1423:
province, of course, but for the vast majority of the 23 million citizens of Taiwan, this is not how they identify themselves. There is a good proportion of people in Taiwan (though still a minority) who would like to see Taiwan and China unified, but easily less than 0.01% of them would do so under the auspices of the PRC or CCP. Furthermore, the major portion of the Taiwan population would just as well have nothing to do with China if they we given a choice without threat of war or invasion. The fact is that Taiwan is an independently administered state. It is large, stable and economically independent, and has been for 70 years. It has it's own standing military, free-floating currency, legislative government, open democratic elections, and is among the top 20 or so economies in the world. The PRC has never held any jurisdiction over Taiwan, and even the old ROC only held jurisdiction over Taiwan for a couple of years before the ROC government exiled itself to Taiwan in 1949. Moreover, the term "Province" is now an anachronism because the ROC government dissolved the Taiwan "provincial government" entity in the early 1990s. Previous to that time, the ROC legislature on Taiwan had representation of all the provinces of China, but then decided in all practicality to dissolve provincial representation, including that of Taiwan. Obviously Ruslik0 is a proponent of the CCP's perspective of the situation, but he/she should not be allowed to block an edit simply because it runs counter to that perspective. If Ruslik0 is the author of the article, then he/she ought to be allowed to raise a complaint, but must at least accommodate an opposing view such as mine to exist in juxtaposition to his/her in the same article. I believe the wording of the article as it exists is misguided and spreads misinformation, nor does it reflect the central reality of 23 million people. This fact should be clearly noted on such an important platform as wikipedia. In regard to this issue, CCP censors have been waging an information war in western media and education, and unfortunately they have been winning by virtue of threats, financial leverage and sheer numbers. I don't see voices like mine overcoming their bullying approach throughout the world any time soon, but I would believe that at least a platform like wikipedia would not cave to their manipulations. Thank you, Daniel
Brownwood PS what exactly is "Ruslik0"? Why does he/she have the ability to block me and my wiki account? I can't even access my account to change my password.
1688:, a puppet state and later autonomous district created by the Japanese from parts of three Republican Provinces. There was another district that was a new creation by the Japanese authorities (or the Reorganised National Government of the Republic of China as the puppet state was called) - called 蘇北 Sūběi, usually rendered as Supeh in English texts. As the name suggests, I believe it was approximately what is now the northern part of Jiangsu. The Japanese authorities briefly issued postage stamps for the district in 1941, as they did in the other "Six Districts" of Northern China, in order to prevent people taking advantage of currency variations between different occupied districts and between occupied and Nationalist controlled regions. At present there is no article on Supeh on Knowledge. Should there be?
980:"Province" page there is a reason why we have "Province" page and a "Province-level" page. They are not the same thing this is a "encyclopedia" which suppose to sort out. You are also saying that the other Province-level divisions are the same thing as Province. An example, Special Administrative Region (a Province-level division) which enjoy more rights are the same as province which are rule by a Committee Secretary under the central government not a Chief Executive and its own laws. That is what you are saying if you put your list on this "Province" page. You are also generalizing that "they won't know to do a search of things like china municipalities and china autonomous regions." —
1544:
doesn't administer it. I can also help you save a lot of time: You won't find any official ROC sources because mainland China, Outer
Mongolia and all those islands you hear about in the news, where the PRC is in dispute with many other countries are also claimed by the ROC. This is a legal issue. You will get your sources when the ROC declares itself a new state. It doesn't matter what they've been up to the past 70 years. You should have stayed blocked because going on such a long rant about a topic you clearly know nothing about descredits your intent to contribute in an encyclopoedic manner.--
101:
167:
1528:
effect that block was actively lifted. As for the information I was trying to amend, I will try to find primary source material(ROC gov't records or news articles) to use to cite my dispute with the designation of "province". I assume if such source material is available and accessible to wiki readers that then the dispute on terminology will stand in this article. As for "minority" viewpoints, it is true the population ratio between PRC and Taiwan is roughly 40/1, but that does not mean this issue is a random or fringe concern.
31:
91:
64:
304:
220:
199:
325:
414:
230:
22:
1801:
335:
807:. The removal of the traditional Chinese is unwarranted, the provinces themselves predate the use of simplified Chinese, so researchers and those with old maps will certainly find the old glyphs useful. "I want a clean page" is not a valid reason for removal of the characters, and smacks of a violation of
1727:
What does the pale yellow coloring mean for Fujian, Guangdong, and Hainan? At least on the mobile version, I could not find any legend for the table or any other explanation of what the colors mean. I can deduce what the pink and green mean, but I have no idea about that off-white/light-yellow color.
