Knowledge (XXG)

Talk:Richard Worth

Source đź“ť

278: 198: 171: 139: 208: 314: 77: 53: 22: 358: 87: 653:
that from a neutral editor. I note that no one has substantially altered the text of the paragraph since, so it appears no one else objects to the new wording. While the edit removed the reference, I suspect that this would be due to unfamiliarity with the Knowledge (XXG) interface rather than bad faith.-
464:
Could I suggest that we take another shot at re-writing the paragraphs to state more clearly that all allegations were unproven? To have several paragraphs outlining the nature of allegations and then one line at the end where it states that no allegation is arguably libellous and would demonstrate a
1147:
I am the subject of this article. There are two issues: 1. The balance of the article relating to allegations against me which are wrong, unfair and damaging. They were withdrawn by the complainant after a high level and extended police investigation and a decision by the police to take no action.
446:
It seems unfair that unproven allegations are reported in significant depth but that the allegations were withdrawn or not proven. If the allegations are not to be removed because they were widely reported, there should be sufficient commentary on how the allegations were withdrawn and or unproven.
405:
Upon reading this article it was clear that a number of allegations that were initially made relating to Worth's resignation have since either been withdrawn or were unproven. While it is clear that Worth lost the confidence of the Prime Minister, it would probably be unfair to have the full history
652:
I don't think banning is warranted. One edit was adding useful information to the article. The other was something I would have preferred he make a request on this talk page about, since it involved a paragraph critical of him. I don't think the rewording was objectionable and I would have accepted
1167:
Accuracy: I consider that almost every fact in this article is accurate - that is, it is backed up by independent, reliable sources. There are four sentences for which I did not find sources: these are now marked as "citation needed". One sentence is marked as "better source needed" as the current
430:
These allegations were widely reported in the news media, and are clearly highly relevant. We need to be careful to report them in the same terms as the media used. The article appears to be relatively restrained in which allegations are reported. I see you added that Worth denied the allegations.
1178:
Coverage after Parliament: I searched a number of media sources but could not much coverage of activity after Parliament. As such there is little I can add to this section. However, if you are aware of any secondary coverage (ie information not put out by the subject or those associated with the
829:
Dr Worth fiddled his own Knowledge (XXG) entry—this is interesting—was caught, and was told off by Knowledge (XXG). That was done instead of doing proper housework, like going to the Brookers website for the nation’s law directory and correcting his own entry, which even today says Dr Worth is a
501:
I suggest you add a sentence or two giving Worth's explanation, but you must not make claims he did not himself make (that were reported in a reliable source). You cannot therefore say as you have done above that Worth denied the allegations, according to the Herald article of 3 July he 'denied
847:
I think the incident is too minor to be added to the article. TV3 news last night gave a list of his previous misdeeds which included the camel riding incident in Egypt when he should have been attending a war memorial service, and the visit he made to a victim in hospital, neither of which we
487:
Worth denied committing any crime, but the article does not suggest he committed a crime, only that the police were investigating an allegation. For the police to investigate does suggest to me that some crime was alleged, but I am not sure what crime this might be. The subject of the police
767:
I'd like to propose adding this new section to the article. I've used Hansard rather than theyworkforyou links, because Hansard is more authoritative (I believe). I've not made the addition myself, since as the discoverer of the COI, I could be seen to have a COI myself.
1171:
Fairness: It is my personal opinion that the article as it stands fairly represents the events of 2009, at least as they are known to the public. I have reworded the Resignation section substantially and the last paragraph makes it clear how all allegations
409:
Since Worth has left Parliament and no longer is a MP, it would also seem that the event is no longer current, so it would be important to remove any "events in play" that have since subsequently become old news and/or unproven.
1218: 153: 1213: 488:
investigation appears to have been a "sexual encounter" in a hotel room. The sources do not say what in this may have been a crime, and the article does not say what the investigation was about.
148: 63: 818:
Why did the Minister tamper with his own Knowledge (XXG) entry earlier this week, and does he intend to take the advice Knowledge (XXG) gave him yesterday afternoon that he should consult
1248: 292: 1223: 1258: 942: 729: 1089: 1085: 1071: 268: 1243: 893:
I agree with gadfium - it is too minor to be included. More notable stuff should be included first. Also, it smacks a little bit of blowing our own trumpet. --
848:
currently mention, but it didn't include editing his Knowledge (XXG) article. Also, we shouldn't make the article simply a list of mistakes he might have made.-
287: 181: 1238: 258: 1164:
Hi Richard. Following your comments I have reviewed the article in its entirety. I have made some amendments to the article, and I'll comment on them here.
