1162:"... giving the WW2 German military any credit because they were BAD BAD Nazis..." is actually what I said. I never complained about American historians calling Nazis bad. Of course they would! My point with this statement is that the neocon wave in History touts American triumphalism looking not only forward (now at the End of History) but also backwards in actual history. Thus we have Max Boots and V.D. Hansens explaining how great we have always been militarily. Anything which disturbs this American triumphalist view must be countered somehow. So we end up with a Steven Zaloga saying with a straight face that the German Panzer commanders had high scores because the Eastern front was easier! Hah! The Nazism of the Wehrmacht takes nothing away from the fact that they were a superior military, and it took those crazy Russians to beat 'em on the ground; the biggest contribution of the Western Allies being the defeat of the Luftwaffe. As Max hastings has said (I'm paraphrasing) "...the soldiers of the Western Allies were no Panzergrenadiers..." Mr. Drmies' solution would be to just have a neutral list like in Dutch Knowledge (XXG)- I agree!
580:
about WW2 panzer aces finds out from
Knowledge (XXG) that A: They didn't really exist and B: If they did exist they were instruments of Nazi propaganda. If I'm on the internet and I look up "Panzer Ace" I would expect to find out at least who these men were and what the context was of what they did. The Knowledge (XXG) article seeks to erase history- "panzer ace" is a "contemporary" term and such men didn't really exist. This is false. There WERE German tankers who racked up high kill numbers in the context of the cooperative nature of tank warfare. The scores of these German commanders were much higher than anyone's before or after in that same context. Knowledge (XXG) now denies me a look at that list even though the numbers aren't really disputed but because of a pro-Western, neocon POV. So I ask- can we have the list back? That at least is a counterweight to the editorial part (90%) of the article.
751:"I don't give a good goddamn if you edit that article or not--you violated the BLP (on the talk page, not in the article, as far as I know) and I warned you not to do so again. Also, it's Dr. Neitzel. Again, your very first sentence just reveals the stunning depth of your ignorance. Note that I never said or implied you're a Nazi--the real Nazis are dead. You seem to be a sympathizer, which in some ways is worse cause you should know better. I'm not sure what you're implying about me (where do I come from?), and I really don't give a damn about that either, since it's neither here nor there. If your ignorance impedes your neutrality and objectivity, as it seems to do, you shouldn't be editing here. Now go away so you can pretend in some other place that you got bullied by some big bad administrator with his MEAN MEAN cudgel who didn't like Nazis. Drmies (talk) 03:04, 27 December 2017 (UTC)"
1414:- I completely agree on it being repetitive, I think parts of it repeat what was in the previous section, so you may notice, I've removed those parts, I hope that's a good compromise. However, other parts of the section aren't dealt with in the rest of the article, and I think they add to the article overall. I dissagree that the section should be deleted as you had done previously. It discusses reasons why some tank commanders were successful and some weren't, and that's with references. Clearly some tank commanders were better than others based on proven historical records of how many tanks they destroyed - that's documented. The reasons for that are referenced to various RS writing about tank commanders.
1228:
long-range while moving, etc - this is the type of Soviet account we used to read 25 -30 years ago. I had doubts by the end of Fadin's chapter whether he had ever actually even served in a tank unit. On the other hand, the real combat vets are quite reticent to brag about their accomplishments, noting occasionally enemy tanks destroyed or troops killed, but with exaggeration. I was also surprised that several accounts mentioned Soviet troops murdering civilians in
Germany and Romania - clearly the suppression of such unpleasant truths has eased up a bit. Overall, this book is excellent and offers one of the best looks yet at the men who really won the Second World War, Soviet tankers.
961:
anyone, though the extent to which they were successful and the reasons why is under discussion by scholars--but the "Panzer ace" designation as an objective or even quantifiable term for a successful tank commander is not yet proven by reliable sources, setting aside the popular literature, which is precisely the subject matter of contemporary war studies cited in the article. Do you not find it odd that the usually quite comprehensive German wiki has no corresponding article? That the corresponding Dutch article has a completely different kind of title? (Why don't you translate "Lijst van Duitse tankcommandanten en -schutters in de Tweede
Wereldoorlog"
1496:
you want to say the term isn't valid and isn't used, I've not seen that proven anywhere..and there is certainly proof of its use to the contrary. The view that "there is no such thing as Tank Aces" is certainly not something that has consensus. In any case, the number of tanks these tank commanders destroyed is on record. It happened - attempts at blocking and deleting historical, referenced and relevant information from wikipedia (otherwise relevant to this article) IMHO appear to be against what
Knowledge (XXG) is about - that is to provide information relevant to an article for the user, as long as it is referenced from a proper RS.
