Knowledge (XXG)

Talk:Torchic

Source 📝

2522:
article. It gives Knowledge (XXG) a bad image by featuring obscure and narrow articles on the main page. It may be a well-written article and a fine example of what every article on Knowledge (XXG) should be, but the Main Page is not the place for an academic class in good craftmanship. There is only one day more of Pokemon, but may I kindly request that you don't put such articles on the Featured Article portion of the Main Page. Why not find an article of interest and select it for immediate improvement for use on the Main Page? P.S. History of erotic depections was not a good choioce either, as it present another narrow and controversial topic. Perhaps a five-year old would see objectionable material for the previous article, but a college professor trying to see if Knowledge (XXG) is a viable source for information would get peeved (for lack of a better word) at the perceived pointlessness. So it's not a matter of immaturity vs. maturity, it's more of impressions.
2824:
do with it, or it was contoversially erected during some crisis. I could say, "That's historycruft and only history buffs would care about such an inane article." I might be right, but it doesn't matter. Knowledge (XXG) is supposed to be able to provide encyclopedic information on EVERYTHING. As far as losing credibility, if someone is going to make the insanely illogical conclusion that because Torchic is featured, the whole project is bunk, then i don't want to have them here. For the person who said this is a waste of our time and money, i think that those who spent their time working on the article don't feel it wasted, and my donations to wikipedia have covered at least the Torchic page so stop griping. (i'm getting very sick of people who use money arguements for notability) -
2756:
selected are of interest, unique and otherwise probably would not be brought to my attention. The Kengir uprising is a perfect example. To place an item of pop culture (and of a culture that is often ridiculed for its intensity and exemplified for the extent of its fan-base and fancruft that springs up surrounding it) alongside the relatively serious articles otherwise featured -- to name a few, ASCII, Caffeine, and the London underground, is to degrade both Knowledge (XXG) and those topics elsewise listed as "Featured" articles. Granted, there are other videogame and TV references, but they tend not to be as specific or asinine as a single Pokemon.
2782:
previously to see if their arguments have already been answered. What makes it so damn interesting is that some of you are now saying that an article of "Pokemon character" shouldn't make it to the FAs. So please do tell me... who should receive the honor and responsibility to decide which articles should become FAs and which should not? Perhaps a committee of wise and honorable men (women allowed???)? Or how about some admins? Maybe we should ask a couple of the members of the Swedish Academy to do this for us during their spare-time? Or no! Wait! I bluddy got it! How about the man himself;
21: 2888:
seem to have fit better, that creature being the #001 among the group), but that is no reason to prevent it from being featured. If it is a matter of relevance to any of you, then what relevance is the "Definition of Macedonia" (relevant to only about five million people - far less than the number of children under 10 in the United States) or the "History of the Board Game Monopoly"? I recommend that you read the previous poster's link to "notability is not subjective."
2923:
topics that deserve to be featured, and now we have given space twice to something frivolous. Once was perhaps perfectly fine, so I won't argue that something Pokemon related should never get featured, but to do it twice? Why not just have the main article for Pokemon made to fit FA status, if it isn't already, and have that made into a featured article instead of two minor subtopics of it? I feel that perhaps the definition of what qualifies for a FA may need revision.
494: 795: 474: 44: 1490: 1472: 289: 867: 1402: 1412: 1384: 1214: 416: 222: 65: 388: 1201: 426: 338: 320: 2352:: intelligence and mature research has evolved beyond "adult" topics and into general topics about every aspect of life. Even older professors are beginning to notice this shift for the better. I believe the cycle has repeated itself enough throughout history; when such impressive changes drive knowledge forward, it's not a 2941:, but only must be identified as some of the best articles on Knowledge (XXG). As for getting the featured article standards revised, I sincerely wish you good luck. Hopefully Knowledge (XXG) will be the better for it if you do happen to introduce improved standards to the featured article selection process. 3016:
Featuring idiotic content such as poekeomne's or whatever the hell they're called is the reason why wikipedia is routinely banned from use at colleges. This site will never be taken seriously by anyone until the stupid fanboy crap is culled. Poekemenos are not worthy of inclusion anywhere at anytime.
2887:
Now, as for whether this should be a featured article, I don't believe there is a debate. The standards for being a featured article are listed at the top of this talk page, and do not exclude this article. This featured article isn't quite what I might expect (whereas the "Bulbasaur" article would
2572:
Here's the problem, it's obvious this article is well-written from the point of view of someone who's unfamiliar with pokémon, but if you just want information about achamo itself, there's pretty much zero reason you need to read "pokémon is a popular game series" or "the trading card game is ..." ..
2551:
I can understand that viewpoint, but I feel that impressions are also a matter of maturity; basing something on first impressions is also a sign of immaturity, and I believe that academic researchers know better than to judge a book by its cover. Moreover, I believe that such narrow topics proves how
2263:
The problem is that, yes, subject IS important and SHOULD be considered in the Featured Article selection process. Give a "Pokemon" twenty four hours on the front page of this website is just a waste of screen space and is exactly the sort of thing that keeps me from taking this website seriously as
1919:
You don't think it's 'aka' as in red? That's what occurred to me. Um, I'm glad this is a featured article, but it sorta only is because it contains a lot of superfluous information that's irrelevant to Achamo in general, and belongs in the general pokémon article and related articles. Meh, that's how
4360:
The article now is probably quite different from the article originally named GA over a year ago. Whatever issues caused the article to be removed from FA would likely disqualify from GA now, so a former GA status should not automatically be reinstated without a review. Renomination at WP:GAC is the
4200:
Hi, someone brought up this article at the Village Pump, citing it as an example of featured article on a "useless" subject, which of course confuses the point of featured articles. Nevertheless, some people cited some problems with the article that could be fixed to improve it further. The original
2877:
There is a time and place for cursing. This is not it. If you really do lack the class to avoid cursing, and you feel you truly must curse, then I'm not going to stop you. However, I ask that you keep in mind that this is a public forum that is liable to be read by children whose parents will not
2816:
to come, write articles and to contribute. One great great great great motivator is that their written articles or contributions can make the way for an article to become a FA. If we take that away from them by stating "Na Na... that articles subject is all about jibberish rubbish, it can't become a
2278:
No, it wouldn't. The fact is, information about my left testicle is useless information, except in the case of a very small number of people, mainly myself, my doctor, and maybe whatever female I'm currently spending time with. Similarly, an article on a Pokemon is useless information. In the few
2272:
For lack of a better example, we could write an article about my left testicle. It could be very well written, including description, physical data, history, general behavior, public sightings, etc. It could be written exactly in the correct style, and be included in a WikiProject about biology or
3021:
Once again, Knowledge (XXG)'s reputation (or lack thereof) is not based on the content. It is, instead, based on one of the principle ideas behind it - the fact that absolutely anyone can edit it at absolutely any time. You'd think that would introduce many many factual errors - or at least, it has
2823:
well said. there's some truth to the idea that something can only ever become what people will allow it to be. I personally get annoyed when an article on some building in a country i'll never visit gets featured. The only notable thing about it happens to be a few famous people had something to
2759:
The category Torchic is listed under -- Sport and Games, includes video game references, but they are general and, dare I say it, more appropriate than Pokemon. Starcraft, Doom, Half-Life 2, are just some examples. If it's not already been seriously considered for removal from the Featured Articles
3984:
it is acceptable to use primary sources for descriptive points, and there is no requirement i could find at WP:RS that stated sourced material had to be solely about the subject. And as for your opinion of fansites, if a fansite is reputable, subject to indepenent fact-checking, corroborates with
3762:
You realize that based on your arguments a good number of Wikipedians are useless. If Knowledge (XXG) shouldn't have any "fancruft" as you so liberally put it, then well I suppose all my contributions are null and void, as are a number of damn good Wikipedians I know. I don't know how many bloody
3601:
The article on the front page should be something that will grap readers' attention. This isn't even a unique topic: "Torchic are one of the 493 fictional species of Pokémon creatures from the Pokémon media franchise." So we're not even getting an article on Pokemon Creatures or Pokemon Franchise,
2789:
Do you get my point? If Knowledge (XXG) is supposed to be an open encyclopedia for everyone to decide over and to edit, then what kind of articles that could become FAs have to be indefinite. Because as soon as we let the subject of the article to decide if it should become a FA, then virtually NO
2770:
If an article on a Pokemon character can make it through the FA process, then that process needs to be changed. In my view, this is the kind of spectacular failure that makes one question whether the whole Knowledge (XXG) project is worth our time or money. I'm sorry, but I don't agree that this
2298:
by my count, there are only, at most, three people who'd benefit from an article on your left nut. take a look at the edit history of this article. you'll see that there are many more than three people who contributed to this article - even before it's being a front page featured article. if we
3945:
are upheld for things in the world (churches, shopping malls, TV masts, libraries, city streets, schools, professors) versus electronic things which may have more appeal to Knowledge (XXG) editors (such as TV show episodes and characters, video game characters, game weapons, and game spaceships,
3940:
reliable sources, such as main stream publications, which are about Pokemon rather than this specific one out of the 493 characters, or blogs or fansites which are how-to guides for playing the game and exploiting the characteristics of this Pokemon character. I was wondering if some one familiar
3886:
is noticeably quieter than usual. Which is great, because it means I'm only reverting vandalism about every two minutes, rather than every thirty seconds. Perhaps this should be a lesson to us all to ensure that the next time we want to make fancruft a featured article, Christmas is a really good
3862:
Had no idea the times in the history-section were UTC. So if your right then we should have a sh*t-storm comming in in about eight hours (yeah the time will be like 1pm in america and all the lazy vandalizors and pokemon-bathcers will have gotten out of bed :-P) PureRumble 09:59, 23 December 2006
3097:
Obviously, many people are too immature to handle the Internet and such an excellent source as Knowledge (XXG) (due to the obvious amounts of vandalism over a pokemon, like with Bulbasaur; or sexual position FAs). Such immaturity, unfortunately, cannot be countered by sprotection, since we aren't
2922:
As it stands, seeing this as a featured article bugs me for most/many of the reasons already stated. So I'll just state my agreement and move on. My main beef is that, this is the 2nd Pokemon character article to be featured. There are MANY articles that deserve to be featured, and many different
2755:
To be quite frank, this is the sorts of things that make wikipedia lose credibility. The featured articles, displayed prominently on the front page, have almost always prompted me to read up on both their subjects and at least briefly on half a dozen of the interlinks. This is because the topics
2603:
people to edit wikipedia. They'll say "I hate the featured article, and I see that many featured articles aren't up my alley. Perhaps I'll help contribute to create a featured article in my field so that it can be featured on the main page". That's what motivated me to get into the FA process. —
2521:
The problem here is that those outraged by the article's status are too angry to respond coherently. So let me try. Featured articles present a first impression on those visiting the site. One never knows who is clicking on Knowledge (XXG) for the first time, and...sees a Pokemon as the featured
4036:
Main page featured articles are never semi-protected or protected. That defeats the whole purpose of putting them on the main page. They are there so that people can come and edit them to make them better. Now, this article seems to have garnered an unwanted amount of vandalism. But that merely
2648:
Do you realize how much credibility you lose by featuring all of these Pokémon and other fandom articles? Written well? That's great. Good Job! But please have a drink of the reality Kool-Aid before the collective hive puts another juvenile subject on the main page of the site. Maybe there
2196:
Knowledge (XXG)'s featured article is set aside for what are considered the best articles. It doesn't matter whether it is Pokemon, ancient buildings, an artist, or a type of animal. Not everybody will like the featured article, but it recognizes the best articles on Knowledge (XXG), of which
2625:
I was thinking that the current, protected revision of this article is appropriate. There may be some people who want to save the trouble of looking all over Knowledge (XXG) just to know what are Pokémon, or what are Trading Card Games. Giving some small information on this article that have a
2279:
seconds I spent skimming the article, I felt gangrene trying to set in on the frontal lobes of my brain, and I quickly asked myself, "Why am I reading this garbage?" Then I realized that, since it had been a FEATURED ARTICLE, I had mistakenly thought it might be somehow useful or enlightening.
