Talk:Pieds-noirs - Knowledge (XXG)

4154:, in the middle) never occurred at all. It is virtually always "ieds-oirs". When lower-cased, the referent can usually be summarized as "a group of French immigrants to Algeria" or later as "repatriating immigrants from French Algeria back to France, especially particular places like Corsica", or later still as "political separatists or other agitators in Corsica and some other places", and in many cases as "a class of literary and theatrical stereotypes/tropes in modern French fictional works" (especially Camus). But when the meaning is something that could be summed up as "an ethno-cultural group of mixed European, African, and sometimes Jewish ancestry that developed in colonial Algeria; and the diaspora thereof", capitalization is far more likely. However, sometimes the capitalization is avoided in what appears to be an attempt to closely follow French capitalization practice (this is supported further by English writers often putting the term in italics as a foreignism and providing a translation of it). That said, it cannot be entirely ruled out that in a few of these cases there isn't a PoV-pushing dismissive/minimization intent of simply denying them capitalization to imply they are not a real/legit ethno-cultural group. Either way, the rationale for the lower-casing as an ethnic label in English doesn't seem applicable to WP writing. One side point I noticed in skimming past the French-language material is that total lower-casing isn't even universal in French, though it does dominate in that language; while I did see a handful of French "Pieds-noirs", I did not see any French "Pieds-Noirs". 4146:, and ignore the French-language results, just consider the English ones. What we have (for plural forms), in the order in which they appear (at least for me; Google may monkey with that order on a per-request basis) in the first 20 pages of search results (I don't have all day for this) are: pieds-noirs, Pieds-noirs, pieds-noirs, pieds-noirs, Pieds-Noirs, pieds-noirs, Pieds-noirs, pieds-noirs, Pieds-Noirs, PiedsNoirs, Pieds-Noirs, piedsnoirs, pieds-noirs, pieds-noirs, Pieds-noirs, pieds-noirs, Pieds-Noirs, Pieds-Noirs, pieds-noirs, Pieds-Noirs, pieds-noirs, pieds noirs but pied-noir as an adjective in the same article, Pieds-Noirs but pied-noir as an adjective in the same article, Pieds-Noirs, pieds-noirs, Pieds Noirs, pieds-noirs, pieds-noirs, Pieds Noirs, pieds-noirs, Pieds-noirs, Pieds-Noirs, Pieds Noirs, Pieds-Noirs, pieds-noirs, Pied-Noirs, pieds-noirs, pieds-noirs, Pieds-Noirs, pieds-noirs, pieds-noirs, pieds-noirs, pieds-noirs, pieds noirs but pied-noir as an adj. in same material. Some skimming examination of this material and the usage within it shows the following patterns: The hyphenation overwhemlmingly dominates. When capitalization is used, capitalizing after the hyphen is optional. (In the rare event of no hyphen, and a capitalized "Pied", then but only then is a capitalized "Noir" actually necessary.) "ied-oirs" (only one 4610:

hyphenate it, in order to clarify that we are not talking about actual feet, but I am not maintaining that this is the One True Answer, and did not do so consistently in the discussion above, mostly because I am lazy, usually in a hurry, and grinding my teeth over the capitals not the hyphen. It is clear I am talking about the topic of this discussion on this page. I realize that I am basing these statements on French grammar and not on sources, but I do think it is good to be grammatical, and that we should not necessarily discount the Knowledge (XXG) effect on the sources. It is possible that people are capitalizing because they think we know something about this ;) Also, other people here have already looked at sources but it's been quite a long time since I said, further up the page, that iff the question is what the French conventions are, then Larousse = OED pretty much. I hope that helps someone somehow; that's all I've got.

3966:(much later just noting that I have since looked up Blitz Kids and New Romantics and agree that these are good examples of compound terms that refer to distinct groups of people who are not necessarily of the same ethnicity. There is still a common characteristic though. I think the problem here is defining the group and the two-tier system of French citizenship perhaps was a root cause. The French wikipedia article makes a distinction between the pieds noirs and the repatriated. Not everyone in French Algerian was an actual "citizen" as opposed to a "national" and resentment over that is probably the defining characteristic of the group. These were French citizens in a sense of "citizen" that was denied to most of the Algerian population. 4187:) to the strictest possible interpretation, otherwise we're going to end with 99.99% of ethnic groups being capitalized with one or two isolates downcased for reasons that to most readers will be indistinguishable from racist hostility by vandals. PS: We already know from a previous RfC that the community has no appetite for forcing lower-case "black" in an ethno-racial sense, and concluded to leave this to consensus on an article-by-article basis as long as it's consistent within an article. So, that is a further strong indication that this should be capitalized, even if we do not need to over-capitalize it as "Pieds- 4620:

mind explaining that. I have been saying no, because while it's obviously imported from French, it is used in only this one niche context. And the reactions here indicate that many if not most English speakers have never encountered it. But that part I possibly could be wrong about. Similarly, it seems to me that we are talking about a group of people, sure. but not an ethnic group or a group of residents of a particular city as in Washingtonians or Oregonian. I think the definition you gave above for the group is pretty much correct, but I do not claim any particular expertise about them,

4020:(ec)I agree that it doesn't have to be an ethnic group but it seems to me they should still share a common characteristic. Somewhere above I gave Washingtonians and Oregonians as examples. But here we have people who have at least one ancestor from some country in Europe, plus some other people who practice a religion. So the common factor is what exactly? "Forty Niners" -- the gold rush people not the football team -- would be a better example, since I for one don't know what a Blitz Kid is. I don't know if that gets us anywhere though. But in this RM we only have to agree on the 1065:-ish decision – if any consensus exists on the capitalization of the P, it's an incredibly slim one – so editors should feel free to further discuss the topic of running-text capitalization if they feel that such discussion would be fruitful.A second question that emerged was whether to use italics for the term, and on this, I see a consensus that italicization is appropriate: most editors who weighed in on the topic observed that italicization was common in RS and felt that English-language sources typically treated "pieds-noirs" as a foreign word. 4662:

shelling and bombing civilians on what was on paper French territory. This article falsely tells the reader that the violence began with the "first armed operations" of the FLN in 1954 instead of with French organised massacres of Algerians in 1945 as happened in reality. The torture regime of the French also goes without mention, Gen. Massu (a war criminal) is depicted as a man who only tried to maintain public order. Later the OAS is merely "accused" of murders and bombings.How on earth has this a 'good article' rating?

412: 402: 381: 4131:. This is not an English word/name, but French, so should not be mangled with English syntax and typographic norms (and "Pied-Noir" with an internally capitalized "N" doesn't even suit universal English-writing norms, but is simply something that particular writers and publishers would do while others would do the opposite; our default rule is to not use capitalization that is not actually necessary). Since "Pied-noirs" is not entirely unheard of, this "Franglais" mish-mash should appear as a 1870:(Note toggle button on the upper right to switch from English to French) My question is: is this a derogatory term? MOS seems to say that if it is derogatory, then it should not have an article at all. I do not think that it is *that* derogatory, but you tell me. Back in the history of the article, somebody deleted the term. I found one dictionary that uses capitals, and it's the Oxford Reference, which we have to count. Oh and I just found an instance of this in the highly respectable 1041:. I also see a clear consensus to pluralize the title – virtually every commenter in the RM either supported pluralization outright or was neutral on the topic – and strong evidence was provided to show that "pieds-noirs" is the predominant plural form for the term.The most contentious issue in this discussion is one that doesn't actually have a direct bearing on the article title: should the initial P be capitalized in running text? Policy-wise, this particular dispute centered on 833: 503: 482: 696: 190: 169: 4728:(pinged) It is quite likely that this article was translated from French with its chavinisms intact. It is also possible that the person complaining below about undue may have a point, though it is hard to get other people to see it that point when atrocities are involved. This is not a topic I have exactly studied, but the amount of anger I am hearing does not seem like a good place to start a discussion 33: 200: 3011:(on which I have been doing GA prep sice February) covers the huge role played by North Africa and Algeria in particular as a place of refuge for the Jews of Europe. Then there is the matter of the converted European slaves, who were Danish, Albanian, Corsican, Italian and English. Off the top of my head. A century of colonization would not make all those people "French". Thank you for asking. 85: 64: 297: 276: 95: 1924:, in French) But "Wikipedians" is not. Rather, it is a descriptor, like "Algerians" or "Filipinos" or "housecats" or "coin". Anyone reading this is probably a Wikipedian. But is *not* themselves "Knowledge (XXG)". BTW, "Pied-noirs" is simply wrong and gives me a headache. Once upon a time I failed spelling tests for this. May I point out that the plural of "Governor-General" 307: 3925:. I think it doesn't really matter whether it refers to an ethnicity or not – it's the name of a group of people. The guideline refers to "peoples and cultures, ... and the like". If "Pieds-noirs" isn't an ethnic identification, it's still a name for one of the "peoples and cultures, ... and the like". The 'P' should be capped – at least unless it is 1053:. However, editors were divided on whether "pieds-noirs" would be encompassed within this description: some felt that they were a sufficiently distinct cultural group to justify capitalization, whereas others felt that the group was insufficiently ethnic in nature to allow it. It was also shown that, per Ngrams, the lowercase-p spelling is the 2092:, ("Names for peoples and cultures, languages and dialects, nationalities, ethnic and religious groups, demonyms, and the like are capitalized,) whether or not to continue to think of it that way might be best decided by a local consensus such as in this move request discussion. It probably should stay a proper noun phrase similar to the 573: 2802:. With the smoothing off, one easily finds that the bulk of the capitalized occurrences in English books is from a couple of 2015 books, and that the forms without the hyphen used to be much more common, but now with the hyphen are about even with them (with lots of fluctuation due to individual books in different years). 2603:? and 2) It's compelling because it makes it clear that we're nowhere near the MOS:CAPS criterion of "consistently capitalized" in sources. and 3) are you seriously saying you think this is a proper name, or just trolling? (I see you said on your talk page "Ha ha ha (I'm just playing devil's advocate)" about this). 2924:" refers to people. That seems to be the Knowledge (XXG) style. Again, I'm not taking sides, I'm just pointing out what is in the MoS. Since the term is hyphenated, it is not a noun phrase, it is simply a one-word, hyphenated proper noun, and so it seems that the correct form according to our own MoS is " 4749:

For the record, I just took a look at the article history and see that I have quite a few edits there. These would have been translation from the French article though, or a huge copyedit -- I am not particularly knowledgeable in this history. I do find it quite plausible from the rest of ehat I know

3821:

Yes, if I read editor Elinruby correctly, we both agree on the capital "P" in the article title. Our one area of contention appears to be the side issue (which has nothing to do with this title change request) in regard to the use of the capital "P" in the running text of the article's content, which

2196:

the capitalization of both "Pied" and "Noir" in this article title and in running text was begun. Before that, the article had been created in the French style of "Pied-noir" as the title and "pied-noir" in running text. I think it was 2007 when it became "Pied-noir" in running text, and then in 2008

4661:

This article is hopelessly biased in favour of the settlers. It is not written by a native English speaker and makes no mention whatsoever of the Sétif and Guelma massacres (1945) and the general campaign launched by France to terrorize and massacre Algerians, with even the French navy and air force

2873:

It is not unusual in Knowledge (XXG) for titles to exist "as a proper name" contrary to guidelines for many years. Some of work on finding and fixing such things. The "reason not to continue" "using the term as a proper name" is that this sends a false signal to readers that this is a proper name,

2305:

was whether there had been edit warring on the page. At this point, given the RfC, it no longer matters. I appreciate the thought, though, I guess, but please do not make any more statements such as "consensus has been to think of this as a proper noun phrase" and then claim to be neutral. As you so

2045:

The word "chair" is the common name of the furniture on which we sit to eat supper. Perhaps there are some who name their chairs, but I'm not one of them. I do know people who have proper names for their automobiles (automobile, auto, car, these are common names for a type of vehicle). One guy named

4609:

take an s in the plural. Adjectives are modified by their nouns and take on their number and gender. There is simply no question about that. I haven't seen this particular term enough to have strong feelings about whether the hyphenated form is "correct". I myself as a French speaker am inclined to

4604:

I read MoS as saying that for words derived from French, a loanword should follow the conventions for English, Otherwise, untranslated French that is not a loanword or a proper noun should follow French-language conventions. Is that right? I note that you are the primary author of that MoS page. If

4465:

I would also like to point out that this article has problems with the singular and plural forms of the terms "Pied-Noir" (singular form) and "Pieds-Noirs" (plural form); some sentences may require the singular form instead of the plural form, while others may require the plural form instead of the

3851:

Oh, I see – it was me who was mistaken – I didn't spot the difference in running text descriptions. As for running text, regardless of whether this is really an ethnic group or not, my impression is that it fits within the category of "Names for peoples and cultures, ... nationalities, ethnic and

3041:

so you're going to assign people to the group whether they like it or not? The section that I think you should read in particular is "Rapatriés d'Algérie et pieds-noirs" which goes into citizenship, birthplace, ethnicity, and nationality. A section just above discusses French government propaganda.

