977:, come back to our discussion. You are little deviating from the real topic to a general discussion about re-recording and film score. We have something specific here to discuss. You haven't replied to my query, this discussion should be actually over by now. The dispute is, you said a keyboard programmer is credited in the end. I believe he is part of music "programming" process. Right ? Now, my question is, is programming a part of "re-recording" process or is it another process ? Because, the director said Sunder solely done "re-recording" not "programming". Please give a direct answer.
691:
593:
514:
280:
1657:
147:
1373:
value of this information? Will we care 10 years from now? Doubtful. Now if the film had spawned some sort of major event--rioting, demonstrations, a women's rights movement--that might be worth mentioning. But misogynistic internet trolling? Same with the cat thing also mentioned above. Knowledge is not a historical archive for every event tangentially related to the subject. We only care about the most important events.
1270:
Indian media, for giving undue weight for a nobody's criticism on the film, who might have done that for cheap publicity. Are you the person who wrote it ? I seriously doubt that. Anyway, Knowledge does not care a random person's opinion. I doubt even outside Wiki anyone even care that. A lots of people comment about a subject through their social networking accounts, Knowledge is not the place for dumping that stuff. --
1460:, blindly reporting figures without independent verification, and republishing claims made by primary sources. Sometimes poor journalism obscures the source of the data. For example, a newspaper may publish a really high first day figure that is also being touted by the producer, but the newspaper may have forgotten (intentionally or otherwise) to mention that the source of the data is the producer.
77:
53:
1611:
646:
549:
468:
202:
175:
87:
22:
212:
1456:
accurate. In Indian cinema articles, we typically get our financial figures from reliable published mainstream sources, (newspapers and reputable entertainment magazines) but ultimately they are all estimates, and thus, should all be taken with a grain of salt, as a number of factors can contribute to inaccuracies. Some of these factors include
1196:
villagers use the term to denote man-eating tigers. And the entire premise of the movie is based on
Mohanlal fighting man eating tigers, with leopards nowhere to be found. So while in a purely literal sense it would be okay to say that Puli-Murugan is Leopard-Murugan, in actual fact the proper translation would be Tiger-Murugan.
1143:
This is to inform all editors who are planning to or already done changing the
English translation of the title Pulimurugan from "Leopard-Murugan" to "Tiger-Murugan". The title "Pulimurugan" is the combination of two words - Puli and Murugan, the former is an animal and the latter is a person's name.
1372:
To the OP, I removed the content because it was incoherent, but also because there was no clear reason why an encyclopedia should care. A random person expressed her opinion and was met with trolling from disrespectful internet users. That could describe any response to any film. What is the 10-year
861:
I am not familiar with these technical processes. The director said, Sunder "re-recorded" the tracks solely, not "programmed". But I don't know if programming and re-recording are the same or "re-recording involves programming", in that case you will be right. You said Sunder is not involved in ADR,
407:
suggest that it was noteworthy there, is that it's alleged to have been the first use of that camera in India. Even then, so what? What's revolutionary about the camera used in
Thuppakki, that we need to know that it was the first usage? If it was the first IMAX film produced in India, that might be
402:
are you referring to as basis for the inclusion of the camera in the lead? I don't see anything in the guideline that would necessitate inclusion of a camera type, especially without any context. Your example of
Thuppakki is not a great one, since there is very little context to explain why we would
1195:
While
Varayan Puli would be Striped Leopard for most people, in the movie it is a reference to the tiger. For people who have seen the movie, the character played by Nobi has the same doubt, and he is told off by the tea shop owner played by Sasi Kalinga and the police man played by Nandhu that the
1087:
I watched the interview. Sounds like the director is misusing the word "re-recording" for film score. So what he actually intended to say was, Sunder "solely" done all the work for film score, which is not, as you said you saw a credit for an additional programming assistant. I think the picture is
876:
Since I don't have any information to answer your questions and I'm mostly just here in a moderator capacity, one question I have is if the statement could also just be hyperbole? I mean maybe the guy is just super-exaggerating Sunder's participation. It's not like that would be out of the question
779:
Thank you for the translation. This isn't original research, since a film's credits can absolutely be used as a reference. If someone said "John Doe was the only writer on the film" but the film credited two other writers, it would be reasonable to include the names of everybody and to discount the
764:
to facilitate the claim by