3829:
I was a bit shocked actually. I rushed to the front page to check if this still is the featured article of today. I checked the news.bbc.co.uk just to make sure that america hasn't disappeared or something else that would attract the attention of everyone (especially the vandalizors). But no,
2781:
Just for the record, I give up. No I really really do. That doesn't mean I agree with you, it just means that I'm giving up on this. I feel that many of the stated arguments are coming back and forward repeatedly, and I'm starting to feel that people wont bother to read what has been written
2284:
Sometimes I think that Knowledge (XXG) is entirely too caught up in minutia. Obsessing over the all-important quest to replace a fair-use image with a free-license image instead of expending effort on the INFORMATION in an article is a case of failing too see the forest for the trees.
1953:
Well the only significant shiny Torchic is the "Torchic Star" card, which features what appears to be a shiny Torchic, but I don't think it would help the article fabulously (the article would have to go into shiny Pokémon detail, which has very little to do with Torchic itself).
3989:. Labelling something a "fansite" does not make it uncredible. The reliable sources are being used for description, not analysis. Although it does seem some of the refs are not porperly linking, i'll be contacting the person who put them in to see if he can straighten it out. - 4095:, and being there 24 hours had only positive results (except the vandalz (which can't really count as a result 'cause good wikipedians always keep reverting their changes ;-) )). We have had some good edit and some good discussions about what a featured article should be. 2273:
something. It could have full, 360 degree images, all released to the public domain under a free license. And it could be completely focused, not straying from the all-important topic of my left testicle. That would make a great featured article, wouldn't it?
2675:
is what make wikipedia lose credibility. and u name pokemon as culprit? pokemon have about as much to do with wikipedia credibility as pokemon have to do with george bush credibility and if u think otherwise, wikipedia really not place for u and u should leave
3647:
Sorry, that was an accident - I was trying to revert it to the non-vandalized version of the page, but a Bot had already got it and I reverted to a vandalized version by mistake :). Just noting this here so that I'm not banned or anything, it was an accident.
3673:
It isn't "fancruft" - It's a legitimate article on a fictional subject, and it cites the bulk of its facts. Also, and article's subject itself doesn't have to be "interesting" - but the article has to pass a process to see if it is well written. Cheers :).
856: 3786:
I'm simply applying the definition that the WP:CRUFT essay gives. I don't think the minutia and trivia in this article is interesting to anyone aside from a Pokemon fan. The article cites lots of references, but they come down to be only a few sources. --
2982:. None of these criteria restrict the subject of the article/topic in any way (except that the subject should be relevant enough to have an article/topic on Knowledge (XXG)). I'm assuming I have interpreted the word "featured" (in your comments) correctly. 2577:
Not necessarily. However, academics and people interested in editing/learning are also not likely to be banking their entire interest in Knowledge (XXG) on what is on the main page. If that was the case, Knowledge (XXG) would have a low alexa rating. —
4268:
The article is laden with references to primary sources for facts of questionable importance. How are any of the toys important? Nobody has seen fit to comment on them but Hasbro. How is the recall important? The only party to comment is the recalling
4098:
So, wikipedians! No matter if you consider FAs being overrun and invaded by the unbeatable pokémons is a good thing, or if this is something that ruins your sleep late at nights... I salute you, for a good 24-hours shift! Cheers! *Raising my glass of
3662:
I don't think it's a good idea for fan-cruft to become featured articles. How do I familiarize myself with the featured article selection process, in order to influence it enough to make only serious articles featured candidates in the future? --
4037:
reinforces the original point. Someone will come and see how some jerkoff added "Oprah Winfrey's vagina" (Is that supposed to be funny?) and edit it out. I have my doubts as to this being the work of /b/, since they actually do funny stuff. --
1227: 2857:
Firstly, that proposed policy/guideline (note 'proposed') is about fandom of real people (Edit: Well, I didn't read it up completely--skimmed it--, so correct me if I'm wrong-- 20:58, 23 December 2006 (UTC)). Also, you may want to note that
2730:
Seriously, people joke about wikipedia being full of information about Pokemon and other utterly useless subjects. I thought somebody had somehow hacked the main page when I saw this article was the featured one. Are there that few suitable
808: 3377:
Our featured article selection is based on the quality of content, not the type of content. As long as the article warrents its own article and has a good amount of potential sources, it can eventually qualify for a featured article. —
3545:
There seems to be a bit of a conflict about whether or not this should be a featured article, however please stop posting rude thoughtless comments on this talk page. I must be honest though, I laughed a bit when I saw it... *cough*
2957:
Well this might scare the h*ll out of ya, but I can promise you there are maybe hundreds of Wikipedians out there whoms' ambition is to bring as many pokémon-related articles to FA-status. And NO.... most of them aren't below 10 years
3941:
with the quality of the references could show that there are, say 3 articles from mainstream publications in which this character is the primary subject of the article. This is in relation to a review of how standards for notability
1251: 1345: 4325:
This article was promoted to GA in March 2006 and to FA in June 2006. It was removed from FA in April 2007. Removed FAs are not automatically reassessed as GA without a new GA nomination. You are welcome to nominate it again at
1602:
should not be Featured Article are really clueless as to what other criteria should be met by an FA candidate. It's easy to criticise, but to actually give a meaningful suggestion requires brain, which these people don't have.
2325:
is that an article on the former is simply vanity. wikipedia is not here to boost your ego and that's likely what the chief effect of any article on you or your body parts would be. torchic, in contrast, boosts no ones ego.
820: 1618:
Currently the nihongo templates in paragraph two are incorrect, as the Latin text appears where the Japanese should (causing the strange font). However, there are two ways to change them, and I'm not sure which is best.
2687:
People, get over it! Don't you think the world has bigger problems than whether Knowledge (XXG) featured Torchic as the featured article? Put yourself to doing something constructive instead of complaining about it!
594: 2360:
thing. The shunning of pop culture coverage and whatnot seems like an attempt to strengthen the maturity and "adultness" of a doomed arguement, which, in turn, makes the argument immature and childish, not mature. —
131: 4410: 698: 34: 3086:
This article hasn't been up that long and its already been vandalized numerous time. Should we consider semi-protection if it keep happening? I've made four vandalism removals so far in about 5 minutes
2905:
I understand your concern that such word usage is offensive to some, and I agree that this is not the time or place to curse, but it isn't exactly necessary to edit other people's comments to remove such
2299:
further assume that those contributing only make a small subset of the readers of that article, then pokemon is, hands down, more popular than you (or, by extension, your nut) are likely ever going to be.
1239: 2126:
Knowledge (XXG)-combatants defending FAs on the main page from the evil vandalizors! Be ready! Arms up! Move to the front-line! Chaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaarge! :-) PureRumble 00:04, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
1544:
There has been a lot of people here saying that this article shouldn't be a featured one. If you are one of those, please feel free to contribute to the discussion. But let me remind you about what it
2990:
See, good! Now we have something good to discuss! No really, I mean it! This is something that I'm willing to discuss. I have already stated my opinion above your comments. I *think* the talk page of
4405: 3355:
It seems the primary issue with this article is misplaced passive voice and singular/plural mixup, which is not a huge deal per se, and is easily fixed. I believe Axem took care of most of it. —
2671:
wikipedia is great resource for stuff like world war 2. how does torchic change that any more than the fact that u didnt sign your comment and are an unregistered user invalidates your argument?
832: 607: 844: 3946:
game locations, rock and rap songs and CDs) and fictional things (movies, books, and the characters, scenes, ships, battles, etc. in them.) Your cooperation would be greatly appreciated.
1309: 633: 503: 402: 2312:. information about it - information that almost no one will ever look up - is useless information, except in the case of a very small number of people. kind of like your left testicle. 1276: 1263: 672: 207: 169: 2050:
It is because so much of Knowledge (XXG) consists of extensive entries on trivial crud, that the so much of the mainstream (and more importantly, academia) doesn't take it seriously. --
50: 1327: 3005:. I'm gonna bring that succer to FA-status :-P *Note: FBI, you have the power to bring down druglords... please learn the power of properly copying news-articles with a copy-machine 4460: 3496:
CAN SOMEONE PLEASE REMOVE THESE DISGUSTING IMAGES RIGHT NOW THERE IS A PHOTOGRAPH OF WHAT APPEARS TO BE THE LOWER REGION OF A DEAD WOMAN COVERED IN BLOOD, NAKED. THANKS!!!! --ROB
2093:
If I am guessing right and you feel that this article shouldn't be a featured one... then you can nominate it for review of its FA-status. PureRumble 03:37, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
4465: 188: 4495: 4273:
Additionally, this article doesn't have a single word on the creative process that led to the creation of Torchic, nor a single word of sourced analysis or critical reception.
1895:
Which is my problem ; ) I've fixed it with the second version, thanks for the help Smur. (Like it'll make a difference since the walls are coming down on the stupid FAC ¬_¬)
1333: 569: 4500: 4470: 1506: 659: 150: 4480: 2057:
No, actually - people don't take Knowledge (XXG) seriously because anyone can edit it. Which means it's very possible that someone could put in incorrect information.
711: 4485: 1303: 1295: 685: 4490: 1339: 1321: 4400: 1576:! As long it is a subject that is substantial enough to justify its existence here on Knowledge (XXG) as an ordinary article (atleast I think that's the rule). 1497: 1477: 1438: 1351: 730: 620: 483: 398: 4185:
header. I think skiptotoctalk is an adequate solution. I'd also favor intergrating the Nintendo WikiProject somehow...either to a work group or something.
1289: 4440: 4425: 1569:
Badda-Bing Badda-Bong. That's it! No really! Write an article that fullfills those points and it has a great great potential to become a featured article.
