Knowledge

Talk:Forbes list of the most valuable football clubs

Source đź“ť

61: 899: 113: 92: 32: 123: 229:
Where has the information in this article come from? Only the over US$ 100m section has a reference, and the data in the link isn't even the same as that written here! We really need to have some references in this article, especially as it is simply a statement of revenues. We can't be using this
441:
I realise that the phrase was simply copy-and-pasted directly from the Forbes page, but can anyone explain how Income can be negative? Income growth could be negative (declining income), income - expenditure can be negative ( loss-making activity), but how can income, the amount of new financial
1030:
The 2 February 2023 source says "Since 2019, the average MLS team’s valuation has climbed 85% to $ 579 million." The top club is at $ 1 billion so it would only have to increase 33% in 9 months to have been below $ 750 million in May 2022. I don't know how accurate the numbers are but it doesn't
407:
Not only that, debt as a percentage of value is also meaningless. It tells us nothing. Look at any successful firm and if you find that debt-equity ratios are never close to zero. Also, what is the value? Is it equity value or something else? It says market value and links to an article about
503:
in UK reporting. If it is ENGVAR, which version should we use? The Forbes source indicates US English, the teams involved point to UK English. Either way, a note that clarifies the differences in accounting vocab seems necessary. The current footnote refers to
453:
Income is increases in economic benefits during the accounting period in the form of inflows or enhancements of assets or decreases of liabilities that result in increases in equity, other than those relating to contributions from equity
201:
This table is wrong! Manchester City are not valued at 383 million, and ranked 20th. Sheikh Mansoor purchased the club in 2008 for ÂŁ360 million, and today is valued at 1.92 Billion, which would rank them 6th. Source - forbes.com
533:
I am quite good at English, but this article isn't very easy to understand. I don't know what "Debt as %of value" or "% change on year" means. My point is that there should be a little better explanation on something here.
277:
Yeah, I'm going to nominate this article for deletion, as there are no sources, and having just read the Deloitte Money List and forbes etc. There don't seem to be any sources which confirm the list, or figures.
240:
It might have been. Newcastle United richer than Juventus and Arsenal, and there is another article on wikipedia which shows of the 20 richest clubs in the world and the information is completely different. See,
825:
In the list of "Current ranking" I think position 1 & 2 are fake (Lincoln city & Millwall) + position 18 was changed into "Some bad football team", I think this should be Newcastle but I'm not sure.
625:
Why are the rankings from previous years not kept in the article? We can have a section for historic data. If there is no good reason against it, I will look through the article's history and add it. --
988: 726:
It seems someone has had their fun with this page... I tried to correct the ranking, and added the link to the references. So if I missed an error, somebody else can easily do a crosscheck. --
422:
it's also linked from "richest clubs", and the header contains the word "richest", when it is clearly a list by "highes value". there should be a major fix or even DELETION of this article.
977: 937: 1045:
Hi. Thanks for that. If you look down the article the other as of dates are by date of edit, so I was aiming to be consistent. Do you have the other dates for previous years, please?
42: 258:
Forbes only provides reference for the top 20 or so, and even then they are not in the right order. The rest of the list may have just been made up. So I have added the template
299:
I have removed the prod tag, not least because no reason is given. Since this list (albeit in a shortened form) can be updated and verified thanks to references such as
735: 989:
https://www.forbes.com/sites/justinbirnbaum/2023/02/02/major-league-soccers-most-valuable-clubs-2023-lafc-is-the-first-billion-dollar-franchise/?sh=34af58ec5324
1106: 978:
https://www.forbes.com/sites/mikeozanian/2022/05/26/the-worlds-most-valuable-soccer-teams-2022-real-madrid-worth-51-billion-back-on-top/?sh=bafc1fe286be
938:
https://www.forbes.com/sites/mikeozanian/2022/05/26/the-worlds-most-valuable-soccer-teams-2022-real-madrid-worth-51-billion-back-on-top/?sh=2262682a286b
1125: 179: 169: 443: 1130: 1120: 1059:
The sources show dates when clicked. Only two of them were earlier months than stated. I have updated the dates but omitted the day of month.
