Knowledge

Talk:Wisconsin Death Trip (film)

Source đź“ť

320: 340: 21: 898: 129: 875: 857: 826: 651: 236: 205: 611:) and lacks thematic organization. Please write this section from scratch, organize reviewers' sentiments, and paraphrase whenever you can but be vigilant to avoid any form of original research. It is equally important that the claim in the lede that the movie received praise for its cinematography and criticism for its structure and inclusion of modern-day footage is substantiated here. See 802: 766: 752: 697: 679: 665: 544: 510: 246: 383: 67: 119: 98: 717:
Another reliable, independent source is needed to support the fact that the movie "was largely met with critical praise". Review aggregation websites such as Rotten Tomatoes cannot be used because prior to the 2000s, the site didn't exist, and review aggregators are not arbiters of critical
933:
Although nominator has fixed some of the issues raised in this GAN, they seem to have abandoned this in favor of pursuing other endeavors. I shall then close this GAN as failed. The article can be renominated at a later period once the remaining issues are fixed.
997: 388: 718:
consensus; sections about critical reception should also benefit from other reliable sources, such as books and periodicals reporting in retrospect how a film was received by critics.
329: 215: 349: 219: 484: 532: 421: 393: 1012: 1007: 460: 1022: 1017: 411: 958:
I intended to come back to this over this coming weekend, but will leave it be for now and reassess at a later time. Thank you for your attention to it. --
992: 849: 187: 177: 771:
Need coverage on the movie's aggregate scores on Rotten Tomatoes and Metacritic included in critical response, preferably as the last paragraph. Use
536: 528: 32: 657: 607:). While we're at it, critical response could benefit from a major copyedit, as it consists mostly of pull quotes from reviews (a violation of 520: 982: 439: 153: 43: 987: 1027: 939: 923: 908: 867: 723: 474: 454: 52: 1002: 304: 863: 643: 524: 788: 480: 416: 264: 142: 103: 38: 776: 671: 935: 919: 904: 719: 450: 276: 268: 78: 918:
The article has passed the "verifiable" criterion, so I'm happy to pass this GAN once the remaining issues are fixed.
272: 259: 210: 516: 772: 633: 758: 744: 435: 84: 319: 963: 689: 685: 618:
Please make sure both terminal and orthographic punctuations on truncated quotes are placed outside (
575:
she builds a home, and stages a series of live performances that are compromised by her false teeth.
66: 612: 608: 339: 152:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
48: 839: 134: 959: 604: 967: 943: 927: 912: 727: 464: 310: 976: 709: 600: 583: 578: 565: 574: 556:
Wisconsin Death Trip is a 1999 docudrama film written and directed by James Marsh
555: 263:. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can 251: 241: 235: 204: 124: 148: 442:. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review. 280: 146:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of 619: 594: 118: 97: 903:
Placing on hold as I review the article against the web sources.
492:
I'll take this. Sorry it has taken you too long for a reviewer.
313:
in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
309:
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the
60: 15: 338: 318: 41:
at the time (December 23, 2022). There are suggestions on
601:
Wisconsin Death Trip was largely met with critical praise
615:
for pointers on how you can write this section better.
998:
Stub-Class articles with conflicting quality ratings
593:
That long quote in Style section must be rendered a
