3209:. No one carefully goes through a page and looks up the cite to ensure it says what it is supposed to and then attests to having done so. This is what a real scholarly reference work does. In fact, just having a supposed source is treated like a talisman here. Slapping a source on something makes the statement supposedly supported non-removable. I don't even go into the question of the evaluation of reliability, etc., of the source. Yet the "needs cite" tage is slapped on things in a ridiculous and haphazard way because no one goes through an article with a view to its overall balance, accuracy, sourcing, etc. The most obviously unsupported statements (whether true or not) can go unsupported and yet a "needs cites" tag can be slapped on a bibliography. The tag says unsupported facts can be deleted. This one was added a year-and-a-half ago and no cites have been provided. Is it time to remove the Selected Bibliography?
3145:
to stand for several months it was deleted by
Knowledge (XXG) administrators with China ISPS (china investors funding the Pearl: The Musical premiering at Lincoln Center in NYC In August 2015, i.e., the promoters were very disturbed to have their US production team be upset upon learning of Pearl Buck's involvement in Canada Scoops). Now after realizing that denying what is well cited isn't a smart strategy they are allowing references to Pearl S Buck's involvement to be published on Knowledge (XXG) but only if another person is stated as being responsible for her involvement. it's a ridiculous manipulation of the US involvement in Canada Scoops that was initiated with the 'China ISPs'
2381:(As I'm studying Eichmann more in depth now, I ran across this issue and saw that it was not mentioned on Buck's Wiki page. Whether it was a good thing or not, it matters not. As I already mentioned, this is not a judgment issue; it's just a part of history. Buck did involve herself into a part of this contentious historical period, and it should be incorporated into her bio. Regarding human rights, was she known to be anti-capital punishment? I suppose I'm suggesting that anyone who is an expert on Pearl Buck might know the reason(s) she petitioned Israel to not hang Eichmann (what was her particular interest in this one case, etc.)
1968:
in a significant way personally, I'm far from sure that the section really should be in this article. Now, if the works are significant enough to be mentioned in the biography of the illustrator, that would be a separate thing entirely. And certainly such content would be welcome included in the content relating to the individual book itself. But the essence of such an article like this is the subject of the article herself, not her books per se, so unless the illustrator made a significant, recognized contribution to the artist's life or work, I am far from sure that such content should be in this article about the author herself.
2643:, you may well be right about an organized campaign, but I think we should make clear that you and I are not "organized" (well, maybe I should speak only for myself as one of the least organized people I know) and that we are not gatekeepers or protectors of PSB. I have done research on Buck and am familiar with her work, but I am not now nor have I ever been connected to Welcome House, to any musical about Buck, or to anyone connected with them. To be clear, the editors who have removed questionable material are only following Knowledge (XXG) policy that is applied to all material and we are interested only in fairness.
976:
955:
567:
881:
1198:
Having said that, I appreciate the potential confusion in the text with Pearl Buck's husband's name John. L. Buck; use of which being truncated to 'Buck' (a minor problem of text confusion). However, the more important issue here is the use of any persons' first name (family/first cultural conventions aside) which carries the immediate underlying implication of intimacy, OR, it is by default, extremely patronising. ALL Knowledge (XXG) articles/contributors should bear this in mind for future (and current) contributions. Cheers, Karl
Gillies
1062:
1044:
493:
1133:
1112:
2866:
not a part of, you then contest the validity of the statement that 'Pearl S Buck and her
Welcome House adoption agency were involved in placing victims of Canada Scoops in USA.' You do so saying that even documentation provided on Pearl S Buck Welcome House adoption agency own letterhead, evidence that supports the information provided by National Archives of Canada and APTN, is not sufficient. I mean if their own words on their own letterhead isn't sufficient for Knowledge (XXG), what will be?
699:
2855:
providers are
Knowledge (XXG) Placement Services. On average the charges are anywhere from $ 4-10k/month for 'Knowledge (XXG) Content and Editorial Experts' who then monitor and make sure that the information about clients that appear on Knowledge (XXG) complement the clients' public image goals. So as far as validating an event according to if it did/didn't get media coverage, media coverage is a near worthless indicator. You know that though. I mean if I know that, you certainly know that.
672:
75:
3017:
There is also often more critical or negative scholarly material on her from 1930 to 1970 included the criticism of her nobel award and the infamous "lex buck". In fact there is probably enough material to write a longer section on the history of her popular and scholarly reception, which changed over time. Currently we don't even mention movies based on her novels or stories in the legacy section, there at least 6 major international or
Hollywood one, that I'm aware of.--
871:
194:
850:
802:
378:
357:
709:
2870:
blame for Pearl S Buck
Welcome House adoption agency role in brokering/transiting/trafficking Canada Scoops Victims to USA on that of some Arthur Murray School dance instructor. Now THAT is something that, especially because of how well that story would fit into a musical (Pearl: The Musical, set to premiere at New York City's Lincoln Center, August 2015) AND because nobody has ever heard that allegation before, needs more citation, right?
814:
388:
325:
249:
222:
132:
108:
259:
37:
21:
3117:
Foundation is now becoming tainted by these denials within the
Knowledge (XXG) page of Pearl S Buck, i.e., the attempts to minimize her role in bringing Canada Scoops victims to USA and the simultaneous scapegoating/making a former Arthur Murray dance school instructor, Theodore Harris, culpable is misleading and leaves a question mark over the validity of the entire page.
66:
1643:
this is a popular view of the last empress, and Pearl S. Buck, with that knowledge, really showed her readers a more sympathetic picture. I know she was no historian, but her works brought Asian culture to light in the
Western world. Lu Xun's work sounds very interesting, and I thank you for letting us know about him. I'm definitely going to find some of his work.
483:
462:
3121:
malnutrition that they were being raised in and which never would have provided them with the opportunities that they were given in USA by the smart placement decisions made by Pearl S Buck
Welcome House adoption agency, and which allowed several of them to achieve real material and reputation success, millionaire status, national championship titles, etc.
598:
142:
2897:. But you still need independent reliable sources. So far all you have mentioned is a TV documentary, which does not seem to be readily accessible. Is there any mainstream academic literature on the role of Welcome House or discussion in the press of any relevant findings of the "Truth and Reconciliation" commission?
2862:, and most thoroughly via Aboriginal People's Television Network (APTN) documentary which I have provided adequate and accurate citations for and which Knowledge (XXG) has then deleted. APTN is a highly regarded academic style media outlet managed and staffed by many well regarded North American Indian scholars.
1318:"The family was sent to Zhenjiang, China in 1892 when Pearl was 3 months old. She was raised in California and learned the Chinese language and customs from a teacher named Mr. Kung. She was taught English as a second language by her mother and tutor. She was encouraged to write things at an early age.
3204:
I have recently seen the widespread misuse of a template by tag-happy editors on many writers' pages, including this one. I'm talking about the use of the "refimprove section" tag on bibliographies or lists of writings. What kind of citation is needed? A third party writing attesting to the fact that
3144:
this Pearl S Buck Page is more public relations tool than periodical reference. Why is that? In particular Pearl S Buck's unique and integral role in the transiting of Canada Scoops
Victims-Children to USA via her Pearl S Buck Welcome House Adoption Agency. After editing and allowing this information
3120:
If there is any value placed on accuracy and full-context then Pearl S Buck's role has to be admitted. It can even be admitted along with a description of the context of the times during which it happened, i.e., most of these victims are relieved to have been taken out of the poverty marked by severe
2928:
I've added a subsection on Harris (there seems to be some incidental repetitiousness, so maybe a copy edit is in order, but I'm too tired). Again, I could find nothing significant about Canada (well nothing at all actually) in the sources, which seem to be about scandals in the South Korean press and
2865:
What's more, while you are expressing that it has to be covered by media to qualify for placement on Knowledge (XXG) and when it is shown to have been you then express it has to be covered by certain ilk of media which via your subsequent deletions we are going to guess the media who did cover it are
2665:
can be identified, a correct summary of the source is welcome here. I strongly suggest that people search newspaper archives. There are quite a few, many online, that would have covered this information if it is public knowledge. In particular, if an official enquiry verified it, that will certainly
2551:
participation is significant. I have no problem with the information and as far as I can tell, neither do the other editors. But on the other hand, Knowledge (XXG) cannot allow either favorable or unfavorable information without documentation that can be checked. Generally the policy is to refer to a
1983:
To me the current placement is awkward and give it some undue weight. I would rephrase and move it under each of the two books in the bibliography section; if and when the books have their own articles they can be sent there. If there is more to the story/connection then possibly explore what that is
1835:
a language study guide. However, after reading the article, and seeing that she spent significant time in China, and wrote about her experiences, it seems contextually appropriate. Perhaps it would belong in another section of the article, however, other than the intro, as the intro gives no clues
1757:
Since the 90s there has been somewhat of a mostly positive reevaluation of PSB's work by literature scholars, critics and authors, which dismisses much of her past critics for the reasons stated above. Her work has experienced a reappraisal or rediscovery in the West and in China alike. Interestingly
1652:
Comments like "unreadable," "cheesy melodrama," and "maunderings" are hardly NPoV and, to those who know the work, are quite simply inaccurate. Buck's books, aside from being excellent storytelling, made many non-Asians far more interested in China than they would otherwise have been. Her influence
2869:
The people entering information on behalf of Pearl S Buck page have even gone so far at one point as to say that while Pearl S Buck and her Welcome House adoption agency were involved in Canada Scoops from the USA side, it wasn't her fault, she wasn't in control of her own business, i.e., they place
2007:
I agree to a point, remove the section and add the info in the bibliography section instead, the whole article needs expanding so, to me, removing information is not the answer. Every article is an organic process with sections growing unevenly. If consensus is that it simply has no place in the bio
1879:
Factual, but not integral, unless your references make it clear that Maxwell maintained a special or exclusive relationship with Buck, which might be worth mention, i.e., 'Maxwell was the only artist to illustrate Buck's work for a ten year period, at the author's insistence'. Currently, the passage
1230:
It pains me to see how little about the book is written in her Knowledge (XXG) entry. Its like a Salinger entry without a mention of "Catcher in the Rye". It's a HUGE part of why she's famous in the first place. I'd do it myself but I wouldn't even know where to start. Someone please add this. Thank
2765:
There needs to be a section that describes the unique and essential role that Pearl S Buck and her Welcome House Adoption Agency played in the transiting and placement of victims of Canada Scoops in USA. Every time that information, and it is well and thoroughly cited, has been added to the Pearl S
2682:
for assisting legitimate social service agencies to find adopting families for the children in their care. If some of those children were taken from their parents for reasons that would no longer be considered legitimate, that's hardly the responsibiliy of the agency that looks for families to take
1967:
Personally, I have to wonder about the relevance of such a section in what is essentially a biography of the subject. I know that the author does not necessarily generally select those who illustrate their books, so unless there is some clear evidence that the author chose the artists, or knew them
1642:
I haven't read all of her novels, but I think 'cruel irony' is a little harsh on the award and on her. I thought Imperial Woman was a pretty insightful book. I felt pity and anger for Tsu Hsi when I read it, as opposed to the extremely negative view most of my Chinese relatives have of her. I think
1606:
and from looking at a list of her works in one of her books at the library, I know now that they are written by her. The library didn't have those books, so I don't know if they are biographies. Anyway, I will change the section header to be under "Bibliography." Also, should this "Bibliography" be
1197:
I'm replacing the highly patronizing use of Buck's first name 'Pearl' in this article (except where contextually appropriate) with the impersonal neutral last name 'Buck'. Why? Who contributed all this information? - chances are (high) that they were no one with whom Buck was personally acquainted.
