1054:
clarifying word to the title in brackets. Also it probably needs to be split / changed so that the lead gets trimmed off things like "The term robotic automation or robotization refer to the automation of industrial and business processes using robots, of various guises" and "Examples of robotic automation include the use of industrial robots in manufacturing" - these sentences describe the broad robotic automization software and not this class of software products that somewhat mimicks persons. I also said in this talk page discussion that I'm not sure whether the article trimmed of said content would be notable enough on its own and that an article on the broad concept would probably be useful / needed separately of this article and under a different name. However, for that to happen it also needs a clear distinctions between it and the even broader
428:
410:
106:
85:
496:
478:
211:
190:
382:
322:
295:
54:
506:
221:
116:
21:
1104:
either me or various off-WP writers (cf. the "ZOMFG!!" stuff) than with the requested move discussion. WP is not a battleground, nor a soapbox. Please do post post enormous blocks of text and tables in the middle of RMs, RfCs, or other comments sections; we use extended discussion sections below polls for a reason.
1103:
one). The fact remains that the present title is a failure, because the article's scope is not limited to software. If you don't like the proposed move, suggest a better alternative. I decline to respond to the rest of this, as it's too ranty and off-topic, and has more to do with trying to mock
958:
How could you understand if you didn't take the time to examine the sources to see if they are actually about the topic? How many of them actually use the term "robotic automation"? About four if you don't include the duplicate HfS ("Horses for
Sources") marketing research "click here to download
1053:
earlier and subsequently I more or less agree with him wouldn't consider the suggested page move anymore. There's still a problem of the article's title seemingly referring to a way broader concept than what it's used for and what the article describes. So maybe it would be good to append some
959:
your free copy of our report"!!! come-on. And none of the ones that actually use the phrase "robotic automation" really go into any depth other than to sensationalize the "Z0MFG!! S0FTWAREZ CAN CLICKETY-CLICK 0N 0THER S0FTWAREZ!1!!@ MASS UNEMPL0YMENTZ!1!!!" aspect.
965:
If he's convinced that the entire article is bogus, or that parts of it are and that the rest should be merged into other articles, that is not a WP:RM matter and has nothing to do with resolving the issue before us, which is a conflict between title and
928:, a software solution originally sold by a robotics company called Blue Prism, but now apparently a "market segment" as defined by Gartner, Forrester Research and a whole bunch of software vendors whose websites are used as "sources" for
1018:
as the article title. "Robotic automation" could appear therein as a synonym and/or as a passage describing Blue Prism, their software solution, their competitors, and discuss the "sky-is-falling" sensationalist media reaction
593:
826:
by someone who apparently intended to come back and write an article on the subject. The proposer should start with reliable sources and use the name or names from those reliable sources instead of inventing a new term. --
856:). I don't understand DanielPenfield's objection; the article has sources. If he's convinced that the entire article is bogus, or that parts of it are and that the rest should be merged into other articles, that is not a
653:
1078:
This massive wall o' text is mostly predicated on a fallacy, that the sources have to use the term "robotic automation" or "robotic automation software", which they do not. Our article title is a descriptive title
942:
Furthermore, you actually expect readers to believe that the "robotic automation" term invented in 2012 or 2013 is the first time somebody described the societal effects of automation due to software? Sounds like
1006:, he or she should NOT start with sales pitch-masquerading-as-reports from marketing research firms or low-quality sensationalist articles from two or three years ago. Instead, he or she should identify
932:. If "robotic automation" is truly a "thing" worthy of an article, why is it so difficult to find 1) sources actually about the phenomenon and which also call that phenomenon "robotic automation" as
924:
that I placed above, half the results for "robotic automation" refer to the use of industrial robots to automate manufacturing processes (which this article is NOT about) and the other half refer to
1231:
936:
requires and 2) sources that are "independent of the subject"ānot links to firms selling the software or marketing research companies selling reports about the software "market segment"āas
910:
Support per WP:CONCISE and the principle that our article titles have to agree with article scope (one way or another - sometimes such a conflict is resolved with a WP:SPLIT or WP:MERGE).