2726:

people are not written "blackfoot", and that example is obviously extremely pertient here given what "Pied-noir" means). It has no currency in everyday English. It is very frequently put in italics as a foreignism in English-language publications (and usually given a translation) even in specialist

2168:

so you are again emphasizing that this is the English language Knowledge (XXG). Yes and? I am *quoting* the English-language Knowledge (XXG). Have you not noticed this? It is a quote from the Manual of Style of the English-language Knowledge (XXG), provided as a rationale for the original erroneous

2030:

Um, no. Your chairs have unique names? I think not. I really don't think so, and I have just spent hours on the standards for diactitical marks so I am pretty much off to seek the sunshine. But many are the ways in which I have been known to misunderstand something, so hey ypu could be right. Could

1549:

Yeah, I'm guessing this is a loanword that's rarely used outside of this (relatively) narrow topic and thus there's isn't strong agreement on how to treat it. If easier, it might be worth picking a standard for this article and then adding a brief footnote in the lead about variable capitalization.

950:

I can't tell what you are saying. It sounds like you agree with me but think the title cannot be changed. But of course it *could* be. Resistance would be massive to "pied-noir" however, for style reasons. But I don't see why it has to be Pied-Noir. Just WRONG. But I wasn't losing any sleep over it

881:

For inscrutable reasons based on unknown research someone some years ago decided that it was correct to capitalize not only Pied but also Noir, which is fundamentally wrong twice over. redirects this spelling to the correct "pied-noir". This is about as authoritative as it gets. It seems the logic

4619:

Some people do appear to believe that it is a loanword or a proper noun however. I think that you said that it is not a proper noun (please correct me if I am wrong about that, and tell me what you do in fact think) but I am especially interested in whether you think it is a loanword, if you don't

4810:

Although this is a good article in terms of structure, it was largely translated from the French language Knowledge (XXG) and, no offence (I consider fr.wiki the second best Knowledge (XXG); the first is the English language Knowledge (XXG), en.wiki), the fr.wiki page is quite biased in favour of

4638:

Incidentally, I don't think American Blacks are a good analogy, since French speakers would have no expectation of capitalization, nor association of it with personhood the way an English speaker might, but urging caution on that front is a better argument than most as these things go. It is true

3866:

I don't see how. Their origins were extremely diverse and apparently some of the Jews had ancestors from the Levant originally so even "European" is too narrow a term. And I question whether "European" is an ethnic group. If it is not, then MoS says to follow French convention. But we are talking

2264:

If the French expression is untranslated (not a loanword), follow French capitalization practice. For French: some expressions are not capitalized at all (e.g., fin de siècle), others have a capitalization of the first word.If the French expression is untranslated (not a loanword), follow French

2512:

The effective definition for our purposes is given in MOS:CAPS: "In English, capitalization is primarily needed for proper names, acronyms, and for the first letter of a sentence. Knowledge (XXG) relies on sources to determine what is conventionally capitalized; only words and phrases that are

2318:

that! and you dismissed it and "explained" that no, I *really* meant "proper name". "Proper name" is not a thing. It's really annoying, and we have looped through this several times now. Please process that 2!=3 even if somebody once made a mistake in their sums. Pieds-noirs are not a "single

2173:

Manual of Style, this is not the time or place to debate it. It says that we should, in this case, apply the French capitalization conventions. Quote explicitly. In the rationale for the erroneous redirect you say is 15 years old. Apparently somebody thought "pieds-noirs" was an ethnic group.

1970:

not really. There is only one Seattle. Even if there are several places named Paris, in each case, "Paris" is the name of the thing, with a greater or lesser precision. Speaking from here on the Pacific coast I might include distant suburbs, I suppose. Or is it "school-teacher" you object to?

1720:

of our article, but when capitalized, especially in older sources, may refer to the Blackfoot people; that's rare in English though. Older sources also sometimes refer to "Cercosporella Foot Rot of Winter Cereals" as "Pied noir des céréales" (no hyphen); also "Hector A. Pied-noir" and "at

2617:

The same as before, ngram just picks up the words with total disregard about whether they are quoted in French in an English source as nouns or adjectives. It's much better to check how it's spelled in the reliable sources that are about the subject (such as the ones that I quoted above).

2203:

redirect's creation date; it was made in May of 2008 two months after the edit that capitalized "Pied-Noir" in this article. These are not opinions, they are facts found in the editing histories of these pages. I have no opinion and am neutral in regard to how this phrase is capitalized.

2287:

deep breath. As politely as possible I would like to suggest that I do not feel that I need to have anything "explained" to me. I am not linking to Knowledge (XXG) articles that prove me wrong; you are. Your confusion about the terminology involved is unhelpful here and is confusing the

4280:, we would cap the name of a race of people or ethnic group. This is a reflection that these demonyms are derived from proper names for a nation, region, religion etc - eg French, German or Siek. The subject term is not a race or ethnic group in the conventional sense that would invoke 1865:

No. I am just back from a really deep dive in the English and French MOS. Neither of them address anything at all about the entire continent of Africa, as far as I can tell. So shame on us. However. The Canadian Encyclopedia uses "Pied-Noir" as a translation of the name of indigenous

2003:

Not for anything, but there is a significant difference between "name", a broad term, and "proper name", the latter being interchangable with "proper noun". An example would be the "name" of the piece of furniture in which you sit to eat your meal, which is "chair", a "common name".

2653:, italicized as if French, though its capitalization is clearly wrong for that, and also has "the pied noirs adopted the name with pride" without italics, that is, lowercase in English with English-like pluralization; plus a bunch of other stuff especially for the cuisine they call 1505: 2799: 2600: 2124:

you also appear to be under the impression that "pied-noir" is an ethnicity, which it is not. "Immigrant" or "settler" is a more analogous term. There is no cultural homogeneity implied, regardless of the hypothetical pnthropomorphism of inanimate mass-produced objects.

1428:

but it does not seem to make any pronouncements at all about Algeria. Which is possibly wise. I know a little about the place, but the little I know is pretty French. Where/When was it decided that the article title should be capitalized? Nobody is speaking up, shrug

4119:, the linguistically and stylistically most defensible form. Where it needs to be pluralized (and a strong argument can be made to do that in the title, to agree with other ethno-cultural group names – but there are some exceptions that probably need to move, e.g. 3240: 2795: 4163:: It would be (or strongly come off as) an antagonistic PoV exercise to totally lower-case this ethnonym (even if it is largely an exonym) when we do not do this with any other such group (including even other multi-ethnic groups with a French component like the 1123:; of course, all other pages that maintain capitalisation should also be changed (about this last point, I think I'm one of the very few in this encyclopaedia who cares about consistency between articles; perhaps because it's tedious and time-consuming work). 3276:

the French article discusses the varying definitions of "repatriated" in various time periods at enormous length and the discussion would benefit if some of participants here read it. If anyone needs help running it through Google Translate, let me know.

2657:. Clearly not a good source for linguistic style. Anyway, I don't see what your point is about the usage as an adjective; we don't downcase proper names used as adjectives (e.g. Algerian cuisine), so how does finding some of them as adjectives matter? 1464:

Judging by some English dictionaries & encyclopedias, it seems to be lowercase, just like in French. Also without a hyphen, apparently, and it seems even the first letter is lowercase (when it's not a title or at the beginning of a sentence). E.g.:

4708:

of 1954-62. These are covered in detail in several other Knowledge (XXG) articles and should not be given prominence in the history of a sizeable civilian community (of French, Spanish, Jewish and Maltese origins) over a period of 130 years.

4415: 3201: 2096:, although to be honest I'm neutral on the subject and would be satisfied either keeping it a proper noun phrase or not. That and whether or not it is considered a derogatory term should be aided by the term's usage in reliable sources. 2362:

Does it make a difference? Wouldn't we use lowercase either way, since it's way more often lowercase in English-language sources? I'm not following all the discussion above, but I don't think I see anyone arguing for uppercase.

1834:

People sometimes read old documents and look at resources like Knowledge (XXG) to try to understand them, and Knowledge (XXG) tries to include historical information rather than just discussing what is most current and up-to-date.

909:

Since there is prior discussion about this on the talk page, however erroneous, I will stop correcting this pending some input, but right now would need some fairly major evidence to convince me that Larousse is wrong about this.

1769:

Yeah I've see the alternate meaning used at, for example, Government of Canada websites. In French, though. The English version says Blackfoot. So this is in at least some level of current use, but for what is clearly a separate

4505:

I think (with all due respect to other users) I'm one of the bravest users of this encyclopedia, especially after I stopped asking questions at the help desk (now one every two months). I just wanted to report the problem here.

2031:

you please provide an example of a chair that has its own unique name? Like Susan or Fred or Microsoft? I will check it out when I come back tonight. Thanks. I just came back to link Pied-Noir as a translation of Blackfoot.

2245: 3674:

This is not the full list but it's approximately the top half, minus somepeople who say they are interested in Elvish and Ancient Egyptian.. My mobile interface is misbehaving, quitting for now. Let's see if that helps.

2920:, which clearly states: "Names for peoples and cultures, languages and dialects, nationalities, ethnic and religious groups, demonyms, and the like are capitalized,". It is also clear in this article that the term " 1902:

The French Knowledge (XXG) MOS does not address Algeria at all and neither does the English. The English MOS says that if there is an anglicized loanword we should use it. But there isn't. As to the question about

1391:

This is another proof that dictionaries are in many respects extremely limited. If "Pied-Noir" is or was considered derogatory, then why do they use it themselves and why did the OAS use it while addressing them?

2398: 1907:: I am not certain who will be responding to this, so I hope it will not sound condescending if I explain this. Speakers of Arabic are quite likely, for example. A proper noun is just a schoolteacher word for a 4258:

as article title but pieds-noirs in running text. Per ngrams and Google Scholar (limited to Enlish language sources), it is clear that the plural form is the usual form in RSs and this would be consistent with

4275:

capping proper nouns compared with English, which often caps words derived from proper nous but not used as proper nouns. It is not capped in French. This tells us that it is not inherently a proper noun. Per

2858:

we've been using the term as a proper name since 2008 and I see no reason not to continue to do so, especially given the fact that it fits the definition and is used as such in multiple RS about the subject.

2722:"}}: Yes, there are several. It is not a word, in the general sense, but an ethnonym, a name. (That it's derived from everyday words that remain "transparent" to many of us is immaterial; the North American 4317:, it would appear that the hyphenated form would be required in French but not (necessarily) in English. It is probable that the hyphenation in English is more of a carry-over from the French rather than a 3411:

is true, and it's not exclusively rendered in English with case caps, then it should be lower case for the second N (and the first we just have to leave as-is due to technical limitations, if I recall).

2440:

would discourage uppercase after a hyphen. This would especially be the case when sources are mixed. (And Ngrams might be getting some uppercase from title-case headlines, which we should discount.) —⁠ ⁠

2973:

Since you are again "explaining" wrong, I will no longer refrain from saying you that your misunderstanding is mistaken. It does not fit that definition because the pieds-noirs are not an ethnic group.

3881:

clarifying something: these people were "French" in the sense that they were born in Algeria at a time when the French government considered Algeria to be part of France. 20:06, 19 April 2024 (UTC)

2188:

You appear to have a problem understanding me. I'm just answering questions, and I'm neutral as to the capitalization. I'm not talking about the redirect, as I haven't checked its age. You asked

4850:. I honestly don't understand why, almost always, only the terms of the page on which the agreement was reached are changed. By working in this way, unfortunately, the encyclopedia loses value ( 4534:

I am notorious for rushing in where angels fear to tread and I given the reluctance to read definitions that is in display in this RM I would myself hesitate to correct anything in this article.

2397:

That's a lame comparison; the "Pied-noir" usage is only from "pied-noir" in sentence-initial or sentence-case context, or even title-case while avoid caps after hyphen. The real comparison is

906:. Countries are capitalized, citizenships are not. Ever. This makes my teeth hurt. The first word of a title (as of this article) is capitalized. ONLY. The article title should be Pied-noir. 3807:: "Names for peoples and cultures, ... nationalities, ethnic and religious groups, demonyms, and the like are capitalized." SMcCandlish agrees. An ethnonym is a name for an ethnic group. —⁠ ⁠ 2378: 2902:

I'm not sure which theoretical definition you think it fits, but WP's practical definition is "consistently capitalized" in sources, and it certainly doesn't come close to fitting that one.

2121:

May I please gently suggest that you double-check your link to "proper name"? It redirects to "proper noun", which is exactly my point. So why are you trying to explain this to me again?