2057:
Agreed. If the illustrators figured prominently in the author's life, then they could reasonably be included in the biography where appropriate. However, the illustrators of an author's work tend in general not to be particularly relevant to the author's life, which is the subject of this article.
1808:
While an article was written alledging management misconduct at Pearl S. Buck International in 2004, it was considered poorly sourced (the primary source was a fired employee) and did not result in any penalties for the organization. Furthermore, the wiki post suggests that it is inappropriate to
1712:
This comment about the poverty and cheesy nature of much of Buck's writing seem appropriate and well stated. Apart from a certain childish romanticism, Imperial Woman is turgid nonsense. The point about Lu Xun is well put--an extraordinary writer with one of the greates ranges of any writer in the
1633:
While the Nobel prizes for literature are known for the writers ignored (Henry James, Mark Twain etc), it is hard to imagine there is a prize less deserved than Pearl Bucks. Her books include some that are simply unreadable (Imperial Woman--cheesy melodrama) and some that add nothing to the sum of
3162:
There is not a true sentence in this paragraph, except (perhaps) "Why is that?": Knowledge (XXG) is not a "periodical reference," Buck had no role in transiting, "Knowledge (XXG) administrators" did not delete "this information" (I did, and I am an "editor" not an administrator"), I do not have a
2904:
ages ago, mainly because I fell in love with Luise Rainer when I saw the film on TV as a teenager. I wasn't overwhelmed by the book. If this article is to be faulted, I'd suggest that it's because it does not discuss the extent to which she is often said to be the least worthy winner of the Nobel
1812:
The article about mismanagement at PSBI is misleading and contradicts the confirmed standing of her organization within the charitable and philanthropic community. Considering also that there is no source listed for this citation, and that its claims have not been verified in any official way, I
1522:
another "weird" sentence in the Legacy section: "It was her efforts to foster Chinese women's liberation through her writing, and to serve as a translator that both empowered and silenced many women's voices and experiences in the process." What is being said? Empowered and Silenced? Doesn't make
3016:
Yes the current distraction aside there are a lot of things that could be improved and there is not Peter Conn's but variety of "newer" books and articles on her from the 1990s (which are somewhat coincide with her reevaluation), some of them are already mentioned in the further reading section.
2854:
And, in my own line of work, I have been paid very well to keep negative information regarding my clients actions out of the media. Keeping negative news about people, companies, countries out of the media is an industry. Not part of my industry but something that we are offered by other service
2766:
Buck Knowledge (XXG) page it has been deleted for no reason other than that the information - if it's not considered within the context of the time that the 'transiting' of the Scoop Victim children occurred - contradicts the descriptions of her work that are more easily perceived as honourable.
2885:
Pearl Buck was in her 70s when these events took place. I've no idea how "hands on" she was at Welcome House at the time - post-1960. Why are you so keen to "blame" her personally? What purpose does that serve? Is it somehow worse if Buck was responsible for decisions rather than Harris? Why? I
2769:
Descriptions of her participation and that of her Welcome House Adoption Agency in placement of Canada Scoops Victims in USA is contained in National Archives of Canada, Truth & Reconciliation Commission - Canada Victim Statement Files, were included in an academic documentary published and
2550:
for your dedication to a good cause and your perseverance. Your edit was indeed more in proportion, but the problem is with the sourcing. Knowledge (XXG)'s policies may seem obstructive, but over the years I have come to understand the reasons behind them. This piece of information about Buck's
2715:
I'm rather astonished to see dispute resolution request for this and personally given what I've seen so far I'm beginning to doubt the "good faith". Other from the IP posting on my talk page that's copied here, the user showed no inclination to engage on the article's talk page despite several
2532:
tags). I don't see any file number in what you wrote. I also did not manage to find a mention of that file in 10 minutes searching on the Canadian archives web site. Can you show us how to verify that the file exists? Can you provide quotations from the file in support of your text? Is the
1920:
untrue. It says he illustrated The Exile and Fighting Angel. How can one infer otherwise? Maxwell illustrated more works for Buck, including "China Sky" and serialized magazine editions of The Exile and Fighting Angel in Collier's and Woman's Home Companion magazines. But I am still working on
3116:
It's a shame that, when it comes to the role that Pearl S Buck and her Welcome House Adoption Agency played in Canada Scoops/60's Scoops in USA, that what started out in 2012 as a really good, cooperative-compassionate relationship with the people at Pearl S Buck International - Welcome House
2677:
Welcome House specialised in getting Asian children adopted, at a time when the great majority of adopting parents were white and wanted white babies (and this was the so-called "Baby scoop era" in which large numbers of illegitimate children of all races were taken for adoption). It would be
2377:
This is not a small thing. It's not to judge her either way, but at that time in history, it was a very big issue. Ms. Buck was very famous and it was contentious that she was making a plea for his life. And since this was a segment in her life which was highlighted, I believe it should be
2945:
Friends: I suggest that we do not need to respond to charges such as those at the head of this section and above. At least four editors have given clear and patient explanations to no avail. There is in fact now a sentence in the article on the charges. Unless new material or new sources are
2736:
In Canadian maternity "homes" and hospitals, up to 100% of newborns were stolen from their legal mothers during the birthing process and trafficked for adoption purposes. These newborns were stolen under an illegal secret Health and Welfare protocol. In addition to being exploited for their
2701:. I should add that I've looked for sources myself but have so far found nothing. I don't doubt the truth of the basic claim - that WH facilitated adoptions from Canada, but that does not seem to be identified as a significant issue in the, admittedly fairly small, literature on the topic.
1761:
Lastly all the personal opinions that WP-editors might have of PSB are largely irrelevant. The only thing that matters here, is a somewhat fair representation of what reputable sources say about PSB. In that regard you can easily verify the points i've stated above if you google for recent
2088:
I find I'm unable to get much past the first one or two paragraphs of this article because it reads like a fourth-grade essay. Aside from grammar/syntax/punctuation errors (of which there are, sadly, a not insignificant number), the style itself is simplistic to the point of being almost
1324:
How was she raised in California if she was in China from 3 months until 18 years? Furthermore, to say that she "was taught English as a second language from her mother..." defies logic. Is that supposed to mean Kung taught her Chinese before she learned to speak English? -by the mighty
2514:
Last week I was informed by some that are employed to 'safeguard' the legacy of Pearl S Buck (and their investment in a musical production on her life) that they do not want this information published; I hope that is not the reason the information is being taken down beginning last week.
2034:
Again, it's a biography of Pearl Buck, not an entry to include those who worked with her in the fields of art or literature, from which hundreds of people would be included. An encyclopedic biography covers the essentials of a figure's life. To use it otherwise suggests an agenda.
1713:
20th century. Novelist, historian, literary historian, journalist of great power. His newspaper essays are just extraordinary and offer a powerful sense of China at one of the most turbulent and fraught times in modern history. Once you read Lu Xun, Pearl Buck becomes unendurable.
2850:
However, And Of Course, While It Is True That The Media Does Cover These Events, It Is Also Not Necessarily True That If An Event Is Taking Place It's Going To Be Covered By The Media, i.e., Media does not cover all events. In fact it's because media doesn't cover all events that
1459:
There were 6 adopted children. The first 4 adopted children were White and the last 2 were mixed White and Asian. I took a tour of Pearl Buck's house (Green Hills Farm) in Dublin, PA, where I saw pictures of the children and also asked the tour guide about their ancestry.
