274:
822:- Thanks for taking a look. I've added an 1863 woodcut of the battle itself. The other option would be File:Ag2008 0005 1 02 10 gregg opt.jpg, which probably needs a rename on Commons (I plan on requesting the rename to something more meaningful tomorrow). For the title, I agree that it's probably better to move it, but I'll be opening a RM on it and placing a neutral notice notice at the project talk page, as a move of this would likely be precedent-setting, as it seems that about all of the entries in
361:
334:
306:
371:
464:
290:
476:
159:
33:
231:
220:
209:
198:
187:
830:. Seems like a more centralized discussion for naming orbats is needed. I'll be opening that RM tomorrow, once I get some sleep. I'll also deal with the other points tomorrow and send it through ACR once I get a nomination cleared through there, as I don't like having more than three ACR noms open at a time, as I feel like I'm overwhelming the process.
99:
64:
799:
Happy to re-assess as BL as soon as image(s) have been added. Some suggestions include a portrait of Gregg or another a
Confederate commander who was an important influence on the outcome of the battle, images of the guns used by the artillery in the battle, a map of the battle etc. See the Yugoslav
625:
Avoiding the removal of essential information is better: "Confederate order of battle at the Battle of
Raymond" is unambiguous and clear even to readers unfamiliar with the topic; as well as being more in line with what you would expect (Since, in some cases - maybe not this one, but for
281:
74:
297:
78:
589:
are in the format of "Raymond
Confederate order of battle" or "Camp Wildcat Union order of battle". It makes sense to me to try to get a standardized naming system for these orbats, so its consistent across the encyclopedia.
848:; we should be taking the lead from the existing FL orbats which have been reviewed by a number of experienced Milhist editors rather than how one or two individuals have decided to title ORBAT lists for the ACW. Now BL.
313:
82:
608:- at least in this case - the meaning of the current title isn't very clear - it isn't apparent that this applies to the Battle of Raymond, rather than to someone with the strange name of Raymond Confederate.
795:
Carrying that point on, you shouldn't rehash the battle article background and body in the lead of the orbat list, the lead of the list should just summarise the order of battle, not the battle itself.
729:, this is my preferred titling. I also agree that a combined ORBAT for the battle is probably better, this one isn't massive, and I doubt the Union one is either given the size of the engagement.
919:
884:
789:
894:
879:
889:
401:
655:
Separate from my !vote above: the two orders of battle for this engagement are both rather too short to warrant separate articles: maybe merging them could be considered an option?
767:
418:
172:
149:
111:
785:, that battle is very famous internationally, and Midway is synonymous with the battle. This battle is obscure, and the title needs to clearly explain what the list is about.
634:
is also inconsistent, and might need further clean-up after this. If this RM goes ahead I'd suggest a mass-proposal for all of those in the category above to be moved too.
544:
454:
158:
792:
for an example from an FL. This means adding any detail to the body (with citations) that you want to include in the lead, then removing the citations from the lead.
904:
770:. However, it needs an image for b5=y, and if you add one, I'll assess it as BL-class. For this reason, I have assessed it as List-class for now, rather than Start.
677:
weight on the listing of the individual units. With the sources discussing the component parts of the two sides, it seems that the split-out pages are warranted.
914:
444:
408:
899:
929:
823:
586:
494:
939:
874:
139:
413:
909:
934:
106:
69:
924:
627:
766:
In general terms, long before ORBATs get to
Featured status, they are generally classed as lists rather than articles. See the eleven FL ORBATs at
844:
Sure. A central discussion is a good idea. The other ACW ones are equally as problematic in terms of being distinguishable and recognizable per
626:
consistency's sake we should try to follow such an unambiguous approach - a place name could refer to both a battle and a larger operation; ex.