PlutoniumBackToTheFuture, in case it was true. To non-Malayali readers, in the source, cited content is in the 2nd and 3rd paras from last. It translates as, "Gopi Sunder surprised me during re-recording....no music director in the world would have done re-recording like
1336:
What is your real interest.? Seems like you are struggling hard to defame this film. If you have any aversion, Knowledge is not the stage for it. You want to add a kid injured while imitating a scene, a child maiming a cat. seriously ?. Is this all you got ?. That's what children do, they imitate
1119:
Just so I get this correct, my interpretation is: You are both are in agreement that the content should be excluded as it is unclear and/or dubious what the quoted person is saying. Correct? If so, thanks for the polite discussion. I'll unprotect the article. I hope you both remember to come here
736:
explains the removal with the justification "The director's claim of Sunder soley programming the bg score is contradicted in the film's end credits. An additional keyboard programmer has been credited." That doesn't seem consistent with the statement since keyboard programming and audio mix are
432:
I don't think there is a need to include the bit about camera because it's nothing extraordinary. It's just a camera used by filmmakers to produce films. It's not like when
Tarantino used the 70mm film for his last, now is it? However, AFTER the film releases and IF the film receives a nod or an
1269:
Is this a joke ?. Who is that reviewer ? is she a professional critic ? a notable public figure ?. The critical reception section of the film is for adding professional critics reviews. It is not for adding opinions of a "nobody", a random person, who posted a review in their
Facebook wall. RIP
1455:
I'm not clear on what you'd consider "authentic proof", but to answer your question, there is no central independent auditing performed in Indian cinema. Western markets are lucky to have BoxOfficeMojo.com, which presents a centralized list of figures that are generally considered reliable and
673:
In last paragraph of casting it is stated that
Makarand Deshpande was confirmed to play the antagonist in the film" but in the film he is secondary antagonist. The main antagonist in the film is Jagapati Babu, so please change it to "secondary antagonist or one of the antagonist in the film."
433:
award for DOP or special effects or anything related to the camera, then we can probably think about adding it. Otherwise, it's just padding, as described above. I think you have convinced me (and other readers) about the stuntman, but I definitely think the sentence needs paraphrasing. Best,
354:
Seems like padding to me. Is there anything revolutionary or noteworthy about this camera? Like, are we talking about IMAX or
Cinemascope here? Or is it just a regular camera? I don't think that stunt choreography really belongs in the lead either. Nothing about either topic is found at
780:
odd statement or to explain the discrepancy. What seems more likely in this case, is that Plutonium misunderstood what was being claimed, and couldn't verify his understanding of the claim. Unless I'm missing something it seems like an honest mistake, but I want
1586:
There is no trust full source about Pulimurugan cross 150 cores at box office. Still this page shows wrong information I eaven talk with products company from their part also they said it is just 100 crore business Then why people exaggerated it
1475:
1152:. The Malayalam word for Tiger is "Kaduva". Another twist is that the film deals with tigers not leopards, but there is also an alternate name for Kaduva in Malayalam - "Varayan Puli" (Striped Leopard) and the film uses this name.
1341:
is a popular film and they knows how to sell it to boost their page views. If you want to add anything, the content needs notability, and it is only one among the other requirements. Unless you have something really notable, say
765:
this. Only Gopi's fingers touched (sic) re-recording. Usually it's done by assistants. Worked on each of the tracks with patience. It was a "one-man re-recording". It would be the first incident in the world", said by director.
1027:
are not the same, though they are wrongly treated as synonyms here, including in the source (text interview) you have provided. I have provided a video interview in which the director does the same and talks about programmers.
1040:
alone as the director has tried to convey. The film's end credits contain the name of a second keyboard programmer. I hope I've cleared your doubt. Else please read this discussion from the beginning. Thanks for responding.
1415:
If available, the link can be cited in the reference section. As we can't rely on primary sources (like directors, actors, producers, etc) for box office figures, authentic proof reference is required to support this fact.
377:
Notable people can be identified in the lead. He is the highest paid stunt choreographer in India and it is an action film. And his mention is in the second para about the production. For inclusion of the camera, see
1542:
There is no irony here. I was not aware of the guidelines on the sources which is accepted by Knowledge community for movies. Admin "Cyphoidbomb" has provided me a reference to the guidelines on acceptable sources
1015:
who are usually involved in 're-recording', and how Sunder alone worked on the keyboard for 35 days to complete the 're-recording' of the movie. The entire point of the discussion is to make two things clear.
