Talk:Personal development - Knowledge (XXG)

214: 193: 518: 411: 109: 387: 88: 298: 1175: 1101: 1052: 618: 569: 224: 57: 421: 21: 119: 946:

This article has a lot of great information in it. I do have a suggestion though, to add more information to certain areas. I read this and find myself lost during most areas except the psychology section. There is not enough information provided as to what is being talked about and why it pertains

1148:

There is more information that needs to be added in the origins section, especially within the south asian traditions & islamic personal development. I am currently working on added additional information, I have edited this section and it is in my sandbox. Please let me know if information or

677:

edit involved actually had the revision number 358916522, and related to a previous manual insertion of the {{peacock}} template, such that the template has now disappeared from the article entirely and without substantive discussion.) Since the article then included (and still includes) "wording

900:

I'm new to wiki editing, so let me know if this is possible. I think it would be a good idea to move the "Contexts" section to be right under the "Overview" section. I feel like if we did that readers would have a little more information and be prepared for the "As an Industry", and "Origins"

742:

It would seem that this article does not specifically direct its attention to the topic: personal development. This is manifest--most noticeably--in the introductory paragraph. While workplace and institutional development relate to personal development, they are entirely different in scope.

920:

Is it not the height of orwellianism to define the development of a person by their ability to "build human capital, facilitate employability"? surely theres an alternative definition that could be used here, persons have existed a lot longer than the modern concept of employment has.

947:

to personal development. I would also say that some of the sources need to be stronger. The first source, for example, leads to a one-sentence definition of what one university says that personal development is. I think this could be found in other places and from a stronger source.

319: 819:

The personal development and the personal development planning articles should remain separate; otherwise, the article will become too large. The planning article should be linked from the other page and be more about application of the information from the general page.

992:: The source I added is almost word for word when looking at the lead compared to the first paragraph of the link I provided. I would say if it is not a reliable source then the information needs to be re-worked or removed. This is plagiarism. 705:

value since its criticism section was removed. Please discuss such changes before editting and removal, so the consensus can be seen by all. Is there any support for re-instating the Criticism balance section, or an editted version?

1240:

There are two topics which needs expansion,one is South Asian traditions and one is Islamic personal development,I being a South Asian as well a Muslim,I think I can provide credible information about both topics,what do you say?

1030:

Hi! I found this page while doing research for my adult development class. I think that if you were to add more about the subjects you will be discussing later on, it would help readers better understand what will be discussed.

925:

Apparently, this is because someone used a dictionary as a reference, a dictionary in which the given definition describes only a very narrow aspect of the topic at hand. A better source is needed and the lead needs to be

865:

Personal development and planning personal development are different: personal development does occur with or without the "planning". They should remain different entries in order to make that conceptual difference clear.

1225:

There are few places where it's been said that quotations are required to verify the information, I have those quotations from a credible and renowned personalities, I want to insert them on this page, can I? Thank you

1113: 1187: 1064: 1352: 1260:) such as peer-reviewed journal articles or books from major publishers, sure. If you are going to link to your own website or write based on your personal knowledge, no, you can't. See 581: 31: 630: 1327: 270: 369: 720:

I have finally looked into this and found that IP editor: 217.88.121.21 removed the section on 3 June 2011, with no discussion on the Talk page, and no reason given.

1322: 175: 1342: 359: 495: 280: 1347: 1312: 165: 335: 1362: 485: 642: 593: 1317: 141: 1367: 1357: 471: 447: 1337: 1332: 1072: 326: 303: 246: 1285: 1195: 1307: 1121: 881: 678:

that merely promotes the subject without imparting verifiable information" - as several included tags suggest - I propose restoring the

535: 132: 93: 434: 392: 734: 712: 237: 198: 843: 68: 906: 673:"{{Peacock|date=April 2010}}" from the article, stating in the edit-summary "Undid revision 359100945 by SmackBot ". (The 27: 728:<<. So I have re-instated this section. It is linked from other articles, so its removal causes a redlink. 762:

The "Personal development planning" does not need its own article, better if merged with "Personal development".

902: 810: 245:

articles on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

544: 1289: 446:

topics on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

74: 885: 877: 831: 931: 767: 748: 1246: 1231: 1084: 732: 710: 334:

on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

140:

on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

1242: 1227: 858: 854: 806: 967: 56: 20: 1207: 839: 789: 213: 192: 1178: