838:, Haeckel's model inspired Dutch scientist Eugène Dubois to join the Dutch East India Company and search for his "missing link" in Java. He found a skullcap and a femur (Java Man) which he named "P. erectus" (using Haeckel's hypothetical genus name) and unfruitfully attempted to convince the European scientific community that he had found an upright-walking ape-man dating to the late Pliocene or early Pleistocene, who dismissed his findings as some kind of malformed non-human ape. Dejected, Dubois fully withdrew from anthropology by the turn of the century.
1401:
42:
1337:
The images add a lot to the article. They also all look good copyright-wise, with one exception: the file File:Sculpture of Peking Man at the
Zhoukoudian Museum.jpg has been proposed for deletion under China's copyright laws. Take a look at the deletion discussion page – it seems like it's been going
1287:
I think this is a definite go. A lot of interesting parts of the subject area are addressed, including the fossil's relationship with the political landscape of the time. In the future, I think it would be nice to expand the info about this fossils relationship with the Mao era to a separate section,
1039:
As mentioned above: the word "preponderance" is not used correctly at the beginning of the second paragraph of the "stone tools" section, and after the "Location of the
Zhoukoudian" map. Responding to your comment above, to make this more clear you should at least say "preponderance compared to other
943:
I think that I will make my feedback a little bit less general, so that it's easier for you to bring this article to the finish line. It's okay to use big words in places, but there are a few specific instances throughout the text where word choice really gets in the way of comprehension. I've listed
820:
True – again, I think I'm misusing the idea of a "technical" word here. It's more that the word choice here tends to make it seem harder to read than necessary, especially since this is a topic that could appeal to a wide audience. As an example, here are the first few lines with a few changes that I
526:
For the most part, the writing style here is good. However, I think that it can be a bit too technical in places. Some sections, like the ones on "anatomy" and "taphonomy" are technical in nature and so that kind of tone is appropriate, but the ones on the history of the fossils should be written in
871:
Yeah – I agree that a lot of these words are commonly understood, but they just might not be great for the flow of the article. Even if readers know what a word means, replacing simple words with longer ones will just make the piece harder to read. As a general rule, there's nothing wrong with the
886:
Just a note, in some instances the big word has an implication that you might not be applying properly. For example "preponderance" doesn't mean "large number" it means an excess or majority in relation to something else. The use is fine in "the preponderance of skulls compared to body remains is
683:
It's a composite of all the known materials of similar age and sex, and then you fill in the gaps based on what you have and what you expect to be there. You can't make plaster casts of bones that don't exist, and you can't make those kinds of computer models with 20th century technology
1256:
With these five changes, I think that I will be able to promote the article. I'm replacing these words not because their too technical but because they weren't used properly according to their definitions. Let me know if you have any questions, or if there's anything I can do to help!
887:
conspicuous," but "The site has yielded a preponderance of stone tools" and "with a preponderance of human remains, stone tools, and potential evidence of early fire use" the usage seems to be more "large number" as opposed to "more of these than other items," which is imprecise. —
567:
I'm still confused on the kinds of words I'm allowed to use. Is robust too much, or exorbitant, or protrusive? Am I only allowed to say "a lot"? You also have issues with postulate which is certainly a commonly understood word. Are circumscription and ubiquitous too much?
829:
dispersal routes throughout the world. Among the latter was Ernst
Haeckel who argued that the first human species (which he proactively named "Homo primigenius") evolved on the now-disproven hypothetical continent "Lemuria" in what is now Southeast Asia, from a genus he
1012:
If you're not willing to change it, I'll leave it for now – as a whole, the article is still good enough to be promoted. Still, some of this language will need to be changed in the future if the article is promoted to a higher class.
1379:
I think I will put this one on a standard 7-day hold for now, to give you time to make the writing more clear and fix the situation with the image. Other than that, I think the article is almost ready to be promoted – great work!
782:
I'm going to stop leaving comments on clarity for now, since it seems like there are a lot of places where this applies, but try to generally clean up as many sentences as possible where unnecessarily technical language is
794:
rule, the ideal would be to phrase these sections in a way that a secondary school student could understand. I don't think you need to totally rewrite these sections, just change some words or phrases to make it more
841:
I know this is a lot, but I'm guessing it's the last substantial suggestion I'll make for this review. Just go through and try to change as many words as you can to make it accessible to a broader range of readers.