1237:
themselves... While repelling an enemy attack attempting to assist the encricled grouping, a tank crew from the 22d Guards Tank
Brigade under the command of Communist Lieutenant A.M.Fadin showed exceptional steadfastness, resourcefulness, and initiative. While fighting in the region of Lysianka, the tankists of that crew destroyed three facist tanks, crushed a six-barreled mortar , two machinegun with their crews, and several vehicles, and captured 18 soldiers. The also destroyed a German-facist transport aircraf which was trying to take off after landing by mistake in the combat area.
946:- the only people who have discredited the material supporting the Panzer ace viewpoint are people of the opposing viewpoint (thus a NPOV conflict of interest). There are plenty of editors here who are happy with the material remaining here, and were happy with the article in its previous stable form as it was for a while. As per the above poster, "Given the point above, one should not voluntarily try to influence an article's POV by ignoring sources which disagree with their own personal POVs."
693:
blowing up tanks, and that they may well have been better at it than those "pathetic" Americans, "incompetent and slow" as they were. I do have a POV, of course, in this respect: I'm happy that those Allied wimps won. But by all means, argue that I'm "politicizing" Knowledge (XXG). Now, I just left you a warning about discretionary sanctions on your talk page for a BLP violation you dropped here: you just be very mindful. Drmies (talk) 18:40, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
870:: although it is generally viewed as a bad thing, the lead gives an objective description in which the main characteristics of the subject are mentioned. There is no "judgement" mad of it in any kind - a short allusion to it being viewed in a negative light is only made in the last paragraph of the lead. If it is possible to do that with controversial political topics, surely it is possible to do it with a rather uncontroversial (even if somehow disputed) topic.
1247:
courage, and bravery in battle. When his tank was damaged on July 25th, 1944, comrade
Arslanov did not leave his tank, and destroyed 2 enemy SPGs, even though the enemy did not stop firing at his tank. Only when he was wounded and the tank was engulfed in flames did he leave the tank. For the damage done to the enemy and demonstration of courage and bravery in battle, he is worthy of the highest award of this government, the Hero of the Soviet Union.
1209:"Замечено, что германская и советская пропагандистская модели принципиально отличались. В основе немецкой модели стоял "идеальный воин", уничтожающий врагов в больших количествах. Виттман был идеальным танкистом, Рудель был супергероем для бомбардировочной авиации, Хартман (и еще целая группа асов) - для авиации истребительной. Успех воина измеряется в сбитых истребителях, сожженных танках. Каждый боец должен был равняться на "идеального воина".
1212:"It is noted that the German and Soviet propaganda models were fundamentally different. At the heart of the German model was the "ideal warrior", destroying enemies in large numbers. Wittmann was an ideal tankman, Rudel was a superhero for bomber aviation, Hartman (and a whole group of Aces) - for fighter pilots. The success of a soldier is measured in downed fighters, destroyed tanks. Each soldier had to be equal to the "ideal warrior".
461:
396:
1215:"В советской пропагандистской модели главное место было отведено именно теме подвига (Космодемьянская, Матросов, Гастелло). Превозносился героический поступок какого-то из бойцов в отдельно взятом - часто неравном - бою, причем зачастую закончившимся гибелью этого бойца. Реальность и обстоятельства некоторых из хрестоматийных подвигов советских солдат, совершенных в боях Великой Отечественной, в последнее время также оспариваются."
1218:"In the Soviet propaganda model, the concept was based to the theme of achievement (Kosmodemyanskaya, Matrosov, Gastello). The heroic deed of the soldier was extolled in a specific - often unequal - battle, often ending with the death of this soldier. The reality and circumstances of some of the textbook exploits of Soviet soldiers committed in the battles of the Great Patriotic War have also recently been disputed."
412:
526:
428:
996:"Not all viewpoints are equal" certainly not - but by the same token, that's no excuse for removing a viewpoint, so the article only shows one side of an arguement. If a percieved a viewpoint is more strongly represented in literature, then it may have more weight, as per WP:RSUW...but all sides should still be represented. Given this, will you support the re-inclusion of the opposing viewpoints?
102:
281:
81:
112:
50:
342:
331:
320:
309:
21:
221:
186:
873:
353:
1266:
other tanks as the sign of a tanker's skill, because tanks were easy to see and therefore easy to hit -- instead he regarded destroying anti-tank guns as his most important achievement, because anti-tank guns are normally camouflaged and emplaced and therefore so much more difficult to see and so much more dangerous.
866:), unless there is overwhelming consensus (and even then) that a given viewpoint is not valid or it can be shown that sources usually reject it, the subject matter should be presented objectively, using neutral language, without making judgement of it or it's validity - an example of this is the article on
682:. If you Western Allies POV dupes must win at any cost then so be it- have fun debasing this page and making it absolutely useless. As I have said before- a few of you could care less about improving this online encyclopedia but rather it has become for you an online chat room to win arguments. Have fun!