1102: 4420: 3487:
We should temporarily semi-protect the page. Those shock photos are very disturbing and I don't know what would happen if a young child were to see them.
4445: 4430: 3763:
times this can be said; subject matter is entirely irrelevant when it comes to FA. Now please, for the love of all Knowledge (XXG), build a bridge and
1933: 1036: 646: 4064:
More likely, its 7chan. Or one of those /b/invasion offshoots that was created during the whole Jailbait crisis, but most likely the GNAA or something.
4475: 4450: 3936:
Congratulations on getting featured article status. This featured article has a lot of references, but most appear to be either published articles in
2971: 2235: 4202: 564: 448: 112: 4435: 4310:. Changes should be made during the FAR period. If they are not then the article can progress into FARC and potentially have its FA status revoked. 4009:
You need to at least to semi-protect it. I had to click "next 50" at least four times in the history to see an edit that was not on December 23. --
3684: 1425: 1389: 354: 239: 1299: 2991: 2979: 1549: 2771:
article is encyclopedic or even worthwhile in any way to someone who isn't already a Pokemon fan. This should have gone to AfD rather than FA.
2210:
Just a general notice: we are a mature source, so we have excellent articles for every notable topic, from, yes, pokemon to historical figures.
3457:. Knowledge (XXG) is a 💕. We have no choice but to revert vandalism the moment we see it. If we protected every page, you might as well visit 1945: 3374:
I fail to see how this article could have possibly been made a featured article. I could name a couple articles much more worth the title...
4455: 4415: 850: 30: 4295: 3581: 978: 532: 517: 439: 393: 3964:. Giving it full encyclopedic treatment would make it too large of a section on either of those pages. In addition it is featured in a 1221: 4258:
At least a third of the references (I gave up counting) are to poorly-written, not-at-all-analytical anime episode summaries on Serebii.
3562: 2747: 590: 345: 325: 3994: 3834:
Actually, it's only been about an hour. As for America, it's the middle of the night here. Or at least... really early in the morning.
3723: 3619: 3319: 3233: 3172: 3127: 2829: 2659: 2488: 2466: 2179: 2161: 1068: 2264:
reference material, and relegates it to the place of a quick shortcut for getting an overview of a topic instead of real information.
2021:
Ah. Anyway, if it is appropriate, you might want to use the content of this site to help the Pokémon articles on Knowledge (XXG). --
2416: 766: 3878:
I suspect we're also seeing a just-before-Christmas effect here, where people are more concerned with gathering around the family
3227:
Articles can be protected while on the frontpage, but they need like 100 times the amount of vandalism any other article needs. -
802: 3022:
much potential to do so. That's why Knowledge (XXG) is not considered reputable - not because there are articles about Pokémon.
2840: 20: 4146: 4120: 4053: 3530: 3472: 3344: 3071: 2720: 2637: 300: 1437:, and related topics on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join 1245: 4161:
Does anyone think it would be a good idea to add small=yes to most of the templates at the top of this page as is done at
2100:
Hope you guys are ready to face the shitstorm that'll hit the article tomorrow. Me, I'm off to Nottingham for the week :)
930: 2251:
It is of appropriate length, staying focused on the main topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
1565:
It is of appropriate length, staying focused on the main topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
2499: 1016: 2878:
take well to such 'wording' (which might impel them to prevent their children from reading Knowledge (XXG) altogether).
772: 2790:
article will be. There will always be someone who will put up his Object and say that this is a NO-NO. If it is about
2106: 2007: 1958: 1899: 1775: 1754: 1315: 974: 3048:
what Knowledge (XXG) should become. The difference between Nupedia and Knowledge (XXG) is that Nupedia is a 💕 that
2937:. Featured articles are currently not required to be something/someone that nearly everyone knows about, like, say, 43: 4091:
Some moments I was thinking that this day would never come to an end. But here we are! Torchic is no longer on the
2798:
then people might think we are Nazis. The holy pope? No No No No! People might think we are being sponsored by the
1941: 33:. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check 3957: 3515:, for great encyclopedia!", according to Uncyclopedia. However, it looks like with the bots and Wikipedians like 2848: 1088: 1064: 353:
universe on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
2402: 4291: 3586: 888: 814: 794: 4131:
I'm not sure if I get it... you do want peace forever, don't you? ;-) PureRumble 01:57, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
3687:. I'm not much familiar with how it's run myself, so just look around a little at how it's done. Cheers :). -- 2963:"There are MANY articles that deserve to be featured, and many different topics that deserve to be featured " 1928:
Can we add the shiny picture somehow (To help keep featured article?) I dont know how, can someone help out?
306: 2743: 2248:
It has images if they are appropriate to the subject, with succinct captions and acceptable copyright status.
1562:
It has images if they are appropriate to the subject, with succinct captions and acceptable copyright status.
3558: 1269: 1257: 1154: 1134: 776: 288: 3550: 2934: 2859: 2847:
The subject isn't controversial; it's irrelevant to the real world and the lives of anyone older than 10.
2735: 2655: 2540:. if pokemon controversial, i say more power to wikipedia. it good to shake thing up - to challenge people 3683:
Although if you do want to be involved in the featuring process for articles, this is the place to go to:
2672: 2663: 2339: 2322: 2309: 2070: 1417: 668: 3801:
I don't think I was clear. I was talking to the person who started this heading. Just for the record.
3576: 1866: 1828: 1732: 4162: 4018:
Yeah, this seems to be the work of /b/. I agree that this page is some serious need of a vandelism lock.
3883: 3809: 3774: 3688: 3675: 3649: 3631: 3554: 3439: 2889: 2739: 2696: 2677: 2541: 2412: 1937: 1505:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
447:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
232: 4135:
Of course! But not everyone seems to want it (they know who they are...and you're not one of them). --
4010: 3703:
had three FACs. The community has offered stiff resistance to making these articles featured already.
3501: 2511: 1604: 4255:
Reference #3 is directly to a Japanese-English dictionary, which makes no reference to Torchic at all.
4252:
The claim of the origin of the name, a debatable linguistic analysis, is sourced to a Pokémon fansite.
3419: 3289:
Just for information's sake I've checked all transcluded templates and they're all fully protected. --
3304: 2327: 1984:
The only problem is that, since this page contains 300-over pictures, it is bound to load slowly. --
1599: 926: 1213: 4362: 4331: 4281: 4141: 4115: 4065: 4048: 4019: 3525: 3467: 3388: 3365: 3339: 3268: 3199: 3146: 3108: 3088: 3066: 2715: 2632: 2614: 2588: 2562: 2371: 2224: 2198: 1993:
Unfortunately, there appears to be some kind of Copyright on the site, but I can't read French. --
1973: 1012: 221: 64: 4311: 4245:; this isn't cited as a source that Combusken is a flying Pokémon; it's cited as a source that it 3512: 2338:
I applaud Knowledge (XXG) for being bold and featuring articles like this. Flipping awesome, man.
3888: 3330: 2761: 2523: 2190:
Was it you whom made that comment, "Let's rape Torchic!"? Rest assured that it no longer exists.
940: 431: 3826:
Almost 2 hours has passed since the last vandal (if I'm reading the dates and times correctly).
1233: 762: 4377: 4351: 4078: 3990: 3985:
other independent sources, declares it's sources, and is stable it passes the requirements at
3965: 3956:
Torchic is a notable fictional character because it is an arguably main character in both the
3571:
You're one to talk with those vandalism templates on your user page. Sign your posts with ~~~~
3436: 3383: 3360: 3103: 2825: 2772: 2609: 2583: 2557: 2366: 2219: 2012: 2004: 1963: 1955: 1904: 1896: 1856: 1780: 1772: 1759: 1751: 3973: 4179: 4166: 3846: 3804: 3769: 3739: 3290: 2691: 2439: 2407: 2399: 2387: 1502: 1116: 4327: 4307: 3981: 3735: 2844: 4186: 4028: 3961: 3837: 3704: 3488: 3027: 2944: 2909: 2865: 2060: 1182: 694: 4232:
miserably. I was looking at the references closely, and they don't stand up to scrutiny.
3986: 3977: 3937: 3929: 2573:
perhaps those examples would actually suffice, but anything more is unrelated to achamo.
2245:
It complies with the standards set out in the manual of style and relevant WikiProjects .
1559:
It complies with the standards set out in the manual of style and relevant WikiProjects .
2649:
should be a common sense officer who has the authority to put the brakes on this stuff.
1929: 4209: 4136: 4110: 4038: 3520: 3462: 3380: 3357: 3334: 3100: 3061: 2938: 2710: 2627: 2606: 2580: 2554: 2537: 2382:
But it has a paucity of reliable sources. Most of the sources are personal fan sites. —
2363: 2216: 2135: 2036: 2022: 1994: 1985: 1130: 920: 902: 655: 4229: 3942: 3925: 2426:
It looks like all of the cited footnotes except Gamespy, Ign, and the Hasbro website.
1579:
Please keep this in mind while you discuss if this article should be featured or not.
4394: 3788: 3754: 3664: 3410: 2924: 2498:
Also, wasn't the opposite, but in many ways similar, argument made a while back when
2051: 2032: 1595: 1074: 1022: 946: 707: 3056:
can edit. If we started protecting every page on Knowledge (XXG), it is no longer a
2809:
See...? So the only good thing is to simply state that any article can become a FA.
2552:
Knowledge (XXG) can provide diverse, well written articles without excess detail. —
2510:. You'd think people who complain would at least try to stay consistent...*hides* -- 2460:
Maybe it's just my pro-Serebii bias, but Pokebeach is kinda not all that reliable. -
1586:
The fact that nobody responds to this message is proof enough that people who think
493: 4373: 4347: 3718: 3611: 3516: 3314: 3228: 3167: 3122: 2987:"I feel that perhaps the definition of what qualifies for a FA may need revision." 2795: 2483: 2461: 2286: 2174: 2156: 984: 960: 681: 4243: 2954:"My main beef is that, this is the 2nd Pokemon character article to be featured." 473: 3947: 3912:
Just LOL! That's a really good idea :)! PureRumble 00:50, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
3002: 2799: 2783: 2533: 2435: 2383: 2083: 1489: 1471: 1050: 874: 756: 752: 3717:
get enough influence to be able to oppose a FAC and have it definitely fail. -
2817:
FA" then what do you think will happen with all those potential contributors?
2791: 2101: 1982:
the shiny artwork for the first 386 Pokémon (including the four Deoxys modes).
1411: 1407: 1401: 1383: 1140: 826: 726: 616: 525: 444: 421: 350: 253: 3734:
Mike, we want Featured Articles to be of high quality, and that's the job of
4092: 4074: 3753:
It's unfortunate that the need for Pokepedia has eluded the Pokepedians. --
3700: 3630:
Just because you don't find it interesting doesn't mean other people won't.
