39:
21:
126:
of the original article failed. And although I don't really understand what the 'keep' voters envisaged would be the right way to sort this situation out (and I note that none of them has made any effort to do so), I speculate that it may be against the spirit of that outcome to not at least have
138:
I could have just left the redirect in place, but for the same reason that the renaming was necessary, it would be wrong to have a redirect for the term "population reduction" to an article about a purported conspiracy theory where no evidence has been provided that anyone other than the original
226:
The article says that one of the meanings is "a euphemism for genocide, sometimes used by perpetrators of genocide to disguise their actions". I have serious doubts that this was actually ever used as an euphemism for any historical genocide; in any case, it should be clarified and sourced.
168:
I am aware that disambig pages should generally not make contentious assertions and therefore should not require references. However, even though the term 'theory' or 'conspiracy theory' can of course be a semantically correct way of describing something that the original author
190:
I know this argument about the word 'theory' sounds a bit weird, but think about it. I would argue that 'concept', 'idea', 'ideology', 'invention' and 'religion' all share the same property of having impicit connotations of notability when used unqualified in an encyclopedia.
176:, in my opinion calling something a 'theory' or 'conspiracy theory' without qualification, in an encyclopedia, genuinely implies a degree of notability to the average reader. So a reference
123:
187:" in the disambig page at all then? Well, I explained my reasoning for doing so above. In short I am trying to make the best of a slightly bad situation.
165:, I am not personally going to make any 'counter-edits' or anything, but I thought I should explain my reasoning, and maybe someone might agree with me.
250:
65:
61:
46:
26:
228:
119:). So in this case I have created this disambiguation page - and my suggestion is for it to remain here for a while at least.
115:
for example. Unfortunately the latter term was actually used as the title of an article (one which I have just moved to
206:
I completely agree with you, the claimed "theory" needs a reference or should be removed from this disambig page.--
184:
116:
211:
51:
232:
99:
Hello. I generally do not think there should be disambiguation pages for generic two-word terms, such as
207:
170:
196:
173:
147:
244:
192:
143:
236:
215:
200:
151:
38:
20:
135:
way to get from here to the article that was saved from deletion.
180:
required at the position that I suggested, to assert notability.
161:
In response to the removal of the "citation needed" tag by
162:
56:
64:, where you can join the project or contribute to the
139:
author refers to the purported theory by that name.
54:pages on Knowledge. If you wish to help, you can
44:This disambiguation page is within the scope of
8:
122:The background to the situation is that my
50:, an attempt to structure and organize all
15:
60:attached to this talk page, or visit the
17:
7:
131:residing at this page, and at least
74:Knowledge:WikiProject Disambiguation
77:Template:WikiProject Disambiguation
14:
251:WikiProject Disambiguation pages
37:
19:
183:Or should I not have included "
1:
185:Population reduction theory
117:Population reduction theory
267:
142:I hope that makes sense.
47:WikiProject Disambiguation
237:10:08, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
216:15:31, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
32:
201:23:50, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
152:22:49, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
109:organization management
80:Disambiguation articles
222:Euphemism for genocide
113:population reduction
157:Citation was needed
124:suggested deletion
92:
91:
88:
87:
258:
82:
81:
78:
75:
72:
59:
41:
34:
33:
23:
16:
266:
265:
261:
260:
259:
257:
256:
255:
241:
240:
224:
159:
101:energy increase
97:
79:
76:
73:
70:
69:
55:
12:
11:
5:
264:
262:
254:
253:
243:
242:
223:
220:
219:
218:
208:Roentgenium111
158:
155:
105:budget control
96:
93:
90:
89:
86:
85:
83:
71:Disambiguation
52:disambiguation
42:
30:
29:
27:Disambiguation
24:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
263:
252:
249:
248:
246:
239:
238:
234:
230:
229:94.241.95.133
221:
217:
213:
209:
205:
204:
203:
202:
198:
194:
188:
186:
181:
179:
175:
172:
166:
164:
156:
154:
153:
149:
145:
140:
136:
134:
130:
125:
120:
118:
114:
110:
106:
102:
94:
84:
67:
63:
58:
57:edit the page
53:
49:
48:
43:
40:
36:
35:
31:
28:
25:
22:
18:
225:
189:
182:
177:
167:
160:
141:
137:
132:
128:
121:
112:
108:
104:
100:
98:
62:project page
45:
171:synthesized
66:discussion
163:this edit
129:something
245:Category
95:Untitled
174:one day
193:Open4D
144:Open4D
111:, or
233:talk
212:talk
197:talk
148:talk
133:some
247::
235:)
214:)
199:)
178:is
150:)
107:,
103:,
231:(
210:(
195:(
146:(
68:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