946:
This map is like a superset though, it has all the provinces and autonomous regions when people search for China provinces they just want to see a map of China and how it is seperated, they won't know to do a search of things like china municipalities and china autonomous regions, if you want people
689:
The map showing the provinces of China according to the ROC has a designation for Aksai Chin as territory "claimed by India, administered by PRC". But since this map is based on the ROC's claims, the question should be whether it is claimed by the ROC, with India's claims not being the subject here.
1063:
Perhaps there should be some kind of mention of other regions that may not officially be provinces. For example, there is no mention of Tibet, Xinjiang, Guangxi, Chongqing and the special city districts (Beijing, Shanghai and
Tianjin). None of these are mentioned in the table or text. The image is
616:
Most readers who find this article, myself included, wanted to see a complete map of the internal administrative or political units of China, and may not have been aware that every internal administrative or political unit of China was not translated as such; if someone else doesn't do this, I may
1264:
Provinces (Chinese: 省; pinyin: Shěng), formally province-level administrative divisions (Chinese: 省级行政区; pinyin: Shěng Jí Xíngzhèngqū) are the highest-level
Chinese administrative divisions. There are 34 such divisions, classified as 22 provinces, 4 municipalities, 5 autonomous regions, 2 Special
1024:
The article as it reads simply states that the secretary of the
Communist Party's provincial committee is the leader of each province, as opposed to the governor of the province. This may in fact be demonstrably the case, but it can't simply be declared: it's certainly disputable, and needs to be
612:
Several such maps exist which depict every "territory governed as an administrative or political unit of a country or empire.", instead of showing grayed out zones in the place of provinces (in the
English sense of the word), and which specify which are (Chinese: 省; pinyin: Shěng), and which are
608:
While the image here depicts (Chinese: 省; pinyin: Shěng), a specific
Chinese administrative division which is translated to English as "Province" but contains a specific meaning, the English article concerning "Provinces of China" is extremely deficient if it does not depict "Provinces of China"
1527:
Thank you for your clear and thoughtful response. My account was blocked to editing around midday on Feb 2, and Ruslik0 was listed as the blocking agent. I sent off an appeal in a couple of directions, and it seems the block was lifted later that day, though I received no direct response to the
1543:
You will find no such source. This shows how ill-informed and biased you are. I don't think you understand the point of this article. You can try to find as many ROC sources as you want, it doesn't change how Taiwan is seen in the PRC constitution. It's already mentioned that the PRC currently
1422:
I was blocked from editing on wikipedia by a user named Ruslik0. I think he/she has blocked me for making a correction to an article titled "Provinces of China" in which I made a change to the wording of Taiwan "Province", basically eliminating the title of
Province. The PRC claims Taiwan as a
860:
The page containing both types of characters does not appear to be unnecessarily cluttered, and the traditional characters to add valuable and interesting information, and they do make sense from a historical perspective because many (most?) of the names pre-date the introduction of simplified
979:
page thats where your list should go that the super-set! Also we are not talking only talking about the map also the list. There is a reason why there is a sidebar on the right side that allow people to see there are more that one division under province-level division. Like I said this is a
1207:
1273:
This passage doesn't indicate we are talking about PRC. The
Republic of China on Taiwan also states in its laws that Taiwan is part of China, so does RC claim the whole PRC and more. It must be made clear that PRC and RC claim each other, it's not only the PRC.
433:
947:
to goto your autonomous regions page and specific municipalities page then you should make a link on the provinces page, but i don't think you need to be so detailed to change the map to have "provinces only".. that is being a little anal. -cgy
1707:
I hereby propose to remove the country comparison column. The information given is not useful in any way or form and it is not even accurate (e. g. Hebei 74 - Germany 83). It is just a distraction. If nobody contests, I will remove the
833:
most populous city should be removed as this is typically the same as the capital.. also the
Chinese characters for the province capitals should be re-added. I added them a couple of years ago (w/ pinyin too!) and someone took it out
617:
not add in a copyright or fair-use acceptable images, as I have never before been inspired to attempt to change any images on Knowledge, until I saw this one, which is remarkably deficient in displaying the topic of the article.
1322:
the second compares China today with the Taiwan’s claims overlaid on the same map. It’s important to make the distinction – travel to China today and the provinces, except Taiwan, are provinces of China. Taiwan also
1465:
status as a purported province of the PRC. It should be made clear that this status is basically only a territorial claim and not an administrative reality, but it should be done in a neutral way. Big swaths of
674:). Autonomous regions, provinces and municipalities are listed in the same sentence of Article 30 of the constitution, which governs the administrative divisions of the PRC. SARs are governed by Article 31. —
1656:
659:
The Special Administrative Regions of Hong Kong and Macau are officially considered to be province-level as well, though in reality they have much more autonomy than regular provinces, autonomous regions, or
1683:
I don't know much about this, but it seems that during the Japanese Occupation, Provinces were referred to as Districts in English. Did that reflect a change in Chinese usage? There is already a page for
922:
1878:
1585:
1545:
548:
636:, which has a complete map of first-level administrative divisions in China. I hate this terminology too, but they're the words used by English academic sources on Chinese administration.
