Knowledge

Talk:Politburo Standing Committee of the Chinese Communist Party

Source 📝

439:), and for not contributing to a broad understanding of the Politboro. Perhaps the comparison to the U.S. Federal Government was not that wise, because the Wikileaks material is generally agreed upon to be valuable primary source material on U.S. foreign policy, but only because of the nature of the leaks and their source. We would definitely not base a whole article on German or Italian foreign policy based on U.S. diplomatic correspondence, because of how obviously skewed it would make the article. I see why PCPP makes the comparison, though; it's because the U.S. Federal Government article, no matter how poorly sourced, presents a very basic structure with good historical perspective, without dedicating a huge portion to recent polemics, even though there's no dearth of controversy about the U.S. Federal Government. Because of our demographics as an encyclopedia, we might have a harder time applying the same level-headedness to articles about the fearful and exotic Orient, but the relevant guidelines provide a clear imperative: the gossip must go. 95: 507:
this article is probably due more to apathy and systemic bias than an airtight information blockade. I recognize that when many articles start out as stubby things, they disproportionally cover recent scandals, which are siphoned off as more content is added, which with any luck will also happen to this article. Understand, though, that this incident is really peripheral to the subject and the function of the Politboro, and its long coverage is an unsightly sore that symbolizes editors' parochialism so long as it remains.
85: 64: 1086: 1004: 190: 169: 200: 33: 819:
important things that we DO know. In my opinion, idle speculation of a tangential nature is just that. The absence of more useful information does not elevate it to the point where is should be included in this article (but I haven't actually deleted it. I have deleted some items that were probably inserted 8-9 years ago when they were fresh and relevant.)
407:
American embassy officials. There seems to be the misconception that these "leaks" are coming from the countries concerned, when in fact, they are leaked correspondence between American embassies and home base. As such, they reflect the biases, the prejudices, and the gullibility of American officials abroad.
697:
I was referring to Arilang's comparison of "these people" to his portrayal of Ferdinand Marcos as corrupt, despotic, and nepotistic. But if you can find solid evidentiary material on which the cable allegations may stand (and not just about Aurora, which is a speck in the broad accusations), it would
618:
As Philippine president and strongman, his greatest achievement was in the fields of infrastructure development and international diplomacy. However, his administration was marred by massive authoritarian corruption, despotism, nepotism, political repression, and human rights violations. He benefited
421:
stories such as the Google break-in. Obviously, computer crimes are not a major or official function of the Politboro, and it hasn't even been established for sure that the Politboro had a part in the incident(s). It has definitely not risen to the level of "controversy" because there are no facts to
294:
I think the comment about Deng undermining CCP power and overriding the majority of the PSC should be erased- according to the Tiananmen Papers, the vote was split evenly and 1 member (Qiao Shi) abstained. Moreover, there is no material evidence at all that the party is or was weaker because of 1989.
1183:
The table under "Current members (in order)" gives Xi Jinping's birthplace as Fuping, Shaanxi. This is his father's birthplace, and thus considered Xi Jinping's home town, but it is not his own birthplace. He was born in Beijing where his father was serving in the central government. I would correct
916:
In December, Securities Market Weekly, a publication that claims a circulation of more than 5 million copies, ran into trouble with Chinese censorship for attacking the role of Li Xiaopeng, Li Peng's younger son, who is chairman of the nation's largest independent electricity producer, Huaneng Power
479:
we really know about the Politburo? Names of officials? That's about it. It may be the case that the Chinese government has hired operatives to infiltrate Knowledge, for the purpose of whitewashing computer hacking, or covering up wrongdoing. But what Knowledge is all about is -- exposing the truth.