603:must be reliably sourced in its relevant section ( 47:for improving the article. If you can improve it, 843:and other media, where possible and appropriate. 279:. To improve this article, please refer to the 848:(images are tagged and non-free content have 8: 708:Cast section must be reliably sourced, per 562:" since he's given a "screenplay by" credit 566:to claim land she has allegedly inherited" 371: 275:. To use this banner, please refer to the 199: 92: 584:including at an Eau Claire train station 402: 374: 201: 94: 64: 1013:Documentary films task force articles 1008:Stub-Class Documentary films articles 20: 7: 597:since it's made up of 508 characters 440:Talk:Wisconsin Death Trip (film)/GA1 257:This article is within the scope of 140:This article is within the scope of 1023:American cinema task force articles 1018:Stub-Class American cinema articles 83:It is of interest to the following 311:project-independent quality rating 14: 993:Low-importance Wisconsin articles 347:This article is supported by the 327:This article is supported by the 896: 873: 855: 824: 800: 797:Fair representation without bias 764: 750: 695: 677: 663: 649: 542: 508: 273:regional and topical task forces 244: 234: 203: 127: 117: 96: 65: 19: 801: 765: 751: 696: 678: 664: 590:at an Eau Claire train station" 543: 509: 483:for what the criteria are, and 182:This article has been rated as 162:Knowledge:WikiProject Wisconsin 777:Template:Metacritic film prose 505:(prose, spelling, and grammar) 165:Template:WikiProject Wisconsin 1: 968:10:13, 23 December 2022 (UTC) 944:08:42, 23 December 2022 (UTC) 928:05:23, 22 December 2022 (UTC) 913:15:34, 18 December 2022 (UTC) 728:05:11, 19 December 2022 (UTC) 465:15:34, 18 December 2022 (UTC) 156:and see a list of open tasks. 983:Former good article nominees 897: 874: 856: 825: 714:What makes cite 38 reliable? 650: 330:Documentary films task force 33:Media and drama good article 27:Wisconsin Death Trip (film) 1044: 988:C-Class Wisconsin articles 490: 350:American cinema task force 289:Knowledge:WikiProject Film 188:project's importance scale 37:, but it did not meet the 1028:WikiProject Film articles 577:there's no need for that 346: 326: 308: 292:Template:WikiProject Film 229: 181: 112: 91: 1003:Stub-Class film articles 936:Nineteen Ninety-Four guy 920:Nineteen Ninety-Four guy 905:Nineteen Ninety-Four guy 773:Template:Rotten Tomatoes 720:Nineteen Ninety-Four guy 451:Nineteen Ninety-Four guy 850:non-free use rationales 498:reasonably well written 487:for what they are not) 343: 323: 73:This article is rated 837:It is illustrated by 789:neutral point of view 736:broad in its coverage 342: 322: 143:WikiProject Wisconsin 39:good article criteria 558:should be "written 265:join the discussion 29:was nominated as a 821:No edit wars, etc. 629:factually accurate 344: 324: 168:Wisconsin articles 79:content assessment 868:suitable captions 644:reference section 430: 429: 365: 364: 361: 360: 357: 356: 267:and see lists of 198: 197: 194: 193: 59: 58: 51:; it may then be 1035: 900: 899: 877: 876: 859: 858: 828: 827: 804: 803: 768: 767: 754: 753: 699: 698: 681: 680: 667: 666: 658:reliable sources 653: 652: 602: 585: 576: 567: 557: 546: 545: 512: 511: 384:Copyvio detector 372: 297: 296: 293: 290: 287: 260:WikiProject Film 254: 249: 248: 247: 238: 231: 230: 225: 222: 207: 200: 170: 169: 166: 163: 160: 137: 135:Wisconsin portal 132: 131: 130: 121: 114: 113: 108: 100: 93: 76: 70: 69: 61: 23: 22: 16: 1043: 1042: 1038: 1037: 1036: 1034: 1033: 1032: 973: 972: 864:appropriate use 786:It follows the 605:MOS:FILMCRITICS 434:This review is 426: 398: 370: 294: 291: 288: 285: 284: 250: 245: 243: 223: 213: 167: 164: 161: 158: 157: 133: 128: 126: 106: 77:on Knowledge's 74: 44:the review page 12: 11: 5: 1041: 1039: 1031: 1030: 1025: 1020: 1015: 1010: 1005: 1000: 995: 990: 985: 975: 974: 971: 970: 955: 954: 953: 952: 951: 950: 949: 948: 947: 946: 884: 883: 882: 881: 880: 835: 834: 833: 832: 831: 811: 810: 809: 808: 807: 784: 783: 782: 781: 780: 732: 731: 730: 715: 712: 705: 704: 703: 702: 656:(citations to 625: 624: 623: 616: 598: 591: 581: 572: 563: 560:for the screen 552: 551: 550: 549: 489: 488: 469: 445: 444: 428: 