506:
176:
74:
1858:
1373:
uses the proper name of the state in regards to its territorial claims, even when not juxtaposed with the PRC, then that is good enough to use the proper names of both states here.
35:
1888:
666:
Nowhere in the PRC's constitution or in the basic laws of the two SARs says SARs are designated province level. They are local administrative regions come directly under the
181:
1655:
Agreed. I think the attempt to combine two separate topics (provinces in the PRC and provinces in the ROC) just makes things confusing. I'm going to move that info onto the
562:
1640:
refer to the PRC as "China", I feel it doesn't make sense to create this overlap between the two. Maybe we can mention Taiwan's position later in the article? Thoughts?
1140:
1863:
1327:
them with slightly different demarcations. But the actual provinces and modern borders are those of China. It does not matter who drew the map (probably a Wikipedian).
671:
1614:
1893:
1883:
1873:
1733:
147:
1848:
499:
492:
463:
437:
609:
according to the standard English meaning of the word "Province", which is "A territory governed as an administrative or political unit of a country or empire."
520:
478:
1461:
When it comes to the use of the designation "Taiwan Province" in this article, we must remember that Taiwan is relevant to this page only in relation to its
1395:: I just noticed the second map makes the same error with respect to Mongolia. Probably better to omit it altogether lest confusion or misinformation arises.
1338:
as it’s a political term hardly used and recognised outside of Taiwan. It has no geographic meaning independent of "Taiwan", so that is all that’s needed.--
1923:
1868:
1853:
381:
773:
who do you think you are? really? wikipedia is for the community, why do you get to be the boss and why is it that all edits must receive your approval?
1908:
1729:
391:
276:
1843:
1362:
Except the simple fact is that the PRC (and the associated further division of Sichuan was not founded until 1949. This is an obvious ambiguity where
286:
753:
Do not abuse my talk page with your misplaced edits, use this article's talkpage. or move on and do something productive. your removal won't stand.
1928:
1918:
1913:
1903:
485:
459:
157:
1309:
I earlier spent some time tidying up the map captions, to make them clearer and remove irrelevant detail from the third. The changes included
720:
cgy01, Knowledge is not space-deficient, and obviously there is some disagreement with your removal. "I want a..." sounds like a violation of
1762:
As explained in the map's caption, Taiwan is claimed (but not administered by) China. It's colored off-yellow to show its disputed status.
1748:
1637:
1345:
701:
357:
1898:
1838:
1563:
1275:
513:
252:
1589:
1549:
1660:
1335:
1242:
896:
Um, it's sort of hard to give a third opinion without seeing any sort of discussion. Can someone explain what's been going on here? —
841:
1507:
1331:
1225:
976:
930:
633:
534:
123:
348:
309:
1636:
Why is the infobox referring to both the People's Republic of China's provinces and Taiwan's claimed provinces? Since sources
918:
803:
I will not even dignify this user with a response, after the racist vomit it left on my talkpage. Instead I have applied for
453:
243:
204:
1384:) as regards to mainland China. Worse, referring to the third map as representing present-day "Taiwanese claims" is simply
1015:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
1622:
667:
555:
444:
426:
44:
1195:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
1092:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
1175:
963:
914:
789:
114:
69:
811:. This is everyone's article, one user's decisions are only one consideration. I submit this for the third opinion.
527:
122:
related articles on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1607:
1533:
1428:
816:
758:
744:
729:
1752:
1645:
1516:
1406:
705:
622:
576:
1802:
provinces and municipalities are no longer legally allowed to unilaterally adopt their own flags, emblems etc.
1380:
citation that the ROC ascribes to the pre-Oct 1949 provincial boundaries (including defunct provinces such as
21:
1603:
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
1567:
1279:
1618:
1229:
166:
1767:
1668:
1246:
845:
641:
1210:
which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —
1790:
1562:
The last reply deserves to be deleted because of its offensive tone and ill-informed and biased content
1105:
1069:
678:
50:
1160:, because this is almost entirely about the PRC, and the current disambiguation regime violates NPOV. —
1529:
1491:
1424:
1389:
1148:
951:
837:
812:
777:
754:
740:
725:
541:
913:
Well the problem is this is a Province page which suppose to only show provinces only. Comparing to
1641:
1340:
1294:
1049:
691:
618:
356:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
251:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1815:
1479:
769:
Kintetsubuffalo, you are not the admin of wikipedia, who are you to say my removal won't stand?
