Knowledge (XXG)

Talk:Razakars (Hyderabad)

Source đź“ť

590: 71: 558: 53: 295: 319: 574: 81: 443: 271: 343: 193: 151: 179: 22: 203: 515: 504: 493: 482: 401: 369: 740: 471: 1156:
is about the Nizam's inclination. Existing article says the Nizam neither wanted to join India nor Pakistan. My edit shows his Inclination towards Pakistan. Please note that I have not deleted the existing information. It is well known that Nizam abstained from joining any of the two countries in the
1069:
implies that since the information comes from the first person directly involved in the circumstance, it needs to be avoided as per the principle of WP:PRIMARY. Alright, fair enough. This can be resolved by citations and references to other secondary or tertiary sources, if possible. I hope we can
1183:
authored by Claude Emerson Welch published almost 30 years ago by State University Press of New York. The edit was to show that the Razakars were active in erstwhile state of Hyderabad but the present area is now segregated into states of Karnataka and Maharashtra as well. This edit warrants a
891:
The Hindu Razakars bit can be reliably sourced but it is quite a misnomer. Some Hindu landlords etc. did send their men (almost insignificant; notwithstanding compulsion) with Nizam's forces to suppress revolts; they hoped to curry favors with such a stance. In later stages, as the tide turned
909:, please stop restoring this. You need to achieve consensus first, almost none of the sources you used are reliable in this context and half of them don't even support the epithet Razakar. Not everyone who fought was a Razakar, the term is specific to the MIM paramilitary organised by Razvi. 1111:
cites a book titled "Constitutional Development and National Movement in India" which I am sure does not violate the WP:PRIMARY principle. Author RC Agarwal is prominent in the field of law & polity. The article already contains the information that
597: 387: 648:
This article is a complete lie, Razakars were worse then nazis and were no way the victims. This article needs to be rewritten by using neutral publications(many western new outlets have the story). Article has now been corrected.
581: 383: 565: 379: 1264:
throws light on the reasons why Nizam was asked to disband the Razakars. It mentions the proverbial final straw that broke camel's back. This too, with all the proper citation! But you felt that the edit needs to be reverted?
670:
Agreed. Even someone with as minimal awareness of this area of history as me can tell that it is written in a very biased tone. Furthermore, there are no citations at all. Someone familiar with this area should enlighten us!
865:. In addition to the newspaper history issue already discussed above, you are also enlarging the scope of the page by using new definitions of the subject of this page. You cannot do that without discussing and achieving 1413:
Doesn't this article need an "Atrocities" section as a main component ? It is a known fact Massive atrocities were perpetrated by the Razakars on the general populace especially Hindus. Sources are easily available.
713:
This article is 100% far from facts. Even the statistics is wrong. Read the book from the link, for more information . The information presented about Razakars in this article is well beyond a pool of absolute lies.
1390:
Then you used an S. Chand book that is supposed to be preparatory book for competitive exams. No citations. No reviews. Not scholarly at all. Why aren't you using the solid sources already listed in Bibliography?
1092:
were minor. Wikilinks were added to the terms which redirects to the entire article page on the subject. This helps broadening the horizons of reader. Anything wrong in that? Still, these too, were reverted.
1238:
qualifies for WP:PRIMARY and WP:UNDUE. What Razakars did in the 1940s is mentioned in this edit sourced from a book authored by Frank Moraes first published in 1959. How is that a problem? Dear
1497: 1562: 1387:
has always been rejected as RS on this page. See, e.g., the section immediately above. He was a politician, activist and rebel. His views cannot be reproduced in Knowledge (XXG) voice.
1216:
After a several edits and addition of new information, it was felt that the added content needs to be re-organized in order to improve the article. This was what I did in minor edit
1557: 1517: 1477: 1202:
cites to a book which says there were frequent reports of atrocities published in dailies & periodicals during Nizam rule. Why was this properly sourced information reverted?
787:"In fact the Andhra communist Razakars who were struggling against the Nizam were looters. In addition to this, there were Congress Razakars too, who looted Umri Bank. reference: 1552: 456: 413: 1542: 1442: 966:
piece), though there are scholarly sources in the article as well so I suppose second tag can be omitted. I'll admit I only made a cursory glance at the rest of the article.