1495:
That would appear to be your POV. "Tank Ace" (or Panzer Ace) is a commonly used term appearing in many articles discussing people (not just German tank commanders) like
Israeli tank ace Zvika Greengold, Laffayette Poole, Otto Carius and Wittman relating to the large number of tanks they destroyed. If
1204:
The statement "The Soviet Red Army regarded destroying tanks as not being an act of particular heroism for its tank commanders, as the main role of its armoured units was to support infantry" needs attribution, and should be taken as a opinion, not a fact. I suggest it to be rephrased. I will add the
927:
the whole article) could be used for such purpose, but currently it gives no substantial matter to criticize except the fact that "tank aces" were propaganda material - a proposition which by itself is negative. Sorry if this sounds repetitive, but I'm sure there's a way to add in a paragraph or two
922:
Well, it's not as if there were no "successful" tank commanders, yet the article does not talk of that at all (to offer a balanced POV), rather it solely criticizes Nazi propaganda. Care must be taken, even when criticizing subjects, to balance criticism with possible counter-arguments, if such have
880:
6. It is possible to neutrally describe a subject and then spend a good part of the article criticizing it - this article in it's current state could well be titled "Criticism of the concept of Panzer Ace", since it barely describes the subject of "Panzer Ace" beyond the first paragraph, or even the
1265:
I apologize for giving people merely a vague hint of a place to look for further evidence and sources, however I wish to mention my memory of reading an account, probably on
Knowledge (XXG) and probably backed by solid sources, that one of the Soviet Union's top tank aces did not regard destroying
1176:
It would also help to remember that the original "Nazi Fan Boys" were in the U.S. military. John
Mearsheimer calls it "Wehrmacht Penis Envy" and describes how ex Wehrmacht officers in the Bundeswehr were treated like rock stars by their American cohorts. No one did more to clean up the Wehrmacht's
1291:
In our tank forces, higher commanders sometimes authorized these immediate decorations by radio. Because of the way our radio communications were set up, all the subordinates learned about such an award immediately. Headqurters assembled the appropiate documentation and signature for these awards
1246:
A most brave and energetic gunner. During an enemy counterattack between July 17th, 1944 and July 23rd, 1944, during the destruction of the Brody group, he destroyed 5 enemy heavy tanks, 4 anti-tank guns, 10 machine gun nests, and up to 100 soldiers and officers of the enemy, demonstrating skill,
1227:
One or two of the accounts are a bit suspect, particularly one by a
Lieutenant Fadin, who is clearly a liar. Fadin makes one preposterous claim after another, such as shooting down a German fighter with his tank cannon, killing a German general, destroying multiple Tiger tanks, hitting targets at
712:
Neither the insinuations of Nazi sympathies or the personalization of the content is constructive. If you have an issue with the conduct of another editor there are places to take that up. Discourse here has not been at the level we should expect and don't think the sniping and mocking of people,
692:
Yeah, those Germans were awesome, weren't they. I am sure you enjoyed looking at it, with all the little Nazi flags. And you are still picking the wrong fights: I am not arguing that your "amazing" wonderful leather-clad Nazis were absolute bad-ass motherfuckers when it came to killing people and
579:
I an seriously considering tagging this article for POV problems but before pulling the trigger I went back and read it in its entirety. This poor thing has become worse than before! What happened? It has just become a halfhearted impotent attempt to make sure anybody who wants to know something
1288:
destroyed, the number of enemy firing positions suppressed, and so on) and the specific decoration being recommended. By statute, certain quantifiable standards applied to each medal or order, both concerning the enemy personnel or equipment destoryed and the rank or position of the recipient.
1236:
The soldiers of all army formations and units displayed exceptional courage and heroism during the penetration of the enemy's defense on 26 and 27 January, but the soldiers who operated along the external encirclement front of the enemy Korsun'-Shevchenkovskii grouping especially distinguished
960:
Not all viewpoints are equal, Deathlibrarian. The viewpoint that "Panzer ace" is a romanticizing blah blah (I hate being repetitive) is well-established by academic and reliable sources. What would be the opposing viewpoint? That there existed successful tank commanders? That is not doubted by
876:, which makes an interesting point about "tank aces" not being usually credited for kills simply because nobody bothered to keep count and because it was seen as a team effort, is merely used to say that the concept was "rejected" by the US Army, despite the author's more nuanced point of view.
798:
I thought it appropriate for editors to see what we're dealing with in this weird article and its talk page. I was pinged to give an opinion- I haven't edited Panzer Ace for months. I immediately get into a chat room style flame war with a strange person- a Knowledge (XXG) bully?. I don't want
887:- "Use of quotation marks around simple descriptive terms can often seem to imply something doubtful" - if there is doubt about the term, that is usually already written, with letters and words, in the article, without requiring us making an impression on the reader's subjective mind as well.