4337:. However, if it is italicised, then hypenation would appear to be necessary in order to conform with the French. This would also confirm the absence of capitalisation in running prose. 4271:, we should not be capping this at all. Linguistically, there is no difference between French and English as to what is a proper noun. The difference is that French is more rigorous in 4143: 3852:

religious groups, demonyms, and the like" (and thus it should use capital 'P'), although I suppose that's not something that needs to be settled in order for the RM to be closed. —⁠ ⁠

3129:

Well, if you insist; however that quote from the Manual of Style includes all "groups" of people that have a group name, it also applies to nationalities, religious groups, demonyms,

4354:

as article title but pieds-noirs in running text. Per previous comment, and per the Ethnonym/people test (which I think I just invented): singularize/adjectivize the term and append

656: 3764:

And will you please cease all responses to me, because the community does not agree with you as shown in the guideline, and frankly your responses to me appear to be too much like

1488: 707: 604: 2874:

and our guidelines specifically say we should not treat things as proper names unless they're capitalized in a substantial majority of English-language sources. So let's fix it.

629: 619: 3103:

A good one? Yes, absolutely. And you are right about the mutuality of this. I will look also but I am about to be tied up RL for about six to eight hours, so not immediately.

3867:

about the title here, and in the title the first letter of the first word should be capitalized according to both French capitalization convention and Knowledge (XXG) style.

4957: 634: 624: 1068: 553: 3025:

I really wish things were that simple, but unfortunately, anyone who dealt with the issue of "ethnic groups" will tell you that it's an extremely complicated subject.

2143:, who asked about whether or not the title phrase was an English proper noun. The title phrase has been a proper noun phrase on the English WP for more than 15 years. 2494:

What I'm saying is that "Pied-Noir" is a proper name (or at least, I see no reason why it shouldn't considered as such given that it fits the definition). Please see

2332:

let's let other people talk, shall we? At a minimum this is a formal request that you refrain from "explaining" anything else to me, please and thank you very much.

3089:

I didn't ask for a citation when you made the assertion, but that's fine, I'll look for one. Just one question though: would a citation make you change your mind?

4942: 543: 1274:). I also notice it is often derogatory. My impression is that derogatory terms for people are typically singular rather than plural on Knowledge (XXG), such as 669: 4237:

it doesn't matter whether it is or isn't, since the Knowledge (XXG) style to capitalize the first letter of the article title would over-ride that to my mind.

1137:

It can rather easily be changed but is there a local consensus against it is the question. I don't know that I am willing to die on this hil. But nonetheless

3161: 2917: 4947: 4770:

as for how it for a good article rating, well. Presumably the reviewer didn't know that history was missing. You are allowed to contest that rating, btw.

3165:

strongly supports this move request. We might also consider natural disambiguation so readers know at a glance who the subjects of this article are, as in

4183:

could be applied to totally lower-case this, I have to state firmly that ethnonyms are a subject for which we have to apply a common-sense exception (per

1502: 803: 765: 519: 363: 258: 1061:, I will need to introduce one style or the other into the article, and so the COMMONNAME factor leads me to slightly favor lowercasing the P. This is a 614: 464: 151: 2265:

capitalization practice. For French: some expressions are not capitalized at all (e.g., fin de siècle), others have a capitalization of the first word.

518:, nationalities, and other cultural identities on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join 4897: 248: 4937: 4912: 4882: 1081: 665: 353: 141: 4639:

that the vast majority of French speakers would have some familiarity with the English language, especially any that wind up reading this article.

1933: 1424:

It is possible that at some point WikiProject Algeria, if there is or was one, reached a consensus about this at some point. I just took a look at

224: 4927: 2976:

And yes, you are voting, since you are pronouncing the definition correct. Correct that definition may be, but it is misapplied in this instance.

1482:

a person of European origin who lived in Algeria during French rule, especially one who returned to Europe after Algeria was granted independence.

454: 4852:

some users claim that these changes are pointless, superfluous and trivial (absurd...), but when this becomes a habit, the errors become numerous

2084:

Yes, ever since about 2008, which was when the title and running text were changed to the proper noun phrase, "Pied-Noir", here on the "English"

3750:

stop doing that. The fact that you make a claim does not demonstrate it's correctness. The capital p should stay in the article title, is all.

2473: 1308:

rather than about the people described by the terms, and that might also explain the singular titles for articles about pejorative terms. —⁠ ⁠

725: 577: 510: 487: 4962: 4917: 4902: 4887: 4139:

it can be reliably sourced, which so far it has not been. But they should not thereafter be used by WP as if proper English or proper French.

4684:

do you think we should change one or more sentences within this article? I pinged you because we're both interested in this (French) topic.

4313:

On the matter of hyphenation, ngram results indicate a preference for the hyphenated form, while Google Scholar indicates the converse. Per

329: 4932: 3909:

But "Corsicans" is not the best example, as that is derived from the name of a place – i.e., Corsica. A potentially better example may be

117: 1013:

Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a

4663: 1929: 4952: 2477: 2267:

Since it is the the title of a Knowledge (XXG) article, that should be "Pied-noir". In the article body we should be using "pied-noir"

4907: 4892: 2888:

I have yet to read a single valid argument as to why it shouldn't be considered as a proper name (given that it fits the definition).

2685:

The others use caps as you said. I can list twice that many using lowercase in short order, if that's worth anything. But it's not.

713: 4922: 4877: 4581: 4202: 2916:

I think the definition to which editor M.Bitton alludes might be one I've already linked in this discussion, so here it is again...

2738: 4175:

es) is clearly standardized near-unversally, against variants like "Pied-noirs" and "Pieds-noir" (or "Pied-noir" being used as an

3007:

According to the demographics of those repatriated from Algeria, spelled out in the article I keep saying you should read. Also,

3913:, specifically the capital 'K' of "Kids" (not the capital 'B', since that's derived from the name of an institution). Similarly, 320: 281: 213: 174: 4333:. The phrase appears in several prominent English language dictionaries. This would indicate a status as a loan word and that 3399:

and say it's Waikiki in English and Waikīkī in Hawaiian, but that's popular perception and not actually how it works out, and

425: 386: 108: 69: 44: 2348:

I hope you don't mind me asking another question: is there any reason why "Pied-Noir" shouldn't be considered as a loanword?

2312:"A proper noun is a noun that identifies a single entity and is used to refer to that entity (Africa; Jupiter; Sarah" Walmart 2088:, consensus has been to think of this title as a proper noun phrase. Since there does not seem to be a lot about this in the 4179:-less collective plural, for that matter; rather, it's a singular and an adjective). While a super-strict interpretation of 2718:, by which I think is meant "a fully assimiliated loanword that we treat as English, like 'rendezvous' and 'taco' and 'parka 2551:

Are you saying that the book n-gram stats are not perfectly compelling? I see no possible ambiguity. Per the criterion at

4171:

of South Africa); the hyphen is virtually required, but a capital after the hyphen is not; and the "Pieds-noirs" form (two

4456:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

4233:

it is not an ethic group unless "Asian" is an ethnic group. Or in this case "European + Jewish". However it is true that

2513:

consistently capitalized in a substantial majority of independent, reliable sources are capitalized in Knowledge (XXG)."

1051:

ames for peoples and cultures, languages and dialects, nationalities, ethnic and religious groups, demonyms, and the like

1508: 1077: 3551:

Discussion is stuck on the definition of 'loanword" and "proper noun"and this sounds like a linguistics question to me

1004: 3331: 3299: 1698:

Yes and that doesn't change anything. "Pied-Noir" (when used in English sources as a loanword) refers specifically to

4846:

I propose the activation of a bot to change all the "Pied-Noir" and "Pieds-Noirs" terms present in the encyclopedia;

1450:

may wish to comment, I am not certain. But one of them may know for sure and it doesn't seem like anyone here bites.

1029:

From this discussion, I see a definite consensus that the "n" in "noir" should be lowercase: participants noted that

3406:

It's undeniable that in French "pied-noir" (and the plural form "pieds-noirs") is never written with capital letters

3075:

citation required. You might actually know more about this than I do, but right now you are just making assertions.

2928:" both as title of the article and in the article's content. Again, not !voting, just quoting the style guideline. 1533: 849: 4101: 3842: 3787: 3737: 3259: 3190: 2944: 2844: 2220: 2159: 2112: 2065: 2020: 1884: 3826:

for helping to clarify our differences, which seem to have very little or nothing to do with this move request.

2748:

It's still a noun. Does being an ethnonym prevent it from being a loanword or simply a loan if you prefer (like

1971:"Grammarian" is a little more correct, but I was trying not to sound pompous to Americans, who never get taught 861: 3711: 955:, not that it has anything to do with the question at hand. There were no pieds-noirs until after that period. 1057:. I don't see a consensus as to whether "pieds-noirs" should be considered an ethnonym or not; however, while 1014: 50: 4667: 4342: 1073: 3205:. Which is maybe one quantum of evidence that it is not an ethnonym. Is there another plural ethnonym like 2139:

And may I please gently suggest that you check the indents? My response above yours was actually to editor

1054: 1038: 4150:, at the end) is almost unheard of in professional writing (only occurred once), and "ieds-oir" (only one 4004:

It was only used to highlight the fact that being "French" doesn't prevent you from being something else.

591: 3765: 1062: 4578: 4199: 3934: 3857: 3812: 3507: 2735: 2485: 2445: 2093: 1840: 1689: 1649: 1629: 1382: 1327: 1313: 1271: 1241: 1186: 695: 328:

on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

116:

on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

4293: 4281: 4277: 1925: 1058: 1046: 4411: 4387: 3565:

i got your name and all these other from the list of active participants anat WikiProject Linguistics

3167: 2820:

Whatever decision editors come to in this discussion, this title should be in italics in the same way

2573:

1) What ngram stats are you referring to: the one that you supplied or the ones that were supplied by

4859: 4816: 4796: 4689: 4511: 4471: 4220: 4088: 3922: 3829: 3774: 3724: 3656: 3611: 3599: 3246: 3177: 2931: 2831: 2782: 2386: 2207: 2146: 2099: 2052: 2007: 1867: 1601: 1555: 1519: 1219: 1207: 1128: 1108: 981: 941: 4481: 4309: 2190:

Where/When was it decided that the article title should be capitalized? Nobody is speaking up, shrug

1531: 717: 4403: 3371: 1989:

But thanks for the link. Probably I should have just gone that route in the first place. I am out.

1275: 4395: 4264: 4260: 4184: 2418:

That's a useless comparison given that ngram doesn't distinguish between a noun and an adjective.

1017:

after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

4832: 4775: 4755: 4733: 4644: 4539: 4525: 4489: 4423: 4371: 4338: 4297: 4242: 4069: 4029: 4009: 3971: 3900: 3886: 3872: 3755: 3717:

template; however, as I show above, Knowledge (XXG)'s MoS supports capital "P" both in the title

3680: 3665: 3633: 3570: 3556: 3520: 3499: 3488: 3452: 3384: 3367: 3352: 3316: 3282: 3222: 3108: 3094: 3080: 3064: 3047: 3030: 3016: 3008: 2998: 2981: 2907: 2893: 2879: 2864: 2807: 2757: 2690: 2676: 2662: 2640: 2623: 2608: 2590: 2582: 2564: 2542: 2518: 2503: 2459: 2423: 2406: 2368: 2353: 2337: 2272: 2253: 2179: 2130: 2036: 1994: 1980: 1961: 1941: 1825: 1775: 1726: 1707: 1681: 1671: 1637: 1619: 1587: 1540: 1469: 1455: 1434: 1397: 1358: 1341: 1203: 1145: 1104: 960: 952: 915: 867: 4079: 1490:, partly behind paywall but rest of the entry uses it in both all-lowercase and in italic font, 4554:

Cf. my big block of source-usage review in the thread above this. The plural is overwhelmingly

4263:. The same evidence also tell us that it is far from consistently capped in any variation. Per 4127:

consistently, following the bulk of the better-quality RS in English; singular (and adjective)

1304:. Possibly those two are singular because those articles are written to be primarily about the 1101:

in French "pied-noir" (and the plural form "pieds-noirs") is never written with capital letters

4605:

this descriptor does in fact fall under French conventions, then both "pied" and "noir" would

3542: 3503: 3463: 3335: 1477:

The New Oxford American Dictionary (unfortunately behind a paywall, but copy-pasting entry: "

4826: 4714: 4573: 4194: 3930: 3853: 3823: 3808: 3624: 3423: 3307: 2730: 2481: 2441: 2262:

From the erroneous redirect currently on the article title we have the following rationale:

1836: 1685: 1645: 1378: 1323: 1309: 1237: 1197: 1182: 863: 832: 401: 380: 4311: 1955: 1425: 4855: 4812: 4792: 4685: 4507: 4467: 4441: 4379: 4363: 4305: 4216: 3467: 3327: 2778: 2574: 2382: 1597: 1551: 1515: 1443: 1259: 1215: 1124: 977: 937: 645: 3400: 2537:

Determining which version is the most commonly used in English sources is no easy task.