587:
1196:
1191:
162:
1091:). I don't object to the argument, but it requires more analysis. If the majority of uses of the phrase pertain to something within the scope of this article, then it is the
647:
716:
749:
and there is no article about robot automation / robotization yet. If important information about non-software aspects is missing it simply can and should be added.
277:
372:
172:
1271:
1236:
1226:
1211:
1206:
362:
267:
998:
If someone really wants to write an article on the societal impacts of software-specific automation that he or she doesn't think are already covered in
1256:
1241:
1221:
1276:
1261:
1083:), not a proper name. All that is required is that it be neutral and descriptive of the article content/scope. I think Penfield is approaching a
528:
1216:
243:
1266:
1201:
860:
matter and has nothing to do with resolving the issue before us, which is a conflict between title and scope. The forum he is looking for is
848:
and the principle that our article titles have to agree with article scope (one way or another - sometimes such a conflict is resolved with a
444:
338:
138:
713:. After reviewing the discussion and statements given, it appears the nom withdrew their support for the move and it had opposition as well.
608:
1095:
for that term. If not, then we need another title, or perhaps this article should be split or merged in some way (which may be more of a
700:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
575:
519:
483:
391:
305:
234:
195:
1116:
876:
435:
415:
329:
300:
129:
90:
668:
1246:
635:
35:
65:
1251:
569:
226:
802:. If the claim that "there is no article about robot automation / robotization" is true, then what are these articles:
565:
1137:
691:
988:
736:
629:
1162:
1088:
1003:
992:
971:
929:
925:
803:
615:
31:
947:. "Why, there was no such thing before 2012, but just in case there was, let's use the most recent name for it!"
137:
articles on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1092:
1031:
832:
625:
1147:
701:
71:
53:
1087:
argument, since this term is sometimes used to mean other things (manufacturing automation by robots, and
675:
944:
581:
1173:
1113:
918:
873:
527:
on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
443:
on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
337:
on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
242:
on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
799:
427:
409:
1084:
845:
27:
1027:
828:
661:
601:
105:
84:
1069:
1050:
819:
760:
1080:
853:
849:
641:
815:
776:
511:
1169:
1107:
1044:
867:
807:
1096:
937:
933:
861:
791:
121:
1100:
1007:
857:
795:
1177:
1125:
1073:
1035:
1010:
from the 1950s, 1960s, 1970s, 1980s, 1990s, 2000s, up to today that actually answer the
885:
836:
780:
729:
1166:
1049:
DanielPenfield has provided some detailed information on the article and his rationale
39:
495:
477:
1185:
1059:
750:
381:
772:
210:
189:
321:
294:
1146:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a
1055:
999:
811:
524:
505:
501:
216:
111:
723:
239:
984:
There are at least two way more constructive actions that one could take:
220:
115:
746:
440:
334:
134:
1167:
https://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Robotic_process_automation#Merger_proposal
1011:
954:
I don't understand DanielPenfield's objection; the article has sources.
47:
15:
380:
970:
Wait, so you want to rename it before redirecting it to
823:
790:
The subject of this article doesn't appear to meet the
741:
660:
600:
1136:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
1014:
of the phenomenon and use the most widely-used term
523:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
439:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
333:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
238:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
133:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
1232:
Redirect-Class software articles of High-importance
704:. No further edits should be made to this section.
674:
614:
1150:. No further edits should be made to this section.
64:does not require a rating on Knowledge (XXG)'s
8:
1197:Low-importance WikiProject Business articles
1192:Redirect-Class WikiProject Business articles
1165:- please discuss the merger proposal here:
690:The following is a closed discussion of a
472:
404:
289:
184:
79:
1161:I've proposed merging this article with
897:
474:
406:
291:
186:
81:
980:The forum he is looking for is WP:AFD.
537:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Technology
517:This redirect is within the scope of
433:This redirect is within the scope of
327:This redirect is within the scope of
252:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Economics
232:This redirect is within the scope of
127:This redirect is within the scope of
51:
7:
709:The result of the move request was:
453:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Robotics
347:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Software
147:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Business
914:Why is it that when I click on the
70:It is of interest to the following
1272:Redirect-Class Technology articles
14:
1237:Redirect-Class Computing articles
1227:High-importance software articles
1212:Mid-importance Economics articles
1207:Redirect-Class Economics articles
34:on April 25, 2020. The result of
1257:Redirect-Class Robotics articles
1242:NA-importance Computing articles
1222:Redirect-Class software articles
745:ā This article isn't just about
504:
494:
476:
426:
408:
367:This redirect has been rated as
320:
293:
272:This redirect has been rated as
219:
209:
188:
167:This redirect has been rated as
114:
104:
83:
52:
19:
1277:WikiProject Technology articles
1262:NA-importance Robotics articles
540:Template:WikiProject Technology
26:This article was nominated for
1217:WikiProject Economics articles
1016:actually used in those sources
763:) 00:32, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
717:closed by non-admin page mover
389:This redirect is supported by
255:Template:WikiProject Economics
1:
1267:WikiProject Robotics articles
1202:WikiProject Business articles
1105:
865:
683:Requested move 5 January 2017
531:and see a list of open tasks.
456:Template:WikiProject Robotics
447:and see a list of open tasks.
350:Template:WikiProject Software
341:and see a list of open tasks.
246:and see a list of open tasks.
227:Business and economics portal
153:WikiProject Business articles
150:Template:WikiProject Business
141:and see a list of open tasks.
1126:13:59, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
1074:22:24, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
1036:19:55, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
886:02:30, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
837:12:42, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
781:14:58, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
730:23:05, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
989:Robotic automation software
737:Robotic automation software
1293:
1178:19:38, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
1163:Robotic process automation
1089:robotic process automation
1004:Technological unemployment
993:Robotic process automation
972:Robotic process automation
930:Robotic process automation
926:Robotic process automation
904:DanielPenfield's response
804:Robotic process automation
373:project's importance scale
278:project's importance scale
173:project's importance scale
32:Robotic process automation
945:Knowledge (XXG):Recentism
794:and appears to be mostly
489:
421:
388:
366:
315:
271:
204:
166:
99:
78:
1143:Please do not modify it.
697:Please do not modify it.