3224:
I agree that there's some overzealos and often mindless tagging, that is at best not particularly helpful and at worst simply nonsensical. Imho such tagging is actually deteriorating the quality as it irritates readers, sometimes annoys other editors and clogs maintenance
2373:
I believe a very important item in her bio is missing. Under her "Humanitarian" paragraph, there should be mention about the time when Pearl Buck advocated for Israel to spare the life of Adolf Eichmann after he was sentenced to death by hanging as a Nazi War Criminal.
1669:
I dont agree at all. The dispute should be mentioned. Her Nobel Prize was regretted enough for the commitee to create a "lex buck" (which has the purpose to prevent another misstake like her by limiting the prize to people that already have been on the short list before)
2510:
Made edits according to suggestions received, i.e., Shortened AND Provided Citation. I had originally provided documentary television series now I have provided source of information as National Archives of Canada, file name and number. So these edits are good now?
1592:
I am no expert to be sure - but my grandfather did know Buck in China so . . .... so i think that these are biographies that Buck wrote - one, i think of her father or perhaps both parents. The Exile is her dad and the Angel is her Mom - but please check it out.
1745:
He's not quite correcting calling her cheesy, undeserving or unreadable, because that's not quite in line with the facts. Many of her books were bestsellers, so they were obviously readable to many. Her work was enormously influential for the western perception of
2477:
2019:
How are the illustrators of an author's body of work "trivia?" Decide how it should best be sectioned, sure, but to trivialize the relationship between literature, art and illustration and excise these facts from an organic encyclopedia seems a bit extreme.
2795:, please understand that you are wrong to say that "well and thoroughly cited" information has been has been deleted "for no reason other than that the information ... contradicts the descriptions of her work that are more easily perceived as honourable."
2618:
Yes, it seems there is an organised campaign to insert this material, but nobody yet has given any indication that they have examined the sources, or indeed evidence that the sources exist. I will protect this article against editing if this continues.
2346:
I'm in a bit of a hurry, so don't want to spend time figuring out all the formatting for references. There is a recently-discovered novel by Pearl S. Buck, which is due to be published in October this year. I've added that to the article. The source is
3124:
This page needs a fresh crop of Knowledge (XXG) administrators working on it, certainly not all but a good portion aren't well intentioned, aren't informed, aren't capable of doing a good job on the Pearl S Buck page, they are doing more harm than
2564:
By the way, in looking for a reliable source, I spent much more than the ten minutes the visiting administrator did (administrators don't have as much time). If we can find a reliable source, I will be glad to help put it into good Knowledge (XXG)
1390:
Well, I can't think of anyone else who would be called by that name, so my vote would be for a redirect, but if somebody can come up with somebody else who uses that name, then it should be a disambiguation page. See how firmly I take a stand? :)
2666:
have been covered in the press. On the other hand, if it arises from claims to an enquiry that the enquiry did not accept, it must be presented as someone's claim or not at all (depending on the prominence of the accusation), not as a fact.
2200:
When she returned to China until she resigned from the mission board in 1932, she was a missionary, but it hardly seems right that the missionary signboard take up all the space at the side of the page when she was actually so critical.
1785:
Pearl S. Buck International has consistently received "A" ratings from charity watchdog groups, and PSBI receives particularly good marks for its child sponsorship programs, which are judged to be extremely efficient. Examples include:
3001:
Yes, indeed, the article is in fact stublike in the later portions, which a shame, since Peter Conn's biography supplies a lot of material from a well-informed and sympathetic but critical view. I only meant to suggest that we not be
2555:, that is, to a source that is not just one person's testimony. I appreciate that this is burdensome, but would you want Knowledge (XXG) to allow just any information to be added to an article about you or one of your organizations?
1915:
I intentionally put the title "illustrators" on the section, knowing that there were more illustrators than just Maxwell, to avoid POV. If you have references for Cornwell, Sawyers, Clark, Tenggren, et. al., they should be added.
1830:
I almost deleted the Chinese and Pinyan spellings of her name. It would seem obtuse if every English Language Knowledge (XXG) article had the Chinese (and/or other foreign language) representations of people's names in them, as
1804:
The statements about "Pearl S. Buck International coming under fire" run counter to the public perception and those of the nonprofit watchdog community, which is based on audited financial statements and significant oversight.
1753:
While some criticism of her work might be fair or at least arguable, there was plenty of criticism which is rather questionable in retrospective, since it was heavily biased by chauvinistic and ideological attitudes of the
3308:
1859:
The Illustrator of her works is entirely relevant. It is factual, and referenced with the NY Times article. Undid JNW's deletion of this important aspect. Maxwell illustrated works for Pearl S. Buck for nearly 10 years.
2838:
You are now saying that if Pearl S Buck's participation via her Welcome House Adoption Agency in the 60's Scoops, a.k.a., Sixties Scoops, a.k.a., Canada Scoops, in particular her role and that of Welcome House's in the
2153:"With no irony, she has been described in China as a Chinese writer." Shouldn't this sentence just be, "She has been described in China as a Chinese writer"? I don't understand why the "with no irony" part is there.
1749:
Though there might be other authors providing a more realistic picture of life in China in the first half of the 20th century, she's still provided a relatively realistic picture compared to most other writers at the
334:
232:
1716:
All the unsigned comments above are cowardly as well as inappropriate. If you have an axe to grind with PSB's writing, source what supports your argument and edit the article... otherwise go haunt a literature blog.
1410:
Yes, very firmly. But you do relect on the tremendous flexibility of WP. I have just made the redirect, but it can easily be changed later shall Pearl T. Buck be borned a decade from now and be famous 30 years from
1634:
hunman knowledge (Portrait of a marriage). The cruel irony is that she received a Nobel Prize for her American-centric maunderings about China while one of the great writers of the 20th Century, the Chinese master
2986:
Of course, but that does not mean that we should not take the opportunity to see whether the article can be improved in certain areas, and whether it has, or had, a rather too reverential attitude to its subject.
1144:, a collaborative effort to improve Knowledge (XXG)'s coverage of Women in religion. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
2135:
Agreed and made some small changes to wording. Still far from a great article in particular the odd Historic site reference that seems detached. Is this her homestead? If so should it not move slightly up the
79:
3338:
339:
3242:
P.S. I suspect some of that tagging is due to the in appropriate use of tools, probably scanning sections or paragraphs for footnotes and suggesting a tag whenever it doesn't mind sufficiently many.--
2678:
astounding if the House did not assist Canadian and US authorities who had Native American children who required adoption. It's difficult to see how WH, let alone Buck personally, is supposed to be
2741:). I suspect that a pressure group have realised that by latching blame onto someone respected and (moderately) famous like Buck will help to publicise their cause, however tenuous the connection.
2929:
in US papers about Harris's alleged sexuality and financial mismanagement. The main issue seems to be Buck's absurd idolisation of him (he's described by one irreverant source as "her Liberace").
3303:
2814:
have sincerely said, we would be happy to have the information added if it can be properly documented, and in any case, if information is documented, neither my view nor Zero's would matter.
2770:
distributed by Aboriginal People Television Network, both of which were then thoroughly verified as being supported by evidence by United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS).
3333:
2390:"Eichmann immediately petitioned Israeli President Yitzhak Ben-Zvi for clemency. Prominent persons such as Hugo Bergmann, Pearl Buck, Martin Buber, and Ernst Simon spoke up on his behalf."
1175:
3438:
3403:
739:
203:
118:
3163:"China ISP" (whatever that is), there is no way of telling from an IP whether anyone is an investor in "Pearl: The Musical," and.... what!? ... "China ISPs" initiated the Canada Scoops?
588:
1947:
Thank you for your invitation to add others. In the interest of fleshing out a heading you created in a biography on Pearl Buck, you might want to research other illustrators as well.
3288:
1618:
I have both those books around here somewhere , but checked with Carpwoman - and they are biographies of her parents written by her. I'll think about the section headers a bit.
1836:
as to why we are reading Chinese language representations of an American;s name. I will leave it up to the regular contributors to the article to decide if and how to do that.
756:
2105:
By whom? What, exactly, are "things"? And how does this encouragement differ from that provided to most children (of literate families) during their early-education careers?
654:
3378:
3313:
3478:
3343:
2661:
Yes, I entirely agree. Personally I know nothing at all about the subject and have no axe to grind except to enforce the rules of Knowledge (XXG). If a source satisfying
1165:
2730:
Not strictly relevant to this talk page, but there are many wildly exaggerated and unsupported statements about adoption in Canada that have been added to several pages (
2279:
No mention to the movie "The Big Wave (1961)"? Based on the book with the same title, with the production described in the book "A Bridge for Passing" (1961). Or all the
1304:
The long and detailed description of her house (Green Hills) seems like it ought to be on its own web page, linked from here. If there are no objections, I will move it.
1884:
a valid heading, what you have contributed thus far is a start---other prominent artists who illustrated her works included Dean Cornwell, Martha Sawyers, Benton Clark,
644:
1026:
792:
3388:
2810:
2) The information was NOT removed because it contradicted her image. It is absolutely irrelevant whether or not her work can be perceived as honorable. As both I and
1993:
I think the section should be removed entirely. It is not relavent to Pearl S. Buck. This is a biographical article, not a holding place for trivia and pet interests.
549:
444:
315:
2646:
BOTTOM LINE: There is no problem adding a proportionate description of Buck's organizational or personal participation Sixties Scoop if it can be reliably sourced!
1555:
I'm curious as to why she divorced her husband. I read this in an "about the author" from The Good Earth and thought there might be more info in the article here.
