875:
or melt its target by the electrical resistance heating of the target" -- I suppose the energy resulting from the electric current is rather negligible compared with the contained kinetic energy (esp. if you're talking about 1000 MeV). Heat will probably mainly come from the kinetic energy, not the electric discharge current. In any case, large doses of gamma rays will be produced when the electrons hit the target, which constitutes an additional threat to living creatures. Note that electron accelerators (with or without a target for converting the electrons into gamma rays before hitting the patient) are being used for radiotherapy. The reports on the
407:
676:
655:
391:
686:
74:
53:
423:
439:
375:
468:
22:
552:
244:
84:
359:
486:
496:
936:. And there's another section, where citations, at least one of questioned reliability, indicate that particle beam weapons in a non-fictional setting never proceeded beyond experimentation that ended by the late 1980s. Thus, I ask, are or were particle beam weapons ever real, and if not, why does the article describe how they work as though they were real?
202:
158:
896:
becomes very difficult to deflect the beam with reasonably sized magnets, and shielding of meters in depth is unwieldy to say the least. CERN has solid plans for a 4GeV linac, and while the machine will be large, it's not in any way difficult to make reliable. While all of this is still science fiction - it's not so very far from reality.
624:
613:
602:
591:
580:
316:
305:
294:
283:
272:
1122:
Great article no mention that telsa particle beam Death ray plans stolen from his hotel room sfae by the FBI Jan 1943 at the time of tesla dath. Were part of the SDFI Star Wars
Paticle beam Reseach the plans are still at the Lawrenece Livermore Lab Reserarch Library Livermore <calif. I understand
1014:
Um, no, it wasn't really a particle weapon since Telsa's idea of a "particle" was a microscopic object, not molecular or subatomic one like most actual particle weapons. He seems to have been using particle in the sense of a mathematical modelling particle rather than an elementary particle since he
879:
accidents mention what the patients felt when they were being hit by the electron beams. IIRC it was heat, and yes, electric shocks, but they seem to have been not that major, and that has been at "only" 25 MeV. (And a note to post from 70.70.143.237: high energy particle beams seem to be able to go
874:
Re: "An electron particle beam weapon works by disrupting electric circuits and electronic devices in its targets. If any living animals or persons were to be caught by the electric discharge of an electron beam weapon, they would most likely be electrocuted. An electron beam weapon can also damage
895:
Plus, it seems to me that if you were building particle beam weapons in space, you have lots of vacuum available, so beam energies could be way up there. With beams in the GeV category, secondary particles become a larger hazard than the initial beam itself. With heaver particles (eg protons) it
1244:
It looks like who ever posted this reference (6) just did a google search for "Particle Beam weapon" and posted a result after skimming it, if they read it at all. The article in question has nothing to do with a weaponized particle beam, it is about recycling neutrons in fission reactors.
863:
The idea that you cannot shield a target from a particle beam is patent nonsense. To damage a target a weapon must interact with the materials it's composed of. If it will interact with the matter of the target, it will react with shielding. Think about it: if a weapon was totally immune to
841:
This "B.E.A.R. Project" is tinfoil hat garbage. The only references I can find about it are from websites that discuss "chemtrails"and that kind of thing. I can't find anythng non-electronic, and non-batshit crazy. Suggest we remove the "B.E.A.R. Project" stuff completely.
382:
172:
813:
I'm not able to find any evidence of this supposed "B.E.A.R. project" that's referenced in the article, either here or the internet at large. Aside from that, there are no references for this article whatsoever, and much of it (including BEAR) seems apocryphal.
1058:
Removed Tesla section per above, main points were primary sourced and a miss-interpertation of them to boot. 1930s/1940s newspaper articles would have no idea what Tesla had built and the material was simply being interpreted by
Knowledge (XXG) editors. His
414:
180:
950:
The Jed
Margolin page claims his technology can do basically anything, including alter the flow of time. Is not a reliable reference. Come on, there are better references for particle beam technology than this. This page should be folded into the
430:
184:
1298:
366:
168:
1303:
1029:
So we have a "History" section that is 90% Tesla (referenced to Tesla I might add) because? Just an open question, primary sourced material and off topic material should normally be trimmed back or simply deleted.