127: 133: 1547: 1462: 1301:
showed the kind of aspirations Razakars had and the extent of their views. The source here is again same as edit 13. Please explain how it be included in a better way.
1537: 1035:
Undoing the revert will not be as per civility. It won't be done right away, in this very instance. I would like to have a discussion so that things get more clear.
442: 1323:
are clearly cited from an independent secondary source same as described previously. It is historic fact with no opposing views. How does this qualify for a revert?
962:, the verification tag should be present since most of the text lacks inline citations and the article still uses a lot of news sources (the worse example being the 1492: 309: 722:
This language is far too emotive which means it doesn't sound impartial. It needs to be rewritten and sourced or if it's from a book, use a direct quotation. --
1447: 784:"Captain L. Pandu Ranga Reddy while addressing the function said that a particular community is being targeted in the name of Razakar which is not appropriate. 1502: 103: 1512: 1472: 333: 285: 1532: 408: 374: 261: 1487: 1437: 1522: 1482: 1394:
If you want to do a major expansion of the article, you need to do it one section at a time. And do it slowly enough that we can review them. --
304: 165: 94: 58: 1457: 589: 251: 629: 417: 1021:
It appears that the bulk revert was done without going into the merits of each edit. 20 reverts all at once? all reverts with same reasons?
806: 1527: 1507: 1467: 1161:
authored by Pakistani nationals. This in no way violates WP:PRIMARY or WP:UNDUE. I am wondering how erroneously the edit was reverted?
699: 678: 328: 280: 169: 161: 656: 1157:
beginning. However it is also a fact that Nizam was conspiring with Pakistan. Interestingly, my citation is a reliable book titled
1452: 33: 1283:
was removal of the reliable source tag. Your reason of WP:PRIMARY is understandable. There is no difference of opinion now.
226: 216: 156: 622:
WHICH COMMUNAL PERSON WROTE THIS ARTICLE? how could such communal articles survive so long in wikipedia? I am shocked.
876:
uses "Congress razakar" does not mean anything. He is the leader of a rival party, hardly a reliable source. --
976: 919: 802: 633: 39: 1419: 1257: 1062: 959: 703: 412:. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a 794: 788: 695: 674: 660: 652: 625: 897: 682: 866: 798: 1415: 102:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
86: 1256:
Existing article mentions that the Nizam was asked to disband the Razakars which he did not and hence
21: 1399: 1372: 1354: 1328: 1306: 1288: 1270: 1247: 1225: 1207: 1189: 1166: 1143: 1125: 1098: 1075: 1065:, who participated in the rebellion against the atrocities by Razakars under Nizam rule. My friend 1040: 1026: 1011: 968: 949: 911: 881: 823: 752: 727: 1138:
was to harmonize the terms Kasim and Qasim. Edit summary is self evident. Anything wrong in this?
815: 718:"Thousands went to jail and braved the cruelties perpetuated by the oppressive administration." 893: 557: 70: 52: 294: 1395: 1368: 1350: 1324: 1302: 1284: 1266: 1243: 1239: 1221: 1203: 1185: 1162: 1139: 1121: 1094: 1071: 1066: 1036: 1022: 1007: 1003: 945: 937: 906: 877: 858: 819: 748: 723: 99: 318: 1431: 1384: 873: 208: 998:
New info is added with references from Books and other sources. However all the
1423: 1403: 1376: 1358: 1332: 1310: 1292: 1274: 1251: 1229: 1211: 1193: 1170: 1147: 1129: 1102: 1079: 1044: 1030: 1015: 985: 953: 928: 901: 885: 827: 756: 731: 707: 686: 664: 637: 573: 848: 270: 198: 76: 1006:
stating two reasons - WP:UNDUE & WP:PRIMARY. This needs to be discussed.
747:. It was a direct quotation, but I agree it is too emotive. I revised it. -- 833:
This is from the mouth of the famous Captain L. Pandhu Ranga Reddy himself
892:
against Nizam/Rizvi, they were nonexistent. I have no idea about the rest.