1763:
1713:
1693:
1664:
897:
637:
471:
90:
63:
1786:
1114:
1101:
1065:
1030:
866:
675:
340:
324:
303:
1208:
Template talk:Administrative levels and divisions of the People's Republic of China sidebar
933:
and this page only suppose to represent Provinces not the whole province-level division. —
1363:
1166:
1144:
1002:
994:
959:
785:
235:
1454:
is relevant here with regards to factual issues, and that Knowledge is not a medium for
1455:
1443:
1290:
1045:
569:
413:
229:
219:
198:
1832:
1805:
1599:
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
1475:
1471:
1447:
1211:
808:
721:
1470:
should not make it onto the page, and additions should be done in relation to their
1709:
1689:
1499:
1467:
1451:
1439:
804:
106:
1313:
removing 'map': it’s obvious all three are maps, no need to use it multiple times.
1498:
as of 20:39 UTC 2 Feb, and no, you have no evidence to suggest the administrator
1124:
1026:
981:
934:
862:
700:
It should be added that iı's also claimed by ROC, like "claimed by PRC and ROC".
458:. To help assess the quality and importance of geography articles, please see:
998:
955:
926:
781:
434:
Requested articles/Social sciences/Geography, cities, regions and named places
330:
225:
96:
1241:
That is not what that means. It signifies that there is a footnote attached.
739:
cgy01, this is not a "little" change, and watch your uncivil edit summaries.
1823:
1794:
1771:
1756:
1737:
1717:
1697:
1685:
1672:
1649:
1626:
1593:
1571:
1553:
1537:
1521:
1483:
1432:
1411:
1349:
1298:
1283:
1250:
1233:
1214:
1181:
1152:
1130:
1109:
1073:
1053:
1034:
1006:
987:
967:
940:
929:
insist of using a Province-level list which there is already one located at
907:
870:
849:
820:
793:
762:
748:
733:
709:
694:
645:
626:
353:
1785:
It is good to see that the provinces have their own two-letter codes. ----
1584:
Can anyone provide a source for these? These don't seem to be official. --
724:. This is everyone's article, your aesthetics are only one consideration.
1064:
not loading for me right now so I can't be sure if they are shown there.
248:
1224:
Is it necessary to mark Taiwan as "dead"? The symbol is inappropriate.--
1044:
Fujian province is missing a "22" in the map. Otherwise, fabulous work.
1381:
1330:
The third is just Taiwan’s territories and claims. Not the claims of
1747:
Why is Taiwan on the map of China if Taiwan is not a part of China?
1334:, the current claims. And there’s no need to mention or link to the
1086:
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal.
1189:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal.
119:
15:
1657:
Administrative divisions of the Republic of China (1912–1949)
165:
1468:
unsourced personal analysis on the definition of a province
1392:
clarified that the ROC recognizes the Republic of Mongolia.
995:
http://en.wikipedia.org/Administrative_divisions_of_China
876:
3O on Province only list or Province-level division list
1495:
1370:
1119:
604:
Image must depict all administrative divisions of China
993:
ahh i see now, yes this is the page i was looking for
1879:
Start-Class China-related articles of High-importance
1450:
to back up proposed changes. Remember that no user's
1400:
And lastly, stop using Twinkle in a content dispute.
1359:
I overlooked this, but it does not validate the rest.
1319:
the first map is simple; just a map of China in 1949
1123:– similar to other "Provinces of _____" articles. —
890:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
549:
Geography articles with topics of unclear notability
352:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
247:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
118:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
1289:I agree. I have made some changes to the wording.
1782:Do the provinces of China have their own flags?
1141:Administrative divisions of the Republic of China
1366:calls for usage of "People's Republic of China".
931:Administrative_divisions_of_China#Province_level
925:showing only Special Administrative Region but
1613:Participate in the deletion discussion at the
507:Articles missing geocoordinate data by country
1859:Knowledge level-5 vital articles in Geography
1472:importance and prominence in reliable sources
8:
1120:Provinces of the People's Republic of China
856:3O on Traditional and Simplified Characters
19:
1889:High-importance Chinese provinces articles
1206:There is a move discussion in progress on
613:"autonomous regions" or "municipalities".
421:Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
399:
298:
193:
58:
563:Knowledge requested photographs of places
1679:Districts during the Japanese Occupation
1864:Start-Class vital articles in Geography
1586:2001:16B8:31DE:A700:7172:9BDF:B0FA:FE41
1546:2001:16B8:31DE:A700:7172:9BDF:B0FA:FE41
1418:PRC false claim to Taiwan as a Province
493:Geographic related deletion discussions
300:
195:
60:
1894:WikiProject Chinese provinces articles
1884:Start-Class Chinese provinces articles
1874:High-importance China-related articles
1504:proponent of the the CCP's perspective
1503:
1316:use the common names for the countries
1849:Knowledge vital articles in Geography
1730:Thegoldenconciseencyclopediaofmammals
1703:Pososal to remove country comparisons
1442:interpreted and balanced in light of
464:Unknown-importance geography articles
7:
884:The following discussion is closed.
521:Geography articles needing infoboxes
479:Geography articles needing attention
450:Tag related article talk pages with
346:This article is within the scope of
241:This article is within the scope of
112:This article is within the scope of
1139:, since the ROC's divisions are at
49:It is of interest to the following
1924:High-importance geography articles
1869:Start-Class China-related articles
1854:Start-Class level-5 vital articles
1728:Please add a legend to the table.
1661:Administrative divisions of Taiwan
1580:予、干、沃、䒙 as alternate abbreviations
1336:Free area of the Republic of China
632:The article you're looking for is
14:
1909:High-importance politics articles
977:Administrative divisions of China
921:showing only Municipalities, and
634:Province-level divisions of China
403:WikiProject Geography To-do list:
1844:Knowledge level-5 vital articles
1265:Administrative Regions, and the
1011:The discussion above is closed.
917:showing only Autonomous Region,
438:Missing articles about Locations
412:
333:
323:
302:
228:
218:
197:
99:
89:
62:
29:
20:
386:This article has been rated as
366:Knowledge:WikiProject Geography
281:This article has been rated as
177:the Chinese provinces workgroup
152:This article has been rated as
1929:WikiProject Geography articles
1919:Start-Class geography articles
919:Direct-controlled municipality
652:Special administrative regions
369:Template:WikiProject Geography
261:Knowledge:WikiProject Politics
1:
1914:WikiProject Politics articles
1904:Start-Class politics articles
1698:21:31, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
1650:21:01, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
1452:personal opinions or analysis
1332:Republic of China (1912–1949)
1284:14:06, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
1234:19:02, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
1035:17:01, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
997:okay i agree w/ your changes
923:Special Administrative Region
710:21:04, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
460:Unassessed geography articles
360:and see a list of open tasks.
264:Template:WikiProject Politics
255:and see a list of open tasks.
174:This article is supported by
126:and see a list of open tasks.
1538:00:53, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
1522:20:42, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
1484:15:34, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
1433:07:34, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
1390:ROC Executive Yuan in Taiwan
1251:23:07, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
1074:09:09, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
695:23:12, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
1824:08:06, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
1800:Nope! Actually, since 1997
1795:05:41, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
1412:15:05, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
1350:10:13, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
1215:17:01, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
1202:Move discussion in progress
1054:00:11, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
668:Central People's Government
132:Knowledge:WikiProject China
1945:
1899:WikiProject China articles
1839:Start-Class vital articles
1738:16:33, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
1718:10:37, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
1627:21:55, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
1299:12:15, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
681:19:17, Mar 26, 2005 (UTC)
392:project's importance scale
287:project's importance scale
158:project's importance scale
135:Template:WikiProject China
1816:
1772:21:35, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
1757:21:27, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
1594:22:08, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
1572:18:07, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
1554:22:08, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
1182:13:28, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
1153:10:20, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
1131:01:27, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
1110:19:16, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
1025:backed up by evidence. --
1007:01:01, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
988:05:03, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
968:04:14, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
941:03:41, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
908:03:29, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
850:19:24, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
829:changes needed to be made
763:14:23, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
749:01:28, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
734:15:55, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
646:00:39, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
627:22:50, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
398:
385:
318:
280:
213:
173:
151:
84:
57:
1673:23:02, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
1192:Please do not modify it.
1089:Please do not modify it.
1013:Please do not modify it.
887:Please do not modify it.
871:14:46, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
821:13:12, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
794:02:13, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
535:Knowledge requested maps
500:Geographical coordinates
1020:Leadership of provinces
716:removal of Chinese text
1371:main article at Taiwan
170:
138:China-related articles
454:WikiProject Geography
349:WikiProject Geography
169:
36:level-5 vital article
1494:, no, your user has
1438:Please makes use of
244:WikiProject Politics
813:Chris (クリス • フィッチュ)
755:Chris (クリス • フィッチュ)
741:Chris (クリス • フィッチュ)
726:Chris (クリス • フィッチュ)
656:The article says "
1723:Table needs legend
1619:Community Tech bot
1608:Yuan Provinces.png
372:geography articles
171:
45:content assessment
1519:
1409:
1343:
1165:
971:
954:comment added by
915:Autonomous Region
840:comment added by
797:
780:comment added by
601:
600:
597:
596:
593:
592:
589:
588:
585:
584:
297:
296:
293:
292:
267:politics articles
192:
191:
188:
187:
115:WikiProject China
1936:
1822:
1820:
1814:
1810:
1515:
1513:
1496:not been blocked
1490:For the record,
1440:reliable sources
1405:
1403:
1339:
1269:Taiwan Province.