675:
At the beginning of the "Skull" section: could you be more specific about what you mean by "constructing" a skull? Did they just construct it with computer modeling or make plaster casts to fill in the missing
802:
there shouldn't be anything truly technical at all in
Classification, there's just a lot of context necessary and I wasn't sure how much I was supposed to explain (and it's already very large as it is)
334:
The line supported by ref 79 ("Men hung and women gather"), isn't supported by the given source as far as I can tell. Let me know if I am missing something, or if you just used the wrong citation.
1338:
on for a while – and if it hasn't been resolved, we might just need to get rid of the image. We could always take the image out temporarily and add it back in later if the copyvio is resolved.
1080:
removed but I still disagree. All descriptors are relative and are implied what it's in relation to. When I say the skull is long, it's implied long compared to modern humans and not horses
294:
The first few sentences in the "Age and taphonomy" section aren't written very clearly, and you should probably "taphonomy" to something like "fossil remnants" to make it less technical.
1329:
I think this one is okay as well, besides the nitpick I made above – even when discussing censorship under communism, which is a difficult topic, the article seems fairly balanced.
583:
See my comment below – again, it's not that the words themselves are too much, it's just that you could easily replace them with simpler language to make the piece easier to read.
1407:. I still think there are some issues with the wording that deserve to be fixed in the future, but for now it is fair to say that the article meets the GAN criteria.
193:
actually, I'm sorry – I just realized I don't have access to all of the sources I need to edit this article. Is there a way for me to undo signing up for the review?
80:
872:
words you mentioned in and of themselves, but if you could replace them with a shorter word without losing any meaning you probably should. Does that make sense?
1159:
True, but this word also carries a dramatic connotation that I don't think is appropriate. Honestly, the sentence would flow fine if you just took the word out.
925:, that may be your intent, if you mean there are more of these items in this one site than in all others worldwide, but it's not what the sentences are saying. —
790:
To be more specific, I feel like almost all of the problems in this regard are found in the "Classification" subsection and the "anatomy" section. Following the
553:
I think "technical" was the wrong term to use – it just makes it read more densely than it needs to when you could just say "there are many human remains ..."
70:
449:"Period of stability" wouldn't be bad – I'm not trying to underplay the effects that Chinese politics had on science, but the original version wasn't NPOV.
856:
So you just want me to be less grandiloquent? I feel that words like term, preponderance, nevertheless, postulate, etc should be commonly understood words
1066:
Got it, that's fair enough for the use of the word after the map. However, do you mind still fixing the other occurrence (in the "stone tools" section)?
47:
997:
I still don't think dearth is the best since it could also mean a total lack, whereas paucity very clearly is defined as hardly any but still something
825:
that Asia (instead of Africa) was the birthplace of humankind as it is midway between all continents via land routes or short sea crossings, providing
821:
think would improve it: Despite what
Charles Darwin had hypothesised in his 1871 Descent of Man, many late-19th century evolutionary naturalists
341:
It says on p. 152, "The more detailed depictions of life in Peking Man's time generally followed the notion that 'men hunt and women gather.'"
268:
In the "Research history" section, the line "Unfortunately, the ship was attacked by
Japanese warships..." seems to be kind of editorializing.
752:
In the first sentence of the "postcranium" section, the word choice "derisory" isn't very clear and I'm not sure it's the right word to use.
370:
It's the same link I sent you. When I say page 152, I mean it's marked as 152 on the actual document, not the slider system to the left
156:
126:
52:
834:"Pithecanthropus" ("ape-man"). "Lemuria" had supposedly sunk below the Indian Ocean, so no fossils could be found to prove this.
122:
949:"Paucity," near the end of the third paragraph of the "classification" section, should be replaced with something like "dearth."
962:
I just thought that dearth would actually be a little bit more specific here, since it specifically means a lack of something.
75:
107:
531:"the Zhoukoudian proved to be a valuable site, with a preponderance of human remains," preponderance should be replaced.
518:
I just finished going through the document, and other than the nitpicks I discussed above it looks good on that front.