3333:
just made an edit. You might want to re-read the whole article, Amarkov. --
2148: 1591: 998: 936: 838: 415: 387: 226: 4109:
Vandalism over, peace forever (well, not really, but you get the idea)! --
3198:
I meant while it was FA. I seem to remember reading that in its talk page
2255:
So yes, I agree with Amarkov. It's about how well written it is, not about
1821:. Note that in the first one it appears smaller and uses a different font. 3145:
I thought Bulbasaur was protected though? Please correct me if I'm wrong
2843:? Knowledge (XXG) is not supposed to provide information on everything. 2242:
It is well written, comprehensive, factually accurate, neutral and stable.
1556:
It is well written, comprehensive, factually accurate, neutral and stable.
3879: 2803: 603: 4100: 3500:
Try clearing various Internet things, they were removed a while ago. --
3458: 3041: 2626:
relation to Pokémon and its mechanics would be wise, in my opinion. --
1587: 1168: 642: 258: 4175:
No, because I find it to be virtually unreadable, especially for the
3313:
That's entirely unhelpful. Maybe try making constructive criticism? -
3040:
a 💕, and was expertly written, then Knowledge (XXG) becomes another
1722:, a breed of Japanese bird, originally bred for fighting or hunting. 1675:, a breed of Japanese bird, originally bred for fighting or hunting. 629: 4342:
Um... I'm confused. It passed GA before, so why does being promoted
337: 319: 4043: 3969: 3845:
If the American vandalwave hasn't come yet it is sure bound to. --
3830:
nothing :-/ So how come? PureRumble 09:37, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
1709: 1660: 1434: 1430: 916: 249: 3407:
Please remove and ban the user who put up the photo of the butt.
3267:
Thanks for the information, it helped to clear up my confusion.
3001:
Now if you will excuse me, I will go and continue my research on
4240:
Many of the cited references don't even back up the claims made.
3057: 2427: 2308:
if you think wikipedia is caught up in minutia, take a look at
4381: 4367: 4355: 4336: 4314: 4300: 4214: 4189: 4169: 4151: 4125: 4081: 4068: 4058: 4031: 4022: 4013: 3998: 3950: 3891: 3849: 3840: 3816: 3791: 3781: 3757: 3745: 3728: 3707: 3691: 3678: 3667: 3652: 3634: 3624: 3591: 3535: 3504: 3491: 3477: 3442: 3422: 3392: 3369: 3349: 3324: 3307: 3293: 3271: 3238: 3202: 3177: 3149: 3132: 3112: 3091: 3076: 3030: 2947: 2927: 2912: 2892: 2868: 2851: 2833: 2775: 2764: 2725: 2703: 2680: 2642: 2618: 2592: 2566: 2544: 2526: 2514: 2493: 2471: 2445: 2421: 2393: 2375: 2342: 2330: 2321:
of course, the real difference between your left testicle and
2289: 2228: 2201: 2184: 2166: 2138: 2134:
Bulbasaur was a good featured article, but this is just shit.
2112: 2086: 2073: 2063: 2039: 2025: 2015: 1997: 1988: 1972:
There is a picture of Shiny Torchic in its Ruby-Sapphire pose
1966: 1907: 1878: 1840: 1783: 1762: 1744: 1607: 282: 4276:
I'm not sure if this is FA quality. I'm not sure if this is
3036:
Indeed, M C Y. Think of it this way: if Knowledge (XXG) was
492: 472: 3060:. Knowledge (XXG) is unique because anyone can edit it. -- 2812:
Another point is that we want Knowledge (XXG) to encourage
2431: 2079:... Please feel free to elaborate your, three words. (???) 4411:
Featured articles that have appeared on the main page once
4203:
Knowledge (XXG):Village pump (miscellaneous)#Shame, really
3121:
We are, if they get about ten times the vandalism here. -
2994:
is the correct place to present views and share thoughts.
2035:
for a near-rendition of the first 386 Shiny Pokémon! --
349:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the 49:
This article appeared on Knowledge (XXG)'s Main Page as
4306:
Then it is obvious we have to nominate this article on
3645: 1356: 1188: 1174: 1160: 1146: 1122: 1108: 1094: 1080: 1056: 1042: 1028: 1004: 990: 966: 952: 908: 894: 880: 574: 559: 554: 549: 544: 539: 225:
A fact from this article appeared on Knowledge (XXG)'s
200: 181: 162: 143: 124: 105: 86: 2506:
to be featured on the front page, but now this is too
2259:
it is about. PureRumble 00:56, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
4406:
Featured articles that have appeared on the main page
3418:
OMG Why did I let my kids do research on Wikipeida!
1501:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 1429:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 443:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 2269:WARNING: I'M ABOUT TO BE VULGAR TO MAKE A POINT! 1515:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Fictional characters 3602:we're hearing about 1/493rd of this franchise. 1807: 1657: 1640: 1623: 299:does not require a rating on Knowledge (XXG)'s 4220:Critical issue: sourcing and comprehensiveness 4077:was protected when it was a featured article. 2502:was featured? Apparently that content was too 2173:Because it's written well. Stop complaining. - 1814: 1799: 1715: 1700: 1687: 1668: 1649: 1632: 4461:Redirect-Class video game characters articles 4261:The references to Gamespy, IGN, and Gamespot 3822:For the sake of record... everything is calm. 3052:can edit, while Knowledge (XXG) is a 💕 that 8: 4466:NA-importance video game characters articles 3610:to be on a particularly interesting topic. - 3166:It may be, but it isn't on the front page. - 4496:Redirect-Class fictional character articles 3685:Knowledge (XXG):Featured article candidates 1750:Which is the strange font? And the second. 1447:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Anime and manga 1103:Lego Indiana Jones: The Original Adventures 3098:allowed to sprotect frontpage articles. — 3012:--PureRumble 23:48, 23 December 2006 (UTC) 2992:Knowledge (XXG):What is a featured article 1466: 1378: 512: 382: 314: 58: 15: 4501:WikiProject Fictional characters articles 4471:Video game characters task force articles 4106:PureRumble 00:57, 24 December 2006 (UTC) 2820:PureRumble 17:18, 23 December 2006 (UTC) 2794:, then it is to childish. If it is about 1582:PureRumble 17:18, 23 December 2006 (UTC) 1518:Template:WikiProject Fictional characters 4401:Knowledge (XXG) former featured articles 4372:Fine by me, just wanted clarification. - 3519:, we should be just fine...I hope... -- 2155:of fancruft from it about a month ago. - 4481:Redirect-Class anime and manga articles 4027:I also agree. It should be locked! :o 3738:. The subject matter is not important. 2482:Yes, because swearing is sooo mature. - 1468: 1380: 1037:Pokémon Sword and Shield Expansion Pass 457:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Video games 384: 316: 4486:NA-importance anime and manga articles 248:Did you know ...that one of the three 4491:All WikiProject Anime and manga pages 4421:Knowledge (XXG) Did you know articles 4361:appropriate way to have it reviewed. 4196:Critical commentary from Village Pump 1495:This redirect is within the scope of 1423:This redirect is within the scope of 1200: 437:This redirect is within the scope of 343:This redirect is within the scope of 286: 7: 4087:I salute you for a good day of work! 1450:Template:WikiProject Anime and manga 866: 852:Five Nights at Freddy's: Help Wanted 504:the Video game characters task force 4346:mean that it's no longer be a GA? - 4242:For example, take the reference to 3972:. It fulfills the requirements at 2966:An article deserves to be featured 2841:Knowledge (XXG):Notability_(fandom) 537: 363:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Pokémon 305:It is of interest to the following 4441:Redirect-Class video game articles 3699:This had to go through two FACs. 2974:. A topic deserves to be featured 2197:Torchic is obviously one of them. 1223:The Legend of Zelda: Majora's Mask 14: 4446:NA-importance video game articles 2709:Well said, DoomsDay! I agree! -- 4476:WikiProject Video games articles 4451:Redirect-Class Nintendo articles 3024:Also, sign your posts with ~~~~. 