342: 192: 150: 789:
http://www.ummid.com/news/2014/February/04.02.2014/seminar-on-nizam.html
1349:. The citation is a secondary source. Any rationale behind the revert? 1120:. Edit summary clearly mentions. Any valid reason to revert this edit? 178: 1198:
The acts of violence committed by the Razakars were no secrets. Edit
872:
Your citation for Kane, p.77 did not produce anything. The fact that
224:-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the 400: 368: 221: 15: 588: 572: 556: 441: 341: 317: 293: 269: 940:, can you explain the reasons for the two tags you have 818:, especially not community newspapers like this one. -- 1364: 1338: 1320: 1316: 1298: 1280: 1261: 1235: 1217: 1199: 1176: 1153: 1135: 1108: 1089: 1085: 1058: 1054: 1050: 999: 941: 862: 220:, which aims to improve Knowledge (XXG)'s coverage of 454:
This article has been checked against the following
98:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 1367:missed the citation of a source. It will be added. 994:
Why are edits with proper citations being reverted?
539: 453: 132:This article has not yet received a rating on the 1498:C-Class Indian history articles of Mid-importance 1563:South Asian military history task force articles 1116:. My edit throws light on the logic that led to 1558:C-Class South Asian military history articles 1518:C-Class Hyderabad articles of High-importance 1478:C-Class Telangana articles of High-importance 692:Biased article.. Needs a neutral re-write.. 8: 781:1 more... just gathering online references. 426:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Military history 1553:Indian military history task force articles 1114:finally the standstill agreement was signed 849:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NZCK5R0sBNE 1543:Asian military history task force articles 1443:Unknown-importance British Empire articles 792: 536: 450: 363: 145: 112:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject British Empire 47: 1548:C-Class Indian military history articles 1463:C-Class India articles of Low-importance 1118:finally signing the standstill agreement 406:This article is within the scope of the 1538:C-Class Asian military history articles 841: 598:South Asian military history task force 365: 147: 49: 19: 1493:Mid-importance Indian history articles 416:. To use this banner, please see the 1061:were sourced from a Book authored by 429:Template:WikiProject Military history 7: 1448:All WikiProject British Empire pages 214:This article is within the scope of 92:This article is within the scope of 1503:WikiProject Indian history articles 115:Template:WikiProject British Empire 38:It is of interest to the following 1513:High-importance Hyderabad articles 1473:High-importance Telangana articles 582:Indian military history task force 350:This article was last assessed in 14: 1533:C-Class military history articles 1159:Pakistan's Defence Policy 1947-58 566:Asian military history task force 236:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject India 738: 513: 502: 491: 480: 469: 399: 367: 201: 191: 177: 149: 79: 69: 51: 20: 1488:C-Class Indian history articles 1438:C-Class British Empire articles 1242:I would like to know from you. 256:This article has been rated as 1523:WikiProject Hyderabad articles 1483:WikiProject Telangana articles 828:11:17, 22 September 2018 (UTC) 1: 1458:Low-importance India articles 986:17:35, 29 December 2021 (UTC) 954:22:12, 28 December 2021 (UTC) 929:21:07, 28 December 2021 (UTC) 902:21:18, 26 December 2021 (UTC) 886:23:31, 25 December 2021 (UTC) 326:This article is supported by 302:This article is supported by 278:This article is supported by 106:and see a list of open tasks. 