Knowledge

Talk:Wayne County, Michigan

Source đź“ť

213: 316: 186: 223: 80: 53: 553:
before the state agency did. It was hired by the state to do work, i think outside its county, because it was capable, while the state agency could not do that work. It stands out in my experience working with NRHP database data as, i think, the only county bridge department having multiple (5 or more) works that are NRHP-listed, while there are numerous state ones. The article can be developed more from the sources given. --
158: 90: 22: 575:
development is called for, but it is expanded already and I think too large to be kept only within the county article. Again to Dough4872 now, the list of bridges is not a list of bridges merely maintained, it is a starter list of works BY the commission; these works are notable enough to be listed on the National Register of Historic Places, which says something. --
497:
is my view. I think having a separate article is good and fine. The proposed merger, if implemented as done by Imzadi1979 before, would lose the list together of works by the department. The material is perhaps too long to be included in the Wayne County article. It is fine in a separate article.
502:
list does probably include all the currently mentioned works, but I can't find them all there. There's too much other stuff. It is impossible there for a reader to navigate among the Road Commission's works. And it is impossible to add other works of the Road Commission to that list. I wouldn't
453:
The Wayne County Road Commission is now the Wayne County Department of Public Services. Instead of being a quasi-independent government agency, it is now integrated into the county governance structure for Wayne County, unlike the other 82 counties in the state. (County road commissions in Michigan
552:
I agree that usually only state-level road agencies are notable enough. This is unusual, it is notable because it is so unusual as a county agency. The sources in the article explain, this county was a leader, it was more advanced than the state agency. It adopted certain bridge technologies
407:
As Phizzy noted three years ago, Redford's coloring is inconsistent with that of the other townships. But whatever fix is implemented, it's going to affect every map for every city and township in the county (except Redford). At the same time, it occurs to me that perhaps the maps for Michigan
574:
P.S. When starting the article, I only knew it was unusual among county depts for the number of NRHP bridges. Consulting the sources, from which I have now added more, I see that the commission was internationally known as a leader, and I think is quite notable on its own. I think further
527:- The commission is small enough of an agency that it can be covered in the main county article. Usually, only state-level road agencies are notable enough for their own articles. The list of bridges maintained by the agency is unneeded, it can be covered in the NRHP list for Wayne County. 454:
are governed by a board of the county road commission. Their members may be elected or appointed, but the county commission/board does not handle the oversight of road functions, just like the sheriff is the elected official responsible for the oversight of the sheriff's department.)
503:
mind the separate article being revised to cover the entire modern department, too, in which case it could properly be renamed. But if the list of works would be dropped, I would oppose that. I oppose "merging" this in, if that would mean the material would be lost. --
499: 459: 457:
In any case, the article in question is very short, and all of the pertinent content is located here except the list of bridges on the National Register of Historic Places, which is properly left to the
698: 637: 462:
article. Notability isn't inherited, and the WCRC article fails to establish the notability of the former agency. The bridges are notable, but that does not make the WCRC itself so.
253: 708: 270: 693: 306: 296: 498:
The list provides readers the means to navigate among the different works, and the article can be developed to include other, non NRHP-listed works. Yes, the
718: 713: 703: 688: 260: 668: 138: 148: 265: 630: 683: 663: 167: 63: 673: 678: 408:
counties should distinguish between incorporated charter townships and unincorporated general law townships, say, with a patterned screen.
351: 325: 236: 196: 191: 114: 388: 248: 540: 412: 103: 58: 244:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
586: 564: 514: 645: 486: 441: 33: 21: 626:
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
641: 424: 392: 445: 604: 612: 485:
Thanks for setting up a merger proposal discussion, after I objected to your previously redirecting the
419:
for an example of how this would look inline; I'm working on the template in my sandbox just for kicks.
416: 39: 470: 411:
On a different subject, I propose that we add a section to either the article itself or the template
384: 228: 535: 315: 113:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
420: 212: 185: 581: 559: 509: 608: 367: 465: 95: 530: 657: 622:
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
241: 79: 52: 576: 554: 504: 649: 616: 591: 569: 547: 519: 479: 428: 396: 371: 363: 218: 157: 85: 240:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the 109: 500:
National Register of Historic Places listings in Wayne County, Michigan
460:
National Register of Historic Places listings in Wayne County, Michigan
605:
http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.waynecounty.com/links_comm.htm
107:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of 403:
Map of county needs rethinking, and listing former civil townships
381:
The list of routes, whereby factual, just seems a bit excessive.
15: 314: 156: 489:
article without any discussion. I restored the article.
415:
listing the former civil townships. See the article on
699:
Start-Class United States articles of Low-importance
607:Links to municipal websites as of the early 2000s 636:Participate in the deletion discussion at the 440:This is section to discuss proposal to merge 348:Wondering how to edit this U.S. County Entry? 8: 19: 362:Redford Charter Township is colored gray. 180: 47: 709:Unknown-importance U.S. counties articles 182: 49: 694:Low-importance United States articles 7: 234:This article is within the scope of 101:This article is within the scope of 281:Knowledge:WikiProject United States 38:It is of interest to the following 719:WikiProject United States articles 714:WikiProject U.S. counties articles 704:Start-Class U.S. counties articles 689:Start-Class United States articles 631:Seal of Wayne County, Michigan.svg 284:Template:WikiProject United States 14: 669:High-importance Michigan articles 221: 211: 184: 88: 78: 51: 20: 413:Template:Wayne County, Michigan 301:This article has been rated as 143:This article has been rated as 123:Knowledge:WikiProject Michigan 1: 684:WikiProject Michigan articles 664:Start-Class Michigan articles 323:This article is supported by 165:This article is supported by 126:Template:WikiProject Michigan 117:and see a list of open tasks. 674:Start-Class Detroit articles 617:18:06, 2 November 2013 (UTC) 592:09:38, 18 October 2012 (UTC) 570:08:58, 18 October 2012 (UTC) 548:03:39, 18 October 2012 (UTC) 520:03:32, 18 October 2012 (UTC) 487:Wayne County Road Commission 480:03:20, 18 October 2012 (UTC) 442:Wayne County Road Commission 434:Wayne County Road Commission 679:Detroit task force articles 735: 650:21:08, 4 August 2021 (UTC) 372:16:01, 22 March 2009 (UTC) 307:project's importance scale 149:project's importance scale 429:06:02, 13 June 2012 (UTC) 397:23:20, 30 July 2011 (UTC) 352:WikiProject U.S. Counties 326:WikiProject U.S. counties 322: 300: 237:WikiProject United States 206: 164: 142: 73: 46: 242:United States of America 600:Old municipal websites 446:Wayne County, Michigan 354:standards might help. 319: 287:United States articles 168:the Detroit task force 161: 28:This article is rated 417:Cook County, Illinois 318: 160: 229:United States portal 104:WikiProject Michigan 255:Articles Requested! 642:Community Tech bot 320: 162: 34:content assessment 387:comment added by 341: 340: 337: 336: 333: 332: 179: 178: 175: 174: 129:Michigan articles 726: 589: 584: 579: 567: 562: 557: 546: 543: 538: 533: 517: 512: 507: 478: 475: 468: 399: 358:Problem with map 289: 288: 285: 282: 279: 231: 226: 225: 224: 215: 208: 207: 202: 199: 188: 181: 131: 130: 127: 124: 121: 98: 93: 92: 91: 82: 75: 74: 69: 66: 55: 48: 31: 25: 24: 16: 734: 733: 729: 728: 727: 725: 724: 723: 654: 653: 638:nomination page 624: 602: 587: 582: 577: 565: 560: 555: 541: 536: 531: 528: 515: 510: 505: 474: 471: 466: 463: 436: 405: 382: 379: 360: 346: 286: 283: 280: 277: 276: 275: 261:Become a Member 227: 222: 220: 200: 194: 145:High-importance 128: 125: 122: 119: 118: 96:Michigan portal 94: 89: 87: 68:High‑importance 67: 61: 32:on Knowledge's 29: 12: 11: 5: 732: 730: 722: 721: 716: 711: 706: 701: 696: 691: 686: 681: 676: 671: 666: 656: 655: 634: 633: 623: 620: 601: 598: 597: 596: 595: 594: 572: 522: 491: 490: 472: 451: 450: 435: 432: 404: 401: 378: 377:Transportation 375: 359: 356: 349: 345: 342: 339: 338: 335: 334: 331: 330: 321: 311: 310: 303:Low-importance 299: 293: 292: 290: 274: 273: 268: 263: 258: 251: 249:Template Usage 245: 233: 232: 216: 204: 203: 201:Low‑importance 189: 177: 176: 173: 172: 163: 153: 152: 141: 135: 134: 132: 115:the discussion 100: 99: 83: 71: 70: 56: 44: 43: 37: 26: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 731: 720: 717: 715: 712: 710: 707: 705: 702: 700: 697: 695: 692: 690: 687: 685: 682: 680: 677: 675: 672: 670: 667: 665: 662: 661: 659: 652: 651: 647: 643: 639: 632: 629: 628: 627: 621: 619: 618: 614: 610: 606: 599: 593: 590: 585: 580: 573: 571: 568: 563: 558: 551: 550: 549: 545: 544: 539: 534: 526: 523: 521: 518: 513: 508: 501: 496: 495:Keep separate 493: 492: 488: 484: 483: 482: 481: 477: 476: 469: 461: 455: 449: 447: 443: 438: 437: 433: 431: 430: 426: 422: 421:LibertyHiller 418: 414: 409: 402: 400: 398: 394: 390: 386: 376: 374: 373: 369: 365: 357: 355: 353: 343: 328: 327: 317: 313: 312: 308: 304: 298: 295: 294: 291: 278:United States 272: 269: 267: 264: 262: 259: 257: 256: 252: 250: 247: 246: 243: 239: 238: 230: 219: 217: 214: 210: 209: 205: 198: 197:U.S. counties 193: 192:United States 190: 187: 183: 170: 169: 159: 155: 154: 150: 146: 140: 137: 136: 133: 116: 112: 111: 106: 105: 97: 86: 84: 81: 77: 76: 72: 65: 60: 57: 54: 50: 45: 41: 35: 27: 23: 18: 17: 635: 625: 603: 529: 524: 494: 464: 456: 452: 439: 410: 406: 389:109.125.9.26 383:— Preceding 380: 361: 347: 324: 302: 266:Project Talk 254: 235: 166: 144: 108: 102: 40:WikiProjects 609:WhisperToMe 467:Imzadi 1979 30:Start-class 658:Categories 448:article. 385:unsigned 344:Untitled 120:Michigan 110:Michigan 59:Michigan 305:on the 147:on the 64:Detroit 364:Phizzy 271:Alerts 36:scale. 532:Dough 525:Merge 444:into 646:talk 613:talk 425:talk 393:talk 368:talk 350:The 139:High 640:. — 583:ncr 561:ncr 511:ncr 297:Low 660:: 648:) 615:) 588:am 578:do 566:am 556:do 542:72 537:48 516:am 506:do 427:) 395:) 370:) 195:: 62:: 644:( 611:( 473:→ 423:( 391:( 366:( 329:. 309:. 171:. 151:. 42::

Index


content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Michigan
Detroit
WikiProject icon
Michigan portal
WikiProject Michigan
Michigan
the discussion
High
project's importance scale
Taskforce icon
the Detroit task force
WikiProject icon
United States
U.S. counties
WikiProject icon
United States portal
WikiProject United States
United States of America
Template Usage
Articles Requested!
Become a Member
Project Talk
Alerts
Low
project's importance scale
Taskforce icon

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