2214:professionalism and maturity. — 1976:. In fact, this page has almost 1498:WikiProject Fictional characters 1488: 1470: 1410: 1400: 1382: 1212: 1199: 865: 793: 591:List of Pokémon special episodes 460:Template:WikiProject Video games 424: 414: 386: 336: 318: 287: 220: 63: 42: 19: 4426:Redirect-Class Pokémon articles 1681:The Japanese name for Torchic, 1622:The Japanese name for Torchic, 4431:NA-importance Pokémon articles 3882:than editing Knowledge (XXG). 2978:it embodies the criteria of a 2970:it embodies the criteria of a 2760:list, it definitely should be. 2348:Exactly. This is displaying a 2069:No. Just no. Just... no. No.-- 1247:Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare 501:This redirect is supported by 481:This redirect is supported by 1: 4190:03:26, 29 December 2006 (UTC) 4170:05:38, 26 December 2006 (UTC) 4152:02:14, 24 December 2006 (UTC) 4126:01:46, 24 December 2006 (UTC) 4082:23:07, 23 December 2006 (UTC) 4069:04:44, 24 December 2006 (UTC) 4059:22:47, 23 December 2006 (UTC) 4032:19:02, 23 December 2006 (UTC) 4023:18:38, 23 December 2006 (UTC) 4014:17:41, 23 December 2006 (UTC) 3999:17:07, 23 December 2006 (UTC) 3951:15:32, 23 December 2006 (UTC) 3892:23:50, 23 December 2006 (UTC) 3850:09:51, 23 December 2006 (UTC) 3841:09:47, 23 December 2006 (UTC) 3817:06:50, 24 December 2006 (UTC) 3792:21:02, 23 December 2006 (UTC) 3782:18:03, 23 December 2006 (UTC) 3758:21:02, 23 December 2006 (UTC) 3746:13:34, 23 December 2006 (UTC) 3729:05:05, 23 December 2006 (UTC) 3708:05:04, 23 December 2006 (UTC) 3692:04:51, 23 December 2006 (UTC) 3679:04:43, 23 December 2006 (UTC) 3668:04:39, 23 December 2006 (UTC) 3653:04:39, 23 December 2006 (UTC) 3635:04:53, 23 December 2006 (UTC) 3625:04:38, 23 December 2006 (UTC) 3592:03:02, 23 December 2006 (UTC) 3536:04:39, 23 December 2006 (UTC) 3505:03:19, 23 December 2006 (UTC) 3492:02:54, 23 December 2006 (UTC) 3478:04:36, 23 December 2006 (UTC) 3443:05:15, 23 December 2006 (UTC) 3423:03:03, 23 December 2006 (UTC) 3393:03:05, 23 December 2006 (UTC) 3370:02:35, 23 December 2006 (UTC) 3350:02:32, 23 December 2006 (UTC) 3325:02:17, 23 December 2006 (UTC) 3308:02:13, 23 December 2006 (UTC) 3294:06:27, 23 December 2006 (UTC) 3272:00:58, 23 December 2006 (UTC) 3239:00:56, 23 December 2006 (UTC) 3203:00:55, 23 December 2006 (UTC) 3178:00:54, 23 December 2006 (UTC) 3150:00:55, 23 December 2006 (UTC) 3133:00:52, 23 December 2006 (UTC) 3113:00:52, 23 December 2006 (UTC) 3092:00:45, 23 December 2006 (UTC) 3077:03:40, 24 December 2006 (UTC) 3031:02:48, 24 December 2006 (UTC) 2948:23:30, 23 December 2006 (UTC) 2928:23:05, 23 December 2006 (UTC) 2913:23:30, 23 December 2006 (UTC) 2893:21:29, 23 December 2006 (UTC) 2869:20:49, 23 December 2006 (UTC) 2852:18:58, 23 December 2006 (UTC) 2839:Doesn't this article violate 2834:17:41, 23 December 2006 (UTC) 2776:16:36, 23 December 2006 (UTC) 2765:15:32, 23 December 2006 (UTC) 2726:04:51, 23 December 2006 (UTC) 2704:04:48, 23 December 2006 (UTC) 2681:05:04, 23 December 2006 (UTC) 2643:03:39, 23 December 2006 (UTC) 2619:03:25, 23 December 2006 (UTC) 2593:03:19, 23 December 2006 (UTC) 2567:03:09, 23 December 2006 (UTC) 2545:03:01, 23 December 2006 (UTC) 2527:02:54, 23 December 2006 (UTC) 2515:02:38, 23 December 2006 (UTC) 2494:02:07, 23 December 2006 (UTC) 2472:01:50, 23 December 2006 (UTC) 2446:01:51, 23 December 2006 (UTC) 2422:01:48, 23 December 2006 (UTC) 2394:01:40, 23 December 2006 (UTC) 2376:01:21, 23 December 2006 (UTC) 2343:01:05, 23 December 2006 (UTC) 2331:15:35, 23 December 2006 (UTC) 2290:08:37, 23 December 2006 (UTC) 2229:00:46, 23 December 2006 (UTC) 2202:00:45, 23 December 2006 (UTC) 2185:00:41, 23 December 2006 (UTC) 2167:00:07, 23 December 2006 (UTC) 2139:00:05, 23 December 2006 (UTC) 2113:11:07, 22 December 2006 (UTC) 2087:00:22, 23 December 2006 (UTC) 2074:02:32, 21 December 2006 (UTC) 2064:20:49, 23 December 2006 (UTC) 1608:01:03, 25 December 2006 (UTC) 1509:and see a list of open tasks. 1441:and see a list of open tasks. 1210: 1197: 863: 804:List of generation IX Pokémon 791: 785: 746: 584: 530: 451:and see a list of open tasks. 357:and see a list of open tasks. 4456:Nintendo task force articles 4436:WikiProject Pokémon articles 4416:Old requests for peer review 4263:don't mention Torchic at all 2935:notability is not subjective 2860:notability is not subjective 2500:History of erotic depictions 2428:http://www.pebbleversion.com 2040:13:14, 25 October 2006 (UTC) 1521:fictional character articles 792:Featured content candidates 366:Template:WikiProject Pokémon 4228:sourced, and seems to fail 4215:17:51, 9 January 2007 (UTC) 3987:WP:RS#Non-scholarly sources 2430:is the worst offender, but 2236:What is a featured article? 1808: 1658: 1641: 1624: 1572:The subject of the article 1540:What is a Featured Article? 1426:WikiProject Anime and manga 1207:No did you know nominations 246:The text of the entry was: 4517: 4382:18:29, 15 April 2007 (UTC) 4368:18:03, 15 April 2007 (UTC) 4356:17:20, 15 April 2007 (UTC) 4337:15:37, 15 April 2007 (UTC) 3976:on being notable. as for 2434:, etc. are weak as well. — 1771:And yay, first topic! ; ) 1211:Reviews and reassessments 208:Featured article candidate 170:Featured article candidate 151:Featured article candidate 4315:00:50, 9 March 2007 (UTC) 4301:23:00, 8 March 2007 (UTC) 2026:05:44, 24 June 2006 (UTC) 2016:06:52, 22 June 2006 (UTC) 1998:03:37, 22 June 2006 (UTC) 1989:03:30, 22 June 2006 (UTC) 1967:13:21, 11 June 2006 (UTC) 1815: 1716: 1701: 1688: 1669: 1650: 1633: 1483: 1395: 1286: 864:Good article nominations 784: 583: 528: 511: 500: 480: 409: 331: 313: 269: 217: 61: 57: 37:) and why it was removed. 3606:Featured articles don't 3403:Who put up that picture? 2432:http://www.psypokes.com/ 1908:17:03, 8 June 2006 (UTC) 1879:17:01, 8 June 2006 (UTC) 1841:17:01, 8 June 2006 (UTC) 1784:16:58, 8 June 2006 (UTC) 1763:16:53, 8 June 2006 (UTC) 1745:16:30, 8 June 2006 (UTC) 1453:anime and manga articles 1065:The King of Fighters '99 975:Pokémon Sword and Shield 889:Puff-puff (onomatopoeia) 816:Mario Party: The Top 100 51:Today's featured article 4103:and eating some chips* 2151:recently? I removed an 1707:, a term for baby, and 1694:, is a portmanteau of 1656:, a term for baby, and 1639:, is a portmanteau of 1259:A Space for the Unbound 1155:The Great Giana Sisters 773:Minecraft – Volume Beta 533:Video games WikiProject 518:Video games WikiProject 484:the Nintendo task force 440:WikiProject Video games 272:Former featured article 189:Featured article review 132:WikiProject peer review 31:former featured article 4249:a flying Pokémon. WTF? 3483:about the shock images 2673:John Seigenthaler, Sr. 2071:The Sultan of Surreal. 1800: 1418:Anime and manga portal 1346:translation from japan 1089:Fan-made Pokémon games 669:SuperBot Entertainment 497: 477: 35:the nomination archive 3982:writing about fiction 3303:this article sucks.-- 2845:WP:NOT#INDISCRIMINATE 2082:Two words. Hooray! -- 2003:It doesn't need one! 1936:comment was added by 1290:Articles that need... 496: 476: 53:on December 23, 2006. 4163:Talk:Knowledge (XXG) 4005:Protect this page!!! 2849:Delirium of disorder 1600:Abu Musab al-Zarqawi 1512:Fictional characters 1503:fictional characters 1478:Fictional characters 927:Shin Megami Tensei V 789:No major discussions 94:Good article nominee 3641:Regarding this edit 2323:Collège de Montaigu 2310:Collège de Montaigu 2033:this PokéBeach page 1550:article is featured 463:video game articles 346:WikiProject Pokémon 4157:Talk template tags 3887:time to do it. ;) 2806:!? He He He He... 1013:Yoshi's New Island 498: 478: 432:Video games portal 301:content assessment 69:Article milestones 4380: 4354: 4299: 4235:Some highlights: 4201:discussion is at 3743: 3727: 3623: 3567: 3553:comment added by 3437:agent provocateur 3323: 3237: 3176: 3131: 2752: 2738:comment added by 2658:comment added by 2599:Moreover, it can 2492: 2470: 2420: 2183: 2165: 2115: 1949: 1857:Internet Explorer 1725:Which is better? 