3453:
3433:
3413:
3398:
2946:
presented, there is no point in wasting our time repeating our explanations or responding to the same charges. While it is clear that we have followed the policy
2533:
information in testimony given to the commission or in conclusions written by the commission? So far you are quite a bit short of satisfying wikipedia policy on
2306:
That's a great find, please add links—or I will ;-) The novels that were made into films have pages of their own, and the films could be mentioned there as well.
1016:
927:
832:
782:
3278:
2807:, which you really need to read, neither a television program nor a government document qualify, even if there were a reference which allowed others to see them.
2579:
I added some material on the 1960s from Peter Conn's detailed biography and put the Sixties Scoop into another sentence with a "citation needed" tag. Is this OK?
746:
620:
3368:
3358:
3328:
539:
434:
305:
3043:
Since they IP doesn't seem to get it, it might be time to involve an admin for semiprotcting this side and/or admonish the IP and its related fresh accounts.--
2597:. This discusses Welcome House and Sixties Scoop, but does not mention any connection between the two and also does not mention Buck's personal participation.
3373:
1896:, Esther Brock Bird, and William A. Smith. The purpose of an encyclopedia is not to promote particular individuals, and thus far that is the appearance here.
3383:
3205:
someone else saw the book? What is ridiculous about the indiscriminate use of this tag is that Knowledge (XXG) by and large is never cite-checked rigorously
3273:
2476:, which a television report is generally not and 2) I cannot find even this cited source or any other which mentions Buck or her role with Google searches "
2234:
A story on NPR, today, recounts how Chairman Mao's wife banned PSB from Nixon's China Trip by maligning her as an enemy of the Chinese state during China's
3473:
3468:
3463:
3423:
3418:
1569:
Are articles for biographies of Buck really necessary? Just wondering, since I just fixed a link for one, thus creating a red link calling for an article.
2698:
992:
751:
3348:
3180:. Needless to say, the edit was not a deletion. It was a simply a minor change in another part of the article. As CWH says, the deletion was much later
1328:
1140:
1117:
515:
410:
281:
160:
3293:
1685:
611:
572:
937:
1539:
3448:
3428:
3408:
3393:
3318:
3283:
1582:
Pearl Buck, not biographies of her. So they should be in the "Bibliography" section. For actual biographies you should just have a wikified ISBN.
2116:
If no one objects, I'd like to clean up this article in a relatively massive way. I'll check back in about a week, and will begin editing then.
164:
3228:
I can only suggest to fight back. At least I've been removing such obviously questionable or nonsensical tags, whenever I've come across them.--
3363:
3353:
3323:
2737:
reproduction, these young women were subjected to multiple abuses, including sex abuse, forced unpaid labour, and physical and mental torture.
2097:
Buck learned ALL the Chinese "customs" from one person? Did "Mr. Kung" have a bigger name? Or did his close friends just call him "Mr."?
1820:
983:
960:
827:
722:
682:
677:
1247:
2384:
As I'm not an editor (nor an expert on Pearl Buck's life), I thought I'd bring it forward to be discussed among editors on her Wiki page.
506:
467:
401:
362:
272:
227:
1936:
2058:
This is not saying that the illustrator's wouldn't deserve reasonable coverage in articles about the works themselves, but the policy of
159:, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Knowledge (XXG)'s articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
3458:
3443:
3298:
3146:
2403:
2604:, whose posts show that there is a misunderstanding of how Knowledge (XXG) works. I hope that we can restore good faith communication!
1078:
903:
2160:
1467:
734:
168:
1258:
I concur with this comment. How strange to have an article about Pearl Buck that only mentions The Good Earth in the Bibliography.
155:
113:
2036:
3097:
I blocked WV NYC for one week and will block any apparently related accounts making the same edits. This has gone on long enough.
2886:
suggest that if you want to develop content related to this issue then the best approach would be to create a separate article on
1735:
The unknown critic is correct in pointing out that Nobel Prize for Buck was heavily critized and resulted indeed in the so called
3126:
2871:
2516:
2464:
Here's why I cut the paragraph on Buck's role in Sixties Scoop. This would be relevant information, though a little too long and
1332:
730:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
3268:
2716:
explicit requests by other editors, instead he might have tried to get his content into the article by assuming 3 identities.--
2348:
1214:
88:
1375:
Thanks. Do you think we can redirect "Pearl Buck" here? Or make that a disambiguation page? If so, disambiguate from whom? --
619:
and related articles on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1069:
1049:
894:
855:
1494:
I'd be grateful to anyone who can add a few sentences about her adaptation of the classical Chinese story The Water Margin
1742:
He is also correct in pointing out that many critics consider(ed) Buck's writing as shallow or uninteresting for the most.
3060:
I think it is time for ANI, yes, but it is not just an IP. There are two other accounts associated with this individual (
2552:
902:
related articles on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1274:
2804:
2356:
1800:
1486:
The article states that Pearl Buck lived in Zhejiang, while she actually lived in Zhenjiang, Jiangsu province, China.
1681:
1535:
975:
954:
2891:
2067:
1973:
1243:
2059:
1880:
makes it appear as if Maxwell was the only artist who illustrated Buck's works, which was not the case. If this
587:
566:
2025:
1932:
1865:
1677:
94:
3150:
1531:
2407:
2164:
2063:
1969:
1445:
They were mostly of mixed ancestry. She wrote in "Essay of Myself" that most were born of Asian mothers and
2418:
Seven years on, still no mention of her motives in making the appeal. The story makes no sense without it.
2399:
2156:
1924:
1673:
1527:
1463:
1262:
1235:
1202:
3130:
2875:
2520:
2352:
1471:
1061:
1043:
2481:
2021:
1928:
1861:
1514:
3214:
3187:
3112:
Pearl S Buck "Under Fire" - Canada Scoops Victims Placed In USA By Pearl S Buck Welcome House Foundation
3073:
2992:
2934:
2917:
2746:
2706:
2688:
2329:
2296:
2062:
makes it very questionable whether such information belongs in an article about the life of the author.
2040:
1918:
Currently, the passage makes it appear as if Maxwell was the only artist who illustrated Buck's works...
1077:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
991:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
988:
514:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
409:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
280:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1132:
1111:
3065:
2547:
2311:
2248:
1817:
1722:
1356:(currently empty)? I dictionaried it and she is the only famous Buck (note that's a surname here). --
1336:
1239:
819:
714:
20:
2860:
information about Pearl S Buck and her Welcome House Adoption Agency has been explained in the media
1513:"In her Lifetime original series, Pearl S. Buck would write over 100.5 works of literature" huh?? --
1206:
65:
47:
2887:
2847:
of Canada Scoops victims to USA had been verified it would have then been announced in the media;
2235:
1659:
1308:
1210:
498:
393:
264:
2879:
2761:
Pearl S Buck - Canada Scoops Victims Placed In USA By Pearl S Buck's Welcome House Adoption Agency
2469:
1693:
3061:
2792:
2771:
2423:
2241:
2123:
2009:
1985:
1697:
2909:
2137:
2089:
nonsensical. Examples (all from first paragraph, which, I guess, is an example all by itself):
698:
671:
377:
356:
2432:
Seven years is not true. The request was for making a mention in the Humanitarian section, and
193:
2537:. You would actually be better off citing a summary from a newspaper report; can you do that?
1998:
870:
849:
2947:
2601:
3247:
3233:
3210:
3183:
3069:
3048:
3022:
2988:
2977:
2930:
2913:
2908:
If you think there is bias here, then I think the best place to leave a message would be at
2775:
2742:
2721:
2702:
2684:
2264:
2220:
2183:
1813:
argue that it misrepresents her humanitarian contribution. I suggest that it be stricken.
1771:
1644:
1608:
1583:
1570:
1556:
1503:
1450:
1305:
1290:
1270:
616:
147:
2465:
2109:“The streets were alive with rumors- many … based on fact- of brutality to missionaries …”
1832:
801:
2307:
2244:
2141:
1893:
1885:
1718:
2697:
p.s., I came here because I saw that a case regarding this issue that has been opened at
2662:
2478:
Tim Fontaine, Aboriginal Peoples Television Network - APTN, Tim Fontaine, 2012 Pearl Buck
2473:
2951:
2731:
1654:
1619:
1594:
603:
2594:
2534:
3262:
3168:
3098:
3089:
3007:
2959:
2819:
2811:
2667:
2651:
2640:
2620:
2609:
2584:
2570:
2538:
2496:
2485:
2447:
2419:
2325:
2292:
2206:
2119:
2048:
1952:
1901:
1780:
727:
2779:
2177:
The 'irony' thing was fixed. In future, please feel free to make changes yourself. —
2530:
I'm a visiting administrator. You added the citation incorrectly (use <ref: -->
2252:
1994:
1739:(now you have to be shortlisted twice before the Nobel Prize can be awarded to you)
1340:
886:
511:
406:
277:
2851:
information-resources like Knowledge (XXG) became valuable, maintain their value.
2803:
1) The information is not "well and thoroughly cited." As explained in the policy
43:
1845:
The Chinese name and pinyin are appropriate because she is still known in China.
1285:
Well the book has its own article, so most of that will naturally reside there.--
3243:
3229:
3140:
This Page Is More A Public Relations Fact Sheet Than A Periodical Like Reference
3044:
3018:
2973:
2717:
2351:. I'll add the reference to the article later, if nobody else gets there first.
2216:
1767:
1578:
I am confused by the "Biographies" section too. Both the books listed there are
1418:
1376:
1357:
1286:
1266:
2683:
them in. At most this deserves one sentence if a proper citation can be found.
324:
131:
107:
2093:
She was raised in China and learned the customs from a teacher named Mr. Kung.
1889:
1837:
1438:
1392:
1365:
1353:
876:
809:
704:
593:
488:
383:
254:
248:
221:
137:
2387:
Here is sentence in Knowledge (XXG) on that subject on Eichmann's Wiki page:
1795:
258:
3177:
The next edit after he added the text was by an editor with a Chinese name
1758:
enough some Chinese scholars even consider her a "chinese" writer of sorts.
1321:
In 1910, she left for America to attend Randolph-Macon Woman's College , "
726:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
1790:
1603:
3164:
3003:
2955:
2815:
2647:
2605:
2580:
2566:
2492:
2443:
2324:
You do that. Please. :) I'm not confident in my english writing skills --
2202:
2044:
1948:
1897:
1846:
2286:
2280:
3251:
3237:
3218:
3191:
3172:
3154:
3134:
3101:
3092:
3077:
3052:
3026:
3011:
2996:
2981:
2963:
2938:
2921:
2823:
2750:
2725:
2710:
2692:
2670:
2655:
2623:
2613:
2588:
2574:
2541:
2524:
2500:
2451:
2427:
2411:
2360:
2333:
2315:
2300:
2268:
2224:
2210:
2187:
2168:
2145:
2127:
2071:
2052:
2029:
2012:
2002:
1988:
1977:
1956:
1940:
1905:
1869:
1849:
1840:
1809:"redirect" donations to pay for staff salaries (which is not true).
1775:
1726:
1700:
1664:
1647:
1622:
1611:
1597:
1586:
1573:
1559:
1543:
1517:
1475:
1453:
1294:
1278:
1251:
1218:
482:
461:
42:
Graphs are unavailable due to technical issues. There is more info on
1635:
2491:
If anyone can find such a source, please restore a shorter version.
167:. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
1781:
Buck's humanitarianism and her organization coming "under fire"...
1074:
899:
1794:
The American Institute of Philanthropy (As a Top-Rated Charity)
3309:
Unknown-importance biography (arts and entertainment) articles
2912:, which is a noticeboard for discussing issues of neutrality.
2895:
2242:
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=125682489
59:
31:
15:
3088:
It is semi-protected for one month, but it won't help much.
2438:
in 2018. As for motives, someone who has access to the book
1731:
Well a few concluding remarks regarding the comments above:
800:
323:
192:
2593:
I found one source published by New York University Press
2113:
What's with the punctuation here? Not to mention: Huh?
1607:
changed to "Selected Works" or something to that effect?
1504:
http://www.english.upenn.edu/Projects/Buck/biography.html
3339:
Low-importance Christianity in China work group articles
3181:
3178:
2739:
2434:
2215:
Made some minor changes, which I hope are agreeable. --
1364:"Pearl S. Buck" is the name she's generally known by.
1799:"Best in America" at Independent Charities of America
2008:
then maybe document on the talk for future editors.
1502:
Everywhere else I have seen Mr. Kung including here
1073:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
987:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
898:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
615:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
510:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
405:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
276:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
3304:
B-Class biography (arts and entertainment) articles
2900:BTW, I have no particular interest in Buck. I read
2258:
Excellent, thanks for the tip. I will work it in. —
2101:
She was encouraged to write things at an early age.
2043:) 13:59, 29 November 2007 (UTC) Forgot to sign in.
1696:, it would be worth mentioning in a neutral way. --
1984:as it may merit inclusion or prominent placement.
1789:The Better Business Bureau's Wise Giving Alliance
3334:B-Class Christianity in China work group articles
1855:The Illustrator of her works is entirely relevant
3439:B-Class China-related articles of Mid-importance
3404:B-Class United States articles of Low-importance
3289:Knowledge (XXG) level-5 vital articles in People
1692:Can you give a source for that information? If
3068:). And this is not the only article affected.
2699:Knowledge (XXG):Dispute resolution noticeboard
2834:What Hogwash, Or 'White Wash' Is More Like It
2760:
1150:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Women in Religion
8:
2905:Prize from a purely literary point of view.
629:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Women's History
3314:Arts and entertainment work group articles
2238:. This should be worked into the article.
1299:
1106:
1038:
949:
844:
666:
561:
456:
351:
216:
102:
3479:Low-importance Women in Religion articles
3344:Christianity in China work group articles
2894:, which is the name the charity now uses
2833:
1653:was vast and the Nobel was appropriate.
1001:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Women writers
767:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject United States
3279:Knowledge (XXG) vital articles in People
1138:This article is within the scope of the
524:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Philadelphia
419:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Pennsylvania
290:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Christianity
3379:Mid-importance Women's History articles
1604:http://www.kirjasto.sci.fi/pearlbuc.htm
1108:
1040:
951:
846:
668:
563:
458:
353:
218:
104:
63:
3274:Knowledge (XXG) level-5 vital articles
1437:Were the adopted children Chinese? --
1314:The first paragraph doesn't make sense
1153:Template:WikiProject Women in Religion
3454:Top-importance Women writers articles
3434:Mid-importance China-related articles
3414:Mid-importance West Virginia articles
3399:Low-importance United States articles
2843:, actually let's call it like it is,
2484:" 3) Less important, but the article
1490:Water Margin aka All Men Are Brothers
204:the arts and entertainment work group
177:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Biography
7:
3389:WikiProject Women's History articles
3369:Mid-importance Philadelphia articles
3359:Mid-importance Pennsylvania articles
3329:Low-importance Christianity articles
3200:Ridiculous use of "needs cites" tag
2950:(even if they bite us), the article
2366:Pearl Buck & Nazi Adolf Eichmann
1067:This article is within the scope of
981:This article is within the scope of
892:This article is within the scope of
720:This article is within the scope of
632:Template:WikiProject Women's History
609:This article is within the scope of
504:This article is within the scope of
399:This article is within the scope of
270:This article is within the scope of
153:This article is within the scope of
3384:All WikiProject Women-related pages
2442:, pp. 319–20, can try finding out.
1498:Chinese tutor Mr. Kong or Mr. Kung?
3474:B-Class Women in Religion articles
3469:B-Class WikiProject Women articles
3464:WikiProject Women writers articles
3424:WikiProject United States articles
3419:WikiProject West Virginia articles
2230:PSB banned from Nixon's China Trip
1352:Why isn't it ("Pearl S. Buck") at
1004:Template:WikiProject Women writers
770:Template:WikiProject United States
14:
3349:WikiProject Christianity articles
2506:Pearl S Buck Page - Keeping Edits
2084:Immature writing style of article
1523:sense.<bluff city dweller: -->
1482:Error on where she lived in China
1087:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Women
912:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject China
527:Template:WikiProject Philadelphia
422:Template:WikiProject Pennsylvania
293:Template:WikiProject Christianity
3374:B-Class Women's History articles
3294:B-Class vital articles in People
1131:
1110:
1060:
1042:
974:
953:
879:
869:
848:
812:
707:
697:
670:
596:
586:
565:
491:
481:
460:
386:
376:
355:
335:Christianity in China work group
257:
247:
220:
140:
130:
106:
73:
64:
35:
19:
2378:incorporated in her Wiki page.
1170:This article has been rated as
1021:This article has been rated as
932:This article has been rated as
787:This article has been rated as
649:This article has been rated as
544:This article has been rated as
439:This article has been rated as
310:This article has been rated as
3449:B-Class Women writers articles
3429:B-Class China-related articles
3409:B-Class West Virginia articles
3394:B-Class United States articles
3319:WikiProject Biography articles
3284:B-Class level-5 vital articles
2440:Eichmann : his life and crimes
1638:, vanished from Western view.
1623:14:48, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
1612:00:42, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
1598:22:50, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
1587:22:41, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
1574:21:51, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
1454:21:48, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
180:Template:WikiProject Biography
93:It is of interest to multiple
1:
3364:B-Class Philadelphia articles
3354:B-Class Pennsylvania articles
3324:B-Class Christianity articles
2600:My search also found a blog,
2334:00:27, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
2072:14:25, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
2053:14:00, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
2030:12:41, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
2013:00:41, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
2003:23:36, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
1989:23:27, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
1978:23:19, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
1957:17:38, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
1941:14:02, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
1906:02:57, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
1870:20:59, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
1665:11:09, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
1279:04:53, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
1141:Women in Religion WikiProject
1081:and see a list of open tasks.
995:and see a list of open tasks.
906:and see a list of open tasks.
825:This article is supported by
623:and see a list of open tasks.
518:and see a list of open tasks.
413:and see a list of open tasks.
332:This article is supported by
284:and see a list of open tasks.
201:This article is supported by
2412:01:39, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
2316:02:46, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
2301:22:51, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
1701:23:19, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
1648:20:21, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
1544:16:51, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
1252:09:20, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
165:contribute to the discussion
2954:may or may not be relevant.
2892:Pearl S. Buck International
2128:18:44, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
1821:19:59, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
1309:20:35, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
1193:Yet More about "Good Earth"
612:WikiProject Women's History
3495:
3459:WikiProject Women articles
3444:WikiProject China articles
3299:B-Class biography articles
2287:The Big Wave (1961) - IMDb
2229:
2211:04:29, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
1518:04:23, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
1476:14:38, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
1313:
1176:project's importance scale
1156:Women in Religion articles
1093:WikiProject Women articles
1090:Template:WikiProject Women
1027:project's importance scale
938:project's importance scale
915:Template:WikiProject China
793:project's importance scale
655:project's importance scale
550:project's importance scale
445:project's importance scale
316:project's importance scale
3252:22:53, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
3238:22:51, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
3219:15:52, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
3192:04:20, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
3173:23:14, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
3155:12:31, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
3135:11:31, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
3102:11:48, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
3093:13:39, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
3078:13:38, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
3053:13:26, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
3027:22:55, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
3012:18:38, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
2997:09:48, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
2982:00:40, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
2964:22:10, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
2948:Do Not Bite The Newcomers
2939:19:24, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
2269:06:51, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
2253:03:52, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
2225:15:12, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
2188:15:22, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
2169:22:42, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
2146:22:36, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
1850:19:22, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
1841:15:39, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
1727:04:04, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
1441:00:45, 23 Jun 2004 (UTC)
1414:Thank you for your input.
