1723: 1719: 1715: 1710: 1709: 1708: 1704: 1700: 1696: 1692: 1688: 1684: 1680: 1676: 1672: 1671: 1670: 1666: 1662: 1658: 1654: 1650: 1646: 1641: 1637: 1633: 1629: 1628: 1627: 1626: 1625: 1624: 1623: 1622: 1615: 1611: 1607: 1603: 1599: 1597: 1593: 1589: 1585: 1581: 1580: 1579: 1575: 1571: 1567: 1563: 1559: 1554: 1553: 1552: 1551: 1548: 1544: 1540: 1536: 1532: 1528: 1527: 1518: 1515: 1513: 1508: 1507: 1505: 1499: 1492: 1491: 1490: 1486: 1482: 1477: 1473: 1470: 1468: 1460: 1457:. Yet in the 1456: 1452: 1449:. It holds a 1448: 1444: 1443: 1438: 1434: 1430: 1426: 1420: 1419:Jackthomas321 1415: 1414: 1413: 1410: 1409:Jackthomas321 1405: 1403: 1400: 1399:Jackthomas321 1393: 1388: 1387: 1386: 1382: 1378: 1373: 1371: 1367: 1363: 1359: 1354: 1350: 1344: 1343:Jackthomas321 1339: 1338: 1337: 1336: 1333: 1328: 1327:User:Krimuk90 1323: 1322:User:Krimuk90 1319: 1315: 1307: 1305: 1304: 1300: 1296: 1293: 1289: 1288: 1284: 1281: 1280: 1276: 1275: 1268: 1264: 1260: 1256: 1252: 1248: 1247: 1246: 1245: 1241: 1237: 1232: 1231: 1227: 1223: 1215: 1212: 1203: 1199: 1198: 1197: 1194: 1190: 1186: 1182: 1178: 1172: 1168: 1167: 1163: 1162: 1158: 1157: 1153: 1152: 1148: 1147: 1143: 1142: 1138: 1137: 1129: 1125: 1121: 1117: 1113: 1109: 1105: 1102: 1101: 1100: 1099: 1095: 1091: 1082: 1080: 1079: 1075: 1071: 1058: 1054: 1050: 1046: 1043: 1039: 1031: 1030: 1029: 1028: 1024: 1020: 1015: 1006: 1003:parameter to 994: 990: 983: 982: 976: 958: 955: 945: 944: 943: 942: 941: 937: 933: 932:Jackthomas321 928: 926: 922: 918: 917:Jackthomas321 914: 910: 906: 905: 904: 901: 892: 888: 885: 884: 883: 879: 875: 871: 867: 862: 856: 851: 850: 849: 846: 838:than most.-- 837: 833: 829: 825: 824: 823: 820: 819: 814: 813: 812: 811: 810: 809: 805: 801: 797: 796:like Deadline 793: 789: 785: 777: 775: 774: 771: 767: 760: 756: 752: 748: 743: 742: 741: 740: 736: 732: 726: 722: 718: 715: 711: 705: 701: 696: 692: 687: 683: 679: 674: 665: 664: 663: 662: 658: 654: 650: 642: 639:parameter to 630: 626: 619: 618: 612: 608: 603: 599: 594: 590: 586: 582: 573: 572: 571: 570: 566: 562: 551: 548:parameter to 539: 535: 528: 527: 521: 519: 518: 514: 510: 506: 503: 496: 494: 492: 488: 484: 480: 475: 467: 465: 463: 459: 455: 451: 441: 439: 436: 435: 431: 427: 423: 419: 414: 407: 392: 389:(assessed as 388: 387: 377: 373: 372: 368: 364: 358: 355: 354: 351: 334: 333: 328: 324: 323: 315: 304: 302: 299: 295: 294: 290: 283: 278: 275: 272: 268: 255: 254: 244: 240: 239: 236: 232:film articles 219: 215: 214:documentation 211: 207: 203: 199: 198: 190: 179: 177: 174: 170: 169: 165: 161: 156: 153: 150: 146: 