Knowledge (XXG)

Talk:PewDiePie/GA1

Source 📝

173:), and there's few unsourced claims (the first line in "Continued growth (2014-present)", where it mentions that he said that he'd upload less; and the bit in "Becoming the most subscribed user (2013)" where it says that he retook the spotlight). Assuming Tumblr and the other unreliable sources are okay since they only seem to be used for minor things, I'd be all for supporting this. 527: 513: 496: 479: 466: 453: 436: 42: 271:
is at the top, it's technically about the person, so that's why it'd be further down. I'm not aware of any CC-BY-SA or free-er images of him specifically, and haven't been able to find any by looking (although I don't do a lot of image work, so there could be some very good websites I'm missing).
379:
It's pretty good. I notice a few short paragraphs and some small parts that could be better worded, so I'll take care of that. For future reference, Supernerd, I suggest going through each of the GA criteria individually. The only ones I think any new reviewer who's an experienced editors would
256:
Thanks for commenting on this; it'd been awhile with nobody doing anything here. Going through with Ctrl-F, it appears that someone's already fixed the date and contraction issues, so that's good. There's a picture of his channel logo down, and while it seems odd that it's further down and the
394:
Thanks for the ping, though I'm at work at the moment and I can't check through the whole of the article, but from a first glance it seems the prose is looking almost solid enough. I would advise to cut down on some of the citations in the lead per
208:
said, so you might want to find some other references to support those areas. There should be an image in the beginning of the article, maybe a picture of him, or maybe his logo on Youtube. (Just saying, anything else works too.)
364:
not sure where you would of seen my name before, I haven't done any GAN's for a while, but here I am :) I've looked through in some detail, and apart from some gen fixes, this looks ready to go to me. Suggest promotion.
522:
Illustrated (has necessary images & properly tagged, not too many graphics): Needs a picture of him (and maybe one or two of something he's done), but I haven't been able to find a free image, so still counts as
399:- as it discourages non-controversial information to be cited. I take a unconventional but agreeable approach on focusing on the quality of the prose in contrast to technical points. 169:
From what I can tell, this article's pretty good. Looking over the reflist at the end, most of the refs are good (although there's a couple like Facebook used that aren't
567: 80: 70: 380:
really have trouble with are reliable sources and prose quality, in which case I'd suggest just looking at other GAs or asking other editors for input.
47: 335:? I've worked with Tezero before on some video game-related stuff, I've seen the others in GAN discussions in the same vein as this one. 126: 75: 548: 347: 284: 185: 156: 222:, dates shouldn't have -th after them. For example, if there was a date that said January 30th, it should be changed to January 30. 52: 122: 432:
No immediate failures (excessive cleanup banners, copyright infringement, or far from satisfying any of the GA criteria):
107: 239:
I know that it is your GAR, so I'll let you decide what to do with this article. Thanks for lettng me provide comments.
215:
I found the word "isn't" and if it is not in quotes, then you should probably try to change it so it says "is not."
99: 258: 201:
I've decided to help with this review. Let me know if you want these comments. After all, it is your GAR.
489: 542: 341: 278: 179: 150: 506: 396: 308: 245: 575: 370: 324: 561: 538: 410: 385: 359: 337: 298: 274: 234: 205: 175: 146: 446: 219: 303: 240: 170: 167:
I've never reviewed a GAN/FAN before, so if I do anything wrong, feel free to correct me.
572: 115: 17: 553: 313: 250: 428:
Alright, going through the criteria point-by-point to make sure everything's good:
366: 332: 403: 381: 328: 320: 92: 272:
Also haven't been able to find a better source for the ill-sourced bits.
319:
I apologize for the hiatus, but let's see who else might be interested:
581: 420: 389: 374: 352: 289: 190: 160: 445:
Well-written (clear prose and not too wordy, spelling and grammar,
475:
