173:"...spectral type A8VnkA6". First of all, we have not been given a link to anything that explains the concept of spectrum or type, so this is probably the place to do it. Second, WTF is A8VnkA6?? This seems like gibberish even by the arcane standards of spectrum analysis. Can we give readers something more meaningful? Related to this, it is a bit odd to be told that the second star is "another white main sequence star" when we were told neither of these things about the first.
42:
165:
The article appears nuetral, stable and relatively well-written. Images appear in order, but given that every now and then we have to go round a loop with someone about Till
Credner's images, you might consider adding a note on the image page itself, with a link to where Credner explains the status
425:
Small stuff mostly, and hopefully easily sorted. Interesting assemblage of exoplanets. Soon i think we will have discovered so many that it will become a challenge to filter the most significant for the constellation articles...
243:"had recorded its Right Ascension one hour too small." this sounds somehow ungrammatical to me, but i'm having trouble working out what would be better. Not sure if the issue is just the word "small", or it's something else.
288:
a note - Bayer and lacaille would simply give two stars very close to each other the same designation with no modifier. It was left to later astronomers such as Gould to designate Eta, Etaetc.
276:"Lacaille named two neighbouring stars Eta Pictoris." How can someone name two stars by one name? Is the point that he named a star something, and it turned out to be a binary? If so, reword.
80:
70:
170:
I don't know what culmination is, but interestingly it is not mentioned in the
Triangulum FA, but is included here. Not an issue for this GA obviously!
47:
156:
75:
396:
401:- but I've found another study questioning this so might remove for the time being as a bit of a mess that I will have to unravel
181:
sorted main sequence issue - alpha is as well, I just neglected to put it in..put footnote and linked to spectral type now.....
126:
498:
462:
413:
371:
338:
300:
263:
230:
193:
52:
122:
107:
476:
431:
150:
99:
445:
359:
reworded - I need to read the source again to get my head around it....I think it needs a bit more info.
492:
472:
456:
427:
407:
365:
332:
294:
257:
224:
187:
146:
488:
452:
403:
361:
328:
290:
253:
220:
183:
322:
115:
17:
207:
166:
of the images (I can't remember where that is, off the top of my head).
92:
502:
480:
466:
435:
417:
375:
342:
304:
267:
234:
197:
160:
444:
Indeed - one of the reasons I was unsure how to proceed with
450:
was that it has 88 stellar systems with planets so far.....
384:
How amazing - a planet potentially 11 billion years old!
285:
134:
103:
8:
30:
387:" magnetic white dwarf" - what is this?
351:"intrinsic variability" - what is this?
61:
33:
471:Thanks Cas, i think we're done here.
7:
206:should "orange giant" be linked to
24:
398:Polar (cataclysmic variable star)
324:binary star#Eclipsing_binaries
251:maybe "low" sounds better ....
1:
313:"eclipsing binary " - link?
525:
503:03:32, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
481:23:39, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
467:06:13, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
436:05:16, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
418:21:09, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
376:23:16, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
343:06:13, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
305:22:30, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
268:21:12, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
235:06:10, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
198:14:37, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
161:05:16, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
486:much appreciated/thanks
447:Cygnus (constellation)
89:
88:
516:
487:
451:
448:
402:
399:
360:
327:
325:
289:
252:
219:
182:
139:
130:
111:
43:Copyvio detector
31:
524:
523:
519:
518:
517:
515:
514:
513:
485:
446:
443:
397:
394:
358:
323:
320:
283:
250:
217:
180:
120:
97:
91:
85:
57:
29:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
522:
520:
512:
511:
510:
509:
508:
507:
506:
505:
423:
422:
421:
420:
389:
388:
385:
381:
380:
379:
378:
353:
352:
348:
347:
346:
345:
315:
314:
310:
309:
308:
307:
278:
277:
273:
272:
271:
270:
245:
244:
240:
239:
238:
237:
212:
211:
203:
202:
201:
200:
175:
174:
171:
140:
87:
86:
84:
83:
78:
73:
67:
64:
63:
59:
58:
56:
55:
53:External links
50:
45:
39:
36:
35:
28:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
521:
504:
500:
497:
494:
490:
484:
483:
482:
478:
474:
473:hamiltonstone
470:
469:
468:
464:
461:
458:
454:
449:
442:
441:
440:
439:
438:
437:
433:
429:
428:hamiltonstone
419:
415:
412:
409:
405:
400:
393:
392:
391:
390:
386:
383:
382:
377:
373:
370:
367:
363:
357:
356:
355:
354:
350:
349:
344:
340:
337:
334:
330:
326:
319:
318:
317:
316:
312:
311:
306:
302:
299:
296:
292:
287:
282:
281:
280:
279:
275:
274:
269:
265:
262:
259:
255:
249:
248:
247:
246:
242:
241:
236:
232:
229:
226:
222:
216:
215:
214:
213:
209:
205:
204:
199:
195:
192:
189:
185:
179:
178:
177:
176:
172:
169:
168:
167:
163:
162:
158:
155:
152:
148:
147:Hamiltonstone
145:
141:
138:
137:
133:
128:
124:
119:
118:
114:
109:
105:
101:
96:
95:
82:
79:
77:
74:
72:
69:
68:
66:
65:
60:
54:
51:
49:
46:
44:
41:
40:
38:
37:
32:
26:
19:
495:
459:
424:
410:
368:
335:
297:
260:
227:
190:
164:
153:
143:
142:
135:
131:
117:Article talk
116:
112:
93:
90:
81:Instructions
218:yep. linked
104:visual edit
18:Talk:Pictor
321:linked to
208:giant star
48:Authorship
34:GA toolbox
489:Cas Liber
453:Cas Liber
404:Cas Liber
362:Cas Liber
329:Cas Liber
291:Cas Liber
254:Cas Liber
221:Cas Liber
184:Cas Liber
144:Reviewer:
71:Templates
62:Reviewing
27:GA Review
499:contribs
463:contribs
414:contribs
372:contribs
339:contribs
301:contribs
264:contribs
231:contribs
194:contribs
157:contribs
76:Criteria
127:history
108:history
94:Article
395:It is
286:added
136:Watch
16:<
493:talk
477:talk
457:talk
432:talk
408:talk
366:talk
333:talk
295:talk
258:talk
225:talk
188:talk
151:talk
123:edit
100:edit
501:)
479:)
465:)
434:)
416:)
374:)
341:)
303:)
284:I
266:)
233:)
196:)
159:)
125:|
106:|
102:|
496:·
491:(
475:(
460:·
455:(
430:(
411:·
406:(
369:·
364:(
336:·
331:(
298:·
293:(
261:·
256:(
228:·
223:(
210:?
191:·
186:(
154:·
149:(
132:·
129:)
121:(
113:·
110:)
98:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.