99:
427:
and the
Cultural Revolution" (and Cultural revolution should be WikiLinked) at the end of the "Stone tools" section
1348:
1298:
1227:
1183:
1150:
1086:
1057:
1003:
913:
862:
809:
719:
699:
Got it, thanks. It would be nice if you could WikiLink that to an appropriate article if there is one, though.
690:
662:
620:
574:
544:
527:
a way that the general reader could understand. Here are some places that should probably be made more clear:
501:
469:
440:
406:
376:
347:
307:
281:
223:
177:
1412:
1385:
1362:
1314:
1262:
1241:
1197:
1164:
1119:
1071:
1018:
988:
967:
877:
847:
767:
733:
704:
634:
588:
558:
454:
361:
321:
244:
198:
150:
1192:
It's just surprising given the tone of the sentence, but I guess that this one is okay to stay for now.
1309:
Fair enough – like I said, this is more of a loose suggestion than something that needs to be changed.
1342:
I started that discussion. Chinese copyright law got amended just last year, so the photo is fine now
1101:
The word "prolific," used just before the start of the "society" section, isn't used correctly either.
1114:
All right – I'm still not sure that it's great for flow, but I guess that I can let this one slide.
649:
At the end in the first paragraph in
Anatomy, the expression "in sensu lato" isn't really necessary.
356:
We must just be working from different drafts, but it's okay as long as it's supported by the text.
1344:
1294:
1223:
1179:
1146:
1082:
1053:
999:
978:
922:
909:
858:
805:
715:
686:
658:
616:
570:
540:
497:
465:
436:
402:
372:
343:
303:
277:
234:
219:
188:
173:
1408:
1381:
1358:
1310:
1258:
1237:
1193:
1160:
1141:
exorbitant: exceeding the customary or appropriate limits in intensity, quality, amount, or size
1115:
1067:
1014:
984:
963:
873:
843:
763:
729:
700:
630:
584:
554:
450:
424:
357:
317:
240:
209:
194:
146:
1288:
so it is more clearly organized, but I don't think this is essential to meet the GA criteria.
791:
957:
930:
892:
115:
17:
351:
1142:
214:
If it's the People's Peking Man, you can see the before-peer-review version on proquest
505:
444:
311:
285:
1109:
1214:
Finally, "amalgamations," used at the beginning of the "Paleoenvironment" section.
395:
It also doesn't seem like you gave a citation for the "Problems of
Leninism quote"
1292:
is it not already? Actual Maoist ideology is only really talked about in
Society
1134:
Same with "exorbitant," used in the first paragraph of the "postcranium" section.
926:
888:
538:
Should I replace preponderance elsewhere? It's not like it's a technical word
484:
The first sentence in the second paragraph of "Classification": it should be "
92:
215:
1416:
1389:
1366:
1352:
1318:
1302:
1266:
1245:
1231:
1201:
1187:
1168:
1154:
1123:
1090:
1075:
1061:
1022:
1007:
992:
971:
934:
917:
896:
881:
866:
851:
813:
771:
737:
723:
708:
694:
666:
638:
624:
592:
578:
562:
548:
473:
458:
410:
380:
365:
325:
248:
227:
202:
181:
160:
607:
The first sentence in the Classification section is a bit of a run-on.
1051:
site in the world" this makes "compared to other sites" redundant
903:
Certainly it is a preponderance of these items compared to other
728:
Okay – if there's no article on it, maybe this one's fine as is.
1177:
skullcaps have sometimes been misidentified as turtle carapaces
1108:
prolific: marked by abundant inventiveness or productivity
958:
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/paucity#note-1
239:
That's what I needed, thanks! I'll post the review soon.
134:
103:
629:
I would say so – just try breaking it up if possible.
1143:
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/exorbitant
316:
See my feedback below in the "Well-written" section.
1110:
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/prolific
944:below the ones that really need to be replaced:
983:Looks like this is the last one to fix, then.
907:sites, emphasizing how important this site is
514:GA Criterion: Verifiable w/o Original Research
8:
216:https://www.proquest.com/docview/305200797
30:
301:What about it is confusing specifically?
956:paucity: smallness of quantity : DEARTH
61:
33:
614:Does that make it hard to understand?
488:suggested by French archaeologist..."
7:
24:
434:Should I change it to stability?