384:
339:
115:
774:
711:
664:
643:
489:
344:
529:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
564:
396:
778:
392:
on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
788:
In general, the "lead" of a list should be like the lead of an article, and should only summarise the content of the list. See
699:
44:
827:
751:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
520:
857:
839:
809:
738:
715:
686:
668:
647:
617:
599:
557:
631:
845:
707:
660:
639:
530:
50:
110:. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
853:
805:
782:
734:
273:
553:
17:
549:
376:
703:
656:
635:
613:
533:
after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
835:
682:
595:
481:
674:
360:
333:
849:
817:
801:
730:
762:
A few things, nothing of which affects the List-class assessment of the list as it stands:
573:– Looking at the MILHIST Fls, there seems to be two types of naming - "Order of battle at
609:
305:
868:
831:
693:
678:
591:
389:
463:
289:
698:
I was thinking of merging the
Confederate and Union OOBs together on a new page (
471:
366:
388:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
673:
I'm of the opinion that merging both into the parent article would place
826:
are formatted in this way, including incredibly obscure stuff like
98:
63:
26:
790:
Yugoslav order of battle prior to the invasion of
Yugoslavia
462:
304:
288:
272:
157:
768:
Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject
Military history/Showcase/FL
800:
example for the sort of thing that might work. Cheers,
569:
775:
Confederate order of battle for the Battle of
Raymond
570:
Confederate order of battle at the Battle of
Raymond
170:
This article has been checked against the following
920:
List-Class United States articles of Low-importance
885:
North American military history task force articles
255:
169:
895:United States military history task force articles
880:BL-Class North American military history articles
890:BL-Class United States military history articles
779:Battle of Raymond Confederate order of battle
777:(my preference, putting the force first), or
577:" when both sides are on the same orbat, or "
8:
824:Category:American Civil War orders of battle
587:Category:American Civil War orders of battle
124:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Military history
519:The following is a closed discussion of a
328:
282:North American military history task force
252:
166:
58:
32:
30:
429:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject United States
298:United States military history task force
700:Order of battle at the Battle of Raymond
628:Order of battle of the Waterloo campaign
104:This article is within the scope of the
18:Talk:Raymond Confederate order of battle
585:". However, about all the articles in
330:
60:
905:American Civil War task force articles
114:. To use this banner, please see the
915:Low-importance United States articles
127:Template:WikiProject Military history
7:
900:BL-Class American Civil War articles
538:The result of the move request was:
382:This article is within the scope of
930:Low-importance Mississippi articles
781:. While I can see the argument for
565:Raymond Confederate order of battle
49:It is of interest to the following
940:WikiProject United States articles
875:BL-Class military history articles
432:Template:WikiProject United States
25:
910:List-Class United States articles
747:The discussion above is closed.
935:WikiProject Mississippi articles
474:
369:
359:
332:
229:
218:
207:
196:
185:
97:
62:
31:
925:List-Class Mississippi articles
449:This article has been rated as
144:This article has been rated as
828:Carnifex Ferry order of battle
702:), not with the main article.
512:Requested move 21 January 2021
1:
487:This article is supported by
314:American Civil War task force
858:06:46, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
840:05:48, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
810:05:34, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
739:08:53, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
716:15:53, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
687:15:50, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
669:15:46, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
648:15:44, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
618:21:46, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
600:14:24, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
558:16:11, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
107:Military history WikiProject
773:I suggest moving to either
956:
455:project's importance scale
190:Referencing and citation:
632:Category:Orders_of_battle
470:
448:
385:WikiProject United States
354:
312:
296:
280:
251:
143:
130:military history articles
92:
57:
749:Please do not modify it.
526:Please do not modify it.
390:United States of America
490:WikiProject Mississippi
256:Associated task forces:
201:Coverage and accuracy:
783:Midway order of battle
467:
435:United States articles
309:
293:
277:
234:Supporting materials:
162:
39:This article is rated
466:
308:
292:
276:
161:
43:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
377:United States portal
854:click to talk to me
806:click to talk to me
735:click to talk to me
581:order of battle at
403:Articles Requested!