141: 137: 131: 123: 119: 114: 113: 105: 101: 97: 93: 90: 86: 85: 74: 71: 68: 65: 62: 59: 56: 53: 50: 47: 46: 43: 40: 39:Top 25 Report 36: 29: 28: 19: 3823: 3817: 3805: 3793:Peekay(film) 3784: 3778:" listed at 3776:Peekay(film) 3757:Ek Tha Talli 3756: 3754: 3751: 3744: 3737: 3727: 3708: 3700: 3692: 3686: 3678: 3656: 3635: 3627: 3616:edit request 3576: 3554: 3546: 3535:edit request 3503: 3500: 3494: 3488:meeting him. 3485: 3481: 3472: 3461: 3431: 3411: 3403: 3392:edit request 3305: 3276: 3258: 3235: 3214: 3153: 3128:Kailash29792 3122: 3110:Kailash29792 3105: 3097: 3004:— Preceding 2989: 2927:Kailash29792 2922: 2850:— Preceding 2847: 2844: 2841: 2838: 2834: 2830: 2825: 2820: 2819:calls it as 2815: 2805: 2790: 2785: 2779: 2762:Kailash29792 2756: 2733: 2725: 2714:edit request 2672: 2651: 2643: 2632:edit request 2566: 2559: 2553: 2549: 2545: 2541: 2537: 2533: 2510: 2487: 2462: 2454: 2443:edit request 2388: 2326: 2289: 2285: 2272: 2268: 2239: 2237: 2218: 2214: 2210: 2206: 2198: 2185: 2172: 2145: 2049:encyclopedia 2048: 1977: 1973: 1940: 1857: 1852: 1847: 1842: 1753: 1722:WP:CONSENSUS 1713: 1686: 1677:and nowhere 1639: 1583: 1562:WP:CONSENSUS 1511: 1503: 1501: 1497: 1466: 1464: 1450: 1442:Citizen Kane 1440: 1311: 1290: 1285: 1282: 1277: 1271: 1233: 1218: 1175:— Preceding 1169: 1164: 1159: 1154: 1149: 1144: 1139: 1133: 1086: 1062: 1037: 1016: 1012: 1004: 993:edit request 835: 831: 827: 816: 781: 763: 727: 723: 719: 716: 712: 709: 672: 651: 648: 640: 629:edit request 580: 557: 549: 538:edit request 507: 504: 500: 477:— Preceding 471: 448:— Preceding 445: 437: 411: 384: 362: 332:project page 330: 320: 314:India portal 251: 195: 136:WikiProjects 103: 41: 3711:Rashkeqamar 3688:Conclusion. 3661:Cyphoidbomb 3358:Cyphoidbomb 3326:Cyphoidbomb 3289:Cyphoidbomb 3261:these edits 3175:Cyphoidbomb 3141:Cyphoidbomb 3088:Cyphoidbomb 3065:Cyphoidbomb 3034:Cyphoidbomb 3010:Cyphoidbomb 2950:Cyphoidbomb 2905:Cyphoidbomb 2688:Let's talk! 2579:Cyphoidbomb 2519:Cyphoidbomb 2493:Cyphoidbomb 2367:Cyphoidbomb 2282:Cyphoidbomb 2276:Cyphoidbomb 2190:Take a look 2166:Cyphoidbomb 2151:Cyphoidbomb 2030:Cyphoidbomb 1997:Cyphoidbomb 1982:Cyphoidbomb 1913:Cyphoidbomb 1863:Cyphoidbomb 1816:Cyphoidbomb 1756:this source 1726:Cyphoidbomb 1661:Cyphoidbomb 1570:Cyphoidbomb 1481:Cyphoidbomb 1437:WP:FILMPLOT 1392:Cyphoidbomb 1377:Cyphoidbomb 1362:Cyphoidbomb 1259:Cyphoidbomb 1116:Cyphoidbomb 1104:27.34.84.55 1090:27.34.84.55 1070:Bkpsusmitaa 855:Cyphoidbomb 800:Cyphoidbomb 751:Cyphoidbomb 426:Abhinavname 189:Film portal 3840:Categories 3755:What does 3699:text here 3685:text