1399:
1173:It should be rather dramatic,
1047:when it says "most productive
1:
262:
1283:GA criterion: Broad coverage
1432:
713:not sure what I'd link to
522:GA Criterion: Well written
419:More editorializing: "The
263:Nitpicks I've found so far
1417:12:10, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
1390:01:16, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
1367:14:29, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
1353:01:29, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
1319:15:09, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
1303:14:59, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
1267:16:08, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
1246:21:03, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
1232:20:12, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
1202:00:54, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
1188:22:37, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
1169:21:06, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
1155:20:12, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
1124:21:12, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
1091:22:54, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
1076:21:08, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
1062:20:12, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
1023:12:01, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
1008:02:11, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
993:00:55, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
972:21:10, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
935:19:24, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
918:16:03, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
897:14:37, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
882:14:34, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
867:01:12, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
852:00:12, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
814:17:20, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
772:23:55, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
738:14:05, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
724:12:34, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
709:01:10, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
695:17:20, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
667:17:20, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
639:00:00, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
625:17:20, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
593:14:35, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
579:12:46, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
563:23:57, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
549:17:20, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
506:17:39, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
474:17:39, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
459:12:48, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
445:21:42, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
411:14:42, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
381:17:13, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
366:14:53, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
352:14:42, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
326:14:47, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
312:14:42, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
286:23:20, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
249:22:40, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
228:17:53, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
203:16:33, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
182:01:23, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
161:14:53, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
1333:GA criterion: Images
1345:User:Dunkleosteus77
1295:User:Dunkleosteus77
1224:User:Dunkleosteus77
1221:changed to cluster
1180:User:Dunkleosteus77
1147:User:Dunkleosteus77
1083:User:Dunkleosteus77
1054:User:Dunkleosteus77
1000:User:Dunkleosteus77
910:User:Dunkleosteus77
859:User:Dunkleosteus77
806:User:Dunkleosteus77
716:User:Dunkleosteus77
687:User:Dunkleosteus77
659:User:Dunkleosteus77
617:User:Dunkleosteus77
571:User:Dunkleosteus77
541:User:Dunkleosteus77
498:User:Dunkleosteus77
466:User:Dunkleosteus77
437:User:Dunkleosteus77
403:User:Dunkleosteus77
373:User:Dunkleosteus77
344:User:Dunkleosteus77
304:User:Dunkleosteus77
278:User:Dunkleosteus77
220:User:Dunkleosteus77
174:User:Dunkleosteus77
1325:GA criterion: NPOV
762:That sounds good!
759:is scanty better?
425:Great Leap Forward
89:
88:
1423:
1403:
1402:
1351:
1301:
1230:
1186:
1153:
1089:
1060:
1006:
982:
916:
865:
812:
722:
693:
665:
623:
577:
547:
504:
472:
443:
409:
379:
350:
310:
284:
238:
226:
213:
192:
180:
165:Will add later!
139:
130:
111:
43:Copyvio detector
31:
1431:
1430:
1426:
1425:
1424:
1422:
1421:
1420:
1400:
1397:
1377:
1357:Great, thanks.
1343:
1335:
1327:
1293:
1285:
1222:
1178:
1145:
1081:
1052:
998:
976:
908:
857:
804:
795:understandable.