1507:), but admittedly there are at least some that do it otherwise (e.g. "Pieds-Noir(s)" in 882:

was that this is an ethnicity not a foot that is black. Um. Ethnicities are never never

4570:

unattested, across a pretty big number of high-quality (and English-language) sources.

4358:– is that in common use? Yes: might be an ethnonym; No : cannot be an ethnonym. E.g.: 4167:, nor ones with other names that are "just words" in one language or another, e.g. the 3804: 3698: 3644: 3475: 3471: 3413: 3375: 3303: 2495: 2437: 1888: 1871: 1178: 1030: 951:

until you reminded me of this. Incidentally, readers of this page may be interested in

933: 312: 205: 4871: 4828: 4771: 4751: 4729: 4704:

article is largely focused on atrocities committed by the French military during the

4679: 4640: 4535: 4521: 4500: 4485: 4419: 4238: 4065: 4025: 4005: 3967: 3918: 3896: 3882: 3868: 3751: 3676: 3661: 3648: 3629: 3615: 3566: 3552: 3530: 3516: 3484: 3448: 3443: 3380: 3348: 3339: 3312: 3278: 3218: 3104: 3090: 3076: 3060: 3043: 3026: 3012: 2994: 2977: 2903: 2889: 2875: 2860: 2803: 2753: 2749: 2686: 2672: 2658: 2636: 2619: 2604: 2586: 2578: 2560: 2538: 2514: 2499: 2455: 2419: 2402: 2364: 2349: 2333: 2268: 2249: 2175: 2140: 2126: 2032: 1990: 1976: 1957: 1937: 1821: 1771: 1722: 1703: 1667: 1615: 1583: 1536: 1451: 1447: 1430: 1393: 1337: 1255: 1141: 971: 956: 927: 911: 417: 100: 4329:. This is a foreign language term that would be italicised except when considered a 3929:

lowercase in English-language sources (presumably due to the French influence). —⁠ ⁠

1254:. It doesn't seem to exactly be the name of a people in the traditional sense (like 4705: 4367: 3914: 3652: 3607: 3591: 3538: 3511: 3435: 3159:

and, as an aside, I also support the capitalized "P" in the article's content. The

2089: 1716:

More correctly, lowercase "pied-noir" and "Pied-noir" in English only refer to the

1501:

There are various books that seem to follow the same usage (e.g. "pied noir(s)" in

1042: 515: 502: 481: 1529: 3395:

We have a similar issue on the Hawaiʻi wikiproject, where people take pages like

1658:

That may or may not be the case for "Black Foot", but as far as I know, the term

4710: 4407: 4132: 3603: 3479: 3439: 3431: 3343: 3295: 2307: 2047: 1904: 1263: 1231: 1024: 4300:, noting that the term is "often derogatory" would support the similarity with 4436: 4383: 4314: 4164: 3910: 3363: 2122: 1892: 1350: 1267: 1159: 407: 302: 195: 189: 168: 90: 17: 4307: 3703:

it is actually easy to lowercase the first letter of an article title, as in

2472:

by itself is a proper name, but I don't think you're claiming that. See also

4375: 4359: 4168: 4120: 2823: 2723: 1717: 1699: 1663: 1611: 1166: 1090: 611:

Articles about ethnic groups that currently have issues needing resolution:

84: 63: 2918:

Knowledge (XXG):Manual of Style/Capital letters#Peoples and their languages

2727:

academic material about Algeria, and French demographics, and ethnicities.

2244:

either singular or plural. The two most common forms in English books are

3057:

so you're going to assign people to the group whether they like it or not?

2716:

is there any reason why "Pied-Noir" shouldn't be considered as a loanword?

2633:

are you seriously saying you think this is a proper name, or just trolling

605:

Resolve the disparity in importance rankings among different ethnic groups

296: 275: 4268: 4180: 3595: 3427: 2552: 2174:

Apparent you do also. You should probably check that. Because it is not.

1633: 514:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to 1214:. However, you wrote "pied-noirs"; it's correct to write "pieds-noirs". 4848:

from "Pied-Noir" to "pied-noir" and from "Pieds-Noirs" to "pieds-noirs"

4399: 3396: 1300: 1294: 1033:

discourages the capitalization of post-hyphen words unless those words

865: 325: 219: 572: 4787: 4391: 4096: 3837: 3782: 3732: 3254: 3185: 2939: 2839: 2215: 2154: 2107: 2060: 2015: 1641: 1282: 430: 113: 4863: 4836: 4820: 4800: 4779: 4759: 4750:

that the French version of events is missing some details, though.

4737: 4718: 4693: 4671: 4648: 4586: 4543: 4529: 4515: 4493: 4475: 4446: 4427: 4346: 4246: 4224: 4207: 4104: 4073: 4033: 4013: 3975: 3938: 3904: 3890: 3876: 3861: 3845: 3816: 3790: 3759: 3740: 3684: 3669: 3637: 3574: 3560: 3546: 3524: 3492: 3456: 3416: 3388: 3356: 3320: 3286: 3262: 3226: 3193: 3112: 3098: 3084: 3068: 3051: 3034: 3020: 3002: 2985: 2947: 2911: 2897: 2883: 2868: 2847: 2811: 2786: 2761: 2743: 2694: 2680: 2666: 2649:

Of those 3 you linked, the middle one, on the cuisine, mostly uses

2644: 2627: 2612: 2594: 2568: 2546: 2522: 2507: 2489: 2463: 2449: 2427: 2410: 2390: 2372: 2357: 2341: 2276: 2257: 2223: 2183: 2162: 2134: 2115: 2068: 2040: 2023: 1998: 1984: 1965: 1945: 1844: 1829: 1779: 1730: 1711: 1693: 1675: 1653: 1623: 1605: 1591: 1559: 1544: 1523: 1459: 1438: 1401: 1386: 1345: 1331: 1317: 1245: 1223: 1190: 1149: 1132: 1085: 985: 964: 945: 919: 324:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of 1208:

https://dictionnaire.orthodidacte.com/article/etymologie-pied-noir

1170: 1109:

https://dictionnaire.orthodidacte.com/article/etymologie-pied-noir

3292:

From the list of active participants at WikiProject Linguistics;

3704: 2197:

the capitalization of "Pied-Noir" had begun. I just checked the

1896: 1288: 1250:

I am not confident about whether it should be plural or singular

1037:, and furnished evidence showing that lowercase-n spellings are 639: 4414:(not an ethnonym). (And it's not just a missing redirect; see 1204:

https://www.larousse.fr/dictionnaires/francais/pied-noir/60796

1105:

https://www.larousse.fr/dictionnaires/francais/pied-noir/60796

868: 826: 26: 1628:

It's an alternate term for the Native American people of the

976:

yes, I meant that no one seems to agree to change the title.

223:

on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please

1474:

Several Oxford publications also use it in lowercase, e.g.:

217:, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to 1721:

Pied-noir". The "Pied-Noir" capitalization is quite rare.

1610:

Does "Pied-Noir" (in English) refer to anything other than

1292:. Some demonyms are not plural on Knowledge (XXG), such as 429:, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to 4135:

in the lead. Same goes for the broken-French "Pieds-noir"

657:

Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Ethnic groups/Article requests

3822:

I support but editor Elinruby opposes. Thank you, editor

2381:

that 'Pied-Noir' is more commonly used than 'Pied-noir.

2169:

redirect for some reason. If you have a problem with the

4321:

in English. If one applies the principle to use hyphens

2774: 2474:

WP:Manual of Style/Biography § Hyphenation and compounds

1181:, which discourages capital letters after hyphens.) —⁠ ⁠ 1138: 1116: 4788:

Talk:Pieds-noirs#Removal of the "Good article" template

2199: 2194: 1468:

Collins dictionary lists it and shows it as lowercase (

1211: 1112: 1095: 796: 777: 758: 4215:

on capitalisation, but certainly should be plural. --

4595:

I did see it and thank you for the thoughtful answer.

4466:

singular form. Several corrections may be necessary.

1952:

A proper noun is just a schoolteacher word for a name

1377:) in 1961 calling it "this pejorative nickname". —⁠ ⁠ 3923:

New Romantics (song)#Requested move 11 November 2023

3403:

can't back that up. My French is rusty but if this:

3133:, not just ethnic groups. And since you insist, I... 630:

Category:Ethnic groups articles needing reassessment

620:

Category:Ethnic groups articles needing merge action

112:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 2401:, showing "pied-noir" totally dominant in English. 433:

topics of a cross-border nature on Knowledge (XXG).