727: 805:
Found what happened: the vandalism was overwriting Real Madrid's name with Chelsea's, not misrepresenting Chelsea's nationality. Now fixed.
959: 958:
Was that supposed to be Barcelona on the first place? Arsenal is listed twice, and the one on the first place is listed as a Spanish club.
860: 392: 218: 1085:
New list just dropped. seems the discrepancy issue is fixed, they added MLS teams to the World list and also expanded it from 20 to 30. @
940: 880: 477: 423: 409: 145: 779: 586: 842: 672: 550: 242: 136: 97: 1027:, but as of dates should be the date of the source, not the date it was added or accessed. I have changed it to 26 May 2022. 923: 746: 612: 72: 302:, the arguments here do not apply, although the cleanup tags remain. I'll work a little on correcting the data though. 128: 853:
Request Protection. Some Newcastle fans tried to edit the article without any notable sources to back up the claim.
566: 300: 1070: 1054: 1040: 1008: 967: 948: 927: 888: 868: 846: 814: 787: 762: 750: 712: 694: 665: 650: 635: 590: 554: 485: 464: 431: 417: 400: 374: 359: 331: 306: 282: 272: 249: 234: 222: 723: 38: 753:. The info has less data, and is a b****r to collate as it stands. Has anyone actually found this tabulated? 731: 963: 864: 396: 214: 884: 481: 427: 413: 944: 783: 1102: 1004: 661: 582: 993:
They show 4 teams valued higher than Aston Villa, yet none of them make the forbes most valuable list???
210: 1066: 1036: 999:
Can someone explain this to me? Why are the MLS teams excluded? is this a most valuable UEFA team list?
838: 546: 78: 919: 578: 442:
asset in an accounting period, possibly be less than zero? I refer you to the definition used by the
1050: 911: 856: 830: 775: 678:
This tag has been here for a while but no comments or discussion on it. So let's get this over with:
600: 574: 538: 388: 269: 246: 206: 141: 31: 810: 800: 758: 517: 460: 370: 1095: 915: 144:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
350:
Is it not true that since QPR's take over by the two F1 guys that they are richer than Chelsea?
385:
This page is false and its refrences should be verfied since everything stated is inaccurate.
1098: 1016: 1000: 657: 355: 1090: 1062: 1032: 834: 608: 496: 17: 1086: 1046: 1021: 806: 796: 754: 708: 690: 646: 631: 513: 456: 366: 985:
This is their valuation of MLS soccer/football teams. from February of the same year.
597:
Thanks for the finding, I have updated the page now. A18919 22:50, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
473:"Operating" income can be negative. I'll refer you to the wikipedia article on on it, 327:
Right, it now uses the Forbes data as a basis. Further citable additions are welcome.
1114: 542: 262: 230:
list to source claims in other articles when the facts here could be just made up! -
685:. While similar, these lists focus on different financial aspects of the teams. -- 351: 567:
http://www.forbes.com/lists/2008/34/biz_soccer08_Soccer-Team-Valuations_Rank.html
604: 328: 303: 279: 231: 365:
A company is not necessarily wealthy just because its major shareholders are.
724:
http://www.forbes.com/lists/2010/34/soccer-10_Soccer-Team-Valuations_Rank.html
571:
Forbes has updated its Richest football club table for 2008 (see above link)
118: 701: 686: 642: 627: 898: 122: 112: 91: 982:
This is from 8 April 2023, they have Aston Villa at $ 750 million.
474: 897: 499:
issue then? I believe that this is what would be referred to as
906: 1096:
https://www.forbes.com/lists/soccer-valuations/?sh=4b3b1583198b
1024:
wrote "As of 8 April 2023" when the source was added that date
700:
Looks like no one cares, so let's remove the tag. No merge. --
54: 26: 795:
I can't find anywhere in the article that suggests they are.