1182:
978:
1219:
1153:
1089:
863:
766:
1214:
Yes, but the purpose of English translation is to translate the title, what the foreign word(s) mean in English. What it meant in the film can be said in another note in the article or as a
1731:
835:
it, all alone. But the end titles scroll of the film contradicts this statement, as a second keyboard programmer (apart from Sunder) has been credited. So, I've made no mistake here.
813:
by some Indian film technicians. This intentional mistake has eventually become a habit in conversations between technicians. The audience sadly misunderstand this. They think, that
825:
as it is referred to in Indian cinema). But the issue here is different. Let me make it clear that there is no misunderstanding. The director says that his commissioned composer
862:
Foley or Re-recording mixing. Does "premixing" a part of any of these process ?. Then Sunder was involved in it, as there is a video where he is seen premixing in the studio.
1474:
included in box office gross, and in some cases they were just parroting the claims made by the producers. Anyhow, unless you have a persuasive case for why we should ignore
289:
185:
156:
63:
1721:
737:
unrelated processes. So my feeling is, if this was a misinterpretation, the content should be restored. I don't speak any Indic languages, so I'm useless in translating
1470:
600 crore, when it was very obvious that reputable sources like Financial Express/Indian Express were silently lumping in 200 crore in pre-release income, which is
1157:
898:, at 30:40 he starts his hyperbole about Sunder. He uses the term 're-recording' while mentioning how Sunder composed the score, piece by piece, without delegating
867:
770:
1726:
294:
1457:
1308:
What does that even mean ?. And DO NOT add anything to or edit the comment of another user. I have moved it above your comment. Are you both the same person ?.--
495:
The title song - Manathe Marikurumbe - song which is actually written by Sri. Murkan Kattakkada. But it is represented/mistake in the site as Rafeekh Ahammed.
760:
by an editor. If the editor have "any kind of" evidence or a materiel to support the claim, content can be removed or altered based on that. In fact, it was
1736:
847:
involved in ADR, Foley or Re-recording mixing. Every member of the sound department has received credits in the film. Thank you for seeking clarification!
1701:
904:
duties to assistants. He also makes another ridiculous claim that it is possibly the first time in the world! It is acceptable, if he never knew about
948:
even in interviews. They simply refer to the real 're-recording' as 'final mix'. But there is real professionalism shown in some films in which the
1696:
894:, frankly speaking, most of his post-release statements about technicians, especially Sunder did seem so. Blatant statements without research. In
319:
Both, about the camera and fight DOP, have been discussed in the body. Also, neither are relatively significant to be included in the lead, per
1716:
1664:
408:
noteworthy, because IMAX is an expensive, revolutionary format. If the film was produced on an iPhone 5, that might be noteworthy as it was in
270:
260:
738:
1323:
1295:
577:
1286:
1741:
1638:
1505:
1254:
675:
316:
Dear editors, I think there are few sentences in the lead section which I do not think should be included. Consider the revision here -
601:
If you want to suggest a change, please request this in the form "Please replace XXX with YYY" or "Please add ZZZ between PPP and QQQ".
1706:
1186:
1046:
982:
965:
852:
1223:
1093:
1711:
1672:
105:
1691:
1566:
1437:
384:. The camera used in this film is an upgraded version of it. More over, it's part of production which is per WP:FILMLEAD.--
117:
109:
33:
728:
I'm curious if you might be misinterpreting what was being stated in the article. The article says that Sunder did the
235:
225:
180:
1551:
that you have mentioned. Going forward, I will refer the guidelines section for any box office related information.
1357:
1313:
1275:
1247:
of a potential review and the violence propagated against her is an important history with the film and its impact.
1668:
1592:
1042:
974:
961:
848:
781:
725:
113:
100:
58:
1544:
960:
driven pop-corn entertainers. Nothing personal against the director. Just against disproportionate exaggeration!
814:
806:
729:
741:. But if anyone thinks that would help, sometimes these things are a matter of misinterpretation on both sides.
363:
to get more input. This may surprise some editors, but Indian films fall under the scope of WikiProject Film...