here 3638:Ns harmony 3620:|answered= 3539:|answered= 3396:|answered= 3340:Polytope4d 3322:Polytope4d 3308:Polytope4d 3137:And since 3117:Aamir Khan 3061:WP:RS/IMDB 2885:WP:RS/IMDB 2718:|answered= 2636:|answered= 2447:|answered= 2398:Srikanlohs 2393:'s comment 2240:by anyone" 2194:Aamir Khan 2123:Corruption 1699:Srikanlohs 1683:WP:BALANCE 1606:Srikanlohs 1588:Srikanlohs 1539:Srikanlohs 997:|answered= 686:G S Palmer 633:|answered= 593:G S Palmer 542:|answered= 218:guidelines 206:open tasks 3504:Regards, 3432:Not done: 3265:this edit 2985:synthesis 2682:Anupmehra 2673:Not done: 2654:Ricky8741 2542:Marketing 1657:consensus 1558:LK Advani 1531:LK Advani 1358:this edit 1042:this edit 1019:Stammewar 788:this edit 770:Emailsson 768:'s life? 653:Sanjay921 505:Regards. 418:Bollywood 3582:this one 3577:Not done 3018:contribs 3006:unsigned 2923:reliable 2864:contribs 2852:unsigned 2596:WP:UNDUE 2538:possible 1653:Krimuk90 1645:WP:UNDUE 1632:WP:UNDUE 1602:WP:UNDUE 1255:WP:UNDUE 1189:contribs 1177:unsigned 1045:Cannolis 731:கா. சேது 695:contribs 682:Eustress 673:Not done 602:contribs 561:Arramees 479:unsigned 468:Location 450:unsigned 96:deletion 3761:Tamfang 3759:mean? — 3586:Arjayay 3444:Arjayay 3241:Gremlin 3220:Tigraan 2836:ref.) 2737:Rushiil 2560:Ascetic 2175:Dhoom 3 2045:Simply 1718:WP:DRNC 1636:WP:NPOV 909:Rentrak 891:WP:NPOV 680:or ask 678:WP:RFPP 365:on the 126:C-class 3813:Utopes 3482:before 3236:Agreed 2901:burden 2601:TRPoD 2414:TRPoD 2337:TRPoD 2250:TRPoD 2245:WP:ANI 2142:WP:ANI 2095:TRPoD 2055:TRPoD 1872:TRPoD 1791:TRPoD 1714:Django 1649:WP:BRD 1566:WP:BRD 1498:KRIMUK 1207:TRPoD 950:TRPoD 913:Koimoi 896:TRPoD 874:Arjann 861:Koimoi 841:TRPoD 836:better 784:Arjann 747:WP:RSN 282:Cinema 160:Indian 132:scale. 75:(19th) 3624:|ans= 3614:This 3543:|ans= 3533:This 3486:after 3400:|ans= 3390:This 3216:Here. 2889:WP:RS 2802:Genre 2786:Davey 2722:|ans= 2712:This 2640:|ans= 2630:This 2451:|ans= 2441:This 2247:. -- 2052:. -- 1761:Rahat 1204:. -- 1001:|ans= 991:This 818:Sahir 637:|ans= 627:This 546:|ans= 536:This 338:India 327:India 277:India 69:(5th) 63:(1st) 57:(3rd) 51:(6th) 3825:cont 3819:talk 3765:talk 3715:talk 3665:talk 3642:talk 3590:talk 3561:talk 3510:talk 3458:Plot 3448:talk 3417:talk 3362:talk 3344:talk 3330:talk 3312:talk 3293:talk 3273:here 3263:and 3224:talk 3199:talk 3179:talk 3162:talk 3106:And 3069:talk 3043:talk 3014:talk 2991:48%. 