717: 1060: 1028: 1025: 1081:
Forbes: The world's 30 most valuable Soccer Teams 2023
1031:
sound implausible so I wouldn't call it inconsistent.
722:
This is the link to the actual 2010 list and ranking:
140:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 1080: 718:Don't believe (everything you see in) Knowledge... 907:Forbes' chart of the most valuable football clubs 408:walrasian auctions. Nothing is sourced either. 8: 973:Forbes List seems be incredibly inconsistent 772:Didn't know Chelsea were a Spanish team... 854: 86: 60: 58: 875:T romy fc is number one club in the world 475:http://en.wikipedia.org/Operating_income 444:International Accounting Standards Board 88: 751:it is all over a set of photo captions 747:got together their data for this year 7: 134:This article is within the scope of 749:, but rather than publish a table, 77:It is of interest to the following 25: 1126:Low-importance football articles 121: 111: 90: 59: 30: 996:They value LAFC at $ 1 Billion 174:This article has been rated as 37:This article was nominated for 673:Deloitte Football Money League 332:23:33, 17 September 2007 (UTC) 307:23:10, 17 September 2007 (UTC) 283:16:05, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 273:11:50, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 250:11:46, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 243:Deloitte Football Money League 235:23:19, 13 September 2007 (UTC) 223:17:22, 13 September 2016 (UTC) 154:Knowledge:WikiProject Football 41:on 18 May 2008. The result of 1: 1131:WikiProject Football articles 889:15:46, 21 November 2021 (UTC) 713:13:32, 4 September 2009 (UTC) 157:Template:WikiProject Football 148:and see a list of open tasks. 1121:List-Class football articles 928:10:53, 13 January 2022 (UTC) 869:08:16, 10 October 2021 (UTC) 803:) 08:22, 7 August 2011 (UTC) 641:No objections. Job done. -- 360:18:29, 24 January 2008 (UTC) 936:2022 forbes list is posted 129:Association football portal 18:Talk:Richest football clubs 1147: 968:04:29, 16 March 2023 (UTC) 894:Possible chart of interest 815:08:34, 7 August 2011 (UTC) 788:23:38, 6 August 2011 (UTC) 763:10:47, 22 April 2011 (UTC) 736:17:25, 28 April 2010 (UTC) 695:17:22, 7 August 2009 (UTC) 651:16:04, 7 August 2009 (UTC) 501:profitability before taxes 180:project's importance scale 555:17:26, 19 July 2009 (UTC) 486:01:50, 28 June 2008 (UTC) 432:16:26, 16 July 2010 (UTC) 418:02:00, 28 June 2008 (UTC) 401:07:01, 1 March 2008 (UTC) 197:Validity and verification 173: 106: 85: 1107:16:56, 31 May 2023 (UTC) 1071:00:11, 19 May 2023 (UTC) 1055:17:12, 18 May 2023 (UTC) 1041:14:35, 18 May 2023 (UTC) 1009:16:55, 17 May 2023 (UTC) 949:17:51, 6 June 2022 (UTC) 847:10:28, 10 May 2016 (UTC) 666:18:30, 14 May 2022 (UTC) 636:16:53, 28 May 2009 (UTC) 591:17:16, 4 July 2008 (UTC) 465:08:29, 24 May 2008 (UTC) 375:00:06, 18 May 2008 (UTC) 903: 67:This article is rated 901: 745:Forbes has evidently 142:Association football 137:WikiProject Football 904: 73:content assessment 914:comment added by 871: 859:comment added by 850: 833:comment added by 778:comment added by 711: 656:2020 is missing. 