1368:
1318:
446:
398:
188:
176:
1328:
1323:
1333:
864:
shielding, it would mean it passes through all matter unchanged, which would make a somewhat useless weapon since it would go right through the target without harming it in the slightest--
716:
1093:
In this article it mentions the power of the weapon. Wouldn't this change with size? Why list a figure at all? Where is this information coming from, it is uncited. I'm just asking.
733:
257:
214:
140:
1211:
The first sentence in the article is word for word from the book
Handbook of Defence Electronics and Optronics: Fundamentals, Technologies and Systems by Anil K. Maini.
769:
1273:
130:
565:
551:
243:
1288:
1363:
1293:
1283:
759:
723:
1278:
1268:
1044:
Because Tesla is to science as
Nostradamus is to history: if Tesla made a statement X and any future development even remotely resembles X, Tesla predicted X.
106:
1162:
1373:
1358:
728:
1178:
The word "neutral" should be removed in the first sentence of the second section. You can create a neutral beam, but that is not what is described.
209:
163:
97:
58:
1353:
1348:
1338:
1308:
699:
660:
1343:
1313:
218:
1103:
1179:
999:
711:
972:
526:
508:
473:
1229:
1158:
1072:
1035:
707:
on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
33:
916:
So, looking at the article, I've got a question about the verbs used. I see verbs in the present tense, indicative mood:
1225:
1154:
1068:
1031:
937:
513:. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of
89:
1197:
For fuck's sake, it looks like a 5-year old wrote them. Or someone from China. Shit, man. -December 26th, 2012.
1144:
514:
1107:
39:
21:
1183:
1254:
1003:
213:. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
1250:
1150:
1099:
995:
976:
968:
1064:
406:
1212:
1198:
1049:
1020:
956:
865:
105:
on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1246:
928:. I also note that none of those are cited. I then see some cited sentences with conditional verbs:
832:
Or you could. The paper was published pre-launch, however, so we're still short on info beyond that.
691:
885:
1128:
855:
843:
792:
901:
825:
675:
654:
520:
992:
See
Teleforce in the wikipedia page. This was a particle weapon, eh? Should this be included?
881:
796:
1045:
1016:
1007:
390:
1139:
Hypothetical scenario regarding the employment of particle beams in assassination attempts
501:
102:
1143:
The video is a very recent and controversial event . MUST watch entire video . solve .
1124:
1262:
1224:
and the book was published in 2018, so looks like the author copied
Knowledge (XXG).
952:
897:
833:
815:
704:
1123:
see the boomk by
Margret Cheny "Tesla Man out of Time" Thankjs! Dr. Edson Andre' J.
73:
52:
853:
485:
467:
422:
822:
438:
374:
1233:
1215:
1201:
1187:
1166:
1132:
1111:
1076:
1053:
1039:
1024:
980:
959:
940:
905:
889:
880:
rather deep; and you'd also have to protect against the generated gamma rays.)
868:
858:
846:
800:
681:
491:
79:
1060:
876:
1145:
http://bltwy.msnbc.msn.com/politics/clinton-this-is-a-good-bill--1826.video
852:
Found a pentagon report abstract, looks like the B.E.A.R. Project was real.
703:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
83:
358:
201:
157:
791:
reference 5 leads to 'swiftmoney' now, its a dead link and spam.
15:
1299:
Start-Class military science, technology, and theory articles
1304:
Military science, technology, and theory task force articles
1118:
GREAT ARTICLE! No mention tesla Plans still in US Gov.Hands!
550:
437:
421:
405:
389:
373:
357:
242:
810:
Could a magnetic field disrupt an incoming particle beam?
1193:
Someone clean the opening paragraphs of this article up.
1222:
946:
References 4 and 5 are obviously tinfoil hat material
1369:
Start-Class United States articles of Low-importance
1319:
Start-Class North American military history articles
563:
This article has been checked against the following
255:
This article has been checked against the following
101:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
1329:
Start-Class United States military history articles
1324:
North American military history task force articles
562:
383:
Military science, technology, and theory task force
340:
254:
1334:United States military history task force articles
1221:The article wording dates back to at least 2013
1063:did not shoot subatomic particles nor was it a
8:
824:Maybe you should put this as a reference? --
227:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Military history
115:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Science Fiction
19:
1239:
649:
559:
462:
415:North American military history task force
337:
251:
152:
47:
744:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject United States
431:United States military history task force
507:This article is within the scope of the
207:This article is within the scope of the
1274:Low-importance science fiction articles
955:page without any of the pseudoscience.