1347:paramilitary volunteer force 816:reliable sources for history 409:Military history WikiProject 305:the Indian history workgroup 1579: 1528:WikiProject India articles 1508:C-Class Hyderabad articles 1468:C-Class Telangana articles 1260:was carried out. The edit 638:15:00, 24 April 2011 (UTC) 474:Referencing and citation: 262:project's importance scale 239:Template:WikiProject India 134:project's importance scale 95:WikiProject British Empire 1424:16:20, 7 April 2023 (UTC) 757:22:24, 1 April 2018 (UTC) 732:20:13, 1 April 2018 (UTC) 708:00:53, 30 June 2011 (UTC) 596: 580: 564: 535: 432:military history articles 394: 349: 325: 301: 277: 255: 186: 131: 64: 46: 1404:09:31, 7 July 2022 (UTC) 1377:04:11, 7 July 2022 (UTC) 1359:04:10, 7 July 2022 (UTC) 1333:04:06, 7 July 2022 (UTC) 1311:04:06, 7 July 2022 (UTC) 1293:04:05, 7 July 2022 (UTC) 1275:04:05, 7 July 2022 (UTC) 1252:04:04, 7 July 2022 (UTC) 1230:04:03, 7 July 2022 (UTC) 1212:04:02, 7 July 2022 (UTC) 1194:04:01, 7 July 2022 (UTC) 1171:04:00, 7 July 2022 (UTC) 1148:03:58, 7 July 2022 (UTC) 1130:03:56, 7 July 2022 (UTC) 1103:03:55, 7 July 2022 (UTC) 1080:03:54, 7 July 2022 (UTC) 1045:03:52, 7 July 2022 (UTC) 1031:03:47, 7 July 2022 (UTC) 1016:03:43, 7 July 2022 (UTC) 687:15:46, 27 May 2011 (UTC) 861:, I have reverted your 665:04:21, 1 May 2011 (UTC) 540:Associated task forces: 485:Coverage and accuracy: 118:British Empire articles 1453:C-Class India articles 958:By the way, regarding 869:to expand the scope. 593: 577: 561: 518:Supporting materials: 446: 346: 322: 298: 274: 28:This article is rated 1070:move ahead this way. 592: 576: 560: 445: 345: 329:WikiProject Hyderabad 321: 297: 281:WikiProject Telangana 273: 87:British Empire portal 32:on Knowledge (XXG)'s 1181:Anatomy of Rebellion 1179:cites a book titled 1000:edits were reverted 814:Newspapers are not 507:Grammar and style: 460:for B-class status: 774:Communist razakars 594: 578: 562: 447: 414:list of open tasks 347: 323: 299: 275: 34:content assessment 810: 797:comment added by 777:Congress razakars 763:Types of Razakars 698:comment added by 677:comment added by 655:comment added by 628:comment added by 615: 614: 611: 610: 607: 606: 603: 602: 531: 530: 476:criterion not met 418:full instructions 362: 361: 358: 357: 217:WikiProject India 144: 143: 140: 139: 1570: 984: 981: 973: 944:to the lead? -- 927: 924: 916: 851: 846: 746: 742: 741: 710: 689: 667: 640: 547: 537: 521: 517: 516: 510: 506: 505: 499: 495: 494: 488: 484: 483: 477: 473: 472: 451: 434: 433: 430: 427: 424: 423:Military history 403: 396: 395: 390: 375:Military history 371: 364: 244: 243: 240: 237: 234: 211: 206: 205: 204: 195: 188: 187: 182: 181: 180: 175: 172: 153: 146: 120: 119: 116: 113: 110: 89: 84: 83: 82: 73: 66: 65: 55: 48: 31: 25: 24: 16: 1578: 1577: 1573: 1572: 1571: 1569: 1568: 1567: 1428: 1427: 1411: 1234:In no way edit 996: 983: 977: 969: 967: 926: 920: 912: 910: 856: 855: 854: 847: 843: 771:Muslim razakars 765: 739: 737: 720: 693: 672: 650: 646: 630:122.173.182.227 623: 620: 545: 519: 514: 508: 503: 497: 492: 486: 481: 475: 