709: 105: 1253: 234: 1148:
2. Although the article was reviewed in March 2020 by an editor it is not up to date with my post Parliamentary career. How is that best resolved?
1228: 109: 564:
I've uploaded an Image of Richard Worth to WikiMedia, but can't work out how to have it appear as an embedded image in this page. The Image is:
1233: 221: 176: 743: 104:, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Knowledge (XXG)'s articles about people. All interested editors are invited to 1208: 1149: 1043: 1033: 953: 943:
http://www.parliament.nz/en-NZ/PB/Debates/Debates/9/a/d/49HansD_20090402_00000119-Questions-for-Oral-Answer-Questions-to-Ministers.htm
113: 100: 58: 1067:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
819: 608: 1175:
Damage: It's my intention that if I have achieved accuracy and fairness then readers will have a true picture of the public facts.
1184:
I hope this satisfies your queries. I of course invite other editors to similarly review the article for accuracy and fairness.
452: 33: 448: 331: 710:
http://www.parliament.nz/en-NZ/PB/Debates/QOA/6/2/3/49HansQ_20090402_00000243-5-Internal-Affairs-Minister-Ministerial.htm
607:
The first of these has effectively been undone already, but I'm about to rewrite the second, since they appear to breach
1132: 931: 322: 682:
As an aside one would hope that our elected officials would have better things to do ... like running the country!
778: 672: 612: 1088:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
807: 39: 1153: 920: 543: 470: 420: 335: 1123: 1011: 898: 803: 383: 1168:
source is not an independent one. The article also has some additional material I uncovered in my research.
277: 1007: 880: 718: 622: 589: 339: 1189: 1107:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
1095: 539: 466: 416: 233:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1010:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit 538:
Ah - I see what you mean. I will make a couple of changes accordingly, and see how other editors feel.
744:
http://theyworkforyou.co.nz/portfolios/internal_affairs/2009/apr/02/ministerial_requirements#labour_12
431:
Please provide a source for this, so we can be clear on exactly which allegations he was reacting to.-
985: 406:
of unproven allegations remain as a feature of the article, due to its potentially libellous nature.
230: 1044:
https://web.archive.org/web/20090209054013/http://2008.electionresults.govt.nz/e9/html/e9_part4.html
1034:
https://web.archive.org/web/20090421040845/http://2005.electionresults.govt.nz/e9/html/e9_part4.html
954:
http://www.parliament.nz/en-NZ/PB/Debates/Debates/0/e/b/49HansD_20090408_00001158-General-Debate.htm
21: 391: 1055: 1021: 894: 872: 750: 213: 1092:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
1108: 876: 864: 849: 732: 714: 687: 654: 639: 618: 572: 516: 432: 390:
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
875:, and that seems to be a much better way of handling this (and keeping it on the talk page). 1185: 1061: 1047: 1037: 1027: 831: 502:
committing any crime and said "my conscience is clear"'. I trust you can see the difference.
370: 92: 1115: 453:
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz-national-party/news/article.cfm?o_id=266&objectid=10577946
981: 602:
http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Richard_Worth&diff=257418875&oldid=257229387
597:
http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Richard_Worth&diff=280739020&oldid=280707924
413:
I look forward to responses on the changes, which are hopefully considered more neutral.
565: 1074:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by 787:
which removed a reference which showed Worth in a partially negative light and changed
449:
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/patrick-gower/news/article.cfm?a_id=320&objectid=10582179
1114:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
1081: 973: 138: 1202: 1003: 977: 746: 932:
http://www.stuff.co.nz/dominion-post/news/politics/2310895/More-Indian-heat-on-Worth
810: 683: 635: 197: 170: 969: 664:
Just a note that these edits have now been picked up by the Media. In this case
226: 76: 52: 1080:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than 668: 313: 203: 82: 839:
In neither debate was there a clear denial or admission that the user of the
665: 921:
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10564948
447:
The 3 July Herald article makes clear that Worth denied the allegations
378:
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
1193: 1157: 1137: 989: 902: 884: 854: 754: 737: 722: 691: 675: 659: 643: 626: 577: 547: 521: 474: 437: 424: 455:, where he denied doing anything wrong and denied committing a crime. 1179:
subject), I'd recommend that you include it here on this talk page.