389:
1393:
The total gross is wrongly quoted as 1000 crore in the release section. Would be nice if someone corrected it
1327:
1299:
1144:
Pulimurugan is the film's leading character Murugan's alternate name/nickname. Puli is the Malayalam word for
581:
1642:
1509:
1398:
1258:
679:
1617:
1504:
in another film article for updating its gross using a direct source from its producer's facebook page. : )
652:
555:
474:
1588:
1322:
Does anyone have the news article that reported boy caught maiming a cat replicating scenes from the film.
1353:
1337:
films and sometimes gets injured. These are common, manoramaonline.com reported such an incident because
1309:
1271:
999:. The answer for you, again - NO. Programming isn't a part of re-recording. The director is referring to
991:
I am not deviating from the topic. In fact, I suggest you to get back to my previous post about the term
1523:
1483:
1394:
1378:
1348:
1343:
1172:
1129:
882:
789:
746:
706:
607:
to back up your request, without which no information should be added to, or changed in, any article. -
524:
to back up your request, without which no information should be added to, or changed in, any article. -
502:
417:
368:
39:
1218:
beside the title. "Puli" is leopard, if we write tiger instead, it will be an incorrect translation. --
1287:
http://english.manoramaonline.com/news/kerala/pulimurugan-imitation-goes-wrong-class-4-girl-blind.html
498:
279:
1663:
requests for decreases to the page protection level should be directed to the protecting admin or to
1554:
1425:
1250:
698:
626:
442:
340:
21:
1419:
If there is no authentic reference available, box office figures should be removed from wiki page.
900:
831:
385:
360:
328:
697:
We shouldn't be using interpretive labels like protagonist, antagonist, secondary antagonist. See
1562:
1433:
1197:
399:
320:
1422:
2) Is there any independent body (unbiased) that publish the box office collection for films ?
940:
had done so when they were given favorable scoring time. It is sad that some directors refer to
612:
529:
1519:
1479:
1374:
1168:
1125:
941:
925:
891:
878:
822:
798:
785:
742:
702:
413:
409:
364:
324:
937:
929:
622:
435:
333:
323:. It can be discussed to be included AFTER the film releases and if applicable. Thoughts?
956:
engineer'. But that culture is yet to catch up with directors who predominantly focus on
146:
1412:
1) Is there any authentic proof for the total box office collection of Pulimurugan ?
1167:
So what you're saying is that you think the translation should be Leopard, not Tiger?
1685:
1558:
1462:
1450:
1429:
1294:
Notability dominates contents. Beware of angry mastodons and single purpose accounts.
1215:
1121:
1024:
1004:
992:
953:
949:
945:
921:
917:
909:
757:
608:
604:
525:
521:
217:
104:. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can
957:
877:
in the film business. People kiss their bosses asses all the time. Just sayin'.
836:
826:
92:
1466:
is an example of a film that was getting really high box office figures--like
1037:
1020:
1008:
1000:
996:
895:
818:
810:
802:
621:
You can suggest it here. We will be glad to copy paste it to namespace. Best,
207:
82:
76:
52:
933:
380:
912:(1982). But he should have known about a few composers having done that in
201:
174:
784:
to participate before restoring the content and unprotecting the article.
1498:
we can't rely on primary sources (like directors, actors, producers, etc)
905:
840:
356:
121:
1145:
756:
I could not see any reason to remove that sourced content based on an
233:-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the
1676:
1667:
if the protecting admin is not active or has declined the request.
1646:
1596:
1570:
1527:
1513:
1487:
1441:
1402:
1382:
1361:
1331:
1317:
1303:
1279:
1262:
1227:
1209:
1190:
1176:
1161:
1133:
1097:
1050:
986:
969:
886:
871:
856:
793:
774:
750:
721:
To facilitate discussion and to prevent needless edit warring, re:
710:
683:
630:
616:
585:
533:
506:
450:
421:
393:
372:
348:
1149:
913:
230:
1011:, from 30:40, where the director says the same. He talks about
843:
of the movie, i.e, for the score and song compositions. He was
1605:
640:
543:
462:
15:
809:
is informally (an intentional mistake) used as a synonym to
278:
145:
1478:'s estimates, the content should remain. Hope that helps.
1548:
1501:
1244:
761:
733:
722:
576:
For filling Plot - if possible unprotect that section.