1287:
The procedure for recommending a soldier or commander for a combat decoration in our 6th Guards Tank Army began with the assembling of an award package by the battalion headquarters. Included in it was a brief description of the heroic act or deed (the number of enemy tropps the soldier had
1241:
But back to the track. As we know the heroic deeds were widely popularised, (newspaper, radio, leaflets) there was scant attention to the use of propaganda as an instrument. This was certainly true also for tank crews and their commanders, as war-time Soviet adward orders show:
1284:? Anyway, Otto Carius kill claims were still exploited by German propaganda, even thought he did it not regarded als a major archivement. Dmitriy Loza, "Fighting for the Soviet Motherland: Recollections from the Eastern Front: Hero of the Soviet Union." p 205 notes:
1010:
I'd be happy for the article to be moved to "tank ace". There is no article covering Non german tank aces (like lafayette Poole) - and may be it would take the heat out of the anti nazi/German discussions that seem to happen here, which IMHO just are not helpful.
881:
first sentence. As example, again, use Fascism: of the article's 175 thousand bytes, only 13 thousand (a subsection about the term being pejorative and then a proper "criticism section") are used to openly criticize it, while the rest is used to describe it.
1102:
IP, I know AGF. I don't know why you think I'm new to this place. Makumbe sympathizes with Nazis, I don't, so I don't see how their mind is in any way like mine. May I suggest that if you don't have a clue you acquire one before you start lecturing others?
680:"But by all means, argue that I'm "politicizing" Knowledge (XXG). Now, I just left you a warning about discretionary sanctions on your talk page for a BLP violation you dropped here: you just be very mindful. Drmies (talk) 18:40, 26 December 2017 (UTC)"
1222:
Milhail Plikarov means similiar accounts just like those of tank commander Fadin Alexander Mikhailovich, in example. Which was aslo criticized heavily by military historian Robert Forczyk in reviewing the book "T-34 in Action" by Artem Dradkin.
1440:
and it was removed for some reason. I don't remember why but I was involved in adding content to it (and admittedly, I had used non-confirmed sourcing for a couple of them, but that shouldn't be a reason to remove the whole list!). Recently,
923:
been noted in sources (and in this case, they have - there were undeniably "successful" (in terms of enemies destroyed or whatever other measure) tank commanders). Deconstructing the propaganda myth is necessary, yes, and a section (or even
403:
196:
1462:
Deathlibrarian, honestly, I made a mistake, taking an old reference link and updating the "OLD-ID". Was not careful enough, sorry for that. But I agree that the list is informative enough to put it back, so I support your viewpoint.
419:
200:
830:, you're more than welcome to reach out to me, or I'm sure Toni, for any information on the best manner in which to proceed with any issues you feel need to be addressed with another editor's conduct toward you, or in general.
1303:
Looking again above to the brief description of comrade Arslanov achivement, we can see how that settled and what their comrades heard from the award recipient in the radio, later published in the Army Newspaper and so on.
783:(and I wouldn't suggest the committee as this is far too low a dispute so they'd likely reject it, but it is an option as he is an admin and functionary). This talk page is for discussing the article, not editor actions.
858:). For example, articles on the biological theory of evolution discuss it as a scientific fact, even if technically there is a small number of sources supporting fringe theories which claim to discredit it.
435:
204:
713:
such as yourself, is going unnoticed. On the other hand, taking a break is sometimes the best remedy to conflict. The page isn't going anywhere and this sort of thing pretty much never helped anyone.
883:
7. What's up with the "quotes" each time Panzer Ace is used? The term is disputed and it might not be a real thing, but using quotes around it is simply not necessary - this is explicitly stated in
979:
The Dutch article has as title "List of German tank commanders and gunners in the Second World War" , and a notice at the bottom states it is a translation of an earlier version of this article...
1445:
has tried to add this content back in, but it was removed. Considering that it is convenient information for the user, I would advocate this list is put back in. Are there any objections to this?
474:
1573:
1578:
928:(more than what there is now, which gives an impression of an unbalanced article) about the nuances of "successful" tank commanders and how it's not solely a "propaganda" thing.
1583:
1588:
294:
271:
233:
904:
All of this proposes that the concept of "Panzer ace" exists outside of the glorifying material discredited by many editors, citing reliable sources, on this very talk page.
1603:
31:
678:
my fellow editors on this Panzer Ace Knowledge (XXG) page. I can't stay because again when involved in this page I find myself threatened by a fellow editor- Mr. Drmies:
280:
854:
1. Policy does not require an article be neutral, only that it be as neutral as the majority sources - bar a few exceptions for using some words instead of others (
1568:
261:
1185:
or "Analysis" in Knowledge (XXG) articles on the U.S Cavalry and its role in the extermination of Native Americans- they won- our extermination was successful.
872:
4. This articles focuses too much on the German (propaganda) use of the term, neglecting for example occurrences of the term to describe soldiers from the US.
1318:
Just an observation – while the Russian’s seem to focus on the achievments of their Tank commanders, rather than “kill numbers” they are still holding them up
728:
Thanks LargelyRecyclable. I will take a break as I said in my previous section. Good luck to you and all of you in cleaning up this article. Happy New Year!