968:
The subject's post nominal letters were shown as OBE VRD KStJ. The
566:
http://commons.wikimedia.org/File:Richard_Worth,_New_Zealand_MP.jpg
112:. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the 702:
These matters were discussed in the house. This link is to the
352: 308: 15: 276: 137: 1219:
Low-importance biography (politics and government) articles
1014:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
728:
The above link no longer works. The debate can be seen at
382:] The anchor (#America's Cup and the Prada Cup) has been 1062:
http://cat.lib.rmit.edu.au/vwebv/holdingsInfo?bibId=79039
1048:
http://2008.electionresults.govt.nz/e9/html/e9_part4.html
1038:
http://2005.electionresults.govt.nz/e9/html/e9_part4.html
1028:
http://cat.lib.rmit.edu.au/vwebv/holdingsInfo?bibId=79039
796: 785: 783: 601: 596: 515:
I would like to see other editor's opinions on this.-
1214:
C-Class biography (politics and government) articles
225:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 1084:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors 588:There appear to have been two series of edits by a 793:a perception of a potential conflict of interest. 834:—as he holds the job of a Minister of the Crown! 772:Knowledge (XXG) Conflict of Interest Controversy 336:"Minister quizzed again over ties to India firm" 802:The matter was raised twice in the house under 634:If the user continues I would recommend a ban. 1070:This message was posted before February 2018. 1259:Knowledge (XXG) pages referenced by the press 8: 1249:Low-importance New Zealand politics articles 980:so have changed order to OBE KStJ VRD. ---- 813:, on the 2nd and 8th of April respectively: 592:who appears to be the subject of this page: 1224:Politics and government work group articles 401:Removal of hearsay and unproven allegations 776:On 30 March 2009, someone using the name 165: 47: 1002:I have just modified 2 external links on 913: 799:and the issue received media coverage. 243:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject New Zealand 167: 49: 19: 820:Knowledge (XXG)’s conflict of interest 149:the politics and government work group 1244:C-Class New Zealand politics articles 122:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Biography 7: 611:. The user has been warned on their 609:Knowledge (XXG):Conflict of interest 219:This article is within the scope of 98:This article is within the scope of 1239:Low-importance New Zealand articles 288:the New Zealand politics task force 38:It is of interest to the following 795:On 1 April 2009, these edits were 14: 1006:. Please take a moment to review 323:mentioned by a media organization 1254:WikiProject New Zealand articles 789:a potential conflict of interest 356: 312: 246:Template:WikiProject New Zealand 206: 196: 169: 85: 75: 51: 20: 698:Mention of wikipedia in Hansard 263:This article has been rated as 1229:WikiProject Biography articles 125:Template:WikiProject Biography 1: 1138:22:41, 20 December 2017 (UTC) 571:Added. Thanks for the photo.- 332:New Zealand Press Association 285:This article is supported by 237:and see a list of open tasks. 146:This article is supported by 1234:C-Class New Zealand articles 964:Order of Post Nominal Letter 110:contribute to the discussion 548:02:49, 26 August 2009 (UTC) 522:01:38, 26 August 2009 (UTC) 475:00:42, 26 August 2009 (UTC) 438:23:20, 25 August 2009 (UTC) 425:22:53, 25 August 2009 (UTC) 1275: 1209:C-Class biography articles 1158:02:37, 31 March 2020 (UTC) 1101:(last update: 5 June 2024) 999:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 742:Or an even deeper link at 269:project's importance scale 231:New Zealand-related topics 1194:02:34, 4 April 2020 (UTC) 