Broad coverage (talks about PewDiePie as a whole, stays focused):
134: 103: 231:
I think this article should be promoted to GA status.
568:
Knowledge (XXG):Good article nominations/Instructions
225:
Every little comment was found by the peer reviewer.
262: 462:Verifiable (good sourcing, no original research): 505:Stable (doesn't change frequently, especially in 204:Let's see, Facebook is usually unreliable, as 218:Let's see, another thing I found is that per 8: 566:In that case, you may close the review per 259: 30: 61: 33: 7: 24: 525: 511: 494: 477: 464: 451: 434: 1: 251:23:02, 27 February 2015 (UTC) 191:17:45, 17 February 2015 (UTC) 161:17:45, 17 February 2015 (UTC) 196: 598: 582:17:31, 19 March 2015 (UTC) 554:16:16, 16 March 2015 (UTC) 421:11:53, 12 March 2015 (UTC) 390:00:29, 12 March 2015 (UTC) 375:17:21, 11 March 2015 (UTC) 353:15:45, 11 March 2015 (UTC) 314:23:56, 1 March 2015 (UTC) 290:04:19, 1 March 2015 (UTC) 197:Yoshi24517's suggestions 327:probably will, maybe 295:Tagging to promote: 488:Neutral (unbiased, 509:-like situations: 269: 268: 168: 89: 88: 589: 580: 578: 565: 552: 547: 533: 529: 528: 519: 515: 514: 502: 498: 497: 485: 481: 480: 472: 468: 467: 459: 455: 454: 442: 438: 437: 415: 408: 363: 351: 346: 306: 302: 288: 283: 260: 243: 238: 206:User:Supernerd11 189: 184: 166: 139: 130: 111: 43:Copyvio detector 31: 597: 596: 592: 591: 590: 588: 587: 586: 576: 571: 559: 551: 545: 537: 526: 524: 512: 510: 495: 493: 478: 476: 465: 463: 452: 450: 435: 433: 411: 404: 357: 350: 344: 336: 312: 304: 296: 287: 281: 273: 265: 249: 241: 232: 199: 188: 182: 174: 120: 97: 91: 85: 57: 29: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 595: 593: 585: 584: 541: 535: 534: 520: 503: 486: 473: 460: 447:MoS guidelines 443: 426: 425: 424: 423: 392: 377: 340: 310: 293: 292: 277: 267: 266: 263: 247: 227: 226: 224: 223: 217: 216: 211: 210: 198: 195: 194: 193: 178: 140: 87: 86: 84: 83: 78: 73: 67: 64: 63: 59: 58: 56: 55: 53:External links 50: 45: 39: 36: 35: 28: 25: 23: 18:Talk:PewDiePie 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 594: 583: 579: 574: 569: 563: 558: 557: 556: 555: 550: 544: 540: 532: 521: 518: 508: 504: 501: 491: 487: 484: 474: 471: 461: 458: 448: 444: 441: 431: 430: 429: 422: 419: 416: 414: 409: 407: 402: 398: 393: 391: 387: 383: 378: 376: 372: 368: 361: 356: 355: 354: 349: 343: 339: 334: 330: 326: 322: 318: 317: 316: 315: 309: 307: 300: 291: 286: 280: 276: 270: 264:PewDiePie/GA1 261: 255: 254: 253: 252: 246: 244: 236: 230: 221: 214: 207: 202: 192: 187: 181: 177: 172: 165: 164: 163: 162: 158: 155: 152: 148: 145: 141: 138: 137: 133: 128: 124: 119: 118: 114: 109: 105: 101: 96: 95: 82: 79: 77: 74: 72: 69: 68: 66: 65: 60: 54: 51: 49: 46: 44: 41: 40: 38: 37: 32: 26: 19: 536: 530: 516: 499: 482: 469: 456: 439: 427: 417: 412: 405: 400: 325:Sergecross73 294: 228: 213:Punctuation: 212: 203: 200: 153: 143: 142: 135: 131: 117:Article talk 116: 112: 93: 90: 81:Instructions 562:Supernerd11 539:Supernerd11 397:WP:LEADCITE 360:Supernerd11 338:Supernerd11 299:Supernerd11 275:Supernerd11 235:Supernerd11 176:Supernerd11 147:Supernerd11 104:visual edit 570:. Thanks, 490:due weight 305:Yoshi24517 242:Yoshi24517 48:Authorship 34:GA toolbox 144:Reviewer: 71:Templates 62:Reviewing 27:GA Review 543:Firemind 507:edit war 492:given): 342:Firemind 279:Firemind 229:Overall: 180:Firemind 171:reliable 157:contribs 76:Criteria 549:Pokedex 367:Mdann52 348:Pokedex 333:Mdann52 285:Pokedex 186:Pokedex 127:history 108:history 94:Article 382:Tezero 329:Jaguar 321:Tezero 311:Online 248:Online 220:WP:MOS 136:Watch 16:< 531:Done 517:Done 500:Done 483:Done 470:Done 457:Done 440:Done 386:talk 371:talk 331:and 323:and 151:talk 123:edit 100:edit 577:679 546:^_^ 449:): 413:uar 406:Jag 345:^_^ 282:^_^ 183:^_^ 388:) 373:) 159:) 125:| 106:| 102:| 573:C 564:: 560:@ 418:☯ 401:☯ 384:( 369:( 362:: 358:@ 301:: 297:@ 237:: 233:@ 154:· 149:( 132:· 129:) 121:( 113:· 110:) 98:(

Index

Talk:PewDiePie
Copyvio detector
Authorship
External links
Templates
Criteria
Instructions
Article
edit
visual edit
history
Article talk
edit
history
Watch
Supernerd11
talk
contribs
17:45, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
reliable
Supernerd11
Firemind
Pokedex
17:45, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
User:Supernerd11
WP:MOS
Supernerd11
Yoshi24517

23:02, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.