651:
464:
154:
49:
1289:Start-Class military aviation articles
525:. To use this banner, please see the
217:. To use this banner, please see the
1364:Low-importance United States articles
1294:Military aviation task force articles
1284:Start-Class military history articles
230:Template:WikiProject Military history
7:
1279:WikiProject Science Fiction articles
1269:Start-Class science fiction articles
697:This article is within the scope of
535:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Aviation
118:Template:WikiProject Science Fiction
95:This article is within the scope of
1015:claimed they could be quite large.
38:It is of interest to the following
1374:WikiProject United States articles
1359:Start-Class United States articles
747:Template:WikiProject United States
14:
684:
674:
653:
622:
611:
600:
589:
578:
494:
484:
466:
314:
303:
292:
281:
270:
200:
156:
82:
72:
51:
20:
764:This article has been rated as
135:This article has been rated as
1240:"China's Particle Beam Weapon"
1202:04:07, 27 December 2012‎ (UTC)
1:
1354:WikiProject Aviation articles
1349:Start-Class aviation articles
1339:Start-Class Cold War articles
1309:Start-Class weaponry articles
1167:05:34, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
1077:13:42, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
960:19:12, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
890:21:03, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
538:Template:WikiProject Aviation
109:and see a list of open tasks.
1344:Cold War task force articles
1314:Weaponry task force articles
1188:16:09, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
1112:02:56, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
869:12:29, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
847:06:25, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
801:19:09, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
367:Military aviation task force
210:Military history WikiProject
1255:15:19, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
1216:03:25, 23 March 2022‎ (UTC)
98:WikiProject Science Fiction
1390:
1234:20:32, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
987:
941:06:28, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
859:05:17, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
770:project's importance scale
583:Referencing and citation:
275:Referencing and citation:
141:project's importance scale
90:Speculative fiction portal
1133:00:22, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
988:Nikola Tesla's Teleforce.
981:06:06, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
906:15:30, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
828:00:14, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
818:23:49, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
763:
700:WikiProject United States
669:
479:
445:
429:
413:
397:
381:
365:
336:
233:military history articles
195:
134:
67:
46:
1054:21:52, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
1040:13:59, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
1025:04:21, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
1008:05:42, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
836:00:23, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
705:United States of America
121:science fiction articles
594:Coverage and accuracy:
341:Associated task forces:
286:Coverage and accuracy:
1226:Fountains of Bryn Mawr
1155:John Charles Webb, Jr.
1135:am480921qstcentdecde.
1069:Fountains of Bryn Mawr
1065:directed-energy weapon
1032:Fountains of Bryn Mawr
965:_________ _________
750:United States articles
627:Supporting materials:
555:
442:
426:
410:
394:
378:
362:
319:Supporting materials:
247:
28:This article is rated
938:The Literate Engineer
554:
441:
425:
409:
393:
377:
361:
246:
32:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
934:... can be generated
692:United States portal
510:Aviation WikiProject
718:Articles Requested!
616:Grammar and style:
569:for B-class status:
449:(c. 1945 – c. 1989)
447:Cold War task force
399:Weaponry task force
308:Grammar and style:
261:for B-class status:
556:
443:
427:
411:
395:
379:
363:
248:
215:list of open tasks
34:content assessment
1170:
1153:comment added by
1102:comment added by
1096:Avian Mosquito.
1067:per description.