1143:Review of content request 990:10:55, 12 July 2012 (UTC) 970:New Zealand Order of Wear 903:20:39, 12 June 2009 (UTC) 723:22:33, 2 April 2009 (UTC) 692:07:43, 2 April 2009 (UTC) 676:06:23, 2 April 2009 (UTC) 660:06:07, 2 April 2009 (UTC) 644:05:30, 2 April 2009 (UTC) 627:07:53, 1 April 2009 (UTC) 578:18:38, 8 March 2009 (UTC) 284: 262: 191: 145: 70: 46: 885:20:36, 5 June 2009 (UTC) 855:03:43, 5 June 2009 (UTC) 755:02:36, 4 June 2009 (UTC) 738:01:53, 4 June 2009 (UTC) 995:External links modified 804:parliamentary privilege 222:WikiProject New Zealand 64:Politics and Government 560:Help linking to a file 384:deleted by other users 340:The New Zealand Herald 321:This article has been 281: 142: 28:This article is rated 867:. I've just seen the 782:made a pair of edits 280: 141: 101:WikiProject Biography 32:on Knowledge (XXG)'s 1082:regular verification 590:User:Richard_W_Worth 584:Conflict of interest 249:New Zealand articles 1072:After February 2018 976:is higher than the 843:account was Worth. 1126:InternetArchiveBot 1077:InternetArchiveBot 873:Talk:Sam Lotu-Iiga 282: 214:New Zealand portal 143: 128:biography articles 34:content assessment 1102: 871:template over at 763:Proposed addition 398: 397: 373:in most browsers. 351: 350: 307: 306: 303: 302: 299: 298: 164: 163: 160: 159: 1266: 1136: 1127: 1100: 1099: 1078: 1059: 1025: 956: 951: 945: 940: 934: 929: 923: 918: 852: 832:Simpson Grierson 806:, both times by 735: 657: 575: 519: 435: 392:Reporting errors 360: 359: 353: 343: 334:(3 April 2009). 316: 309: 251: 250: 247: 244: 241: 216: 211: 210: 209: 200: 193: 192: 187: 184: 173: 166: 130: 129: 126: 123: 120: 106:join the project 95: 93:Biography portal 90: 89: 88: 79: 72: 71: 66: 55: 48: 31: 25: 24: 16: 1274: 1273: 1269: 1268: 1267: 1265: 1264: 1263: 1199: 1198: 1145: 1130: 1125: 1093: 1086:have permission 1076: 1053: 1019: 1012:this simple FaQ 997: 966: 961: 960: 959: 952: 948: 941: 937: 930: 926: 919: 915: 850: 841:Richard W Worth 830:consultant for 779:Richard W Worth 774: 765: 733: 700: 655: 586: 573: 562: 517: 433: 403: 394: 376: 375: 374: 357: 347: 346: 330: 326: 248: 245: 242: 239: 238: 212: 207: 205: 185: 179: 127: 124: 121: 118: 117: 91: 86: 84: 61: 29: 12: 11: 5: 1272: 1270: 1262: 1261: 1256: 1251: 1246: 1241: 1236: 1231: 1226: 1221: 1216: 1211: 1201: 1200: 1197: 1196: 1182: 1181: 1180: 1176: 1173: 1169: 1160:Richard Worth 1144: 1141: 1120: 1119: 1112: 1065: 1064: 1050: 1042:Added archive 1040: 1032:Added archive 1030: 996: 993: 965: 962: 958: 957: 946: 935: 924: 912: 911: 907: 906: 905: 890: 889: 888: 887: 858: 857: 837: 836: 825: 824: 773: 770: 764: 761: 760: 759: 758: 757: 699: 696: 695: 694: 680: 679: 678: 649: 648: 647: 646: 605: 604: 599: 585: 582: 581: 580: 561: 558: 557: 556: 555: 554: 553: 552: 551: 550: 529: 528: 527: 526: 525: 524: 508: 507: 506: 505: 504: 503: 494: 493: 492: 491: 490: 489: 480: 479: 478: 477: 459: 458: 457: 456: 441: 440: 402: 399: 396: 395: 389: 388: 387: 371:case-sensitive 365: 364: 363: 361: 349: 348: 345: 344: 327: 320: 319: 317: 305: 304: 301: 300: 297: 296: 293:Low-importance 283: 273: 272: 265:Low-importance 261: 255: 254: 252: 235:the discussion 218: 217: 201: 189: 188: 186:Low‑importance 174: 162: 161: 158: 157: 154:Low-importance 144: 134: 133: 131: 97: 96: 80: 68: 67: 56: 44: 43: 37: 26: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1271: 1260: 1257: 1255: 1252: 1250: 1247: 1245: 1242: 1240: 1237: 1235: 1232: 1230: 1227: 1225: 1222: 1220: 1217: 1215: 1212: 1210: 1207: 1206: 1204: 1195: 1191: 1187: 1183: 1177: 1174: 1170: 1166: 1165: 1163: 1162: 1161: 1159: 1155: 1151: 1150:115.189.93.51 1142: 1140: 1139: 1134: 1129: 1128: 1117: 1113: 1110: 1106: 1105: 1104: 1097: 1091: 1087: 1083: 1079: 