168:
1593:
1138:
Don't ping me, Deathlibrarian--I am not interested in your observations on someone who complained that American historians see Nazis as BAD, BAD people.
1038:(Why don't you translate "Lijst van Duitse tankcommandanten en -schutters in de Tweede Wereldoorlog" neutrally and put your list of Germans there?)Drmies
860:
2. Given the point above, one should not voluntarily try to influence an article's POV by ignoring sources which disagree with their own personal POVs.
1598:
1393:. My rationale was that the content is repetitive. In addition, it uncritically presents the concept of a "tank ace" as if it were a real phenomenon.
228:
191:
1558:
158:
552:
1563:
237:
134:
1292:
later. This method made a significant contribution to troops' morale, and inspiered in them a greater respect for their (tank) commanders.
1530:
1089:
980:
929:
890:
1553:
1182:
1353:
1326:
as hero’s in a similar way German Tank Aces were. Though no Panzer Ace ever shot a plane out of the sky with his tank cannon! :-)
1124:
To be honest, I agree with this IP account, whoever they are. I think you labelling Makumbe as a nazi sympathiser was unnecessary.
1040:" Great minds think alike I guess. This is what I proposed so long ago when I first visited this article. Sorry for negating my
125:
86:
1436:
Previously, for a long time, this article had a list of tank aces. This was quite a good list, with some interesting content -
61:
602:
1181:
reenactors. So called Panzer aces were simply soldiers on the losing side- I don't see much hand-wringing or tags like
27:
835:
718:
534:
481:
477:
490:
1501:
1450:
1419:
1331:
1129:
1016:
1001:
951:
621:
598:
67:
1534:
1093:
984:
933:
894:
232:. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
1526:
1468:
831:
788:
714:
653:
1486:
1398:
1374:
133:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1464:
1442:
547:
49:
20:
1497:
1446:
1415:
1327:
1305:
1251:
1125:
1012:
997:
947:
617:
1084:
I have no clue as to what is between you and Makumbe, but thinking he insulted you is clearly not
1309:
1255:
496:
1515:
https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Talk:Panzer_ace/Archive_1&oldformat=true#Arno_Giesen
1271:
1232:
Unfortunately, such propaganda accounts finds their way uncritical in western academic books:
1190:
1167:
1049:
817:
804:
784:
758:
733:
702:
649:
585:
616:
Its already tagged for Undue weight, for pretty much the reason you were speaking of WP:bal.
1482:
1411:
1394:
1143:
1108:
1064:
970:
909:
511:
492:
460:
1085:
855:
776:
645:
780:
690:
Here's what passes for civil discourse on this Talk Page written about me by Mr. Drmies:
1365:
David Glatz. "Battle for the Ukraine: The Korsun'-Shevchenkovskii Operation" 2004 p. 101
395:
117:
1547:
822:
hat this and the preceding two sections as not being related to the article content.
753:
As much hatred as I've ever encountered on ANY online chat room or forum. What gives?
1267:
1186:
1163:
1045:
878:
5. The article could be moved to "Tank ace" to reflect a more global point of view.
825:
800:
768:
754:
729:
698:
613:
581:
543:
1519:
There is additional new information here indicating that he may have been a fraud.
1481:
No, because it has not been established that a "panzer ace" is a legit concept. --
1139:
1119:
1104:
1079:
1060:
993:
966:
943:
905:
772:
427:
411:
1521:
525:
107:
101:
80:
648:
if you feel you cannot adequately address them with Drmies on his talk page.
884:
863:
749:
This is appropriate on Knowledge (XXG)? From Mr. Drmies Talk Page to me:
1281:
867:
130:
1205:
statement of Russian military historian Mikhail Polikarpov, he notes:
494:
889:
I think this is enough for today - back to less contentious matters.
220:
185:
1538:
1505:
1490:
1472:
1454:
1423:
1402:
1335:
1313:
1275:
1259:
1194:
1171:
1147:
1133:
1112:
1097:
1068:
1053:
1020:
1005:
988:
974:
955:
937:
913:
898:
839:
808:
792:
762:
737:
722:
706:
657:
625:
606:
589:
548:"The Battle for Knowledge (XXG): The New Age of 'Lost Victories'?"
520:
497:
454:
43:
15:
426:
410:
394:
279:
1280:
Are you sure you're not mixing it up with the statement of
1514:
1437:
1390:
292:
This article has been checked against the following
129:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
377:
291:
1177:history than our government- not gamers or crazy
1285:
1244:
1234:
1225:
1207:
862:3. Therefore (sorry if this starts being a bit
1574:Start-Class European military history articles
1513:Referencing the question about Arno Giesen at
1183:uncritical portrayal of the US Seventh Cavalry
1059:Please don't insult me with such comparisons.
1604:Knowledge (XXG) pages referenced by the press
1579:European military history task force articles
1432:Should this article have a list of Tank aces?