1537: 1536: 1533: 1532: 1529: 1528: 1465: 1464: 1461: 1460: 1377: 1376: 1373: 1372: 1369: 1368: 1365: 1364: 786:Other discussions 747:Merge discussions 381: 380: 377: 376: 281: 280: 277: 276: 4508: 4376: 4350: 4289: 4287: 4224:This article is 4212: 4208: 4184: 4178: 4149: 4144: 4139: 4123: 4118: 4113: 4056: 4051: 4046: 4041: 3812: 3807: 3777: 3772: 3741: 3721: 3689:Brandt Luke Zorn 3676:Brandt Luke Zorn 3658:Pokemon Features 3650:Brandt Luke Zorn 3617: 3589: 3584: 3579: 3566: 3547: 3533: 3528: 3523: 3511:"Take off every 3475: 3470: 3465: 3386: 3363: 3347: 3342: 3337: 3317: 3231: 3170: 3125: 3106: 3074: 3069: 3064: 2972:featured article 2751: 2732: 2723: 2718: 2713: 2699: 2694: 2667: 2640: 2635: 2630: 2612: 2586: 2560: 2532:controversy won 2486: 2464: 2410: 2405: 2369: 2222: 2177: 2159: 2110: 2010: 1961: 1938:Qwerasdfzxcvvcxz 1931: 1902: 1877: 1873: 1865: 1839: 1835: 1827: 1820: 1818: 1817: 1811: 1805: 1803: 1778: 1757: 1743: 1739: 1731: 1721: 1719: 1718: 1706: 1704: 1703: 1693: 1691: 1690: 1674: 1672: 1671: 1665: 1655: 1653: 1652: 1646: 1638: 1636: 1635: 1629: 1523: 1522: 1519: 1516: 1513: 1492: 1485: 1484: 1474: 1467: 1455: 1454: 1451: 1448: 1445: 1420: 1415: 1414: 1404: 1397: 1396: 1386: 1379: 1273:(NES video game) 1216: 1203: 1202: 1198:DYK nominations 1191: 1177: 1163: 1149: 1125: 1117:The Outer Worlds 1111: 1097: 1083: 1059: 1045: 1031: 1007: 993: 969: 955: 911: 897: 883: 869: 868: 797: 740: 721: 526: 513: 465: 464: 461: 458: 455: 434: 429: 428: 427: 418: 411: 410: 405: 390: 383: 371: 370: 369:Pokémon articles 367: 364: 361: 340: 333: 332: 322: 315: 292: 291: 283: 270:Current status: 224: 203: 184: 165: 146: 127: 108: 89: 68: 67: 59: 46: 23: 16: 4516: 4515: 4511: 4510: 4509: 4507: 4506: 4505: 4391: 4390: 4323: 4283: 4222: 4210: 4206: 4198: 4182: 4176: 4159: 4147: 4142: 4137: 4121: 4116: 4111: 4089: 4054: 4049: 4044: 4039: 4007: 3997: 3934: 3824: 3810: 3805: 3775: 3770: 3726: 3660: 3643: 3622: 3599: 3587: 3582: 3577: 3548: 3543: 3531: 3526: 3521: 3485: 3473: 3468: 3463: 3405: 3384: 3361: 3345: 3340: 3335: 3322: 3301: 3236: 3175: 3130: 3104: 3084: 3072: 3067: 3062: 2832: 2733: 2721: 2716: 2711: 2697: 2692: 2653: 2638: 2633: 2628: 2610: 2584: 2558: 2491: 2469: 2403: 2367: 2340:209.107.122.185 2220: 2182: 2164: 2109: 2048: 2008: 1959: 1932:—The preceding 1926: 1900: 1875: 1867: 1860: 1859:apparently...) 1837: 1829: 1822: 1812: 1797: 1776: 1755: 1741: 1733: 1726: 1713: 1698: 1685: 1666: 1647: 1630: 1616: 1542: 1520: 1517: 1514: 1511: 1510: 1452: 1449: 1446: 1444:Anime and manga 1443: 1442: 1416: 1409: 1390:Anime and manga 1361: 1282: 1235:Pokémon Channel 1217: 1209: 1208: 1204: 1196: 1187: 1183:Visions of Mana 1173: 1159: 1145: 1121: 1107: 1093: 1079: 1055: 1041: 1027: 1003: 989: 965: 951: 907: 893: 879: 870: 862: 798: 790: 787: 782: 763:Pokémon Emerald 748: 745: 738: 719: 695:Super Mario War 586: 579: 536: 462: 459: 456: 453: 452: 430: 425: 423: 396: 368: 365: 362: 359: 358: 265: 264: 244: 199: 180: 161: 142: 123: 104: 85: 62: 12: 11: 5: 4514: 4512: 4504: 4503: 4498: 4493: 4488: 4483: 4478: 4473: 4468: 4463: 4458: 4453: 4448: 4443: 4438: 4433: 4428: 4423: 4418: 4413: 4408: 4403: 4393: 4392: 4389: 4388: 4387: 4386: 4385: 4384: 4322: 4319: 4318: 4317: 4271: 4270: 4266: 4259: 4256: 4253: 4250: 4221: 4218: 4197: 4194: 4193: 4192: 4158: 4155: 4133: 4132: 4088: 4085: 4072: 4071: 4066:BrendantheJedi 4020:BrendantheJedi 4006: 4003: 4002: 4001: 3993: 3933: 3923: 3922: 3921: 3920: 3919: 3918: 3917: 3916: 3915: 3914: 3913: 3901: 3900: 3899: 3898: 3897: 3896: 3895: 3894: 3884:Recent changes 3869: 3868: 3867: 3866: 3865: 3864: 3855: 3854: 3853: 3852: 3835: 3823: 3820: 3799: 3798: 3797: 3796: 3795: 3794: 3760: 3732: 3731: 3722: 3697: 3696: 3695: 3694: 3659: 3656: 3642: 3639: 3638: 3637: 3618: 3615: 3614: 3598: 3597:Interesting??? 3595: 3574: 3573: 3572: 3542: 3539: 3509: 3508: 3484: 3481: 3450: 3449: 3448: 3447: 3446: 3445: 3428: 3427: 3426: 3425: 3404: 3401: 3400: 3399: 3398: 3397: 3396: 3395: 3328: 3327: 3318: 3300: 3297: 3287: 3286: 3285: 3284: 3283: 3282: 3281: 3280: 3279: 3278: 3277: 3276: 3275: 3274: 3269:MelicansMatkin 3252: 3251: 3250: 3249: 3248: 3247: 3246: 3245: 3244: 3243: 3242: 3241: 3232: 3214: 3213: 3212: 3211: 3210: 3209: 3208: 3207: 3206: 3205: 3200:MelicansMatkin 3187: 3186: 3185: 3184: 3183: 3182: 3181: 3180: 3171: 3157: 3156: 3155: 3154: 3153: 3152: 3147:MelicansMatkin 3138: 3137: 3136: 3135: 3126: 3116: 3115: 3089:MelicansMatkin 3083: 3080: 3034: 3033: 3025: 3023: 3014: 3013: 3010: 2998: 2997: 2996: 2995: 2985: 2984: 2983: 2980:featured topic 2976:if and only if 2968:if and only if 2961: 2960: 2959: 2951: 2950: 2942: 2939:George W. Bush 2920: 2919: 2918: 2917: 2916: 2915: 2907: 2898: 2897: 2896: 2895: 2882: 2881: 2880: 2879: 2872: 2871: 2863: 2838: 2828: 2779: 2778: 2707: 2706: 2684: 2683: 2646: 2645: 2622: 2621: 2596: 2595: 2570: 2569: 2548: 2547: 2538:pulitzer prize 2519: 2518: 2496: 2487: 2479: 2478: 2477: 2476: 2475: 2474: 2465: 2453: 2452: 2451: 2450: 2449: 2448: 2379: 2378: 2336: 2335: 2334: 2333: 2316: 2315: 2314: 2313: 2303: 2302: 2301: 2300: 2293: 2292: 2281: 2280: 2275: 2274: 2270: 2266: 2265: 2253: 2252: 2249: 2246: 2243: 2239: 2238: 2232: 2231: 2207: 2206: 2205: 2204: 2199:MelicansMatkin 2188: 2187: 2178: 2170: 2169: 2160: 2153:entire section 2132: 2131: 2130: 2129: 2128: 2127: 2119: 2118: 2117: 2116: 2105: 2095: 2094: 2091: 2090: 2089: 2067: 2066: 2058: 2047: 2044: 2043: 2042: 2019: 2018: 1983: 1970: 1969: 1925: 1922: 1917: 1916: 1915: 1914: 1913: 1912: 1911: 1910: 1886: 1885: 1884: 1883: 1882: 1881: 1848: 1847: 1846: 1845: 1844: 1843: 1789: 1788: 1787: 1786: 1766: 1765: 1615: 1612: 1611: 1610: 1574:doesn't matter 1567: 1566: 1563: 1560: 1557: 1548:means that an 1541: 1538: 1535: 1534: 1531: 1530: 1527: 1526: 1524: 1507:the discussion 1493: 1481: 1480: 1475: 1463: 1462: 1459: 1458: 1456: 1439:the discussion 1422: 1421: 1405: 1393: 1392: 1387: 1375: 1374: 1371: 1370: 1367: 1366: 1363: 1362: 1360: 1359: 1354: 1349: 1343: 1337: 1331: 1325: 1319: 1313: 1307: 1287: 1284: 1283: 1281: 1280: 1267: 1255: 1243: 1231: 1218: 1206: 1205: 1195: 1194: 1180: 1166: 1152: 1138: 1131:Iron Soldier 2 1128: 1114: 1100: 1086: 1072: 1062: 1048: 1034: 1020: 1010: 996: 982: 972: 958: 944: 934: 924: 914: 903:Tina Armstrong 900: 886: 871: 861: 860: 848: 836: 824: 812: 799: 788: 783: 781: 780: 770: 760: 749: 744: 743: 724: 705: 692: 679: 666: 656:Minecraft@Home 653: 640: 627: 614: 601: 587: 581: 580: 578: 577: 572: 567: 562: 557: 552: 547: 542: 529: 522: 521: 509: 508: 499: 489: 488: 479: 469: 468: 466: 449:the discussion 436: 435: 419: 407: 406: 391: 379: 378: 375: 374: 372: 355:the discussion 341: 329: 328: 323: 311: 310: 304: 293: 279: 278: 275: 274: 267: 266: 245: 219: 218: 215: 214: 211: 204: 196: 195: 192: 185: 182:April 13, 2007 177: 176: 173: 166: 158: 157: 154: 147: 144:April 17, 2006 139: 138: 135: 128: 125:April 14, 2006 120: 119: 116: 109: 106:April 13, 2006 101: 100: 97: 90: 87:March 31, 2006 82: 81: 78: 75: 71: 70: 55: 54: 47: 39: 38: 24: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 4513: 4502: 4499: 4497: 4494: 4492: 4489: 4487: 4484: 4482: 4479: 4477: 4474: 4472: 4469: 4467: 4464: 4462: 4459: 4457: 4454: 4452: 4449: 4447: 4444: 4442: 4439: 4437: 4434: 4432: 4429: 4427: 4424: 4422: 4419: 4417: 4414: 4412: 4409: 4407: 4404: 4402: 4399: 4398: 4396: 4383: 4379: 4375: 4371: 4370: 4369: 4366: 4365: 4359: 4358: 4357: 4353: 4349: 4345: 4341: 4340: 4339: 4338: 4335: 4334: 4329: 4320: 4316: 4313: 4309: 4305: 4304: 4303: 4302: 4297: 4293: 4288: 4286: 4279: 4274: 4267: 4264: 4260: 4257: 4254: 4251: 4248: 4244: 4241: 4238: 4237: 4236: 4233: 4231: 4227: 4219: 4217: 4216: 