2773:Guys, if you need it, here is the page in French: 2577:? 2) What makes it compelling (please elaborate)? 1369:is quoted above here on this Talk page as quoting 3796:Aren't you both arguing for a capital 'P'? I too 635:Category:Ethnic groups articles needing attention 625:Category:Ethnic groups articles needing infoboxes 1535:some RS about the subject that use "Pied-Noir". 1140:is what I have to say about this whole thing ;) 1035:would ordinarily be capitalized in running prose 4304:, which is also not consistently capitalised. 1954:I think it's a bit more complicated than that. 1596:No, I don't think so, at least not in French. 723:If it no longer meets these criteria, you can 1487:The Oxford Encyclopedia of the Modern World ( 601:of articles within the scope of this project. 8: 4064:merely calling out the IDHT where I see it. 2046:his car "Lizzie", which is a "proper name". 1934:fr:Liste des gouverneurs généraux du Canada 1883:Uses of the word in English as lower-case: 1511:), so there may be some leeway, if desired. 3162:community consensus in the Manual of Style 3059:They've already been assigned to a group. 1003:The following is a closed discussion of a 737: 690: 615:Category:Unassessed Ethnic groups articles 561: 476: 375: 270: 163: 58: 4958:Social sciences and society good articles 4327:tend to favour dispensing with the hyphen 3921:, which had an RM discussion recorded at 2248:, consistently for over a half century. 1480:noun (plural pieds noirs pronounced same) 708:Social sciences and society good articles 528:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Ethnic groups 3274:If I may make a constructive suggestion: 2454:The rule doesn't apply to proper names. 4562:(capitalization questions aside), with 4520:Yes, you've been pretty bold, I agree. 2991:the pieds-noirs are not an ethnic group 2478:WP:Manual of Style/Titles § Hyphenation 2192:, and I answered you that in 2008 with 1640:. It may also occasionally be used for 1636:– apparently a term still in use. See 478: 377: 272: 165: 60: 4806:Removal of the "Good article" template 4786:I have started a new discussion; see: 4435:—downcase, especially after a hyphen. 3056: 2990: 2715: 2632: 2415: 2311: 2263: 2189: 1951: 1820:Why are you looking at older sources? 1682:Blackfoot language#Language variations 1638:Blackfoot language#Language variations 1050: 1034: 4943:Low-importance Ethnic groups articles 4159:For these reasons, I have to support 3239:Was thinking more along the lines of 1920:"Knowledge (XXG)" is a proper noun. ( 1662:doesn't refer to anything other than 1322:Struck the "leaning" part of it. —⁠ ⁠ 565:WikiProject Ethnic groups open tasks: 7: 4335:it should probably not be italicised 2775:https://fr.wikipedia.org/Pieds-noirs 1252:, and am now leaning toward singular 1117:https://fr.wikipedia.org/Pieds-noirs 1021:The result of the move request was: 508:This article is within the scope of 423:This article is within the scope of 318:This article is within the scope of 211:This article is within the scope of 106:This article is within the scope of 32: 30: 4292:, the former being touched upon by 1930:List_of_governors_general_of_Canada 1212:https://fr.wiktionary.org/pied-noir 1113:https://fr.wiktionary.org/pied-noir 338:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject History 233:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Algeria 49:It is of interest to the following 4948:WikiProject Ethnic groups articles 3768:. Thank you for your consideration 2800:pies-noirs with and without hyphen 531:Template:WikiProject Ethnic groups 439:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Europe 126:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject France 25: 4558:and the singular (and adjective) 3895:The Corsicans are also "French". 2796:pied-noir with and without hyphen 2468:I disagree, unless you're saying 716:. If you can improve it further, 4898:High-importance Algeria articles 4452:The discussion above is closed. 4235:for purposes of the move request 1049:), which guide us to capitalize 831: 694: 571: 501: 480: 410: 400: 379: 305: 295: 274: 198: 188: 167: 93: 83: 62: 31: 4938:GA-Class Ethnic groups articles 4913:Low-importance history articles 4883:High-importance France articles 4700:The material just added to the 3213:by singularizing and appending 3209:that you cannot transform into 2635:please comment on the content. 548:This article has been rated as 459:This article has been rated as 358:This article has been rated as 253:This article has been rated as 146:This article has been rated as 4928:Low-importance Europe articles 2048:Here you go; this explains it. 1069:closed by non-admin page mover 704:has been listed as one of the 1: 4953:Knowledge (XXG) good articles 4571: 4192: 4142:For additional evidence, see 2728: 1528:For what it's worth, here are 522:and see a list of open tasks. 332:and see a list of open tasks. 120:and see a list of open tasks. 4963:Old requests for peer review 4918:WikiProject History articles 4903:WikiProject Algeria articles 4888:All WikiProject France pages 886:capitalized in French. See: 341:Template:WikiProject History 236:Template:WikiProject Algeria 4933:WikiProject Europe articles 4080:I just don't agree with you 2377:Google Books N'gram Viewer 1895:(both English and French), 442:Template:WikiProject Europe 129:Template:WikiProject France 4979: 4864:06:08, 5 August 2024 (UTC) 4649:04:03, 17 April 2024 (UTC) 4587:04:54, 16 April 2024 (UTC) 4566:barely ever attested, and 4544:18:45, 15 April 2024 (UTC) 4530:02:09, 15 April 2024 (UTC) 4516:02:06, 15 April 2024 (UTC) 4494:00:45, 15 April 2024 (UTC) 4476:17:39, 11 April 2024 (UTC) 4428:05:07, 23 April 2024 (UTC) 4347:01:14, 23 April 2024 (UTC) 4323:when necessary for clarity 4267:and the general advice at 4247:08:29, 19 April 2024 (UTC) 4225:13:05, 16 April 2024 (UTC) 4208:23:34, 15 April 2024 (UTC) 4144:this Google Scholar search 4105:02:08, 16 April 2024 (UTC) 4074:23:21, 15 April 2024 (UTC) 4034:09:26, 20 April 2024 (UTC) 4014:12:22, 20 April 2024 (UTC) 3976:23:18, 23 April 2024 (UTC) 3939:09:04, 20 April 2024 (UTC) 3905:00:38, 20 April 2024 (UTC) 3891:20:06, 19 April 2024 (UTC) 3877:20:02, 19 April 2024 (UTC) 3862:15:21, 19 April 2024 (UTC) 3846:06:33, 19 April 2024 (UTC) 3817:05:12, 19 April 2024 (UTC) 3791:22:43, 15 April 2024 (UTC) 3760:22:30, 15 April 2024 (UTC) 3741:22:16, 15 April 2024 (UTC) 3685:21:40, 15 April 2024 (UTC) 3670:21:25, 15 April 2024 (UTC) 3638:21:18, 15 April 2024 (UTC) 3575:21:06, 15 April 2024 (UTC) 3561:21:04, 15 April 2024 (UTC) 3547:21:00, 15 April 2024 (UTC) 3525:20:52, 15 April 2024 (UTC) 3493:20:44, 15 April 2024 (UTC) 3457:20:38, 15 April 2024 (UTC) 3417:20:28, 15 April 2024 (UTC) 3389:20:32, 15 April 2024 (UTC) 3357:20:27, 15 April 2024 (UTC) 3321:20:22, 15 April 2024 (UTC) 3287:18:50, 15 April 2024 (UTC) 3263:08:52, 23 April 2024 (UTC) 3227:04:41, 23 April 2024 (UTC) 3194:21:46, 15 April 2024 (UTC) 3113:23:37, 15 April 2024 (UTC) 3099:23:28, 15 April 2024 (UTC) 3085:23:24, 15 April 2024 (UTC) 3069:22:42, 15 April 2024 (UTC) 3052:22:35, 15 April 2024 (UTC) 3035:22:17, 15 April 2024 (UTC) 3021:22:12, 15 April 2024 (UTC) 3003:21:54, 15 April 2024 (UTC) 2986:18:40, 15 April 2024 (UTC) 2948:18:26, 15 April 2024 (UTC) 2912:17:13, 15 April 2024 (UTC) 2898:16:02, 15 April 2024 (UTC) 2884:15:59, 15 April 2024 (UTC) 2869:14:37, 15 April 2024 (UTC) 2848:09:32, 15 April 2024 (UTC) 2812:22:24, 14 April 2024 (UTC) 2787:13:22, 14 April 2024 (UTC) 2762:23:55, 15 April 2024 (UTC) 2744:23:45, 15 April 2024 (UTC) 2695:00:44, 15 April 2024 (UTC) 2681:22:43, 14 April 2024 (UTC) 2667:22:37, 14 April 2024 (UTC) 2645:22:49, 14 April 2024 (UTC) 2628:22:13, 14 April 2024 (UTC) 2613:22:10, 14 April 2024 (UTC) 2595:16:19, 14 April 2024 (UTC) 2569:16:06, 14 April 2024 (UTC) 2547:15:07, 14 April 2024 (UTC) 2523:00:44, 15 April 2024 (UTC) 2508:15:16, 14 April 2024 (UTC) 2490:15:10, 14 April 2024 (UTC) 2464:15:01, 14 April 2024 (UTC) 2450:05:16, 14 April 2024 (UTC) 2428:16:28, 14 April 2024 (UTC) 2411:15:53, 14 April 2024 (UTC) 2391:04:04, 14 April 2024 (UTC) 2373:01:28, 14 April 2024 (UTC) 2358:17:07, 13 April 2024 (UTC) 2342:05:44, 13 April 2024 (UTC) 2277:01:38, 13 April 2024 (UTC) 2258:23:49, 12 April 2024 (UTC) 2224:05:06, 13 April 2024 (UTC) 2184:02:57, 13 April 2024 (UTC) 2163:02:01, 13 April 2024 (UTC) 2135:01:29, 13 April 2024 (UTC) 2116:20:54, 12 April 2024 (UTC) 2069:19:59, 12 April 2024 (UTC) 2041:19:41, 12 April 2024 (UTC) 2024:19:22, 12 April 2024 (UTC) 1999:19:18, 12 April 2024 (UTC) 1985:19:15, 12 April 2024 (UTC) 1966:19:06, 12 April 2024 (UTC) 1946:18:55, 12 April 2024 (UTC) 1845:03:29, 15 April 2024 (UTC) 1830:16:26, 14 April 2024 (UTC) 1780:05:37, 23 April 2024 (UTC) 1731:16:06, 14 April 2024 (UTC) 1712:15:04, 14 April 2024 (UTC) 1694:15:01, 14 April 2024 (UTC) 1676:14:59, 14 April 2024 (UTC) 1654:05:25, 14 April 2024 (UTC) 1624:17:11, 12 April 2024 (UTC) 1606:15:29, 12 April 2024 (UTC) 1592:14:06, 12 April 2024 (UTC) 1560:18:17, 12 April 2024 (UTC) 1545:17:22, 12 April 2024 (UTC) 1524:16:33, 12 April 2024 (UTC) 1460:04:43, 12 April 2024 (UTC) 1439:03:52, 12 April 2024 (UTC) 1402:16:25, 14 April 2024 (UTC) 1387:15:49, 14 April 2024 (UTC) 1346:15:31, 14 April 2024 (UTC) 1332:15:25, 14 April 2024 (UTC) 1318:05:49, 14 April 2024 (UTC) 1246:00:19, 12 April 2024 (UTC) 1224:23:40, 11 April 2024 (UTC) 1191:21:12, 11 April 2024 (UTC) 1150:18:09, 11 April 2024 (UTC) 1133:17:16, 11 April 2024 (UTC) 1059:cleaning up after the move 986:17:56, 11 April 2024 (UTC) 965:17:46, 11 April 2024 (UTC) 946:17:32, 11 April 2024 (UTC) 554:project's importance scale 465:project's importance scale 364:project's importance scale 259:project's importance scale 152:project's importance scale 4908:GA-Class history articles 4893:GA-Class Algeria articles 4837:09:30, 24 July 2024 (UTC) 4821:07:53, 22 July 2024 (UTC) 4801:07:57, 22 July 2024 (UTC) 4780:06:45, 22 July 2024 (UTC) 4760:13:02, 24 July 2024 (UTC) 4738:05:55, 22 July 2024 (UTC) 4719:22:06, 20 July 2024 (UTC) 4694:21:32, 20 July 2024 (UTC) 4672:16:43, 19 July 2024 (UTC) 2246:pied-noir and pieds-noirs 1885:Oxford English Dictionary 1367:Oxford English Dictionary 920:21:50, 21 June 2023 (UTC) 817: 740: 736: 578:WikiProject Ethnic groups 560: 547: 511:WikiProject Ethnic groups 496: 458: 395: 357: 290: 252: 183: 145: 78: 57: 4923:GA-Class Europe articles 4878:GA-Class France articles 4454:Please do not modify it. 4325:, the mixed usage would 2314:after I had *just* said 1582:an English proper noun? 1086:16:32, 15 May 2024 (UTC) 1010:Please do not modify it. 934:Talk:Pied-Noir#Lowercase 4825:See instructions here: 4447:07:01, 2 May 2024 (UTC) 2671:What about the others? 