461:
I respectfully disagree with your thinking. The Wikileaks material is not mere "gossip" but revelations which are generally kept away from the general public. It reflects what US diplomats really think -- they think the Politburo is behind a coordinated campaign of computer sabotage. And that's what
818:
Add another vote for not including this. Its not that it is unimportant, but in the context of the PSC it is of trivial importance. Part of the difficulty here is that we know so very little about the actual activities of the PSC, that the idle leaked speculation of a US diplomat is one of the most
762:
The main problem with the controversies section is that the controversies are simply not relevant to the page. They are allegations against individual members of the Politburo, and should be included in articles on individual members, not here. This article should focus on the role of the Politburo
583:
The title of this article:Politburo Standing Committee of the Communist Party of China, OK, we all know that this committee is CHINA, because the top Chinese leaders are the committee members. But these people are Human Beings, just like any other mortals, they have ambition, greed, so occasionary,
506:
We know a lot more about the Politboro than the names as you say, and there are much better sources out there that can paint a more complete picture of the Politboro, and Knowledge has satisfactory articles on many secret societies and opaque new religious movements. The relative lack of content in
406:
It is absolutely up to us as contributors to judge whether material is speculation or fact. Good newspapers do some of it for us, telling us that for example the information about Wen Jiabao's wife's supposed influence in the diamond industry comes from an anonymous "Chinese source" that reports to
314:
I do not know if it is necessary and unbiased to include "is a committee whose membership varies between 5 and 9 people, usually men". To be fair, the committee indeed have had only male members. Yet I don't see "usually men" in the description of US presidency, which have had more members in its
1163:
Since 1956, the PBSC has had an average of 6.9 members, so going back from 9 to 7 (assumption) isn’t unusual. The average share of newcomers at each Party Congress (not including interim appointments) is 54.8%, with the highest (88.9%) in 2002 and the lowest (28.6%) in 1997. Hu Jintao has been
474:
or wild speculation. And to devote two or three lines about this subject in an article about the Politburo -- which is essentially a secret hidden-from-view government -- I think is perfectly reasonable. To remove this material, in my view, is censorship. What else
1255:
The Politburo meets in Huairentang Hall in the Zhongnanhai compound of Beijing. The area is not open to the general public. I do not think that Politburo members are very amiable to the idea of impromptu photo-ops with anyone. Approach them in public at your own
298:
The Chinese abbreviation in the summery (“abbreviated simplified Chinese: 政治局常委”) is not precise. The word used actually refers to members of the committee, not the committee itself. Sources(in Chinese) includes politics.people.com.cn/GB/1024/9636072.html,
387:
article makes much sense here -- I think neither the US nor the China article is well sourced, and both articles could use huge improvement, and I recommend adding Wikileaks material to the US govt article too, particularly regarding foreign policy
1219:
I am thinking about visiting China in the future and I was wondering where the Committee holds its meetings. Is this building accessible to the public? Is it possible to meet Politburo members, perhaps to get a photo opportunity with them?
335:(This comment pasted from my talk page to here by me, Tomwsulcer:) Hi, I'm not suggesting for the complete removal of the Wikileaks material, but I believe that it would be better placed on other articles regarding Chinese hacking such as 369:
have printed the material, making it highly notable, and specifically mentioning the Chinese Politburo as orchestrating a worldwide campaign of computer sabotage, hacking into computers and systems of private companies such as
1477:
For example in Finland the health minister Anna-Kaisa Pekonen only has a "Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)" education. I would suspect the health minister of China (if they have such a minister) has a much higher education?
378:
as reported by prominent newspapers; and one of the things the Politburo does (apparently, according to NY Times, etc) is hack into computers worldwide. I think this material belongs here as well as other places such as
919:
Although corruption charges have surrounded the Li family for years, this time the Communist Party leadership proved particularly sensitive to allegations from the public about high-profile malfeasance and nepotism.
416:
If the purpose of the article is to "introduce the functions of the PRC Politboro", then it is the function of newspapers rather than encyclopedias to dedicate such a large chunk of the article to such prurient and
362:
Generally I think the Wikileaks material is important, and it's not for us as contributors to judge whether it deserves to be treated as merely "speculation" or as solid fact. Top well-respected sources such as the
846:
Zhang Beili(wife of Wen Jiabao) Senior Gemmologist Certificated Gemmologist of China Certificated Gemmologist of Gemmological Association of Great Britain Jewellry Appraiser of Appraiser Society of America
1112:; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so. 1030:; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so. 1455: 1540: 1280: 1544: 1257: 946:
The most damaged is probably Li Peng, the conservative head of Parliament, who has close ties to the State Power Company. Two of his children have made fortunes as executives in the industry.
462:
we should say: that US diplomats believe the Politburo is behind a campaign of computer hacking. That there's evidence from other sources, and an article devoted to this whole subject, namely
1902: 299:
news.xinhuanet.com/newscenter/2008-05/13/content_8155498.htm, in which the committee is correctly referred in its Chinese abbreviation("政治局常委会"). I have already made the minor correction.
948:
The former head of the Water Resources Ministry, who resigned last year after it was learned he had used government money to build an office building here, was also a protégé of Mr. Li.
667:
but legitimate public information. Public officials need to be held accountable for what they do. If they organize worldwide campaigns of computer hacking, then this should be exposed.--
1474:
I suspect that they usually have a higher university education than most leaders in European union countries, but Knowledge didn't much help finding out do I remember correctly.
374:
as well as governments such as the US government. If the purpose of this article is to "introduce the functions of the PRC Politburo", clearly readers would want to know what it
1558: 1852: 1562: 1775: 1397: 315:
history then the communist committee. I also cannot see the point of adding some unnecessary exoneration of this sort randomly in the pages related to communist countries.