597:"pro-Western, neocon POV"? Elucidate please.
505:This page has archives. Sections older than
8:
1584:Start-Class German military history articles
697:Threats and swearing- but I'm the bad guy...
246:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Military history
1589:German military history task force articles
1522:http://fathercodersoldierspy.com/?page_id=9
633:I'm Reporting this talk page to Kiwi Farms
1524:
664:The following discussion has been closed.
640:
374:
288:
180:
75:
226:This article is within the scope of the
1345:
799:anything to do with this article again.
644:Please take any behavioral concerns to
182:
77:
47:
553:The Journal of Slavic Military Studies
515:when more than 8 sections are present.
236:. To use this banner, please see the
1569:Start-Class military history articles
965:and put your list of Germans there?)
771:, if you have behavioral issues with
249:Template:WikiProject Military history
7:
404:European military history task force
123:This article is within the scope of
1044:- after this I really will go away.
575:What happened to this poor article?
143:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Germany
66:It is of interest to the following
420:German military history task force
14:
1594:Start-Class World War II articles
1282:Otto Carius in Tiger's in the Mud
535:mentioned by a media organization
509:may be automatically archived by
30:on 2 October 2016. The result of
1599:World War II task force articles
524:
459:
351:
340:
329:
318:
307:
219:
184:
110:
100:
79:
48:
19:
1559:Low-importance Germany articles
637:Again I must say Aufwiedersehen
266:This article has been rated as
163:This article has been rated as
26:This article was nominated for
1:
1506:00:33, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
1491:04:51, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
1473:11:48, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
1455:23:21, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
1389:Preserving here by providing
1354:Покушение на священные миражи
1098:18:13, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
1069:01:38, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
1054:17:08, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
1021:06:18, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
1006:06:11, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
989:06:03, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
975:05:59, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
956:05:53, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
938:05:45, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
914:05:26, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
899:04:58, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
840:04:21, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
809:04:05, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
793:03:42, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
763:03:36, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
743:Another from Mr. Drmies to me
738:00:59, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
723:23:32, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
707:23:06, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
658:04:59, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
626:11:50, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
607:08:04, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
590:04:25, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
137:and see a list of open tasks.
1564:WikiProject Germany articles
1539:06:33, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
1403:00:51, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
1356:" lit. Debunking Myths, 2004
1336:00:13, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
1314:23:48, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
1276:22:21, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
1260:17:44, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
229:Military history WikiProject
146:Template:WikiProject Germany
1195:21:42, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
1172:19:46, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
1148:04:29, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
1134:08:45, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
1113:18:12, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
1620:
1424:05:02, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
312:Referencing and citation:
169:project's importance scale
434:
418:
402:
373:
265:
252:military history articles
214:
162:
95:
74:
1554:C-Class Germany articles
814:That said, I'd ask that
686:Online Chat Room example
667:Please do not modify it.
436:World War II task force
378:Associated task forces:
323:Coverage and accuracy:
1294:
1249:
1239:
1230:
1220:
775:, please take them to
533:This article has been
431:
415:
399:
356:Supporting materials:
284:
56:This article is rated
1352:Mikhail Polikarpov, "
850:Concerning neutrality
781:arbitration committee
430:
414:
398:
283:
60:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
1438:you can see it here
599:Xanthomelanoussprog
345:Grammar and style:
298:for B-class status:
126:WikiProject Germany
1200:Attribution needed
874:The book by Zaloka
432:
416:
400:
285:
234:list of open tasks
62:content assessment
1541:
1529:comment added by
847:
846:
832:LargelyRecyclable
715:LargelyRecyclable
572:
571:
519:
518:
453:
452:
449:
448:
445:
444:
441:
440:
369:
368:
358:criterion not met
270:on the project's
238:full instructions
179:
178:
175:
174:
42:
41:
1611:
1377:
1372:
1366:
1363:
1357:
1350:
1123:
1083:
942:I disagree with
829:
821:
669:
641:
564:
562:
560:
546:(18 July 2018).