616: 603:comment added by 593: 577:comment added by 558: 541:comment added by 403: 391:comment added by 381:Wrong information 226: 209:comment added by 194: 193: 190: 189: 186: 185: 160:football articles 53: 52: 16:(Redirected from 1138: 1020: 930: 849: 827: 790: 707: 598: 572: 557: 535: 386: 268:to the article. 267: 261: 225: 203: 162: 161: 158: 155: 152: 131: 126: 125: 115: 108: 107: 102: 94: 87: 70: 64: 63: 62: 55: 34: 27: 21: 1146: 1145: 1141: 1140: 1139: 1137: 1136: 1135: 1111: 1110: 1083: 1014: 975: 956: 909: 896: 877: 828: 823: 773: 770: 743: 728:109.250.103.247 720: 676: 623: 564: 536: 531: 439: 437:Negative Income 383: 348: 270:The sunder king 265: 259: 247:The sunder king 204: 199: 159: 156: 153: 150: 149: 127: 120: 100: 71:on Knowledge's 68: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 1144: 1142: 1134: 1133: 1128: 1123: 1113: 1112: 1082: 1079: 1078: 1077: 1076: 1075: 1074: 1073: 974: 971: 960:91.123.181.237 955: 952: 933: 895: 892: 876: 873: 861:112.215.153.86 822: 819: 818: 817: 769: 766: 742: 739: 719: 716: 698: 697: 675: 669: 654: 653: 622: 621:Historic data? 619: 618: 617: 563: 560: 530: 527: 526: 525: 524: 523: 522: 521: 472: 470: 469: 468: 467: 438: 435: 406: 393:218.215.167.93 382: 379: 378: 377: 347: 344: 343: 342: 341: 340: 339: 338: 337: 336: 335: 334: 316: 315: 314: 313: 312: 311: 310: 309: 290: 289: 288: 287: 286: 285: 253: 252: 211:Davidgates1960 198: 195: 192: 191: 188: 187: 184: 183: 176:Low-importance 172: 166: 165: 163: 146:the discussion 133: 132: 116: 104: 103: 101:Low‑importance 95: 83: 82: 76: 65: 51: 50: 43:the discussion 35: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1143: 1132: 1129: 1127: 1124: 1122: 1119: 1118: 1116: 1109: 1108: 1104: 1100: 1097: 1093: 1092: 1088: 1072: 1068: 1064: 1061: 1058: 1057: 1056: 1052: 1048: 1044: 1043: 1042: 1038: 1034: 1029: 1026: 1023: 1018: 1013: 1012: 1011: 1010: 1006: 1002: 997: 994: 991: 990: 986: 983: 980: 979: 972: 970: 969: 965: 961: 953: 951: 950: 946: 942: 941:72.224.146.91 939: 934: 931: 929: 925: 921: 917: 913: 908: 900: 893: 891: 890: 886: 882: 881:196.249.97.43 874: 872: 870: 866: 862: 858: 851: 848: 844: 840: 836: 832: 820: 816: 812: 808: 804: 802: 798: 793: 792: 791: 789: 785: 781: 777: 767: 765: 764: 760: 756: 752: 748: 740: 738: 737: 733: 729: 725: 715: 714: 710: 705: 704: 696: 692: 688: 684: 681: 680: 679: 674: 670: 668: 667: 663: 659: 652: 648: 644: 640: 639: 638: 637: 633: 629: 620: 614: 610: 606: 602: 596: 595: 594: 592: 588: 584: 580: 576: 569: 568: 561: 559: 556: 552: 548: 544: 540: 528: 519: 515: 511: 507: 502: 498: 494: 493: 492: 491: 490: 489: 488: 487: 483: 479: 478:78.86.145.114 476: 466: 462: 458: 455: 454:participants. 