1073: 1068: 1063: 1057: 1051: 1049: 1045: 1041: 1039: 1035: 1031: 1029: 1023: 1017: 1016: 1015: 1013: 1009: 1005: 1004:Richard Worth 1000: 994: 992: 991: 987: 983: 982:Karl Stephens 979: 975: 971: 963: 955: 950: 947: 944: 939: 936: 933: 928: 925: 922: 917: 914: 910: 904: 900: 896: 895:Alan Liefting 892: 891: 886: 882: 878: 874: 870: 866: 863:You're right 862: 861: 860: 859: 856: 853: 846: 845: 844: 842: 835: 833: 827: 826: 823: 821: 816: 815: 814: 812: 809: 805: 800: 798: 794: 790: 786: 784: 781: 780: 771: 769: 762: 756: 752: 748: 745: 741: 740: 739: 736: 730: 727: 726: 725: 724: 720: 716: 712: 711: 707: 705: 697: 693: 689: 685: 681: 677: 674: 670: 667: 663: 662: 661: 658: 651: 650: 645: 641: 637: 633: 632: 631: 630: 629: 628: 624: 620: 616: 614: 610: 603: 600: 598: 595: 594: 593: 591: 583: 579: 576: 570: 569: 568: 567: 559: 549: 545: 541: 540:DavidCondonNZ 537: 536: 535: 534: 533: 532: 531: 530: 523: 520: 514: 513: 512: 511: 510: 509: 500: 499: 498: 497: 496: 495: 486: 485: 484: 483: 482: 481: 476: 472: 468: 467:DavidCondonNZ 463: 462: 461: 460: 454: 450: 445: 444: 443: 442: 439: 436: 429: 428: 427: 426: 422: 418: 417:DavidCondonNZ 414: 411: 407: 400: 393: 385: 381: 380: 379: 372: 368: 362: 355: 354: 341: 337: 333: 329: 328: 324: 318: 315: 311: 310: 294: 291:(assessed as 290: 289: 279: 275: 274: 270: 266: 260: 257: 256: 253: 236: 232: 228: 224: 223: 215: 204: 202: 199: 195: 194: 190: 183: 178: 175: 172: 168: 155: 152:(assessed as 151: 150: 140: 136: 135: 132: 115: 114:documentation 111: 107: 103: 102: 94: 83: 81: 78: 74: 73: 69: 65: 60: 57: 54: 50: 45: 41: 35: 27: 23: 18: 17: 1146: 1124: 1121: 1096:source check 1075: 1069: 1066: 1001: 998: 967: 949: 938: 927: 916: 908: 877:Stuartyeates 868: 840: 838: 828: 817: 811:Pete Hodgson 801: 792: 788: 777: 775: 766: 715:Stuartyeates 713: 708: 703: 701: 619:Stuartyeates 617: 606: 587: 563: 415: 412: 408: 404: 377: 369:Anchors are 366: 286: 264: 220: 147: 99: 40:WikiProjects 1186:HenryCrun15 822:guidelines? 704:uncorrected 240:New Zealand 227:New Zealand 177:New Zealand 1203:Categories 1133:Report bug 972:shows the 909:References 1172:resolved. 1116:this tool 1109:this tool 1056:dead link 1022:dead link 706:hansard: 613:talk page 119:Biography 59:Biography 1122:Cheers.— 808:Labour's 747:Lanma726 182:Politics 1060:tag to 1026:tag to 1008:my edit 865:gadfium 851:gadfium 797:noticed 734:gadfium 684:Bactoid 656:gadfium 636:Bactoid 574:gadfium 518:gadfium 434:gadfium 386:before. 267:on the 30:C-class 1052:Added 1018:Added 673:(Talk) 451:, and 36:scale. 869:press 669:Brian 465:POV. 1190:talk 1154:talk 986:talk 974:KStJ 901:) - 899:talk 881:talk 751:talk 719:talk 688:talk 666:tvnz 640:talk 623:talk 544:talk 471:talk 421:talk 367:Tip: 229:and 108:and 1090:RfC 1046:to 1036:to 978:VRD 791:to 615:. 259:Low 1205:: 1192:) 1156:) 1103:. 1098:}} 1094:{{ 1058:}} 1054:{{ 1024:}} 1020:{{ 988:) 883:) 753:) 731:.- 721:) 690:) 671:| 642:) 625:) 546:) 473:) 423:) 338:. 295:). 180:: 156:). 62:: 1188:( 1152:( 1135:) 1131:( 1118:. 1111:. 984:( 897:( 879:( 749:( 717:( 686:( 638:( 621:( 542:( 469:( 419:( 342:. 325:: 271:. 116:. 42::

Index


content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Biography
Politics and Government
WikiProject icon
Biography portal
WikiProject Biography
join the project
contribute to the discussion
documentation
Taskforce icon
the politics and government work group
Low-importance
WikiProject icon
New Zealand
Politics
WikiProject icon
New Zealand portal
WikiProject New Zealand
New Zealand
New Zealand-related topics
the discussion
Low
project's importance scale
Taskforce icon
the New Zealand politics task force
Low-importance
Media mention

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