1194:
1178:
1173:
1169:
1164:
1161:
1127:
1122:
1115:Province (China)
1091:
984:
970:
948:
937:
904:
901:
889:
852:
796:
774:
661:
486:Deletion sorting
457:
427:Article requests
416:
409:
408:
400:
374:
373:
370:
367:
364:
343:
341:Geography portal
338:
337:
336:
327:
320:
319:
314:
306:
299:
269:
268:
265:
262:
259:
238:
233:
232:
222:
215:
214:
209:
201:
194:
140:
139:
136:
133:
130:
109:
104:
103:
102:
93:
86:
85:
80:
77:
66:
59:
42:
33:
32:
25:
24:
16:
1944:
1943:
1939:
1938:
1937:
1935:
1934:
1933:
1829:
1828:
1812:
1806:
1804:
1780:
1745:
1725:
1705:
1681:
1634:
1615:nomination page
1601:
1582:
1530:Neptunechampiom
1511:
1508:not even edited
1492:Neptunechampiom
1425:Neptunechampiom
1420:
1401:
1376:You still have
1348:
1307:
1261:
1222:
1204:
1199:
1190:
1176:
1171:
1167:
1162:
1125:
1118:
1087:
1081:
1061:
1042:
1022:
1017:
1016:
982:
949:
935:
902:
899:
894:
885:
878:
858:
835:
831:
775:
718:
687:
660:municipalities.
658:
654:
606:
581:
577:Geography stubs
451:
388:High-importance
371:
368:
365:
362:
361:
339:
334:
332:
313:High‑importance
312:
283:High-importance
266:
263:
260:
257:
256:
236:Politics portal
234:
227:
208:High‑importance
207:
182:High-importance
154:High-importance
137:
134:
131:
128:
127:
105:
100:
98:
79:High‑importance
78:
72:
43:on Knowledge's
40:
30:
12:
11:
5:
1942:
1940:
1932:
1931:
1926:
1921:
1916:
1911:
1906:
1901:
1896:
1891:
1886:
1881:
1876:
1871:
1866:
1861:
1856:
1851:
1846:
1841:
1831:
1830:
1827:
1826:
1779:
1776:
1775:
1774:
1749:100.16.157.193
1744:
1741:
1724:
1721:
1704:
1701:
1680:
1677:
1676:
1675:
1642:LittleCuteSuit
1638:overwhelmingly
1633:
1630:
1611:
1610:
1600:
1597:
1581:
1578:
1577:
1576:
1575:
1574:
1557:
1556:
1525:
1524:
1517:leave language
1506:, when he has
1487:
1486:
1459:
1419:
1416:
1415:
1414:
1407:leave language
1398:
1397:
1396:
1393:
1374:
1367:
1360:
1353:
1352:
1344:
1341:JohnBlackburne
1328:
1320:
1317:
1314:
1306:
1303:
1302:
1301:
1260:
1257:
1256:
1255:
1254:
1253:
1221:
1218:
1203:
1200:
1198:
1197:
1185:
1184:
1155:
1095:
1094:
1082:
1080:
1079:Requested move
1077:
1060:
1057:
1041:
1038:
1021:
1018:
1010:
991:
990:
944:
943:
893:
892:
880:
879:
877:
874:
857:
854:
830:
827:
826:
825:
824:
823:
771:
770:
767:
766:
765:
717:
714:
713:
712:
702:88.247.101.145
692:Metropolitan90
686:
683:
653:
650:
649:
648:
619:Kaczynskisatva
605:
602:
599:
598:
595:
594:
591:
590:
587:
586:
583:
582:
580:
579:
565:
551:
537:
523:
509:
495:
481:
467:
440:
420:
418:
417:
405:
404:
396:
395:
384:
378:
377:
375:
358:the discussion
345:
344:
328:
316:
315:
307:
295:
294:
291:
290:
279:
273:
272:
270:
253:the discussion
240:
239:
223:
211:
210:
202:
190:
189:
186:
185:
172:
162:
161:
150:
144:
143:
141:
124:the discussion
111:
110:
94:
82:
81:
67:
55:
54:
48:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1941:
1930:
1927:
1925:
1922:
1920:
1917:
1915:
1912:
1910:
1907:
1905:
1902:
1900:
1897:
1895:
1892:
1890:
1887:
1885:
1882:
1880:
1877:
1875:
1872:
1870:
1867:
1865:
1862:
1860:
1857:
1855:
1852:
1850:
1847:
1845:
1842:
1840:
1837:
1836:
1834:
1825:
1821:
1819:
1811:
1809:
1803:
1799:
1798:
1797:
1796:
1792:
1788:
1783:
1777:
1773:
1769:
1765:
1761:
1760:
1759:
1758:
1754:
1750:
1742:
1740:
1739:
1735:
1731:
1722:
1720:
1719:
1715:
1711:
1702:
1700:
1699:
1695:
1691:
1687:
1678:
1674:
1670:
1666:
1662:
1658:
1654:
1653:
1652:
1651:
1647:
1643:
1639:
1631:
1629:
1628:
1624:
1620:
1616:
1609:
1606:
1605:
1604:
1598:
1596:
1595:
1591:
1587:
1579:
1573:
1569:
1565:
1564:83.250.76.132
1561:
1560:
1559:
1558:
1555:
1551:
1547:
1542:
1541:
1540:
1539:
1535:
1531:
1523:
1518:
1509:
1505:
1502:is somehow a
1501:
1497:
1493:
1489:
1488:
1485:
1481:
1477:
1473:
1469:
1464:
1460:
1457:
1453:
1449:
1445:
1441:
1437:
1436:
1435:
1434:
1430:
1426:
1417:
1413:
1408:
1399:
1394:
1391:
1387:
1383:
1379:
1375:
1372:
1368:
1365:
1361:
1358:
1357:
1355:
1354:
1351:
1347:
1342:
1337:
1333:
1329:
1326:
1321:
1318:
1315:
1312:
1311:
1310:
1304:
1300:
1296:
1292:
1288:
1287:
1286:
1285:
1281:
1277:
1276:2.245.192.184
1271:
1270:
1268:
1258:
1252:
1248:
1244:
1240:
1239:
1238:
1237:
1236:
1235:
1231:
1227:
1219:
1217:
1216:
1213:
1209:
1201:
1196:
1193:
1187:
1186:
1183:
1180:
1179:
1170:
1159:
1156:
1154:
1150:
1146:
1142:
1138:
1135:
1134:
1133:
1132:
1129:
1121:
1116:
1112:
1111:
1107:
1103:
1099:
1093:
1090:
1084:
1083:
1078:
1076:
1075:
1071:
1067:
1058:
1056:
1055:
1051:
1047:
1039:
1037:
1036:
1032:
1028:
1019:
1014:
1009:
1008:
1004:
1000:
996:
989:
986:
978:
974:
973:
972:
969:
965:
961:
957:
953:
942:
939:
932:
928:
924:
920:
916:
912:
911:
910:
909:
906:
905:
891:
888:
882:
881:
875:
873:
872:
868:
864:
861:characters.
855:
853:
851:
847:
843:
839:
828:
822:
818:
814:
810:
806:
802:
801:
800:
799:
798:
795:
791:
787:
783:
779:
768:
764:
760:
756:
752:
751:
750:
746:
742:
738:
737:
736:
735:
731:
727:
723:
715:
711:
707:
703:
699:
698:
697:
696:
693:
684:
682:
680:
677:
673:
672:State Council
669:
664:
662:
651:
647:
643:
639:
635:
631:
630:
629:
628:
624:
620:
614:
610:
603:
578:
574:
572:
571:
566:
564:
560:
558:
557:
552:
550:
546:
544:
543:
538:
536:
532:
530:
529:
524:
522:
518:
516:
515:
510:
508:
504:
502:
501:
496:
494:
490:
488:
487:
482:
480:
476:
474:
473:
468:
465:
461:
455:
449:
447:
446:
441:
439:
435:
431:
429:
428:
423:
422:
419:
415:
411:
410:
407:
406:
402:
401:
397:
393:
389:
383:
380:
379:
376:
359:
355:
351:
350:
342:
331:
329:
326:
322:
321:
317:
311:
308:
305:
301:
288:
284:
278:
275:
274:
271:
254:
250:
246:
245:
237:
231:
226:
224:
221:
217:
216:
212:
206:
203:
200:
196:
183:
180:(assessed as
179:
178:
168:
164:
163:
159:
155:
149:
146:
145:
142:
125:
121:
117:
116:
108:
97:
95:
92:
88:
87:
83:
76:
71:
68:
65:
61:
56:
52:
46:
38:
37:
27:
23:
18:
17:
1817:
1807:
1784:
1781:
1764:SilverStar54
1746:
1726:
1706:
1682:
1665:SilverStar54
1635:
1612:
1602:
1583:
1526:
1462:
1421:
1385:
1377:
1324:
1308:
1305:Map captions
1272:
1266:
1263:
1262:
1243:75.156.68.21
1223:
1205:
1191:
1188:
1174:
1157:
1136:
1113:
1097:
1096:
1088:
1085:
1062:
1043:
1023:
1012:
992:
945:
898:
895:
886:
883:
859:
842:99.151.8.160
832:
772:
719:
688:
665:
657:
655:
638:SilverStar54
615:
611:
607:
568:
567:
554:
553:
540:
539:
526:
525:
512:
511:
498:
497:
484:
483:
470:
469:
443:
442:
425:
424:
387:
347:
282:
242:
175:
153:
113:
107:China portal
51:WikiProjects
34:
1787:MountVic127
1510:this page!