528:
521:
514:
498:
463:
455:
385:
375:
359:
355:
354:
348:
344:
343:
337:
333:
332:
326:
322:
321:
315:
311:
310:
289:
254:
253:
250:
247:
244:
243:Military history
223:
216:
215:
210:
207:
192:Military history
188:
181:
151:
150:
149:Germany articles
147:
144:
141:
120:
115:
114:
113:
104:
97:
96:
91:
83:
76:
59:
53:
52:
44:
23:
16:
1619:
1618:
1614:
1613:
1612:
1610:
1609:
1608:
1544:
1543:
1434:
1387:
1382:
1381:
1380:
1373:
1369:
1364:
1360:
1351:
1347:
1202:
1117:
1077:
852:
823:
815:
665:
639:
577:
568:
567:
558:
556:
542:
538:
510:
499:
493:
468:
383:
357:
352:
346:
341:
335:
330:
324:
319:
313:
308:
251:
248:
245:
242:
241:
208:
194:
148:
145:
142:
139:
138:
116:
111:
109:
89:
57:
12:
11:
5:
1617:
1615:
1607:
1606:
1601:
1596:
1591:
1586:
1581:
1576:
1571:
1566:
1561:
1556:
1546:
1545:
1520:
1518:
1511:
1510:
1509:
1508:
1498:Deathlibrarian
1478:
1477:
1476:
1475:
1447:Deathlibrarian
1433:
1430:
1429:
1428:
1427:
1426:
1416:Deathlibrarian
1386:
1383:
1379:
1378:
1367:
1358:
1344:
1343:
1339:
1328:Deathlibrarian
1324:
1323:
1322:
1321:
1320:
1319:
1298:
1297:
1296:
1295:
1290:
1289:
1217:
1216:
1214:
1213:
1211:
1210:
1201:
1198:
1161:
1159:
1158:
1157:
1156:
1155:
1154:
1153:
1152:
1151:
1150:
1126:Deathlibrarian
1072:
1071:
1042:Aufwiedersehen
1034:
1033:
1032:
1031:
1030:
1029:
1028:
1027:
1026:
1025:
1024:
1023:
1013:Deathlibrarian
1008:
998:Deathlibrarian
948:Deathlibrarian
917:
916:
888:
882:
879:
877:
871:
861:
859:
851:
848:
845:
844:
843:
842:
796:
795:
747:
746:
744:
726:
725:
688:
687:
676:Aufwiedersehen
671:
670:
661:
660:
638:
635:
631:
630:
629:
628:
618:Deathlibrarian
610:
609:
576:
573:
570:
569:
566:
565:
539:
532:
531:
529:
517:
516:
504:
501:
500:
495:
491:
489:
486:
485:
470:
469:
464:
458:
451:
450:
447:
446:
443:
442:
439:
438:
433:
423:
422:
417:
407:
406:
401:
391:
390:
388:
386:
380:
379:
371:
370:
367:
366:
364:
362:
361:
360:
349:
338:
327:
316:
302:
301:
299:
286:
276:
275:
264:
258:
257:
255:
224:
212:
211:
189:
177:
176:
173:
172:
165:Low-importance
161:
155:
154:
152:
135:the discussion
122:
121:
118:Germany portal
105:
93:
92:
90:Low‑importance
84:
72:
71:
65:
54:
40:
39:
32:the discussion
24:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1616:
1605:
1602:
1600:
1597:
1595:
1592:
1590:
1587:
1585:
1582:
1580:
1577:
1575:
1572:
1570:
1567:
1565:
1562:
1560:
1557:
1555:
1552:
1551:
1549:
1542:
1540:
1536:
1532:
1531:63.239.75.165
1528:
1523:
1516:
1507:
1503:
1499:
1494:
1493:
1492:
1488:
1484:
1480:
1479:
1474:
1470:
1466:
1461:
1460:
1459:
1458:
1457:
1456:
1452:
1448:
1444:
1439:
1431:
1425:
1421:
1417:
1413:
1409:
1408:
1407:
1406:
1405:
1404:
1400:
1396:
1392:
1384:
1376:
1375:Tank Archives
1371:
1368:
1362:
1359:
1355:
1349:
1346:
1342:
1338:
1337:
1333:
1329:
1317:
1316:
1315:
1311:
1307:
1302:
1301:
1300:
1299:
1293:
1283:
1279:
1278:
1277:
1273:
1269:
1264:
1263:
1262:
1261:
1257:
1253:
1248:
1243:
1238:
1233:
1229:
1224:
1219:
1206:
1199:
1197:
1196:
1192:
1188:
1184:
1180:
1179:Leibstandarte
1174:
1173:
1169:
1165:
1149:
1145:
1141:
1137:
1136:
1135:
1131:
1127:
1121:
1116:
1115:
1114:
1110:
1106:
1101:
1100:
1099:
1095:
1091:
1090:135.23.202.24
1087:
1081:
1076:
1075:
1074:
1073:
1070:
1066:
1062:
1058:
1057:
1056:
1055:
1051:
1047:
1043:
1039:
1022:
1018:
1014:
1009:
1007:
1003:
999:
995:
992:
991:
990:
986:
982:
981:135.23.202.24
978:
977:
976:
972:
968:
964:
959:
958:
957:
953:
949:
945:
941:
940:
939:
935:
931:
930:135.23.202.24
926:
921:
920:
919:
918:
915:
911:
907:
903:
902:
901:
900:
896:
892:
891:135.23.202.24
886:
875:
869:
865:
857:
849:
841:
837:
833:
827:
819:
813:
812:
811:
810:
806:
802:
794:
790:
786:
782:
778:
774:
770:
767:
766:
765:
764:
760:
756:
752:
745:
742:
741:
740:
739:
735:
731:
724:
720:
716:
711:
710:
709:
708:
704:
700:
695:
694:
685:
684:
683:
681:
677:
673:
672:
668:
663:
662:
659:
655:
651:
647:
643:
642:
636:
634:
627:
623:
619:
615:
612:
611:
608:
604:
600:
596:
595:
594:
593:
592:
591:
587:
583:
574:
555:
554:
549:
545:
541:
540:
536:
530:
527:
523:
522:
513:
508:
503:
502:
488:
487:
484:
483:
479:
476:
472:
471:
467:
462:
457:
456:
437:
429:
425:
424:
421:
413:
409:
408:
405:
397:
393:
392:
389:
387:
382:
381:
376:
372:
365:
363:
350:
347:criterion met
339:
336:criterion met
328:
325:criterion met
317:
314:criterion met
306:
305:
304:
303:
300:
297:
296:
290:
287:
282:
278:
277:
273:
272:quality scale
269:
263:
260:
259:
256:
239:
235:
231:
230:
225:
222:
218:
217:
213:
206:
202:
198:
193:
190:
187:
183:
170:
166:
160:
157:
156:
153:
136:
132:
128:
127:
119:
108:
106:
103:
99:
98:
94:
88:
85:
82:
78:
73:
69:
63:
55:
51:
46:
45:
37:
33:
29:
25:
22:
18:
17:
1525:— Preceding
1512:
1465:Panzerrene50
1443:Panzerrene50
1435:
1388:
1370:
1361:
1348:
1340:
1325:
1286:
1250:
1245:
1240:
1235:
1231:
1226:
1221:
1208:
1203:
1178:
1175:
1160:
1041:
1037:
1035:
962:
924:
853:
818:TonyBallioni
797:
785:TonyBallioni
750:
748:
727:
696:
691:
689:
679:
675:
674:
666:
650:TonyBallioni
632:
578:
557:. Retrieved
551:
544:David Stahel
506:
473:
465:
293:
267:
227:
205:World War II
164:
124:
68:WikiProjects
35:
1483:K.e.coffman
1412:K.e.coffman
1395:K.e.coffman
1385:Recent edit
512:ClueBot III
334:Structure:
268:Start-class
209:Start‑class
1548:Categories
1341:References
1391:this link
963:neutrally
885:MOS:QUOTE
1527:unsigned
1306:Duskinvo
1252:Duskinvo
864:legalese
507:180 days
466:Archives
295:criteria
197:European
28:deletion
1268:MPS1992
1187:Makumbe
1164:Makumbe
1046:Makumbe
868:Fascism
826:Makumbe
801:Makumbe
779:or the
769:Makumbe
755:Makumbe
730:Makumbe
699:Makumbe
614:Makumbe
582:Makumbe
559:1 April
167:on the
140:Germany
131:Germany
87:Germany
58:C-class
1140:Drmies
1120:Drmies
1105:Drmies
1086:WP:AGF
1080:Drmies
1061:Drmies
994:Drmies
967:Drmies
944:Drmies
925:almost
906:Drmies
856:WP:SAY
777:WP:ANI
773:Drmies
646:WP:ANI
201:German
64:scale.
475:Index
262:Start
1535:talk
1502:talk
1487:talk
1469:talk
1451:talk
1420:talk
1410:Hi
1399:talk
1332:talk
1310:talk
1272:talk
1256:talk
1191:talk
1168:talk
1144:talk
1130:talk
1109:talk
1094:talk
1065:talk
1050:talk
1017:talk
1002:talk
985:talk
971:talk
952:talk
934:talk
910:talk
895:talk
836:talk
805:talk
789:talk
759:talk
734:talk
719:talk
703:talk
654:talk
622:talk
603:talk
586:talk
561:2019
36:keep
34:was
159:Low
1550::
1537:)
1504:)
1489:)
1471:)
1453:)
1422:)
1401:)
1334:)
1312:)
1274:)
1258:)
1193:)
1170:)
1146:)
1132:)
1111:)
1096:)
1088:.
1067:)
1052:)
1036:"
1019:)
1004:)
987:)
973:)
954:)
936:)
912:)
897:)
838:)
807:)
791:)
761:)
736:)
721:)
705:)
656:)
624:)
605:)
588:)
550:.
480:,
384:/
203:/
199:/
195::
1533:(
1517:?
1500:(
1485:(
1467:(
1449:(
1418:(
1397:(
1330:(
1308:(
1270:(
1254:(
1189:(
1166:(
1142:(
1128:(
1122::
1118:@
1107:(
1092:(
1082::
1078:@
1063:(
1048:(
1015:(
1000:(
983:(
969:(
950:(
932:(
908:(
893:(
834:(
828::
824:@
820::
816:@
803:(
787:(
757:(
732:(
717:(
701:(
652:(
620:(
601:(
584:(
563:.
537::
482:2
478:1
274:.
240:.
171:.
70::
38:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