2954:talk 2931:talk 2909:talk 2860:talk 2817:IMDB 2809:and 2807:IMDB 2791:2010 2780:Done 2766:talk 2757:Done 2741:talk 2658:talk 2583:talk 2567:Rosé 2523:talk 2497:talk 2488:Done 2472:talk 2402:talk 2371:talk 2298:talk 2228:talk 2155:talk 2146:must 2132:talk 2084:talk 2034:talk 2012:talk 1986:talk 1962:talk 1917:talk 1884:talk 1869:) , 1867:talk 1820:talk 1767:Talk 1730:talk 1703:talk 1679:NPOV 1665:talk 1640:some 1610:talk 1592:talk 1574:talk 1543:talk 1485:talk 1381:talk 1366:talk 1318:here 1314:here 1299:talk 1263:talk 1240:talk 1226:talk 1185:talk 1120:talk 1094:talk 1074:talk 1049:talk 1038:Done 1023:talk 936:talk 921:talk 887:WP:V 878:talk 828:only 804:talk 755:talk 735:talk 691:talk 657:talk 598:talk 581:Done 565:talk 513:talk 487:talk 458:talk 430:talk 223:Film 208:and 155:Film 104:keep 102:was 3743:In 3622:or 3541:or 3398:or 3092:If 2875:Hi 2720:or 2638:or 2552:of 2449:or 1978:all 1750:RS? 1453:at 1445:is 1040:by 999:or 832:one 782:Hi 635:or 589:AGF 544:or 357:Low 3842:: 3822:/ 3767:) 3745:PK 3717:) 3667:) 3644:) 3628:no 3592:) 3563:) 3547:no 3512:) 3450:) 3419:) 3404:no 3364:) 3346:) 3332:) 3314:) 3295:) 3226:) 3201:) 3181:) 3164:) 3071:) 3045:) 3016:• 3001:) 2997:, 2956:) 2933:) 2911:) 2866:) 2862:• 2823:- 2768:) 2743:) 2726:no 2660:) 2644:no 2585:) 2554:PK 2546:PK 2525:) 2499:) 2474:) 2455:no 2404:) 2373:) 2300:) 2230:) 2192:. 2157:) 2134:) 2086:) 2036:) 2014:) 1988:) 1964:) 1919:) 1886:) 1861:, 1822:) 1769:* 1732:) 1705:) 1667:) 1612:) 1594:) 1576:) 1545:) 1504:90 1487:) 1467:PK 1383:) 1368:) 1301:) 1265:) 1242:) 1228:) 1191:) 1187:• 1122:) 1114:. 1096:) 1088:-- 1076:) 1051:) 1025:) 1005:no 938:) 923:) 889:/ 880:) 806:) 757:) 737:) 693:• 659:) 641:no 600:• 584:: 567:) 550:no 515:) 489:) 460:) 432:) 393:). 280:: 158:: 3828:) 3816:( 3774:" 3763:( 3713:( 3663:( 3640:( 3588:( 3559:( 3508:( 3475:. 3446:( 3415:( 3360:( 3342:( 3328:( 3310:( 3291:( 3222:( 3197:( 3177:( 3160:( 3143:: 3139:@ 3130:: 3126:@ 3112:: 3108:@ 3090:: 3086:@ 3067:( 3041:( 3036:: 3032:@ 3012:( 2999:2 2995:1 2973:: 2969:@ 2952:( 2929:( 2907:( 2881:: 2877:@ 2858:( 2782:– 2764:( 2739:( 2685:- 2656:( 2581:( 2521:( 2495:( 2470:( 2400:( 2369:( 2296:( 2266:: 2262:@ 2226:( 2168:: 2164:@ 2153:( 2130:( 2111:: 2107:@ 2082:( 2076:: 2072:@ 2032:( 2010:( 1999:: 1995:@ 1984:( 1960:( 1946:: 1942:@ 1915:( 1908:: 1904:@ 1882:( 1865:( 1818:( 1773:) 1765:( 1728:( 1701:( 1663:( 1608:( 1590:( 1572:( 1541:( 1512:✉ 1483:( 1421:: 1417:@ 1394:: 1390:@ 1379:( 1364:( 1345:: 1341:@ 1297:( 1261:( 1238:( 1224:( 1183:( 1118:( 1092:( 1072:( 1047:( 1021:( 934:( 919:( 876:( 857:: 853:@ 802:( 753:( 733:( 697:) 689:( 655:( 604:) 596:( 563:( 511:( 485:( 456:( 428:( 369:. 335:. 256:. 220:. 138:: 106:. 42:5 20:)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index