901:SMcCandlish's statement
1247:All Computing articles
520:WikiProject Technology
385:
1252:All Software articles
818:? Even the redirect
392:WikiProject Computing
384:
235:WikiProject Economics
436:WikiProject Robotics
330:WikiProject Software
130:WikiProject Business
892:Extended discussion
543:Technology articles
1099:discussion than a
820:Factory automation
742:Robotic automation
386:
258:Economics articles
66:content assessment
1025:
1024:
816:Office automation
783:
720:
559:
558:
555:
554:
551:
550:
512:Technology portal
471:
470:
467:
466:
459:Robotics articles
403:
402:
399:
398:
353:software articles
288:
287:
284:
283:
183:
182:
179:
178:
46:
45:
1284:
1145:
1124:
1048:
923:
917:
898:
884:
808:Industrial robot
764:
744:
726:
714:
699:
679:
678:
664:
619:
618:
604:
545:
544:
541:
538:
535:
514:
509:
508:
498:
491:
490:
480:
473:
461:
460:
457:
454:
451:
430:
423:
422:
412:
405:
355:
354:
351:
348:
345:
324:
317:
316:
311:
308:
297:
290:
260:
259:
256:
253:
250:
229:
224:
223:
213:
206:
205:
200:
192:
185:
155:
154:
151:
148:
145:
124:
119:
118:
108:
101:
100:
95:
87:
80:
57:
56:
48:
23:
22:
16:
1292:
1291:
1287:
1286:
1285:
1283:
1282:
1281:
1182:
1181:
1159:
1157:Merger proposed
1154:
1141:
1122:
1093:WP:PRIMARYTOPIC
1051:on my talk page
1042:
921:
915:
894:
882:
822:was created as
740:
724:
695:
685:
621:
561:
542:
539:
536:
533:
532:
510:
503:
458:
455:
452:
449:
448:
369:High-importance
352:
349:
346:
343:
342:
310:Highāimportance
309:
303:
257:
254:
251:
248:
247:
225:
218:
198:
152:
149:
146:
143:
142:
122:Business portal
120:
113:
93:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1290:
1288:
1280:
1279:
1274:
1269:
1264:
1259:
1254:
1249:
1244:
1239:
1234:
1229:
1224:
1219:
1214:
1209:
1204:
1199:
1194:
1184:
1183:
1158:
1155:
1153:
1152:
1138:requested move
1132:
1131:
1130:
1129:
1128:
1120:
1039:
1038:
1028:DanielPenfield
1023:
1022:
1021:
1020:
996:
982:
976:
975:
968:
961:
960:
956:
950:
949:
912:
906:
905:
902:
893:
890:
889:
888:
880:
839:
829:DanielPenfield
735:
733:
707:
706:
692:requested move
686:
684:
681:
620:
557:
556:
553:
552:
549:
548:
546:
529:the discussion
516:
515:
499:
487:
486:
481:
469:
468:
465:
464:
462:
445:the discussion
431:
419:
418:
413:
401:
400:
397:
396:
387:
377:
376:
365:
359:
358:
356:
339:the discussion
325:
313:
312:
298:
286:
285:
282:
281:
274:Mid-importance
270:
264:
263:
261:
244:the discussion
231:
230:
214:
202:
201:
199:Midāimportance
193:
181:
180:
177:
176:
169:Low-importance
165:
159:
158:
156:
139:the discussion
126:
125:
109:
97:
96:
94:Lowāimportance
88:
76:
75:
69:
58:
44:
43:
40:permanent link
36:the discussion
24:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1289:
1278:
1275:
1273:
1270:
1268:
1265:
1263:
1260:
1258:
1255:
1253:
1250:
1248:
1245:
1243:
1240:
1238:
1235:
1233:
1230:
1228:
1225:
1223:
1220:
1218:
1215:
1213:
1210:
1208:
1205:
1203:
1200:
1198:
1195:
1193:
1190:
1189:
1187:
1180:
1179:
1175:
1171:
1168:
1164:
1156:
1151:
1149:
1144:
1139:
1134:
1133:
1127:
1118:
1115:
1112:
1110:
1102:
1098:
1094:
1090:
1086:
1082:
1077:
1076:
1075:
1071:
1067:
1066:
1062:
1057:
1052:
1046:
1041:
1040:
1037:
1033:
1029:
1017:
1013:
1009:
1005:
1001:
997:
994:
990:
986:
985:
983:
981:
978:
977:
973:
969:
967:
963:
962:
957:
955:
952:
951:
948:
946:
939:
935:
931:
927:
920:
913:
911:
908:
907:
903:
900:
899:
896:
895:
891:
887:
878:
875:
872:
870:
863:
859:
855:
851:
847:
843:
840:
838:
834:
830:
825:
824:a placeholder
821:
817:
813:
809:
805:
801:
798:or unsourced
797:
793:
789:
786:
785:
784:
782:
778:
774:
770:
769:
762:
758:
757:
753:
748:
743:
738:
732:
731:
728:
727:
718:
712:
705:
703:
698:
693:
688:
687:
682:
680:
677:
673:
670:
667:
663:
659:
655:
652:
649:
646:
643:
640:
637:
634:
631:
627:
624:
623:Find sources:
617:
613:
610:
607:
603:
599:
595:
592:
589:
586:
583:
580:
577:
574:
571:
567:
564:
563:Find sources:
547:
530:
526:
522:
521:
513:
507:
502:
500:
497:
493:
492:
488:
485:
482:
479:
475:
463:
446:
442:
438:
437:
432:
429:
425:
424:
420:
417:
414:
411:
407:
394:
393:
383:
379:
378:
374:
370:
364:
361:
360:
357:
340:
336:
332:
331:
326:
323:
319:
318:
314:
307:
302:
299:
296:
292:
279:
275:
269:
266:
265:
262:
245:
241:
237:
236:
228:
222:
217:
215:
212:
208:
207:
203:
197:
194:
191:
187:
174:
170:
164:
161:
160:
157:
140:
136:
132:
131:
123:
117:
112:
110:
107:
103:
102:
98:
92:
89:
86:
82:
77:
73:
67:
63:
59:
55:
50:
49:
41:
37:
33:
29:
25:
18:
17:
1160:
1142:
1135:
1108:
1064:
1060:
1058:article. --
1015:
979:
964:
953:
941:
919:Find sources
909:
868:
841:
787:
767:
766:
755:
751:
734:
722:
710:
708:
696:
689:
671:
665:
657:
650:
644:
638:
632:
622:
611:
605:
597:
590:
584:
578:
572:
562:
560:
518:
434:
390:
368:
328:
273:
233:
168:
128:
72:WikiProjects
61:
42:) was Merge.
1170:Stonkaments
1148:move review
1109:SMcCandlish
1045:SMcCandlish
869:SMcCandlish
702:move review
648:free images
588:free images
1186:Categories
1085:WP:PRECISE
1056:automation
1000:Automation
940:requires?
846:WP:CONCISE
812:Automation
768:Relisting.
534:Technology
525:technology
484:Technology
987:Redirect
711:Not moved
306:Computing
249:Economics
240:Economics
196:Economics
1081:WP:NDESC
854:WP:MERGE
850:WP:SPLIT
747:software
450:Robotics
441:Robotics
416:Robotics
344:Software
335:software
301:Software
144:Business
135:business
91:Business
62:redirect
1012:Five Ws
842:Support
773:Amakuru
654:WPĀ refs
642:scholar
594:WPĀ refs
582:scholar
371:on the
276:on the
171:on the
28:merging
1097:WP:AFD
1019:there.
966:scope.
938:WP:GNG
934:WP:GNG
862:WP:AFD
792:WP:GNG
788:Oppose
626:Google
566:Google
68:scale.
1101:WP:RM
1065:uture
1008:WP:RS
858:WP:RM
800:essay
796:WP:OR
756:uture
669:JSTOR
630:books
609:JSTOR
570:books
60:This
30:with
1174:talk
1070:talk
1032:talk
995:, or
844:per
833:talk
777:talk
761:talk
725:Dane
662:FENS
636:news
602:FENS
576:news
363:High
1140:.
1123:ā±·ā¼
1119:ā½ā±·Ņ
1026:--
1002:or
991:to
883:ā±·ā¼
879:ā½ā±·Ņ
852:or
721:--
676:TWL
616:TWL
268:Mid
163:Low
1188::
1176:)
1106:ā
1072:)
1063:ix
1034:)
974:?
922:}}
916:{{
866:ā
864:.
835:)
814:,
810:,
806:,
779:)
771:ā
765:--
754:ix
739:ā
694:.
656:)
596:)
304::
1172:(
1121:į“„
1117:Ā¢
1114:ā
1111:āŗ
1079:(
1068:(
1061:F
1047::
1043:@
1030:(
881:į“„
877:Ā¢
874:ā
871:āŗ
831:(
775:(
759:(
752:F
719:)
715:(
672:Ā·
666:Ā·
658:Ā·
651:Ā·
645:Ā·
639:Ā·
633:Ā·
628:(
612:Ā·
606:Ā·
598:Ā·
591:Ā·
585:Ā·
579:Ā·
573:Ā·
568:(
395:.
375:.
280:.
175:.
74::
38:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