1341:14:04, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
1169:
1126:
1055:
1020:
984:WikiProject Women writers
969:
931:
864:
828:WikiProject West Virginia
808:
786:
723:WikiProject United States
692:
648:
581:
543:
476:
438:
371:
331:
309:
242:
200:
125:
101:
2922:12:40, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
2880:10:39, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
2824:05:22, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
2780:21:52, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
2751:18:31, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
2726:17:41, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
2711:16:38, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
2693:15:49, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
2671:01:45, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
2656:18:15, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
2624:13:02, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
2614:17:41, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
2589:17:20, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
2575:16:31, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
2542:15:01, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
2525:11:45, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
2501:04:03, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
2452:11:03, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
2428:22:11, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
2396:Thank you, C.S. Palmer
2361:10:21, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
2275:The Big Wave - the movie
1776:23:27, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
1560:21:16, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
1360:23:35 29 Jun 2003 (UTC)
1295:09:40, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
1219:01:33, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
728:United States of America
635:Women's History articles
507:WikiProject Philadelphia
402:WikiProject Pennsylvania
273:WikiProject Christianity
1921:suitable referencing.
1379:00:37 30 Jun 2003 (UTC)
1368:00:32 30 Jun 2003 (UTC)
3269:B-Class vital articles
2858:Never mind that this '
2488:does not mention her.
2342:Newly-discovered novel
1833:Knowledge (XXG) is not
1421:01:38 1 Jul 2003 (UTC)
1395:01:31 1 Jul 2003 (UTC)
1300:Let's split off "Home"
1226:More about "Good Earth
1007:Women writers articles
918:China-related articles
805:
773:United States articles
328:
197:
119:Arts and Entertainment
2972:I completely agree.--
1331:comment was added by
804:
530:Philadelphia articles
425:Pennsylvania articles
327:
296:Christianity articles
196:
156:WikiProject Biography
87:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
80:level-5 vital article
1963:Illustrators section
1875:Illustrators, plural
1449:American fathers. --
820:West Virginia portal
715:United States portal
2553:WP:Secondary source
2236:Cultural Revolution
1826:I almost deleted...
1762:publication on PSB.
1688:) 10:35, 11 October
1678:2007 134.105.82.221
741:Articles Requested!
499:Philadelphia portal
394:Pennsylvania portal
265:Christianity portal
3039:Request protection
2805:WP:RELIABLE SOURCE
2602:USA Placed Victims
2595:Briggs & Marre
1532:Bluff city dweller
806:
329:
198:
183:biography articles
89:content assessment
2845:human trafficking
2466:out of proportion
2402:comment added by
2353:Girlwithgreeneyes
2196:PSB A Missionary?
2159:comment added by
1943:
1927:comment added by
1689:
1676:comment added by
1547:
1530:comment added by
1466:comment added by
1344:
1282:
1265:comment added by
1255:
1238:comment added by
1222:
1205:comment added by
1190:
1189:
1186:
1185:
1182:
1181:
1147:Women in Religion
1118:Women in Religion
1105:
1104:
1101:
1100:
1070:WikiProject Women
1037:
1036:
1033:
1032:
948:
947:
944:
943:
895:WikiProject China
843:
842:
839:
838:
665:
664:
661:
660:
560:
559:
556:
555:
455:
454:
451:
450:
350:
349:
346:
345:
215:
214:
211:
210:
58:
57:
54:
53:
3486:
2437:
2414:
2370:Re: Pearl Buck
2262:
2181:
2171:
1922:
1671:
1662:
1657:
1546:
1524:
1478:
1326:
1281:
1259:
1254:
1232:
1221:
1199:
1158:
1157:
1154:
1151:
1148:
1135:
1128:
1127:
1122:
1114:
1107:
1095:
1094:
1091:
1088:
1085:
1064:
1057:
1056:
1046:
1039:
1009:
1008:
1005:
1002:
999:
978:
971:
970:
965:
957:
950:
920:
919:
916:
913:
910:
889:
884:
883:
882:
873:
866:
865:
860:
852:
845:
822:
817:
816:
815:
775:
774:
771:
768:
765:
717:
712:
711:
710:
701:
694:
693:
688:
685:
674:
667:
637:
636:
633:
630:
627:
606:
601:
600:
599:
590:
583:
582:
577:
569:
562:
532:
531:
528:
525:
522:
501:
496:
495:
494:
485:
478:
477:
472:
464:
457:
427:
426:
423:
420:
417:
396:
391:
390:
389:
380:
373:
372:
367:
359:
352:
298:
297:
294:
291:
288:
267:
262:
261:
251:
244:
243:
238:
235:
224:
217:
185:
184:
181:
178:
175:
161:join the project
150:
148:Biography portal
145:
144:
143:
134:
127:
126:
121:
110:
103:
86:
77:
76:
69:
68:
60:
39:
38:
32:
28:Daily page views
23:
16:
3494:
3493:
3489:
3488:
3487:
3485:
3484:
3483:
3259:
3258:
3202:
3142:
3114:
3066:User:USS SF NYC
3041:
2836:
2763:
2531:..</ref: -->
2508:
2474:reliable source
2462:
2433:
2397:
2368:
2344:
2277:
2260:
2232:
2198:
2179:
2154:
2086:
2060:WP:Undue weight
1965:
1913:
1894:Charles Hargens
1886:Gustaf Tenggren
1877:
1857:
1828:
1783:
1660:
1655:
1631:
1567:
1553:
1525:
1511:
1509:Weird Sentence?
1500:
1492:
1484:
1461:
1435:
1350:
1327:—The preceding
1316:
1302:
1260:
1240:Jenny Ice Cream
1233:
1228:
1200:
1195:
1155:
1152:
1149:
1146:
1145:
1120:
1092:
1089:
1086:
1083:
1082:
1006:
1003:
1000:
997:
996:
963:
917:
914:
911:
908:
907:
885:
880:
878:
858:
818:
813:
811:
772:
769:
766:
763:
762:
761:
747:Become a Member
713:
708:
706:
686:
680:
634:
631:
628:
626:Women's History
625:
624:
617:Women's history
602:
597:
595:
575:
573:Women's History
529:
526:
523:
520:
519:
497:
492:
490:
470:
424:
421:
418:
415:
414:
392:
387:
385:
365:
295:
292:
289:
286:
285:
263:
256:
236:
230:
182:
179:
176:
173:
172:
146:
141:
139:
116:
84:
74:
36:
30:
12:
11:
5:
3492:
3490:
3482:
3481:
3476:
3471:
3466:
3461:
3456:
3451:
3446:
3441:
3436:
3431:
3426:
3421:
3416:
3411:
3406:
3401:
3396:
3391:
3386:
3381:
3376:
3371:
3366:
3361:
3356:
3351:
3346:
3341:
3336:
3331:
3326:
3321:
3316:
3311:
3306:
3301:
3296:
3291:
3286:
3281:
3276:
3271:
3261:
3260:
3257:
3256:
3255:
3254:
3226:
3201:
3198:
3197:
3196:
3195:
3194:
3175:
3141:
3138:
3113:
3110:
3109:
3108:
3107:
3106:
3105:
3104:
3083:
3082:
3081:
3080:
3040:
3037:
3036:
3035:
3034:
3033:
3032:
3031:
3030:
3029:
2984:
2967:
2966:
2952:Internet troll
2942:
2941:
2925:
2924:
2906:
2902:The Good Earth
2898:
2835:
2832:
2831:
2830:
2829:
2828:
2827:
2826:
2808:
2801:
2800:
2799:
2762:
2759:
2758:
2757:
2756:
2755:
2754:
2753:
2732:Baby Scoop Era
2695:
2674:
2673:
2637:
2636:
2635:
2634:
2633:
2632:
2631:
2630:
2629:
2628:
2627:
2626:
2559:
2558:
2557:
2556:
2507:
2504:
2461:
2458:
2457:
2456:
2455:
2454:
2393:
2367:
2364:
2343:
2340:
2339:
2338:
2337:
2336:
2319:
2318:
2276:
2273:
2272:
2271:
2231:
2228:
2197:
2194:
2193:
2192:
2191:
2190:
2151:
2150:
2149:
2148:
2085:
2082:
2081:
2080:
2079:
2078:
2077:
2076:
2075:
2074:
2022:Rocketsquirrel
2017:
2016:
2015:
1964:
1961:
1960:
1959:
1929:Rocketsquirrel
1912:
1909:
1876:
1873:
1862:Rocketsquirrel
1856:
1853:
1827:
1824:
1782:
1779:
1764:
1763:
1759:
1755:
1751:
1747:
1743:
1740:
1710:
1709:
1708:
1707:
1706:
1705:
1704:
1703:
1630:
1627:
1626:
1625:
1616:
1615:
1614:
1566:
1563:
1552:
1549:
1515:216.165.11.242
1510:
1507:
1499:
1496:
1491:
1488:
1483:
1480:
1457:
1456:
1434:
1431:
1430:
1429:
1428:
1427:
1426:
1425:
1424:
1423:
1422:
1415:
1412:
1401:
1400:
1399:
1398:
1397:
1396:
1383:
1382:
1381:
1380:
1370:
1369:
1349:
1346:
1315:
1312:
1301:
1298:
1227:
1224:
1194:
1191:
1188:
1187:
1184:
1183:
1180:
1179:
1172:Low-importance
1168:
1162:
1161:
1159:
1136:
1124:
1123:
1121:Low‑importance
1115:
1103:
1102:
1099:
1098:
1096:
1079:the discussion
1065:
1053:
1052:
1047:
1035:
1034:
1031:
1030:
1023:Top-importance
1019:
1013:
1012:
1010:
993:the discussion
979:
967:
966:
964:Top‑importance
958:
946:
945:
942:
941:
934:Mid-importance
930:
924:
923:
921:
904:the discussion
891:
890:
874:
862:
861:
859:Mid‑importance
853:
841:
840:
837:
836:
833:Mid-importance
824:
823:
807:
797:
796:
789:Low-importance
785:
779:
778:
776:
760:
759:
754:
749:
744:
737:
735:Template Usage
731:
719:
718:
702:
690:
689:
687:Low‑importance
675:
663:
662:
659:
658:
651:Mid-importance
647:
641:
640:
638:
621:the discussion
608:
607:
604:History portal
591:
579:
578:
576:Mid‑importance
570:
558:
557:
554:
553:
546:Mid-importance
542:
536:
535:
533:
516:the discussion
503:
502:
486:
474:
473:
471:Mid‑importance
465:
453:
452:
449:
448:
441:Mid-importance
437:
431:
430:
428:
411:the discussion
398:
397:
381:
369:
368:
366:Mid‑importance
360:
348:
347:
344:
343:
340:Low-importance
330:
320:
319:
312:Low-importance
308:
302:
301:
299:
282:the discussion
269:
268:
252:
240:
239:
237:Low‑importance
225:
213:
212:
209:
208:
199:
189:
188:
186:
152:
151:
135:
123:
122:
111:
99:
98:
92:
70:
56:
55:
52:
51:
40:
26:
24:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
3491:
3480:
3477:
3475:
3472:
3470:
3467:
3465:
3462:
3460:
3457:
3455:
3452:
3450:
3447:
3445:
3442:
3440:
3437:
3435:
3432:
3430:
3427:
3425:
3422:
3420:
3417:
3415:
3412:
3410:
3407:
3405:
3402:
3400:
3397:
3395:
3392:
3390:
3387:
3385:
3382:
3380:
3377:
3375:
3372:
3370:
3367:
3365:
3362:
3360:
3357:
3355:
3352:
3350:
3347:
3345:
3342:
3340:
3337:
3335:
3332:
3330:
3327:
3325:
3322:
3320:
3317:
3315:
3312:
3310:
3307:
3305:
3302:
3300:
3297:
3295:
3292:
3290:
3287:
3285:
3282:
3280:
3277:
3275:
3272:
3270:
3267:
3266:
3264:
3253:
3249:
3245:
3241:
3240:
3239:
3235:
3231:
3227:
3223:
3222:
3221:
3220:
3216:
3212:
3208:
3199:
3193:
3189:
3185:
3182:
3179:
3176:
3174:
3170:
3166:
3161:
3160:
3159:
3158:
3157:
3156:
3152:
3148:
3147:64.134.240.40
3139:
3137:
3136:
3132:
3128:
3122:
3118:
3111:
3103:
3100:
3096:
3095:
3094:
3091:
3087:
3086:
3085:
3084:
3079:
3075:
3071:
3067:
3063:
3059:
3058:
3057:
3056:
3055:
3054:
3050:
3046:
3038:
3028:
3024:
3020:
3015:
3014:
3013:
3009:
3005:
3000:
2999:
2998:
2994:
2990:
2985:
2983:
2979:
2975:
2971:
2970:
2969:
2968:
2965:
2961:
2957:
2953:
2949:
2944:
2943:
2940:
2936:
2932:
2927:
2926:
2923:
2919:
2915:
2911:
2907:
2903:
2899:
2896:
2893:
2889:
2888:Welcome House
2884:
2883:
2882:
2881:
2877:
2873:
2867:
2863:
2861:
2856:
2852:
2848:
2846:
2842:
2825:
2821:
2817:
2813:
2809:
2806:
2802:
2797:
2796:
2794:
2791:
2788:
2787:
2786:
2785:
2784:
2783:
2782:
2781:
2777:
2773:
2767:
2752:
2748:
2744:
2740:
2738:
2733:
2729:
2728:
2727:
2723:
2719:
2714:
2713:
2712:
2708:
2704:
2700:
2696:
2694:
2690:
2686:
2681:
2676:
2675:
2672:
2669:
2664:
2660:
2659:
2658:
2657:
2653:
2649:
2644:
2642:
2625:
2622:
2617:
2616:
2615:
2611:
2607:
2603:
2599:
2598:
2596:
2592:
2591:
2590:
2586:
2582:
2578:
2577:
2576:
2572:
2568:
2563:
2562:
2561:
2560:
2554:
2549:
2545:
2544:
2543:
2540:
2536:
2535:verifiability
2529:
2528:
2527:
2526:
2522:
2518:
2512:
2505:
2503:
2502:
2498:
2494:
2489:
2487:
2486:Sixties Scoop
2483:
2479:
2475:
2471:
2467:
2460:Sixties Scoop
2459:
2453:
2449:
2445:
2441:
2436:
2435:that was done
2431:
2430:
2429:
2425:
2421:
2417:
2416:
2415:
2413:
2409:
2405:
2404:72.241.99.178
2401:
2394:
2391:
2388:
2385:
2382:
2379:
2375:
2371:
2365:
2363:
2362:
2358:
2354:
2350:
2341:
2335:
2331:
2327:
2323:
2322:
2321:
2320:
2317:
2313:
2309:
2305:
2304:
2303:
2302:
2298:
2294:
2289:
2288:
2284:
2282:
2274:
2270:
2267:
2266:
2257:
2256:
2255:
2254:
2250:
2246:
2243:
2239:
2237:
2227:
2226:
2222:
2218:
2213:
2212:
2208:
2204:
2195:
2189:
2186:
2185:
2176:
2175:
2174:
2173:
2172:
2170:
2166:
2162:
2158:
2147:
2143:
2139:
2134:
2133:
2132:
2131:
2130:
2129:
2125:
2121:
2117:
2114:
2111:
2110:
2106:
2103:
2102:
2098:
2095:
2094:
2090:
2083:
2073:
2069:
2065:
2061:
2056:
2055:
2054:
2050:
2046:
2042:
2038:
2033:
2032:
2031:
2027:
2023:
2018:
2014:
2011:
2006:
2005:
2004:
2000:
1996:
1992:
1991:
1990:
1987:
1982:
1981:
1980:
1979:
1975:
1971:
1962:
1958:
1954:
1950:
1946:
1945:
1944:
1942:
1938:
1934:
1930:
1926:
1919:
1911:Then add them
1910:
1908:
1907:
1903:
1899:
1895:
1891:
1887:
1883:
1874:
1872:
1871:
1867:
1863:
1854:
1852:
1851:
1848:
1843:
1842:
1839:
1834:
1825:
1823:
1822:
1819:
1814:
1810:
1806:
1802:
1801:
1797:
1796:
1792:
1791:
1787:
1778:
1777:
1773:
1769:
1760:
1756:
1752:
1748:
1744:
1741:
1738:
1734:
1733:
1732:
1729:
1728:
1724:
1720:
1714:
1702:
1699:
1698:Foggy Morning
1695:
1691:
1690:
1687:
1683:
1679:
1675:
1668:
1667:
1666:
1663:
1658:
1651:
1650:
1649:
1646:
1641:
1640:
1639:
1637:
1628:
1624:
1621:
1617:
1613:
1610:
1605:
1602:From target:
1601:
1600:
1599:
1596:
1591:
1590:
1589:
1588:
1585:
1581:
1576:
1575:
1572:
1564:
1562:
1561:
1558:
1550:
1548:
1545:
1541:
1537:
1533:
1529:
1520:
1519:
1516:
1508:
1506:
1505:
1497:
1495:
1489:
1487:
1481:
1479:
1477:
1473:
1469:
1465:
1455:
1452:
1448:
1444:
1443:
1442:
1440:
1432:
1420:
1416:
1413:
1409:
1408:
1407:
1406:
1405:
1404:
1403:
1402:
1394:
1389:
1388:
1387:
1386:
1385:
1384:
1378:
1374:
1373:
1372:
1371:
1367:
1363:
1362:
1361:
1359:
1355:
1347:
1345:
1342:
1338:
1334:
1330:
1322:
1319:
1311:
1310:
1307:
1297:
1296:
1292:
1288:
1283:
1280:
1276:
1272:
1268:
1264:
1256:
1253:
1249:
1245:
1241:
1237:
1225:
1223:
1220:
1216:
1212:
1208:
1204:
1192:
1177:
1173:
1167:
1164:
1163:
1160:
1143:
1142:
1137:
1134:
1130:
1129:
1125:
1119:
1116:
1113:
1109:
1097:
1080:
1076:
1072:
1071:
1066:
1063:
1059:
1058:
1054:
1051:
1048:
1045:
1041:
1028:
1024:
1018:
1015:
1014:
1011:
998:Women writers
994:
990:
989:women writers
986:
985:
980:
977:
973:
972:
968:
962:
961:Women writers
959:
956:
952:
939:
935:
929:
926:
925:
922:
905:
901:
897:
896:
888:
877:
875:
872:
868:
867:
863:
857:
854:
851:
847:
834:
831:(assessed as
830:
829:
821:
810:
803:
799:
798:
794:
790:
784:
781:
780:
777:
764:United States
758:
755:
753:
750:
748:
745:
743:
742:
738:
736:
733:
732:
729:
725:
724:
716:
705:
703:
700:
696:
695:
691:
684:
683:West Virginia
679:
678:United States
676:
673:
669:
656:
652:
646:
643:
642:
639:
622:
618:
614:
613:
605:
594:
592:
589:
585:
584:
580:
574:
571:
568:
564:
551:
547:
541:
538:
537:
534:
517:
513:
509:
508:
500:
489:
487:
484:
480:
479:
475:
469:
466:
463:
459:
446:
442:
436:
433:
432:
429:
412:
408:
404:
403:
395:
384:
382:
379:
375:
374:
370:
364:
361:
358:
354:
341:
338:(assessed as
337:
336:
326:
322:
321:
317:
313:
307:
304:
303:
300:
283:
279:
275:
274:
266:
260:
255:
253:
250:
246:
245:
241:
234:
229:
226:
223:
219:
206:
205:
195:
191:
190:
187:
170:
169:documentation
166:
162:
158:
157:
149:
138:
136:
133:
129:
128:
124:
120:
115:
112:
109:
105:
100:
96:
90:
82:
81:
71:
67:
62:
61:
49:
48:MediaWiki.org
45:
41:
34:
33:
29:
25:
22:
18:
17:
3207:for anything
3206:
3203:
3143:
3123:
3119:
3115:
3042:
2901:
2868:
2864:
2859:
2857:
2853:
2849:
2844:
2840:
2837:
2789:
2768:
2764:
2735:
2679:
2645:
2638:
2513:
2509:
2490:
2463:
2439:
2398:— Preceding
2395:
2392:
2389:
2386:
2383:
2380:
2376:
2372:
2369:
2345:
2290:
2285:
2281:other movies
2278:
2259:
2240:
2233:
2214:
2199:
2178:
2161:75.36.209.39
2152:
2118:
2115:
2112:
2108:
2107:
2104:
2100:
2099:
2096:
2092:
2091:
2087:
1966:
1917:
1914:
1881:
1878:
1858:
1844:
1829:
1815:
1811:
1807:
1803:
1798:
1793:
1788:
1784:
1765:
1736:
1730:
1715:
1711:
1632:
1629:Undeserving?