470: 431: 428: 425: 422: 421: 377: 334:High-importance 286:High-importance 241: 238: 235: 232: 231: 207: 202: 200: 176: 173: 159: 117: 114: 111: 108: 107: 85: 80: 78: 29: 12: 11: 5: 1576: 1574: 1566: 1565: 1560: 1555: 1550: 1545: 1540: 1535: 1530: 1525: 1520: 1515: 1510: 1505: 1500: 1495: 1490: 1485: 1480: 1475: 1470: 1465: 1460: 1455: 1450: 1445: 1440: 1430: 1429: 1410: 1407: 1382: 1381: 1380: 1379: 1361: 1341:uses the word 1335: 1313: 1295: 1277: 1258:Operation Polo 1254: 1232: 1214: 1196: 1173: 1150: 1132: 1105: 1084:Further edits 1082: 1033: 995: 992: 991: 990: 989: 988: 975: 971:Tayi Arajakate 934: 933: 932: 931: 918: 914:Tayi Arajakate 853: 852: 840: 839: 835: 831: 830: 799:124.123.62.200 779: 778: 775: 772: 769: 768:Hindu razakars 764: 761: 760: 759: 719: 716: 645: 642: 619: 616: 613: 612: 609: 608: 605: 604: 601: 600: 595: 585: 584: 579: 569: 568: 563: 553: 552: 550: 548: 542: 541: 533: 532: 529: 528: 526: 524: 523: 522: 511: 500: 489: 478: 464: 463: 461: 448: 438: 437: 435: 404: 392: 391: 372: 360: 359: 356: 355: 348: 338: 337: 324: 314: 313: 310:Mid-importance 300: 290: 289: 276: 266: 265: 258:Low-importance 254: 248: 247: 245: 242:India articles 213: 212: 196: 184: 183: 174:Low‑importance 154: 142: 141: 138: 137: 130: 124: 123: 121: 109:British Empire 104:the discussion 100:British Empire 91: 90: 74: 62: 61: 59:British Empire 56: 44: 43: 37: 26: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1575: 1564: 1561: 1559: 1556: 1554: 1551: 1549: 1546: 1544: 1541: 1539: 1536: 1534: 1531: 1529: 1526: 1524: 1521: 1519: 1516: 1514: 1511: 1509: 1506: 1504: 1501: 1499: 1496: 1494: 1491: 1489: 1486: 1484: 1481: 1479: 1476: 1474: 1471: 1469: 1466: 1464: 1461: 1459: 1456: 1454: 1451: 1449: 1446: 1444: 1441: 1439: 1436: 1435: 1433: 1426: 1425: 1421: 1417: 1416:SatyaAmarRahe 1408: 1406: 1405: 1401: 1397: 1392: 1388: 1386: 1385:P. Sundarayya 1378: 1374: 1370: 1366: 1362: 1360: 1356: 1352: 1348: 1344: 1340: 1336: 1334: 1330: 1326: 1322: 1318: 1314: 1312: 1308: 1304: 1300: 1296: 1294: 1290: 1286: 1282: 1278: 1276: 1272: 1268: 1263: 1259: 1255: 1253: 1249: 1245: 1241: 1237: 1233: 1231: 1227: 1223: 1219: 1215: 1213: 1209: 1205: 1201: 1197: 1195: 1191: 1187: 1184:revert? How? 1182: 1178: 1174: 1172: 1168: 1164: 1160: 1155: 1151: 1149: 1145: 1141: 1137: 1133: 1131: 1127: 1123: 1119: 1115: 1110: 1106: 1104: 1100: 1096: 1091: 1087: 1083: 1081: 1077: 1073: 1068: 1064: 1060: 1056: 1052: 1048: 1047: 1046: 1042: 1038: 1034: 1032: 1028: 1024: 1020: 1019: 1018: 1017: 1013: 1009: 1005: 1001: 993: 987: 982: 980: 974: 972: 965: 961: 957: 956: 955: 951: 947: 943: 939: 936: 935: 930: 925: 923: 917: 915: 908: 905: 904: 903: 899: 895: 890: 889: 888: 887: 883: 879: 875: 874:P. Sundarayya 870: 868: 864: 860: 850: 845: 842: 838: 834: 829: 825: 821: 817: 813: 812: 811: 808: 804: 800: 796: 790: 785: 782: 776: 773: 770: 767: 766: 762: 758: 754: 750: 745: 736: 735: 734: 733: 729: 725: 717: 715: 711: 709: 705: 701: 697: 690: 688: 684: 680: 676: 668: 666: 662: 658: 654: 643: 641: 639: 635: 631: 627: 617: 599: 591: 587: 586: 583: 575: 571: 570: 567: 559: 555: 554: 551: 549: 544: 543: 538: 534: 527: 525: 520:criterion met 512: 509:criterion met 501: 498:criterion met 490: 487:criterion met 479: 468: 467: 466: 465: 462: 459: 458: 452: 449: 444: 440: 439: 436: 419: 415: 411: 410: 405: 402: 398: 397: 393: 389: 385: 381: 376: 373: 370: 366: 353: 344: 340: 