223:Grammar and style:
176:for B-class status:
482:Mississippi portal
468:
310:
294:
278:
163:
112:list of open tasks
83:American Civil War
45:content assessment
548:
545:non-admin closure
509:
508:
505:
504:
501:
500:
327:
326:
323:
322:
319:
318:
247:
246:
148:on the project's
116:full instructions
16:(Redirected from
947:
821:
697:
572:
542:
528:
484:
479:
478:
477:
437:
436:
433:
430:
427:
379:
374:
373:
372:
363:
356:
355:
350:
347:
336:
329:
263:
253:
237:
233:
232:
226:
222:
221:
215:
211:
210:
204:
200:
199:
193:
189:
188:
167:
132:
131:
128:
125:
122:
121:Military history
101:
94:
93:
88:
85:
70:Military history
66:
59:
42:
36:
35:
34:
27:
21:
955:
954:
950:
949:
948:
946:
945:
944:
865:
864:
846:WP:ARTICLETITLE
838:
815:
760:
755:
691:
685:
598:
568:
524:
514:
480:
475:
473:
434:
431:
428:
425:
424:
423:
409:Become a Member
375:
370:
368:
348:
342:
261:
235:
230:
224:
219:
213:
208:
202:
197:
191:
186:
129:
126:
123:
120:
119:
86:
72:
40:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
953:
951:
943:
942:
937:
932:
927:
922:
917:
912:
907:
902:
897:
892:
887:
882:
877:
867:
866:
863:
862:
861:
860:
834:
797:
796:
793:
786:
771:
759:
756:
754:
753:
743:
742:
741:
724:
723:
722:
721:
720:
719:
718:
704:RandomCanadian
681:
657:RandomCanadian
636:RandomCanadian
620:
594:
563:
561:
536:
535:
521:requested move
515:
513:
510:
507:
506:
503:
502:
499:
498:
495:Low-importance
486:
485:
469:
459:
458:
451:Low-importance
447:
441:
440:
438:
422:
421:
416:
411:
406:
399:
397:Template Usage
393:
381:
380:
364:
352:
351:
349:Low‑importance
337:
325:
324:
321:
320:
317:
316:
311:
301:
300:
295:
285:
284:
279:
269:
268:
266:
264:
258:
257:
249:
248:
245:
244:
242:
240:
239:
238:
227:
216:
205:
194:
180:
179:
177:
164:
154:
153:
142:
136:
135:
133:
102:
90:
89:
67:
55:
54:
48:
37:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
952:
941:
938:
936:
933:
931:
928:
926:
923:
921:
918:
916:
913:
911:
908:
906:
903:
901:
898:
896:
893:
891:
888:
886:
883:
881:
878:
876:
873:
872:
870:
859:
855:
851:
847:
843:
842:
841:
837:
833:
829:
825:
819:
814:
813:
812:
811:
807:
803:
794:
791:
787:
784:
780:
776:
772:
769:
765:
764:
763:
757:
752:
750:
745:
744:
740:
736:
732:
728:
725:
717:
713:
709:
705:
701:
695:
690:
689:
688:
684:
680:
676:
672:
671:
670:
666:
662:
658:
654:
651:
650:
649:
645:
641:
637:
633:
630:). Note that
629:
624:
621:
619:
615:
611:
607:
604:
603:
602:
601:
597:
593:
588:
584:
580:
576:
571:
566:
560:
559:
555:
551:
546:
541:
534:
532:
527:
522:
517:
516:
511:
496:
493:(assessed as
492:
491:
483:
472:
465:
461:
460:
456:
452:
446:
443:
442:
439:
426:United States
420:
417:
415:
412:
410:
407:
405:
404:
400:
398:
395:
394:
391:
387:
386:
378:
367:
365:
362:
358:
357:
353:
346:
341:
340:United States
338:
335:
331:
315:
307:
303:
302:
299:
291:
287:
286:
283:
275:
271:
270:
267:
265:
260:
259:
254:
250:
243:
241:
236:criterion met
228:
225:criterion met
217:
214:criterion met
206:
203:criterion met
195:
192:criterion met
184:
183:
182:
181:
178:
175:
174:
168:
165:
160:
156:
155:
151:
150:quality scale
147:
141:
138:
137:
134:
117:
113:
109:
108:
103:
100:
96:
95:
91:
84:
80:
79:United States
76:
75:North America
71:
68:
65:
61:
56:
52:
46:
38:
29:
28:
19:
850:Peacemaker67
818:Peacemaker67
802:Peacemaker67
798:
761:
748:
746:
731:Peacemaker67
726:
652:
622:
605:
582:
578:
574:
562:
539:
537:
525:
518:
488:
450:
414:Project Talk
402:
383:
171:
145:
105:
51:WikiProjects
550:TribunalMan
540:page moved.
531:move review
345:Mississippi
212:Structure:
869:Categories
758:Quick look
41:List-class
610:Nigel Ish
832:Hog Farm
712:contribs
694:Hog Farm
679:Hog Farm
675:WP:UNDUE
665:contribs
644:contribs
592:Hog Farm
173:criteria
146:BL-class
87:BL‑class
727:Support
653:Comment
623:Support
606:Support
579:Faction
453:on the
583:Battle
575:Battle
419:Alerts
47:scale.
836:Talk
708:talk
683:Talk
661:talk
640:talk
614:talk
596:Talk
554:talk
714:)
667:)
646:)
445:Low
871::
856:)
808:)
737:)
710:/
663:/
642:/
616:)
567:→
556:)
523:.
497:).
343::
262:/
140:BL
81:/
77:/
73::
852:(
820::
816:@
804:(
733:(
706:(
696::
692:@
659:(
638:(
612:(
552:(
547:)
543:(
457:.
152:.
118:.
53::
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