4213: 4204: 4195: 4191: 4188: 4181: 4174: 4173: 4172: 4171: 4168: 4164: 4156: 4154: 4153: 4150: 4145: 4140: 4130: 4129: 4128: 4127: 4124: 4119: 4114: 4107: 4104: 4102: 4096: 4094: 4086: 4084: 4083: 4080: 4076: 4070: 4067: 4063: 4062: 4061: 4060: 4057: 4052: 4047: 4042: 4034: 4033: 4030: 4025: 4024: 4021: 4016: 4015: 4012: 4004: 4000: 3996: 3992: 3988: 3983: 3979: 3975: 3971: 3967: 3963: 3959: 3955: 3954: 3953: 3952: 3949: 3944: 3939: 3931: 3927: 3924: 3911: 3910: 3909: 3908: 3907: 3906: 3905: 3904: 3903: 3902: 3893: 3890: 3889:Squeezeweasel 3885: 3881: 3877: 3876: 3875: 3874: 3873: 3872: 3871: 3870: 3861: 3860: 3859: 3858: 3857: 3856: 3851: 3848: 3844: 3843: 3842: 3839: 3833: 3832: 3831: 3827: 3821: 3819: 3818: 3815: 3814: 3813: 3808: 3793: 3790: 3785: 3784: 3783: 3780: 3779: 3778: 3773: 3766: 3761: 3759: 3756: 3752: 3751: 3750: 3749: 3748: 3747: 3744: 3737: 3730: 3725: 3720: 3716: 3712: 3711: 3710: 3709: 3706: 3702: 3693: 3690: 3686: 3682: 3681: 3680: 3677: 3672: 3671: 3670: 3669: 3666: 3657: 3655: 3654: 3651: 3646: 3640: 3636: 3633: 3632:68.227.214.59 3629: 3628: 3627: 3626: 3621: 3613: 3609: 3605: 3604: 3603: 3596: 3594: 3593: 3590: 3585: 3580: 3570: 3569: 3568: 3564: 3560: 3556: 3555:68.117.131.52 3552: 3540: 3538: 3537: 3534: 3529: 3524: 3518: 3514: 3506: 3503: 3499: 3498: 3497: 3494: 3493: 3490: 3482: 3480: 3479: 3476: 3471: 3466: 3460: 3456: 3455: 3444: 3441: 3440:72.36.251.234 3438: 3434: 3433: 3432: 3431: 3430: 3429: 3424: 3421: 3417: 3416: 3415: 3414: 3413: 3412: 3411:User:Sam72991 3408: 3402: 3394: 3391: 3390: 3387: 3382: 3376: 3375: 3373: 3372: 3371: 3368: 3367: 3364: 3359: 3354: 3353: 3352: 3351: 3348: 3343: 3338: 3332: 3326: 3321: 3316: 3312: 3311: 3310: 3309: 3306: 3298: 3296: 3295: 3292: 3273: 3270: 3266: 3265: 3264: 3263: 3262: 3261: 3260: 3259: 3258: 3257: 3256: 3255: 3254: 3253: 3240: 3235: 3230: 3226: 3225: 3224: 3223: 3222: 3221: 3220: 3219: 3218: 3217: 3216: 3215: 3204: 3201: 3197: 3196: 3195: 3194: 3193: 3192: 3191: 3190: 3189: 3188: 3179: 3174: 3169: 3165: 3164: 3163: 3162: 3161: 3160: 3159: 3158: 3151: 3148: 3144: 3143: 3142: 3141: 3140: 3139: 3134: 3129: 3124: 3120: 3119: 3118: 3117: 3114: 3111: 3110: 3107: 3102: 3096: 3095: 3094: 3093: 3090: 3081: 3079: 3078: 3075: 3070: 3065: 3059: 3055: 3051: 3047: 3043: 3039: 3032: 3029: 3020: 3019: 3018: 3011: 3008: 3004: 3000: 2999: 2993: 2989: 2988: 2986: 2981: 2977: 2973: 2969: 2965: 2964: 2962: 2956: 2955: 2953: 2952: 2949: 2946: 2940: 2936: 2932: 2931: 2930: 2929: 2926: 2914: 2911: 2904: 2903: 2902: 2901: 2900: 2899: 2894: 2891: 2890:69.247.72.118 2886: 2885: 2884: 2883: 2876: 2875: 2874: 2873: 2870: 2867: 2861: 2856: 2855: 2854: 2853: 2850: 2846: 2842: 2836: 2835: 2831: 2827: 2821: 2818: 2815: 2810: 2807: 2805: 2801: 2797: 2793: 2787: 2785: 2777: 2774: 2769: 2768: 2767: 2766: 2763: 2757: 2753: 2749: 2745: 2741: 2740:87.112.80.182 2737: 2728: 2727: 2724: 2719: 2714: 2705: 2702: 2701: 2700: 2695: 2686: 2685: 2682: 2679: 2678:72.36.251.234 2674: 2670: 2669: 2668: 2665: 2661: 2657: 2650: 2644: 2641: 2636: 2631: 2624: 2623: 2620: 2617: 2616: 2613: 2608: 2602: 2598: 2597: 2594: 2591: 2590: 2587: 2582: 2576: 2575: 2574: 2568: 2565: 2564: 2561: 2556: 2550: 2549: 2546: 2543: 2542:72.36.251.234 2539: 2535: 2531: 2530: 2529: 2528: 2525: 2524:Arius Maximus 2516: 2513: 2509: 2505: 2501: 2497: 2495: 2490: 2485: 2481: 2480: 2473: 2468: 2463: 2459: 2458: 2457: 2456: 2455: 2454: 2447: 2443: 2442: 2437: 2433: 2429: 2425: 2424: 2423: 2418: 2414: 2409: 2406: 2401: 2397: 2396: 2395: 2391: 2390: 2385: 2381: 2380: 2377: 2374: 2373: 2370: 2365: 2359: 2355: 2351: 2347: 2346: 2345: 2344: 2341: 2332: 2329: 2324: 2320: 2319: 2318: 2317: 2311: 2307: 2306: 2305: 2304: 2297: 2296: 2295: 2294: 2291: 2288: 2283: 2282: 2277: 2276: 2271: 2268: 2267: 2262: 2261: 2260: 2258: 2250: 2247: 2244: 2241: 2240: 2237: 2234: 2233: 2230: 2227: 2226: 2223: 2218: 2213: 2209: 2208: 2203: 2200: 2195: 2194: 2193: 2192: 2191: 2186: 2181: 2176: 2172: 2171: 2168: 2163: 2158: 2154: 2150: 2147: 2143: 2142: 2141: 2140: 2137: 2125: 2124: 2123: 2122: 2121: 2120: 2114: 2108: 2103: 2099: 2098: 2097: 2096: 2092: 2088: 2085: 2081: 2080: 2078: 2077: 2076: 2075: 2072: 2065: 2062: 2056: 2055: 2054: 2053: 2045: 2041: 2038: 2034: 2030: 2029: 2028: 2027: 2024: 2017: 2014: 2011: 2006: 2002: 2001: 2000: 1999: 1996: 1991: 1990: 1987: 1981: 1980: 1975: 1968: 1965: 1962: 1957: 1952: 1951: 1950: 1947: 1943: 1939: 1935: 1930: 1923: 1921: 1909: 1906: 1903: 1898: 1894: 1893: 1892: 1891: 1890: 1889: 1888: 1887: 1880: 1874: 1872: 1871: 1863: 1858: 1854: 1853: 1852: 1851: 1850: 1849: 1842: 1836: 1834: 1833: 1825: 1810: 1802: 1795: 1794: 1793: 1792: 1791: 1790: 1785: 1782: 1779: 1774: 1770: 1769: 1768: 1767: 1764: 1761: 1758: 1753: 1749: 1748: 1747: 1746: 1740: 1738: 1737: 1729: 1723: 1712: 1711: 1697: 1684: 1679: 1676: 1664: 1663: 1662: 1645: 1644: 1628: 1627: 1620: 1613: 1609: 1606: 1601: 1597: 1596:Lindsay Lohan 1593: 1589: 1585: 1584: 1583: 1580: 1577: 1575: 1570: 1564: 1561: 1558: 1555: 1554: 1553: 1551: 1547: 1539: 1525: 1508: 1504: 1500: 1499: 1494: 1491: 1487: 1486: 1482: 1479: 1476: 1473: 1469: 1457: 1440: 1436: 1432: 1428: 1427: 1419: 1413: 1408: 1406: 1403: 1399: 1398: 1394: 1391: 1388: 1385: 1381: 1358: 1355: 1353: 1350: 1347: 1344: 1341: 1338: 1335: 1332: 1329: 1326: 1323: 1320: 1317: 1314: 1311: 1308: 1305: 1301: 1297: 1294: 1293: 1292: 1291: 1285: 1278: 1274: 1272: 1268: 1265: 1261: 1260: 1256: 1253: 1249: 1248: 1244: 1241: 1237: 1236: 1232: 1229: 1225: 1224: 1220: 1219: 1215: 1192: 1190: 1184: 1181: 1178: 1176: 1170: 1167: 1164: 1162: 1156: 1153: 1150: 1148: 1142: 1139: 1136: 1132: 1129: 1126: 1124: 1118: 1115: 1112: 1110: 1104: 1101: 1098: 1096: 1090: 1087: 1084: 1082: 1076: 1075:Hotline Miami 1073: 1070: 1066: 1063: 1060: 1058: 1052: 1049: 1046: 1044: 1038: 1035: 1032: 1030: 1024: 1023:Dr Disrespect 1021: 1018: 1014: 1011: 1008: 1006: 1000: 997: 994: 992: 986: 983: 980: 976: 973: 970: 968: 962: 959: 956: 954: 948: 947:Kim Kitsuragi 945: 942: 938: 935: 932: 928: 925: 922: 918: 915: 912: 910: 904: 901: 898: 896: 890: 887: 884: 882: 876: 873: 872: 858: 854: 853: 849: 846: 842: 841: 837: 834: 830: 829: 825: 822: 818: 817: 813: 810: 806: 805: 801: 800: 796: 778: 774: 771: 768: 764: 761: 758: 754: 751: 750: 741: 735: 733: 728: 725: 722: 716: 714: 709: 708:Covet Fashion 706: 703: 701: 696: 693: 690: 688: 683: 680: 677: 675: 670: 667: 664: 662: 657: 654: 651: 649: 644: 641: 638: 636: 631: 628: 625: 623: 618: 615: 612: 610: 605: 602: 599: 597: 592: 589: 588: 582: 576: 573: 571: 568: 566: 563: 561: 558: 556: 553: 551: 548: 546: 543: 541: 538: 534: 527: 524: 523: 519: 515: 514: 510: 506: 505: 495: 491: 490: 486: 485: 475: 471: 470: 467: 450: 446: 442: 441: 433: 422: 420: 417: 413: 412: 408: 404: 400: 395: 392: 389: 385: 373: 356: 352: 348: 347: 342: 339: 335: 334: 330: 327: 324: 321: 317: 312: 308: 302: 298: 294: 290: 285: 284: 273: 268: 263: 261: 260: 255: 251: 242: 241: 240:April 7, 2004 236: 234: 233:Did you know? 228: 223: 216: 212: 210: 209: 205: 202: 198: 197: 193: 191: 190: 186: 183: 179: 178: 174: 172: 171: 167: 164: 163:June 10, 2006 160: 159: 155: 153: 152: 148: 145: 141: 140: 136: 134: 133: 129: 126: 122: 121: 117: 115: 114: 110: 107: 103: 102: 98: 96: 95: 91: 88: 84: 83: 79: 76: 73: 72: 66: 60: 56: 52: 48: 45: 41: 40: 36: 32: 28: 25: 22: 18: 17: 4363: 4343: 4332: 4324: 4284: 4277: 4275: 4272: 4262: 4246: 4239: 4234: 4226:pathetically 4225: 4223: 4199: 4160: 4134: 4108: 4105: 4097: 4090: 4079:EllipsesBent 4073: 4035: 4026: 4017: 4011:75.21.40.198 4008: 3991:ΖαππερΝαππερ 3935: 3828: 3825: 3803: 3802: 3800: 3768: 3767: 3765:get over it. 3764: 3733: 3714: 3698: 3661: 3644: 3616: 3607: 3600: 3575: 3544: 3510: 3502:86.130.21.79 3495: 3486: 3453: 3452: 3451: 3409: 3406: 3379: 3356: 3329: 3302: 3288: 3099: 3085: 3053: 3050:only experts 3049: 3045: 3037: 3035: 