339: 335: 332:(assessed as 331: 330: 320: 316: 315: 311: 308:(assessed as 307: 306: 296: 292: 291: 287: 284:(assessed as 283: 282: 272: 268: 267: 263: 259: 253: 250: 249: 246: 229: 228: 223: 219: 218: 210: 199: 197: 194: 190: 189: 185: 171: 167: 163: 158: 155: 152: 148: 135: 129: 126: 125: 122: 105: 101: 97: 96: 88: 77: 75: 72: 68: 67: 63: 60: 57: 54: 50: 45: 41: 35: 27: 23: 18: 17: 1412: 1393: 1389: 1383: 1346: 1342: 1180: 1158: 1117: 1113: 997: 978: 970: 963: 921: 913: 894:TrangaBellam 871: 867:WP:CONSENSUS 857: 844: 836: 832: 793:— Preceding 786: 783: 780: 743: 721: 712: 700:62.243.85.52 694:— Preceding 691: 679:220.255.2.59 673:— Preceding 669: 647: 621: 455: 407: 352:January 2015 351: 327: 303: 279: 257: 227:project page 225: 215: 209:India portal 93: 40:WikiProjects 1345:instead of 1134:Minor edit 657:99.69.86.74 651:—Preceding 624:—Preceding 496:Structure: 1432:Categories 1409:Atrocities 1063:Sundarayya 837:References 388:South Asia 1396:Kautilya3 1369:Anand2202 1365:last edit 1351:Anand2202 1325:Anand2202 1303:Anand2202 1285:Anand2202 1267:Anand2202 1244:Anand2202 1240:Kautilya3 1222:Anand2202 1204:Anand2202 1186:Anand2202 1163:Anand2202 1140:Anand2202 1122:Anand2202 1095:Anand2202 1072:Anand2202 1067:Kautilya3 1037:Anand2202 1023:Anand2202 1008:Anand2202 1004:Kautilya3 946:Kautilya3 938:Whoisabby 907:Whoisabby 878:Kautilya3 859:Whoisabby 820:Kautilya3 749:Kautilya3 724:Ganpati23 170:Hyderabad 162:Telangana 964:Trunicle 863:addition 807:contribs 795:unsigned 696:unsigned 675:unsigned 653:unsigned 626:unsigned 618:Untitled 457:criteria 1343:militia 644:Sources 260:on the 166:History 30:C-class 1088:& 384:Indian 36:scale. 1337:Edit 1315:Edit 1297:Edit 1279:Edit 1175:Edit 1152:Edit 1107:Edit 1049:Edit 942:added 380:Asian 233:India 222:India 157:India 1420:talk 1400:talk 1373:talk 1363:The 1355:talk 1329:talk 1319:and 1307:talk 1289:talk 1271:talk 1248:talk 1226:talk 1208:talk 1190:talk 1167:talk 1144:talk 1126:talk 1099:talk 1076:talk 1041:talk 1027:talk 1012:talk 979:Talk 960:this 950:talk 922:Talk 898:talk 882:talk 824:talk 803:talk 753:talk 744:Done 728:talk 704:talk 683:talk 661:talk 634:talk 1002:by 791:-- 252:Low 128:??? 1434:: 1422:) 1402:) 1375:) 1357:) 1339:19 1331:) 1321:18 1317:17 1309:) 1299:16 1291:) 1281:15 1273:) 1262:14 1250:) 1236:13 1228:) 1220:. 1218:12 1210:) 1200:11 1192:) 1177:10 1169:) 1146:) 1128:) 1101:) 1078:) 1057:, 1053:, 1043:) 1029:) 1014:) 952:) 900:) 884:) 826:) 809:) 805:• 755:) 730:) 706:) 685:) 663:) 636:) 546:/ 386:/ 382:/ 378:: 336:). 312:). 288:). 168:/ 164:/ 160:: 1418:( 1398:( 1371:( 1353:( 1327:( 1305:( 1287:( 1269:( 1246:( 1224:( 1206:( 1188:( 1165:( 1154:9 1142:( 1136:8 1124:( 1109:6 1097:( 1090:3 1086:2 1074:( 1059:5 1055:4 1051:1 1039:( 1025:( 1010:( 948:( 896:( 880:( 822:( 801:( 751:( 726:( 702:( 681:( 659:( 632:( 420:. 354:. 264:. 230:. 136:. 42::

Index


content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
British Empire
WikiProject icon
British Empire portal
WikiProject British Empire
British Empire
the discussion
???
project's importance scale
WikiProject icon
India
Telangana
History
Hyderabad
WikiProject icon
India portal
WikiProject India
India
project page
Low
project's importance scale
Taskforce icon
WikiProject Telangana
High-importance
Taskforce icon
the Indian history workgroup
Mid-importance

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