714:
685:
657:
615:
569:
539:
524:
516:
496:
464:
435:
401:
371:
342:
302:
276:
265:
232:
218:
207:
186:
172:
120:
97:
91:
85:
57:
29:
22:
21:
20:
18:Talk:Peking Man
12:
11:
5:
1429:
1427:
1396:
1395:Second verdict
1393:
1376:
1373:
1372:
1371:
1370:
1369:
1334:
1331:
1326:
1323:
1322:
1321:
1306:
1305:
1284:
1281:
1280:
1279:
1278:
1277:
1276:
1275:
1274:
1273:
1272:
1271:
1270:
1269:
1254:
1253:
1252:
1251:
1250:
1249:
1248:
1234:
1216:
1215:
1211:
1210:
1209:
1208:
1207:
1206:
1205:
1204:
1157:
1136:
1135:
1131:
1130:
1129:
1128:
1127:
1126:
1103:
1102:
1098:
1097:
1096:
1095:
1094:
1093:
1064:
1042:
1041:
1036:
1035:
1034:
1033:
1032:
1031:
1030:
1029:
1028:
1027:
1026:
1025:
979:Dunkleosteus77
951:
950:
941:
940:
939:
938:
937:
923:Dunkleosteus77
839:
818:
817:
816:
797:
796:
785:
784:
779:
778:
777:
776:
775:
774:
754:
753:
749:
748:
747:
746:
745:
744:
743:
742:
741:
740:
678:
677:
672:
671:
670:
669:
651:
650:
646:
645:
644:
643:
642:
641:
609:
608:
604:
603:
602:
601:
600:
599:
598:
597:
596:
595:
533:
532:
523:
520:
515:
512:
511:
510:
509:
508:
490:
489:
481:
480:
479:
478:
477:
476:
447:
429:
428:
416:
415:
414:
413:
397:
396:
390:
389:
388:
387:
386:
385:
384:
383:
336:
335:
331:
330:
329:
328:
314:
296:
295:
291:
290:
289:
288:
270:
269:
264:
261:
260:
259:
258:
257:
256:
255:
254:
253:
252:
251:
235:Dunkleosteus77
189:Dunkleosteus77
171:that was fast
140:
87:
86:
84:
83:
78:
73:
67:
64:
63:
59:
58:
56:
55:
53:External links
50:
45:
39:
36:
35:
28:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1428:
1419:
1418:
1414:
1410:
1409:Kokopelli7309
1406:
1394:
1392:
1391:
1387:
1383:
1382:Kokopelli7309
1374:
1368:
1364:
1360:
1359:Kokopelli7309
1356:
1355:
1354:
1350:
1346:
1341:
1340:
1339:
1332:
1330:
1324:
1320:
1316:
1312:
1311:Kokopelli7309
1308:
1307:
1304:
1300:
1296:
1291:
1290:
1289:
1282:
1268:
1264:
1260:
1259:Kokopelli7309
1255:
1247:
1243:
1239:
1238:Kokopelli7309
1235:
1233:
1229:
1225:
1220:
1219:
1218:
1217:
1213:
1212:
1203:
1199:
1195:
1194:Kokopelli7309
1191:
1190:
1189:
1185:
1181:
1176:
1172:
1171:
1170:
1166:
1162:
1161:Kokopelli7309
1158:
1156:
1152:
1148:
1144:
1140:
1139:
1138:
1137:
1133:
1132:
1125:
1121:
1117:
1116:Kokopelli7309
1113:
1112:
1111:
1107:
1106:
1105:
1104:
1100:
1099:
1092:
1088:
1084:
1079:
1078:
1077:
1073:
1069:
1068:Kokopelli7309
1065:
1063:
1059:
1055:
1050:
1046:
1045:
1044:
1043:
1038:
1037:
1024:
1020:
1016:
1015:Kokopelli7309
1011:
1010:
1009:
1005:
1001:
996:
995:
994:
990:
986:
985:Kokopelli7309
980:
975:
974:
973:
969:
965:
964:Kokopelli7309
961:
960:
959:
955:
954:
953:
952:
948:
947:
946:
945:
942:
936:
932:
928:
924:
921:
920:
919:
915:
911:
906:
902:
901:
900:
899:
898:
894:
890:
885:
884:
883:
879:
875:
874:Kokopelli7309
870:
869:
868:
864:
860:
855:
854:
853:
849:
845:
844:Kokopelli7309
840:
837:
833:
828:
824:
819:
815:
811:
807:
801:
800:
799:
798:
793:
789:
788:
787:
786:
781:
780:
773:
769:
765:
764:Kokopelli7309
761:
760:
758:
757:
756:
755:
751:
750:
739:
735:
731:
730:Kokopelli7309
727:
726:
725:
721:
717:
712:
711:
710:
706:
702:
701:Kokopelli7309
698:
697:
696:
692:
688:
682:
681:
680:
679:
674:
673:
668:
664:
660:
655:
654:
653:
652:
648:
647:
640:
636:
632:
631:Kokopelli7309
628:
627:
626:
622:
618:
613:
612:
611:
610:
606:
605:
594:
590:
586:
585:Kokopelli7309
582:
581:
580:
576:
572:
566:
565:
564:
560:
556:
555:Kokopelli7309
552:
551:
550:
546:
542:
537:
536:
535:
534:
530:
529:
528:
521:
519:
513:
507:
503:
499:
494:
493:
492:
491:
487:
483:
482:
475:
471:
467:
462:
461:
460:
456:
452:
451:Kokopelli7309
448:
446:
442:
438:
433:
432:
431:
430:
426:
422:
418:
417:
412:
408:
404:
399:
398:
394:
393:
392:
391:
382:
378:
374:
369:
368:
367:
363:
359:
358:Kokopelli7309
355:
354:
353:
349:
345:
340:
339:
338:
337:
333:
332:
327:
323:
319:
318:Kokopelli7309
315:
313:
309:
305:
300:
299:
298:
297:
293:
292:
287:
283:
279:
274:
273:
272:
271:
267:
266:
250:
246:
242:
241:Kokopelli7309
236:
231:
230:
229:
225:
221:
217:
211:
210:Kokopelli7309
206:
205:
204:
200:
196:
195:Kokopelli7309
190:
185:
184:
183:
179:
175:
170:
169:
168:
167:
166:
163:
162:
158:
155:
152:
148:
147:Kokopelli7309
145:
141:
138:
137:
133:
128:
124:
119:
118:
114:
109:
105:
101:
96:
95:
82:
79:
77:
74:
72:
69:
68:
66:
65:
60:
54:
51:
49:
46:
44:
41:
40:
38:
37:
32:
26:
19:
1404:
1398:
1378:
1349:push to talk
1336:
1328:
1299:push to talk
1286:
1228:push to talk
1184:push to talk
1174:
1151:push to talk
1087:push to talk
1058:push to talk
1048:
1004:push to talk
914:push to talk
904:
863:push to talk
835:
831:
826:
822:
810:push to talk
720:push to talk
691:push to talk
663:push to talk
621:push to talk
575:push to talk
545:push to talk
525:
517:
502:push to talk
485:
470:push to talk
441:push to talk
423:between the
420:
407:push to talk
377:push to talk
348:push to talk
308:push to talk
282:push to talk
224:push to talk
178:push to talk
164:
153:
143:
142:
135:
131:
117:Article talk
116:
112:
93:
90:
81:Instructions
104:visual edit
1175:H. erectus
1049:H. erectus
905:H. erectus
48:Authorship
34:GA toolbox
144:Reviewer:
71:Templates
62:Reviewing
27:GA Review
1405:Approved
1236:Thanks!
656:removed
157:contribs
76:Criteria
1375:Verdict
1040:sites."
823:thought
792:ONEDOWN
127:history
108:history
94:Article
927:Carter
889:Carter
832:called
676:parts?
400:added
275:fixed
836:Still
783:used.
495:done
463:done
136:Watch
16:<
1413:talk
1386:talk
1363:talk
1315:talk
1263:talk
1242:talk
1198:talk
1165:talk
1120:talk
1072:talk
1019:talk
989:talk
968:talk
931:talk
893:talk
878:talk
848:talk
827:many
768:talk
734:talk
705:talk
635:talk
589:talk
559:talk
455:talk
421:calm
362:talk
322:talk
245:talk
199:talk
151:talk
123:edit
100:edit
1415:)
1388:)
1365:)
1317:)
1265:)
1244:)
1200:)
1167:)
1122:)
1074:)
1021:)
991:)
970:)
933:)
895:)
880:)
850:)
770:)
736:)
707:)
637:)
591:)
561:)
486:as
457:)
364:)
324:)
247:)
201:)
159:)
125:|
106:|
102:|
1411:(
1384:(
1361:(
1347:|
1313:(
1297:|
1261:(
1240:(
1226:|
1196:(
1182:|
1163:(
1149:|
1118:(
1085:|
1070:(
1056:|
1017:(
1002:|
987:(
981::
977:@
966:(
929:(
912:|
891:(
876:(
861:|
846:(
808:|
766:(
732:(
718:|
703:(
689:|
661:|
633:(
619:|
587:(
573:|
557:(
543:|
500:|
468:|
453:(
439:|
405:|
375:|
360:(
346:|
320:(
306:|
280:|
243:(
237::
233:@
222:|
212::
208:@
197:(
191::
187:@
176:|
154:·
149:(
132:·
129:)
121:(
113:·
110:)
98:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.