3017:--Slagathor 3015: 3006: 2975: 2967: 2933:Once again, 2921: 2837: 2826:ΖαππερΝαππερ 2822: 2819: 2813: 2811: 2808: 2796:Adolf Hitler 2788: 2780: 2773:Robotman1974 2758: 2754: 2729: 2708: 2690: 2689: 2660:68.55.58.183 2651: 2647: 2605: 2600: 2579: 2571: 2553: 2520: 2512:86.130.21.79 2507: 2503: 2440: 2398:Name 'em. - 2388: 2362: 2357: 2353: 2349: 2337: 2256: 2254: 2215: 2211: 2189: 2152: 2145: 2133: 2068: 2049: 2020: 1992: 1978: 1977: 1971: 1927: 1918: 1869: 1868: 1861: 1855:(But not in 1831: 1830: 1823: 1735: 1734: 1727: 1724: 1708: 1695: 1682: 1680: 1677: 1659: 1642: 1625: 1621: 1617: 1605:87.162.1.152 1581: 1578: 1573: 1571: 1568: 1545: 1543: 1496: 1424: 1310:reassessment 1288: 1270: 1258: 1246: 1234: 1222: 1186: 1172: 1158: 1144: 1120: 1106: 1092: 1078: 1054: 1040: 1026: 1002: 988: 985:Pixel Piracy 964: 961:Miner 2049er 950: 906: 892: 878: 851: 839: 827: 815: 803: 737: 734:participants 731: 718: 715:participants 712: 702:participants 699: 689:participants 686: 682:Ryo Sakazaki 673: 663:participants 660: 650:participants 647: 637:participants 634: 624:participants 621: 611:participants 608: 598:participants 595: 502: 482: 438: 344: 307:WikiProjects 296: 271: 257: 247: 238: 230: 213:Not promoted 206: 187: 168: 156:Not promoted 149: 130: 111: 93: 92: 26: 4280:quality. - 4167:WikiSlasher 3958:video games 3847:WikiSlasher 3549:—Preceding 3420:71.135.72.4 3291:WikiSlasher 3082:Protection? 2784:Jimmy Wales 2734:—Preceding 2654:—Preceding 2534:Hugh Hefner 1796:Compare シャモ 1334:screenshots 1051:Async Corp. 875:Donkey Kong 753:Screen Rant 676:participant 531:Summary of 520:open tasks: 516:Summary of 454:Video games 445:video games 394:Video games 201:May 7, 2007 113:Peer review 4395:Categories 4321:Removed GA 4187:Hbdragon88 4029:LonelyPker 3995:Alexandria 3838:M C Y 1008 3705:Hbdragon88 3489:Jay Gatsby 3435:nice try, 3305:John Knife 3044:. That is 3028:M C Y 1008 3003:Dan Cooper 2945:M C Y 1008 2910:M C Y 1008 2866:M C Y 1008 2830:Alexandria 2358:ridiculous 2328:Queen.zeal 2061:M C Y 1008 1864:murrayinch 1826:murrayinch 1730:murrayinch 1296:assessment 1141:River Raid 828:The Sims 4 777:discussion 767:discussion 757:discussion 727:Vector TDx 617:Butterfree 535:open tasks 403:Characters 237:column on 4364:Gimmetrow 4333:Gimmetrow 4282:A Man In 4093:main page 4075:Bulbasaur 3932:questions 3713:You will 3701:Bulbasaur 2731:articles? 2601:encourage 2408:tsuya-san 2350:statement 2149:Bulbasaur 2144:Have you 2136:Superior1 2052:Lbalhorn. 2046:Featured? 2037:A. Exeunt 2031:Hey, see 2023:A. Exeunt 1995:A. Exeunt 1986:A. Exeunt 1592:Bulbasaur 1546:currently 1328:cover art 1322:infoboxes 999:Ether One 937:Justin Yu 840:Smash Hit 227:Main Page 4296:past ops 4292:conspire 3880:yule log 3789:Mikeblas 3755:Mikeblas 3665:Mikeblas 3563:contribs 3551:unsigned 2925:Tonerman 2814:everyone 2804:Al-Qaeda 2800:Vatican| 2748:contribs 2736:unsigned 2656:unsigned 2652:Sigh... 2508:immature 2417:contribs 1946:contribs 1934:unsigned 1920:I feel. 1352:creation 739:relisted 720:relisted 604:Dokibird 399:Nintendo 297:redirect 252:starter 175:Promoted 137:Reviewed 118:Reviewed 4374:Amarkov 4348:Amarkov 4344:further 4312:Funpika 4180:cvgproj 4101:julmust 3980:, when 3974:WP:FICT 3740:— Matt 3719:Amarkov 3612:Amarkov 3517:Ryulong 3459:Encarta 3381:Deckill 3358:Deckill 3315:Amarkov 3229:Amarkov 3168:Amarkov 3123:Amarkov 3101:Deckill 3042:Nupedia 2906:things. 2792:Pokémon 2607:Deckill 2581:Deckill 2555:Deckill 2484:Amarkov 2462:Amarkov 2364:Deckill 2287:JDS2005 2217:Deckill 2175:Amarkov 2157:Amarkov 1924:Picture 1614:Nihongo 1588:Torchic 1357:merging 1336:(8,818) 1316:cleanup 1169:Pikachu 643:Neo Geo 565:vg talk 555:history 360:Pokémon 351:Pokémon 326:Pokémon 259:Torchic 254:Pokémon 229:in the 194:Demoted 77:Process 27:Torchic 4328:WP:GAC 4308:WP:FAR 4269:party. 4148:Exeunt 4122:Exeunt 3948:Edison 3811:Day349 3776:Day349 3742:Crypto 3736:WP:FAC 3532:Exeunt 3513:ArbCom 3474:Exeunt 3454:PLEASE 3346:Exeunt 3073:Exeunt 3054:anyone 2762:Euchre 2722:Exeunt 2698:Day349 2639:Exeunt 2504:mature 2436:Centrx 2384:Centrx 2212:That's 2084:Liface 1683:Achamo 1626:Achamo 1340:photos 1271:Tetris 630:Bidoof 570:alerts 303:scale. 99:Listed 80:Result 4285:Bl♟ck 4247:isn't 4040:Ķĩřβȳ 3978:WP:RS 3970:manga 3962:anime 3938:WP:RS 3930:WP:RS 3863:(UTC) 3806:Dooms 3771:Dooms 3724:edits 3715:never 3620:edits 3588:shady 3578:Blind 3461:. -- 3320:edits 3234:edits 3173:edits 3128:edits 2693:Dooms 2489:edits 2467:edits 2180:edits 2162:edits 2102:GeeJo 1809:shamo 1801:shamo 1710:shamo 1661:shamo 1435:manga 1431:anime 1348:(190) 1330:(249) 1189:start 1175:start 1161:start 1147:start 1123:start 1109:start 1095:start 1081:start 1057:start 1043:start 1029:start 1005:start 991:start 967:start 953:start 917:Birdo 909:start 895:start 881:start 575:purge 560:shell 545:watch 295:This 250:Hoenn 29:is a 4378:moo! 4352:moo! 4230:WP:N 4165:? -- 4143:iris 4117:iris 4050:Ťįɱé 3968:and 3960:and 3943:WP:N 3928:and 3926:WP:N 3608:have 3559:talk 3541:Spam 3527:iris 3469:iris 3341:iris 3331:Axem 3299:mess 3068:iris 3058:wiki 3007:sigh 2958:old. 2744:talk 2717:iris 2664:talk 2634:iris 2441:talk 2413:talk 2389:talk 2257:what 2146:seen 2013:hway 1974:here 1964:hway 1942:talk 1905:hway 1876:ster 1838:ster 1781:hway 1760:hway 1742:ster 1689:アチャモ 1634:アチャモ 1342:(66) 1324:(21) 585:AfDs 550:edit 540:view 74:Date 4138:Alt 4112:Alt 3966:TCG 3836:-- 3583:man 3522:Alt 3464:Alt 3336:Alt 3063:Alt 3046:not 3038:not 3026:-- 2943:-- 2908:-- 2864:-- 2786:!? 2712:Alt 2629:Alt 2356:or 2354:bad 2107:(c) 2059:-- 1979:all 1948:) . 1816:シャモ 1806:to 1717:シャモ 1696:aka 1678:or 1670:シャモ 1643:aka 1598:or 1594:or 1590:or 1318:(8) 1312:(0) 1302:) ( 1277:rev 1264:rev 1252:nom 1240:nom 1228:nom 1135:nom 1069:nom 1017:nom 979:nom 941:nom 931:nom 921:nom 857:nom 845:nom 833:nom 821:nom 809:nom 256:is 4397:: 4330:. 4294:| 4278:GA 4211:Þ 4205:. 4183:}} 4177:{{ 3674:-- 3648:-- 3565:) 3561:• 2802:! 2750:) 2746:• 2666:) 2536:a 2444:• 2415:: 2392:• 2111:• 2009:ig 1960:ig 1944:• 1901:ig 1777:ig 1756:ig 1702:アカ 1651:アカ 1603:-- 1552:. 1433:, 736:; 717:; 401:/ 397:: 4298:) 4290:( 4265:. 4207:– 4055:Ø 4045:♥ 3557:( 3507:. 3389:r 3385:e 3366:r 3362:e 3109:r 3105:e 3009:* 2862:. 2742:( 2662:( 2615:r 2611:e 2589:r 2585:e 2563:r 2559:e 2517:. 2438:→ 2419:) 2411:( 2404:e 2400:T 2386:→ 2372:r 2368:e 2225:r 2221:e 2104:⁄ 2005:H 1956:H 1940:( 1897:H 1870:e 1862:s 1832:e 1824:s 1819:) 1813:( 1804:) 1798:( 1773:H 1752:H 1736:e 1728:s 1720:) 1714:( 1705:) 1699:( 1692:) 1686:( 1673:) 1667:( 1654:) 1648:( 1637:) 1631:( 1306:) 1304:0 1300:0 1298:( 1279:) 1275:( 1266:) 1262:( 1254:) 1250:( 1242:) 1238:( 1230:) 1226:( 1193:) 1185:( 1179:) 1171:( 1165:) 1157:( 1151:) 1143:( 1137:) 1133:( 1127:) 1119:( 1113:) 1105:( 1099:) 1091:( 1085:) 1077:( 1071:) 1067:( 1061:) 1053:( 1047:) 1039:( 1033:) 1025:( 1019:) 1015:( 1009:) 1001:( 995:) 987:( 981:) 977:( 971:) 963:( 957:) 949:( 943:) 939:( 933:) 929:( 923:) 919:( 913:) 905:( 899:) 891:( 885:) 877:( 859:) 855:( 847:) 843:( 835:) 831:( 823:) 819:( 811:) 807:( 779:) 775:( 769:) 765:( 759:) 755:( 742:) 732:4 729:( 723:) 713:6 710:( 704:) 700:3 697:( 691:) 687:3 684:( 678:) 674:1 671:( 665:) 661:5 658:( 652:) 648:2 645:( 639:) 635:6 632:( 626:) 622:5 619:( 613:) 609:0 606:( 600:) 596:5 593:( 507:. 487:. 309:: 262:? 243:. 235:" 231:"

Index

Former featured article
former featured article
the nomination archive
Main Page trophy
Today's featured article
Did You Know
March 31, 2006
Good article nominee
April 13, 2006
Peer review
April 14, 2006
WikiProject peer review
April 17, 2006
Featured article candidate
June 10, 2006
Featured article candidate
April 13, 2007
Featured article review
May 7, 2007
Featured article candidate
Did You Know
Main Page
Did you know?
April 7, 2004
Hoenn
Pokémon
Torchic

content assessment
WikiProjects

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.