1226:77.0.111.59
1102:Vegaswikian
1066:Ninjawailer
1040:image error
950:—Preceding
836:—Preceding
776:—Preceding
41:Start-class
1833:Categories
1168:Roundtable
1145:Rennell435
1098:Page moved
975:We have a
685:Aksai Chin
542:Notability
491:Listed at
1686:Mengkiang
1512:Caradhras
1402:Caradhras
1388:, as the
1386:incorrect
1291:Tooironic
1259:Precision
1059:Omissions
1046:Tooironic
670:(note: ≠
363:Geography
354:geography
310:Geography
75:Provinces
39:is rated
1808:Remsense
1632:Infobox?
1476:Jancarcu
1456:activism
1364:WP:NC-CN
1212:RMCD bot
964:contribs
952:unsigned
838:unsigned
790:contribs
778:unsigned
258:Politics
249:politics
205:Politics
1710:Taliopo
1708:column.
1690:WestNab
1663:pages.
1514:Aiguo (
1500:Ruslik0
1463:de jure
1444:WP:NPOV
1404:Aiguo (
1369:If the
1267:claimed
1158:Support
1137:Support
903:Annyong
514:Infobox
472:Cleanup
390:on the
285:on the
156:on the
1743:Taiwan
1448:WP:DUE
1382:Chahar
1356:Nope.
1325:claims
1177:Record
1126:ASDFGH
1027:Jammoe
983:ASDFGH
936:ASDFGH
863:Readin
809:WP:OWN
722:WP:OWN
679:ntnood
445:Assess
47:scale.
1778:Flags
1346:deeds
1163:HXL's
956:Cgy01
927:Cgy01
900:Hello
805:WP:3O
782:Cgy01
676:Insta
570:Stubs
556:Photo
129:China
120:China
70:China
28:This
1791:talk
1768:talk
1753:talk
1734:talk
1714:talk
1694:talk
1669:talk
1659:and
1646:talk
1623:talk
1590:talk
1568:talk
1550:talk
1534:talk
1480:talk
1446:and
1429:talk
1295:talk
1280:talk
1247:talk
1230:talk
1149:talk
1106:talk
1070:talk
1050:talk
1031:talk
1003:talk
999:Chan
960:talk
867:talk
846:talk
817:talk
786:talk
759:talk
745:talk
730:talk
706:talk
642:talk
623:talk
575:See
561:See
547:See
533:See
519:See
505:See
477:See
462:and
436:and
432:See
382:High
277:High
148:High
1617:. —
1172:and
1128:=]
985:=]
938:=]
663:".
528:Map
1835::
1813:‥
1793:)
1770:)
1755:)
1736:)
1716:)
1696:)
1671:)
1648:)
1625:)
1592:)
1570:)
1552:)
1536:)
1520:)
1482:)
1431:)
1410:)
1378:no
1297:)
1282:)
1274:--
1249:)
1232:)
1151:)
1143:.
1117:→
1108:)
1100:.
1072:)
1052:)
1033:)
1005:)
966:)
962:•
869:)
848:)
819:)
792:)
788:•
761:)
747:)
732:)
708:)
690:--
644:)
625:)
456:}}
452:{{
184:).
73::
1818:论
1789:(
1766:(
1751:(
1732:(
1712:(
1692:(
1667:(
1644:(
1621:(
1588:(
1566:(
1548:(
1532:(
1478:(
1474:.
1458:.
1427:(
1293:(
1278:(
1245:(
1228:(
1220:†
1147:(
1104:(
1068:(
1048:(
1029:(
1001:(
958:(
865:(
844:(
815:(
784:(
757:(
743:(
728:(
704:(
640:(
621:(
573::
559::
545::
531::
517::
503::
489::
475::
466:.
448::
430::
394:.
289:.
160:.
53::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