1862: 1897: 141: 1842: 1812:
Just for fun, submit your predictions for membership on the 20th Politburo Standing Committee. Maximum 7 names. Competition closes Midnight GMT October 15, 2022.
1576:
other pages with the previous naming scheme, but I do not know how to automate adding all of them en masse to this request. Hence could someone please help out -
1328: 1324: 1310: 1296: 1917: 246: 343:. I believe the purpose of the article is to introduce the functions of the PRC Politburo based on established facts, not speculation; the article on the 256: 1824: 1631:
article has already caused a mess. People doing mass renames of references across articles have made an absolute mess on multiple articles, visible at
1549: 285:
Now that the full historical list of PSC members has been added, does anyone feel qualified enough to add some comments about the "Four Generations"?
778:
I've removed the section for now, but I would not oppose that another user move it into articles on individual Politburo members, where it belongs.--
1553: 1463: 553:. I don't think it's the whole story, but it deserves some coverage -- one or two lines. But you're trying to remove them, even when the article is 339:. Furthermore, the leaked documents largely contain speculation by US diplomats, and it's not actually leaked by China, which I feel might violate 1922: 1892: 384: 344: 151: 278:
The current photo doesn't show all 9 PSC members. Do you have the one where they were first introduced at the party congress in November? --
1185: 222: 1513:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
1912: 1907: 1200: 800: 782: 768: 1459: 1244: 820: 1423: 1261: 1306:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
1878: 1802: 1787: 1740: 1703: 1678: 1661: 1644: 1622: 1599: 1530: 1490: 1438: 1409: 1376: 1265: 1248: 1208: 1193: 1173: 1149: 1067: 989: 828: 809: 791: 745: 707: 676: 646: 604: 566: 516: 489: 448: 397: 356: 324: 308: 289: 1145: 1063: 117: 17: 931: 1640: 1132: 1092: 1050: 1010: 213: 174: 797: 779: 1797:
Xi has recently been elected in Guangxi, so probably change it? Also, how do I edit it if I were to edit the thing myself? (
1848: 1297:
https://web.archive.org/web/20130210034750/http://www.chinafile.com/china%E2%80%99s-next-leaders-guide-what%E2%80%99s-stake
1753:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
967: 923: 621: 1635:
for example, on even tangentially related party departments. If the rest are to be renamed, please do it more carefully.
1390: 942: 912: 614: 1874: 1783: 1569: 1434: 1405: 1371: 44: 1858: 1141: 1059: 108: 69: 1768: 1636: 1300: 116:
related articles on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1674: 1504: 1327:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
1838: 1834:
The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion:
1657: 1189: 1764:
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
1870: 1779: 1628: 1596: 1527: 1430: 1401: 1362: 1288: 1240: 1204: 824: 1284: 1131:
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant
1049:
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant
320: 304: 736:. It's an encyclopedia. We base our stuff on secondary sources like the NY Times, Washington Post, etc.-- 1733: 1514: 1346:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
1334: 985: 796:
Also, the cyberwarfare involvement, which should belong, has been moved to a more appropriate section.--
600: 50: 1287:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit 1236: 1164:
elected to the PBSC four times, the largest number of times since Mao Zedong and Zhou Enlai (5 each).
1691: 1687: 1670: 1652:
Following the comments above, I do think that it should be renamed, but caution should be exercised.
1618: 1610: 1451: 1232: 741: 737: 672: 668: 562: 558: 546: 542: 485: 481: 393: 389: 316: 300: 32: 1798: 1653: 1517:
after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
633:
Making slanderous accusations against living human beings on Knowledge based on rumors and gossip,
418: 221:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1820: 1482: 1169: 1331:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
1815:
My guess: Xi Jinping, Zhao Leji, Wang Huning, Ding Xuexiang, Hu Chunhua, Cai Qi, Guo Shengkun.
1419:
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
1347: 1096: 1014: 703: 642: 512: 444: 84: 63: 1711:
per above arguments. Seems like a better fit, in English we always refer to them as the CCP.
932:
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/01/28/world/details-of-corruption-emerge-in-china.html?ref=lipeng
854:
Director of National Gems and Jewelry Technology-Administrative Centre of MLR of P. R. China-
1713: 1699: 1486: 978: 593: 585: 463: 380: 336: 205: 1354: 1614: 435:, not well-sourced (and that regardless of the stature of the publication that reports on 432: 340: 937:
Details of Corruption Emerge in China By ELISABETH ROSENTHAL Published: January 28, 2001
1386:
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
1313:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by 1117: 1035: 963:
the practice of the party is to cover up for its top leaders for the sake of stability.