317:
1496:
Comment: An irony is, this user Tousifmt who said "
1285:Promotion of thematic violence and other outcomes:
1732:C-Class Indian cinema articles of Mid-importance
1547:for box office collection in the semi-protected
229:, which aims to improve Knowledge's coverage of
120:. To improve this article, please refer to the
637:Semi-protected edit request on 8 November 2016
540:Semi-protected edit request on 7 November 2016
459:Semi-protected edit request on 28 October 2016
1602:Semi-protected edit request on 6 October 2022
801:, firstly, what they are referring to is the
8:
1408:Total Box office collection for Pulimurugan
1148:, there is a common confusion that Puli is
1552:
1423:
1248:
920:had done so in the early '90s. Apparently
169:
116:. To use this banner, please refer to the
47:
1722:C-Class India articles of Low-importance
952:mixer is appropriately credited as the '
359:. I'd recommend opening a discussion at
732:i.e. the mixdown of the film, but your
171:
49:
19:
1665:Knowledge:Requests for page protection
1183:2405:204:D086:79CC:A107:7612:F084:F98B
1120:next time after the first revert, per
979:2405:204:D086:79CC:A107:7612:F084:F98B
1727:Mid-importance Indian cinema articles
1220:2405:204:D184:36A5:A43D:2420:AE40:2FE
1154:2405:204:D008:1DC6:4C5:A34F:BE0A:18AE
1090:2405:204:D187:EAC:F1E7:990B:EFC6:3CD6
864:2405:204:D008:1DC6:4C5:A34F:BE0A:18AE
767:2405:204:D008:1DC6:4C5:A34F:BE0A:18AE
7:
1352:, you are not welcomed to add it. --
223:This article is within the scope of
98:This article is within the scope of
1651:Please allow us to edit this page.
995:being wrongly used as a synonym to
599:as you have not requested a change.
38:It is of interest to the following
1737:WikiProject Indian cinema articles
14:
1702:Indian cinema task force articles
154:This article is supported by the
1655:
1609:
689:
644:
591:
547:
512:
466:
210:
200:
173:
114:regional and topical task forces
85:
75:
51:
20:
265:This article has been rated as
1697:C-Class Indian cinema articles
1344:the Colorado shooting incident
1:
1717:Low-importance India articles
1383:15:29, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
1362:12:12, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
1332:02:19, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
1318:12:12, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
1304:02:14, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
1280:16:50, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
1263:09:39, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
1177:20:39, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
1162:19:10, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
970:23:59, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
887:20:49, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
872:19:47, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
857:19:09, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
794:18:04, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
775:17:15, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
751:16:34, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
287:This article is supported by
1228:19:55, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
1210:07:18, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
1191:14:24, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
1134:22:16, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
1098:21:08, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
1051:17:28, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
987:14:22, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
829:composed the film score and
711:06:29, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
684:03:32, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
631:16:52, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
617:08:56, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
586:08:50, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
534:11:26, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
507:07:32, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
1677:09:25, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
1647:07:58, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
1632:to reactivate your request.
1620:has been answered. Set the
1597:05:48, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
1582:About box office collection
667:to reactivate your request.
655:has been answered. Set the
570:to reactivate your request.
558:has been answered. Set the
489:to reactivate your request.
477:has been answered. Set the
290:the Indian cinema workgroup
245:Knowledge:WikiProject India
1758:
1742:WikiProject India articles
1571:11:18, 29 April 2017 (UTC)
1528:14:05, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
1514:08:16, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
1488:19:27, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
1442:14:02, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
403:care. The only thing that
271:project's importance scale
248:Template:WikiProject India
130:Knowledge:WikiProject Film
1707:WikiProject Film articles
1403:15:31, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
1007:. You can also check the
717:Dispute over re-recording
451:06:39, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
422:04:39, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
394:19:36, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
373:16:37, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
349:16:01, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
286:
264:
195:
153:
133:Template:WikiProject Film
70:
46:
1500:" made a semi-protected
1043:PlutoniumBackToTheFuture
975:PlutoniumBackToTheFuture
962:PlutoniumBackToTheFuture
849:PlutoniumBackToTheFuture
839:was commissioned as the
782:PlutoniumBackToTheFuture
726:PlutoniumBackToTheFuture
412:, because it's unusual.
157:Indian cinema task force
817:is the real synonym to
1712:C-Class India articles
1458:straight-up corruption
1240:Violence against women
1181:Not "I think". It is.
520:as you have not cited
283:
150:
28:This article is rated
1692:C-Class film articles
1669:ScottishFinnishRadish
1349:The Dark Knight Rises
282:
149:
1009:this video interview
908:having done that in
896:this video interview
739:the relevant source
106:join the discussion
1518:Lol. Of course...