1010:
998:comment added by
971:comment added by
784:
783:
780:
779:
776:
775:
648:
647:
644:
643:
640:
639:
629:criterion not met
618:criterion not met
607:criterion not met
596:criterion not met
585:criterion not met
541:aviation articles
527:full instructions
461:
460:
457:
456:
453:
452:
332:
331:
321:criterion not met
310:criterion not met
299:criterion not met
288:criterion not met
277:criterion not met
219:full instructions
151:
150:
147:
146:
1381:
1169:
1147:
1114:
993:
983:
752:
751:
748:
745:
742:
694:
689:
688:
687:
678:
671:
670:
665:
657:
650:
630:
626:
625:
619:
615:
614:
608:
604:
603:
597:
593:
592:
586:
582:
581:
560:
543:
542:
539:
536:
533:
504:
499:
498:
497:
488:
481:
480:
470:
463:
348:
338:
322:
318:
317:
311:
307:
306:
300:
296:
295:
289:
285:
284:
278:
274:
273:
252:
235:
234:
231:
228:
225:
224:Military history
204:
197:
196:
191:
164:Military history
160:
153:
123:
122:
119:
116:
113:
92:
87:
86:
76:
69:
68:
63:
55:
48:
31:
25:
24:
16:
1389:
1388:
1384:
1383:
1382:
1380:
1379:
1378:
1259:
1258:
1242:
1209:
1195:
1176:
1148:
1141:
1120:
1097:
1091:
990:
966:
948:
914:
808:
789:
749:
746:
743:
740:
739:
738:
724:Become a Member
690:
685:
683:
663:
628:
623:
617:
612:
606:
601:
595:
590:
584:
579:
540:
537:
534:
531:
530:
502:Aviation portal
500:
495:
493:
346:
320:
315:
309:
304:
298:
293:
287:
282:
276:
271:
232:
229:
226:
223:
222:
166:
120:
117:
114:
112:Science Fiction
111:
110:
103:science fiction
88:
81:
61:
59:Science Fiction
29:
12:
11:
5:
1387:
1385:
1377:
1376:
1371:
1366:
1361:
1356:
1351:
1346:
1341:
1336:
1331:
1326:
1321:
1316:
1311:
1306:
1301:
1296:
1291:
1286:
1281:
1276:
1271:
1261:
1260:
1241:
1238:
1237:
1236:
1208:
1207:First sentence
1205:
1194:
1191:
1175:
1172:
1140:
1137:
1119:
1116:
1104:71.112.214.245
1090:
1087:
1086:
1085:
1084:
1083:
1082:
1081:
1080:
1079:
989:
986:
985:
984:
947:
944:
913:
910:
909:
908:
850:
849:
838:
837:
807:
804:
788:
785:
782:
781:
778:
777:
774:
773:
766:Low-importance
762:
756:
755:
753:
737:
736:
731:
726:
721:
714:
712:Template Usage
708:
696:
695:
679:
667:
666:
664:Low‑importance
658:
646:
645:
642:
641:
638:
637:
635:
633:
632:
631:
620:
609:
598:
587:
573:
572:
570:
557:
547:
546:
544:
506:
505:
489:
477:
476:
471:
459:
458:
455:
454:
451:
450:
444:
434:
433:
428:
418:
417:
412:
402:
401:
396:
386:
385:
380:
370:
369:
364:
354:
353:
351:
349:
343:
342:
334:
333:
330:
329:
327:
325:
324:
323:
312:
301:
290:
279:
265:
264:
262:
249:
239:
238:
236:
205:
193:
192:
161:
149:
148:
145:
144:
137:Low-importance
133:
127:
126:
124:
107:the discussion
94:
93:
77:
65:
64:
62:Low‑importance
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1386:
1375:
1372:
1370:
1367:
1365:
1362:
1360:
1357:
1355:
1352:
1350:
1347:
1345:
1342:
1340:
1337:
1335:
1332:
1330:
1327:
1325:
1322:
1320:
1317:
1315:
1312:
1310:
1307:
1305:
1302:
1300:
1297:
1295:
1292:
1290:
1287:
1285:
1282:
1280:
1277:
1275:
1272:
1270:
1267:
1266:
1264:
1257:
1256:
1252:
1248:
1235:
1231:
1227:
1223:
1220:
1219:
1218:
1217:
1214:
1213:96.60.207.183
1206:
1204:
1203:
1200:
1199:173.24.99.130
1192:
1190:
1189:
1185:
1181:
1180:50.89.244.188
1173:
1171:
1168:
1164:
1160:
1156:
1152:
1146:
1138:
1136:
1134:
1130:
1126:
1117:
1115:
1113:
1109:
1105:
1101:
1094:
1088:
1078:
1074:
1070:
1066:
1062:
1057:
1056:
1055:
1051:
1047:
1043:
1042:
1041:
1037:
1033:
1028:
1027:
1026:
1022:
1018:
1013:
1012:
1011:
1009:
1005:
1001:
1000:70.68.103.133
997:
982:
978:
974:
970:
964:
963:
962:
961:
958:
957:67.84.146.125
954:
953:Particle beam
945:
943:
942:
939:
935:
931:
927:
923:
919:
911:
907:
903:
899:
894:
893:
892:
891:
887:
883:
878:
872:
870:
867:
866:70.70.143.237
861:
860:
857:
854:
848:
845:
840:
839:
835:
831:
830:
829:
827:
823:
819:
817:
811:
805:
803:
802:
798:
794:
786:
771:
767:
761:
758:
757:
754:
741:United States
735:
732:
730:
727:
725:
722:
720:
719:
715:
713:
710:
709:
706:
702:
701:
693:
682:
680:
677:
673:
672:
668:
662:
661:United States
659:
656:
652:
636:
634:
621:
610:
599:
588:
577:
576:
575:
574:
571:
568:
567:
561:
558:
553:
549:
548:
545:
528:
524:
523:
518:
517:
512:
511:
503:
492:
490:
487:
483:
482:
478:
475:
472:
469:
465:
448:
440:
436:
435:
432:
424:
420:
419:
416:
408:
404:
403:
400:
392:
388:
387:
384:
376:
372:
371:
368:
360:
356:
355:
352:
350:
345:
344:
339:
335:
328:
326:
313:
302:
291:
280:
269:
268:
267:
266:
263:
260:
259:
253:
250:
245:
241:
240:
237:
220:
216:
212:
211:
206:
203:
199:
198:
194:
190:
186:
185:United States
182:
181:North America
178:
174:
170:
165:
162:
159:
155:
142:
138:
132:
129:
128:
125:
108:
104:
100:
99:
91:
85:
80:
78:
75:
71:
70:
66:
60:
57:
54:
50:
45:
41:
35:
27:
23:
18:
17:
1243:
1210:
1196:
1177:
1149:— Preceding
1142:
1121:
1095:
1092:
991:
967:— Preceding
949:
933:
930:would negate
929:
925:
921:
917:
915:
898:Norm Reitzel
873:
862:
851:
821:Well I did.
820:
812:
809:
790:
765:
729:Project Talk
717:
698:
564:
521:
515:
509:
256:
208:
136:
96:
40:WikiProjects
1247:Petersen W.
1098:—Preceding
1046:Herr Gruber
1017:Herr Gruber
994:—Preceding
973:71.9.111.76
605:Structure:
522:task forces
297:Structure:
30:Start-class
1263:Categories
516:open tasks
173:Technology
1125:Andreisme
1061:Teleforce
877:Therac-25
1174:Untitled
1163:contribs
1151:unsigned
1100:unsigned
996:unsigned
969:unsigned
806:Untitled
566:criteria
532:Aviation
474:Aviation
258:criteria
189:Cold War
177:Weaponry
169:Aviation
926:damages
918:ionizes
856:Bigshot
844:GodHead
793:Rqpaine
768:on the
139:on the
826:Kyleca
734:Alerts
36:scale.
1089:Power
912:Verbs
834:siafu
816:siafu
1251:talk
1230:talk
1184:talk
1159:talk
1129:talk
1108:talk
1073:talk
1050:talk
1036:talk
1021:talk
1004:talk
977:talk
922:uses
902:talk
886:talk
882:Cjt2
797:talk
787:note
519:and
760:Low
131:Low
1265::
1253:)
1232:)
1186:)
1165:)
1161:•
1131:)
1110:)
1075:)
1052:)
1038:)
1023:)
1006:)
979:)
932:,
924:,
920:,
904:)
888:)
871:.
799:)
347:/
187:/
183:/
179:/
175:/
171:/
167::
1249:(
1228:(
1182:(
1157:(
1127:(
1106:(
1071:(
1048:(
1034:(
1019:(
1002:(
975:(
900:(
884:(
795:(
772:.
529:.
221:.
143:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