427: 425: 424: 419: 414: 408: 405: 404: 400: 399: 397: 396: 394:External links 391: 386: 380: 377: 376: 369: 366: 363: 362: 359: 358: 355: 354: 345: 335: 334: 325: 315: 314: 307: 301: 300: 298: 256: 255: 239: 227: 226: 208: 196: 195: 192: 191: 184:Low-importance 180: 174: 173: 171: 154:the discussion 139: 138: 122: 110: 109: 107:Low‑importance 101: 89: 88: 82: 71: 57: 56: 24: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1040: 1029: 1026: 1024: 1021: 1019: 1016: 1014: 1011: 1009: 1006: 1004: 1001: 999: 996: 994: 991: 989: 986: 984: 981: 980: 978: 969: 965: 961: 957: 956: 945: 941: 937: 932: 931: 930: 929: 925: 921: 916: 915: 914: 910: 906: 902: 901: 894: 891: 890: 888: 885: 879: 878: 871: 869: 865: 853: 851: 845: 844: 842: 841: 836: 830: 829: 822: 819: 818: 816: 812: 806: 805: 798: 795: 794: 792: 790: 785: 778: 774: 770: 769: 762: 760: 748: 746: 745:major aspects 740: 739: 737: 733: 729: 725: 721: 716: 713: 711: 707: 706: 701: 700: 693: 691: 687: 675: 673: 661: 659: 647: 645: 639: 638: 636: 635: 630: 626: 621: 617: 614: 610: 606: 599: 596: 592: 589: 582: 580: 573: 570: 564: 561: 554: 553: 548: 547: 540: 538: 534: 530: 526: 522: 518: 506: 502: 501: 499: 495: 494: 493: 486: 482: 478: 476: 472: 471: 470: 467: 466: 462: 459: 456: 452: 449: 443: 441: 437: 432: 431: 423: 420: 418: 415: 413: 410: 409: 407: 406: 401: 395: 392: 390: 387: 385: 382: 381: 379: 378: 373: 367: 352: 351: 341: 337: 336: 332: 331: 321: 317: 316: 312: 306: 303: 302: 299: 295:film articles 282: 278: 277:documentation 274: 270: 266: 262: 261: 253: 242: 240: 237: 233: 232: 228: 221: 217: 212: 209: 206: 202: 189: 185: 179: 176: 175: 172: 155: 151: 150: 145: 144: 136: 125: 123: 120: 116: 115: 111: 105: 102: 99: 95: 90: 86: 80: 72: 68: 63: 62: 54: 50: 46: 45: 40: 36: 35: 34: 28: 25: 18: 17: 917: 892: 886: 861: 847: 838: 820: 814: 796: 787: 756: 742: 735: 710:MOS:FILMCAST 683: 669: 655: 641: 632: 628: 613:WP:RECEPTION 609:WP:QUOTEFARM 587: 579:Oxford comma 568: 559: 514: 504: 497: 491: 473: 468: 457: 447: 446: 433: 422:Instructions 348: 328: 258: 183: 147: 141: 85:WikiProjects 42: 31: 30: 26: 595:block quote 586:"including 529:word choice 436:transcluded 252:Film portal 216:Documentary 53:renominated 977:Categories 960:Drown Soda 690:plagiarism 634:verifiable 389:Authorship 375:GA toolbox 281:guidelines 269:open tasks 224:Stub‑class 893:Pass/Fail 448:Reviewer: 412:Templates 403:Reviewing 368:GA Review 159:Wisconsin 149:Wisconsin 104:Wisconsin 49:please do 461:contribs 417:Criteria 220:American 887:Overall 759:focused 686:copyvio 533:fiction 186:on the 75:C-class 840:images 815:stable 813:It is 791:policy 734:It is 627:It is 620:MOS:LQ 535:, and 525:layout 496:It is 477:review 81:scale. 866:with 537:lists 479:(see 438:from 964:talk 940:talk 924:talk 909:talk 775:and 724:talk 688:and 631:and 571:land 521:lead 519:for 485:here 481:here 455:talk 305:Stub 286:Film 271:and 211:Film 588:one 517:MoS 178:Low 979:: 966:) 942:) 926:) 911:) 895:: 889:: 872:: 860:b 854:: 846:a 823:: 817:. 799:: 793:. 763:: 755:b 749:: 741:a 738:. 726:) 694:: 682:d 676:: 672:OR 668:c 662:: 654:b 648:: 640:a 637:. 541:: 531:, 527:, 523:, 513:b 507:: 503:a 500:. 475:GA 463:) 218:/ 214:: 962:( 938:( 922:( 907:( 870:) 862:( 852:) 779:. 761:) 757:( 747:) 743:( 722:( 692:) 684:( 674:) 670:( 660:) 646:) 642:( 622:) 569:a 539:) 515:( 458:· 453:( 353:. 333:. 283:. 190:. 87:: 55:.

Index

Media and drama good article
good article criteria
the review page
please do
renominated

content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Wisconsin
WikiProject icon
Wisconsin portal
WikiProject Wisconsin
Wisconsin
the discussion
Low
project's importance scale
WikiProject icon
Film
Documentary
American
WikiProject icon
Film portal
WikiProject Film
join the discussion
open tasks
regional and topical task forces
documentation
guidelines
Stub

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