246:
in making the section flabbier. Only one of the points listed there has anything like the quality of a definition; the rest are at best a wish-list. The term "public service broadcasting" used in the intro also adds confusion. The intro says that the term means something different in the UK, but much of the rest of the article takes the UK as the defining example so it's hard to take it seriously. (From this perspective it's not clear what sort of distinction, if any, is being drawn; all broadcasters in
31:
184:, cleaned it up and expanded it and moved it to that article. I also fixed the link to IBA in the list of public broadcasters. This article isn't really the place for details on every public broadcaster (other than the list), unless the details are illustative of some point about public broadcasting in general (e.g. not just that public broadcasting _exists_ in this or that country as that purpose is satisfied by the list at the end).
258:
erroneously suggests that advertising is a recent thing; in fact, not having advertising on radio is the recent development (for values of recent including now 30 years of history)—TV always had advertising, and radio historically did. All in all, the section should be, if not "taken out and shot",
200:
To justify this claim, note how the first (introductory and descriptive) paragraph of the commercial broadcasting article already points out a perceived disadvantage, while the "Advantages and
Disadvantages" section of this article mentions only one disadvantages and proceeds to basically dismiss it
245:
Actually, I'd go so far as to call it horrible. Presumably the "Broadcasting
Research Unit" is some British organization (the article doesn't say and it's a red link), since all the original examples came from there. More recent edits have added more international examples but have succeeded only
171:
Under "Advantages and
Disadvantages" you list certain "cultural biases" of commercial broadcasting including the item: "law presented as if it were truth." This statement appears vague and misleading. Do you mean to say "interpretations or opinions of law presented as if they were truth"?
196:
This article has a very clear leftist bias. That is, a bias in favour of public broadcasting. This is obvious especially when compared with the commercial broadcasting article (which also has a leftist bias). It would be nice to see it fixed without having to declare a NPOV dispute.
268:
Actually technically it's the other way around about radio advertising. The first time ads were aired it was considered a daring step. What is more recent is the set-aside for a dedicated public spectrum, but public, noncommercial radio is in fact the original form.
208:
I can't agree either - I don't see a bias in favor, and I agree that even a favorable bias would not be leftist. It probably depends on the country, in fact, as to how public broadcasting is perceived politically, if at all.
345:
125:
I think the article needs a section talking about how public tv runs programs that imposes certain opinions on children. I am not informed enogh to write this article
407:
403:
389:
375:
204:
I can't agree, that is it's not clear to me. And whether a bias in favour of public broadcasting is present here or not, how would that be "leftist"?
315:
226:
346:
https://web.archive.org/web/20131019083435/http://www.b92.net/eng/news/society-article.php?yyyy=2012&mm=06&dd=25&nav_id=80948
276:
83:
141:
99:
79:
225:
By leftist he means, it is in favor of public broadcasting because it is operated by the government instead of private entities... --
385:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
255:
349:
355:
150:
Hmmm, I think not. Sounds like a recipe for an article full of poorly sourced or unsourced, hugely generalising and subjective
181:
450:
376:
https://web.archive.org/web/20080809231748/http://www.brightcove.tv/title.jsp?title=1564577192&channel=301939273
325:
251:
38:
406:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
47:
17:
365:
316:
https://web.archive.org/web/20091009131525/http://www.circom-regional.org/crdocs/european-benchmarking2002.pdf
230:
280:
441:
379:
307:
103:
303:
137:
425:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
413:
335:
306:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
133:
319:
272:
129:
299:
210:
410:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
426:
350:
http://www.b92.net/eng/news/society-article.php?yyyy=2012&mm=06&dd=25&nav_id=80948
214:
356:
https://web.archive.org/web/20090915203134/http://www.radiomec.com.br/radiospublicas/mapa.asp
154:
rants, resulting in edit wars of the type we see in the beloved "criticsms of ..." sections.
455:
433:
284:
263:
234:
218:
160:
107:
157:
98:
are or is it commercial as I see the corporate name being "MediaCorp
Private Limited?" --
392:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
151:
432:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
359:
260:
247:
326:
http://wayback.vefsafn.is/wayback/20060522223149/www.ruv.is/heim/english/english/
254:, to "serve the public interest, convenience, or necessity".) The bit about the
399:
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
398:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
185:
75:
366:
https://web.archive.org/web/20051102001713/http://www.transom.org/index.php
329:
380:
http://www.brightcove.tv/title.jsp?title=1564577192&channel=301939273
336:
https://web.archive.org/web/20140529103918/http://mtva.hu/en/english
369:
320:
http://www.circom-regional.org/crdocs/european-benchmarking2002.pdf
95:
91:
87:
25:
339:
310:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
117:
I'm sure I've seen commercials (not promos) on NHK..