734:original reversion
284:
151:
34:content assessment
1636:
1635:
1573:
1557:comment added by
1444:
1428:comment added by
1265:
1253:comment added by
928:, composers like
671:
670:
603:Please also cite
574:
573:
493:
492:
309:
308:
305:
304:
301:
300:
226:WikiProject India
168:
167:
164:
163:
108:and see lists of
1749:
1659:
1658:
1627:
1623:
1613:
1612:
1606:
1589:Rajivkodiyathoor
1469:
1454:
1206:
1201:
1139:Leopard or Tiger
942:background score
926:Malayalam cinema
823:background score
693:
692:
662:
658:
648:
647:
641:
605:reliable sources
595:
594:
565:
561:
551:
550:
544:
522:reliable sources
516:
515:
484:
480:
470:
469:
463:
449:
447:
440:
410:Tangerine (film)
361:WikiProject Film
347:
345:
338:
253:
252:
249:
246:
243:
220:
215:
214:
213:
204:
197:
196:
191:
188:
177:
170:
138:
137:
134:
131:
128:
101:WikiProject Film
95:
90:
89:
88:
79:
72:
71:
66:
55:
48:
31:
25:
24:
16:
1757:
1756:
1752:
1751:
1750:
1748:
1747:
1746:
1682:
1681:
1656:
1649:
1625:
1621:
1610:
1604:
1584:
1467:
1448:
1410:
1391:
1242:
1202:
1199:
1141:
938:Sooraj S. Kurup
930:S. P. Venkatesh
719:
690:
660:
656:
645:
639:
592:
563:
559:
548:
542:
513:
482:
478:
467:
461:
443:
436:
434:
341:
334:
332:
314:
250:
247:
244:
241:
240:
216:
211:
209:
189:
183:
135:
132:
129:
126:
125:
91:
86:
84:
61:
32:on Knowledge's
29:
12:
11:
5:
1755:
1753:
1745:
1744:
1739:
1734:
1729:
1724:
1719:
1714:
1709:
1704:
1699:
1694:
1684:
1683:
1680:
1679:
1637:
1634:
1633:
1614:
1603:
1600:
1583:
1580:
1579:
1578:
1577:
1576:
1575:
1574:
1535:
1534:
1533:
1532:
1531:
1530:
1491:
1490:
1409:
1406:
1390:
1387:
1386:
1385:
1370:
1369:
1368:
1367:
1366:
1365:
1364:
1324:103.196.230.41
1320:
1296:103.196.230.41
1283:
1282:
1245:Recent removal
1241:
1238:
1237:
1236:
1235:
1234:
1233:
1232:
1231:
1230:
1140:
1137:
1117:
1116:
1115:
1114:
1113:
1112:
1111:
1110:
1109:
1108:
1107:
1106:
1105:
1104:
1103:
1102:
1101:
1100:
1068:
1067:
1066:
1065:
1064:
1063:
1062:
1061:
1060:
1059:
1058:
1057:
1056:
1055:
1054:
1053:
1036:worked on the
758:original claim
718:
715:
714:
713:
699:WP: ANTAGONIST
669:
668:
649:
638:
635:
634:
633:
619:
602:
600:
578:117.207.233.40
572:
571:
552:
541:
538:
537:
536:
491:
490:
471:
460:
457:
456:
455:
454:
453:
427:
426:
425:
424:
386:Charles Turing
375:
329:Charles Turing
313:
310:
307:
306:
303:
302:
299:
298:
295:Mid-importance
285:
275:
274:
267:Low-importance
263:
257:
256:
254:
251:India articles
222:
221:
205:
193:
192:
190:Low‑importance
178:
166:
165:
162:
161:
152:
142:
141:
139:
97:
96:
80:
68:
67:
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1754:
1743:
1740:
1738:
1735:
1733:
1730:
1728:
1725:
1723:
1720:
1718:
1715:
1713:
1710:
1708:
1705:
1703:
1700:
1698:
1695:
1693:
1690:
1689:
1687:
1678:
1674:
1670:
1666:
1662:
1654:
1653:
1652:
1648:
1644:
1640:
1639:176.205.239.2
1631:
1628:parameter to
1619:
1615:
1608:
1607:
1601:
1599:
1598:
1594:
1590:
1581:
1572:
1568:
1564:
1560:
1556:
1550:
1546:
1541:
1540:
1539:
1538:
1537:
1536:
1529:
1525:
1521:
1517:
1516:
1515:
1511:
1507:
1506:112.133.248.3
1503:
1499:
1495:
1494:
1493:
1492:
1489:
1485:
1481:
1477:
1473:
1465:
1464:
1459:
1452:
1447:
1446:
1445:
1443:
1439:
1435:
1431:
1427:
1420:
1417:
1413:
1407:
1405:
1404:
1400:
1396:
1395:Arjunbala9899
1388:
1384:
1380:
1376:
1371:
1363:
1359:
1355:
1351:
1350:
1345:
1340:
1335:
1334:
1333:
1329:
1325:
1321:
1319:
1315:
1311:
1307:
1306:
1305:
1301:
1297:
1293:
1292:
1291:
1290:
1289:
1288:
1281:
1277:
1273:
1268:
1267:
1266:
1264:
1260:
1256:
1255:59.96.167.202
1252:
1246:
1239:
1229:
1225:
1221:
1217:
1213:
1212:
1211:
1208:
1207:
1205:
1194:
1193:
1192:
1188:
1184:
1180:
1179:
1178:
1174:
1170:
1166:
1165:
1164:
1163:
1159:
1155:
1151:
1147:
1138:
1136:
1135:
1131:
1127:
1123:
1099:
1095:
1091:
1086:
1085:
1084:
1083:
1082:
1081:
1080:
1079:
1078:
1077:
1076:
1075:
1074:
1073:
1072:
1071:
1070:
1069:
1052:
1048:
1044:
1039:
1035:
1031:
1026:
1022:
1019:
1014:
1010:
1006:
1003:when he says
1002:
998:
994:
990:
989:
988:
984:
980:
976:
973:
972:
971:
967:
963:
959:
955:
951:
947:
943:
939:
935:
931:
927:
923:
919:
916:in the past.
915:
911:
907:
903:
902:
897:
893:
890:
889:
888:
884:
880:
875:
874:
873:
869:
865:
860:
859:
858:
854:
850:
846:
842:
838:
834:
833:
828:
824:
820:
816:
812:
808:
804:
800:
797:
796:
795:
791:
787:
783:
778:
777:
776:
772:
768:
763:
759:
755:
754:
753:
752:
748:
744:
740:
735:
731:
727:
724:
716:
712:
708:
704:
700:
696:
688:
687:
686:
685:
681:
677:
676:202.88.250.89
666:
663:parameter to
654:
650:
643:
642:
636:
632:
628:
624:
620:
618:
614:
610:
606:
598:
590:
589:
588:
587:
583:
579:
569:
566:parameter to
557:
553:
546:
545:
539:
535:
531:
527:
523:
519:
511:
510:
509:
508:
504:
500:
496:
488:
485:parameter to
476:
472:
465:
464:
458:
452:
448:
446:
441:
439:
431:
430:
429:
428:
423:
419:
415:
411:
406:
401:
398:What part of
397:
396:
395:
391:
387:
383:
382:
376:
374:
370:
366:
362:
358:
353:
352:
351:
350:
346:
344:
339:
337:
330:
326:
322:
318:
311:
296:
293:(assessed as
292:
291:
281:
277:
276:
272:
268:
262:
259:
258:
255:
238:
237:
232:
228:
227:
219:
208:
206:
203:
199:
198:
194:
187:
182:
179:
176:
172:
159:
158:
148:
144:
143:
140:
136:film articles
123:
119:
118:documentation
115:
111:
107:
103:
102:
94:
83:
81:
78:
74:
73:
69:
65:
60:
57:
54:
50:
45:
41:
35:
27:
23:
18:
17:
1660:
1650:
1629:
1618:edit request
1585:
1553:— Preceding
1549:edit request
1502:edit request
1497:
1471:
1461:
1424:— Preceding
1421:
1418:
1414:
1411:
1392:
1347:
1338:
1284:
1249:— Preceding
1243:
1203:
1198:
1142:
1118:
1033:
1029:
1025:re-recording
1017:
1012:
1005:re-recording
993:re-recording
954:re-recording
950:re-recording
946:re-recording
922:Ranjit Barot
918:A. R. Rahman
910:Blade Runner
899:
844:
830:
815:re-recording
807:re-recording
730:re-recording
720:
694:
672:
664:
653:edit request
596:
575:
567:
556:edit request
517:
497:
494:
486:
475:edit request
444:
437:
404:
379:
342:
335:
315:
312:Lead Section
288:
266:
236:project page
234:
224:
218:India portal
155:
99:
40:WikiProjects
1520:Cyphoidbomb
1480:Cyphoidbomb
1375:Cyphoidbomb
1339:Pulimurugan
1169:Cyphoidbomb
1126:Cyphoidbomb
1124:. Regards,
1088:clear now.