2655:La Cuisine Pied Noir 1975:formal grammar at all. 1514:I hope that's helpful, 1121:I propose the lowercase 3332:InformationvsInjustice 3300:Justanotherinternetguy 2301:What I wanted to know 1926:fr: gouverneur-général 534:Ethnic groups articles 39:This article is rated 3746:you "show" nada sir, 2601:how about these stats 2094:Blackfoot Confederacy 1630:Blackfoot Confederacy 1336:It's not derogatory. 714:good article criteria 43:on Knowledge (XXG)'s 3798:support a capital 'P 785:Good article nominee 4406:(not an ethnonym); 4398:(not an ethnonym); 4390:(not an ethnonym); 4352:Support Pieds-noirs 4256:Support Pieds-noirs 4117:Support Pieds-noirs 3719:and in running text 3202:no Pied-noir people 3153:the proposed title 2993:according to whom? 2416:The real comparison 1936:? Hope that helps. 670:discuss these tasks 576:Here are some open 321:WikiProject History 214:WikiProject Algeria 4629:What do you think? 4372:Azerbaijani people 4298:Collins definition 3009:Regency of Algiers 2794:without smoothing 2555:, this is clearly 2090:WP Manual of Style 1074:ModernDayTrilobite 953:Regency of Algiers 741:Article milestones 653:Start an article: 426:WikiProject Europe 109:WikiProject France 45:content assessment 4657:French propaganda 4284:but more akin to 4107: 3848: 3793: 3743: 3696: 3265: 3196: 2950: 2850: 2792:More n-gram stats 2226: 2165: 2118: 2071: 2026: 1483: 1355:Often Disparaging 1072: 874: 873: 855: 854: 825: 824: 813: 812: 778:February 18, 2008 732: 689: 688: 685: 684: 681: 680: 677: 676: 475: 474: 471: 470: 374: 373: 370: 369: 269: 268: 265: 264: 162: 161: 158: 157: 16:(Redirected from 4970: 4683: 4585: 4504: 4444: 4412:Pied-noir people 4388:Manichean people 4206: 4103: 4099: 4091: 3844: 3840: 3832: 3801: 3789: 3785: 3777: 3739: 3735: 3727: 3716: 3710: 3707:, by use of the 3702: 3694: 3660: 3628: 3619: 3535:Why am I tagged? 3515: 3508:Mr. Stradivarius 3483: 3447: 3379: 3347: 3311: 3261: 3257: 3249: 3204: 3192: 3188: 3180: 2946: 2942: 2934: 2846: 2842: 2834: 2742: 2721: 2222: 2218: 2210: 2202: 2195: 2171:English language 2161: 2157: 2149: 2114: 2110: 2102: 2067: 2063: 2055: 2022: 2018: 2010: 1868:Blackfoot Nation 1478: 1363:often derogatory 1201: 1098: 1066: 1012: 975: 931: 869: 846: 845: 835: 827: 818:Current status: 799: 780: 761: 759:January 25, 2008 738: 721: 698: 691: 599:on the talk page 596: 590: 575: 562: 536: 535: 532: 529: 526: 505: 498: 497: 492: 484: 477: 447: 446: 443: 440: 437: 420: 415: 414: 413: 404: 397: 396: 391: 383: 376: 346: 345: 344:history articles 342: 339: 336: 315: 310: 309: 308: 299: 292: 291: 286: 278: 271: 241: 240: 239:Algeria articles 237: 234: 231: 225:join the project 208: 203: 202: 201: 192: 185: 184: 179: 171: 164: 134: 133: 130: 127: 124: 103: 98: 97: 96: 87: 80: 79: 74: 66: 59: 42: 36: 35: 34: 27: 21: 4978: 4977: 4973: 4972: 4971: 4969: 4968: 4967: 4868: 4867: 4844: 4808: 4677: 4659: 4498: 4463: 4458: 4457: 4442: 4380:Coloured people 4364:Corsican people 4097: 4089: 3838: 3830: 3799: 3783: 3775: 3733: 3725: 3714: 3712:Lowercase title 3708: 3693: 3657:AudiblySilenced 3642: 3622: 3612:Sasuke Sarutobi 3600:Johanna-Hypatia 3589: 3497: 3461: 3421: 3361: 3325: 3293: 3255: 3247: 3200: 3186: 3178: 2940: 2932: 2840: 2832: 2719: 2559:a proper name. 2216: 2208: 2198: 2193: 2155: 2147: 2108: 2100: 2086:Knowledge (XXG) 2061: 2053: 2016: 2008: 1195: 1094: 1008: 998: 969: 925: 879: 870: 864: 840: 795: 776: 757: 646:Peruvian people 594: 588: 533: 530: 527: 524: 523: 490: 445:Europe articles 444: 441: 438: 435: 434: 416: 411: 409: 389: 343: 340: 337: 334: 333: 311: 306: 304: 284: 255:High-importance 238: 235: 232: 229: 228: 204: 199: 197: 178:High‑importance 177: 148:High-importance 132:France articles 131: 128: 125: 122: 121: 99: 94: 92: 73:High‑importance 72: 40: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 4976: 4974: 4966: 4965: 4960: 4955: 4950: 4945: 4940: 4935: 4930: 4925: 4920: 4915: 4910: 4905: 4900: 4895: 4890: 4885: 4880: 4870: 4869: 4843: 4840: 4807: 4804: 4783: 4782: 4768: 4767: 4766: 4765: 4764: 4763: 4762: 4726: 4725: 4724: 4723: 4722: 4721: 4658: 4655: 4654: 4653: 4652: 4651: 4633: 4632: 4631: 4630: 4624: 4623: 4622: 4621: 4614: 4613: 4612: 4611: 4599: 4598: 4597: 4596: 4590: 4589: 4552: 4551: 4550: 4549: 4548: 4547: 4546: 4462: 4459: 4451: 4450: 4449: 4430: 4349: 4252: 4251: 4250: 4249: 4228: 4227: 4210: 4138: 4113: 4112: 4111: 4110: 4109: 4108: 4090:P.I. Ellsworth 4059: 4058: 4057: 4056: 4055: 4054: 4053: 4052: 4051: 4050: 4049: 4048: 4047: 4046: 4045: 4044: 4043: 4042: 4041: 4040: 4039: 4038: 4037: 4036: 4018: 4017: 4016: 3965: 3964: 3963: 3962: 3961: 3960: 3959: 3958: 3957: 3956: 3955: 3954: 3953: 3952: 3951: 3950: 3949: 3948: 3947: 3946: 3945: 3944: 3943: 3942: 3831:P.I. Ellsworth 3805:MOS:PEOPLELANG 3776:P.I. Ellsworth 3726:P.I. Ellsworth 3691: 3690: 3689: 3688: 3687: 3620: 3587: 3586: 3585: 3584: 3583: 3582: 3581: 3580: 3579: 3578: 3577: 3536: 3533: 3409: 3408: 3407: 3393: 3392: 3391: 3372:Newroderick895 3271: 3270: 3269: 3268: 3267: 3266: 3248:P.I. Ellsworth 3232: 3231: 3230: 3229: 3179:P.I. Ellsworth 3147: 3146: 3145: 3144: 3143: 3142: 3141: 3140: 3139: 3138: 3137: 3136: 3135: 3134: 3127: 3126: 3125: 3124: 3123: 3122: 3121: 3120: 3119: 3118: 3117: 3116: 3115: 3039: 3038: 3037: 2974: 2960: 2959: 2958: 2957: 2956: 2955: 2954: 2953: 2952: 2951: 2933:P.I. Ellsworth 2852: 2851: 2833:P.I. Ellsworth 2771: 2770: 2769: 2768: 2767: 2766: 2765: 2764: 2713: 2712: 2711: 2710: 2709: 2708: 2707: 2706: 2705: 2704: 2703: 2702: 2701: 2700: 2699: 2698: 2697: 2630: 2535: 2534: 2533: 2532: 2531: 2530: 2529: 2528: 2527: 2526: 2525: 2496:MOS:HYPHENCAPS 2438:MOS:HYPHENCAPS 2434: 2433: 2432: 2431: 2430: 2346: 2345: 2344: 2325: 2324: 2323: 2322: 2321: 2320: 2294: 2293: 2292: 2291: 2290: 2289: 2280: 2279: 2260: 2238: 2237: 2236: 2235: 2234: 2233: 2232: 2231: 2230: 2229: 2228: 2227: 2209:P.I. Ellsworth 2148:P.I. Ellsworth 2101:P.I. Ellsworth 2082: 2081: 2080: 2079: 2078: 2077: 2076: 2075: 2074: 2073: 2072: 2054:P.I. Ellsworth 2009:P.I. Ellsworth 2001: 1915: 1914: 1913: 1912: 1900: 1889:New York Times 1878: 1877: 1876: 1875: 1872:Globe and Mail 1863: 1862: 1861: 1860: 1859: 1858: 1857: 1856: 1855: 1854: 1853: 1852: 1851: 1850: 1849: 1848: 1847: 1801: 1800: 1799: 1798: 1797: 1796: 1795: 1794: 1793: 1792: 1791: 1790: 1789: 1788: 1787: 1786: 1785: 1784: 1783: 1782: 1748: 1747: 1746: 1745: 1744: 1743: 1742: 1741: 1740: 1739: 1738: 1737: 1736: 1735: 1734: 1733: 1575: 1574: 1573: 1572: 1571: 1570: 1569: 1568: 1567: 1566: 1565: 1564: 1563: 1562: 1512: 1499: 1498: 1497: 1496: 1495: 1485: 1472: 1417: 1416: 1415: 1414: 1413: 1412: 1411: 1410: 1409: 1408: 1407: 1406: 1405: 1404: 1351:Dictionary.com 1334: 1272:Sauria Paharia 1179:MOS:HYPHENCAPS 1088: 1031:MOS:HYPHENCAPS 1020: 1019: 1005:requested move 999: 997: 994: 993: 992: 991: 990: 989: 988: 878: 877:Capitalization 875: 872: 871: 866: 862: 860: 857: 856: 853: 852: 842: 841: 836: 830: 823: 822: 815: 814: 811: 810: 807: 800: 792: 791: 788: 781: 773: 772: 769: 762: 754: 753: 750: 747: 743: 742: 734: 733: 699: 687: 686: 683: 682: 679: 678: 675: 674: 666:edit this list 662: 661: 660: 659: 651: 650: 649: 642: 637: 632: 627: 622: 617: 609: 608: 607: 602: 567: 566: 558: 557: 550:Low-importance 546: 540: 539: 537: 520:the discussion 506: 494: 493: 491:Low‑importance 485: 473: 472: 469: 468: 461:Low-importance 457: 451: 450: 448: 422: 421: 405: 393: 392: 390:Low‑importance 384: 372: 371: 368: 367: 360:Low-importance 356: 350: 349: 347: 330:the discussion 317: 316: 313:History portal 300: 288: 287: 285:Low‑importance 279: 267: 266: 263: 262: 251: 245: 244: 242: 210: 209: 206:Algeria portal 193: 181: 180: 172: 160: 159: 156: 155: 144: 138: 137: 135: 118:the discussion 105: 104: 88: 76: 75: 67: 55: 54: 48: 37: 24: 18:Talk:Pied-Noir 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 4975: 4964: 4961: 4959: 4956: 4954: 4951: 4949: 4946: 4944: 4941: 4939: 4936: 4934: 4931: 4929: 4926: 4924: 4921: 4919: 4916: 4914: 4911: 4909: 4906: 4904: 4901: 4899: 4896: 4894: 4891: 4889: 4886: 4884: 4881: 4879: 4876: 4875: 4873: 4866: 4865: 4861: 4857: 4853: 4849: 4841: 4839: 4838: 4834: 4830: 4827: 4823: 4822: 4818: 4814: 4805: 4803: 4802: 4798: 4794: 4790: 4789: 4781: 4777: 4773: 4769: 4761: 4757: 4753: 4748: 4747: 4746: 4745: 4744: 4743: 