Knowledge

Talk:Paulo Francis/GA4

Source 📝

567:, since the "LoCE request" template on the talk page hasn't attracted a copyedit in over three years (I've now removed it, per GOCE instructions). Once that's done I think the nominator should then request a peer review, since the copyedit doesn't deal with all of the criteria you've identified as unsatisfied. This article should not be nominated again before both copyedit and peer review are completed and acted on. 392: 369: 349: 257: 221: 477: 457: 417: 324: 308: 288: 497: 527:
journalism and criticism work and the discussion of his fiction writing was so thick that I could barely read or understand it. As stated in the previous review, selected works are inherently non-neutral and a form of cherry-picking. I think this article is in severe need of a peer review and copy edit, as well as a massive trim to its prose size.
42: 526:
diversion into his political opinions. I mean, he is notable for his writing, right? I mean, the lead lists him as "a Brazilian journalist, political pundit, novelist and critic." Yet the article overwhelmingly focuses on the intimate details of his political philosophy with only minor mention of his
538:
I think this article is a very long way from satisfying criteria 1, 3, and 4, however I'm wary of a quick fail because I don't have particularly concrete suggestions on how to improve it. I'm going to see if another editor would be willing to give the article a look over and what their opinion would
558:
specifically recommended either peer review or copyedit, and neither has been done, I don't see why this shouldn't be closed immediately. All of the warning templates added to the article after that GAN review were removed by the nominator immediately prior to nominating for this one, even thought
522:), particularly with regards to the prose. The entire article seems to lack an encyclopedic tone seeming more like a narrative in structure and in style. I feel like there is both unneccesary and possibly 302: 80: 47: 70: 447: 251: 298: 126: 122: 52: 186: 107: 156: 75: 318: 215: 99: 451: 559:
the article lede had clearly not been made longer and still did not meet the GA requirements. I have gone to the
467: 231: 211: 439: 443: 363: 274: 555: 515: 411: 343: 572: 590: 544: 171: 150: 115: 17: 568: 431: 359: 282: 239: 523: 190: 586: 560: 540: 382: 235: 167: 146: 564: 471: 247: 243: 92: 207: 594: 576: 548: 175: 160: 514:
It doesn't seem that there were any major changes since the last
585:
I agree with BlueMoonset and so am closing this as not listed.
519: 134: 103: 563:requests page to specifically request a review of 8: 466:B. Images are provided if possible and are 30: 61: 33: 7: 389:Fair representation without bias: 218:, or spelling and grammar errors: 24: 495: 475: 455: 415: 390: 367: 347: 322: 306: 286: 255: 219: 496: 1: 283:appropriate reference section 476: 456: 416: 391: 368: 348: 323: 307: 287: 256: 220: 595:19:00, 27 August 2015 (UTC) 577:22:43, 23 August 2015 (UTC) 549:02:30, 16 August 2015 (UTC) 176:01:36, 16 August 2015 (UTC) 161:01:36, 16 August 2015 (UTC) 610: 196: 448:valid fair use rationales 435:to illustrate the topic? 