1579:
1577:
1568:
1554:
1526:— Preceding
1521:
1512:
1501:
1493:
1485:
1468:199.43.32.85
1458:
1446:
1436:
1351:
1323:
1320:
1317:
1303:
1284:
1257:
1229:
1196:
1171:
1139:
1068:
1022:
982:
933:
893:
887:China portal
826:
788:
752:Project Talk
740:
721:
650:
610:
545:
521:Philadelphia
512:Philadelphia
505:
468:Philadelphia
440:
416:Pennsylvania
407:Pennsylvania
400:
363:Pennsylvania
333:
311:
287:Christianity
278:Christianity
271:
228:Christianity
202:
154:
95:WikiProjects
78:
27:
3211:AnthroMimus
3062:User:WV NYC
3002:distracted.
2890:or perhaps
2798:Here's why:
2155:—Preceding
2064:John Carter
2037:69.37.21.94
1970:John Carter
1923:—Preceding
1672:—Preceding
1645:QueenStupid
1609:QueenStupid
1584:Dark Formal
1571:QueenStupid
1557:67.76.228.3
1462:—Preceding
1451:QueenStupid
1306:Dark Formal
1261:—Preceding
1234:—Preceding
1201:—Preceding
44:Phabricator
3263:Categories
3127:4.35.92.19
2872:4.35.92.19
2548:4.35.92.19
2546:Thanks to
2517:4.35.92.19
2468:, but 1)
1890:Kurt Werth
1818:ChrisLeyda
1694:verifiable
1354:Pearl Buck
1333:66.82.9.41
1325:anonymouse
2639:* Thanks
2482:Find Link
2472:requires
2470:WP:Verify
2308:LittleBen
1656:Athaenara
1620:Carptrash
1595:Carptrash
1565:Biography
1207:Sleetacon
174:Biography
114:Biography
83:is rated
2910:WP:NPOVN
2812:Zero0000
2641:Zero0000
2420:Valetude
2400:unsigned
2326:Cesarakg
2293:Cesarakg
2157:unsigned
2120:Sugarbat
2010:Benjiboi
1986:Benjiboi
1937:contribs
1925:unsigned
1737:Lex Buck
1686:contribs
1674:unsigned
1540:contribs
1528:unsigned
1464:unsigned
1433:Adoption
1329:unsigned
1275:contribs
1263:unsigned
1248:contribs
1236:unsigned
1215:contribs
1203:unsigned
3225:queues.
2841:transit
2790:Comment
2136:page?--
1995:Kaldari
1551:Divorce
1174:on the
1025:on the
936:on the
791:on the
653:on the
548:on the
443:on the
314:on the
85:B-class
46:and on
3244:Kmhkmh
3230:Kmhkmh
3184:Paul B
3070:Paul B
3045:Kmhkmh
3019:Kmhkmh
2989:Paul B
2974:Kmhkmh
2931:Paul B
2914:Paul B
2793:WV NYC
2772:WV NYC
2743:Paul B
2718:Kmhkmh
2703:Paul B
2685:Paul B
2680:blamed
2480:" or "
2261:Zujine
2245:Buster
2217:Zujine
2180:Zujine
1768:Kmhkmh
1746:China.
1719:Buster
1636:Lu Xun
1447:mostly
1419:Menchi
1377:Menchi
1358:Menchi
1287:Kmhkmh
1267:Lafong
1231:you.
757:Alerts
91:scale.
3125:good.
2663:WP:RS
2565:form.
2138:Vagon
1838:Jerry
1754:time.
1750:time.
1439:Error
1393:RickK
1366:RickK
1348:Move?
1084:Women
1075:women
1050:Women
909:China
900:China
856:China
233:China
72:This
3248:talk
3234:talk
3215:talk
3188:talk
3169:talk
3151:talk
3131:talk
3099:Zero
3090:Zero
3074:talk
3064:and
3049:talk
3023:talk
3008:talk
2993:talk
2978:talk
2960:talk
2935:talk
2918:talk
2876:talk
2820:talk
2776:talk
2747:talk
2722:talk
2707:talk
2689:talk
2668:Zero
2652:talk
2621:Zero
2610:talk
2585:talk
2571:talk
2539:Zero
2521:talk
2497:talk
2448:talk
2424:talk
2408:talk
2357:talk
2349:here
2330:talk
2312:talk
2297:talk
2265:talk
2249:talk
2221:talk
2207:talk
2184:talk
2165:talk
2142:talk
2124:talk
2068:talk
2049:talk
2041:talk
2026:talk
1999:talk
1974:talk
1953:talk
1933:talk
1902:talk
1866:talk
1772:talk
1723:talk
1682:talk
1661:talk
1536:talk
1472:talk
1411:now.
1337:talk
1291:talk
1271:talk
1244:talk
1211:talk
163:and
2444:Jay
2045:JNW
1949:JNW
1898:JNW
1847:cwh
1166:Low
1017:Top
928:Mid
783:Low
645:Mid
540:Mid
435:Mid
306:Low
3265::
3250:)
3236:)
3217:)
3190:)
3171:)
3165:ch
3153:)
3133:)
3076:)
3051:)
3025:)
3010:)
3004:ch
2995:)
2980:)
2962:)
2956:ch
2937:)
2920:)
2878:)
2822:)
2816:ch
2778:)
2749:)
2734::
2724:)
2709:)
2691:)
2654:)
2648:ch
2612:)
2606:ch
2587:)
2581:ch
2573:)
2567:ch
2523:)
2499:)
2493:ch
2450:)
2426:)
2410:)
2359:)
2332:)
2314:)
2299:)
2291:--
2283:?
2251:)
2223:)
2209:)
2203:ch
2167:)
2144:)
2126:)
2070:)
2051:)
2028:)
2020:--
2001:)
1976:)
1955:)
1939:)
1935:•
1904:)
1892:,
1888:,
1882:is
1868:)
1860:--
1816:--
1774:)
1766:--
1725:)
1684:•
1580:by
1542:)
1538:•
1474:)
1417:--
1339:)
1293:)
1277:)
1273:•
1250:)
1246:•
1217:)
1213:•
835:).
681::
342:).
231::
117::
3246:(
3232:(
3213:(
3186:(
3167:(
3149:(
3129:(
3072:(
3047:(
3021:(
3006:(
2991:(
2976:(
2958:(
2933:(
2916:(
2874:(
2818:(
2774:(
2745:(
2720:(
2705:(
2687:(
2650:(
2608:(
2583:(
2569:(
2519:(
2495:(
2446:(
2422:(
2406:(
2355:(
2328:(
2310:(
2295:(
2263:|
2247:(
2219:(
2205:(
2182:|
2163:(
2140:(
2122:(
2066:(
2047:(
2039:(
2024:(
1997:(
1972:(
1951:(
1931:(
1900:(
1864:(
1770:(
1721:(
1680:(
1534:(
1470:(
1343:.
1335:(
1289:(
1269:(
1242:(
1209:(
1178:.
1029:.
940:.
795:.
657:.
552:.
447:.
318:.
207:.
171:.
97:.
50:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.