451: 450: 449: 448: 447: 445: 436: 434: 433: 429: 425: 424:91.15.145.173 420: 419: 415: 411: 410:78.86.145.114 404: 402: 398: 394: 390: 380: 376: 372: 368: 364: 363: 362: 361: 357: 353: 345: 333: 330: 326: 325: 324: 323: 322: 321: 320: 319: 318: 317: 308: 305: 301: 298: 297: 296: 295: 294: 293: 292: 291: 284: 281: 276: 275: 274: 271: 264: 257: 256: 255: 254: 251: 248: 244: 239: 238: 237: 236: 233: 227: 224: 220: 216: 212: 208: 196: 181: 177: 171: 168: 167: 164: 147: 143: 139: 138: 130: 124: 119: 117: 114: 110: 109: 105: 99: 96: 93: 89: 84: 80: 74: 66: 57: 56: 48: 44: 40: 36: 33: 29: 28: 19: 1099:Midgetman433 1094: 1084: 1017:Midgetman433 1001:Midgetman433 998: 995: 992: 987: 984: 981: 976: 957: 935: 932: 910:— Preceding 905: 902:Forbes_chart 878: 855:— Preceding 852: 829:— Preceding 824: 794: 780:178.78.89.38 774:— Preceding 771: 744: 721: 702: 699: 682: 677: 658:InedibleHulk 655: 624: 579:Joshdhaliwal 570: 565: 532: 510:nett revenue 509: 505: 500: 471: 452: 440: 421: 405: 384: 349: 228: 205:— Preceding 200: 175: 135: 79:WikiProjects 46: 1091:PrimeHunter 1063:PrimeHunter 1033:PrimeHunter 835:Smirnoff103 821:Vandalism ? 671:Merge with 599:—Preceding 573:—Preceding 537:—Preceding 529:Explanation 495:Is this an 387:—Preceding 1115:Categories 1087:EPEAviator 1047:EPEAviator 1022:EPEAviator 69:List-class 807:Kevin McE 797:Kevin McE 755:Kevin McE 741:2011 data 514:Kevin McE 457:Kevin McE 367:Kevin McE 924:contribs 912:unsigned 857:unsigned 843:contribs 831:unsigned 776:unsigned 613:contribs 601:unsigned 587:contribs 575:unsigned 551:contribs 543:Therifas 539:unsigned 389:unsigned 219:contribs 207:unsigned 151:Football 98:Football 39:deletion 954:Arsenal 916:Prabago 768:Chelsea 703:P 1 9 9 506:revenue 352:Y2J RKO 178:on the 683:Oppose 605:A18919 562:Update 508:, not 497:ENGVAR 329:Qwghlm 304:Qwghlm 75:scale. 879:2021 1103:talk 1067:talk 1051:talk 1037:talk 1005:talk 964:talk 945:talk 920:talk 885:talk 865:talk 839:talk 811:talk 801:talk 784:talk 759:talk 732:talk 709:TALK 691:talk 687:P199 662:talk 647:talk 643:P199 632:talk 628:P199 609:talk 583:talk 547:talk 518:talk 482:talk 461:talk 428:talk 414:talk 397:talk 371:talk 356:talk 280:Toon 263:Hoax 232:Toon 215:talk 47:keep 45:was 346:QPR 170:Low 1117:: 1105:) 1069:) 1053:) 1039:) 1007:) 966:) 947:) 926:) 922:• 887:) 867:) 845:) 841:• 813:) 786:) 761:) 734:) 706:• 693:) 664:) 649:) 634:) 615:) 611:• 589:) 585:• 553:) 549:• 512:. 484:) 463:) 446:: 430:) 416:) 399:) 373:) 358:) 266:}} 260:{{ 245:. 221:) 217:• 1101:( 1089:@ 1065:( 1049:( 1035:( 1019:: 1015:@ 1003:( 962:( 943:( 918:( 883:( 863:( 837:( 809:( 799:( 782:( 757:( 730:( 689:( 660:( 645:( 630:( 607:( 581:( 545:( 520:) 516:( 480:( 459:( 426:( 412:( 395:( 369:( 354:( 278:- 213:( 182:. 81:: 49:. 20:)

Index

Talk:Richest football clubs
Articles for deletion
deletion
the discussion
content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Football
WikiProject icon
icon
Association football portal
WikiProject Football
Association football
the discussion
Low
project's importance scale
unsigned
Davidgates1960
talk
contribs
17:22, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
Toon
23:19, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
Deloitte Football Money League
The sunder king
11:46, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
Hoax
The sunder king
11:50, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
Toon

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