470:to the topic, and have 201:reasonably well written 561:Guild of Copy Editors 337:broad in its coverage 319:No original research 270:factually accurate 18:Talk:Paulo Francis 472:suitable captions 450:are provided for 89: 88: 601: 499: 498: 479: 478: 459: 458: 452:non-free content 444:copyright status 419: 418: 394: 393: 371: 370: 351: 350: 326: 325: 310: 309: 299:reliable sources 290: 289: 259: 258: 223: 222: 139: 130: 111: 43:Copyvio detector 31: 609: 608: 604: 603: 602: 600: 599: 598: 556:previous review 533: 512: 303:where necessary 234:compliance for 183: 120: 97: 91: 85: 57: 29: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 607: 605: 580: 579: 536:Second Opinion 532: 529: 511: 508: 507: 506: 505: 504: 503: 502: 494:Pass or Fail: 486: 485: 484: 483: 482: 464: 463: 462: 438:A. Images are 426: 425: 424: 423: 422: 401: 400: 399: 398: 397: 378: 377: 376: 375: 374: 356: 355: 354: 333: 332: 331: 330: 329: 315: 314: 313: 295: 294: 293: 266: 265: 264: 263: 262: 244:words to watch 228: 227: 226: 182: 179: 165: 140: 87: 86: 84: 83: 78: 73: 67: 64: 63: 59: 58: 56: 55: 53:External links 50: 45: 39: 36: 35: 28: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 606: 597: 596: 592: 588: 584: 578: 574: 570: 566: 565:Paulo Francis 562: 557: 553: 552: 551: 550: 546: 542: 537: 530: 528: 525: 521: 517: 509: 501: 500: 493: 492: 490: 487: 481: 480: 473: 469: 465: 461: 460: 453: 449: 445: 441: 437: 436: 434: 433: 427: 421: 420: 413: 409: 408: 406: 402: 396: 395: 388: 387: 385: 384: 379: 373: 372: 365: 364:summary style 361: 357: 353: 352: 345: 344:Major aspects 341: 340: 338: 334: 328: 327: 320: 316: 312: 311: 304: 300: 296: 292: 291: 284: 280: 279: 277: 276: 271: 267: 261: 260: 253: 249: 245: 241: 237: 233: 229: 225: 224: 217: 213: 209: 206:A. Prose is " 205: 204: 202: 198: 197: 195: 194: 192: 189:review – see 188: 180: 178: 177: 173: 169: 166:Will review. 163: 162: 158: 155: 152: 148: 145: 141: 138: 137: 133: 128: 124: 119: 118: 114: 109: 105: 101: 96: 95: 82: 79: 77: 74: 72: 69: 68: 66: 65: 60: 54: 51: 49: 46: 44: 41: 40: 38: 37: 32: 26: 19: 582: 581: 535: 534: 513: 488: 429: 404: 381: 336: 273: 269: 200: 193:for criteria 185: 184: 164: 153: 143: 142: 135: 131: 117:Article talk 116: 112: 93: 90: 81:Instructions 569:BlueMoonset 442:with their 214:", without 104:visual edit 583:Not listed 554:Since the 281:A. Has an 275:verifiable 48:Authorship 34:GA toolbox 587:Wugapodes 541:Wugapodes 412:edit wars 297:B. Cites 181:Checklist 168:Wugapodes 147:Wugapodes 144:Reviewer: 71:Templates 62:Reviewing 27:GA Review 510:Comments 468:relevant 430:contain 428:Does it 216:copyvios 191:WP:WIAGA 157:contribs 76:Criteria 531:Results 489:Overall 414:, etc: 383:neutral 360:Focused 248:fiction 212:concise 127:history 108:history 94:Article 516:GA nom 446:, and 440:tagged 432:images 405:stable 403:Is it 380:Is it 335:Is it 268:Is it 250:, and 240:layout 199:Is it 524:undue 362:(see 252:lists 208:clear 136:Watch 16:< 591:talk 573:talk 545:talk 539:be. 520:diff 272:and 236:lead 210:and 172:talk 151:talk 123:edit 100:edit 410:No 366:): 358:B. 342:A. 317:C. 232:MoS 230:B. 593:) 575:) 547:) 491:: 474:: 454:: 407:? 386:? 346:: 339:? 321:: 305:: 301:, 285:: 278:? 254:: 246:, 242:, 238:, 203:? 187:GA 174:) 159:) 125:| 106:| 102:| 589:( 571:( 543:( 518:( 170:( 154:· 149:( 132:· 129:) 121:( 113:· 110:) 98:(

Index

Talk:Paulo Francis
Copyvio detector
Authorship
External links
Templates
Criteria
Instructions
Article
edit
visual edit
history
Article talk
edit
history
Watch
Wugapodes
talk
contribs
01:36, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
Wugapodes
talk
01:36, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
GA
WP:WIAGA
clear
concise
copyvios
MoS
lead
layout

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.