883:
3. President of Gemstone Identifying Special Committee, Geological Association of China
365: 352: 1353:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
1886: 1830:
Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion
1816: 1760:
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
1578: 1165: 1124: 1042: 634: 286: 663:
When newspapers print material to expose the misdeeds of public officials, it isn't
699: 638: 508: 440: 100: 886:
4. Vice Director of Identification Committee of Certificated Gemmologist of China
1695: 1429:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —
1320: 1301:
http://www.chinafile.com/china%E2%80%99s-next-leaders-guide-what%E2%80%99s-stake
772: 764: 1869:
Participate in the deletion discussions at the nomination pages linked above. —
763:
as a governing body, and not on the members currently part of it. For example,
1632: 1319:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than 1085: 1003: 771:
article, even though there were allegations that the previous Vice President,
279: 195: 90: 1444:"Party Secretary of the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress" 1120:
then you may need to upload it to Knowledge (Commons does not allow fair use)
1038:
then you may need to upload it to Knowledge (Commons does not allow fair use)
889:
5. Chinese Representative of International Colored Gemstone Association (ICA)
1138:
This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image
1056:
This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image
903: 840: 348: 218: 480:
And this is a well-sourced relevant story which pertains to this topic.--
961:
But the official doubted that they would be publicly disgraced, because
892:
6. Chinese Representative of International Gemmological Conference (IGC)
199: 189: 168: 1415:
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion
467: 371: 619:
from a large personality cult in the Philippines during his regime.
383:
as you suggest. Last, I don't see how comparing this article to the
880:
2. Vice President of Gemstone Identifying Special Committee of GAC
732:
Solid evidentiary evidence? This isn't a court of law. This isn't
113: 18:
Talk:Politburo Standing Committee of the Communist Party of China
1627:
On a sidenote, the implementation of the original rename on the
1382:
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion
331:
Wikilinks documents regarding the Politburo and computer hacking
1184:
this but it's some sort of a template and I can't work out how.
470:, and confirmed in news reports, confirms that this isn't mere 1448:
Li Zhanshu is Chairman of the NPC SC, not "Party Secretary."
939: 909: 611: 584:
they have their cronies to make some money along the way like
26: 1541:
Politburo Standing Committee of the Communist Party of China
1281:
Politburo Standing Committee of the Communist Party of China
549:) 04:19, 6 January 2011 (UTC) Further, I disagree that it's 537:
If we know so much about the Politburo, why is this article
1545:
Politburo Standing Committee of the Chinese Communist Party
877:
1. Vice President of Gemological Association of China (GAC)
1291:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
1570:
Talk:Chinese_Communist_Party#Requested_move_16_July_2020
906:
The princelings and the protesters By Antoaneta Bezlova
1573: 1572:
there should be consistency throughout. There are over
1223:
Any information on this would be greatly appreciated.
895:
7. Fellow of Gemmological Association of Great Britain
1215:
Where does the PRC Politburo Standing Committee meet?
1077:
File:Li Keqiang Macau2011 .jpg Nominated for Deletion
995:
File:Xi Jinping Macau 2009.jpg Nominated for Deletion
955:
a former official said, adding that the scandals had
1559:
Publicity Department of the Communist Party of China
217:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 112:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 1563:
Publicity Department of the Chinese Communist Party
1323:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors 1123:If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no 1041:If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no 1903:C-Class China-related articles of High-importance 957:further clipped the wings of Li and his family. 1774:Participate in the deletion discussion at the 1396:Participate in the deletion discussion at the 1309:This message was posted before February 2018. 1470:What is the education of the current members? 1179:Xi Jinping birthplace is Beijing, NOT Shaanxi 863:Director of National Gemstone Training Center 347:does not contain Wikileaks material at all.-- 8: 860:Director of Beijing Gemstone Testing Station 857:Director of National Gemstone Testing Center 1133:image page (File:Li Keqiang Macau2011 .jpg) 1051:image page (File:Xi Jinping Macau 2009.jpg) 953:has been losing his protégés for some time, 1503:The following is a closed discussion of a 1449: 1279:I have just modified one external link on 1230: 163: 58: 1550:Politburo of the Communist Party of China 904:http://www.atimes.com/china/DA19Ad02.html 841:http://www.dac.gov.cn/diamond/guwen05.htm 1554:Politburo of the Chinese Communist Party 1456:2001:4C4E:2495:4200:A501:CA9C:4F77:E844 165: 60: 30: 1898:High-importance China-related articles 1258:2601:602:680:5BAD:AC4B:73BF:1065:5568 1095:, has been nominated for deletion at 1013:, has been nominated for deletion at 7: 1522:The result of the move request was: 866:President of Jewelry Fashion Journal 211:This article is within the scope of 106:This article is within the scope of 1127:then it cannot be uploaded or used. 1045:then it cannot be uploaded or used. 769:Vice President of the United States 49:It is of interest to the following 1918:High-importance socialism articles 25: 1807: 1749:The discussion above is closed. 1283:. Please take a moment to review 1084: 1002: 734:guilty beyond a reasonable doubt 198: 188: 167: 93: 83: 62: 31: 1091:An image used in this article, 1009:An image used in this article, 251:This article has been rated as 231:Knowledge:WikiProject Socialism 146:This article has been rated as 1923:WikiProject Socialism articles 1893:C-Class China-related articles 1825:19:14, 14 September 2022 (UTC) 1443: 1174:02:36, 12 September 2012 (UTC) 1093:File:Li Keqiang Macau2011 .jpg 1011:File:Xi Jinping Macau 2009.jpg 234:Template:WikiProject Socialism 1: 1788:11:23, 19 November 2021 (UTC) 1531:04:53, 4 September 2020 (UTC) 1266:23:47, 29 November 2017 (UTC) 1209:22:55, 17 November 2012 (UTC) 1194:00:52, 17 November 2012 (UTC) 431:So remove the information as 325:02:44, 31 December 2009 (UTC) 309:02:44, 31 December 2009 (UTC) 225:and see a list of open tasks. 120:and see a list of open tasks. 1879:10:07, 23 October 2022 (UTC) 1496:Requested move 7 August 2020 1424:Zhao Leji official image.jpg 1377:20:36, 6 December 2017 (UTC) 1249:06:48, 12 January 2017 (UTC) 1159:Interesting perspective (OR) 1101:Deletion requests March 2012 1019:Deletion requests March 2012 869:Vice president of CHINA GEMS 810:22:37, 14 January 2011 (UTC) 792:22:21, 14 January 2011 (UTC) 698:greatly help your argument. 1741:04:59, 31 August 2020 (UTC) 1704:15:26, 28 August 2020 (UTC) 1679:00:17, 21 August 2020 (UTC) 1662:18:57, 20 August 2020 (UTC) 1645:17:06, 15 August 2020 (UTC) 1623:21:58, 14 August 2020 (UTC) 1600:12:45, 14 August 2020 (UTC) 1568:– As per the discussion at 1099:in the following category: 1017:in the following category: 990:03:38, 6 January 2011 (UTC) 829:12:08, 2 October 2011 (UTC) 775:, had links to the company. 