1032:Sunder has
1013:programmers
901:programming
892:Cyphoidbomb
879:Cyphoidbomb
837:Gopi Sunder
827:Gopi Sunder
805:. The term
799:Cyphoidbomb
786:Cyphoidbomb
743:Cyphoidbomb
723:this matter
703:Cyphoidbomb
499:Sanuraj1983
414:Cyphoidbomb
400:WP:FILMLEAD
365:Cyphoidbomb
325:Cyphoidbomb
321:WP:FILMLEAD
93:Film portal
1686:Categories
1622:|answered=
1545:guidelines
1476:Catch News
1354:John"Eddy"
1310:John"Eddy"
1272:John"Eddy"
1038:film score
1021:film score
1001:film score
997:film score
832:programmed
819:film score
811:film score
803:film score
657:|answered=
623:Jean Stair
560:|answered=
479:|answered=
438:Nairspecht
336:Nairspecht
122:guidelines
110:open tasks
1661:Not done:
934:Rahul Raj
695:Not done:
597:Not done:
518:Not done:
381:Thuppakki
1567:contribs
1559:Tousifmt
1555:unsigned
1451:Tousifmt
1438:contribs
1430:Tousifmt
1426:unsigned
1251:unsigned
1216:footnote
924:too! In
906:Vangelis
841:composer
445:Converse
357:MOS:FILM
343:Converse
331:? Best,
1389:Release
1200:Jupitus
1146:Leopard
762:altered
609:Arjayay
526:Arjayay
269:on the
30:C-class
1463:Kabali
1122:WP:BRD
958:Masala
186:Cinema
64:Indian
36:scale.
1626:|ans=
1616:This
1472:never
1204:Smart
1150:Tiger
914:India
661:|ans=
651:This
564:|ans=
554:This
483:|ans=
473:This
405:might
242:India
231:India
181:India
1673:talk
1643:talk
1593:talk
1563:talk
1524:talk
1510:talk
1484:talk
1434:talk
1399:talk
1379:talk
1358:talk
1328:talk
1314:talk
1300:talk
1276:talk
1259:talk
1224:talk
1187:talk
1173:talk
1158:talk
1130:talk
1094:talk
1047:talk
1023:and
983:talk
966:talk
936:and
883:talk
868:talk
853:talk
821:(or
790:talk
771:talk
747:talk
707:talk
680:talk
627:talk
613:talk
582:talk
530:talk
503:talk
418:talk
390:talk
369:talk
127:Film
112:and
59:Film
1624:or
1346:of
1034:not
944:as
845:not
701:.
659:or
562:or
481:or
261:Low
1688::
1675:)
1645:)
1630:no
1595:)
1569:)
1565:•
1526:)
1512:)
1486:)
1440:)
1436:•
1401:)
1381:)
1360:)
1330:)
1316:)
1302:)
1278:)
1261:)
1226:)
1189:)
1175:)
1160:)
1132:)
1096:)
1049:)
1030:2:
1018:1:
985:)
968:)
932:,
885:)
870:)
855:)
792:)
773:)
749:)
709:)
682:)
665:no
629:)
615:)
584:)
568:no
532:)
505:)
487:no
420:)
392:)
371:)
327:?
297:).
184::
62::
1671:(
1641:(
1591:(
1561:(
1522:(
1508:(
1482:(
1468:â‚ą
1453::
1449:@
1432:(
1397:(
1377:(
1356:(
1326:(
1312:(
1298:(
1274:(
1257:(
1222:(
1185:(
1171:(
1156:(
1128:(
1092:(
1045:(
981:(
964:(
881:(
866:(
851:(
788:(
769:(
745:(
705:(
678:(
625:(
611:(
580:(
528:(
501:(
416:(
388:(
367:(
273:.
239:.
160:.
124:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