86:. Is MediaCorp a public broadcaster in the sense as
402:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
360:http://www.radiomec.com.br/radiospublicas/mapa.asp
241:"Defining Public Broadcasting" section very weak
172:--xerxes_sator@yahoo.com 26 May 2005 23:04 GMT
388:This message was posted before February 2018.
167:Advantages and Disadvantages: Confusing Phrase
8:
298:I have just modified 7 external links on
330:http://www.ruv.is/heim/english/english/
44:Do not edit the contents of this page.
82:) was privatised by turning into the
7:
84:Television Corporation of Singapore
250:are licensed, in the words of the
80:Singapore Broadcasting Corporation
24:
302:. Please take a moment to review
370:http://www.transom.org/index.php
29:
259:at least shrunk by about 75%.
285:04:00, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
1:
182:Israel Broadcasting Authority
161:18:48, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
456:22:46, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
471:
419:(last update: 5 June 2024)
295:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
252:Communications Act of 1934
235:14:20, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
144:) 16:56, 17 December 2006
108:12:39, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
340:http://mtva.hu/en/english
264:16:28, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
219:23:42, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
188:12:49, 16 Nov 2004 (UTC)
18:Talk:Public broadcasting
291:External links modified
180:I removed the info on
42:of past discussions.
400:regular verification
113:NHK commercial-free?
390:After February 2018
300:Public broadcasting
444:InternetArchiveBot
395:InternetArchiveBot
201:in one paragraph.
420:
287:
275:comment added by
146:
132:comment added by
74:I read somewhere
67:
66:
54:
53:
48:current talk page
462:
454:
445:
418:
417:
396:
270:
145:
126:
63:
56:
55:
33:
32:
26:
470:
469:
465:
464:
463:
461:
460:
459:
448:
443:
411:
404:have permission
394:
308:this simple FaQ
293:
243:
194:
178:
169:
127:
123:
115:
72:
59:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
468:
466:
438:
437:
430:
383:
382:
374:Added archive
372:
364:Added archive
362:
354:Added archive
352:
344:Added archive
342:
334:Added archive
332:
324:Added archive
322:
314:Added archive
292:
289:
242:
239:
238:
237:
227:188.195.145.22
222:
221:
193:
190:
177:
174:
168:
165:
164:
163:
155:
122:
119:
114:
111:
78:in 1994 (then
71:
68:
65:
64:
52:
51:
34:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
467:
458:
457:
452:
447:
446:
435:
431:
428:
424:
423:
422:
415:
409:
405:
401:
397:
391:
386:
381:
377:
373:
371:
367:
363:
361:
357:
353:
351:
347:
343:
341:
337:
333:
331:
327:
323:
321:
317:
313:
312:
311:
309:
305:
301:
296:
290:
288:
286:
282:
278:
277:75.143.206.54
274:
266:
265:
262:
257:
253:
249:
240:
236:
232:
228:
224:
223:
220:
216:
212:
207:
206:
205:
202:
198:
191:
189:
187:
183:
175:
173:
166:
162:
159:
156:
153:
149:
148:
147:
143:
139:
135:
134:74.38.99.188
131:
120:
118:
112:
110:
109:
105:
101:
97:
93:
89:
85:
81:
77:
69:
62:
58:
57:
49:
45:
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
442:
439:
414:source check
393:
387:
384:
297:
294:
267:
248:this country
244:
203:
199:
195:
192:Leftist Bias
179:
170:
124:
116:
100:58.69.182.85
73:
60:
43:
37:
271:—Preceding
128:—Preceding
36:This is an
451:Report bug
158:Pit-yacker
121:Propaganda
434:this tool
427:this tool
76:MediaCorp
70:MediaCorp
61:Archive 1
440:Cheers.—
273:unsigned
261:121a0012
176:Untitled
142:contribs
130:unsigned
304:my edit
211:Lucylu6
39:archive
186:Blorg
16:<
281:talk
231:talk
215:talk
138:talk
104:talk
94:and
408:RfC
378:to
368:to
358:to
348:to
338:to
328:to
318:to
256:CBC
152:POV
96:ZDF
92:TVE
88:RAI
421:.
416:}}
412:{{
283:)
233:)
217:)
140:•
106:)
90:,
453:)
449:(
436:.
429:.
279:(
229:(
213:(
136:(
102:(
50:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.