4742: 4741: 4740: 4739: 4735: 4731: 4720: 4716: 4712: 4707: 4703: 4699: 4698: 4697: 4696: 4695: 4691: 4687: 4681: 4676: 4675: 4674: 4673: 4669: 4665: 4664:31.20.246.162 4656: 4650: 4646: 4642: 4637: 4636: 4635: 4634: 4628: 4627: 4626: 4625: 4618: 4617: 4616: 4615: 4608: 4603: 4602: 4601: 4600: 4594: 4593: 4592: 4591: 4588: 4583: 4580: 4577: 4576: 4569: 4565: 4561: 4557: 4553: 4545: 4541: 4537: 4533: 4532: 4531: 4527: 4523: 4519: 4518: 4517: 4513: 4509: 4502: 4497: 4496: 4495: 4491: 4487: 4483: 4480: 4479: 4478: 4477: 4473: 4469: 4460: 4455: 4448: 4445: 4440: 4439: 4434: 4431: 4429: 4425: 4421: 4417: 4413: 4409: 4405: 4404:Ohioan people 4401: 4397: 4393: 4389: 4385: 4381: 4377: 4373: 4369: 4365: 4361: 4357: 4353: 4350: 4348: 4344: 4340: 4339:Cinderella157 4336: 4332: 4328: 4324: 4320: 4316: 4312: 4310: 4308: 4306: 4303: 4299: 4295: 4291: 4287: 4283: 4279: 4274: 4270: 4266: 4262: 4257: 4254: 4253: 4248: 4244: 4240: 4236: 4232: 4231: 4230: 4229: 4226: 4222: 4218: 4214: 4211: 4209: 4204: 4201: 4198: 4197: 4190: 4186: 4182: 4178: 4174: 4170: 4166: 4162: 4158: 4156: 4153: 4149: 4145: 4141: 4136: 4134: 4130: 4126: 4122: 4118: 4115: 4114: 4106: 4102: 4100: 4094: 4093: 4092: 4085: 4081: 4077: 4076: 4075: 4071: 4067: 4063: 4062: 4061: 4060: 4035: 4031: 4027: 4023: 4019: 4015: 4011: 4007: 4003: 4002: 4001: 4000: 3999: 3998: 3997: 3996: 3995: 3994: 3993: 3992: 3991: 3990: 3989: 3988: 3987: 3986: 3985: 3984: 3983: 3982: 3981: 3980: 3979: 3978: 3977: 3973: 3969: 3940: 3936: 3932: 3928: 3924: 3920: 3919:New Romantics 3916: 3912: 3908: 3907: 3906: 3902: 3898: 3894: 3893: 3892: 3888: 3884: 3880: 3879: 3878: 3874: 3870: 3865: 3864: 3863: 3859: 3855: 3850: 3849: 3847: 3843: 3841: 3835: 3834: 3833: 3825: 3820: 3819: 3818: 3814: 3810: 3806: 3802: 3795: 3794: 3792: 3788: 3786: 3780: 3779: 3778: 3771: 3767: 3763: 3762: 3761: 3757: 3753: 3749: 3745: 3744: 3742: 3738: 3736: 3730: 3729: 3728: 3720: 3713: 3706: 3700: 3692: 3686: 3682: 3678: 3673: 3672: 3671: 3667: 3663: 3658: 3654: 3650: 3646: 3641: 3640: 3639: 3635: 3631: 3626: 3621: 3617: 3613: 3609: 3605: 3601: 3597: 3593: 3588: 3576: 3572: 3568: 3564: 3563: 3562: 3558: 3554: 3550: 3549: 3548: 3544: 3540: 3537: 3534: 3532: 3528: 3527: 3526: 3522: 3518: 3513: 3509: 3505: 3501: 3500:MacedonianBoy 3496: 3495: 3494: 3490: 3486: 3481: 3477: 3473: 3469: 3465: 3460: 3459: 3458: 3454: 3450: 3445: 3441: 3437: 3433: 3429: 3425: 3420: 3419: 3418: 3415: 3410: 3405: 3404: 3402: 3398: 3394: 3390: 3386: 3382: 3377: 3373: 3369: 3368:Francis Tyers 3365: 3360: 3359: 3358: 3354: 3350: 3345: 3341: 3337: 3333: 3329: 3324: 3323: 3322: 3318: 3314: 3309: 3305: 3301: 3297: 3291: 3290: 3289: 3288: 3284: 3280: 3275: 3264: 3260: 3258: 3252: 3251: 3250: 3242: 3238: 3237: 3236: 3235: 3234: 3233: 3228: 3224: 3220: 3216: 3212: 3211:Fooian people 3208: 3203: 3198: 3197: 3195: 3191: 3189: 3183: 3182: 3181: 3173: 3172: 3170: 3164: 3163: 3158: 3157: 3152: 3149: 3148: 3132: 3128: 3114: 3110: 3106: 3102: 3101: 3100: 3096: 3092: 3088: 3087: 3086: 3082: 3078: 3074: 3073: 3072: 3071: 3070: 3066: 3062: 3058: 3055: 3054: 3053: 3049: 3045: 3040: 3036: 3032: 3028: 3024: 3023: 3022: 3018: 3014: 3010: 3006: 3005: 3004: 3000: 2996: 2992: 2989: 2988: 2987: 2983: 2979: 2975: 2972: 2971: 2970: 2969: 2968: 2967: 2966: 2965: 2964: 2963: 2962: 2961: 2949: 2945: 2943: 2937: 2936: 2935: 2927: 2923: 2919: 2915: 2914: 2913: 2909: 2905: 2901: 2900: 2899: 2895: 2891: 2887: 2886: 2885: 2881: 2877: 2872: 2871: 2870: 2866: 2862: 2857: 2854: 2853: 2849: 2845: 2843: 2837: 2836: 2835: 2827: 2826: 2825: 2819: 2816: 2815: 2814: 2813: 2809: 2805: 2801: 2797: 2793: 2789: 2788: 2784: 2780: 2776: 2763: 2759: 2755: 2751: 2747: 2746: 2745: 2740: 2737: 2734: 2733: 2725: 2717: 2714: 2696: 2692: 2688: 2684: 2683: 2682: 2678: 2674: 2670: 2669: 2668: 2664: 2660: 2656: 2652: 2648: 2647: 2646: 2642: 2638: 2634: 2631: 2629: 2625: 2621: 2616: 2615: 2614: 2610: 2606: 2602: 2598: 2597: 2596: 2592: 2588: 2584: 2580: 2576: 2572: 2571: 2570: 2566: 2562: 2558: 2554: 2550: 2549: 2548: 2544: 2540: 2536: 2524: 2520: 2516: 2511: 2510: 2509: 2505: 2501: 2497: 2493: 2492: 2491: 2487: 2483: 2479: 2475: 2471: 2467: 2466: 2465: 2461: 2457: 2453: 2452: 2451: 2447: 2443: 2439: 2435: 2429: 2425: 2421: 2417: 2414: 2413: 2412: 2408: 2404: 2400: 2396: 2395: 2394: 2393: 2392: 2388: 2384: 2380: 2376: 2375: 2374: 2370: 2366: 2361: 2360: 2359: 2355: 2351: 2347: 2343: 2339: 2335: 2331: 2330: 2329: 2328: 2327: 2326: 2317: 2313: 2309: 2304: 2300: 2299: 2298: 2297: 2296: 2295: 2286: 2285: 2284: 2283: 2282: 2281: 2278: 2274: 2270: 2266: 2261: 2259: 2255: 2251: 2247: 2243: 2240: 2239: 2225: 2221: 2219: 2213: 2212: 2211: 2201: 2191: 2187: 2186: 2185: 2181: 2177: 2172: 2167: 2166: 2164: 2160: 2158: 2152: 2151: 2150: 2142: 2138: 2137: 2136: 2132: 2128: 2123: 2120: 2119: 2117: 2113: 2111: 2105: 2104: 2103: 2095: 2091: 2087: 2083: 2070: 2066: 2064: 2058: 2057: 2056: 2049: 2044: 2043: 2042: 2038: 2034: 2029: 2028: 2025: 2021: 2019: 2013: 2012: 2011: 2002: 2000: 1996: 1992: 1988: 1987: 1986: 1982: 1978: 1974: 1969: 1968: 1967: 1963: 1959: 1956: 1953: 1950: 1949: 1947: 1943: 1939: 1935: 1931: 1927: 1923: 1922:Un nom propre 1919: 1918: 1917: 1916: 1910: 1906: 1901: 1898: 1894: 1890: 1886: 1882: 1881: 1880: 1879: 1873: 1869: 1864: 1846: 1842: 1838: 1833: 1832: 1831: 1827: 1823: 1819: 1818: 1817: 1816: 1815: 1814: 1813: 1812: 1811: 1810: 1809: 1808: 1807: 1806: 1805: 1804: 1803: 1802: 1781: 1777: 1773: 1768: 1767: 1766: 1765: 1764: 1763: 1762: 1761: 1760: 1759: 1758: 1757: 1756: 1755: 1754: 1753: 1752: 1751: 1750: 1749: 1732: 1728: 1724: 1719: 1715: 1714: 1713: 1709: 1705: 1701: 1697: 1696: 1695: 1691: 1687: 1683: 1680:Did you read 1679: 1678: 1677: 1673: 1669: 1665: 1661: 1657: 1656: 1655: 1651: 1647: 1643: 1639: 1635: 1631: 1627: 1626: 1625: 1621: 1617: 1613: 1609: 1608: 1607: 1603: 1599: 1595: 1594: 1593: 1589: 1585: 1581: 1577: 1576: 1561: 1557: 1553: 1548: 1547: 1546: 1542: 1538: 1534: 1532: 1530: 1527: 1526: 1525: 1521: 1517: 1513: 1510: 1506: 1503: 1500: 1493: 1489: 1486: 1481: 1476: 1475: 1473: 1470: 1467: 1466: 1463: 1462: 1461: 1457: 1453: 1449: 1445: 1442: 1441: 1440: 1436: 1432: 1427: 1423: 1422: 1421: 1420: 1419: 1418: 1403: 1399: 1395: 1390: 1389: 1388: 1384: 1380: 1376: 1372: 1368: 1364: 1360: 1356: 1352: 1349: 1348: 1347: 1343: 1339: 1335: 1333: 1329: 1325: 1321: 1320: 1319: 1315: 1311: 1307: 1303: 1302: 1297: 1296: 1291: 1290: 1285: 1284: 1279: 1278: 1273: 1269: 1265: 1261: 1257: 1253: 1249: 1248: 1247: 1243: 1239: 1235: 1234: 1233: 1227: 1226: 1225: 1221: 1217: 1213: 1209: 1205: 1199: 1194: 1193: 1192: 1188: 1184: 1180: 1176: 1172: 1168: 1164: 1163: 1162: 1161: 1156:Pluralize as 1154: 1153: 1152: 1151: 1147: 1143: 1139: 1135: 1134: 1130: 1126: 1122: 1118: 1114: 1110: 1106: 1102: 1097: 1092: 1087: 1083: 1079: 1075: 1070: 1064: 1060: 1056: 1055:WP:COMMONNAME 1052: 1048: 1044: 1040: 1036: 1032: 1028: 1026: 1018: 1016: 1011: 1006: 1001: 1000: 995: 987: 983: 979: 973: 968: 967: 966: 962: 958: 954: 949: 948: 947: 943: 939: 935: 929: 924: 923: 922: 921: 917: 913: 907: 905: 901: 897: 893: 889: 885: 876: 859: 858: 851: 848: 847: 844: 843: 839: 834: 829: 828: 821: 816: 808: 806: 805: 801: 798: 794: 793: 789: 787: 786: 782: 779: 775: 774: 770: 768: 767: 763: 760: 756: 755: 751: 748: 745: 744: 739: 735: 730: 728: 727: 719: 715: 711: 710: 709: 703: 700: 697: 693: 692: 673: 671: 667: 664:Feel free to 658: 655: 654: 652: 648: 647: 643: 641: 638: 636: 633: 631: 628: 626: 623: 621: 618: 616: 613: 612: 610: 606: 603: 600: 593: 592:Ethnic groups 586: 585: 583: 582: 581: 579: 574: 569: 568: 564: 563: 559: 555: 551: 545: 542: 541: 538: 525:Ethnic groups 521: 517: 516:ethnic groups 513: 512: 507: 504: 500: 499: 495: 489: 488:Ethnic groups 486: 483: 479: 466: 462: 456: 453: 452: 449: 432: 428: 427: 419: 418:Europe portal 408: 406: 403: 399: 398: 394: 388: 385: 382: 378: 365: 361: 355: 352: 351: 348: 331: 327: 323: 322: 314: 303: 301: 298: 294: 293: 289: 283: 280: 277: 273: 260: 256: 250: 247: 246: 243: 226: 222: 221: 216: 215: 207: 196: 194: 191: 187: 186: 182: 176: 173: 170: 166: 153: 149: 143: 140: 139: 136: 119: 115: 111: 110: 102: 101:France portal 91: 89: 86: 82: 81: 77: 71: 68: 65: 61: 56: 52: 46: 38: 29: 28: 19: 4856:JacktheBrown 4851: 4847: 4845: 4824: 4813:JacktheBrown 4809: 4793:JacktheBrown 4785: 4784: 4727: 4706:Algerian War 4701: 4686:JacktheBrown 4660: 4606: 4574: 4567: 4563: 4559: 4555: 4508:JacktheBrown 4468:JacktheBrown 4464: 4453: 4437: 4432: 4396:Arian people 4368:Azerbaijanis 4355: 4351: 4334: 4330: 4326: 4322: 4318: 4301: 4289: 4285: 4272: 4255: 4234: 4212: 4195: 4188: 4176: 4172: 4160: 4157: 4155: 4151: 4147: 4140: 4128: 4124: 4116: 4087: 4086: 4083: 4078:I did hear, 4021: 3927:consistently 3926: 3915:New Romantic 3828: 3827: 3797: 3773: 3772: 3769: 3747: 3723: 3722: 3718: 3504:Swfarnsworth 3336:Rashad Ullah 3273: 3272: 3245: 3244: 3241:these ngrams 3214: 3210: 3206: 3176: 3175: 3168: 3166: 3160: 3155: 3154: 3150: 3131:and the like 3130: 2930: 2929: 2925: 2921: 2855: 2830: 2829: 2822: 2821: 2817: 2791: 2790: 2779:JacktheBrown 2772: 2731: 2654: 2650: 2556: 2469: 2315: 2302: 2241: 2206: 2205: 2170: 2145: 2144: 2098: 2097: 2085: 2051: 2050: 2006: 2005: 1972: 1921: 1908: 1905:proper nouns 1659: 1598:JacktheBrown 1579: 1491: 1479: 1375:London Times 1374: 1373:(presumably 1370: 1366: 1362: 1354: 1305: 1299: 1293: 1287: 1281: 1276: 1251: 1230: 1229: 1228:I see, then 1216:JacktheBrown 1174: 1158: 1157: 1155: 1136: 1125:JacktheBrown 1120: 1100: 1089: 1063:WP:BARTENDER 1043:MOS:PEOPLANG 1022: 1009: 1002: 978:JacktheBrown 938:JacktheBrown 908: 903: 899: 895: 891: 887: 883: 880: 837: 820:Good article 819: 802: 797:May 14, 2008 784: 783: 764: 724: 722: 718:please do so 706: 705: 701: 663: 644: 598: 584:Meta-tasks: 570: 549: 509: 460: 424: 359: 319: 254: 218: 212: 147: 107: 51:WikiProjects 4575:SMcCandlish 4556:Pieds-noirs 4408:Pieds-noirs 4294:WP:RACECAPS 4282:WP:RACECAPS 4278:WP:RACECAPS 4196:SMcCandlish 4161:Pieds-noirs 4133:MOS:BOLDSYN 4125:Pieds-noirs 3931:BarrelProof 3854:BarrelProof 3824:BarrelProof 3809:BarrelProof 3625:Joeystanley 3424:Johndburger 3308:Visioncurve 2828:is styled. 