746:04:19, 6 January 2011 (UTC) 708:04:04, 6 January 2011 (UTC) 677:03:50, 6 January 2011 (UTC) 647:03:17, 6 January 2011 (UTC) 605:03:14, 6 January 2011 (UTC) 567:04:21, 6 January 2011 (UTC) 517:03:53, 6 January 2011 (UTC) 490:03:36, 6 January 2011 (UTC) 449:02:37, 6 January 2011 (UTC) 398:14:56, 4 January 2011 (UTC) 357:09:59, 4 January 2011 (UTC) 126:Knowledge:WikiProject China 1939: 1913:C-Class socialism articles 1908:WikiProject China articles 1803:19:04, 27 April 2022 (UTC) 1587:10:06, 7 August 2020 (UTC) 1340:(last update: 5 June 2024) 1276:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 588:did, there is no big deal. 257:project's importance scale 152:project's importance scale 129:Template:WikiProject China 1491:15:19, 13 June 2020 (UTC) 1439:23:07, 10 June 2019 (UTC) 1410:12:07, 2 March 2019 (UTC) 1150:11:01, 9 March 2012 (UTC) 1068:11:00, 9 March 2012 (UTC) 282:17:37, 16 Oct 2003 (UTC) 250: 183: 145: 78: 57: 1751:Please do not modify it. 1510:Please do not modify it. 290:07:34, 25 May 2004 (UTC) 1849:Wang Huning en 2022.png 1808:Who's on the next PBSC? 1613:with the main article. 1464:14:31, 5 May 2020 (UTC) 1272:External links modified 767:isn't mentioned in the 1629:Chines Community Party 1391:Zhao Leji Portrait.jpg 1142:CommonsNotificationBot 1060:CommonsNotificationBot 665:slanderous accusations 466:, such as comments by 132:China-related articles 39:This article is rated 1859:Zhao Leji en 2022.png 1637:ProcrastinatingReader 385:US federal government 345:US federal government 214:WikiProject Socialism 1321:regular verification 1311:After February 2018 850:Current Position: 835:Rumors and gossips? 555:really really short 1871:Community Tech bot 1780:Community Tech bot 1694:of the main page. 1431:Community Tech bot 1402:Community Tech bot 1365:InternetArchiveBot 1316:InternetArchiveBot 1125:fair use rationale 1043:fair use rationale 873:Social Pluralism: 237:socialism articles 45:content assessment 1839:Li Xi en 2022.png 1738: 1669:for consistency. 1602: 1584: 1466: 1454:comment added by 1341: 1251: 1235:comment added by 1156: 1155: 1105:What should I do? 1097:Wikimedia Commons 1074: 1073: 1023:What should I do? 1015:Wikimedia Commons 984: 972: 971: 928: 927: 626: 625: 599: 557:to begin with. -- 271: 270: 267: 266: 263: 262: 162: 161: 158: 157: 109:WikiProject China 16:(Redirected from 1930: 1739: 1732: 1730: 1728: 1588: 1582: 1512: 1375: 1366: 1339: 1338: 1317: 1116:If the image is 1088: 1081: 1080: 1034:If the image is 1006: 999: 998: 983: 981: 976: 940: 910: 807: 789: 612: 598: 596: 591: 586:Ferdinand Marcos 464:Operation Aurora 422:be argued about. 381:Operation Aurora 337:Operation Aurora 239: 238: 235: 232: 229: 208: 206:Socialism portal 203: 202: 192: 185: 184: 179: 171: 164: 134: 133: 130: 127: 124: 103: 98: 97: 96: 87: 80: 79: 74: 66: 59: 42: 36: 35: 27: 21: 1938: 1937: 1933: 1932: 1931: 1929: 1928: 1927: 1883: 1882: 1832: 1810: 1795: 1793:Xi constituency 1776:nomination page 1762: 1757: 1736: 1731: 1726: 1722: 1718: 1714: 1712: 1671:WhinyTheYounger 1595:—usernamekiran 1581: 1526:—usernamekiran 1508: 1498: 1472: 1446: 1417: 1398:nomination page 1384: 1369: 1364: 1332: 1325:have permission 1315: 1289:this simple FaQ 1274: 1217: 1181: 1161: 1079: 997: 979: 977: 917:International. 837: 801: 783: 594: 592: 333: 276: 253:High-importance 236: 233: 230: 227: 226: 204: 197: 178:High‑importance 177: 148:High-importance 131: 128: 125: 122: 121: 99: 94: 92: 73:High‑importance 72: 43:on Knowledge's 40: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 1936: 1934: 1926: 1925: 1920: 1915: 1910: 1905: 1900: 1895: 1885: 1884: 1867: 1866: 1856: 1846: 1831: 1828: 1809: 1806: 1794: 1791: 1772: 1771: 1761: 1758: 1756: 1755: 1745: 1744: 1743: 1734: 1724: 1720: 1716: 1706: 1681: 1664: 1654:DoggieTimesTwo 1647: 1625: 1579: 1566: 1565: 1556: 1547: 1536: 1534: 1520: 1519: 1505:requested move 1499: 1497: 1494: 1471: 1468: 1445: 1442: 1427: 1426: 1416: 1413: 1394: 1393: 1383: 1380: 1359: 1358: 1351: 1304: 1303: 1295:Added archive 1273: 1270: 1269: 1268: 1216: 1213: 1212: 1211: 1186:188.223.127.29 1180: 1177: 1160: 1157: 1154: 1153: 1129: 1128: 1121: 1107: 1106: 1089: 1078: 1075: 1072: 1071: 1047: 1046: 1039: 1025: 1024: 1007: 996: 993: 970: 969: 966: 944: 935: 934: 926: 925: 922: 914: 908: 907: 899: 897: 896: 893: 890: 887: 884: 881: 878: 871: 870: 867: 864: 861: 858: 855: 844: 843: 836: 833: 832: 831: 815: 814: 813: 812: 776: 759: 758: 757: 756: 755: 754: 753: 752: 751: 750: 749: 748: 719: 718: 717: 716: 715: 714: 713: 712: 711: 710: 686: 685: 684: 683: 682: 681: 680: 679: 654: 653: 652: 651: 650: 649: 624: 623: 620: 616: 610: 609: 608: 607: 578: 577: 576: 575: 574: 573: 572: 571: 570: 569: 526: 525: 524: 523: 522: 521: 520: 519: 497: 496: 495: 494: 493: 492: 454: 453: 452: 451: 426: 425: 424: 423: 411: 410: 409: 408: 401: 400: 366:New York Times 332: 329: 275: 272: 269: 268: 265: 264: 261: 260: 249: 243: 242: 240: 223:the discussion 210: 209: 193: 181: 180: 172: 160: 159: 156: 155: 144: 138: 137: 135: 118:the discussion 105: 104: 88: 76: 75: 67: 55: 54: 48: 37: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1935: 1924: 1921: 1919: 1916: 1914: 1911: 1909: 1906: 1904: 1901: 1899: 1896: 1894: 1891: 1890: 1888: 1881: 1880: 1876: 1872: 1864: 1860: 1857: 1854: 1850: 1847: 1844: 1840: 1837: 1836: 1835: 1829: 1827: 1826: 1822: 1818: 1813: 1805: 1804: 1800: 1792: 1790: 1789: 1785: 1781: 1777: 1770: 1767: 1766: 1765: 1759: 1754: 1752: 1747: 1746: 1742: 1737: 1729: 1727: 1710: 1707: 1705: 1701: 1697: 1693: 1692:WP:COMMONNAME 1689: 1688:WP:CONSISTENT 1685: 1682: 1680: 1676: 1672: 1668: 1665: 1663: 1659: 1655: 1651: 1648: 1646: 1642: 1638: 1634: 1630: 1626: 1624: 1620: 1616: 1612: 1611:WP:CONSISTENT 1608: 1605: 1604: 1603: 1601: 1598: 1594: 1593: 1586: 1585: 1575: 1571: 1564: 1560: 1557: 1555: 1551: 1548: 1546: 1542: 1539: 1538: 1537: 1533: 1532: 1529: 1525: 1518: 1516: 1511: 1506: 1501: 1500: 1495: 1493: 1492: 1488: 1484: 1479: 1475: 1469: 1467: 1465: 1461: 1457: 1453: 1441: 1440: 1436: 1432: 1425: 1422: 1421: 1420: 1414: 1412: 1411: 1407: 1403: 1399: 1392: 1389: 1388: 1387: 1381: 1379: 1378: 1373: 1368: 1367: 1356: 1352: 1349: 1345: 1344: 1343: 1336: 1330: 1326: 1322: 1318: 1312: 1307: 1302: 1298: 1294: 1293: 1292: 1290: 1286: 1282: 1277: 1271: 1267: 1263: 1259: 1254: 1253: 1252: 1250: 1246: 1242: 1238: 1234: 1227: 1224: 1221: 1214: 1210: 1206: 1202: 1201:92.41.251.205 1198: 1197: 1196: 1195: 1191: 1187: 1178: 1176: 1175: 1171: 1167: 1158: 1152: 1151: 1147: 1143: 1139: 1135: 1134: 1126: 1122: 1119: 1115: 1114: 1113: 1111: 1104: 1103: 1102: 1098: 1094: 1090: 1087: 1083: 1082: 1076: 1070: 1069: 1065: 1061: 1057: 1053: 1052: 1044: 1040: 1037: 1033: 1032: 1031: 1029: 1022: 1021: 1020: 1016: 1012: 1008: 1005: 1001: 1000: 994: 992: 991: 988: 987: 986: 982: 965: 964: 959: 958: 954: 949: 945: 941: 938: 933: 930: 929: 921: 915: 911: 905: 902: 901: 900: 894: 891: 888: 885: 882: 879: 876: 875: 874: 868: 865: 862: 859: 856: 853: 852: 851: 848: 842: 839: 838: 834: 830: 826: 822: 817: 816: 811: 808: 805: 799: 795: 794: 793: 790: 787: 781: 777: 774: 770: 766: 761: 760: 747: 743: 739: 735: 731: 730: 729: 728: 727: 726: 725: 724: 723: 722: 721: 720: 709: 705: 701: 696: 695: 694: 693: 692: 691: 690: 689: 688: 687: 678: 674: 670: 666: 662: 661: 660: 659: 658: 657: 656: 655: 648: 644: 640: 636: 632: 631: 630: 629: 628: 627: 617: 613: 606: 603: 602: 601: 597: 587: 582: 581: 580: 579: 568: 564: 560: 556: 552: 548: 544: 540: 536: 535: 534: 533: 532: 531: 530: 529: 528: 527: 518: 514: 510: 505: 504: 503: 502: 501: 500: 499: 498: 491: 487: 483: 478: 473: 469: 465: 460: 459: 458: 457: 456: 455: 450: 446: 442: 438: 434: 430: 429: 428: 427: 420: 415: 414: 413: 412: 405: 404: 403: 402: 399: 395: 391: 386: 382: 377: 373: 368: 367: 361: 360: 359: 358: 354: 350: 346: 342: 338: 330: 328: 326: 322: 318: 312: 310: 306: 302: 296: 292: 291: 288: 283: 281: 273: 258: 254: 248: 245: 244: 241: 224: 220: 216: 215: 207: 201: 196: 194: 191: 187: 186: 182: 176: 173: 170: 166: 153: 149: 143: 140: 139: 136: 119: 115: 111: 110: 102: 91: 89: 86: 82: 81: 77: 71: 68: 65: 61: 56: 52: 46: 38: 34: 29: 28: 19: 1868: 1833: 1814: 1811: 1796: 1773: 1763: 1750: 1748: 1715: 1708: 1683: 1666: 1649: 1606: 1591: 1590: 1577: 1567: 1535: 1523: 1521: 1509: 1502: 1480: 1476: 1473: 1450:— Preceding 1447: 1428: 1418: 1395: 1385: 1363: 1360: 1335:source check 1314: 1308: 1305: 1278: 1275: 1237:RangedRecoil 1231:— Preceding 1228: 1225: 1222: 1218: 1182: 1162: 1137: 1136: 1130: 1109: 1108: 1100: 1055: 1054: 1048: 1027: 1026: 1018: 975: 974: 973: 962: 960: 956: 952: 950: 947: 936: 918: 898: 872: 849: 845: 821:50.14.78.218 803: 785: 733: 664: 590: 589: 554: 550: 538: 476: 471: 436: 375: 364: 334: 313: 297: 293: 284: 277: 252: 212: 147: 107: 101:China portal 51:WikiProjects 1515:move review 1226:Thank you. 1110:Don't panic 1028:Don't panic 773:Dick Cheney 765:Halliburton 635:no big deal 437:speculation 1887:Categories 1863:discussion 1853:discussion 1843:discussion 1633:Xi Jinping 1615:Rreagan007 1592:Relisting. 1372:Report bug 738:Tomwsulcer 669:Tomwsulcer 559:Tomwsulcer 551:peripheral 543:Tomwsulcer 482:Tomwsulcer 390:Tomwsulcer 317:95139ieaci 301:95139ieaci 1355:this tool 1348:this tool 980:Arilang 595:Arilang 419:recentist 388:issues.-- 228:Socialism 219:socialism 175:Socialism 1817:DOR (HK) 1452:unsigned 1361:Cheers.— 1245:contribs 1233:unsigned 1166:DOR (HK) 1118:non-free 1036:non-free 539:so short 341:WP:UNDUE 287:Shannonr 274:Untitled 1769:赵乐际.jpg 1723:urelius 1709:Support 1684:Support 1667:Support 1650:Support 1607:Support 1583:HAMPION 1285:my edit 951:Mr. Li 700:Quigley 639:Quigley 541:?????-- 509:Quigley 441:Quigley 255:on the 150:on the 41:C-class 1696:Amigao 1609:to be 1597:(talk) 1528:(talk) 1524:moved. 1483:ee1518 1229:- RR 472:gossip 468:Google 372:Google 327:Titan 311:Titan 47:scale. 1735:Talk! 1690:with 1256:risk. 1199:Done. 433:undue 280:Jiang 123:China 114:China 70:China 1875:talk 1821:talk 1799:talk 1784:talk 1700:talk 1686:per 1675:talk 1658:talk 1641:talk 1619:talk 1487:talk 1460:talk 1435:talk 1406:talk 1262:talk 1241:talk 1205:talk 1190:talk 1170:talk 1146:talk 1064:talk 825:talk 804:talk 798:SGCM 786:talk 780:SGCM 742:talk 704:talk 673:talk 643:talk 563:talk 547:talk 513:talk 486:talk 445:talk 394:talk 376:does 353:talk 349:PCPP 321:talk 305:talk 247:High 142:High 1778:. — 1574:100 1400:. — 1329:RfC 1299:to 1889:: 1877:) 1823:) 1801:) 1786:) 1702:) 1677:) 1660:) 1643:) 1621:) 1561:→ 1552:→ 1543:→ 1507:. 1489:) 1481:-- 1462:) 1437:) 1408:) 1342:. 1337:}} 1333:{{ 1264:) 1247:) 1243:• 1207:) 1192:) 1172:) 1148:) 1140:-- 1066:) 1058:-- 968:” 943:“ 924:” 913:“ 827:) 744:) 706:) 675:) 645:) 637:! 622:” 615:“ 565:) 515:) 488:) 477:do 447:) 396:) 355:) 323:) 307:) 1873:( 1865:) 1861:( 1855:) 1851:( 1845:) 1841:( 1819:( 1782:( 1725:R 1721:A 1719:r 1717:M 1698:( 1673:( 1656:( 1639:( 1617:( 1589:— 1580:C 1485:( 1458:( 1433:( 1404:( 1374:) 1370:( 1357:. 1350:. 1260:( 1239:( 1203:( 1188:( 1168:( 1144:( 1062:( 823:( 806:) 802:( 788:) 784:( 740:( 702:( 671:( 641:( 561:( 545:( 511:( 484:( 443:( 392:( 351:( 319:( 303:( 259:. 154:. 53:: 20:)

Index

Talk:Politburo Standing Committee of the Communist Party of China

content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
China
WikiProject icon
China portal
WikiProject China
China
the discussion
High
project's importance scale
WikiProject icon
Socialism
WikiProject icon
icon
Socialism portal
WikiProject Socialism
socialism
the discussion
High
project's importance scale
Jiang
Shannonr
07:34, 25 May 2004 (UTC)
95139ieaci
talk
02:44, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
95139ieaci

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.