2732:SMcCandlish 2651:Pieds-noirs 2482:BarrelProof 2442:BarrelProof 2306:helpfully " 2200:Pieds-Noirs 1837:BarrelProof 1686:BarrelProof 1646:BarrelProof 1492:pieds noirs 1379:BarrelProof 1324:BarrelProof 1310:BarrelProof 1264:Han Chinese 1238:BarrelProof 1232:Pieds-noirs 1198:BarrelProof 1183:BarrelProof 1177:(Note also 1047:WP:RACECAPS 1039:most common 1025:Pieds-noirs 1015:move review 804:Peer review 766:Peer review 702:Pieds-noirs 4872:Categories 4607:absolutely 4568:Pieds-noir 4564:Pied-noirs 4482:WP:SOFIXIT 4384:Manicheans 4315:MOS:HYPHEN 4217:Necrothesp 4185:WP:P&G 4165:Melungeons 3911:Blitz Kids 3468:Anypodetos 3414:Warrenᚋᚐᚊᚔ 3328:Shayakraut 3199:There are 2750:À la carte 2575:Riad Salih 2383:Riad Salih 1893:Wiktionary 1552:R Prazeres 1516:R Prazeres 1444:R_Prazeres 1268:Sama-Bajau 1160:Pied-noirs 712:under the 587:Place the 4702:pied-noir 4560:Pied-noir 4376:Coloureds 4360:Corsicans 4331:loan word 4265:WP:NCCAPS 4261:WP:PLURAL 4169:Coloureds 4129:Pied-noir 4121:Melungeon 4024:, yanno. 3766:BADGERING 3645:Snow Rise 3476:Elizium23 3472:GPHemsley 3376:Geoking66 3304:Warrenmck 3169:Pied-noir 3156:Pied-noir 2926:Pied-noir 2922:Pied-noir 2824:voir dire 2724:Blackfoot 2379:indicates 2316:precisely 2308:explained 2303:yesterday 1718:pied noir 1700:Pied-Noir 1664:Pied-Noir 1660:Pied-Noir 1612:Pied-Noir 1580:Pied-Noir 1202:yes, see 1167:Americans 1096:Pied-noir 1091:Pied-Noir 1023:moved to 996:Lowercase 850:Archive 1 597:template 4842:Proposal 4829:Elinruby 4811:France. 4772:Elinruby 4752:Elinruby 4730:Elinruby 4680:Elinruby 4641:Elinruby 4536:Elinruby 4522:Dicklyon 4501:Dicklyon 4486:Dicklyon 4420:Mathglot 4269:MOS:CAPS 4239:Elinruby 4181:MOS:CAPS 4066:Elinruby 4026:Elinruby 4006:M.Bitton 3968:Elinruby 3897:M.Bitton 3883:Elinruby 3869:Elinruby 3752:Elinruby 3677:Elinruby 3662:Elinruby 3649:Mcmisher 3630:Elinruby 3616:0x0077BE 3567:Elinruby 3553:Elinruby 3531:Elinruby 3517:Elinruby 3485:Elinruby 3449:Elinruby 3444:Mahagaja 3381:Elinruby 3349:Elinruby 3340:LingLass 3313:Elinruby 3279:Elinruby 3219:Mathglot 3105:Elinruby 3091:M.Bitton 3077:Elinruby 3061:M.Bitton 3044:Elinruby 3027:M.Bitton 3013:Elinruby 2995:M.Bitton 2978:Elinruby 2904:Dicklyon 2890:M.Bitton 2876:Dicklyon 2861:M.Bitton 2818:Comment. 2804:Dicklyon 2754:M.Bitton 2687:Dicklyon 2673:M.Bitton 2659:Dicklyon 2637:M.Bitton 2620:M.Bitton 2605:Dicklyon 2587:M.Bitton 2579:M.Bitton 2561:Dicklyon 2553:MOS:CAPS 2539:M.Bitton 2515:Dicklyon 2500:M.Bitton 2456:M.Bitton 2420:M.Bitton 2403:Dicklyon 2365:Dicklyon 2350:M.Bitton 2334:Elinruby 2319:entity". 2269:Elinruby 2250:Dicklyon 2176:Elinruby 2141:M.Bitton 2127:Elinruby 2033:Elinruby 1991:Elinruby 1977:Elinruby 1958:M.Bitton 1938:Elinruby 1928:becomes 1822:M.Bitton 1772:Elinruby 1723:Dicklyon 1704:M.Bitton 1668:M.Bitton 1634:Sihasapa 1616:M.Bitton 1584:M.Bitton 1537:M.Bitton 1452:Elinruby 1448:M.Bitton 1431:Elinruby 1394:M.Bitton 1338:M.Bitton 1260:Mandinka 1142:Elinruby 1082:contribs 972:Elinruby 957:Elinruby 928:Elinruby 912:Elinruby 904:africain 896:algérien 888:français 838:Archives 809:Reviewed 771:Reviewed 726:reassess 431:European 41:GA-class 4461:Problem 4433:Support 4400:Ohioans 4213:Neutral 4191:oirs". 4123:), use 3697:editor 3655:, and 3653:Phinumu 3614:, and 3608:Mattghg 3592:Codrinb 3539:Irtapil 3512:Irtapil 3510:, and 3478:, and 3442:, and 3436:Bignole 3397:Waikiki 3374:, and 3342:, and 3306:, and 3217:to it? 3207:Fooians 3151:Support 2856:Comment 2242:Support 1632:or the 1365:". The 1359:Collins 1357:", and 1301:Carioca 1295:Hoosier 900:chinois 749:Process 580:tasks: 552:on the 463:on the 362:on the 335:History 326:History 282:History 257:on the 230:Algeria 220:Algeria 175:Algeria 150:on the 4711:Buistr 4443:(talk) 4416:ngrams 4392:Arians 4356:people 4296:. The 4082:. HAND 3748:please 3699:Warren 3604:Fluous 3480:Ffbond 3440:Rjanag 3432:Ihcoyc 3344:BeKowz 3296:Aamri2 3215:people 3171:people 2480:. —⁠ ⁠ 2288:issue. 1770:group. 1684:? —⁠ ⁠ 1644:. —⁠ ⁠ 1642:Malbec 1426:WP:MOS 1361:says " 1353:says " 1283:beaner 1256:Romani 1236:. —⁠ ⁠ 1165:(like 790:Listed 752:Result 436:Europe 387:Europe 123:France 114:France 70:France 47:scale. 4286:white 4022:title 3401:WP:RS 3364:Nohat 1504:and 1371:Times 1306:terms 1277:hunky 1171:Kurds 1103:(see 1045:(aka 892:russe 884:never 4860:talk 4833:talk 4817:talk 4797:talk 4776:talk 4756:talk 4734:talk 4715:talk 4690:talk 4668:talk 4645:talk 4540:talk 4526:talk 4512:talk 4490:talk 4472:talk 4438:Tony 4424:talk 4343:talk 4319:need 4273:only 4243:talk 4221:talk 4070:talk 4030:talk 4010:talk 3972:talk 3935:talk 3901:talk 3887:talk 3873:talk 3858:talk 3813:talk 3803:per 3756:talk 3705:eBay 3681:talk 3666:talk 3634:talk 3571:talk 3557:talk 3543:talk 3521:talk 3489:talk 3453:talk 3385:talk 3353:talk 3317:talk 3283:talk 3223:talk 3109:talk 3095:talk 3081:talk 3065:talk 3048:talk 3031:talk 3017:talk 2999:talk 2982:talk 2908:talk 2894:talk 2880:talk 2865:talk 2808:talk 2783:talk 2758:talk 2691:talk 2677:talk 2663:talk 2641:talk 2624:talk 2609:talk 2591:talk 2583:talk 2565:talk 2543:talk 2519:talk 2504:talk 2486:talk 2476:and 2470:Noir 2460:talk 2446:talk 2436:But 2424:talk 2407:talk 2399:here 2387:talk 2369:talk 2354:talk 2338:talk 2273:talk 2254:talk 2180:talk 2131:talk 2037:talk 1995:talk 1981:talk 1962:talk 1942:talk 1932:and 1909:name 1897:Aeon 1841:talk 1835:—⁠ ⁠ 1826:talk 1776:talk 1727:talk 1708:talk 1690:talk 1672:talk 1650:talk 1620:talk 1602:talk 1588:talk 1556:talk 1541:talk 1520:talk 1509:this 1456:talk 1435:talk 1398:talk 1383:talk 1342:talk 1328:talk 1314:talk 1298:and 1289:gook 1242:talk 1220:talk 1210:and 1187:talk 1169:and 1146:talk 1129:talk 1115:and 1078:talk 982:talk 961:talk 942:talk 932:see 916:talk 746:Date 640:Iyer 249:High 142:High 4854:). 4584:😼 4418:). 4302:pom 4290:pom 4288:or 4205:😼 4098:ed. 3839:ed. 3784:ed. 3734:ed. 3596:LWG 3464:Men 3428:JWB 3256:ed. 3187:ed. 2941:ed. 2841:ed. 2752:)? 2741:😼 2599:1) 2557:not 2217:ed. 2156:ed. 2109:ed. 2062:ed. 2017:ed. 1973:any 1578:Is 1446:or 1270:or 1119:). 668:or 544:Low 455:Low 354:Low 4874:: 4862:) 4835:) 4819:) 4799:) 4791:. 4778:) 4758:) 4736:) 4717:) 4692:) 4670:) 4647:) 4572:— 4542:) 4528:) 4514:) 4492:) 4484:. 4474:) 4426:) 4410:⟶ 4402:⟶ 4394:⟶ 4386:⟶ 4382:; 4378:⟶ 4374:; 4370:⟶ 4366:; 4362:⟶ 4345:) 4245:) 4223:) 4193:— 4137:if 4095:, 4072:) 4032:) 4012:) 3974:) 3937:) 3917:/ 3903:) 3889:) 3875:) 3860:) 3836:, 3815:) 3781:, 3758:) 3731:, 3721:. 3715:}} 3709:{{ 3695:To 3683:) 3668:) 3651:, 3647:, 3636:) 3610:, 3606:, 3602:, 3598:, 3594:, 3573:) 3559:) 3545:) 3523:) 3506:, 3502:, 3491:) 3474:, 3470:, 3466:, 3455:) 3438:, 3434:, 3430:, 3426:, 3387:) 3370:, 3366:, 3355:) 3338:, 3334:, 3330:, 3319:) 3302:, 3298:, 3285:) 3253:, 3243:. 3225:) 3184:, 3174:. 3111:) 3097:) 3083:) 3067:) 3050:) 3033:) 3019:) 3001:) 2984:) 2938:, 2910:) 2896:) 2882:) 2867:) 2838:, 2810:) 2798:, 2785:) 2777:. 2760:) 2729:— 2693:) 2679:) 2665:) 2643:) 2626:) 2611:) 2593:) 2585:) 2567:) 2545:) 2521:) 2506:) 2498:. 2488:) 2462:) 2448:) 2426:) 2409:) 2389:) 2371:) 2356:) 2340:) 2310:" 2275:) 2256:) 2214:, 2182:) 2153:, 2133:) 2106:, 2059:, 2039:) 2027:o 2014:, 1997:) 1983:) 1964:) 1948:t 1944:) 1891:, 1887:, 1843:) 1828:) 1778:) 1729:) 1710:) 1702:. 1692:) 1674:) 1666:. 1652:) 1622:) 1614:? 1604:) 1590:) 1558:) 1543:) 1522:) 1494:). 1484:") 1471:). 1458:) 1437:) 1400:) 1385:) 1344:) 1330:) 1316:) 1286:, 1280:, 1266:, 1262:, 1258:, 1244:) 1222:) 1206:, 1189:) 1148:) 1131:) 1111:, 1107:, 1099:– 1093:→ 1084:) 1080:• 1007:. 984:) 963:) 944:) 936:. 918:) 902:, 898:, 894:, 890:, 729:it 720:. 672:. 595:}} 589:{{ 4858:( 4831:( 4815:( 4795:( 4774:( 4754:( 4732:( 4713:( 4688:( 4682:: 4678:@ 4666:( 4643:( 4582:¢ 4579:☏ 4538:( 4524:( 4510:( 4503:: 4499:@ 4488:( 4470:( 4422:( 4341:( 4241:( 4219:( 4203:¢ 4200:☏ 4189:N 4177:s 4173:s 4152:s 4148:s 4084:! 4068:( 4028:( 4008:( 3970:( 3941:' 3933:( 3899:( 3885:( 3871:( 3856:( 3811:( 3800:' 3770:! 3754:( 3701:: 3679:( 3664:( 3659:: 3643:@ 3632:( 3627:: 3623:@ 3618:: 3590:@ 3569:( 3555:( 3541:( 3529:@ 3519:( 3514:: 3498:@ 3487:( 3482:: 3462:@ 3451:( 3446:: 3422:@ 3383:( 3378:: 3362:@ 3351:( 3346:: 3326:@ 3315:( 3310:: 3294:@ 3281:( 3221:( 3107:( 3093:( 3079:( 3063:( 3046:( 3029:( 3015:( 2997:( 2980:( 2906:( 2892:( 2878:( 2863:( 2806:( 2781:( 2756:( 2739:¢ 2736:☏ 2720:' 2689:( 2675:( 2661:( 2639:( 2622:( 2607:( 2589:( 2581:( 2563:( 2541:( 2517:( 2502:( 2484:( 2458:( 2444:( 2422:( 2405:( 2385:( 2367:( 2352:( 2336:( 2271:( 2252:( 2178:( 2129:( 2035:( 1993:( 1979:( 1960:( 1940:( 1911:. 1899:. 1874:. 1839:( 1824:( 1774:( 1725:( 1706:( 1688:( 1670:( 1648:( 1618:( 1600:( 1586:( 1554:( 1539:( 1518:( 1454:( 1433:( 1396:( 1381:( 1340:( 1326:( 1312:( 1240:( 1218:( 1200:: 1196:@ 1185:( 1175:? 1173:) 1144:( 1127:( 1076:( 1071:) 1067:( 1027:. 980:( 974:: 970:@ 959:( 940:( 930:: 926:@ 914:( 731:. 556:. 467:. 366:. 261:. 227:. 154:. 53:: 20:)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index